HENRY MORE, THE PLATONIST

About the middle of the seventeenth century, Hobbes and Descartes,

clear-headed and unprejudiced thinkers, caused a kind of panic in the

devotional world: they resolved that they would not take anything for

granted. Starting from a Socratic ignorance, they determined to verify,

to try (and it was time) if they could not find a little firm ground

among the vast and bewildering mass of rash dogmas and unsupported

assertions that lumbered the scene of thought. Such an attempt cut very

hard at Revelation. The religious fabric was so perilously

elaborate--the removal of a brick was likely to set so much

tumbling--its defenders felt themselves bound to believe that the part

was as important, if not more so, than the whole; and they had pledged

themselves so widely and rashly that they made no attempt at organised

rational resistance, but attempted to overwhelm the rough intruders with

torrents of solemn imprecations.

But there were in many places earnest-minded, faithful thinkers,

profoundly attached to the revealed truths, who saw another way open.

Authorities and ancient names were being called into court; philosophers

who had written from a Christian point of view were supposed to speak

professionally; a daring thought struck them: what if they could trace a

connection between the earlier sources of Revelation and the noblest

name that philosophy had ever enrolled? What if they could show that

Plato himself owed his highest ideas to the transient influence of that

teaching--the Law of Moses--which they themselves possessed in the

entirety of a broad development? Pythagoras was said to have sojourned

on Carmel and interviewed the priests of Jehovah; the Cabbala--the Law

embroidered by metaphysical and mystical minds--was in their hands, and

even their adversaries would "allow to Plato the spiritual insight that

they denied to St. Paul."

At Cambridge this idea took shape in four remarkable minds: Dr.

Cudworth, Master of Clare and afterwards of Christ's, Dr. Whichcote,

Provost of King's, John Smith, Fellow of Queen's, and Dr. Henry More,

Fellow of Christ's, applied themselves to the solution of the problem.

The interest of the situation lies in the fact that these men were pure

and devoted beyond measure in life as well as in thought. Smith did more

by direct influence and personal weight than even by his "Select

Discourses." Dr. Patrick at his death preached on the cry of Elisha,

"My father, my father, the chariot of Israel and the horses thereof:" he

said that a light had been extinguished in Israel. Cudworth had perhaps

the most logical mind. He wrote an "Intellectual System" that was

supposed to give Hobbes a death-blow. Whichcote wrote discourses

delivered at St. Laurence, Jewry, and originated an immense mass of

aphorisms, afterwards published.

But, of the four, More was the man of genius: he was divinely gifted in

body and mind; with passionate earnestness he combined humour and

delicacy of thought, a trick of suggestive style, and a personality at

once genial and commanding. The following pages profess to give a slight

account of him.

The movement had unhappily no coherence. We class the four together as

Cambridge Platonists because they were possessed by the same idea and

worked it out on individual lines; but they did not write or think in

concert. They were acquaintances--More and Cudworth close friends, and

Whichcote died in Cudworth's house--but it can never have occurred to

them that their names would have been connected in later times, because

they had no scheme of concerted action,--they originated no movement.

Their unique interest lies in this--that, in an age when both religion

and philosophy were making huge strides into materialism, they

discerned and strove to indicate this truth,--that the capacity in the

human soul of conceiving ideals, and in part transfusing them into life,

is at once its highest boast and the most potent factor of its eternal

quest.

Henry More was the son of a gentleman who lived near Grantham on a small

estate of his own. The principles of the family were those of the

straitest Calvinism, though sufficiently cultivated for the father to

read the "Faerie Queene" aloud in the evenings; and the boy, after being

carefully trained in a private school, kept by a master of this

persuasion, was sent to Eton, with strict injunctions from his father

and uncle to hold to the faith delivered by Calvin to the Saints.

But the boy's instinct for philosophy was greater than his loyalty to

family principles. He had, moreover, none of that gloomy and

business-like habit of mind that demanded an accurate and severe

disposal of the future of the entire human race as the basis for a

creed. Though melancholy as a boy, he had the beginnings of that serene

and even temperament, that afterwards was so conspicuous. He was

immaturely an optimist: the beauty and kindliness of the world occupied

a large share in his thoughts; and, when his elder brother came down to

see him at Eton, he maintained the brutal inadequacy of

Predestinarianism so strongly, that his uncle, to whom this scandalous

position was reported, fell back upon threats of personal chastisement.

