An Essay read at a Meeting of the Royal Irish Academy, by George Petrie,
R.H.A., M.R.I.A.
Having a few months since succeeded in deciphering an ancient and
somewhat difficult inscription on the seal of a distinguished Irish
chief, which the Dean of St Patrick’s had but just previously added to
his magnificent collection of our national antiquities, it occurred
to me that a notice of this seal, and of a few others of the same
class, preserved in that collection and in my own, might be somewhat
interesting to the Academy, and at the same time prove useful in showing
the importance of forming collections of this kind. In an assembly so
enlightened as that which I have the honour to address, it would be
impertinent to offer any remarks on the value of ancient seals, not
only as evidences of the truth of history, both local and national, but
also as illustrations of the state and progress of the arts in times
past. As has been justly remarked, it is from the great seals of England
that we have been supplied with the surest criteria for estimating the
progressive advancements made in architectural taste, and the various
successive phases which it has from time to time exhibited in the
country; and if all other historical evidences were lost, this alone
would perhaps be sufficient to compensate for the want. The importance
of this branch of archæology has indeed been felt and acknowledged in
every other country of Europe, in proportion to the progress which it
has made in civilization and refinement; and we should perhaps feel some
mortification at being necessitated to confess that in Ireland alone
it has hitherto received scarcely any attention. I shall not say that
this neglect on the part of our antiquaries has arisen from a distaste
for investigations which, as they require merely a little learning and
common sense, allow no indulgence for the mind to soar into the dim
and distant upper regions of romance and fanciful conjecture, where
such qualities would be found but weighty and earthly incumbrances. A
sufficient reason may be found in the fact, that until very recently
there were no collections of antiquities of this class in existence to
which investigators could refer; and hence, if the Irish antiquary had
been only a few years back asked the question whether the Irish ever had
the use of signets commonly among them, he would have been constrained
to confess his inability to give an answer. Such a question, however,
can be replied to now in a more satisfactory manner. It is ascertained
that not only the Irish kings and petty princes, from the period of the
Anglo-Norman conquest, used signets, but also that they were common among
persons of inferior rank. It can be also shown that such signets closely
resembled in style and device those of the Anglo-Normans of similar
ranks. Still, however, from the imperfection consequent on the recent
formation of our collections of antiquities, the era at which seals
began to be used in Ireland remains undecided; for although we have no
seals of an earlier age than the thirteenth century, it would be as yet
premature to conclude that none such ever existed. Till a recent period
it was the opinion of the English antiquaries generally that the use of
signets was unknown to the Saxons, and was introduced into England by the
Normans; and this opinion was grounded on the fact that no Saxon seals
had ever been discovered. But of late years there have been found seals,
unquestionably of the Saxon times; and no doubt can now be reasonably
entertained of their general use among that people; and hence, although
no seals of cotemporaneous with the Saxon times have as yet been met with
in Ireland, the similarity that prevailed between the two countries in
customs, and in knowledge of the arts, would very strongly warrant the
conclusion that the use of signets could not have been unknown or perhaps
uncommon in Ireland.
To these prefatory remarks I have only to add, that though the use of
signets was common not only among the Greeks and Romans, but also among
the earlier civilized nations of the East, we have no evidence that such
a use had ever been introduced into Ireland by its original colonists.
With these few general introductory observations I shall now proceed to
exhibit to the Academy the seals which it appeared to me desirable to
bring under their notice.
[Illustration]
The first, unfortunately, I can only exhibit in a drawing, as the
original is not now known to exist. It is the seal of Felim O’Conor,
who was allowed by the English government to bear the hereditary title
of king of Connaught in the thirteenth century, and the legend is
_S. Fedlimid Regis Conactie_. The impression of this seal has been
published in Ware’s Antiquities, where it is adduced as an evidence
that some of the Irish chiefs retained the title of king subsequently
to the Anglo-Norman conquest. The following is the passage in which the
statement occurs:--
“Thus far the kings of Ireland, who lived before the arrival of the
English under King Henry II, but even after that period, some, though
subjects, enjoyed the regal title, and were styled kings even by the
kings of England. For Hoveden cites the following passage under the
year 1175. _Hic est Finis et Concordia_, &c. ‘This is the final end and
concord, which was made at Windsor on the octaves of St Michael in the
year of grace 1175, between our Lord Henry king of England, son of the
Empress Maude, and Roderick king of Connaught, by Catholicus, Archbishop
of Tuam, and Cantord, Abbot of St Brendan, and Master Laurence,
chancellor of the king of Conaught, viz., that the king of England grants
to the said Roderick, his liege man, king of Conaught, that as long as he
shall faithfully serve him, he shall be king under him, ready to do him
service as liege man, &c.’ The letters patent of king Henry II, by which
he committed the management of his Irish affairs to William Fitz-Adelm,
his sewer, shew us the rank in which these nominal kings were at that
time placed. They begin thus: ‘_Henricus_, &c. Henry by the grace of God,
king of England, lord of Ireland, duke of Normandy and Aquitain, and
earl of Anjou, to the archbishops, bishops, KINGS, earls, barons, and
to all his faithful subjects of Ireland, greeting.’ It appears also out
of the close roll An. 6th of king John in the Tower of London, that the
successor of Roderick was in like manner called king of Conaught. So in
the close roll of the 5th of Henry III, some of the king’s letters patent
were directed, among others to K. king of Conaught, and to O. king of
Kinel-ean; and in the following year the same king granted to the king of
Tosmond the land of Tosmond. For thus it is in the charter roll of the
6th of Henry III, Membr. 2, ‘_Rex_, &c. The king to the king of Tosmond,
greeting. We grant unto you the land of Tosmond, (_i. e._ Thumond) which
you formerly held at the farm of 130 marks, to be held of us until
we come of age.’ Concerning the suit exhibited at London by Fedlimid
O’Conor before K. Henry III. and his court, see Matthew Paris under the
year 1140, where that writer calls him ‘_Petty King of that part of_
Ireland, _which is called_ Cunnoch, _i. e._ Conaught;’ and that Fedlimid
himself took upon him the name of king of Connaught, appears from his
seal, the impression of which is exhibited to the reader, plate 1, No.
