Produced by Mary Glenn Krause, MFR, Charlie Howard, and
the Online Distributed Proofreading Team at
http://www.pgdp.net (This file was produced from images
generously made available by The Internet Archive)
Transcriber’s Note: Italicized text is enclosed in _underscores_.
A MOTOR-FLIGHT
THROUGH FRANCE
[Illustration: CHAUVIGNY: RUINS OF CASTLE]
A MOTOR-FLIGHT
THROUGH FRANCE
BY
EDITH WHARTON
ILLUSTRATED
[Illustration]
NEW YORK
CHARLES SCRIBNER’S SONS
1908
COPYRIGHT, 1908, BY
CHARLES SCRIBNER’S SONS
Published October, 1908
[Illustration]
CONTENTS
PART I
CHAPTER PAGE
I. BOULOGNE TO AMIENS 1
II. BEAUVAIS AND ROUEN 15
III. FROM ROUEN TO FONTAINEBLEAU 24
IV. THE LOIRE AND THE INDRE 34
V. NOHANT TO CLERMONT 48
VI. IN AUVERGNE 56
VII. ROYAT TO BOURGES 66
PART II
I. PARIS TO POITIERS 73
II. POITIERS TO THE PYRENEES 95
III. THE PYRENEES TO PROVENCE 117
IV. THE RHONE TO THE SEINE 143
PART III
A FLIGHT TO THE NORTH-EAST 172
ILLUSTRATIONS
Chauvigny: Ruins of castle Frontispiece
Facing page
Arras: Hôtel de Ville 2
Amiens: West front of the Cathedral 6
Amiens: Ambulatory of the Cathedral 10
Beauvais: West front of the Cathedral 14
Rouen: Rue de l’Horloge 18
Rouen: The façade of the Church of Saint-Maclou 22
Rouen: Monument of the Cardinals of Amboise in the Cathedral 26
Le Petit Andely: View of the town and Château Gaillard 30
Orléans: General view of the town 38
Nohant: Château of George Sand 42
Nohant: Garden pavilion 44
Clermont-Ferrand: Notre-Dame du Port 50
Orcival: The church 62
Moulins: Place del’Hôtel-de-Ville and the Jacquemart tower 70
Bourges: Apse of the Cathedral 74
Château of Maintenon 76
Neuvy Saint-Sépulcre: Church of the Precious Blood 84
Neuvy Saint-Sépulcre: Interior of the church 88
Poitiers: Baptistery of St. John 90
Poitiers: The Church of Notre-Dame-la-Grande 92
Angoulême: Façade of the Cathedral 96
Thiers: View of the town from the Pont de Seychalles 98
Bordeaux: Church of The Holy Cross 100
Bétharram: The bridge 106
Argelès-Gazost: The old bridge 108
Salies de Béarn: View of old town 110
St. Bertrand-de-Comminges: Pier of the Four Evangelists in the
Cloister 116
Albi: General view of the Cathedral 118
Albi: Interior of the Cathedral 120
Nîmes: The Baths of Diana--public gardens 122
Carcassonne: The Porte de l’Aude 124
Saint-Remy: The Mausoleum 126
St. Maximin: Choir stalls in the church 130
Toulon: The House of Puget 134
Orange: The Arch of Marius 136
Grignan: Gate of the castle 138
Valence: The Cathedral 142
Vienne: General view of the town 146
Brou: Tomb of Margaret of Austria in the church 150
Dijon: Mourners on the tomb of Jean Sans Peur 154
Avallon: General view of the town 158
Vézelay: Narthex of the Church of the Madeleine 160
Sens: Apse of the Cathedral 168
Noyon: Hôtel de Ville 186
St. Quentin: Hôtel de Ville 188
Laon: General view of the town and Cathedral 192
Soissons: Ruined church of Saint-Jean-des-Vignes 196
A MOTOR-FLIGHT THROUGH FRANCE
PART I
I
BOULOGNE TO AMIENS
The motor-car has restored the romance of travel.
Freeing us from all the compulsions and contacts of the railway,
the bondage to fixed hours and the beaten track, the approach to
each town through the area of ugliness and desolation created by the
railway itself, it has given us back the wonder, the adventure and the
novelty which enlivened the way of our posting grand-parents. Above
all these recovered pleasures must be ranked the delight of taking a
town unawares, stealing on it by back ways and unchronicled paths, and
surprising in it some intimate aspect of past time, some silhouette
hidden for half a century or more by the ugly mask of railway
embankments and the iron bulk of a huge station. Then the villages that
we missed and yearned for from the windows of the train--the unseen
villages have been given back to us!--and nowhere could the importance
of the recovery have been more delightfully exemplified than on a May
afternoon in the Pas-de-Calais, as we climbed the long ascent beyond
Boulogne on the road to Arras.
It is a delightful country, broken into wide waves of hill and
valley, with hedge-rows high and leafy enough to bear comparison
with the Kentish hedges among which our motor had left us a day or
two before; and the villages, the frequent, smiling, happily-placed
villages, will also meet successfully the more serious challenge of
their English rivals--meet it on other grounds and in other ways, with
paved market-places and clipped _charmilles_ instead of gorse-fringed
commons, with soaring belfries instead of square church towers, with
less of verdure, but more, perhaps, of outline--certainly of line.
[Illustration: ARRAS: HÔTEL DE VILLE]
The country itself--so green, so full and close in texture, so
pleasantly diversified by clumps of woodland in the hollows, and
by streams threading the great fields with light--all this, too,
has the English, or perhaps the Flemish quality--for the border is
close by--with the added beauty of reach and amplitude, the deliberate
gradual flow of level spaces into distant slopes, till the land breaks
in a long blue crest against the seaward horizon.
There was much beauty of detail, also, in the smaller towns through
which we passed: some of them high-perched on ridges that raked the
open country, with old houses stumbling down at picturesque angles from
the central market-place; others tucked in the hollows, among orchards
and barns, with the pleasant country industries reaching almost to the
doors of their churches. In the little villages a deep delicious thatch
overhangs the plastered walls of cottages espaliered with pear-trees,
and ducks splash in ponds fringed with hawthorn and laburnum; and
in the towns there is almost always some note of character, of
distinction--the gateway of a seventeenth century _hôtel_, the triple
arch of a church-front, the spring of an old mossy apse, the stucco and
black cross-beams of an ancient guild-house--and always the straight
lime-walk, square-clipped or trained _en berceau_, with its sharp green
angles and sharp black shade acquiring a value positively architectural
against the high lights of the paved or gravelled _place_. Everything
about this rich juicy land bathed in blond light is characteristically
Flemish, even to the slow-moving eyes of the peasants, the bursting
red cheeks of the children, the drowsy grouping of the cattle in
flat pastures; and at Hesdin we felt the architectural nearness of
the Low Countries in the presence of a fine town-hall of the late
Renaissance, with the peculiar “movement” of volutes and sculptured
ornament--lime-stone against warm brick--that one associates with the
civic architecture of Belgium: a fuller, less sensitive line than the
French architect permits himself, with more massiveness and exuberance
of detail.
This part of France, with its wide expanse of agricultural landscape,
disciplined and cultivated to the last point of finish, shows how
nature may be utilized to the utmost clod without losing its freshness
and naturalness. In some regions of this supremely “administered”
country, where space is more restricted, or the fortunate accidents
of water and varying levels are lacking, the minute excessive culture,
the endless ranges of _potager_ wall, and the long lines of fruit-trees
bordering straight interminable roads, may produce in the American
traveller a reaction toward the unkempt, a momentary feeling that
ragged road-sides and weedy fields have their artistic value. But here
in northern France, where agriculture has mated with poetry instead
of banishing it, one understands the higher beauty of land developed,
humanised, brought into relation to life and history, as compared with
the raw material with which the greater part of our own hemisphere is
still clothed. In France everything speaks of long familiar intercourse
between the earth and its inhabitants; every field has a name, a
history, a distinct place of its own in the village polity; every
blade of grass is there by an old feudal right which has long since
dispossessed the worthless aboriginal weed.
As we neared Arras the road lost its pleasant windings and ran straight
across a great plateau, with an occasional long dip and ascent that
never deflected it from its purpose, and the villages became rarer,
as they always do on the high wind-swept plains of France. Arras,
however, was full of compensations for the dullness of the approach: a
charming old grey town, with a great air of faded seventeenth-century
opulence, in which one would have liked to linger, picking out details
of gateway and courtyard, of sculptured masks and wrought-iron
balconies--if only a brief peep into the hotel had not so promptly
quenched the impulse to spend a night there.
To Amiens therefore we passed on, passing again, toward sunset, into a
more broken country, with lights just beginning to gleam through the
windows of the charming duck-pond villages, and tall black crucifixes
rising ghostly at the cross-roads; and night was obliterating the
mighty silhouette of the cathedral as we came upon it at length by a
long descent.
