THE FOLK ELEMENT IN AMERICAN MUSIC
Nationalism in music--Sources of American folk-song;
classification of folk-songs--General characteristics of the
negro folk-song--The negro folk-song and its makers--Other
American folk-songs--The negro minstrel tunes; Stephen
Collins Foster, etc.--Patriotic and national songs.
We have been frequently obliged to indicate, in the course of our
'Narrative History of Music,' that certain known facts about musical
beginnings were not first facts--that there were premises upon which
these facts were based--beyond the ken of the historian. Thus we
discovered that some time in the early centuries of our era a type of
chant known as plain-song was systematized by musicians, but we were
unable to reveal the actual source of that music; later we came upon a
more or less artistic expression in the form of troubadour songs, and
again found their actual source shrouded in mystery--or tradition--and
so forth. We were consequently forced to the conclusion that, as
practice precedes theory, something else precedes artistic music, which
is its source and real beginning. That something is the elementary
expression of the race--or folk-song. Art music is rooted in folk-song
as surely as the tree is rooted in the soil.
Folk-song is the musical expression of the racial genius. Art music
is the _individual_ expression of the same genius, plus the personal
character of the artist. However distinctive or individual his
expression, no composer has been able to divorce himself from the
racial genius of which he is a part, any more than a poet of a nation
has been able to rise above the national idiom. 'A creative artist,'
says Mr. Henry F. Gilbert,[60] 'is like a noble tree. However tall the
tree may grow, pointing ever heavenward, it still has its roots in
the soil below and draws its sustenance therefrom. So with the great
creative artist: however elevated and universal his utterances become,
the roots of his being are so deeply embedded in the consciousness of
the race of which he is a part, that the influence and color of this
race spirit will be apparent in his greatest works.'
It follows, then, that a composition, if it is to be great, will be
recognizable not only as the work of a man, but also as the product of
a race. This may sound radical in the abstract, but the fact is easily
demonstrated by concrete examples. To quote from the same source: 'When
we survey with our mind's eye the bulk of German music and contrast
it with the bulk of French music or Italian music we immediately
perceive that there is a fundamental difference between them. Never
mind whether we can define it or not, there the difference is, and I
believe that most of us recognize it without any trouble. At bottom
this difference is because of the difference in race. Inasmuch as the
Italian composer in his music unconsciously expresses the peculiar
temper and character of the people among whom he has been born and of
whom he is a spiritual as well as a physical fragment, so the German
composer expresses, likewise unconsciously, the quite different temper
and character of the people from whom he sprang.... How can any one
fail to recognize these national, or, say, racial characteristics? But
there is a school of critics which maintains that the greatest music
strikes the universal note, and is free from the taint of nationalism.
If this were so we might expect to find the greatest music of Germany,
France, Italy, Russia, Finland, or any other country to be very similar
in its appeal and effect. We should find all this great music to be
lacking in special racial character and to be expressive only of those
characteristics which are common to all the different peoples. If this
were true it would, of course, be possible to conceive of any _great_
piece of music having been written by any person regardless of his
nationality. But can you do it? Can you, for instance, conceive of
Beethoven's symphonies being the normal expression of an Italian? Or
of 'Tristan' having been written by an Englishman? Can you imagine
the 'Pathétique' Symphony of Tschaikowsky having been written by
a Frenchman, or Verdi's 'Otello' composed by a Norwegian? No; the
trail of nationality is over them all.... I believe that the greatest
creative artists have ever been national in the deepest sense of the
word. They have been the mouthpieces of a people, and, while in their
works they unrolled new and hitherto unknown visions of beauty, their
masterpieces have always been an expression and extension of the race
consciousness rather than a contradiction and denial of it.'
If we accept this dictum, it will be quite rational, in treating the
music of any nation, to begin at the bottom--by defining the sources
and general character of its folk-song. We should have no difficulty
in doing this in the case of France, Germany, or, say, Spain, which
are more or less racially simple, but not so when we take a country
like Austria, for instance, which is the home of at least three
different racial stocks. Each of these has a well-developed music of
its own, which has a well-defined racial complexion quite distinct
from that of the others. Now America is precisely in this position,
but in a very much higher degree. We have not three, but thirty or
more different racial stocks, and of these perhaps six or seven are of
sufficient strength and sufficient permanence to have become definitely
associated with the American soil. Only in a limited sense, however,
are these race settlements 'localized,' as they are in Austria, and
therefore capable of retaining in any degree their characteristics and
traditions. America's position is, in fact, unique in that it fuses all
these apparently antagonistic elements, thus obliterating in a large
measure their own racial peculiarities and, by the addition of a new,
a neutralizing element, substituting a new product. That product is
still in the making, and the neutralizing element is so intangible as
to defy definite description. Indefinitely it is the spirit born of the
sense of liberty of action, opportunity and optimistic endeavor which
colors the character of every settler or immigrant, irrespective of his
extraction.
In contemplating the chaotic state of our 'national' music and in
realizing that its ultimate character is in its formative stage, we are
too apt to forget that it too has its folk-song antecedents, however
heterogeneous they may be. We are not here concerned with the ultimate
product, but with its ingredients. If these are partly English, Irish,
Scotch, German, French, and Spanish, they are nevertheless legitimate,
though these foreign ingredients may be dismissed with a mere mention
in so far as they have suffered no peculiar transformation upon
American soil; those that _have_ suffered transformation, like those
that are indigenous, must receive attention because they have become
legitimate material for our composers to draw upon in order to identify
their art with their country. In spite of the peculiar position
of America with regard to artistic individuality, then, we may be
justified in treating the story of American creative musical art in the
usual manner--beginning with folk-song.
I
Since we have drawn the distinction between adapted and indigenous
folk-song, the question naturally arises whether there exists in
America a truly indigenous folk-song at all. It has been agreed that
America, having been colonized by Europeans, possesses no native
culture whatever, except such as the Indians may have had. The Indian,
indeed, has the best claim to the name American, being indigenous,
or at least so early a colonizer as to have constituted virtually a
native race. But being the one element which has not been fused with
the many elements of which the American nation is now composed, he is
to-day in the anomalous position of an indigenous foreigner. For the
American of to-day is predominantly European--of overseas origin--and
the European conquerors have, in this case, not adopted the 'culture'
of the vanquished, because that culture was inferior to their own.
The North American Indian has shown unquestioned evidences of art
instincts--in his folk-lore, his handicrafts, and perhaps also in his
music. But, with respect to the last, his impulses are so circumscribed
by religious formulas and so little affected by a sense of proportion
that they hardly achieve even the mildest form of artistic expression
or design. Moreover, the idiom he employs is so foreign to us, so
exotic in its nature, that either an unconscious or an impulsive use
of it by American composers would be out of the question. What use
has been made of Indian material has been with the conscious purpose
of lending a savage character or local color to the music, as in
the preëminent case of MacDowell's 'Indian Suite.' This is exactly
analogous to the use of Oriental color by such composers as Saint-Saëns
or Delibes. 'Arrangements,' or harmonizations, attempted upon the
basis of our European scale have led to some pleasing results at the
hands of Frederick R. Burton, Arthur Farwell and others, but at a
total sacrifice of the original character of the tunes. What appeal
such arrangements have to our ears depends entirely upon the harmonic
texture or a readjustment of the melody according to European ideas,
not upon its intrinsic value.
'Folk-songs are echoes of the heart-beats of the vast folk and in them
are preserved feelings, beliefs and habits of vast antiquity. Not only
in the words, which have almost monopolized folk-song study so far,
but also in music and perhaps more truthfully in the music than in the
words. Music cannot lie, for the reason that the things which are at
its base, the things without which it could not be, are unconscious,
involitional human products.'[61] It is evident that unless we
understand or feel 'the things which are at its base' we cannot respond
to the utterances that express them. If for no other reason, the songs
of the Indian, because they express the emotions of man at a lower and
totally foreign stage of culture, cannot enter into assimilation, with
our own. They are therefore not significant to Americans as folk-songs
and we have accordingly treated them under the heading of Primitive
Music in Volume I (pp. 1 ff.).
With the Indian rejected as a source of folk-song where are we to
find such sources? Folk-songs, according to a dictionary definition,
are 'marked by certain peculiarities of rhythm, form, and melody,
which are traceable, more or less clearly, to racial (or national)
temperament, modes of life, climatic and political conditions,
geographical environment and language.' The distinction of one
kind of folk-song from another therefore depends upon a difference
in these peculiarities, and we shall have to look for distinctive
characteristics that belong to no other race if we are to find a
truly indigenous folk-song. On the other hand, the _conditions_ under
which folk-song grows (for it does 'grow' while its sophisticated
counterpart is 'built') are essentially the same. The proverbial dictum
that 'sorrow is the mother of song' is true as a general rule. It
is borne out by the fact that a great majority of the folk-songs of
all nations carry a note of melancholy, and a great preponderance of
all such songs is in the minor mode. But this is particularly so in
Northern countries. No doubt the harsher climatic conditions impose a
heavier burden of care. Mr. Krehbiel, who has examined many folk-songs
with regard to the relative proportion of modes, remarks that nearly
all of Russian song shows the minor predominance peculiar to Northern
countries, and he concludes that political conditions have much the
same effect as climatic ones.
Of course, the songs of happiness are many, too, but even these are
in a measure the product of suffering, for man recognizes well-being
very often only by contrast; continuous bliss he is apt to manifest by
indifference. Hence we are not surprised that the strongest outbursts
of joy, often wild and boisterous, are common to the nations whose
dominant note is grief. But whatever the country, folk-song springs
invariably from the poorest classes, and most often from the peasant,
for, exposed to the phenomena of nature as well as to economic stress,
his imagination is constantly stirred by the beauties of the earth, the
mysteries and the tragedy of life.
In looking for analogous conditions in America we may think first
of the pioneer, the early settler, who no doubt had hardships to
endure and privations to suffer. But by peculiar circumstances he was
unfitted for the creation of song. Springing largely from a notoriously
unimaginative tradesman's class, inspired by the stern principles of a
piety that deliberately suppressed impulsive expression as sinful, and
almost constantly engaged in savage warfare, he may hardly be looked
upon as an originator of poetic beauty. Moreover, his English culture
clung to him for generations, while politically he considered himself
an Englishman. The songs he sang, therefore, were the songs of his
fathers, and precious little social opportunity he had for indulging in
their charm. Isolation and lack of communication effectually precluded
a current interchange of ideas.