He gives us a strange picture of himself at Eton, walking slowly in the

Playing Fields while his comrades were at their games, with his head on

one side, kicking the stones with his feet, while he murmured to himself

the lines of Claudian:

Saepe mihi dubiam traxit sententia mentem;

Curarent Superi terras; an nullus inesset

Rector, et incerto fluerent mortalia casu.

Such a precocious, anxious childhood is generally, alas! only a sign of

deficient vitality--a disposition to embrace a religious life and die

early; but the event proved a singular contradiction to this.

More was, it seems, a lovable lad--very simple-minded and sweet;

resolving that, should the horrid phantom of inevitable destruction be

true, should he be destined to that bitter place, yet that he would even

there behave himself with such submissive patience that God should not

have the heart to keep him there. In his studies he made great progress,

troubled more than elated by success, because he was too diffident to

believe anything in his triumphs but that he would break down next time.

The Provost of Eton at that time was Sir Henry Wotton--ambassador,

courtier, poet, and philosopher. It was an encouraging and stimulating

time to be at the school, for Sir Henry, with his romantic past and his

courtly, affectionate manners, must have been a fascinating figure for

the boys; and he was, moreover, fond of their society; had constantly

one or two about him; put up pictures of great orators and statesmen in

their schoolroom; and used frequently to walk in to their lessons, never

leaving the room without dropping some aphorism or epigram worthy of a

place in the memory of a growing scholar.

At the age of seventeen More went up to Christ's College, Cambridge,

just at the time when Milton was leaving it; and at his earnest desire

was entered under a tutor that was not a Calvinist. On getting

established at Cambridge he found himself in an atmosphere, which then,

at least, teemed with inducements to study, for the studious. There was

little of the social life of a modern university--hours were longer,

earlier, and more regularly kept; there was no prejudice in favour of

bodily exercise as a means of improving health: for the more absorbed

students a turn in the cloisters as a remedy for cold feet was deemed

sufficient--the fen invaded Cambridge on every side; the wild birds

screamed in the pools, and snipe were snared where Downing now stands.

The high-road to Ely was fenced from the marsh by a few farms, and the

ruins--still ugly--of a religious house; beyond Ely lay the

interminable lagoons, with here and there an island farm.

In going to Cambridge, a scholar who meant to use the place, did not go

with any idea of enjoying life in ordinary ways, of finding society, of

amusing himself: no, he went where there were honest, silent,

like-minded men, too intent on study to do more than occasionally

discuss the subjects with which they were grappling, or give the young

student a word of encouragement--_alere flammam_; and besides this, a

plain but adequate living, food and shelter, books and lectures--and all

not without a certain severe grace and dignity--grace thrown over life

by the stately courts of grey stone, retired gardens full of grassy

butts and old standard trees, grave parlours and venerable halls, talks

in galleries or cloisters; and for the young hearts that gathered there

the unvarying march of the seasons: the orchards whitening and blushing

over the stately stone walls of college gardens; the plunge of the water

in the fountain, the snow on the ground throwing up mysterious light on

to the ceilings of studious chambers, and choking the familiar street

sounds; or there was some great preacher to hear; my lord of Ely

travelling post-haste through the town with his long train of servants

and gentlemen, and just stopping for compliments and refreshment at a

Lodge, or the grave figures of the doctors, passing through the street,

to be watched with bated breath and whispered names; some scholar, with

worn spiritual aspect, stealing from his rooms, some nobleman with his

flourishing following; or, best of all, the quiet services in the dark

chapel, the droning bell ceasing high in the roof, the growing thunder

of the organ, the flickering lights, and the master moving to his stall,

accompanied by some scholar or writer of mighty name; and then the

liturgy, the reviving in prayer and meditation of the old ideals, the

thankful consciousness that God could so easily be sought and found.

Into this quiet society More was lovingly received, and it gave him deep

content. He plunged into his studies with a kind of fury, like a man

transported, digging for treasure; and one day it happened that his

father came upon him unexpectedly as he sat with all his books about

him, and, being rapturously delighted with the serious intentness of the

young man, used a curious phrase about him, suggested no doubt by a

certain glory, hardly human, transfiguring the boy's face, "That he

spent his time in an angelical way," and then this old Puritan, to mark

his sense of satisfaction by some practical testimony, went home and

wrote the lad down for a handsome legacy in his will, in token of

complete reconciliation: and this legacy was never revoked; but it moved

Henry's heart when he discovered it, as the surest sign that he had

been forgiven, knowing his father's concrete mode of thought as he did.