[Illustration: AMIENS: WEST FRONT OF THE CATHEDRAL]
It is always a loss to arrive in a strange town after dark, and miss
those preliminary stages of acquaintance that are so much more likely
to be interesting in towns than in people; but the deprivation is
partly atoned for by the sense of adventure with which, next morning,
one casts one’s self upon the unknown. There is no conjectural first
impression to be modified, perhaps got rid of: one’s mind presents a
blank page for the town to write its name on.
At Amiens the autograph consists of one big word: the cathedral. Other,
fainter writing may come out when one has leisure to seek for it; but
the predominance of those mighty characters leaves, at first, no time
to read between the lines. And here it may be noted that, out of Italy,
it takes a town of exceptional strength of character to hold its own
against a cathedral. In England, the chapter-house and the varied
groupings of semi-ecclesiastical buildings constituting the close,
which seem to form a connecting link between town and cathedral, do no
more, in reality, than enlarge the skirts of the monument about which
they are clustered; and even at Winchester, which has its college and
hospital to oppose to the predominance of the central pile, there
is, after all, very little dispersal of interest: so prodigious,
so unparalleled, as mere feats of human will-power, are these vast
achievements of the Middle Ages. In northern France, where the great
cathedrals were of lay foundation, and consequently sprang up alone,
without the subordinate colony of monastic buildings of which the
close is a survival--and where, as far as monuments of any importance
are concerned, the architectural gap sometimes extends from Louis the
Saint to Louis the Fourteenth--the ascendancy of the diocesan church
is necessarily even more marked. Rouen alone, perhaps, opposes an
effectual defence to this concentration of interest, will not for a
moment let itself be elbowed out of the way by the great buttresses
of its cathedral; and at Bourges--but Bourges and Rouen come later in
this itinerary, and meanwhile here we are, standing, in a sharp shower,
under a _notaire’s_ doorway, and looking across the little square at
the west front of Amiens.
Well! No wonder such a monument has silenced all competitors. It would
take a mighty counter-blast to make itself heard against “the surge
and thunder” of that cloud of witnesses choiring forth the glories of
the Church Triumphant. Is the stage too crowded? Is there a certain
sameness in the overarching tiers of the stone hierarchy, each figure
set in precise alignment with its neighbours, each drapery drawn within
the same perpendicular bounds? Yes, perhaps--if one remembers Rheims
and Bourges; but if, setting aside such kindred associations, one
surrenders one’s self uncritically to the total impression produced, if
one lets the fortunate accidents of time and weather count for their
full value in that total--for Amiens remains mercifully unscrubbed, and
its armies of saints have taken on the richest _patina_, that northern
stone can acquire--if one views the thing, in short, partly as a symbol
and partly as a “work of nature” (which all ancient monuments by grace
of time become), then the front of Amiens is surely one of the most
splendid spectacles that Gothic art can show.
On the symbolic side especially it would be tempting to linger; so
strongly does the contemplation of the great cathedrals fortify
the conviction that their chief value, to this later age, is not
so much æsthetic as moral. The world will doubtless always divide
itself into two orders of mind: that which sees in past expressions
of faith, political, religious or intellectual, only the bonds cast
off by the spirit of man in its long invincible struggle for “more
light”; and that which, while moved by the spectacle of the struggle,
cherishes also every sign of those past limitations that were, after
all, each in its turn, symbols of the same effort toward a clearer
vision. To the former kind of mind the great Gothic cathedral will be
chiefly interesting as a work of art and a page of history; and it
is perhaps proof of the advantage of cultivating the other--the more
complex--point of view, in which enfranchisement of thought exists in
harmony with atavism of feeling, that it permits one to appreciate
these archæological values to the full, yet subordinates them to
the more impressive facts of which they are the immense and moving
expression. To such minds, the rousing of the sense of reverence is
the supreme gift of these mighty records of mediæval life: reverence
for the persistent, slow-moving, far-reaching forces that brought them
forth. A great Gothic cathedral sums up so much of history, it has cost
so much in faith and toil, in blood and folly and saintly abnegation,
it has sheltered such a long succession of lives, given collective
voice to so many inarticulate and contradictory cravings, seen so much
that was sublime and terrible, or foolish, pitiful and grotesque,
that it is like some mysteriously preserved ancestor of the human race,
some Wandering Jew grown sedentary and throned in stony contemplation,
before whom the fleeting generations come and go.
[Illustration: AMIENS: AMBULATORY OF THE CATHEDRAL]
Yes--reverence is the most precious emotion that such a building
inspires: reverence for the accumulated experiences of the past,
readiness to puzzle out their meaning, unwillingness to disturb rashly
results so powerfully willed, so laboriously arrived at--the desire,
in short, to keep intact as many links as possible between yesterday
and to-morrow, to lose, in the ardour of new experiment, the least that
may be of the long rich heritage of human experience. This, at any
rate, might seem to be the cathedral’s word to the traveller from a
land which has undertaken to get on without the past, or to regard it
only as a “feature” of æsthetic interest, a sight to which one travels
rather than a light by which one lives.
The west front of Amiens says this word with a quite peculiar
emphasis, its grand unity of structure and composition witnessing
as much to constancy of purpose as to persistence of effort. So
steadily, so clearly, was this great thing willed and foreseen, that
it holds the mind too deeply subject to its general conception to
be immediately free for the delighted investigation of detail. But
within the building detail reasserts itself: detail within detail,
worked out and multiplied with a prodigality of enrichment for which
a counterpart must be sought beyond the Alps. The interiors of the
great French cathedrals are as a rule somewhat gaunt and unfurnished,
baring their structural nakedness sublimely but rather monotonously to
eyes accustomed to the Italian churches “all glorious within.” Here
at Amiens, however, the inner decking of the shrine has been piously
continued from generation to generation, and a quite extraordinary
wealth of adornment bestowed on the choir and its ambulatory. The
great sculptured and painted frieze encircling the outer side of the
choir is especially surprising in a French church, so seldom were
the stone histories lavished on the exterior continued within the
building; and it is a farther surprise to find the same tales in
bas-relief animating and enriching the west walls of the transepts.
They are full of crowded expressive incidents, these stories of local
saints and Scriptural personages; with a Burgundian richness and
elaborateness of costume, and a quite charming, childish insistence
on irrelevant episode and detail--the reiterated “And so,” “And then”
of the fairy-tale calling off one’s attention into innumerable little
by-paths, down which the fancy of fifteenth-century worshippers
must have strayed, with oh! what blessedness of relief, from the
unintelligible rites before the altar.
Of composition there is none: it is necessarily sacrificed to the
desire to stop and tell everything; to show, for instance, in an
interesting parenthesis, exactly what Herod’s white woolly dog was
about while Salome was dancing away the Baptist’s head. And thus one is
brought back to the perpetually recurring fact that all northern art
is anecdotic, and has always been so; and that, for instance, all the
elaborate theories of dramatic construction worked out to explain why
Shakespeare crowded his stage with subordinate figures and unnecessary
incidents, and would certainly, in relating the story of Saint John,
have included Herod’s “Tray and Sweetheart” among the dramatis
personæ--that such theories are but an unprofitable evasion of the
ancient ethnological fact _that the Goth has always told his story in
that way_.
[Illustration: BEAUVAIS: WEST FRONT OF THE CATHEDRAL]
II
BEAUVAIS AND ROUEN
The same wonderful white road, flinging itself in great coils and
arrow-flights across the same spacious landscape, swept us on the
next day to Beauvais. If there seemed to be fewer memorable incidents
by the way--if the villages had less individual character, over and
above their general charm of northern thrift and cosiness--it was
perhaps because the first impression had lost its edge; but we caught
fine distant reaches of field and orchard and wooded hillside, giving
a general sense that it would be a good land to live in--till all
these minor sensations were swallowed up and lost in the overwhelming
impression of Beauvais.
The town itself--almost purposely, as we felt afterward--failed to put
itself forward, to arrest us by any of the minor arts which Arras,
for instance, had so seductively exerted. It maintained an attitude
of calm aloofness, of affected ignorance of the traveller’s object in
visiting it--suffering its little shuttered non-committal streets to
lead us up, tortuously, to the drowsiest little provincial _place_,
with the usual lime-arcades, and the usual low houses across the way;
where suddenly there soared before us the great mad broken dream
of Beauvais choir--the cathedral without a nave--the Kubla Khan of
architecture....