In a great measure these conditions apply to the subsequent generations
of all European races in America--the pioneers as well as the later
immigrants. Their own traditions, whatever their nationality, are
preserved for a generation or so to the exclusion of new influences;
then the old songs die away and the memory of them becomes obliterated
in the great stream of cosmopolitanism. Only in isolated spots, where
a race, especially strong in tradition or racial peculiarities, or
where a mere aggregation of people, united in a common mode of life,
is sequestered, have these traditions survived or engendered new ones.
Instances of this are the French Canadians, the Creoles of Louisiana,
the Spanish-Americans of Mexico and California, and the mountaineers
of Kentucky and Virginia. These people have a folk-song peculiar to
themselves, which is founded, however, upon a traditional racial idiom,
and may therefore be classed as 'adapted' or 'transformed' folk-song.
For the indigenous American folk-song we shall have to look elsewhere.
The only caste in American history whose condition in any way
resembled that of the peasant class in Europe was the negro slave
of the South. Not only was he subjected to sufferings, hardships,
and oppression, but, injected into a civilization in which he found
himself an outcast, he was forced to create a racial existence for
himself, which, while it adapted elements of the society that ruled
him, nevertheless was bound to be distinctive because of a peculiar
admixture of savage customs and superstitions, the imperfection of his
understanding, and the extraordinary emotional makeup of his character.
The negro in his uncivilized way was endowed with the ingenuousness
of a child, and the susceptibility to impressions that goes with
the untutored mind. He had a childlike, poetic nature, a natural
gift of song, an emotionalism and a sentimentality that responded
unfailingly to all the pangs of an unjust and cruel existence. The
ruthless severing of family ties, the physical pains, the hardships of
labor found a direct expression in his music, the idiom of which was
partly innate and partly acquired. Add to this the intense religious
excitement to which the negro is subject--an emotion which seems
to have translated itself with all its elemental power from savage
idolatry to Christian worship--and you have a combination which could
not but produce a striking result. 'Nowhere save on the plantation
of the South could the emotional life which is essential to the
development of true folk-song be developed, nowhere else was there
the necessary meeting of the spiritual cause and the simple agent and
vehicle.'[62]
The peculiar fact that the one true indigenous class of American
folk-song is the product of an African race is, as we have seen, due
to circumstances alone. It is no reflection upon the capabilities of
the other races for artistic expression. It simply demonstrates the
fact that folk-song grows under certain conditions and no other. A
nation that is prosperous, that is plunged headlong into the feverish
activities of industrial progress, cannot be expected to bring forth
melancholy 'complaints' or gems of contemplative lyricism. But there
come even to such nations moments of national stress that give rise
to unusual outbursts. While these are usually voiced by single
individuals, they reproduce so vividly the spirit of the people that
they often rank with folk-songs in spontaneity and directness. Such are
the patriotic songs, whose creation accompanied every war and every
revolution. Often they are mere adaptations of freshly composed words
to old but stirring tunes, which thus take on a new significance--often
these very tunes are 'captured' from the enemy and annexed to the
country's flag. Such was the case in the War of the Revolution, in the
War of 1812, and again in the Civil War. These songs--not strictly
folk-songs--might better be described as 'songs in the folk manner,'
a distinction indicated in German by the adjective _volkstümlich_ or
_volksmässig_.
Such songs in the folk manner follow in the wake of every considerable
folk-song tradition. They have not failed to do so in America, and it
is significant that the spirit which they reproduce or aim to reproduce
is the spirit of the negro folk-song. The movement, or after-movement,
started with the imitation of negro ditties by white composers in
connection with the so-called negro minstrel troupes which, beginning
about 1845, became a favorite form of amusement in the United States.
Its culmination must be recognized in the work of such men as Stephen
Foster and Henry Clay Work, whose works are part of the permanent stock
of American lyrics. Beyond this the negro song has had an influence
upon the so-called American popular song, a degenerate type which
has appropriated, often in distorted form, some of the character of
plantation song, notably the peculiar form of syncopation known as
'ragtime.'
We have now enumerated all the subdivisions of folk-song in its
broader sense: the native folk-song proper, exemplified by the negro
plantation song; the song in the folk manner, exemplified by the negro
minstrel tunes, the work of Stephen Foster and the patriotic songs,
adapted or original; the adapted folk-song of the French-Canadian,
Spanish-American, the Kentucky mountaineer, etc.; and, finally, the
simon-pure folk-song of foreign birth, perpetuated in America by
immigrants. All of these are vital forces in American composition and
as such must receive more detailed attention.
II
The discussion of the negroes' claim to the title 'American' would
be perhaps out of place at this late date, and particularly in this
place, were it not that a considerable class of American citizens has
denied to them not only social equality but equal consideration and
opportunity as a native citizen of the country. The preponderance of
European blood in the nation hardly justifies this any more than it
would justify the exclusion of the large number of Americans that are
of anciently oriental origin. In contrast with this the name 'American'
is never denied to the Indian, but priority of settlement can hardly
be argued in his favor, for by such reasoning the negro has superior
claims over some of the 'elect' of the white elements among Americans.
Negroes were sold into slavery in Virginia before the landing of
the Pilgrims in 1790. The first census of the United States showed
759,208 negroes, and to-day they constitute nearly 13 per cent. of the
entire population. Their intellectual powers have been amply proved
by the achievements of individual members of the race, in science, in
education, and in the arts. It is hardly necessary to name such men as
Booker T. Washington, Paul Lawrence Dunbar, and Dr. Burghardt DuBois
in support of this. Mr. Krehbiel, however, does well in quoting the
last-named of these in proving the present contention:
'Your country? How came it yours? Before the Pilgrims landed we were
here. Here we have brought three gifts and mingled them with yours--a
gift of story and song, soft stirring melody in an ill-harmonized
and unmelodious land; the gift of sweat and brawn to beat back the
wilderness, conquer the soil and lay the foundations of this vast
economic empire two hundred years earlier than your weak hands could
have done it; the third a gift of the Spirit. Around us the history of
the land has centred for thrice a hundred years; out of the nation's
heart we have called all that was best, to throttle and subdue what was
worst; fire and blood, prayer and sacrifice have billowed over this
people, and they have found peace only in the altars of the God of
Right....'
The negroes' songs are sung in the language of the country--or a
dialect of it; and, while they do not voice the sentiments of the
entire population--no song in a country so heterogeneous could do
that--they are American songs by the same right that the peasant songs
of Russia are Russian or the song of any other class of Americans would
be American.
In order to prove the originality of the negro folk-song it has
been necessary to combat the opinion of so learned a writer as Dr.
Wallaschek,[63] who has contended that these songs are 'unmistakably
"arranged"--not to say ignorantly borrowed--from the national songs
of all nations, from military signals, well-known marches, German
students' songs, etc., unless it is pure accident which has caused me
to light upon traces of so many of them.' This radical statement, while
it has the force of scientific deduction, is erroneous in the premises
upon which these deductions are based. Dr. Wallaschek has relied
too freely upon the testimony of travellers whose musical knowledge
is doubtful and he has evidently confused genuine slave songs with
imitations of them, such as the so-called minstrel tunes written by
whites. Besides, as Mr. Krehbiel very plausibly remarks, 'similarities
exist between the folk-songs of all peoples. Their overlapping is a
necessary consequence of the proximity and intermingling of peoples,
like modifications of language; and there are some characteristics
which all songs except those of the rudest and most primitive kind
must have in common. The prevalence of the diatonic scales and
march-rhythms, for instance, make parallels invariable. If the use of
such scales and rhythms in the folk-songs of the American negroes is
an evidence of plagiarism or imitation, it is to be feared that the
peoples whose music they put under tribute have been equally culpable
with them. Mr. William Francis Allen--with Charles Pickard Ware and
Lucy McKim Garrison the compiler of the most famous collection of negro
songs[64]--while admitting that negro music is partly imitative of the
music of the whites, says that 'in the main it appears to be original
in the best sense of the word, and the more we examine the subject,
the more genuine it appears to be.' Only in a very few songs does Mr.
Allen trace strains of less familiar music which the slaves heard
their masters sing or play. In spite of this, the songs themselves
prove that they are the spontaneous utterances of an entire people.
As in the case of all folk-songs, their first germs were uttered by
individual spokesmen, but these germs were such genuine reflections of
sentiments common to all and were subjected to such modifications in
their travels from lip to lip as to assume the character of a composite
expression of the race. They are indeed 'original and native products.
They contain idioms transplanted hither from Africa, but as songs they
are the product of American institutions, of the social, political, and
geographical environment within which their creators were placed in
America; of the joys, sorrows, and experiences which fell to their lot
in America.'
Having established the 'Americanism' and the originality of the negro
folk-song, and having stated the presence of an African as well as
European element, we may now attempt to point definitely to instances
of both. Generally speaking, the African characteristics consist of
rhythmic and melodic aberration, while the European ingredients find
expression in the harmonic structure and the style of the melodies
as far as they are influenced by that structure. But this statement
is subject to qualifications. While the African, like every other
exotic race, is generally innocent of harmonic science, travellers
have brought evidences of a genuine natural feeling for harmony among
the African tribes. Thus a German officer recounted to John W. D.
Moodie[65] how his playing of an aria from Gluck's _Orfeo_ on the
violin was immediately imitated _with accompaniments_ by the native
Hottentots. Peter Kolbe, writing in 1719, testified to the Hottentots'
playing of their _gom-goms_ in harmony, and Mr. Krehbiel records the
singing of a Dahoman minstrel at the World's Columbian Exposition
(1893) to the accompaniment of a Chinese harp as follows: 'With his
right hand he played over and over again a descending passage of dotted
crotchets and quavers in thirds; with his left hand he syncopated
ingeniously on the highest tuned string.' According to the same writer,
another investigator, Dr. Wangemann, transcribed a hymn by a Kaffir in
which the solos were sung in unison but the refrain in full harmony.
These instances should give some clue to the extraordinary ability of
negroes to 'harmonize,' that is, improvise harmonies to a given melody.
Of course, the strongest musical accomplishment of the African is his
extraordinary command of rhythm. As is the case with most primitive
music, the rhythm of the African music is determined by the native
dances. The drum, which marks the rhythm, is the most important
instrument of the African, and his ability upon it is nothing short
of marvellous. He has developed a 'drum language' which he uses in
signalling in war time and for communication at long distance. 'The
most refined effects of the modern tympanist seem to be put in the
shade by the devices used by African drummers in varying the sound
of their instruments so as to make them convey meanings, not by
conventional formulas but by actual imitation of words.'[66] Their
ability to use cross rhythms and intricate effects of syncopation is
evidently inherited by the American negroes, whose prowess in that
direction may be verified in a thousand dance halls. Syncopation and
the peculiar form of it which Mr. Krehbiel refers to as the 'Scotch
snap' is indeed the outstanding characteristic of all negro music.