He tells us that his tutor, when he first arrived, received him kindly,

and asked him, after some talk, observing the boy's melancholy and

thoughtful disposition, whether he had a discernment of things good and

evil, to which he replied in a low voice, "I hope I have." He says that

as he uttered this he was all the time conscious of being the possessor

of a singularly sensitive discrimination in these matters, and besides

of an insatiable and burning curiosity after all kinds of knowledge.

This, however, his diffidence did not allow him to confess. The tutor

seems to have watched him carefully, for not long after, seeing his

intense and unflagging zeal in study, he asked him rather brusquely why

he was so intent on his work, hinting that mere ambition, if that were

the motive, was too low an end. On this he confessed that his only aim

was knowledge, an aim in itself. The mere consciousness of knowledge was

exquisitely pleasurable to him.

Until he took his B.A. in 1635 he occupied himself chiefly in the works

of the natural philosophers--Aristotle, Cardan, and Julius Scaliger; but

they were a bitter disappointment to him. Their acute and solid

observations pleased him, but they seemed to make hasty and obscure

assertions on very trivial grounds; and he became a complete sceptic.

Not, says Tulloch, as he carefully tells us, regarding the existence of

God, or the duties of morality--"for of these he never had the least

doubt"--but regarding the origin and end of life. This step he recorded,

as his habit was, in a double quatrain of elegiacs, a metre to which he

more than once resorted to summarise the turning-points of his career.

Being now able to please himself, he attacked the Platonists--not only

Plato himself, but Plotinus and his followers--and gradually he was led

to doubt the serious value of mere knowledge. Down into the valley of

humiliation he stept; in the bitterness of the fruit of the intellect he

could presume to believe, for he had tasted of it and strenuously

bruised the savour from it,--and he came to see that it is not the

origin and method of life, but life itself that it behoves the true man

to know.

That was the point at which so many of his contemporaries were stopping

all round him; they, too, had penetrated the secrets of the mind. A few

of them, more enthusiastic, continued to pursue it: the others,

mistaking the sensuous region for the higher way, fell back on life in

its grosser forms; they ate and drank, they buried themselves in local

politics and temporary interests. Such things had no charm for More; he

pushed through and out into a purer air.

The mysterious and fascinating doctrine of the divine illumination

opened before him--uncleanness of spirit, not distance of place, he

said, divide men from God: to purge the mind from vice and impurity and

the subtle temptations of sense, so as to leave the spiritual eye clear

and undimmed--this holy art of life became his dream.

There fell into his hands Tauler's "Theologia Germanica," that precious

treatise that, through similitudes, spoke so clearly of God; the work

that had been so beloved of Luther. It spoke of the surrender of the

will to God--the loosing it from selfish impulses to sail like a ship

upon the free sea--the nameless but unerring instinct that falls upon

the soul if such a course is faithfully pursued.

He awoke like a man out of sleep, and the conflict began. The old man,

which, like Proteus, assumes so many and so bewildering shapes, stood

revealed: but the struggle was a matter of time, though sharp at first,

so clearly was the truth grasped; and this growing purity and simplicity

of mind which he discovered, together with a superhuman assurance, which

began to stir and rise within him, constitute what may be called his

conversion. Another quatrain records this:

I come from Heaven, am an immortal ray

Of God; O joy! and back to God shall go.

And here sweet love on wings me up doth stay.

I live, I'm sure; and joy this life to know.

Night and vain dreams begone--Father of lights,

We live, as Thou, clad with eternal day.

Faith, wisdom, love, fixed joy, free winged might--

This is true life: all else death and decay.

He wrote also to record this a long mystical poem, called _Psychozoia_

(Life of the Soul), in 1640, at the age of twenty-six. He was flooded

with a perpetual content.

In the pursuit of mysticism there are often several painful facts to

record. In the first place, it is common to find a mystical temperament

in those whose physical nature is not very strong or passionate. It

seems as if certain natures, by the very fact that the ties which hold

them to the earth are more than half-loosened already, have a strong

affinity to the world of abstractions--as if the very weakness of their

corporeal organisation held open a door through which strange shapes are

seen moving, and airy voices heard to call; and again the mystical life

is, more than any other, subject to deep depressions of spirit, dumb

insensibilities, and heavy overshadowings from the towers of death. In

the history of More's life no trace of either of these failings can be

even faintly discovered. In the first place, he was of a strong and

sound constitution; he did not know what it was to be languid or out of

health; he was gifted with an extraordinary spring and plenty of pure

animal spirits--"a rich ethereal sort of body, for what was inward," to

use his own Pythagorean phrase; he says of himself that his body seemed

built for a hundred years; that he had a high warmth and activity of

thought that never flagged--notably too, that, after a long day of

incessant thought, when he came to sleep he had a strange sort of

narcotic power; and he was no sooner in a manner laid on his bed, that

the falling of a house would scarce wake him, and that he woke in the

morning to an inexpressible life and vigour, so that his thoughts and

notions "rayed" about him.

