EDMUND R. ANGELL.

A word in explanation may be necessary to those who are not familiar with

water analysis.

Water that contains such a large amount of solids is very suspicious. It

will be seen that the sample contained twelve grains of chlorine to the

gallon, which would alone at once condemn it. The only source from which

chlorine is derived in the waters of this state, except possibly a trace,

must be from the sewage or waste from the household, where common salt is

used. A well that contains over one grain to the gallon is to be looked

upon with suspicion. The same is true of a water that contains over 0.01

part of ammonia or “albuminoid ammonia.”

Then, again, the bacteria and infusoria, to the extent present, indicate

its pollution.

Of the history of this well and the family using its water Dr. Currier

renders the following report, which is a terrible commentary upon the

dangers of filth in drinking-water. Since the report was made, Dr. C.

states that there was a case of typhoid upon these premises during the

early part of the winter, which he did not know of at the time his

report was written.

Water pollution—Wells · 第 8 / 12 题