It seems in truth like some climax of mystic vision, miraculously
caught in visible form, and arrested, broken off, by the intrusion of
the Person from Porlock--in this case, no doubt, the panic-stricken
mason, crying out to the entranced creator: “We simply can’t keep
it up!” And because it literally couldn’t be kept up--as one or two
alarming collapses soon attested--it had to check there its great wave
of stone, hold itself for ever back from breaking into the long ridge
of the nave and flying crests of buttress, spire and finial. It is
easy for the critic to point out its structural defects, and to cite
them in illustration of the fact that your true artist never seeks to
wrest from their proper uses the materials in which he works--does
not, for instance, try to render metaphysical abstractions in stone
and glass and lead; yet Beauvais has at least none of the ungainliness
of failure: it is like a great hymn interrupted, not one in which the
voices have flagged; and to the desultory mind such attempts seem to
deserve a place among the fragmentary glories of great art. It is, at
any rate, an example of what the Gothic spirit, pushed to its logical
conclusion, strove for: the utterance of the unutterable; and he who
condemns Beauvais has tacitly condemned the whole theory of art from
which it issued. But shall we not have gained greatly in our enjoyment
of beauty, as well as in serenity of spirit, if, instead of saying
“this is good art,” or “this is bad art,” we say “this is classic” and
“that is Gothic”--this transcendental, that rational--using neither
term as an epithet of opprobrium or restriction, but content, when
we have performed the act of discrimination, to note what forms of
expression each tendency has worked out for itself?
Beyond Beauvais the landscape became more deeply Norman--more thatched
and green and orchard-smothered--though, as far as the noting of
detail went, we did not really get _beyond Beauvais_ at all, but
travelled on imprisoned in that tremendous memory till abruptly, from
the crest of a hill, we looked down a long green valley to Rouen
shining on its river--belfries, spires and great arched bridges
drenched with a golden sunset that seemed to shoot skyward from the
long illuminated reaches of the Seine. I recall only two such magic
descents on famous towns: that on Orvieto, from the last hill of the
Viterbo road, and the other-pitched in a minor key, but full of a small
ancient majesty--the view of Wells in its calm valley, as the Bath road
gains the summit of the Mendip hills.
[Illustration: ROUEN: RUE DE L’HORLOGE]
The poetry of the descent to Rouen is, unhappily, dispelled by the
long approach through sordid interminable outskirts. Orvieto and
Wells, being less prosperous, do not subject the traveller to this
descent into prose, which leaves one reflecting mournfully on the
incompatibility, under our present social system, between prosperity
and beauty. As for Rouen itself, as one passes down its crowded
tram-lined quays, between the noisy unloading of ships and the clatter
of innumerable cafés, one feels that the old Gothic town one used
to know cannot really exist any more, must have been elbowed out of
place by these spreading commercial activities; but it turns out to be
there, after all, holding almost intact, behind the dull mask of modern
streets, the surprise of its rich mediævalism.
Here indeed the traveller finds himself in no mere “cathedral town”;
with one street leading to Saint Ouen, another to Saint Maclou, a third
to the beautiful Palais de Justice, the cathedral itself has put forth
the appeal of all its accumulated treasures to make one take, first
of all, the turn to its doors. There are few completer impressions in
Europe than that to be received as one enters the Lady Chapel of Rouen,
where an almost Italian profusion of colour and ornament have been
suffered to accumulate slowly about its central ornament--the typically
northern monument of the two Cardinals of Amboise. There could hardly
be a better example of the æsthetic wisdom of “living and letting live”
than is manifested by the happy way in which supposedly incompatible
artistic ideals have contrived to make _bon ménage_ in this delicious
corner. It is a miracle that they have been allowed to pursue their
happy experiment till now, for there must have been moments when, to
the purist of the Renaissance, the Gothic tomb of the Cardinals seemed
unworthy to keep company with the Sénéchal de Brézé’s monument, in
which the delicate note of classicalism reveals a France so profoundly
modified by Italy; just as, later, the great Berniniesque altar-piece,
with its twisted columns and exuberance of golden rays, must have
narrowly escaped the axe of the Gothic reactionary. But there they
all are, blending their supposed discords in a more complex harmony,
filling the privileged little edifice with an overlapping richness
of hue and line through which the eye perpetually passes back to the
central splendour of the Cardinals’ tomb.
A magnificent monument it is, opposing to the sober beauty of Germain
Pilon’s composition its insolence of varied detail--the “this, and
this, and this” of the loquacious mediæval craftsman--all bound
together by the pew constructive sense which has already learned
how to bring the topmost bud of the marble finials into definite
relation with the little hooded mourners bowed in such diversity of
grief in their niches below the tomb. A magnificent monument--and
to my mind the finest thing about it is the Cardinal Uncle’s nose.
The whole man is fine in his sober dignity, humbly conscious of the
altar toward which he faces, arrogantly aware of the purple on his
shoulders; and the nose is the epitome of the man. We live in the day
of little noses: that once stately feature, intrinsically feudal and
aristocratic in character--the _maschio naso_ extolled of Dante--has
shrunk to democratic insignificance, like many another fine expression
of individualism. And so one must look to the old painters and
sculptors to see what a nose was meant to be--the prow of the face;
the evidence of its owner’s standing, of his relation to the world,
and his inheritance from the past. Even in the profile of the Cardinal
Nephew, kneeling a little way behind his uncle, the gallant feature is
seen to have suffered a slight diminution: its spring, still bold, is
less commanding; it seems, as it were, to have thrust itself against
a less yielding element. And so the deterioration has gone on from
generation to generation, till the nose has worn itself blunt against
the increasing resistances of a democratic atmosphere, and stunted,
atrophied and amorphous, serves only, now, to let us know when we have
the influenza.
With the revisiting of the Cardinal’s nose the first object of our
visit to Rouen had been accomplished; the second led us, past objects
of far greater importance, to the well-arranged but dull gallery where
Gerhard David’s “Virgin of the Grapes” is to be seen. Every wanderer
through the world has these pious pilgrimages to perform, generally to
shrines of no great note--how often, for instance, is one irresistibly
drawn back to the Transfiguration or to the Venus of Milo?--but to
lesser works, first seen, perhaps, at a fortunate moment, or having
some special quality of suggestion and evocation that the perfect
equilibrium of the masterpieces causes them to lack. So I know of
some who go first to “The Death of Procris” in the National Gallery;
to the little “Apollo and Marsyas” of the Salon Carré; to a fantastic
allegorical picture, subject and artist unknown, in an obscure corner
of the Uffizi; and who would travel more miles to see again, in the
little gallery of Rimini, an Entombment of the school of Mantegna, than
to sit beneath the vault of the Sistine.
[Illustration: ROUEN: THE FAÇADE OF THE CHURCH OF SAINT-MACLOU]
All of which may seem to imply an unintentional disparagement of
Gerhard David’s picture, which is, after all, a masterpiece of its
school; but the school is a subordinate one, and, save to the student
of Flemish art, his is not a loud-sounding name: one does not say, for
instance, with any hope of general recognition--“Ah, yes; that reminds
me of such and such a bit in ‘The Virgin of the Grapes.’”
All the more, therefore, may one enjoy his picture, in the empty
room of the Rouen gallery, with that gentle sense of superiority
and possessorship to which the discerner of obscure merit is surely
entitled. How much of its charm this particular painting owes to its
not having become the picnic-ground of the art-excursionist, how
much to its own intrinsic beauty, its grave serenities of hue and
gesture--how much, above all, to the heavenly translucence of that
bunch of grapes plucked from the vines of Paradise--it is part of its
very charm to leave unsettled, to keep among the mysteries whereby it
draws one back. Only one trembles lest it should cease to shine in its
own twilight heaven when it has become a star in Baedeker....
III
FROM ROUEN TO FONTAINEBLEAU
The Seine, two days later, by the sweetest curves, drew us on from
Rouen to Les Andelys, past such bright gardens terraced above its
banks, such moist poplar-fringed islands, such low green promontories
deflecting its silver flow, that we continually checked the flight of
the motor, pausing here, and here, and here again, to note how France
understands and enjoys and lives with her rivers.
With her great past, it seems, she has partly ceased to live; for,
ask as we would, we could not, that morning, learn the way to King
Richard’s Château Gaillard on the cliff above Les Andelys. Every turn
from the route de Paris seemed to lead straight into the unknown;
“_mais c’est tout droit pour_ Paris” was the invariable answer when we
asked our way. Yet a few miles off were two of the quaintest towns
of France--the Little and Great Andely--surmounted by a fortress
marking an epoch in military architecture, and associated with the
fortunes of one of the most romantic figures in history; and we
knew that if we clung to the windings of the Seine they must lead
us, within a few miles, to the place we sought. And so, having with
difficulty disentangled ourselves from the route de Paris, we pushed
on, by quiet by-roads and unknown villages, by _manoirs_ of grey stone
peeping through high thickets of lilac and laburnum, and along shady
river-reaches where fishermen dozed in their punts, and cattle in the
meadow-grass beneath the willows--till the soft slopes broke abruptly
into tall cliffs shaggy with gorse, and the easy flow of the river was
forced into a sharp twist at their base. There is something fantastic
in this sudden change of landscape near Les Andelys from the familiar
French river-scenery to what might be one of Piero della Francesca’s
backgrounds of strangely fretted rock and scant black vegetation; while
the Seine, roused from its progress through yielding meadows, takes a
majestic bend toward the Little Andely in the bay of the cliffs, and
then sweeps out below the height on which Cœur-de-Lion planted his
subtly calculated bastions.