There would seem to be little of the visionary here; and yet he

confesses to a consciousness of what he calls "Enthusiasm"--which we

should almost call madness: he could summon up a material object with

such distinctness--visualise it, as it is now called--that it produced

on him all the sensations of being seen with the outward eye: that is,

he could at any moment, with his eyes open, command a scene or a person,

so that the vision passed before and effaced the furniture of his room

or the page of his book: and he says that all his life he could, with an

almost inconsiderable effort of the will, fix his mind so intently on

any subject or line of thought that he could spend as much as three

hours in an intent uninterrupted reverie.

Such a man would be sure to fling himself with rapture into ascetic and

mortifying practices--and so he did: the result was a prolonged

exaltation of soul, apparently unaccompanied by any symptoms of

exhaustion and depression, which is almost miraculous. One reverie,

which he records, lasted for fifteen days, during which he slept and

rose, ate and drank, went about his ordinary business, without, he

asserts, any one suspecting that he was all the time occupied in a

serene and rapturous contemplation. In this "lazy activity," he said,

"he passed from notion to notion without any perceptible images or words

in the mind;" as he walked in the street he could have fallen, he said,

and kissed the stones for joy; when playing the theorbo, for he had

considerable musical talent, he says that he sometimes became almost mad

with pleasure--so overcome that he was forced to desist.

"I am not out of my wits [as he writes in a touching passage in one of

his mystical dialogues] in this divine freedom, for God does not ride me

as a horse, and guide me I know not whither, but converseth with me as a

friend: I sport with the beasts of the earth; the lion licks my hand

like a spaniel; the serpent sleeps upon my lap and stings me not. I play

with the fowls of heaven, and the birds of air sit singing upon my fist.

Thou canst call down the moon so near thee by thy magic charm that thou

mayst kiss her, as she is said to have kissed Endymion--or control and

stop the course of the sun; or, with one stamp of thy foot, stay the

motion of the earth.

"He that is come hither, God hath taken him to be His own familiar

friend; and though He speaks to others aloof off, in outward religions

and parables, yet He leads this man by the hand, teaching him

intelligible documents upon all the objects of His providence: speaks to

him plainly in His own language, sweetly insinuates Himself and

possesseth all his faculties, understanding, reason, and memory. This is

the darling of God, and a prince among men, far above the dispensation

of either miracle or prophet."

There is no figure in literature that comes very close to this, except

the solemn form of Prospero in the enchanted land:

The isle is full of noises.

Sounds and sweet airs, that give delight and hurt not.

Henry More's life was a very simple one. His private means were large;

we hear of his possessing the advowson of a living in Lincolnshire,

Ingoldsby, to which he presented Mr. Ward, who wrote his life, and a

large farm in the same county; he had also other sources of income. Thus

he had no temptation to seek for wealth, or for preferment for the sake

of wealth, since his tastes were extraordinarily simple. He did, as a

matter of fact, give very largely in charity; his door, it was said,

was like the door of an hospital; indeed, he was so liberal with his

money, that in later life he made over to a nephew, Gabriel More, who

had fallen into misfortunes through no fault of his own, not only his

Lincolnshire estates, but a large legacy which he received from Lady

Conway.

He was elected a Fellow of Christ's soon after taking his M.A. degree:

his solitary and contemplative habits, his ascetic practices--for these,

though not marked, were sure to be discussed in so small and intimate a

society as a college--and the slight suspicion of fanaticism that he

incurred, led some to doubt whether he would not be a melancholy

addition to the Combination Room; but those who knew him better assured

the authorities that, though he was studious and serious, yet he was a

very pleasant companion, and in his way one of the merriest Greeks they

were acquainted with.

He was offered several important posts. Great efforts were made to get

him over to Ireland. On one occasion he was offered the Deanery of

Christ Church, Dublin, and on another occasion the Provostship of

Trinity College combined with the Deanery of St. Patrick's; as he never

even considered these for a moment, he was offered two Irish Bishoprics

in succession, the Lord-Lieutenant writing to him to press his

acceptance of the latter. "Pray be not so morose or humoursome," he

wrote, "as to refuse all things you have not known so long as Christ's

College."