The short note on a strong beat immediately followed by a longer one
on a weak beat, and the consequent shifted rhythm popularly known as
'ragtime' is scarcely ever absent in negro folk-music. That it is a
heritage from Africa seems to be conclusively proved by the recording
of such melodies as these:
[Illustration: Music score]
Drum Call from West Africa.
[Illustration: Music score]
Hottentot Melody.
Next to their rhythmic snap, the most radically outlandish
characteristic of the negro songs is their frequent variation from the
diatonic scale. This most often takes the form of a raised (major)
sixth in a minor key (while the seventh is not varied or is omitted
altogether); the raised seventh in the minor scale, or the flattened
seventh in the major. Besides these 'wild notes,' as Mr. Krehbiel calls
them, there are omissions of certain notes of the scale that produce a
decided exotic effect. Thus we have the major scale without the seventh
or without the fourth, and the minor scale without the sixth. The major
scale with both the fourth and the seventh omitted, in other words the
pentatonic scale, familiar in all primitive and exotic music as well
as in certain folk-tunes, notably the Celtic, is also present in negro
song. There are, moreover, examples in the so-called whole-tone scale.
The effect produced by these aberrations constitutes the most beautiful
quality of negro music. We cannot refrain from quoting here an example
or two. The raised sixth in the minor scale is most exquisitely shown
in the famous 'spiritual' 'You May Bury Me in de Eas',' which we quote
in full, without harmonization:[67]
[Illustration: Music score]
You may bur-y me in the East, You may bur-y me in the West; But I'll
hear the trump-et sound In that morn-ing. In that morn-ing, my Lord,
How I long to go, For to hear the trump-et sound, In that morn-ing.
Another instance is seen in the second section of 'Come Tremble-ing
Down,' the first part of which is in C major, turning into A minor with
a striking disregard of harmonic convention, and proceeding as follows:
[Illustration: Music score]
Come trem-ble-ing down, go shout-ing home, Safe in the
sweet arms of
Je-sus, Come Je-sus, 'Twas just a-bout the break of day,
King Je-sus stole my
heart a-way, 'Twas just a-bout the break of day, King
Je-sus stole my heart a-way.
Such examples contain nothing that is imitative. Their disregard for
the natural progressions of diatonic melody leave no doubt that the
negro possessed, to begin with, a wholly independent sense of tonality,
which sense he has in some measure retained or compromised. As an
instance of the minor seventh in the major scale take 'A Great Camp
Meetin'.' We quote only the last three measures of the first section in
order to establish the key:
[Illustration: Music score]
Don't you get a-weary, Dere's a great camp-meet-in' in de
prom-ised land, Gwine to mourn an' neb-ber tire,——— mourn
an' neb-ber tire, mourn an' neb-ber tire;— Dere's a great
camp-meet-in' in de prom-ised land.
And, as a last example of tunes that have little in common with any
other kind of folk-song, a melody worthy of the sophistication of an
ultra-modern composer, let us add 'O'er the Crossing':
[Illustration: Music score]
Bendin' knees a achin', Body rack'd wid pain, I wish I was a child
of God, I'd
git home bime by. Keep prain', I do believe We're a long time
waggin' o' de
crossin'. Keep prayin', I do believe We'll git home
to heaven bime by.
There are many, many more.[68] Melodic imagination of a high order
would be required to produce consciously such melodies as these. There
is in them little that is trivial, nothing that is frivolous. Even the
'rhythmic snap' never sounds cheap in true negro music, as distinct
from worthless imitations and so-called popular music--'coon songs' and
the like. Note the following as a noble example of its use:
[Illustration: Music score]
Nobody know's the trouble I see, Lord, Nobody know's the
trouble I see;
Nobody know's the trouble I see, Lord, Nobody
knows but Jesus.
Brothers, will you pray for me, Brothers, will
you pray for me,
Brothers, will you pray for me, And help me to
drive old Sa-tan a-way?
In summing up the melodic and rhythmic characteristics of negro
tunes we may state the apparently contradictory fact that the great
majority of them are in the major mode, notwithstanding their almost
ever-present note of sadness. Out of 527 songs analyzed by Mr. Krehbiel
416 are in ordinary major, only 62 in ordinary minor, 23 'mixed and
vague,' and 111 pentatonic. Herein the negro folk-song differs from
most other folk-songs. Its Southern habitat would, of course, seem to
predispose it to major, and thus it bears out the argument in favor of
climatic influence. Nevertheless the effect of sadness in the melodies
does not escape us. Often it is produced by the aberrations of which we
have spoken; but more often it is less tangible. In the words of Dr.
DuBois 'these songs are the music of an unhappy people, of the children
of disappointment; and they tell of death and suffering and unvoiced
longing toward a truer world, of misty wanderings and hidden ways.'
Practically all of the songs are in duple and quadruple rhythm, triple
time is extremely rare. The rhythmic propulsion is always strong. The
persistent excitement of rhythm is evidently an African relic and the
sense of it is so strong as to overcome the natural tendencies of the
text. 'The negroes keep exquisite time,' says Mr. Allen, 'and do not
suffer themselves to be daunted by any obstacle in the words. The most
obstinate hymns they will force to do duty with any tune they please
and will dash heroically through a trochaic tune at the head of a
column of iambs with wonderful skill.'
The form of the songs is, of course, determined by the structure of the
verse. They are composed of simple two-and four-bar phrases. Four such
usually make up a stanza, while four more are comprised in the 'chorus'
often placed at the beginning of the song and repeated after every
verse. The stanzas of the older songs commonly contain an alternating
solo and refrain; the second and fourth lines are usually given to the
refrain and the first and third to the verse, the third being often
a repetition of the first. In some cases the refrain occupies three
lines and the verse the remaining one. 'The refrain is repeated with
each stanza,' says Mr. Allen concerning the manner of performance,
'the words of the verse are changed at the pleasure of the leader, or
fugleman, who sings either well-known words, or, if he is gifted that
way invents verses as the song goes on.'[69]
Some difficulty was experienced by those who have transcribed the
music of the negroes in reproducing 'the entire character' of the songs
by the conventional symbols of the art. This is due in part to the
primitive elements in the music, and in part to the peculiar manner of
the performance. The characteristic improvisational style of the negro,
the peculiar quality of the voices, and the slurring of certain values
are all necessary in order to produce the proper effect. Moreover, the
improvised harmony, simple as it was, had become an inherent part of
the music not easily to be reproduced. The following description, taken
from 'Slave Songs in the United States,' may be illuminating in this
connection:
'There is no singing in _parts_, as we understand it, and yet no two
appear to be singing the same thing; the leading singer starts the
words of each verse, often improvising, and the others who "base"
him, as it is called, strike in with the refrain, or even join in the
solo when the words are familiar. When the "base" begins the leader
often stops, leaving the rest of the words to be guessed at, or it may
be they are taken up by one of the other singers. And the "basers"
themselves seem to follow their own whims, beginning when they please
and leaving off when they please, striking an octave above or below (in
case they have pitched the tune too high), or hitting some other note
that "chords," so as to produce the effect of a marvellous complication
and variety and yet with the most perfect time and variety, and yet
rarely with any discord. And what makes it all the harder to unravel
a thread of melody out of this strange network is that, like birds,
they seem not infrequently to strike sounds that cannot be precisely
represented by the gamut and abound in "slides" from one note to
another and turns and cadences not in articulated notes.'
A word should be added here regarding the instruments used by the
negro. The one most closely identified with him is, of course, the
banjo, which, in a primitive form, he is said to have brought from
Africa. The 'banjar' to which Thomas Jefferson refers in his 'Notes on
Virginia' was an instrument of four strings, or perhaps less at first,
whose head was covered with a rattlesnake's skin, and which resembled
closely an instrument used by the Chinese. (_Cf._ Vol. I, p. 54.) It is
thought that the original banjo was a melodic rather than a harmonic
instrument, which is the peculiar office of its modern off-spring, and,
since the negro's music was at first purely melodic, it must have been
accordingly played. The tuning, too, was probably very different from
that of the banjo of to-day.
Besides this, the negro's chief instrument was the drum, as already
indicated. There were two principal sizes, made of a hollowed log (the
smaller one often of bamboo sections) over the end of which sheep
or goat skin was stretched. These drums were played in a horizontal
position, the player sitting on the instrument astride. Then there
were rattles, some like the Indians', some consisting of a jaw-bone
of an animal, across which a piece of metal was 'rasped'; also the
_morimbabrett_, consisting of a small shallow box of thin wood, with
several sections of reed, of graduated lengths, placed across it, the
ends of which were plucked by the player. The familiar Pan's pipes,
made from two joints of brake cane ('quills') and various noise
instruments--'bones,' triangle, tambourine, and whistles--were all made
to do duty. But when the negro had become thoroughly civilized the
violin became his favorite instrument, and the 'technique' he achieved
upon it without any real training has often astonished the white
listener.
III
Attention was not directed to the value of negro songs till the middle
of the nineteenth century. Considerable research resulted finally in
the publication of several collections, of which the 'Slave Songs
of the United States,' already mentioned above, was the first. This
collection of songs represents every phase in the gamut of expression.
The so-called 'sorrow' songs, the oldest surviving negro songs, are
perhaps the most expressive. Some of them have sprung from the memories
of a single act of cruelty, or an event of such tragedy as to create a
really deep impression. Others echo simply the hardships encountered
day by day. There are songs, too, that reflect the sunshine and gaiety
that was not altogether foreign to plantation life, but those inspired
by grief are the most beautiful. Then there are the 'occupational'
songs suggested by the rhythm of labor which form a part of every
kind of folk-song the world over. The value of such songs was fully
recognized by the slaves' masters, for they were unfailing accelerators
of labor, and it is known that the slaves who led the singing in the
field were given special rewards. In consequence of this the negroes
generally came to abhor that class of songs, and it is significant
that very few of the 'corn songs,' 'reel tunes,' 'fiddle songs,' and
'devil songs' have been preserved, while hundreds of the religious
songs--'spirituals,' etc.--are now common property.[70]
A special class of labor songs were the so-called 'railroad songs,'
which originated during the Civil War, when negroes were employed in
building earth works and fortifications. They consisted of a series of
rhythmic, protracted chants, upon words usually originated by a leader.
Railroad tracks were laid to these same strains--hence their name.