[Illustration: ROUEN: MONUMENT OF THE CARDINALS OF AMBOISE IN THE
CATHEDRAL]
Ah--poor fluttering rag of a ruin, so thin, so time-worn, so riddled
with storm and shell, that it droops on its rock like a torn banner
with forgotten victories in its folds! How much more eloquently these
tottering stones tell their story, how much deeper into the past they
take us, than the dapper weather-tight castles--Pierrefonds, Langeais,
and the rest--on which the arch-restorer has worked his will, reducing
them to mere museum specimens, archæological toys, from which all
the growths of time have been ruthlessly stripped! The eloquence of
the Château Gaillard lies indeed just there--in its telling us so
discursively, so plaintively, the _whole_ story of the centuries--how
long it has stood, how much it has seen, how far the world has
travelled since then, and to what a hoarse, cracked whisper the voice
of feudalism and chivalry has dwindled....
The town that once cowered under the protection of those fallen
ramparts still groups its stout old houses about a church so grey
and venerable, yet so sturdily planted on its ancient piers, that
one might fancy its compassionately bidding the poor ghost of a
fortress come down and take shelter beneath its vaultings. Commune and
castle, they have changed places with the shifting fortunes of the
centuries, the weak growth of the town outstripping the arrogant brief
bloom of the fortress--Richard’s “fair daughter of one year”--which had
called it arbitrarily into being. The fortress itself is now no more
than one of the stage-properties of the Muse of History; but the town,
poor little accidental offshoot of a military exigency, has built up a
life for itself, become an abiding centre of human activities--though,
by an accident in which the traveller cannot but rejoice, it still
keeps, in spite of its sound masonry and air of ancient health, that
almost unmodernised aspect which makes some little French burghs recall
the figure of a lively centenarian, all his faculties still active, but
wearing the dress of a former day.
Regaining the route de Paris, we passed once more into the normal Seine
landscape, with smiling towns close-set on its shores, with lilac
and wistaria pouring over high walls, with bright little cafés on
sunny village squares, with flotillas of pleasure-boats moored under
willow-shaded banks.
Never more vividly than in this Seine country does one feel the amenity
of French manners, the long process of social adaptation which has
produced so profound and general an intelligence of life. Every one
we passed on our way, from the canal-boatman to the white-capped
baker’s lad, from the _marchande des quatre saisons_ to the white dog
curled philosophically under her cart, from the pastry-cook putting
a fresh plate of _brioches_ in his appetising window to the curé’s
_bonne_ who had just come out to drain the lettuce on the curé’s
doorstep--all these persons (under which designation I specifically
include the dog) took their ease or pursued their business with that
cheerful activity which proceeds from an intelligent acceptance of
given conditions. They each had their established niche in life, the
frankly avowed interests and preoccupations of their order, their pride
in the smartness of the canal-boat, the seductions of the show-window,
the glaze of the _brioches_, the crispness of the lettuce. And this
admirable _fitting into the pattern_, which seems almost as if it were
a moral outcome of the universal French sense of form, has led the race
to the happy, the momentous discovery that good manners are a short
cut to one’s goal, that they lubricate the wheels of life instead of
obstructing them. This discovery--the result, as it strikes one, of the
application of the finest of mental instruments to the muddled process
of living--seems to have illuminated not only the social relation but
its outward, concrete expression, producing a finish in the material
setting of life, a kind of conformity in inanimate things--forming,
in short, the background of the spectacle through which we pass, the
canvas on which it is painted, and expressing itself no less in the
trimness of each individual garden than in that insistence on civic
dignity and comeliness so miraculously maintained, through every
torment of political passion, every change of social conviction, by a
people resolutely addressed to the intelligent enjoyment of living.
By Vernon, with its trim lime-walks _en berceau_, by Mantes with its
bright gardens, and the graceful over-restored church which dominates
its square, we passed on to Versailles, forsaking the course of the
Seine that we might have a glimpse of the country about Fontainebleau.
At the top of the route du Buc, which climbs by sharp windings from
the Place du Château at Versailles, one comes upon the arches of the
aqueduct of Buc--one of the monuments of that splendid folly which
created the “Golden House” of Louis XIV, and drew its miraculous
groves and gardens from the waterless plain of Versailles. The
aqueduct, forming part of the extravagant scheme of irrigation of which
the Machine de Marly and the great canal of Maintenon commemorate
successive disastrous phases, frames, in its useless lofty openings,
such charming glimpses of the country to the southwest of Versailles,
that it takes its place among those abortive architectural experiments
which seem, after all, to have been completely justified by time.
[Illustration: LE PETIT ANDELY: VIEW OF THE TOWN AND CHÂTEAU GAILLARD]
The landscape upon which the arches look is a high-lying region of
wood and vale, with châteaux at the end of long green vistas, and old
flowery villages tucked into folds of the hills. At the first turn of
the road above Versailles the well-kept suburbanism of the Parisian
environ gives way to the real look of the country--well-kept and
smiling still, but tranquil and sweetly shaded, with big farmyards,
quiet country lanes, and a quiet country look in the peasants’ faces.
In passing through some parts of France one wonders where the
inhabitants of the châteaux go when they emerge from their gates--so
interminably, beyond those gates, do the flat fields, divided by
straight unshaded roads, reach out to every point of the compass; but
here the wooded undulations of the country, the friendliness of the
villages, the recurrence of big rambling farm-steads--some, apparently,
the remains of fortified monastic granges--all suggest the possibility
of something resembling the English rural life, with its traditional
ties between park and fields.
The brief journey between Versailles and Fontainebleau offers--if
one takes the longer way, by Saint Rémy-les-Chevreuse and Etampes--a
succession of charming impressions, more varied than one often finds in
a long day’s motor-run through France; and midway one comes upon the
splendid surprise of Dourdan.
Ignorance is not without its æsthetic uses; and to drop down into the
modest old town without knowing--or having forgotten, if one prefers
to put it so--the great castle of Philip Augustus, which, moated,
dungeoned, ivy-walled, still possesses its peaceful central square--to
come on this vigorous bit of mediæval arrogance, with the little houses
of Dourdan still ducking their humble roofs to it in an obsequious
circle--well! to taste the full flavour of such sensations, it is worth
while to be of a country where the last new grain-elevator or office
building is the only monument that receives homage from the surrounding
architecture.
Dourdan, too, has the crowning charm of an old inn facing its
_château-fort_--such an inn as Manon and des Grieux dined in on the
way to Paris--where, in a large courtyard shaded by trees, one may
feast on strawberries and cheese at a table enclosed in clipped shrubs,
with dogs and pigeons amicably prowling for crumbs, and the host and
hostess, their maid-servants, ostlers and _marmitons_ breakfasting at
another long table, just across the hedge. Now that the demands of
the motorist are introducing modern plumbing and Maple furniture into
the uttermost parts of France, these romantic old inns, where it is
charming to breakfast, if precarious to sleep, are becoming as rare
as the mediæval keeps with which they are, in a way, contemporaneous;
and Dourdan is fortunate in still having two such perfect specimens to
attract the attention of the archæologist.
Etampes, our next considerable town, seemed by contrast rather
featureless and disappointing; yet for that very reason, so typical
of the average French country town--dry, compact, unsentimental, as
if avariciously hoarding a long rich past--that its one straight
grey street and squat old church will hereafter always serve for the
_ville de province_ background in my staging of French fiction. Beyond
Etampes, as one approaches Fontainebleau, the scenery grows extremely
picturesque, with bold outcroppings of blackened rock, fields of
golden broom, groves of birch and pine--first hints of the fantastic
sandstone scenery of the forest. And presently the long green aisles
opened before us in all the freshness of spring verdure--tapering away
right and left to distant _ronds-points_, to mossy stone crosses and
obelisks--and leading us toward sunset to the old town in the heart of
the forest.
IV
THE LOIRE AND THE INDRE
Fontainebleau is charming in May, and at no season do its glades more
invitingly detain the wanderer; but it belonged to the familiar,
the already-experienced part of our itinerary, and we had to press
on to the unexplored. So after a day’s roaming of the forest, and a
short flight to Moret, mediævally seated in its stout walls on the
poplar-edged Loing, we started on our way to the Loire.