Once even he was offered an English Bishopric, and his friends got him

as far as Whitehall to kiss hands, but they concealed the real object of

their designs, and when he understood it, he was not on any account to

be persuaded.

Late in life he accepted a prebend at Gloucester, urgently pressed on

him by Heneage Finch, Earl of Nottingham, the Lord Chancellor, brother

of an old pupil, but he resigned it almost immediately in favour of one

of his friends; and once, too, the Fellows offered to elect him to the

Mastership of Christ's, when it fell vacant, but this also he declined.

He was tutor of the College for a time, and was brought thus into close

relations with Sir John Finch, afterwards Ambassador to Turkey, younger

brother of Lord Nottingham, then an undergraduate. Finch's sister, Lady

Conway, had been converted to the tenets of the Quakers, and Henry More,

whose interest in his pupil extended itself to his pupil's sister,

laboured to reclaim her for several years; he was thus brought into

contact with Penn and the leaders of the Quietist party.

Lady Conway, the original of Lady Cardiff in "John Inglesant," was

afflicted by mysterious and incurable pains in the head, and not only

travelled to consult physicians, but was accustomed to assemble quacks

and specialists in her house at Ragley; there More spent most of his

time, and composed several books at her ladyship's special request.

There, too, he met the faith-healer Greatrakes, a moody man who had

lived for some time in seclusion at his own ruined castle of Capperquin

in Ireland; as well as the famous Van Helmont, Baron of Austria, Quaker

and physician, son of the famous chemist of the same name. This man was

all that Greatrakes was not; he had considerable medical skill, and a

quiet pious character. To us the union of the preacher and physician is

somewhat repugnant. We take it to mean that a man supplies the gaps in

his practical knowledge by the pretensions of spiritual insight; we

believe him to be proficient in neither. Van Helmont, however, seems to

have been a genuine man, and to suffer from an undeserved contempt. As a

matter of fact the possession of keen moral insight and sympathy is one

of the most powerful instruments that a physician can claim; the

physical and mental constitution react so invariably, that without it a

man must be at a loss; the healing art need not necessarily halt at the

threshold of hypochondria.

As I have touched on Lady Conway and Van Helmont, I may as well follow

out the part that Henry More plays in that fascinating romance--_John

Inglesant_. The life and works, down even to the style and mode of

expression, of Henry More have interested and influenced Mr. Shorthouse

very strongly. I have heard the conversation between John Inglesant and

Dr. More, which is said to have taken place at Oulton, instanced as an

admirable _tour de force_ of Mr. Shorthouse's style. The fact is that

Henry More speaks there, not in character, but actually; nearly

three-quarters of the conversation being sentences and aphorisms

extracted straight from More's works. It is very ingeniously done,

though a little too elaborate to be lifelike when regarded as

conversation.

But the effects of Henry More's writings are traceable in several other

parts of _John Inglesant_. In the conversation to which I have alluded,

More is made to sketch what he considers to be Inglesant's character and

physical constitution. He says:

"There would seem to be some that by a divine sort of fate are virtuous

and good to a great and heroical degree, and fall into the drudgery of

the world rather for the good of others, or by a divine force, than

through their own fault or any necessity of Nature; as Plato says, they

descend hither to declare the being and nature of God, and for the

greater health, purity, and perfection of the lower world."

He goes on to describe the "luciform vehicle" in which such a soul as

this is apt to display itself; and the great need of scrupulous

temperance and purity to keep it undimmed.

Now these passages are, in the places where they occur in Henry More's

works, undoubtedly and in reality autobiographical: they are extracted

word for word from passages where he is obviously referring to himself.

The fact thus remains that, though Inglesant and More are represented as

holding converse together, it is in reality More talking to

himself--himself, that is, differently circumstanced and developed by

other fortunes and influences. The figure of More was not quite romantic

enough for Mr. Shorthouse, and his religious system lacked the vivid

sense of the personal presence of Christ that is so marked a feature in

Inglesant's career; but there is no reasonable doubt that Dr. More

affords in the main outlines of his character and temperament the basis

for that delicately drawn, laborious book which has made such a mark

upon our late literature.

After Lady Conway's death, More was so far identified with her family

and friends, as to write a preface, in the character of Van Helmont, for

her _Remains_. At one time he thought of abandoning his collegiate life

for his rectory of Ingoldsby in Lincolnshire; he intended to settle

there with some friend as curate, and spend his time in quiet parochial

work and study--but the scheme came to nothing. It may be doubted

whether even he would have been proof against the trials of a country

rectory; at Cambridge, indeed, he had quiet as much as he wished, but he

had stimulus too: at Ingoldsby he would have had enforced quiet without

the stimulus.