3.--[It appears by the Lord Stafford’s letters (_c._) that the seal here
mentioned was presented to King Charles I. in the year 1636.]”
From the letter here alluded to, which was addressed to Lord Stafford by
Secretary Cooke in 1636, it appears that this seal was presented by Sir
Beverley Newcomen to the king in person, by whom, as the letter states,
the seal was much esteemed, and well accepted. As this seal is not known
to exist at present, it may be supposed that it was lost in the civil
wars which followed so soon afterwards.
As the life of Felim O’Conor constitutes a portion of the general history
of Ireland, it is unnecessary for me to advert more in detail to it, than
to mention that he was elected to the throne of Connaught, by the English
of that province in 1230, was deposed by them in 1232, was restored
again soon afterwards, died in 1265, and was interred in the abbey of
Roscommon, where a magnificent tomb was raised over his remains, which
is still to be seen. His death is thus recorded in the Annals of the
Four Masters:--“1265. Felim, the son of Charles the red-handed O’Conor,
defender and supporter of his own province and of his friends on every
side; expeller and plunderer of his enemies; a man full of hospitality,
valour, and renown; patron of the orders of the clergy and of men of
science; worthy heir to the throne of Ireland for his nobility, justice
and valour, wisdom, personal shape, and love of truth; died after
extreme unction and penance, in the monastery of the Dominican Friars at
Roscommon, which he himself had granted to God and that order.”
It will be observed that the style and device of this seal are very
similar to those of the Norman and Anglo-Norman seals of the same age;
and it can scarcely admit of doubt that its type was derived from that
source. As to its general form, we have no description left; but a nearly
cotemporary seal of a king of Desmond, which I have now the honour to
exhibit will probably enable the Academy to form an accurate idea of it.
[Illustration]
This seal, which is from my own cabinet, is, as the inscription shows,
the seal of Donald Og, the son of Donald Roe Mac Carthy, who, as appears
from the notices in the Irish and English authorities, became king or
lord of Desmond by the murder of his father, Donald Roe, in 1306, or, as
some accounts state, in 1302, and was himself killed in 1309. The legend
runs thus:--_S. Dovenaldi: Og: Fili: D: Roth MaCarthy_. The name of this
prince appears in the pedigree of the Mac Carthy family as fifteenth
in ascent from the last Earl of Clancarty and the thirtieth in descent
from their great ancestor Oilioll Olum. It will be seen that its device
is very similar to that of the king of Connaught, but the form of the
letters in the inscription indicates a somewhat later age. This seal was
found about twenty years ago in the county of Cork, and was purchased
originally by a watch-maker in that city.
[Illustration]
The next seal that I have the honour to exhibit is from the collection
of the Dean of St Patrick’s, and is that to which I made allusion at the
commencement of this paper. It was discovered by that zealous collector
among some old silver in a jeweller’s shop. In its general features
it is similar to the seals already noticed, but the character of the
letters in the legend indicate a still later age; and this circumstance,
unimportant as it may appear, is of consequence, as it enables us with
certainty to determine its owner, which would otherwise have been with
difficulty ascertained, as there were two chiefs of the name in the
legend in the family to which it belongs. The inscription on this seal
reads thus:--_Si. Mac Con, ducis de Ui Cassin_. The territory called
Hy-Caissin comprehended a considerable tract of the ancient Thomond in
the county of Clare, of which the Macnamaras were hereditary lords; and
the Mac Con whose name appears on this seal is found in all the pedigrees
of that illustrious family, as the 28th in descent from Oilioll Olum,
the common ancestor of the Mac Carthys, O’Briens, and other princely
families of Munster. According to the Annals of Innisfallen, which are
the best authority for the history of Munster, the first Mac Con Mara was
elected to be chief head of the tribe of O’Coilean in 1313: and again, at
the year 1315, it is stated that Macnamara, and Mahon the son of Cumea,
went to the tower of De Clare to compel him to enter into an agreement,
which De Clare acceded to, to give Mac Con and his heirs the canthred of
Ua Caissin, the charters whereof had been given to De Clare. The second
Mac Con, to whom as I conceive this seal should be assigned, and who was
grandson to the former, became chief of Hy-Caissin about the year 1340,
and died about ten years afterwards.
[The remainder of this article shall be given in an early number.]