XXIII. Ypres

One morning early in December I was asked by Dr. Munro to

run down with him in one of our motors to Ypres. A message

had arrived saying that the town had been heavily shelled

during the night, and that there were a number of children and

of wounded there, who ought if possible to be removed to some

less dangerous situation. So we started off to see what we

could do for them. It was a dismal morning, and the rain was

coming down in a steady drizzle which continued all day long,

but fortunately we had a closed car, and we were protected

from the elements. The road to Ypres is a broad avenue between

long lines of tall trees, and to-day it was crowded with soldiers and

transport motors. The French were moving up a large number of

men to relieve and to support their lines between Dixmude and

Ypres. Every little village seemed to be crowded with troops, for

in this weather "the poorest village is better than the best

bivouac," and the contrasts of the uniforms were very striking.

Every type was represented--the smart French officer, the

Zouave, the Turco, and the Arab, and one could not help

wondering what the Senegalese and the Algerians thought

of this soaking rain, or how they would fare in the rigours

of a Belgian winter.

Like so many of the towns of Belgium, Ypres is a town of the

past, and it is only in the light of its history that the meaning of

its wonderful buildings can be realized, or an estimate formed of

the vandalism of its destroyers. Its records date back to the

year 900, and in the twelfth century it was already famous for its

cloth. By the thirteenth century it was the richest and the most

powerful city in Flanders, and four thousand looms gave

occupation to its two hundred thousand inhabitants. These

great commercial cities were also great military organizations,

and there were few wars in the turbulence of the Middle Ages in

which Ypres did not have a share. In fact, it was almost always

engaged in fighting either England, or France, or one of the

other Flemish towns.

After a century of wars, to which Ypres once contributed no

fewer than five thousand troops, the town was besieged by the

English, led by Henry Spencer, Bishop of Norwich, with the help

of the burghers of Ghent and Bruges. The town was surrounded

by earthen ramparts planted with thick hedges of thorn, and by

wide ditches and wooden palisades, and these were held by

some ten thousand men. They were attacked, in 1383, by seventeen

thousand English and twenty thousand Flemish. For two months Ypres

was defended against almost daily attacks in one of the fiercest and

most bloody sieges in history. At last Spencer saw that it was

impossible to take the town by assault, and in view of the advance

of a large French army he withdrew. Ypres was saved, but its

prosperity was gone, for the bulk of its population had fled.

The suburbs, where large numbers of the weavers worked,

had been destroyed by the besiegers and the looms had been

burnt. The tide of trade turned to Bruges and Ghent, though they

did not enjoy for long the prosperity they had stolen.

The commercial madness of the fourteenth century gave way to

the religious madness of the sixteenth. Men's ideas were

changing, and it is a very dangerous thing to change the ideas

of men. For the momentum of the change is out of all proportion

to its importance, and the barriers of human reason may melt

before it. It is a mere matter of historical fact that no oppression

has half the dangers of an obvious reform. At Ypres the

Reformers were first in the field. They had swept through

Flanders, destroying all the beauty and wealth that the piety of

ages had accumulated, and here was rich plunder for these

apostles of the ugly. There is real tragedy in the thought that the

Reformer is sometimes sincere.

But at least the fanatics limited their fury to the symbols of

religion. Philip of Spain could only be sated by flesh and blood,

and for the next fifteen years Ypres was tossed to and fro in an

orgy of persecution and war such as have rarely been waged

even in the name of religion. At the end of that time only a

miserable five thousand inhabitants remained within its broken

ramparts.

With the seventeenth century commerce and religion made way

for politics, and the wars of Louis XIV. fell heavily on Ypres. On

four separate occasions the town was taken by the French, and

the dismantled fortifications which still surround it were once an

example of the genius of Vauban. Yet with all these wars--

commercial, religious, political--with all the violence of its

history, Ypres had kept intact the glorious monuments of the

days of her greatness, and it has been left for the armies of

Culture to destroy that which even the hand of Philip spared.