He was elected into the Royal Society, before its establishment by

charter, in order to add lustre to it; for, though he never aimed at it,

he had acquired long before his death a great reputation by his

writings, which, as Mr. Chishull, the eminent bookseller of the day,

said, ruled all the other booksellers in London.

He was a very laborious writer; his works fill folio volumes, and are

full of curious learning, with a strange streak of humour, descending at

times to a coarseness of expression which would not be tolerated now.

His voice, as was said, was somewhat inward, and not suited to the

pulpit; and so he determined to give the world his thoughts in writing.

The _Divine Dialogues_ are the _Mystery of Godliness_ and the _Mystery

of Iniquity_; the first of these being an exhaustive inquiry, in many

books, into the nature and spirit of heathen religions. It may be said

at once that his method of treating the subject is unjust; he is far too

anxious, in his zeal for the Truth, to attribute to them a licentious or

contemptible origin and obscene or meaningless ceremonies. The

"Mysteries of Eleusis," which, according to Socrates, had much

symbolism of a strangely exalted type, are treated by More as both

superstitious and dissolute--even Apollonius of Tyana, who, whether he

existed actually or not, at least exhibits a high type of the Stoic

ideal, is a solemn puppet in his eyes. When he has, then, to his

satisfaction demonstrated the worthless and debasing character of these

rites--which is surely to shut the eyes to the inextinguishable hunger

for the holy expression of life, in worship, that has never really

deserted the human race--he proceeds to bring the Christian faith upon

the stage, and to show how it satisfies the deepest and highest

instincts of humanity.

But More cannot be said to have been a Christian in the sense that

Thomas-a-Kempis or Francis of Assisi were Christians; he did not hunger

for the personal relation with Christ which is so profoundly essential

to the true conception of the Christian ideal. He was a devout, a

passionate Deist; he realised the in-dwelling of God's spirit in the

heart, and the divine excellence of the Son of Man. But it was as a

pattern, and not as a friend, that he gazed upon Him; the light that he

followed was the uncovenanted radiance. For it is necessary to bear in

mind that More and the Cambridge Platonists taught that the Jewish

knowledge of the mysteries of God had passed through some undiscovered

channel into the hands of Pythagoras and Plato; and that the divinity of

their teaching was directly traceable to their connection with

Revelation. They looked upon Plato and Pythagoras as predestined

vehicles of God's spirit, appointed to prepare the heathen world for the

reception of the true mysteries, though not admitted themselves to full

participation in the same.

Besides these books, which are profound and logical, and composed in a

style which is admirable by comparison to the ordinary writing of the

times. More drilled away into some rather grotesque speculations on the

subject of Apocalyptical interpretation; of this, he says, humorously,

himself, that while he was writing it "his nag was over free, and went

even faster than he desired, but he thought it was the right way"--and

there is something pathetic indeed in the mode in which the passionate

seekers after truth of those times beat their heads against the various

theories of the direct communication of God with man, such as warning

dreams and visions, and the face of the heavens by night. The idea is

beautifully presented in _John Inglesant_, where the hero says to his

brother, who has produced a false horoscope of himself: "I would have

you think no more of this, with which a wicked man has tried to make the

heavens themselves speak falsely.... Father St. Clare taught it me

among other things, and I have seen many strange answers that he has

known himself--but it is shameful that the science should be made a tool

of by designing men."

This is said so naturally, with so simple and melancholy a faith, that

it seems to me to reproduce the feeling of even the more refined and

cultivated men of the time about such things in an infinitely affecting

way.

Besides these there are published letters of Henry More's, prolix for

the general reader, but interesting enough if the man's own personality

appeals to you: some very disappointing hymns and didactic poems, stiff

and unlovely to a strange degree for so deep and graceful a writer; and

many other scattered works, such as the _Enchiridion Ethicum_, which it

is impossible to analyse here.

More had a very facile style: he used to say that his friends had been

always wanting him to go up upon a stall and speak to the people; but

that was not his way: he should not have known what to have done in the

world if he could not have preached at his fingers' ends. He said that

when he sat down to write, though his thoughts were perfectly clear, yet

they were too numerous; and that he had to cut his way through them as

through a wood. However, he would never correct: the thing must go as

he first wrote it; "if he saw any faults in the first draft, he could

correct them, though it was not easy to him--that this correction went

against the grain and seldom seemed to him so savoury as the rest." He

was not inclined to overvalue his work. "Like the ostrich," he said, "I

lay my eggs in the sand, and hope they will prove vital and prolific in

time."