Their originality of thought and the fact that they represent the last
spontaneous outburst of the negro under rapidly changing conditions,
lends them a special interest. The railroad itself naturally stimulated
the negro's imagination. He introduced it metaphorically even in his
religious songs: the Christian was a traveller, the Lord was the
conductor and the ministers were the brakemen. At gospel stations the
train stopped for those that were saved, or to supply the engine with
the water of life. All of the negro's power of imagery was here brought
into play.
The love songs of the negro are few and those few lack depth, and
sometimes border on frivolity. An exception is usually made for 'Poor
Rosy,' concerning which one old negress has said that 'it cannot be
sung without a full heart and troubled spirit.'
We have already pointed out the preponderance of religious songs
in the folk-music of the negro. The reason is not hard to find. In
his aboriginal home religious rite, music and dance were closely
associated, as they are in the life of all primitive peoples. The
African's religion was a form of idolatry known as voodooism. Connected
with it were certain chants and rites, relics of which have long
survived.[71] These primitive rites were calculated to excite the
emotions rather than to uplift the spirit and under this excitement
the negro gave voice to the music that was in him. He accepted the
Christian religion as a substitute just as he accepted the English
language as a substitute for his African tongue. He garbled both.
He considered the new religion not in a dogmatic, philosophical, or
ethical sense, but rather as an emotional experience. When under
religious excitement he would wander through the woods in swamps much
like the ancient Bacchantes. 'A race imbued with strong religious
sentiment,' says Mr. M. A. Haskell,[72] 'one rarely finds among them
an adult who has not gone through that emotional experience known as
conversion, after which it is considered vanity and sinfulness to
indulge in song other than of a sacred character.'
His religion became the negro's one relief, comfort, and enjoyment.
His daily life became tinged with his belief; in his very sufferings
he saw the fulfillments of its promises. Nothing but patience for this
life, nothing but triumph in the next--that was the tenor of his lay.
Emancipation he thought of in terms of ultimate salvation rather than
earthly freedom. Thus he sang:
'Children, we shall all be free,
Children, we shall all be free,
Children, we shall all be free,
When the Lord shall appear.'
A religious allegory colored nearly all his songs, a pathetic,
childlike trust in the supernatural spoke through them, and biblical
references, echoes of the 'meetin',' shreds of the minister's teaching,
were strewn indiscriminately through all of them. 'The rolling of
Jordan's waters, the sound of the last trumpet, the vision of Jacob's
ladder, the building of the ark, Daniel in the lion's den, Ezekiel's
wheel in the middle of a wheel, Elijah's chariot of fire, the breaking
up of the Universe, the lurid pictures of the Apocalypse--all asked for
swelling proclamation.' Analogies between the chosen people and their
own in bondage were inevitable--and 'Hallelujahs' seemed as appropriate
in secular songs as in spiritual ones.
Often biblical words were garbled into mere nonsense. Thus 'Jews
crucified him' became 'Jews, screws, defidum,' etc. The personality of
the Prince of Darkness assumed a degree of reality which reminds us of
the characters of mediæval miracle plays. One of the songs personifies
him thus:
'O Satan comes, like a busy ole man,
Hal-ly, O hal-ly, O hal-lelu!
He gets you down at de foot o' de hill,
Hal-ly, O hal-ly, O hal-lelu!'
The so-called spirituals ('sper'chels) hold perhaps the largest place
in the negro's sacred repertory. These plantation songs--'spontaneous
outbursts of intense religious fervor'--had their origin chiefly in
the camp-meetings, the revivals, and other religious exercises. 'They
breathe a childlike faith in a personal Father and glow with the hope
that the children of bondage will ultimately pass out of the wilderness
into the land of freedom.' To them belong such gems as 'You May Bury Me
in the Eas',' the plaintive 'Nobody Knows de Trouble I see,' the tender
'Swing Low, Sweet Chariot,' and many others as rare.
At meetings the spirituals were often accompanied by a most
extraordinary form of religious ceremony, namely the so-called
'shouts,' which flourished particularly in South Carolina and south of
it during antebellum days.[73] The spirituals sung in this connection
were consequently called 'shout songs' or 'running spirituals.' The
shouts were veritable religious orgies, or bacchanalia, and no doubt
represent a relic of an African custom. Julien Tiersot refers to them
as 'dishevelled dances.'[74] A vivid description of a shout is given by
a writer in 'The Nation' of May 30, 1867:
'... The "shout" takes place on Sundays, or on "praise" nights
throughout the week, and either in the praise-house or in some cabin
in which a regular religious meeting has been held. Very likely more
than half the population of a plantation is gathered together. Let
it be the evening, and a light fire burns red before the door of the
house and on the hearth. For sometime one hears, though at a good
distance, a vociferous exhortation or prayer of the presiding elder or
of the brother who has a gift that way and is not "on the back seat"--a
phrase the interpretation of which is "under the censure of the church
authorities for bad behavior"--and at regular intervals one hears the
elder "deaconing" a hymn-book hymn, which is sung two lines at a time
and whose wailing cadences, borne on the night air, are indescribably
melancholy.
'But the benches are pushed back to the wall when the formal meeting
is over, and old and young, men and women, sprucely dressed young
men, grotesquely half-clad field hands--the women generally with gay
handkerchiefs twisted about their heads and with short skirts--boys
with tattered shirts and men's trousers, young girls barefooted, all
stand up in the middle of the floor, and when the "sperichil" is struck
up begin first walking and by and by shuffling around, one after the
other, in a ring. The foot is hardly taken from the floor, and the
progression is mainly due to a jerking, twitching motion which agitates
the entire shouter and soon brings out streams of perspiration.
Sometimes they dance silently, sometimes as they shuffle they sing
the chorus of the spiritual, and sometimes the song itself is sung by
the dancers. But more frequently a band, composed of some of the best
singers and of tired shouters, stand at the side of the room to "base"
the others, singing the body of the song and clapping their hands
together on the knees. Song and dance are alike extremely energetic,
and often, when the shout lasts into the middle of the night, the
monotonous thud, thud of the feet prevents sleep within half a mile of
the praise house.'
Closely related to the shout songs are the funeral songs which
accompanied the 'wakes' and burials of the negroes. They were sung
in a low monotonous croon by those who 'sat up' and are particularly
noted for their irregularity in everything except rhythm. The negroes
are especially inclined to voice their sorrow in nocturnal song, as
their savage ancestors did before them, and likewise they indulged
in funeral dances at night. Mrs. Jeanette Robinson Murphy, writing
in 'The Independent,' speaks of a custom in which hymns are sung at
the deathbed to become messengers to loved ones gone before and which
the departing soul is charged to bear to heaven. 'When a woman dies
some friend or relative will kneel down and sing to the soul as it
takes flight. One of these songs contains endless verses, conveying
remembrances to relatives in glory.' Often these funeral songs convey
deep emotion in a nobly poetic vein. An example recorded by Colonel
Thomas Wentworth Higginson has the following words:
'I know moonlight, I know starlight,
I lay dis body down.
I walk in de moonlight, I walk in de starlight,
I lay dis body down.
I know de graveyard, I know de graveyard,
When I lay dis body down.
I walk in de graveyard, I walk troo de graveyard,
Fo lay dis body down.
I lay in de grave, and stretch out my arm;
I lay dis body down.
I go to de judgment in de evenin' of de day,
When I lay dis body down,
An' my soul an' your soul will meet in de day
When I lay dis body down.'
'Never, it seems to me,' comments Col. Higginson, 'since man first
lived and suffered, was his infinite longing for peace uttered more
plaintively than in that line.' There are many other examples of such
funeral songs preserved; some of them Mr. Krehbiel has reprinted in his
'Afro-American Folksongs' (pp. 100 ff.).
Few of the secular songs have survived. Even these, it seems, were
often made to do service in the religious meeting, on the Wesleyan
principle that it would not do to let the devil have all the good
tunes. Some songs, on the other hand, were used to accompany rowing as
well as 'shouting'--probably because of the similarity of the rhythm
in the two motions. In 'Michael, Row the Boat Ashore,' which was a
real boat-song, not a human Michael but the archangel himself was
meant. Other tunes used for rowing were 'Heav'n Bell a-ring',' 'Jine
'em,' 'Rainfall,' 'No Man,' and 'Can't stay behin'.' Similarly, other
spirituals were used as working songs, for their rhythms were hardly
ever sluggish. As a good specimen of purely secular songs--'the strange
barbaric songs that one hears upon the Western steamboats'--Mr. W. F.
Allen points to the following:
[Illustration: Music score]
I'm gwine to Alabamy, Oh!----
For to see my mammy, Oh!----
She went from ole Virginny,
And I'm her pickaninny,
She lives on the Tombigbee,
I wish I had her wid me.
Now I'm a good big nigger,
I reckon I won't git bigger,
But I'd like to see my mammy,
Who lives in Alabamy.
The negro's natural impulse for dancing seems to have found its outlet
in the 'shout,' as far as the Atlantic seaboard states are concerned at
least, for the Christian sects promptly stamped out the dances which
were connected with primitive superstition. In Louisiana, however, the
negro came in contact with a very different sort of people, the Spanish
and French settlers--southern races of a more sensuous turn than the
Anglo-Saxon. The musical result was the superposition of Spanish and
French melody over negro rhythms--the two ingredients of the Creole
folk-songs, which are to a large extent dance songs.
The warlike and lascivious dances of the African took on a more
civilized form under the influence of Spanish and French culture,
though they are said in some cases to have remained licentious enough.
But the product has been highly influential musically. Thus the
fascinating Habañera, the familiar rhythm of many a Spanish melody,
is, according to Albert Friedenthal,[75] of negro origin. As its
name indicates, Havana was its home and from there it spread to all
Spanish and Portuguese America, the West Indies, Central and South
America. 'Extended and complicated rhythms are known only where the
negroes are to be found,' says our investigator. Mr. Krehbiel quotes a
creole song from Martinique, built upon the Habañera rhythm, entitled
_Tant sirop est doux_, and speaks of Afro-American songs in which
the characteristic rhythm is so persistently used as to suggest that
they were influenced by a subconscious memory of the old dance. Other
dances of negro origin, mentioned by writers on the Antilles, are the
Bamboula, Bouèné, Counjai, Kalinda, Bélé, Bengume, Babouille, Cata,
and Guiouba. The term 'juba' applied to the plucking accompaniments of
negro dance-songs in minstrel shows may be a derivative of the last.
In speaking of the Creole we must emphasize that the word is not
properly applied to any persons of mixed stock, as has been frequently
done. Creole is a word of Spanish etymology and was used to denote the
pure-blooded Spanish or French native of the American colonies. But it
is the negro slaves of these creoles--whom we may call black creoles
(including mulattoes, quadroons, etc.)--that created the charming
songs breathing the spirit of the tepid zone along the great gulf and
the Father of Waters. They, too, are the creators of the _patois_ to
which the songs are set. Concerning the origin of this _patois_ Mr.