The centuries have handed down to us few buildings of such

massive grandeur as the great Cloth Hall, a monument of the

days when the Weavers of Ypres treated on equal terms with

the Powers of England and of France. This huge fortress of the

Guilds is about a hundred and fifty yards long. The ground floor

was once an open loggia, but the spaces between its fifty pillars

have been filled in. Above this are two rows of pointed windows,

each exactly above an opening below. In the upper row every

second window has been formed into a niche for the figure of

some celebrity in the history of the town. A delicate turret rises

at each end of the facade, and above it rose the high-pitched

roof which was one of the most beautiful features of the

building. In the centre is the great square tower, reaching to a

height of more than two hundred feet, and ending in an elegant

belfry, which rises between its four graceful turrets. The whole

of this pile was finished in 1304; but in the seventeenth century

there was added at its eastern end the Nieuwerck, an exquisite

Renaissance structure supported entirely on a row of slim

columns, with tiers of narrow oblong windows, and with elaborate

gables of carved stone. The contrast between the strength and

simplicity of the Gothic and the rich decoration of Spain is as

delightful as it is bold. The upper part of this vast building formed

one great hall, covered overhead by the towering roof. The walls

were decorated by painted panels representing the history of

the town, and so large were these that in one bay there was

erected the entire front of an old wooden house which had

been pulled down in the town, gable and all.

And all this is a heap of ruins. Whether any portion of it can

ever be repaired I do not know, but the cost would be fabulous.

The roof is entirely destroyed, and with it the whole of the great

gallery and its paintings, for fire consumed what the shells had

left. Only the bare stone walls remain, and as we stood among

the pillars which had supported the floors above, it was difficult

to realize that the heap of rubbish around us was all that was

left of what had once been the envy of Europe. The only

building which we have at all comparable to the Cloth Hall is the

Palace of Westminster. If it were blasted by shells and gutted

by fire, we might regret it, but what would be our feelings if it

were the legacy of Edward the First, and had been handed

down to us intact through six centuries?

Behind the Cloth Hall stands the Church of St. Martin, once for

two and a half centuries the Cathedral of Ypres. It was largely

built at the same time as the Cloth Hall, and it is a glorious

monument of the architecture of the thirteenth century. Perhaps

its most beautiful features are the great square tower, the lofty

and imposing nave, and the exquisite rose window in the south

wall of the transept, which is said to be the finest in Belgium.

The tower was surrounded with scaffolding, and around its base

were piles of stone, for the church was being repaired when the

war began. I wonder if it will ever be repaired now. The

Germans had expended on its destruction many of their largest

shells, and they had been very successful in their efforts. There

were three huge holes in the roof of the choir where shells had

entered, and in the centre of the transept was a pile of bricks

and stone six feet high. Part of the tower had been shot away,

and its stability was uncertain. The beautiful glass of the rose

window had been utterly destroyed, and part of the tracery was

broken. The old Parish Chapel on the south side of the nave

had nothing left but the altar and four bare walls. The fine old

roof and the great bronze screen which separated it from the

nave had perished in the flames. The screen was lying in small

fragments amongst the rubbish on the chapel floor, and at first I

thought they were bits of rusty iron.

