CHAPTER IX.

WATER POACHERS.

If trout streams and salmon rivers are ever more interesting than when

the "March-brown" and the May-fly are on, surely it must be when the

fish are heading up stream for the spawning grounds. Then the salmon

leave the teeming seas and the trout their rich river reaches for the

tributary streams. At this time the fish glide through the deep water

with as much eagerness as they rushed down the same river as silvery

samlets or tiny trout. Maybe they stay for a short time at some

well-remembered pool, but the first frosts remind them that they must

seek the upper waters. A brown spate rolling down is a potent reminder,

and they know that by its aid the rocks and weirs will be more easily

passed. If the accustomed waterways are of solid foam the fish get up

easily, but the soft spray gives them little hold. Let us watch them

try to surmount the first obstacle; and here, by the White Water rocks

it is a silvery sight to see the salmon "run." There is a deafening

roar from the waterfall, and the almost impalpable spray constitutes a

constant maze of translucent vapour. Ever and anon a big fish throws

its steel-blue form many feet above the water, endeavouring to clear

the obstacle. Many times it is beaten back, but at last it gains a

ledge, and by a concentrated effort manages to throw itself into the

still deep water beyond. Instead of leaping, the female fish try to run

through the foam and on from stone to stone until a last leap takes

them over. Where no passes exist many fish are picked up dead, the

majority of these prove to be males, and this preponderance is also

noticeable upon the breeding grounds. The spawning redds are selected

where the tributaries are clear and pure--where there is bright gravel

and an entire absence of sediment. Here the fish settle down to their

domestic duties, and their movements seem to be regulated by a dulling

stupor. This facilitates observation, but it also assists the poacher

in his silent trade. Once settled, the female fish scoops out a hollow

in the sheltering gravel, and is closely attended by her lord. Whilst

spawning is proceeding, observe with what care he attends her, and in

what evolutions he indulges. He rises and falls, now passing over, now

under her, and settling first upon this side, then upon that. Observe,

too, how he drives off the young unfertile fish which are ever lying in

wait to devour the spawn. The eggs are deposited at intervals in the

sand, and when the milt has been fertilised the whole is covered over,

there to remain until spring. The salmon deposits nearly a thousand

eggs for every pound of its live weight, and from the quantity of spawn

in some salmon rivers it would seem that nothing which man could

do--save pollution--would have any appreciable influence upon the

increase of the species. The fecundity of trout is even greater than

that of salmon, while a tiny smelt of only two ounces contains upwards

of thirty-five thousand eggs, and even these are as nothing compared

with the rate of increase of several marine and "coarse" fish. An

individual cod has yielded more than six million; a turbot fourteen

million; and a twenty-eight pound conger eel fifteen million eggs.

The eggs of salmon are nearly as large as the seed of a garden pea, and

those of good trout only slightly less. The ova is of a delicate salmon

colour and the cell-walls are semi-transparent--so much so that the

embryo shows plainly through. Although delicate in appearance they are

elastic and capable of sustaining great pressure, and an egg thrown

upon a flat surface will rebound like an india-rubber ball. The economy

of the extreme prolificness of the sporting fishes of Britain can best

be understood when we come to consider the host of enemies which beset

both salmon and trout in the very first stages of their existence.

Nature is prolific in her waste, and a whole army of nature's poachers

have to be satisfied. So true is this that the yearly yield of the

largest salmon-producing river in the kingdom is computed at about the

produce of _one female fish_ of from fifteen pounds to twenty

pounds in weight; the produce of all the rest being lost or wasted.