Krehbiel gives some interesting details: 'The creole patois, though
never reduced to writing by its users, is still a living language. It
is the medium of communication between black nurses and their charges
in the French families of Louisiana to-day, and half a century ago
it was exclusively spoken by French creoles up to the age of ten or
twelve years. In fact, children had to be weaned from it with bribes or
punishment. It was, besides, the language which the slave spoke to his
master and the master to him. The need which created it was the same as
that which created the corrupt English of the slaves in other parts of
the country.... Thus, then, grew the pretty language, soft in the mouth
of the creole as _bella lingua in bocca toscana_, in which the creole
sang of his love, gave rhythmical impulse to the dance, or scourged
with satire those who fell under his displeasure.'
The Creole songs, according to Lafcadio Hearn, are 'Frenchy in
construction but possess a few African characteristics of method.'
'There could neither have been creole patois nor creole melodies
but for the French and Spanish blooded slaves of Louisiana and the
Antilles. The melancholy, quavering beauty and weirdness of the negro
chant are lightened by the French influence, subdued and deepened by
the Spanish.' Unlike the negro slave of the Virginias and Carolinas,
etc., who poured out all his emotion in gospel hymn and spirituals, the
black creole was especially fond of love-songs--crooning love songs in
the soft, pretty words of his patois--some sad, some light-hearted. One
is 'the tender lament of one who was the evil of his heart's choice the
victim of chagrin in beholding a female rival wearing those vestments
of extra quality that could only be the favors which both women had
courted from the hand of some proud master whence alone such favors
could come.'[76] Another, 'Caroline,' reveals the romance and the
tragedy of the dramatic life of the young creole slaves. We quote it
here, as our one example of creole tunes:
[Illustration: Music score]
Aine, dé, trois, Caroline, ça, ça, yé comme ça, ma chère!
Aine, dé, trois, Caroline, ça, ça, yé comme ça, ma chère!
Papa di non, man-man di oui, C'est li mo oulé, c'est li ma pren. Ya
pas lar-zan pon a-cheté cabanne, C'est li mo oulé, c'est li ma pren.
In general, the love song of the black Creole is more distinctive
than that of other Afro-Americans. A famous example is 'Layotte,'
utilized by Louis Moreau Gottschalk (b. New Orleans, 1829, of French
and English parentage), who achieved international fame both as pianist
and composer. Gottschalk did much to make the charm of Creole melodies
known to the world. The themes of his piano pieces perpetuate many of
these melodies, among them _Avant, grenadier_, which forms the theme
of one of his earliest compositions, _Bananier_. The popularity of
Gottschalk and the general interest which his music aroused in Paris
and elsewhere was one of the sensations of the musical world of that
day.
Another class of lyrics peculiar to the Creoles were the satirical
songs which may be a survival of a primitive practice brought by
their ancestors from America. At carnival times scores of these songs
make their appearance--or reappearance,--new and topical words being
applied to the old tunes, and public as well as personal grudges are
taken out in this manner. Such songs are _Musieu Bainjo_, a mild bit
of pleasantry leveled at a darkey who 'put on airs,' and _Michié
Préval_, of which Mr. Cable says that for generations the man of
municipal politics was fortunate who escaped entirely a lampooning
set to its air. 'Its swinging and incisive rhythm made it the most
effective vehicle for satire which the Creole folk-song has ever
known.' (Krehbiel.) In Martinique these satirical songs, or _pillards_,
are more malicious in intent and often cruel in the relentless public
castigation they inflict upon the objects of their makers' hate.
Other creole songs are of a historical nature, recording events or
episodes of importance to the community. The invasion of Louisiana by
the British in 1814, and the capture of New Orleans by the Union forces
in 1862, for instance, were thus chronicled.
* * * * *
The musical value and the charm of negro songs were little appreciated
until the Jubilee Singers of Fisk University, Tenn., made their
famous tour, which began in October, 1871. George L. White, the
treasurer of the school--one of the institutions for the education of
the blacks that came under the patronage of the American Missionary
Association--desirous of raising funds for its maintenance, was struck
with the artistic possibilities of the little choir of students which
he had organized and trained. After several successful concerts held
in nearby towns he embarked upon a grand tour of the country, with the
object of raising a fund of $20,000. The little company of emancipated
slaves--at no time more than fourteen strong--gave the world so
remarkable a demonstration of the musical qualities of their race that
the matter has hardly been called into question since. In less than
three years, moreover, they brought back to Fisk University nearly
$100,000. Their adventures are told in detail by J. B. T. Marsh, who,
in his 'Story of the Jubilee Singers,' says in part: 'They were turned
away from hotels and driven out of railroad waiting rooms because of
their color. But they had been received with honor by the President of
the United States, they had sung their slave songs before the Queen
of Great Britain, and they had gathered as invited guests about the
breakfast-table of her Prime Minister. Their success was as remarkable
as their mission was unique!
The climax of their tour was the participation in the World's Peace
Jubilee held in Boston in June-July, 1872. There, before an audience
of 40,000 people gathered from all parts of the country, they sang
themselves into the hearts of the nation, in spite of a recurrence of
race prejudice. Their singing of Julia Ward Howe's 'Battle Hymn of the
Republic' to the tune of 'John Brown' was, according to Mr. Marsh, 'as
if inspired.' 'When the grand old chorus "Glory, Hallelujah" followed
with a swelling volume of music from the great orchestra, the thunder
of the bands and the roar of artillery, the scene was indescribable.
Twenty thousand people were on their feet. Ladies waved their
handkerchiefs, men threw their hats in the air and the Coliseum rang
with the cheers and shouts of "the Jubilees, the Jubilees, forever!"'
The fame of the 'Jubilees' soon spread abroad, and, responding to
a demand, they appeared in England, Scotland, and Ireland, with
extraordinary success. Their appeal was direct to the hearts of the
people, and an echo of it is preserved to this day in the adoption of
at least one melody as an English Sunday-school hymn. A second tour
took the colored singers into Holland, Switzerland, and Germany as
well, and everywhere they met with the deepest appreciation. Received
by the sovereigns of both Holland and Germany, they were given the use
of the Dutch cathedrals and the Berlin Domkirche for their concerts.
The Berlin _Musikzeitung_ indulged in a long laudatory article
concerning their music and the artistic finish of their singing, and
Franz Abt, the composer, acknowledged their work in the following
remark: 'We could not even take our German peasant and reach in
generations of culture such results in art, conduct, and character as
appear in these freed slaves.'
Other musicians have from time to time called the world's attention to
the value of negro music. Most prominent among them being Dr. Antonin
Dvořák, who, during his stay in America, voiced his admiration of it
and made use of the material in several of his best known compositions,
notably the 'New World Symphony' and the 'American Quartet.' It will
be appropriate to add in conclusion the well-known passage from Dr.
Dvořák's article in the 'Century Magazine' of February, 1895, which has
caused so much comment:
'A while ago I suggested that inspiration for truly national music
might be derived from the negro melodies or Indian chants. I was led to
take the view partly by the fact that the so-called plantation songs
are indeed the most striking and appealing melodies that have been
found on this side of the water, but largely by observation that this
seems to be recognized, though often unconsciously, by most Americans.
All races have their distinctive national songs which they at once
recognize as their own, even if they have never heard them before. It
is a proper question to ask, what songs, then, belong to the American
and appeal more strikingly to him than any others? What melody will
stop him on the street, if he were in a strange land, and make the home
feeling well up within him, no matter how hardened he might be, or how
wretchedly the tunes were played? Their number, to be sure, seems to
be limited. The most potent, as well as the most beautiful among them,
according to my estimation, are certain of the so-called plantation
melodies and slave songs, all of which are distinguished by unusual and
subtle harmonies, the thing which I have found in no other songs but
those of Scotland and Ireland.'
Many American composers have, since these lines were written, acted
upon the suggestion contained in them. We need but mention George
W. Chadwick, Henry Schoenefeld, E. R. Kroeger, Henry F. Gilbert,
Arthur Farwell, and W. H. Humiston among those who have drawn upon
this fertile treasure of thematic material. It is but the beginning,
however. American music is becoming more and more distinctive. Whether
intentionally or spontaneously, our musical literature is bound to
absorb some of the color of so potent an element of national lore.
IV
A great deal cannot be said at this time about the American folk-song
from other than negro sources. Doubtless there is a wealth of song to
be found in the Spanish-American sections along our borders, in the
recesses of the Blue Ridge mountains, whose communities still live by
the guide of primitive instincts and in defiance of law and order; on
the great prairies of the west, where the cowboy has developed a rude
type of chivalry peculiar to himself and with it an idiom reflecting
the dare-devil and man-defying existence which he leads. But little has
been done to collect this scattered store, to commit it to paper, and
to sift the worthy from the dross.
As regards the cowboy songs, the Southwest Society of the
Archæological Institute of America, under the direction of Charles F.
Lummis, has recently done some pioneer work. One of the songs thus
gathered, 'The Lone Prairie,' was harmonized by Mr. Arthur Farwell and
published in the Wa-wan Press series in 1905. In the arranger's opinion
it is probably the first cowboy song to be printed. As such it acquires
a special interest. It is in the minor mode, has the rhythmic snap
peculiar to negro music, though it is in triple rhythm, and acquires a
certain exotic flavor by the constant use of the minor seventh instead
of the leading tone. Its outstanding ethnic character, if it has any,
is, however, Irish. It is not improbable that the cowboy song should
have acquired a certain tone from the music of the Indian, though a
generous admixture of the Celtic idiom is most certainly to be expected
from the racial character of the caste.
In the same number of the Wa-wan Press there are two examples of
Spanish-Californian folk-songs that are extremely interesting. Their
Spanish character is unmistakable, though perhaps the tone is a little
more plaintive than we are wont to expect from their original Southern
habitat. 'The Hours of Grief' and 'The Black Face' are both set in
the minor, and the 2/4 (quasi 6/8) measure, with the characteristic
dotted rhythm, only accentuates the sombreness of the sentiment.
Syncopation is used sparingly, at the end of a phrase only. The subject
of the latter song--the lament of a dusky youth over his unhappy love
for a white beauty, would bespeak negro origin, too, and the general
character of the piece is certainly reminiscent of the Creole dance
songs with their Habañera rhythm.