Here, too, our wheels were still on beaten tracks; though the morning’s
flight across country to Orléans was meant to give us a glimpse of a
new region. But on that unhappy morning Boreas was up with all his
pack, and hunted us savagely across the naked plain, now behind, now
on our quarter, now dashing ahead to lie in ambush behind a huddled
village, and leap on us as we rounded its last house. The plain
stretched on interminably, and the farther it stretched the harder
the wind raced us; so that Pithiviers, spite of dulcet associations,
appeared to our shrinking eyes only as a wind-break, eagerly striven
for and too soon gained and passed; and when, at luncheon-time, we beat
our way, spent and wheezing, into Orléans, even the serried memories of
that venerable city endeared it to us less than the fact that it had an
inn where we might at last find shelter.
The above wholly inadequate description of an interesting part of
France will have convinced any rational being that motoring is no way
to see the country. And that morning it certainly was not; but then,
what of the afternoon? When we rolled out of Orléans after luncheon,
both the day and the scene had changed; and what other form of travel
could have brought us into such communion with the spirit of the Loire
as our smooth flight along its banks in the bland May air? For, after
all, if the motorist sometimes misses details by going too fast, he
sometimes has them stamped into his memory by an opportune puncture
or a recalcitrant “magneto”; and if, on windy days, he has to rush
through nature blindfold, on golden afternoons such as this he can
drain every drop of her precious essence.
Certainly we got a great deal of the Loire as we followed its windings
that day: a great sense of the steely breadth of its flow, the amenity
of its shores, the sweet flatness of the richly gardened and vineyarded
landscape, as of a highly cultivated but slightly insipid society; an
impression of long white villages and of stout conical towns on little
hills; of old brown Beaugency in its cup between two heights, and
Madame de Pompadour’s Ménars on its bright terraces; of Blois, nobly
bestriding the river at a noble bend; and farther south, of yellow
cliffs honeycombed with strange dwellings; of Chaumont and Amboise
crowning their heaped-up towns; of _manoirs_, walled gardens, rich
pastures, willowed islands; and then, toward sunset, of another long
bridge, a brace of fretted church-towers, and the widespread roofs of
Tours.
Had we visited by rail the principal places named in this itinerary,
necessity would have detained us longer in each, and we should have
had a fuller store of specific impressions; but we should have missed
what is, in one way, the truest initiation of travel, the sense of
continuity, of relation between different districts, of familiarity
with the unnamed, unhistoried region stretching between successive
centres of human history, and exerting, in deep unnoticed ways, so
persistent an influence on the turn that history takes. And after
all--though some people seem to doubt the fact--it is possible to
stop a motor and get out of it; and if, on our way down the Loire, we
exercised this privilege infrequently, it was because, here again, we
were in a land of old acquaintance, of which the general topography was
just the least familiar part.
It was not till, two days later, we passed out of Tours--not, in fact,
till we left to the northward the towered pile of Loches--that we
found ourselves once more in a new country. It was a cold day of high
clouds and flying sunlight: just the sky to overarch the wide rolling
landscape through which the turns of the Indre were leading us. To the
south, whither we were bound, lay the Berry--the land of George Sand;
while to the northwest low acclivities sloped away, with villages
shining on their sides. One arrow of sunlight, I remember, transfixed
for a second an unknown town on one of these slopes: a town of some
consequence, with walls and towers that flashed far-off and mysterious
across the cloudy plain. Who has not been tantalised in travelling,
by the glimpse of such cities--unnamed, undiscoverable afterward by
the minutest orientations of map and guide-book? Certainly, to the
uninitiated, no hill-town is visible on that particularly level section
of the map of France; yet there sloped the hill, there shone the
town--not a moment’s mirage, but the companion of an hour’s travel,
dominating the turns of our road, beckoning to us across the increasing
miles, and causing me to vow, as we lost the last glimpse of its
towers, that next year I would go back and make it give up its name.
[Illustration: ORLÉANS: GENERAL VIEW OF THE TOWN]
But now we were approaching a town with a name--a name so encrusted
and overgrown with associations that it was undeniably disappointing,
as we reached its outskirts, to find Châteauroux--aside from its fine
old château on the Indre--so exactly like other dull French towns,
so provokingly unconscious of being one of the capital cities of
literature. And it seems, in fact, literally as well as figuratively
unaware of its distinction. Fame throws its circles so wide that it
makes not a ripple near home; and even the alert landlady of the Hôtel
Sainte Catherine wrinkled her brows perplexedly at our question: “Is
one permitted to visit the house of George Sand?”
“_Le château de George Sand?_ (A pause of reflection.) _C’est
l’écrivain, n’est-ce pas?_ (Another pause.) _C’est à Nohant, le
château? Mais, Madame, je ne saurais vous le dire._”
Yet here was the northern gate of the Sand country--it was here that,
for years, the leaders of the most sedentary profession of a sedentary
race--the _hommes de lettres_ of France--descended from the Paris
express, and took a diligence on their pilgrimage to the oracle. When
one considers the fatigue of the long day’s railway journey, and the
French dread of _déplacements_, the continual stream of greatness that
Paris poured out upon Nohant gives the measure of what Nohant had to
offer in return.
As we sat at breakfast in the inn dining-room we irreverently pictured
some of these great personages--Liszt, Sainte-Beuve, Gautier, Dumas
fils, Flaubert--illustrious figures in the queer dishabille of travel,
unwinding strange _cache-nez_, solicitous for embroidered carpet-bags,
seated in that very room over their coffee and omelette, or climbing
to the coupé of the diligence outside. And then we set out on the same
road.
Straight as an arrow, after the unvarying fashion of the French
government highway, it runs southeast through vast wheatfields, past
barns and farmhouses grouped as in the vanished “drawing-books” of
infancy--now touching, now deserting the Indre banks, as the capricious
river throws its poplar-edged loops across the plain. But presently we
began to mount insensibly; till at length a sharp turn, and an abrupt
fall of the land, brought us out on a ridge above the plain of the
Berry, with the river reappearing below, and far, far south a blue haze
of mountains.
The road, after that, descends again by gentle curves, acquainting
one gradually with the charming details of the foreground--pale-green
copses, fields hedged with hawthorn, long lines of poplars in the
plain--while, all the way, the distant horizon grows richer, bluer
and more mysterious. It is a wide lonely country, with infrequent
villages--mere hamlets--dotting the fields; one sees how the convivial
Dudevant, coming from the livelier Gascony, might have found it, for
purposes of pot-house sociability, a little thinly settled. At one of
these small lonely villages--Vicq--just where the view spreads widest,
the road loses it again by a gradual descent of a mile or so; and at
the foot of the hill, among hawthorn and lilac hedges, through the
boughs of budding trees, a high slate roof shows to the left--the roof
of a plain-faced fawn-coloured house, the typical _gentilhommière_ of
the French country-side.
No other house is in sight: only, from behind the trees, peep two or
three humble tiled cottages, dependencies of the larger pile. There
is nothing to tell us the name of the house--nothing to signalise
it, to take it out of the common. It stands there large, placid,
familiarly related to the high-road and the farm, like one side of
the extraordinary woman it sheltered; and perhaps that fact helps to
suggest its name, to render almost superfluous our breathless question
to the pretty goose-girl knitting under the hedge.
“_Mais oui, Madame--c’est Nohant._”
The goose-girl--pink as a hawthorn bud, a “kerchief” tied about her
curls--might really, in the classic phrase of sentimental travel, have
“stepped out” of one of the novels written yonder, under the high roof
to which she pointed: she had the honest savour of the _terroir_,
yet with that superadded grace that the author of the novels has
been criticised for bestowing on her peasants. She formed, at any
rate, a charming link between our imagination and the famous house;
and we presently found that the miracle which had preserved her in
all her 1830 grace had been extended to the whole privileged spot,
which seemed, under a clear glass bell of oblivion, to have been kept
intact, unchanged, like some wonderful “exhibit” illustrative of the
extraordinary history lived within it.
[Illustration: NOHANT: CHÂTEAU OF GEORGE SAND]
The house faces diagonally toward the road, from which a high wall
once screened it; but it is written in the _Histoire de ma vie_ that
M. Dudevant, in a burst of misdirected activity, threw down several
yards of this wall, and filled the opening with a hedge. The hedge
is still there; and thanks to this impulse of destruction, the
traveller obtains a glimpse of grass terraces and stone steps, set in
overgrown thickets of lilac, hawthorn and acacia, and surmounted by the
long tranquil front of the château. On each side, beyond the stretch
of hedge, the wall begins again; terminating, at one corner of the
property, in a massive old cow-stable with a round pepper-pot tower;
at the opposite end is a charming conical-roofed garden-pavilion, with
mossy steps ascending to it from the road.