Sometimes a single ill-timed spate will destroy millions of eggs by

tearing them from the gravel and laying them bare to a whole host of

enemies.[2] These enemies are in the air, on the land, in the water,

and nothing short of an enumeration of them can convey any idea of

their numbers and wholesale methods of destruction. In addition to the

yearling salmon and trout which for ever haunt the skirts of the

spawning grounds, there are always a number of mature unfertile fish

which for a part of the year live entirely upon the spawn. An instance

of this is recorded by a river watcher on the Thames, who states that

while procuring trout ova in a stream at High Wycombe, he observed a

pair of trout spawning on a shallow ford, and another just below them

devouring the ova as fast as it was deposited by the spawner. The

keeper netted the thief, and in its stomach was found upwards of two

ounces of solid ova, or about three hundred eggs. Eels particularly

root up the gravel beds, and the small river lamprey has also been seen

busily engaged in the like pursuit. These have a method in going about

their depredations that is quite interesting. Small parties of them

work together, and by means of their suckers they remove the stones,

immediately boring down after the hidden spawn. If a stone be too large

for one to lift another will come to its aid, even four or five having

been seen to unite their forces. It is a good-sized stone which can

resist their efforts, and the mischief they do is considerable. Even

water beetles and their larvæ must, on account of their numbers and

voracity, come within the reckoning, and among the most destructive of

these are water-shrimps and the larvæ of the dragon-fly. Have we not

been told that while the loved May-fly is "on," all hours, meats,

decencies, and respectabilities must yield to his caprice, so that the

pink-spotted trout, rushing from every hover, may be lifted gently from

its native stream to gasp away its life among the lush summer grass?

But if the gauzy-winged fly is one of the loved likes of the trout, the

former has its day, for none of the larvæ of water beetles is so

destructive to spawn and fry as this. Pike and coarse fish are equally

partial to the same repast, and even salmon and trout devour the young

of their own kind. Waterfowl are among the trout-stream poachers, and

the swan is a perfect gourmand. My swan and her crew (five cygnets)

would dispose of two million five hundred thousand eggs in that time.

Some of the best trout streams in the country have been depopulated of

fish by these birds, and the Thames as a fishing river is now greatly

suffering from the number of swans allowed upon it.[3] Both wild and

domestic ducks are destructive to spawn and almost live on the "redds"

during the breeding season. We have more than once shot moorhens in

autumn with spawn dripping from their bills, and the birds themselves

gorged with it. The coot has been charged with the same crime, though

as yet guilt has only been brought home to it with regard to coarse

fish; and to the silvery bleak it is said to be particularly partial.

The grebe or dabchick must be looked upon as an arrant little poacher

not only of eggs and fry but of fish in every stage of growth. It is

said that a pair of dabchicks will do more harm on a river than a pair

of otters, which, however, is perhaps not so terrible as it sounds.

Fourteen little grebes fishing about a mile of trout stream, as we have

known, is overstepping the balance of nature, and would certainly

injure the river; and Mr. Bartlett has stated that a pair of these

birds which he kept in confinement cost the Zoological Society a

considerable sum in providing small fish for them. Frank Buckland had a

grebe sent to him which had been choked by a bullhead, and the same

fate has not unfrequently befallen kingfishers and other aquatic

feeders. The vegetarian water-voles may be written down innocent with

regard to spawn, or at the worst "not proven." Our British voles are

miniature beavers that haunt the water sides and lead a fairy-like

existence among the osier-beds and lily-pads. They know but little of

winter, and therefore of the spawning season, and their delectable

lives are lived on through ever-recurring summers. Until lately

naturalists knew but little of the life-history of the voles, and the

country folk called them "water-rats" and "field-mice," and knew little

beyond except that they tunnelled their meadow-banks. As the little

creatures pass from one bank to another they swim fearlessly towards

the observer, and when within a few yards of the side suddenly

disappear and enter their holes from beneath. Much abuse has been

heaped upon the vole for its alleged propensity for destroying ova, but

as yet nothing has been proved against it. We have watched scores of

these little creatures feeding on the succulent leaves of water-plants,

but have never detected them searching the "redds" or taking trout fry.

It has been asserted that voles feed upon flesh when opportunity

offers, but perhaps we cannot better vindicate their general character

in this respect than by relating an incident which has occurred

annually for some years past. In a quiet pool known to us, a couple of

moorhens have annually hatched and reared one or more broods under the

shadow of an old thorn-tree, the nest being interwoven with one of the

lower boughs which floats on the surface of the water. Under the roots

a pair of voles have annually brought forth several young families; and

yet perfect amity seems to exist between the birds and the rodents. We

have seen the eggs lying for hours uncovered and unprotected, and at

other times the young birds, not more than a few hours old, swimming

about in the water when the voles were constantly feeding, crossing and

recrossing from bank to bank. If voles were addicted to killing birds

the downy young of the moorhen would have afforded tender morsels, and

have been easily obtained in a small confined pool ere they were able

to take wing.