The Spanish-American songs of further south, of Central America and
Mexico, hardly come within our scope, though American composers would
be quite justified in drawing upon them for material. A collection
recently made by Miss Eleanor Hague, of the American Folklore Society,
and published with accompaniments by Edward Kilenyi, does not reveal
much beyond the standard of salon music, though in their own home the
characteristic environment of Spanish America and the peculiar manner
of their performance may add greatly to their effect. To quote Miss
Hague:
'To sit in the plaza of some quaint Mexican town on a starry
perfumed evening is to realize the significance of highly colored and
impassioned utterance. One's blood is fired by the rhythmic quality of
the music which floats out from the gaily lighted central pavilion,
and the groups of people are a delight to one's eyes: Indians in white
cotton clothes, gaudy _serapes_ and big hats; groups of young girls
with scarfs over their heads walking about; other groups of young men
in the picturesque _charro_ costume, as well as occasional older people
of dignified mien. On a bench an exquisitely pretty girl sits beside
her mother, with her eyes fixed on space, but quite conscious of the
youth in his best embroidered jacket and sombrero, at the further end
of the bench, who gazes shyly at her and then looks away with rapture
in his eyes. If he has not already begun to "play the bear" under her
window he undoubtedly will soon reach that point in his courtship....
In Mexico the guitar is used everywhere for accompanying and also
for solos. As a rule in playing accompaniments the natives content
themselves with simple harmonies in chord form or as arpeggios; but
they have a deep affection for successions of thirds and never seem to
tire of their honied sweetness.'
The French-Canadian, across the other border of the United States,
also has developed a folk-song peculiar to himself in the course of
his romantic existence. It is so closely allied to French folk-song
that we have preferred to treat it in that connection. There remains
only to be mentioned the folk-song of the Kentucky mountaineer which
has had some attention at the hands of Mrs. Jeannette Robinson Murphy,
already quoted above. The mountaineer, like the cowboy, is made up
of various national strains, and his song in consequence is one of
mixed or indefinite character. The rhythmic element again predominates
and, indeed, practically all his songs have their principal use in
connection with the dance. Fast rhythmic tunes in duple time and in
very simple form are sung as accompaniment to all the so-called 'set
dances,' which form the chief entertainment at evening gatherings in
log cabins. Upon these occasions the fiddler assumes the office of
leader for both song and dance--he calls out the tunes, directs the
'figures' and sings the first verse of the song, while his assistant,
by a peculiar tapping of the strings of the instrument, marks the
rhythm. The songs, or ballads, are often of humorous or bantering
flirtatious character, and in them is perpetuated many a peculiarity of
mountaineer life.
At this point we end our necessarily incomplete review of American
folk-song, a subject which future research will do much to place more
nearly within our reach. We shall now discuss briefly the American song
in the folk manner, which may be considered to have grown out of the
folk-song proper.
V
About the year 1830 an American comedian, W. D. Rice (1808-1860),
popularly known as 'Daddy' Rice, stood in a stable in Louisville, Ky.,
and watched an old, deformed and decrepit negro singing a lively tune
to words something like these:
'Come, listen all you gals an' boys,
I'se jes' from Tuckyhoe;
I'm goin' to sing a little song,
My name's Jim Crow
Weel about and turn about and do jes' so;
Eb'ry time I weel about I jump, Jim Crow'--
and a number of other verses recounting the wondrous adventures of
'Jim Crow.' They are not very exciting, to be sure, and their humor
hardly appeals to our jaded minds to-day. The tune, too, is mediocre
enough. But 'Daddy' Rice saw a great opportunity. He learned the song
and sang it, accompanied by all the funny turns and motions of the
old negro and many more. Soon after he was appearing in a theatre in
Pittsburgh, and, meeting a negro porter on the way, took him to the
theatre, borrowed his clothes, donned them, blackened his face with
cork and added a black wig of matted moss. When he appeared on the
stage and sang 'Jim Crow' the audience roared with laughter; but when
he added topical verses of his own and made his antics still funnier,
the house went wild. To add to the mirth, Cuff, the negro, whose
professional services were in demand, came on to the stage in négligé
and frantically expostulated to reclaim his clothes. Of course, the
audience mistook the interruption for part of the 'show' and the signal
for a climax of hilarity.
That was the birth of 'Negro Minstrelsy'--a type of entertainment which
for the greater part of the century was one of the chief delights of
the American public. How much, or little, of it was 'negro' matters
little--the original impulse, at any rate, came from that source, and
the rich opportunities for humor--of an innocent sort--to be gotten out
of lampooning the race, were eagerly exploited. The 'dandy darky,' the
character created by Rice, soon became a stock article of the common
show and he made his way to every stage. The 'cork fraternity,' as
one of its members called the profession, enlarged rapidly and soon
numbered many distinguished representatives. Joe Jefferson himself made
his début in that capacity at the tender age of four, when he emerged
from a bag on 'Daddy' Rice's shoulders. As for 'Daddy' himself, he
added song after song to his répertoire, until there were enough for
several evenings' entertainment. He toured not only America but England
as well and acquired a considerable fortune.
He was, by the way, not the first to 'blacken his face
professionally.' From Charley White's diary[77] we learn that already
in 1799 'Mr. Graupner' did so, 'Pot Pie Herbert' in 1814, Andrew
Jackson Allen in 1815, etc., etc. In that year, indeed, according
to Mr. Krehbiel, a song description of the battle of Plattsburg was
sung in a drama to words supposedly in negro dialect. But organized
negro minstrelsy did not exist until 1843, when Frank Brown, Billy
Whitlock, Dick Pelham, and Dan D. Emmett appeared in the Chatham Square
Theatre, New York, as the Virginia Minstrels and were 'received with
deafening applause.' They were soon followed by band after band and
hence transferred their labors to England to escape competition. When
they returned there were the 'Kentucky Minstrels,' 'Congo Minstrels,'
'Original Virginia Serenaders,' 'African Serenaders,' and many more,
among them the famous Christy's Minstrels, organized in 1844 or 1845.
The droll humor of the negro, his native wit and ludicrous ways were
a rich field for travesty to draw upon. Exaggerated, burlesqued in
showman fashion, it was the joy of audiences still fond of slap-stick
comedy. But the pathetic side of negro existence, told in sentimental
ballad and stories of plantation life, appealed as well. No less a
person than Thackeray was affected by it. According to the famous
author's own testimony, it 'moistened his spectacles in a most
unexpected manner.'
From a mere accessory to the performance the negro minstrel show,
thanks to the ingenuity of Edwin T. Christy, spread itself to usurp
the entire evening. Christy created the form, the stereotype, as it
were, of the minstrel show. He provided for a first part during which
the performers, from four to twenty in number, seated in a single row
with the 'interlocutor' in the centre and 'bones' and 'tambo' at either
end, engaged in repartee and song in negro dialect alternately. During
the second part or 'olio' there were banjo playing, clog dancing, and
other 'specialties.' It might be remarked here that the negro minstrel
developed a style of instrumentalism all his own, consisting largely of
violin and banjo playing, often in trick fashion, between the knees,
over the head, behind the back, etc. The third part of the minstrel
show degenerated into a musical variety entertainment as far removed
from plantation life as possible.
Increased virtuosity notwithstanding, this breaking away from the negro
traditions of the old minstrelsy brought about decay. Gorgeous show and
glitter superseded negro characterization, just as the coon song took
the place of the negro ditty, while only the blackened faces recalled
the original intent of the entertainment. At present the minstrel show
is dead except in amateur circles of the country town.
But it has served its purpose. It has created a stock of songs
which, though not strictly folk-tunes, are so nearly so as to find a
legitimate place in this chapter. Only indirectly were they influenced
by the negro; their composers were the minstrels themselves--the
minstrels of fifty years ago, who constitute as unique a type as has
existed in America. Indeed, they wrote the greater part of the 'popular
music' of their day. Their entertainment called for a distinct and
peculiar type of songs and the supplying of this demand called into
play much genuine talent, though the showman was sadly deficient in
musical grammar. His first models were probably the negro folk-songs
with their stanza and chorus, the former a simple melody, the latter in
improvised harmony. 'The melodies which were more direct progenitors
of the songs which Christy's minstrels and other minstrel companies
carried all over the land were attributed to the Southern negroes;
songs like "Coal Black Rose," "Zip Coon,"[78] and "Ole Virginny Nebber
Tire" have always been accepted as the creation of the blacks,' says
Mr. Krehbiel, 'though I do not know whether or not they really are.'
Most of the names of minstrel composers are now forgotten; B. R. Hanby,
the author of 'Ole Shady'; Eastburn, who wrote 'The Little Brown Jug';
the writers of 'Gentle Annie' and 'Rosa Lee, or Don't be Foolish, Joe,'
live on by their songs alone. But there are two names, perhaps three,
that stand out above the rest and should be remembered as the names of
composers. One of them only was a minstrel, Dan Emmett, and one of his
inspirations has sufficed to make him immortal.[79] Many other popular
and original tunes flowed from his facile pen--'Old Dan Tucker,' 'Early
in the Morning,' etc.--but none has achieved the fame of 'Dixie.' The
second famous writer of minstrel tunes, Stephen Foster, was a composer
who wrote in the minstrel style simply because it was the prevailing
style and because he found a ready market for that sort of product.
But, regardless of the artistic value of that kind of music in general,
Foster must always be counted among the really great American composers.
Stephen Collins Foster was born in Lawrenceburg, now a part of
Pittsburgh, Pa., on July 4, 1826. By instinct and by inheritance he
was a Southerner, for his father had come from Virginia and his mother
from Maryland. Foster was not a professional musician; he acted as
bookkeeper for his brother, a prosperous merchant of Pittsburgh, and
got his inspiration at camp meetings. He taught himself the flageolet,
studied Mozart and Weber assiduously, and acquired a knowledge of
French and German by his own efforts. He dabbled in composition, turned
out a 'Tioga Waltz' for four flutes (!), and in 1842 wrote a song,
'Open thy Lattice, Love,' to words by someone else. He and five friends
constituted themselves a little singing club and for this he wrote many
songs, including 'Oh, Susanna,' 'Old Uncle Ned,' etc., in the style of
the negro folk-song. Though a German musician of Pittsburgh criticized
his work for him, he certainly had no real musical training. By the
advice of friends he devoted several years to the voice and pianoforte,
'but he was afraid that too much study would impair his originality!