Though he produced very voluminous writings, yet he sometimes manifested

a strong and healthy repugnance to the task of expressing himself: he

had none of the gloomy laboriousness that is never satisfied with its

performance, and yet never takes a lively pleasure in it. When he had

finished one of his more lengthy works, he said pleasantly to a friend,

as he threw down his pen: "Now for three months I will neither think a

wise thought, nor speak a wise word, nor do a wise thing." Once in the

middle of some troublesome work he said, with considerable irritation,

to a friend who was sitting with him, "When I once get my hands out of

the fire, I shall not very suddenly thrust them in afresh." In a letter

to Dr. Worthington, Master of Jesus, he says: "I am infinitely pleased

that I find my obligation of writing books not too fierce in me, and

myself left free to my own more private meditations. I have lived the

servant of the public hitherto: it is a great ease to me to be

manumitted thus and left to the polishing of myself, and licking myself

whole of the wounds I have received in these hot services;" adding, that

as soon as he was free from his present business, his purpose was to

recoil into that dispensation he was in before he wrote or published

anything to the world--in which he says he very sparingly so much as

read any books, but sought a more near union with a certain life and

sense (the sixth sense), "which I infinitely prefer before the dryness

of mere reason or the wantonness of the trimmest imagination."

He had no turn for dry and laborious criticism: he studied things more

than words: of his own skill in dead languages, though it was in reality

very considerable, he spoke jestingly, in that depreciating ironical way

that he always used of himself--that he was like the man that passed by

a garrison with a horseshoe hanging at his belt, when a bullet being

shot at him struck right upon it, upon which he remarked, "that a little

armour was sufficient, if well placed;"--and he often said, in writing

his books, that when he came to criticism and quotation, it was "like

going over ploughed lands."

I subjoin a few extracts from an ode by the "Ingenious and Learned" Mr.

Norris, which is prefixed to Ward's _Life of More_. The composition has

great merit; it is in Cowley's manner, but is the precursor of the art

of Gray. It serves, I think, to emphasize both the opinion which his

contemporaries deliberately held of him, as well as the points in his

life and work which seem most worthy of our attention.

Norris writes:

Truth's outer courts were trod before,

Sacred was her recess: that was reserved for More.

Thou our great catholic professor art,

All science is annexed to thy unerring chair.

Some lesser synods of the wise

The Muses kept in Universities;

But never yet till in thy soul

Had they a council oecumenical.

And again:

Strange restless curiosity!

Adam himself came short of thee:

He tasted of the fruit, thou bear'st away the tree.

And this is a well-conceived epigram:

How calm thy life, how easy, how secure

Thou intellectual epicure.

The conclusion is:

Thy stage of learning ends ere that of life be done;

There's now no work for thy accomplished mind

But to survey thy conquests, and inform mankind.

More was a tall, spare man, well-proportioned and graceful; his face was

noted for its serene and lively air. He was of ruddy complexion, which

grew pale in later life, though always clear and spirited; and "his

eye," says a friend who was often with him, "was hazel," and as vivid as

an eagle's. He had luxurious tastes in dress, and the air of a courtier:

none of the clownishness of the retired scholar was in the least

perceptible in his motions, words, or general bearing.

His portrait represents him in his later years as much such a man as we

should have imagined: he wears his hair, which was light and long, over

his shoulders, and a faint streak of moustache upon his upper lip; the

face is grave but not displeasing; it has the broad arched forehead,

strongly indented, that is characteristic of masculine intellect; very

high and prominent cheek-bones, big firm lips, and a massive chin; the

cheek is healthy and not attenuated; the eyes clear and steady, the

right eyelid being somewhat drooped, thus conveying a humorous look to

the face; he wears the black gown, with girded cassock, and a great silk

scarf--the _amussis dignitatis_--over his shoulders; the gown is tied at

the neck by strings; and the broad white bands give a precise and quiet

air to the whole.

Though temperate and abstemious in life and diet, he was not in the

least what we should call an ascetic: he tried some experiments in diet

in early life, such as vegetarianism, which he practised for a whole

year, but found it did not suit him, and came back to meat; in fact,

though he usually dined in Hall, yet he absented himself on Friday,

when fish was eaten, and dined in his own rooms, eating meat because he

found it more wholesome; and he was not an abstainer--his regular drink

was small beer, of which he uttered an enthusiastic panegyric, saying

that it was a divine drink. He loved the open air; he said he would

always be in it if possible; that he studied best in an arbour without

his hat, so that the air might play on his temples. He was very

sensitive to weather, and found that the autumn brought with it a

melancholy which distressed him.