[2] "Sometimes while stealing along in a quiet deep channel

but a few yards wide, worn through the rock, or between it

and the green bank opposite, the spectator would marvel at

the broad expanse of shingle or barren sand. Little would he

wonder if, after a week's rain, he sought the same spot, when

Tweed was coming down in his might, and every tributary

stream, transformed for the nonce into a river, swelled the

mighty flood. Then timber trees, sawn wood, dead animals,

farming implements, even haystacks would come floating down,

and the very channel of the river would be diverted,

sometimes never to return to its ancient course. Sad was the

havoc occasioned among the embryo spawn; torn from its bed,

it would be carried down stream, to be devoured by the trout

or the eel, or to perish amid the waste of waters. We felt on

these occasions pretty safe. Our principal enemies were

dispersed: the gulls sought worms in the ploughed uplands;

the kingfisher and the solitary heron flew away to the

smaller streams, where the less turbid water permitted them

to see their prey. The cold, slimy, cruel eel, alone of all

our enemies, was then to be dreaded. Crawling along at the

bottom of the water, his flat wicked head pressed against the

gravel, so as to escape the force of the stream, the wily

beast would insinuate himself into every crevice or corner,

where a small fish might have taken shelter, or a drowned

worm be lodged, and all was prey to him." _The

Autobiography of a Salmon._

[3] "One had better throw open his pond or river to all the

poachers in the district than indulge in a taste for swans.

If any one doubts this, let him row up the Thames from

Weybridge to Chertsey, or on to Laleham, during the latter

end of the month of April or early in May, and take

particular and special notice of what the swans are doing. If

he has still any doubt, and likes to kill one or two and cut

them open, he will solve his doubts and do a service at the

same time; he may be fined for it, but he will certainly

suffer for a good action and in a good cause. A swan can and

will devour a gallon of fish-spawn every day while the spawn

remains unhatched, if he can get it; and it is easily found.

I leave the reader to calculate what the few hundreds (I

might almost say thousands) on the Thames devour in the

course of two or three months. Their greediness and voracity

for fish-spawn must be witnessed to be believed. If this were

not so, the Thames ought to swarm to excess with fish,

whereas it is but poorly supplied. Here is a little

calculation. Suppose each swan only to take a quart of spawn

per diem, which is a very low average indeed; suppose each

quart to contain fifty-thousand eggs (not a tithe of what it

does contain). I am not speaking of salmon and trout here,

their ova being much larger; suppose only two hundred swans

(about a fourth, perhaps, of the number really employed) are

at work at the spawn, and give them only a fortnight for the

period of their ravages. Now what is the result we get? Why,

a little total of one hundred and forty million. One hundred

and forty million of eggs! Suppose only half of those eggs to

become fish, and we have a loss of seventy millions of fish

every year to the River Thames--a heavy price to pay for the

picturesque, particularly when the reality may perhaps be

doubled, or trebled, or even quadrupled." Francis Francis.

When the eggs of salmon and trout have been submitted to the action of

clear running water for a few months they begin to hatch. Prior to this

the young fish may be seen inside packed away in a most beautiful

manner. The embryo increases in bulk until on some warm April day the

tiny fish bursts its shell and finds itself in a wide world of waters.

Individual eggs may be seen to hatch, and the process is most

interesting. First the shell splits at the part corresponding to the

back. Then a tiny head with golden eyes appears, and after two or three

convulsive waves of his little tail the now useless shells fall from

off him. He seems to enjoy the watery element in which he finds

himself, for away he swims as fast as his tiny fins and wriggling tail

will carry him, round and round in a circle, until presently he sinks

down again to the sheltering gravel, for the first time breathing

freely by his delicate gills. Every young salmon and trout has a tiny

umbilical sac attached, and upon the contents of which it must feed

until it has learnt to look out for itself, a period of from six to

eight weeks. Frank Buckland has stated that no other animal increases

so rapidly at so little cost, and becomes such a valuable article of

food as the salmon. At three days old it is nearly two grains in

weight; at sixteen months it has increased to two ounces, or four

hundred and eighty times its first weight; at twenty months old, after

the smolt has been a few months in the sea, it becomes a grilse of

eight and a half pounds, having increased sixty-eight times in three or

four months; at two and three-quarter years old it becomes a salmon of

twelve pounds to fifteen pounds; after which its increased rate of

growth has not been satisfactorily ascertained, but by the time it

becomes thirty pounds it has increased one hundred and fifteen thousand

two hundred times the weight it was at first.