Hence, if his harmonies are bald, his accompaniments empirical, and his
part writing unskilled, we need not wonder, but only regret that so
graceful a flower was not planted in richer soil.'[80]
After submitting 'Oh, Susannah' to a minstrel troupe Foster adopted
that style for most of his songs. There are about one hundred and sixty
in all, a small number of them true gems, perhaps unsurpassed in their
way; many, especially the later ones, mere pot-boilers. 'The Old Folks
at Home,' 'My Old Kentucky Home,' 'Massa's in de Cold, Cold Ground,'
'Old Black Joe,' are practically immortal. They are to America what
Silcher's and Weber's songs are to Germany--they are as simple and
beautiful in their expression as they are sincere in their sentiment.
They were born of the impulse of creation and it is to be remarked that
this applies to the text as well, for Foster wrote nearly all of his
own lyrics.
There are besides a number of sentimental ballads--'Nellie Bly,'
'Nancy Tile,' 'Come where My Love Lies Dreaming,' etc.--perhaps
somewhat more artificial, rather trivial in sentiment and certainly
more German than negro in their substance--and some comic pieces, such
as 'The Camptown Races.' His last work was 'The Beautiful Dream,'
written in 1864.
Foster had a gentle, sweet nature, but lacking in self-discipline and
easily led. He was childlike in his sentiments, possessed of a pathetic
affection for his parents and an almost maniacal love for his mother
throughout his life. He married at the age of twenty-eight, but soon
separated from his wife, became shiftless and addicted to drink. Want
drove him to rapid production--he could write a song in the morning,
sell it at noon and spend the proceeds at night. Finally, he found
himself in New York, penniless, without employment and in 1864 came to
a tragic end in a cheap East Side hotel at the age of thirty-three.
His life, with its grim romance, reminds one of the career of that
other American genius, Edgar Allan Poe. Both were aristocrats of
Southern antecedents and made of the very essence of the American
stock. Both spoke in an idiom remarkably attuned to the best of the
American genius. Foster's melodies partake essentially of the folk
manner--they are _volkstümlich_--they might have been folk-songs,
except that they are individually conceived, that their birth is
legitimate, so to speak. In the hearts of the people they rank as
folk-songs, and, their appeal being permanent, interesting conclusions
might be drawn from them as to the qualities of the American national
character.
The other non-minstrel composer whom we desire to mention as a
writer of popular tunes of the minstrel type is Henry Clay Work (b.
Middletown, Conn., 1832, d. Hartford, Conn., 1882). Work also was not
a trained musician in the modern sense, but a musician of earnest
endeavor and sincere expression. Louis C. Elson says 'he sounded the
most characteristic note of all the American composers of the time,
and his songs give almost every note in the gamut of expression, from
sarcasm to triumph, from gaiety to military glory.'
The emancipation movement inspired Work in the direction of
pseudo-negro songs--'Kingdom Comin'' and 'Babylon is Fallen' being
the first of a series of contributions to the music of the Civil War.
Work's most lasting success is, of course, 'Marching Through Georgia,'
which properly comes under the head of patriotic songs.
VI
A type of folk-song that is as often appropriated as it is indigenous
is the patriotic song. It can be called a folk-song only in the sense
that the people sing it, though in a measure it must reflect the
character of the people--in a measure only, for one nation is very
much like the other when fired by patriotism. Almost invariably,
however, such songs are created at times of national stress, when
feelings run high and poetic outbursts come from unexpected quarters.
Such are the circumstances under which nearly all patriotic songs were
created, 'Yankee Doodle,' 'Hail Columbia,' 'The Star Spangled Banner,'
'John Brown,' and 'Marching Through Georgia' included. Some, like
'Dixie,' became patriotic unintentionally, so to speak, and some, like
'America,' were simply applications of foreign tunes to native words.
The earliest American patriotic song, dating from colonial days,
was a 'Liberty Song,' the words of which were written by Mrs. Mercy
Warren, the wife of Mr. James Warren, of Plymouth. The verses were as
amateurish as the music is angular and bombastic. It was advertised in
the 'Boston Chronicle' in 1768. Both the advertisement and the song are
reproduced in Elson's 'History of American Music' (pp. 140 ff.). The
patriotism reflected in the song is that of the Colonial:
'This bumper I crown for our sovereign's health:
And this for Britannia's glory and wealth.
That wealth and that glory immortal may be
If she is but just and we are but free.'
But after 1770 a new version appeared:
'Come swallow your bumpers, ye Tories and roar,
That the sons of fair freedom are hampered once more,
But know that no cut-throats our spirits can tame,
Nor a host of oppressors shall smother the flame.'
After the storm thus foreboded broke loose, the 'Liberty Song' hardly
sufficed to express people's feelings, but there was nothing to
take its place. To be sure, in William Billings' 'Singing Master's
Assistant' there were printed two war songs that became very popular,
especially the one for which Billings himself composed the words and
set them to his favorite tune, 'Chester':
'Let tyrants shake their iron rod,
And slavery clank her galling chains,
We'll fear them not, we'll trust in God;
New England's God forever reigns,' etc., etc.
'The enthusiasm with which Billings sang and taught these songs
communicated itself to the people, even to those who in the prejudice
of their time had strenuously opposed singing in the churches, but no
one could doubt the composer's sincere patriotism.'[81] Then there were
some stanzas, set to an old Scotch tune and sung by the Pennsylvania
regiments during the Revolution, and a convivial soldiers' song, 'The
Volunteer Boys,' that was composed by Henry Archer, an Englishman,
in 1778, and widely sung. But the one revolutionary tune that has
survived was, strange enough, originally a song of derision aimed at
the American troops by the British. That tune is 'Yankee Doodle.'
'Yankee,' the term still applied to Americans in general by Europeans,
but by Americans to New Englanders in particular, has a doubtful
etymology. There is an Indian word 'yankoos,' which means invincible,
and a Cherokee word, 'eankke,' signifying coward or slave; 'kanokie,'
or silent man, was the name applied to Connecticut settlers by the
natives--according to 'Diedrich Knickerbocker'--and, finally, there is
'yengeese,' an Indian corruption of 'English'--all possible roots of
the word. There are other plausible derivations, including one from
the Norwegian and others from the Scotch. The word 'doodle,' too,
has a Scotch meaning--'dudeln,' to play music. For the origin of the
combination 'Yankee Doodle,' there are, as Mr. Sonneck puts it, 'whole
genealogies of theories.' Probably the words were not used before 1700.
The first known mention of the song so entitled is in a letter of April
26, 1776, in which it is called 'a song composed in derision of New
Englanders, scornfully called Yankees.'
Many theories there are also regarding the origin of the tune. Most
of them, including the well-known story of a British officer having
composed it during the Revolution, are impossible, while the claim of
Dr. Richard Schuchburgh[82] as its composer (at Albany in 1755) is
very doubtful. It is said to have been played by a fife-major of the
Grenadier Guards in 1750 as a march, and a tune at least similar to it
is supposed to have been familiar to the English peasantry previous
to the time of Charles I. Whatever its origin, it was played by the
Americans at Burgoyne's surrender (Saratoga, 1777) and again at the
surrender of Yorktown, at the instance of Lafayette, who probably
intended it as a taunt. It was recognized officially as an American
national song at the signing of the treaty of Ghent (1814), when the
Flemish burghers serenaded the American ambassadors with the tune,
having learned it from Henry Clay's servant!
'America,' sung to the same tune as 'God Save the King'--a tune that
has been variously appropriated by other nations--had its American
origin in the Park Street Church, Boston, the words being written for
a children's celebration held on July 4, 1832, by the Rev. Samuel F.
Smith, a young theological student. Before this, however, the tune
had done service at different times for 'God Save America,' 'God Save
George Washington,' and what not. The origin of the melody, like that
of many other good tunes, is shrouded in mystery. It is generally
attributed to Dr. John Bull (b. 1563), who is supposed to have written
it for a banquet given to James I in 1607. But Mr. Sonneck remarks that
'with such arguments [as Mr. Elson's comparisons] the main theme of the
last movement of Beethoven's Ninth Symphony would become very close to
being inspired by 'Yankee Doodle.'[83] After citing many theories Mr.
Elson remarks that 'there seems, however, scarcely a doubt that Henry
Carey, the composer of "Sally in Our Alley," the unfortunate genius
who commited suicide after a blameless life of eighty years, with a
single half-penny in his pocket [in the year 1740], was the author and
composer of the great anthem.'
Joseph Hopkinson (1770-1842), in a letter of August 24, 1840, throws
light on the origin of 'Hail Columbia,' another popular American
patriotic song. It was, according to him, originally a political song
rather than a national one. The tune is that of the old 'President's
March,' a leading work in the early American répertoire, composed, some
say, by Johannes Roth, a German musician of Philadelphia, popularly
known as 'Old Roth,' in 1689, but more probably by a certain Pheil, to
whom it is attributed in a copy of the year 1793, in the possession of
the Library of Congress.[84] In 1798 Hopkinson wrote new words for it,
which were a glorification of President Adams and Federalism. Sung by
Hopkinson's friend, Gilbert Fox, an actor, at a benefit performance,
it roused great enthusiasm and the audience joined in the chorus. But
the 'Aurora' of April 27,1798, called it 'a most ridiculous bombast and
the vilest adulation of the Anglo-monarchical party.' Since its use as
a Federal song 'Hail Columbia' has undergone a considerable process of
polishing, but its erstwhile popularity has not by any means worn off.
'The Star Spangled Banner,' because of its exclusive use and its
inherent musical strength universally recognized as _the_ 'National
Anthem' of America, is, like its brothers, an imported article. The
tune is that of an old English drinking song, 'To Anacreon in Heaven,'
written by the president of the Anacreontic Society in London about
1770-75. The music is, in all likelihood, by John Stafford Smith
(1750-1836), also a member of the society and author of the _Musica
Antiqua_ (1832). Its American use dates from 1798, when Robert Treat
Paine, whose real name was Thomas Paine, but who objected to being
confused with the 'atheist' Paine, adopted it to words of his own,
under the title of 'Adams and Liberty, the Boston Patriotic Song.'
Other versions, such as 'Jefferson and Liberty,' appeared for various
occasions, one even to celebrate the Russian victory over Napoleon! But
the real version, the one we know to-day, was born during the War of
1812 under conditions which fire the patriot's imagination.
The story is well known. Francis Scott Key, the author of the words,
was sent to the British Fleet in Chesapeake Bay as the envoy of
President Madison to request the release of a non-combatant citizen
held as prisoner. As the bombardment of Fort Henry was to take place
that day, the British commander retained Key till there was no fear of
divulging the British plans. On the morning of Sept 14th, after a night
of bombardment, the anxious envoy looked toward the fort and there saw
the flag of his country still flying proudly over the battlements.