As I stood in the ruins of the Parish Chapel looking round on

this amazing scene, there was a roar overhead, and one of the

big 14-inch shells passed, to explode with a terrific crash

amongst the houses a few hundred yards farther on. It was

plain that the bombardment was beginning again, and that we

must see to our business without any delay. Two more shells

passed overhead as I came out of the church, with a roar very

different from the soft whistle of a small shell. The destruction

produced by one of these large shells is astonishing. One large

house into which a shell had fallen in the previous night had

simply crumpled up. Portions of the walls and a heap of bricks

were all that was left, a bit of an iron bedstead and a fragment

of staircase sticking out from the debris. The roof, the floors,

and the greater part of the walls might never have existed. In

the Place in front of the Cathedral were two holes where shells

had fallen, and either of them would have comfortably held a

motor-car. The children were all together in a little street a

quarter of a mile west of the Cathedral, just where the last three

shells had fallen. Fortunately they had hurt no one, though one

had passed clean through the upper stories of a house where

there were several children being got ready by one of our party

for removal. By good luck through some defect it did not

explode, or the house would have been annihilated and everyone

in it killed. Quite a collection of people had congregated in that

little street, though why they considered it safer than the rest

of the town I do not know. At first they were very unwilling to

let any of the children go at all. But at last about twenty children

were collected and were packed into ambulances. Some of them

were without parents, and were being looked after by the

neighbours, and the parents of some absolutely refused to

leave. More children and a few adults to look after them were

found later, and I think that in the end about a hundred were

taken up to Fumes, to be sent on to Calais as refugees.

The children were as merry as crickets, and regarded it all as a

huge joke; sitting in the ambulances, they looked for all the

world like a school treat. But I have often wondered whether we

were right to take them away or whether it would not have been

better to have left them to take their chance. War is a very

terrible thing, and the well-meant interference of the kind-

hearted may do far more harm than good. What is going to

happen to those children? I suppose that they are in some

refugee home, to remain there till the war is over. And then?

We did our best to identify them, but what are the chances that

many of them will ever see their parents again? From what I

have seen of these things I do not think that they are very large.

Perhaps you will say that the parents ought to have gone with

them. It is easy for the well-to-do to leave their homes and to

settle again elsewhere; but the poorer a man is the less can he

afford to leave what little he possesses. In their own town they

might be in danger, but at least they had not lost their homes,

and they possessed the surroundings without which their

individual lives would be merged in the common ocean of

misery. The problem of the civil population, and especially of

the children, in time of war is entirely beyond the scope of

individual effort. It is a matter with which only a Government or a

very powerful organization can deal, and it is a matter in which

Governments do not take a great deal of interest. Their hands

are quite full enough in trying to defeat the enemy.

In all previous wars between civilized nations a certain regard

has been paid to the safety of the civilian population, and

especially of the women and children. But from the very first the

German policy has been to utterly ignore the rights of non-

combatants, tearing up the conventions which they themselves

had signed for their protection. No Government could be

expected to be prepared for such a total apostasy from the

elementary principles of civilized society, or to anticipate

methods at which a Zulu might blush. If they had done so, it

should have been their first care to remove all non-combatants

from the area of fighting, and to make provision for them

elsewhere. It is unfair that a civilian should be left with the

hopeless choice of leaving a child in a house where it may at

any moment be killed by a shell or taking it away with a

considerable probability that it will be a homeless orphan. For

life is a matter of small moment; it is living that matters.

The problem of the children of Belgium will be one of the most

serious to be faced when the war is over. There will be a great

number of orphans, whilst many more will be simply lost. They

must not be adopted in England, for to them Belgium will look

for her future population. There could be few finer ways in which

we could show our gratitude to the people of Belgium than by

establishing colonies over there where they could be brought

up in their own country, to be its future citizens. It would form a

bond between the two countries such as no treaty could ever

establish, and Belgium would never forget the country which

had been the foster-mother of her children.

But Ypres gave us yet another example of German methods of

war. On the western side of the town, some distance from the

farthest houses, stood the Asylum. It was a fine building

arranged in several wings, and at present it was being used for

the accommodation of a few wounded, mostly women and children,

and several old people of the workhouse infirmary type. It made

a magnificent hospital, and as it was far away from the town and

was not used for any but the purposes of a hospital, we considered

that it was safe enough, and that it would be a pity to disturb the

poor old people collected there. We might have known better.

The very next night the Germans shelled it to pieces, and all

those unfortunate creatures had to be removed in a hurry.

There is a senseless barbarity about such an act which could

only appeal to a Prussian.

A Surgeon in Belgium · 第 28 / 29 题