The only parts of a young salmon or trout which is fully developed

immediately it leaves the egg are its eyes. These are golden with a

silver sheen, and beautifully bright--the great aids in steering clear

of an almost innumerable set of enemies which this new stage of

existence brings. And it is really difficult to say whether these game

fishes have more enemies when in the egg or after they are hatched. Of

some of the former we have already spoken, and now let us look to the

latter.

The heron is a great trout-stream poacher, and destroys quantities of

immature fish. This has long been known, but the fact received striking

confirmation from an incident which occurred at the rearing-ponds at

Stormontfield. Here a heron was shot as it left off fishing, when it

immediately disgorged _fifty fry_. In the trout stream the heron

stands looking more like a lump of drift-stuff caught in the bushes

than an animate object. Gaunt, consumptive, and sentinel-like, the bird

watches with crest depressed, standing upon one leg. At other times it

wades cautiously with lowered head and outstretched neck, each step

being taken by a foot drawn gently out of the water, and as quietly

replaced in advance. Occasionally the wader steps into a deep hole, but

this causes not the slightest flurry. The walk is changed into a sort

of swimming, and paddling deep in the water until the feet again touch

firm ground. Woe to the trout or samlet that comes within range of the

heron's terrible pike, for it is at once impaled and gulped down. This

impalement is given with great force, and a wounded heron has been

known to drive its strong bill right through a stout stick. If a fish

is missed a sharp look-out is kept for its line of escape, and a

stealthy step made towards it. Should the distance be beyond range of

the bird's vision, a few flaps of the wings are tried in the eagerness

of pursuit. Nothing from the size of fry to mature fish comes amiss to

the heron, and the young whilst still in the nest consume great

quantities. Their swallow is insatiable, though sometimes they gaff an

individual which is difficult to dispose of. Shooting late one evening

in summer we were standing by a stream the banks of which were riddled

with the holes of water-voles. It was almost dark, when a large bird

flapped slowly over the fields and alighted by the bank. It took its

stand, and as we lay low its sketchy form was sharply outlined against

the sky. It was a heron; and for an hour among the dank weeds and wet

grass we watched it feed. After a prolonged struggle with some object

in the water it rose. Just as it did so we fired, and running up to the

winged bird were in time to see a live vole which it had disgorged. As

an example of "the biter bit," it is related that a heron was seen one

evening going to a piece of water to feed; the spot was visited the

next morning, when it was discovered that the bird had stuck its beak

through the head of an eel, piercing both eyes; the eel thus held had

coiled itself so tightly round the neck of the heron as to stop the

bird's respiration, and both were dead. Upon another occasion a heron

is said to have swallowed a stoat, but in this case also the prey was

promptly disgorged. An authoritative statement has been made to the

effect that the heron's services in the destruction of pike, coarse

fish, rats, and water-beetles may fairly be set off against its

depredations in trout-streams. But to this we must dissent; and if a

trout stream and a heronry are to flourish in the same neighbourhood,

the former must be covered in with netting, especially during the

spawning season.

Another bird which is an enemy to both salmon and trout in their fry

stage is the black-headed gull. This bird with its laughing cry hovers

over the stream and never lets slip an opportunity of snapping up a

brown trout or silvery samlet that has left its place of refuge. The

late Francis Francis was fully aware of this fact, and he set down both

gulls and terns as most notorious offenders. A couple of hundred gulls

will devour at least a thousand smolts per day; and the birds may be

seen at Loch Lomond travelling to and from Gull Island and the burns

all day, each with a trout or parr in its beak. This must have a

considerable effect on the future supply of grilse in the Tweed.

As to what part the pretty white-breasted dipper plays in the economy

of salmon rivers and trout streams naturalists are by no means agreed.

Frank Buckland said that one might as well shoot a swallow skimming

over a turnip-field as a dipper over the spawning beds. And this view

of the dipper's economy we believe to be the right and just one. Last

autumn we had occasion to walk over many miles of trout streams. In

these, fish of every size were upon the gravel beds which constitute

the spawning "redds." Almost at every turn the white chemisette of the

brook bird glinted from some grey stone and went piping before us up

stream. As many of these were seen actually rummaging among the

pebbles, some few were shot for examination. Although the post-mortems

were carefully conducted, no trace in any single instance of the

presence of ova of either trout or salmon could be found, but only

larvæ of water-haunting insects, roughly representing the four great

families of trout-flies. In opposition to the above, however, it must

be admitted that individual dippers have been seen with tiny fish in

their bills, and even to feed their young ones upon them. Birds in

confinement have also been fed upon minnows, but this _penchant_

might be an acquired one. It may be asserted, then, that the ouzel has

been known to eat fish, but that fish forms no chief portion of his

food; and finally, that it would be quite incorrect to describe it as a

fish-eating bird, and therefore as an enemy to salmon and trout. The

birds will not long stay where the water is slow or logged; they must

have the white foam, the torrent, the pebbly reaches, and the shallows.