At right angles to the highway, a shady lane leads down past the farm
buildings; and following this, one comes, around their flank, on a
large pleasant untidy farm-yard, full of cows and chickens, and divided
by the long range of the _communs_ from the entrance-court of the
château. Farm-yard and court both face on a small grassy place--what,
in England, would pass for a diminutive common--in the centre of which,
under an ancient walnut-tree, stands a much more ancient church--a
church so tiny, black and shrunken that it somehow suggests a blind
old peasant woman mumbling and dozing in the shade. This is the parish
church of Nohant; and a few yards from it, adjoining the court of
the château, lies the little walled graveyard which figures so often
in the _Histoire de ma vie_, and where she who described it now rests
with her kin. The graveyard is defended from intrusion by a high wall
and a locked gate; and after all her spirit is not there, but in the
house and the garden--above all, in the little cluster of humble old
cottages enclosing the shady place about the church, and constituting,
apparently, the whole village of Nohant. Like the goose-girl, these
little houses are surprisingly picturesque and sentimental; and their
mossy roofs, their clipped yews, the old white-capped women who sit
spinning on their doorsteps, supply almost too ideal an answer to one’s
hopes.
[Illustration: NOHANT: GARDEN PAVILION]
And when, at last, excitedly and enchantedly, one has taken in the
quiet perfection of it all, and turned to confront the great question:
Does a sight of Nohant deepen the mystery, or elucidate it?--one can
only answer, in the cautious speech of the New England casuist: _Both._
For if it helps one to understand one side of George Sand’s life, it
seems actually to cast a thicker obscurity over others--even if, among
the different sides contemplated, one includes only those directly
connected with the place, and not the innumerable facets that reflected
Paris, Venice, Fontainebleau and Majorca.
The first surprise is to find the place, on the whole, so much
more--shall one say?--dignified and decent, so much more conscious
of social order and restraints, than the early years of the life led
in it. The pictures of Nohant in the _Histoire de ma vie_ are unlike
any other description of French provincial manners at that period,
suggesting rather an affinity with the sombre Brontë background than
the humdrum but conventional and orderly existence of the French rural
gentry.
When one recalls the throng of motley characters who streamed in and
out of that quiet house--the illegitimate children of both sides,
living in harmony with one another and with the child of wedlock,
the too-intimate servants, the peasant playmates, the drunken boon
companions--when one turns to the Hogarthian pictures of midnight
carouses presided over by the uproarious Hippolyte and the sombrely
tippling Dudevant, while their wives sat disgusted, but apparently
tolerant, above stairs, one feels one’s self in the sinister gloom
of Wildfell Hall rather than in the light temperate air of a French
province. And somehow, unreasonably of course, one expects the
house to bear, even outwardly, some mark of that dark disordered
period--or, if not, then of the cheerful but equally incoherent and
inconceivable existence led there when the timid Madame Dudevant was
turning into the great George Sand, and the strange procession which
continued to stream through the house was composed no longer of drunken
gentlemen-farmers and left-handed peasant relations, but of an almost
equally fantastic and ill-assorted company of ex-priests, naturalists,
journalists, Saint-Simonians, riders of every conceivable religious,
political and literary hobby, among whom the successive tutors of
the adored Maurice--forming in themselves a line as long as the
kings in _Macbeth_!--perhaps take the palm for oddness of origin and
adaptability of manners.
One expected the scene of these confused and incessant comings and
goings to wear the injured _déclassé_ air of a house which has never
had its rights respected--a house long accustomed to jangle its
dinner-bell in vain and swing its broken hinges unheeded; and instead,
one beholds this image of aristocratic well-being, this sober edifice,
conscious in every line of its place in the social scale, of its
obligations to the church and cottages under its wing, its rights over
the acres surrounding it. And so one may, not too fancifully, recognise
in it the image of those grave ideals to which George Sand gradually
conformed the passionate experiment of her life; may even indulge one’s
self by imagining that an old house so marked in its very plainness,
its conformity, must have exerted, over a mind as sensitive as hers,
an unperceived but persistent influence, giving her that centralising
weight of association and habit which is too often lacking in modern
character, and standing ever before her as the shrine of those
household pieties to which, inconsistently enough, but none the less
genuinely, the devotion of her last years was paid.
V
NOHANT TO CLERMONT
There happened to us, on leaving Nohant, what had happened after
Beauvais: the quiet country house by the roadside, like the mighty
Gothic choir, possessed our thoughts to the exclusion of other
impressions. As far as La Châtre, indeed--the little town on the Indre,
where young Madame Dudevant spent a winter to further her husband’s
political ambitions--we were still within the Nohant radius; and it was
along the straight road we were travelling that poor old Madame Dupin
de Francueil--_si douillette_ that she could hardly make the round of
the garden--fled in her high-heeled slippers on the fatal night when
her son, returning from a gay supper at La Châtre, was flung from his
horse and killed at the entrance to the town. These scenes from the
_Histoire de ma vie_ are so vivid, they live so poignantly in memory,
that in reliving them on the spot one feels, with Goncourt, how great
their writer would have been had her intrepid pen more often remained
_dans le vrai_.
La Châtre is a charming town, with a remarkably picturesque approach,
on the Nohant side, across an old bridge out of which an old house,
with a steep terraced garden, seems to grow with the conscious
pleasure of well-grouped masonry; and the streets beyond have an air
of ripe experience tempered by gaiety, like that of those ironic old
eighteenth-century faces wherein the wrinkles are as gay as dimples.
Southward from La Châtre, the road runs through a beautiful hilly
country to Montluçon on the Cher: a fine old border town, with a
brave fighting past, and interesting relics of Bourbon ascendancy;
but now deeply disfigured by hideous factories and long grimy streets
of operatives’ houses. In deploring the ravages of modern industry
on one of these rare old towns, it is hard to remember that they
are not museum pieces, but settlements of human beings with all the
normal desire to prosper at whatever cost to the physiognomy of their
birthplace; and Montluçon in especial seems to have been a very
pelican to the greed of her offspring.
We had meant to spend the night there, but there was a grimness about
the inn--the special grimness of which the commercial travellers’ hotel
in the French manufacturing town holds the depressing secret--that
forbade even a glance at the bedrooms; and though it was near sunset
we pressed on for Vichy. We had, in consequence, but a cold twilight
glimpse of the fine gorge of Montaigut, through which the road cuts
its way to Gannat, the first town to the north of the Limagne; and
night had set in when we traversed the plain of the Allier. On good
French roads, however, a motor-journey by night is not without its
compensations; and our dark flight through mysterious fields and
woods terminated, effectively enough, with the long descent down a
lamp-garlanded boulevard into the inanimate white watering-place.
[Illustration: CLERMONT-FERRAND: NOTRE-DAME DU PORT]
Vichy, in fact, had barely opened the shutters of its fashionable
hotels: the season does not begin till June, and in May only a few
premature bathers--mostly English--shiver in corners of the marble
halls, or disconsolately peruse last year’s news in the deserted
reading-rooms. But even in this semi-chrysalis stage the town presented
itself, the next morning, as that rarest of spectacles--grace
triumphant over the processes of the toilet. Only a pretty woman and a
French _ville d’eau_ can look really charming in morning dishabille;
and the way in which Vichy accomplishes the feat would be a lesson to
many pretty women.
The place, at all seasons, is an object-lesson to less enlightened
municipalities; and when one finds one’s self vainly wishing that art
and history, and all the rich tapestry of the past, might somehow be
brought before the eyes of our self-sufficient millions, one might
pause to ask if the sight of a well-kept, self-respecting French town,
carefully and artistically planned as a setting to the amenities of
life, would not, after all, offer the more salutary and surprising
example.
Vichy, even among French towns, stands out as a singularly finished
specimen of what such municipal pride can accomplish. From its broad
plane-shaded _promenade_, flanked by bright-faced hotels, and by
the arcades of the Casino, to the park on the Allier, and the wide
circumjacent boulevards, it wears, at every turn, the same trim holiday
air, the rouge and patches of smooth gravel, bright flower-borders,
gay shops, shady benches, inviting cafés. Even the cab-stands, with
their smart vis-à-vis and victorias drawn by plump cobs in tinkling
harnesses, seem part of a dream-town, where all that is usually sordid
and shabby has been touched by the magic wand of trimness; or where
some utopian millionaire has successfully demonstrated that the sordid
and shabby need never exist at all.
But, to the American observer, Vichy is perhaps most instructive just
because it is not the millionaire’s wand which has worked the spell;
because the town owes its gaiety and its elegance, not to the private
villa, the rich man’s “showplace,” but to wise public expenditure of
the money which the bathers annually pour into its exchequer.
It was, however, rather for the sake of its surroundings than for
the study of its unfolding season, that we had come there; and the
neighbouring country offered the richest return for our enterprise.
From the plain of the Limagne the hills slope up behind Vichy in a
succession of terraces divided by streams and deeply-wooded glens, and
connected by the interlacing of admirable roads that civilises the
remotest rural districts of France. Climbing these gradual heights to
the hill-village of Ferrières, we had, the day after our arrival, our
first initiation into what the near future held for us--a glorious
vision, across the plain, of the Monts Dore and the Monts de Dôme.