Inspired by the sight, he wrote the first stanza on the back of an old
letter:
'O say, can you see, by the dawn's early light,
What so proudly we hailed at the twilight's last gleaming,
Whose broad stripes and bright stars, through the perilous fight,
O'er the ramparts we watched were so gallantly streaming?
The rockets' red glare, the bombs bursting in air,
Gave proof, through the night, that our flag was still there.
O say, does that star-spangled banner yet wave,
O'er the land of the free and the home of the brave?'
On the return to Baltimore he wrote the remaining stanzas and the
poem appeared in the Baltimore 'American' of September 21, 1814, as a
'broadside.' The stirring measures of the song have never lost their
hold on the American people, and the piece has taken its place among
the great national anthems of the world.
The next national song, in chronological order, is the popular
'Columbia, the Gem of the Ocean' ('The Red, White and Blue'). Its
history is not so romantic. Thomas à Becket, an English actor in 1843,
playing at that time in Philadelphia, wrote both the verses and the
music, after rejecting a set of verses written by David T. Shaw, a
singer then appearing at the 'Museum,' also in Philadelphia. It first
appeared, however, as the work of Shaw--until à Becket convinced the
publisher of his authorship--after which it was so published, with the
inscription 'Sung by D. T. Shaw.' When the author of the song visited
England in 1847 he found the song already 'naturalized' as 'Britannia,
the Pride of the Ocean,' and it has since become a favorite of the
British army and navy.
The national song répertoire received no further notable accessions
till the Civil War, a period terrible and wonderful, that called forth
expressions of exalted feeling on both sides of the struggle, North and
South. 'The Star Spangled Banner' was at first claimed by both sides.
But all attempts to adapt the song by the addition of new verses seem
to have failed. The South found an early substitute in such songs as
'Maryland, My Maryland,' which James Ryder Randall wrote to suit the
melody of the old German folk-tune _O Tannenbaum_. The occasion for
this effusion was the attack on the Sixth Massachusetts Regiment while
marching through Baltimore.
Of all the other Southern war songs only one has survived, and that
was of Northern origin. 'Dixie's Land' was, we have already seen,
originally a 'walk-around' dance, written for Bryant's Minstrels by one
of their number, Dan Emmett. There has been so much discussion of the
circumstances of its birth that it may be well to quote an eye-witness,
so to speak, namely, Charley White, the minstrel, whose diary has
already furnished us with some facts:
'One Saturday night in 1859, when Dan Emmett was a member of Bryant's
Minstrels at Mechanics' Hall, New York, Dan [Bryant] said to Emmett:
"Can't you get us up a walk-around dance? I want something new and
lively for next Monday night." At that date, and for a long time
after, minstrel shows used to finish up the evening performance with a
walk-around dance, in which the whole company would participate. The
demand for this especial material was constant, and Dan Emmett was the
principal composer of all, especially for the Bryant Minstrels. Emmett,
of course, went to work, and, as he had done so much in that line of
composition, he was not long in finding something suitable. At last he
hit upon the first two bars, and any composer can tell you how good a
start that is in the manufacture of a melody. The next day, Sunday,
he had the words commencing "I wish I was in Dixie." This colloquial
expression is not, as most people suppose, a Southern phrase, but first
appeared among the circus men in the North. In early fall, when nipping
frost would overtake the tented wanderers, the boys would think of
the genial warmth of the section they were heading for and the common
expression would be, "Well, I wish I was in Dixie." This gave the title
or catch line; the rest of the song was original. On Monday morning the
song was rehearsed and highly recommended, and at night, as usual, the
house was crowded and many of the auditors went home singing "Dixie."
The song soon became the rage and several other minstrel organizations
... applied to Emmett for copy and privilege of using it.... Not only
was Emmett robbed of the copyright, but the authorship of it was
disputed as well.'
In secession days the song was branded in the North as a Rebel song,
and a Maine editor attacked Emmett as a Secessionist. It next bobbed
up in New Orleans in 1861 as a 'Zouave march' in 'Pocahontas,'
appropriated for the occasion by Carlo Patti, the brother of the prima
donna, who acted as conductor. When the war broke out, the Washington
Artillery had it arranged as a quick-step and soon 'saloons, parlors,
and the streets rang with the Dixie air.' The contagious nature of
the tune easily accounts for its rapid spread and ultimate universal
popularity. It is undoubtedly the most original of all American
national songs.
Turning to the North, the first tune we meet is the famous 'John
Brown's Body,' one of the most stirring marching songs ever written,
a favorite among soldiers the world over. Its origin is humble--a
camp-meeting song among many, sung by the negroes in the South years
before the War, to religious words. It may be, indeed, a negro
folk-song, though its authorship is claimed for William Steffe, a
composer of Sunday-school music. It was started on its patriotic career
by the 'Tigers,' a battalion in the 12th Massachusetts Regiment. The
words 'Say, brothers, will you meet us?' were taken from the lips of
recruits by Captain Hallgreen, the author of the poem. John Brown,
the hero of the song, was not the John Brown of Harper's Ferry, but a
good-natured Scotchman, who was the subject of a current joke among the
men. The words were prophetic, for John Brown of the 'Tigers' lost his
life during a retreat of the Union forces. All attempts of the superior
officers to substitute a name with more dignity and fame miscarried,
and John Brown was made immortal by his fellows. The 'Twelfth' sang the
song from city to city and the swing of it set people wild. Later, when
heard in camp, the tune appealed so strongly to James Freeman Clarke,
that he induced Julia Ward Howe to dignify it with more serious words.
'The Battle Hymn of the Republic' was the result.
A composer whose Civil War songs achieved almost the rank of national
songs is George F. Root (1820-1895). His 'Battle Cry of Freedom,'
'Tramp, Tramp, Tramp, the Boys are Marching,' and 'Just Before the
Battle, Mother' became favorites during the war and have enjoyed an
afterglow of popularity since. Dr. Root was an exponent of the Lowell
Mason system,[85] and was a convention leader who had followed Mason
in his method of diffusing music among the masses. He was a pupil of
George J. Webb and also pursued the study of his art in Paris.
As a final word we must recall Henry Clay Work's 'Marching through
Georgia,' which is perhaps the best of the tunes written expressly as
war songs. It is a stirring melody with all the qualities of a national
anthem, though unfortunately its partisan inspiration and associations
will not allow it to be such. There is nothing to record in the way of
patriotic songs since the stormy days of the Civil War. Peaceful times
have turned composers' attention elsewhere, and progress in the higher
forms of art music has gone on apace. Accordingly, it now becomes our
duty to record the achievements of American musicians in the field of
conscious creative endeavor.
C. S.
FOOTNOTES:
[60] 'Nationalism in Music,' in 'The International,' Dec., 1913.
[61] H. E. Krehbiel, 'Afro-American Folksongs,' 1914.
[62] H. E. Krehbiel, _op. cit._
[63] Richard Wallaschek: 'Primitive Music,' London, 1893.
[64] 'Slave Songs of the United States,' New York, 1867.
[65] 'Ten Years in South Africa.'
[66] H. E. Krehbiel, _op. cit._
[67] In the collection entitled 'Jubilee and Plantation Songs' (Oliver
Ditson, 1887) the melody only is given. Mr. Krehbiel gives two
harmonizations, but it is a question whether they are satisfactory
reproductions of the 'native' spirit of the song. Mr. Henry F. Gilbert
has used it in his 'Negro Rhapsody' with most telling effect.
[68] For an example of a pentatonic melody we refer the reader to
'Nobody Knows de Trouble I've Seen'; for the major seventh in a minor
key (the use of the augmented second) to the 'Baptizing Hymn' ('Freely
Go') and 'Father Abraham' ('Tell It'). This peculiar oriental effect
may be, as Mr. Krehbiel thinks, due to a feeling that was natural to
the Moors, the Mohammedan negroes who made up a small part of the
American colored stock. A specimen of a song in the whole-tone scale
is 'O Rock Me, Julie,' in which the refrain is each time a fifth lower
than the verse.
[69] 'Slave Songs in the United States.'
[70] James Augustus Grant in 'A Walk Across Africa' says that his
people when cleaning rice were always followed by singers who
accompanied the workers with clapping of hands and stamping of feet.
'Whenever companies of negroes were working together in the cotton
fields and tobacco factories, on the levees and steamboats or sugar
plantations and chiefly in the fervor of religious gatherings, these
melodies sprang into life.' (Booker T. Washington, in preface to
Coleridge-Taylor's 'Twenty-four Negro Melodies.')
[71] Remnants of voodooism have survived in Louisiana to our day.
The language of the creole negro is a French _patois_. In his songs
this _patois_ is sometimes intermingled with strange words of African
origin. Some still have an African refrain, though the negroes no
longer understand its meaning. Lafcadio Hearn, upon asking the meaning
of the words of one of these songs of a negro woman in Louisiana,
received the answer: _Mais c'est Voudoo, ça; je n'en sais rien!_ With
the help of philological references Hearn actually traced the words to
Africa and made sense out of them in connection with their context.
[72] 'Century Magazine,' Aug., 1899.
[73] Mr. Allen says that the shout is not found in North Carolina and
Virginia, though Mr. Krehbiel knows of an example from Kentucky. Mr.
Allen says, however, that the term 'shouting' is used in Virginia in
reference to a peculiar motion of the body wholly unlike the Carolina
shouting.
[74] _La Musique ches les peuples indigènes de l'Amérique du Nord._
[75] _Musik, Tanz und Dichtung bei den Kreolen Amerikas._
[76] George W. Cable in 'Century Magazine.'
[77] White had a long and successful career as a minstrel and manager.
Extracts from his diary were printed in the New York _Sun_, April 20,
1902, shortly after his death.
[78] 'Zip Coon,' or 'Turkey in the Straw,' one of the liveliest of
American popular tunes, has also been attributed to George Washington
Dixon, who appeared on the stage as early as 1830 and sang to the
accompaniment of a banjo.
[79] 'Dixie' was a minstrel 'walk-around,' but it has become a
patriotic song and we shall speak of it as such later on.
[80] César Saerchinger: 'Stephen Foster and the American Folksong'
(_The International_, Feb., 1914).
[81] 'American History and Encyclopedia of Music.'
[82] Dr. Schuchburgh was a surgeon in the British army. He probably
wrote the satirical words of the song and adapted them to a familiar
tune.
[83] Oscar G. Sonneck: 'Reports on "Hail Columbia," "Yankee Doodle,"
etc.,' Library of Congress.
[84] _Cf._ Sonneck, _op. cit._, pp. 68-69.
[85] _Cf._ Chapter X, pp. 240 ff.