LI

I have been reading the Memoir of J.H. Shorthouse, and it has been a

great mystery to me. It is an essentially commonplace kind of life that

is there revealed. He was a well-to-do manufacturer--of vitriol, too,

of all the incongruous things. He belonged to a cultivated suburban

circle, that soil where the dullest literary flowers grow and flourish.

He lived in a villa with small grounds; he went off to his business in

the morning, and returned in the afternoon to a high tea. In the

evening he wrote and read aloud. The only thing that made him different

from other men was that he had the fear of epileptic attacks for ever

hanging over him; and further, he was unfitted for society owing to a

very painful and violent stammer. I saw him twice in my life; remote

impressions of people seen for a single evening are often highly

inaccurate, but I will give them for what they are worth. On the first

occasion I saw a small, sturdily built man, with a big, clerical sort

of face with marked features, and, as far as I can recollect, rather

coppery in hue. There was a certain grotesqueness communicated to the

face by large, thin, fly-away whiskers of the kind that used to be

known as "weepers" or "Dundrearies." He had then just dawned upon the

world as a celebrity. I had myself as an under-graduate read and

re-read and revelled in _John Inglesant_, and I was intensely curious

to see him and worship him. But he was not a very worshipful man. He

gave the impression of great courtesy and simplicity; but his stammer

was an obstacle to any sense of ease in his presence. I seem to

recollect that instead of being brought up, as most stammerers are, by

a consonant, it took the form with Shorthouse of repeating the word

"Too--too" over and over again until the barrier was surmounted; and in

order to help himself out, he pulled at his whiskers alternately, with

a motion as though he were milking a cow. Some years after I saw him

again; he was then paler and more worn of aspect. He had discarded his

whiskers, and had grown a pointed beard. He was a distinguished-looking

man now, whereas formerly he had only been an impressive-looking one. I

do not remember that his stammer was nearly so apparent, and he had far

more assurance and dignity, which had come, I suppose, from his having

been welcomed and sought after by all kinds of eminent people, and from

having found that eminent people were very much like any other people,

except that they were more simple and more interesting. I was still

conscious of his great kindness and courtesy, a courtesy distributed

with perfect impartiality.

But the mystery about him is this. The _Life_ reveals, or seems to

reveal, a very commonplace man, cultivated, religious, "decent not to

fail in offices of tenderness" like Telemachus, but for all that

essentially parochial. His letters are heavy, uninteresting, banal,

and reveal little except a very shaky taste in literature. The _Essays_

which are reproduced, which he wrote for Birmingham literary societies,

are of the same quality, serious, ordinary, prosaic, mildly ethical.

Yet behind all this, this pious, conscientious man of business

contrived to develop a style of quite extraordinary fineness, lucid,

beauty-haunted, delicate and profound. _John Inglesant_ is not a

wholly artistic hook, because it is ill-proportioned and the structure

is weak--the middle is not in the centre, and it leaves off, not

because the writer appears to have come to the end, but because it

could not well be longer. There is no balance of episodes. It has just

the sort of faults that a book might be expected to have which was

written at long intervals and not on any very carefully conceived plan.

It looks as if Shorthouse had just taken a pen and a piece of paper and

had begun to write. Yet the phrasing, the cadence, the melody of the

book are exquisite. I do not think he ever reached the same level

again, though his other books are full of beautiful passages, except

perhaps in the little introduction to an edition of George Herbert,

which is a wonderfully attractive piece of writing.

Shorthouse had an extraordinary gift for evoking a certain sort of

ecclesiastical scene, a chapel buried in spring-woods, seen in the

clear and fresh light of the early morning, the fragrant air, with

perhaps a hint of dewy chilliness about it, stealing in and swaying the

flames of the lighted tapers, made ghostlike and dusky by the touch of

dawn; the priest, solemnly vested, moves about with a quiet

deliberateness, and the words of the Eucharist seem to fall on the ear

with a soft and delicate precision, as from the lips of one who is

discharging a task of almost overwhelming sweetness, to which he

consecrates the early purity of the awakening day.

Such was Shorthouse's best and most romantic hour. He had a deep-seated

love of ritual; in spite of his inherited quietism--but for all that he

was a very liberal Churchman, of the school of Kingsley rather than of

the school of Pusey. Ritual was to him a beautiful adjunct; not a

symbolical preoccupation.

The mystery is why this very delicate and unique flower of art should

have sprung up on this particular soil. The most that one hopes for, in

the way of literary interest, from such surroundings, is a muddled

optimism, rather timidly expressed, based on the writings of Robert

Browning and Carlyle. Instead of this, one gets this _précieux_ antique

style, based upon the Bible and John Bunyan, and enriched by a

transparent power of tinging modern English with an ancient and

secluded flavour.

It shows how very little surroundings and influences have to do with

the growth of an artistic instinct, because in the case of Shorthouse

it seems to have been a purely spontaneous product. He followed no one;

he had the advantage of no trained criticism; because it seems that his

only critic was his wife, and though Mrs. Shorthouse appears in these

pages as a very courageous, loyal, and devoted woman, it is clear from

the record that she had no special literary gift.

The rarity of the thing is part of its wonder. It is possible to tell

upon the fingers of one hand, or at all events on the fingers of two

hands, the names of all the nineteenth-century writers who have handled

prose with any marked delicacy. There are several effective

prose-writers, but very few artists. Prose has been employed in England

till of late merely as a straightforward method of enforcing and

expressing ideas, in a purely scientific manner. Literary craftsmen

have turned rather to verse, and here the wonder grows, because one or

two specimens of Shorthouse's verse are given, which reveal an absolute

incapacity for the process, without apparently the smallest instinct

for rhyme, metre, or melody,--the very lowest sort of slipshod amateur

poetry.

After Shorthouse had once tasted the delights of publication and the

pleasures of fame he wrote too much, and fiddled rather tediously upon

a single string. Moreover, he attempted humorous effects, not very

successfully; because one of the interesting points about, _John

Inglesant_ is that there is hardly the slightest touch of humour from

beginning to end, except perhaps in the fantastic mixture of tragedy

and comedy in the carnival scene, presided over by the man who

masquerades as a corpse; and even here the humour is almost entirely of

a _macabre_ type.

Of course one would not assign to Shorthouse a very high place in

English literature, beautiful as his best work is. But a writer may

have an interest which is out of proportion to the value of his

writings. The interest of Shorthouse is the interest which attaches to

the blooming of a curious and exotic flower in a place where its

presence is absolutely unaccountable; he probably will not maintain his

hold upon the minds of a later generation, because there is no coherent

system of thought in his book. Inglesant is a mere courtly mirror, the

prey of his moods and his surroundings, in which beautiful tones of

religious feeling are engagingly reflected. But to all who study the

development of English prose, Shorthouse will have a definite value, as

a spontaneous and lonely outcrop of poetical prose-writing in an alien

soil; an isolated worker foreshowing in his secluded and graceful

talent the rise of a new school in English literature, the appearance

of a plant which may be expected in the future, if not in the immediate

future, to break into leaf and bloom, into colour and fragrance.

The Silent Isle · 第 53 / 61 题