The blue mountain haze that had drawn us steadily southward, from our
first glimpse of it on the heights of the Berry, now resolved itself
into a range of wild volcanic forms, some curved like the bell-shaped
apses of the churches of Auvergne, some slenderly cup-like, and
showing the hollow rim of the spent crater; all fantastic, individual,
indescribably differentiated in line and colour from mountain forms
of less violent origin. And between them and us lay the richest
contrasting landscape, the deep meadows and luxuriant woodlands of the
Allier vale, with here and there a volcanic knoll lifting on its crest
an old town or a Rhenish-looking castle. The landscape, thus viewed,
presents a perplexing mixture of suggestions, recalling now the brown
hill-villages of Umbria, now the robber castles of the Swiss Rhineland;
with a hint, again, of the Terra di Lavore in its bare mountain lines,
and the prodigal fertility of their lower slopes; so that one felt
one’s self moving in a confusion of scenes romantically combined, as in
the foreground of a Claude or a Wilson, for the greater pleasure of the
eclectic eye.
The only landscape that seems to have been excluded from the
composition is that of France; all through Auvergne, we never
felt ourselves in France. But that is, of course, merely because
the traveller’s France is apt to be mainly made up of bits of the
Ile-de-France and Normandy and Brittany; and not till one has
explored the central and southwestern provinces does one learn of the
countless Frances within France, and realise that one may find one’s
“Switzerland, one’s Italy” without crossing the Alps to reach them.
We had, the next day, a closer impression of the scene we had looked
down on from Ferrières; motoring first along the high ridge above
the Limagne to the ancient black hill-town of Thiers, and thence
descending again to the plain. Our way led across it, by the charming
castled town of Pont-de-Château, to Clermont-Ferrand, which spreads its
swarthy mass at the base of the Puy de Dôme--that strangest, sternest
of cities, all built and paved in the black volcanic stone of Volvic,
and crowned by the sinister splendour of its black cathedral. It was
Viollet-le-Duc who added the west front and towers to this high ancient
pile; and for once his rash hand was so happily inspired that, at the
first glimpse of his twin spires soaring above the roofs of Clermont,
one forgives him--for the moment--the wrong he did to Blois, to
Pierrefonds and Vézelay.
VI
IN AUVERGNE
At last we were really in Auvergne. On our balcony at Royat, just
under the flank of the Puy de Dôme, we found ourselves in close
communion with its tossed heights, its black towns, its threatening
castles. And Royat itself--even the dull new watering-place quarter--is
extremely characteristic of the region: hanging in a cleft of the great
volcanic upheaval, with hotels, villas, gardens, vineyards clutching
precariously at every ledge and fissure, as though just arrested in
their descent on the roofs of Clermont.
As a watering-place Royat is not an ornamental specimen of its class;
and it has the farther disadvantage of being connected with Clermont
by a long dusty suburb, noisy with tram-cars; but as a centre for
excursions it offers its good hotels and “modern conveniences” at the
precise spot most favourable to the motorist, who may radiate from it
upon almost every centre of interest in Auvergne, and return at night
to digestible food and clean beds--two requisites for which, in central
France, one is often doomed to pine.
Auvergne, one of the most interesting, and hitherto almost the least
known, of the old French provinces, offers two distinct and equally
striking sides to the appreciative traveller: on the one hand, its
remarkably individual church architecture, and on the other, the
no less personal character of its landscape. Almost all its towns
are distinguished by one of those ancient swarthy churches, with
western narthex, great central tower, and curious incrustations of
polychrome lava, which marked, in Auvergne, as strongly distinctive
an architectural impulse as flowered, on a vastly larger scale, and
a century or more later, in the Gothic of the Ile de France. And the
towns surrounding these churches, on the crest or flank of one of the
volcanic eminences springing from the plain--the towns themselves, with
their narrow perpendicular streets and tall black houses, are so darkly
individual, so plainly akin to the fierce predatory castles on the
neighbouring hills, that one is arrested at every turn by the desire
to follow up the obscure threads of history connecting them with this
little-known portion of the rich French past.
But to the traveller restricted by time, the other side of the
picture--its background, rather, of tormented blue peaks and
wide-spread forest--which must assert itself, at all seasons, quite as
distinctively as the historic and architectural character of the towns,
is likely, in May, to carry off the victory. We had come, at any rate,
with the modest purpose of taking a mere bird’s-eye view of the region,
such a flight across the scene as draws one back, later, to brood and
hover; and our sight of the landscape from the Royat balcony confirmed
us in the resolve to throw as sweeping a glance as possible, and defer
the study of details to our next--our already-projected!--visit.
The following morning, therefore, we set out early for the heart of the
Monts Dore. Our road carried us southward, along a series of ridges
above the wide Allier vale, and then up and down, over wild volcanic
hills, now densely wooded, now desolately bare. We were on the road
to Issoire and La Chaise Dieu, two of the most notable old towns of
southern Auvergne; but, in pursuit of scenery, we reluctantly turned
off at the village of Coudes, at the mouth of a lateral valley, and
struck up toward the western passes which lead to the Pic de Sancy.
Some miles up this valley, which follows the capricious windings of
the Couzes, lie the baths of Saint Nectaire-le-Bas, romantically
planted in a narrow defile, beneath the pyramidal Romanesque church
which the higher-lying original village lifts up on a steep splinter
of rock. The landscape beyond Saint Nectaire grows more rugged and
Alpine in character: the pastures have a Swiss look, and the shaggy
mountain-sides are clothed with a northern growth of beech and pine.
Presently, at a turn of the road, we came on the little crater-lake
of Chambon, its vivid blueness set in the greenest of meadows, and
overhung by the dark basalt cliff which carries on its summit the
fortified castle of Murols. The situation of Murols, lifted on its
shaft of rock above that lonely upland valley, is in itself impressive
enough to bring out the full value of such romantic suggestions as it
has to offer; and the monument is worthy of its site. It is in fact a
very noble ruin, raising its central keep above two outer circuits of
battered masonry, the ampler and later of which shows the classical
pilasters and large fenestration of what must have been one of the
stateliest specimens of the last stage of French feudal architecture.
Though the guidebooks record a mention of Murols as early as the
thirteenth century, the castle now standing is all of later date,
and the great rectangular exterior is an interesting example of the
transitional period when Italian palace architecture began to be
grafted on the rugged stock of French military construction.
Just beyond the lake of Chambon the road begins to mount the long
curves of the Col de Diane, the pass which leads over into the valley
of Mont Dore. As we rose through bleak meadows and patches of scant
woodland, the mountains of Auvergne unrolled themselves to the east
in one of those lonely tossing expanses of summit and ridge and chasm
that suggest the mysterious undulations of some uninhabited planet.
Though the Col de Diane is not a high pass, it gives, from its yoke,
a strangely memorable impression of distance and mystery; partly,
perhaps, because in that desert region there is neither village nor
house to break the labyrinth of peaks; but chiefly because of the
convulsed outlines into which they have been tossed by subterranean
fires.
A cold wind swept the top of the pass, and snow still lay under the
rocks by the roadside; so that it was cheering to the spirits, as well
as to the eye, when we presently began our descent through dark pine
forests into the vale of the Dordogne. The baths of Mont Dore lie
directly beneath the pass, at the mouth of a valley hollowed out of
the side of the Pic de Sancy, the highest peak in Auvergne. In spite
of milder air and bright spring foliage we were still distinctly in
high places; and Mont Dore itself, not yet decked for the entertainment
of its bathers, had the poverty-stricken look which everywhere marks
the real mountain village. Later, no doubt, when its hotels are
open, and its scanty gardens in bloom, it takes on a thin veneer of
frivolity; but it must always be an austere-looking village, with its
ill-kept cobble-stone streets, and gaunt stone houses grouped against
a background of Alpine pastures. We were not sorry, therefore, that
its few restaurants presented barred shutters to our mid-day hunger,
and that we were obliged to follow the first footsteps of the infant
Dordogne down the valley to the lower-lying baths of Bourboule.
The Dordogne is a child of lusty growth, and at its very leap from the
cradle, under the Pic de Sancy, it rolls a fine brown torrent beneath
steeply wooded banks. Its course led us rapidly down the mountain
glen to the amiable but somewhat characterless little watering-place
of La Bourboule, set in a depression of the hills, with a background
of slopes which, in summer, might offer fairly pleasant walks between
one’s douches; and here, at a fresh white hotel with an affable
landlady, we lunched on trout that must have leapt straight from the
Dordogne into the frying-pan.
[Illustration: ORCIVAL: THE CHURCH]
After luncheon we once more took our way along the lively curves of the
river; to part with them at last, reluctantly, a few miles down the
valley, and strike out across a dull plateau to the mountain town of
Laqueille--a gaunt wind-beaten place, with nothing of note to offer
except its splendid view from the dizzy verge of a high cornice which
overhangs the valley running south from the chain of the Dôme. Beyond
Laqueille, again, we began to descend by long windings; and at last,
turning off from the direct road to Royat, we engaged ourselves in a
series of wooded gorges, in search of the remote village of Orcival.