At the age of sixty-six he wrote his last book, and returned to the

quiet contemplative life which suited him so well, and he says that he

never had enjoyed so long a period of serene light and inward happiness;

but clouds began to gather in his mind--in reality it was the failing

body, but he attributed it to the mind, and was rather unhappy about

himself. He was then attacked by a kind of low fever, and fainted one

evening in the Combination Room after supper: however, as a healthy man

is apt to do, he paid no attention to this, but he found himself growing

weaker. Once pathetically, as he sat talking in his room, he spread out

his hands in the sun; they were thin and delicate with growing weakness.

"My body," he said, "is strangely run out." He then began to suffer from

sleeplessness; for weeks together he could get no rest. "I thought I

should have died laughing," he said to Dr. Ward, "but I find myself like

a fish out of its element, that lies tumbling in the dust of the

street." Then, after a pause: "I am but the remains of an ordinary man."

His mind began to fail him; he could no longer read or think. He said to

Dr. Davies, an old friend, that some one had said to him that this, if

known, might prejudice his writings; "but," he added, "I have read of a

person, an excellent mathematician, who at last came to dote, but none

will say that any of his former demonstrations were any the worse for

that."

At last he got very weary of the weakness and the long strain. "Never

any person," he said, "ever thirsted more after his meat and drink than

I do for a release from the body. Yet," he added, "I deserved greater

afflictions from the hand of God than those I have met with."

He dwelt much on the next world. "I am glad to think when I am gone," he

said, "that I shall still converse with this world in my writings. But

it is a greater satisfaction to me that I am going to those with whom I

shall be as well acquainted in a quarter of an hour as if I had known

them many years."

The day before he died an old friend came to see him. Henry More was

very silent, but at last broke out: "Doctor, I have marvellous things

to tell you." "Sir," said the other, "you are full, I suppose, of Divine

joy." "Full," he said, with tears in his eyes. The other saw he was so

extremely weak that he forebore to question him further. When his nephew

came to see him in the evening, he said that he should soon be gone. "I

am going to play you no tricks," he added; "I am not going to trot and

loll and hang on."

The next morning he understood that he had only a few hours to live. "O

praeclarum illum diem!" he said, quoting from Cicero. They were almost

his last words. He died as the day was dawning, so quietly that the

nurse who sat by him did not know when the passage was. He was laid to

rest in the College Chapel, having just entered upon his seventy-third

year.

The great and singular charm of such a life is its union of mystical

tendencies with such perfect sanity. For nearly half a century Henry

More lived in a light which he did not invent, but found. He cannot be

suspected of fanaticism or weakness; from the day that he found peace in

life to the day that he entered into rest, he lived in the strength of a

magnificent ideal. His great discovery burst upon him like a flash of

light--the nearness and accessibility of God, whom he had been seeking

so far off and at such a transcendent height; his realization of the

truth that the kingdom of God does not dwell in great sublimities, and,

so to speak, upon the mountain tops, but that it is within each one of

us. But this very simplicity he saw was the cause of the unpopularity of

the greatest ideals. Men prefer their own Abana and Pharpar to the

little river rushing in desolate places. A doctrine does not recommend

itself to the busy thinkers of the world unless it be huge and arduous;

and thus he made up his mind to be lonely in the world, to face and

support the isolation of greatness. "At first, indeed," he said, "the

truth appeared so very clear, as well as glorious to me, that I fancied

I should have carried all before me; but a little experience served to

cure me of this vanity. I quickly perceived that I was not likely to be

over-popular."

And yet, by facing and adopting this difficulty, he gained the very

thing on which he had turned his back. He made a success of life. He was

not for ever dying to the world; he lived in it. Though diseased and

shattered moralists may talk of the vanity of human aims and the

worthlessness of this world, life surely has its meaning. We are not

thrust into a pit from which our only duty is to escape. Something of

the greatness and glory of the higher region dwells in the grace and

beauty of the nether world. Shadows they may be of far-off transcendent

realities, but the very shadows of divine things are from their origin

divine. To gain a true standard; to trace the permanent elements; to

fight the darkness at every inch: this is to live life to the

uttermost--not to slink out of it, not to despise it, not to make light

of it. These are the resources of the cynic, the disappointed man, the

involuntary saint; but to live in the world and not be of it--this is

the secret of the light that emanates from but is not confined to

heaven.

Essays(#35860) · 第 25 / 53 题