The church of Orcival is one of the most noted of that strange group
of Auvergnat churches which some students of French Romanesque are
disposed to attribute, not only to one brief period of time, but to
the hand of one architect; so closely are they allied, not alone in
plan and construction, but in their peculiar and original decorative
details. We had resolved, therefore, not to return to Royat without a
sight of Orcival; and spite of the misleading directions plentifully
bestowed on us by the way, and resulting in endless doublings through
narrow lonely glens, we finally came, in the neck of the last and
narrowest, upon a huddled group of stone roofs with a church rising
nobly above them.
Here it was at last--and our first glance told us how well worth the
search we had made for it. But a second made evident the disturbing
fact that a cattle-fair was going on in the village; and though this is
not an unusual event in French towns, or one calculated, in general, to
interfere with the movements of the sightseer, we soon saw that, owing
to the peculiar position of Orcival, which is jammed into the head of
its glen as tightly as a cork in a bottle, the occupation of the square
about the church formed a complete check to circulation.
And the square was fully occupied: it presented, as we descended on it,
an agitated surface of blue human backs, and dun and white bovine ones,
so closely and inextricably mixed that any impact from without merely
sent a wave across the mass, without making the slightest break in its
substance. On its edge, therefore, we halted; the church, with its
beautiful rounded _chevet_ and central pyramid-tower, islanded a few
yards away across a horned sea which divided it from us as hopelessly
as Egypt from Israel; and the waves of the sea setting toward us with
somewhat threatening intent at the least sign of our attempting to
cross it. There was therefore nothing to be done but to own ourselves
intruders, and defer a sight of Orcival till our next visit; and with
much backing and wriggling, and some unfavourable comment on the part
of the opposition, we effected a crestfallen exit from that interesting
but inhospitable village.
The road thence to Royat climbs over the long Col de Ceyssat, close
under the southern side of the Puy de Dôme, and we looked up longingly
at the bare top of the mountain, yearning to try the ascent, but
fearing that our “horse-power” was not pitched to such heights. That
adventure too was therefore deferred till our next visit, which every
renunciation of the kind was helping to bring nearer and make more
inevitable; and we pushed on to Royat across the plain of Laschamp,
noted in the records of motoring as the starting-point of the perilous
_circuit d’Auvergne_.
VII
ROYAT TO BOURGES
The term of our holiday was upon us and, stern necessity took us back,
the next day, to Vichy. We followed, this time, the road along the
western side of the Limagne, passing through the old towns of Riom
and Aigueperse. Riom, thanks to its broad boulevards and bright open
squares, struck us as the most cheerful and animated place we had seen
in Auvergne; and it has, besides, a great air of Renaissance elegance,
many of its old traceried hôtels having been built in the sixteenth
century, which saw the chief development of the town.
Aigueperse, on the contrary, spite of its situation in the same sunny
luxuriant plain, presents the morose aspect of the typical town of
Auvergne, without many compensating merits, save that of two striking
pictures of the Italian school which are to be seen in its modernised
cathedral. From Aigueperse our road struck eastward across the Limagne
to Gannat; and thence, through pleasant fields and woods, we returned
to Vichy, on the opposite edge of the plain.
We started early the next morning on our journey to the north, for
our slight experience of the inns of central France made us anxious
to reach Orléans by night. Such long runs cannot be made without the
sacrifice of much that charms and arrests one by the way; and this part
of the country should be seen at leisure, in the long summer days, when
the hotels are less sepulchrally damp, and when one can remain late out
of doors, instead of having to shiver through the evening hours around
a smoky oil-lamp, in a room which will not bear inspection even by that
inadequate light.
We suffered, I remember, many pangs by the way; and not least, that of
having to take as a mere parenthesis the charmingly complete little
town of La Palisse on the Bèbre, with the ruined ivied castle of the
Comtes de Chabannes overhanging a curve of the river, and grouping
itself in a memorable composition with the picturesque houses below it.
Farther north, again, Moulins on the Allier inflicted a still deeper
pang; for this fine old town has considerable claims to distinction
besides the great triptych that made its name known through Europe
after the recent exhibition of French Primitives in Paris. The Virgin
of Moulins, gloriously enthroned in the cathedral among her soft-faced
Lombard angels, remains undoubtedly the crowning ornament of the town,
if only on account of the problem which she holds out, so inscrutably,
to explorers of the baffling annals of early French art. But aside
from this preëminent possession, and the interest of several minor
relics, Moulins has the attraction of its own amiable and distinguished
physiognomy. With its streets of light-coloured stone, its handsome
eighteenth-century hôtels and broad well-paved _cours_, it seemed,
after the grim black towns of the south, a singularly open and cheerful
place; and one was conscious, behind the handsome stone gateways and
balconied façades, of the existence of old panelled drawing-rooms with
pastel portraits and faded tapestry furniture.
The approach to Nevers, the old capital of the Nivernais, carried
us abruptly back to the Middle Ages, but to an exuberant northern
mediævalism far removed from the Gallo-Roman tradition of central
France. The cathedral of Nevers, with its ornate portals and
fantastically decorated clock-tower, has, in the old ducal palace
across the square, a rival more than capable of meeting its challenge
on equal grounds: a building of really gallant exterior, with fine
angle towers, and within, a great staircase commemorating in luxuriant
sculpture the legendary beginnings of that ancient house of Cleves
which, in the fifteenth century, allied itself by marriage with the
dukes of Burgundy.
At Nevers we found ourselves once more on the Loire; but only to
break from it again in a long dash across country to Bourges. At this
point we left behind us the charming diversified scenery which had
accompanied us to the borders of the Loire, and entered on a region
of low monotonous undulations, flattening out gradually into the vast
wheat-fields about Bourges. But who would wish any other setting
for that memorable silhouette, throned, from whichever point of the
compass one approaches it, in such proud isolation above the plain? One
forgets even, in a distant view of Bourges, that nature has helped, by
an opportune rise of the ground, to lift the cathedral to its singular
eminence: the hill, and the town upon it, seem so merely the unremarked
pedestal of the monument. It is not till one climbs the steep street
leading up from the Place Saint Bonnet that one realises the peculiar
topographical advantages of such a site; advantages which perhaps
partly account for the overwhelming and not quite explicable effect of
a first sight of the cathedral.
[Illustration: MOULINS: PLACE DE L’HÔTEL-DE-VILLE AND THE JACQUEMART
TOWER]
Even now, on a second visit, with the great monuments of the Ile
de France fresh in memory, we felt the same effect, and the same
difficulty in running it down, in differentiating it from the
richer, yet perhaps less deeply Gothic impression produced by the
rival churches of the north. For, begin as one will by admitting, by
insisting upon, the defects of Bourges--its irregular inharmonious
façade, its thin piers, its mean outer aisles--one yet ends in a state
where criticism perforce yields to sensation, where one surrenders
one’s self wholly to the spell of its spiritual suggestion. Certainly
it would be hard to put a finger, either within or without, on the
specific tangible cause of this feeling. Is it to be found in the
extraordinary beauty of the five western portals, so crowded with noble
and pathetic imagery and delicate ornamental detail? But the doors
of Chartres surpass even these! Is it then, if one looks within, the
rich blue and red of its dense ancient glass? But Chartres, again, has
finer glass of that unmatched period. Is it the long clear sweep of
the nave and aisles, uninterrupted by the cross-lines of transept or
chancel-screen? But if one recalls the wonderful convolutions of the
ambulatory of Canterbury, one has to confess that Gothic art--even in
its conventionalised English form--has created curves of greater poetry
and mystery, produced a more thrilling sense of shadowy consecrated
distances. Perhaps the spell of Bourges resides in a fortunate
accidental mingling of many of the qualities that predominate in this
or that more perfect structure--in the mixing of the ingredients so
that there rises from them, as one stands in one of the lofty inner
aisles, with one’s face toward the choir, that breath of mystical
devotion which issues from the very heart of mediæval Christianity.
“With this sweetness,” wrote Saint Theresa, of the Prayer of Quiet,
“the whole inner and outer man seems to be delighted, as though
some delicious ointment were poured into the soul like an exquisite
perfume ... as if we suddenly came to a place where it is exhaled,
not only from one, but from many things; and we know not what it is,
or from which one of them it comes, but they all penetrate us”.... If
Amiens, in its harmony of conception and vigour of execution, seems
to embody the developing will-power of a people passionate in belief,
and indomitable in the concrete expression of their creed, here at
Bourges one feels that other, less expressible side of the great ruling
influence of the Middle Ages--the power that willed mighty monuments
and built them, yet also, even in its moments of most brutal material
ascendancy, created the other houses, not built with hands, where the
spirits of the saints might dwell.