In fact, they could not obtain their food under conditions other than

these. The mountain burns abound with various aquatic insects and their

larvæ, and in limestone districts in innumerable fresh-water molluscs.

As already shown, not only is the ouzel innocent of destroying eggs of

salmon and trout, but it is indirectly beneficial to a fishery. It is

well known that among the chief enemies to spawn are the larvæ known as

caddisworms, that of the dragon-fly, May-fly and stone-fly, and also of

the various water-beetles. Now all these have been found in the stomach

of the dipper, and therefore it must confer a decided benefit on the

salmon and trout streams which it haunts.

Of all our British birds none is so beautiful or so secluded in its

habits as the kingfisher; and its presence is peculiarly in keeping

with the rapid, rocky trout streams which it loves to haunt. Although

glowing with metallic lustres, and beautiful in its adaptation and

every movement, the kingfisher builds but a careless nest, a loose

structure of dry fish bones--the hard indigestible parts of its food

which, in common with birds of prey, it has the power of ejecting in

pellets by the mouth. Again, let us look out the bird in its haunts. We

follow the course of the hazel-fringed stream over a mile of its pebbly

reaches; now a dipper flits from a green mossy stone, and a pair of

sandpipers start with tremulous wings and skirt the shingle-strewn

banks. Among the flags the water-voles gnaw the sweet saccharine

aquatic plants, and the water-hens run and hide under the friendly

roots of an overhanging thorn. The May-fly is upon the stream, the

silvery fresh run fish are all animation, and even the great black

trout in the "willow dub" condescends to take a fat blue-bottle that is

spinning round and round the pool. Dragon-flies dart hither and

thither, bronze fly and bee are upon the wing, and the carpet of grass

and flowers is alive with innumerable insects, all busily engaged in

fertilising their floral friends, or revelling in nectar, and gilded

with golden pollen. The lime-trees are "a murmurous haunt of summer

wings," and the breath of summer is on our cheek. Over there is an

overhanging, leafless bough and upon it has just alighted a kingfisher.

At first its form is motionless, then it assumes more animation, and

anon is all eye and ear. Then it falls, hangs for a moment in the air

like a kestrel, and returns to its perch. Again it darts with unerring

aim and secures something. This is tossed, beaten and broken with a

formidable beak, and swallowed head foremost. This process is again and

again repeated, and we find that the prey is small fish. From watching

an hour we are entranced with the beauty of the fluttering, quivering

thing as the sun glints from its green and gold vibrations in mid-air.

We gain some estimation, too, of the vast amount of immature fish which

a pair of kingfishers and their young must destroy in a single

season.[4] Later in summer the young brood may be seen with open

quivering wings, constantly calling as the parent birds fly up and down

stream. Their food consists almost entirely of fish throughout the

year, though during the rigour and frosts of winter they betake

themselves to the estuaries of tidal rivers, where their food of

molluscs and shore-haunting creatures are daily replenished by the

tides. Kingfishers are among the most persistent of trout-stream

poachers, and as many as eighty of these beautiful birds have been

killed in a season on a famous nursery in the midlands. As in the case

of the heron, nothing will save the fry from these marauders but

covering in the rearing ponds with the finest wire net. However one may

wish to protect the kingfisher, there is no denying the fact of its

_penchant_ for fish, especially the fry of salmon and trout; the

bad habit is bred in him.

[4] "Then the kingfisher, with rufous breast and glorious

mantle of blue, would dart like a plummet from his roost, and

seize unerringly any little truant which passed within his

ken. The appetite of this bird was miraculous; I never saw

him satisfied. He would sit for hours on a projecting bough,

his body almost perpendicular, his head thrown back between

his shoulders; eyeing with an abstracted air the heavens

above or the rocks around him, he seemed intent only upon

exhibiting the glorious lustre of his plumage, and the

brilliant colours with which his azure back was shaded; but

let a careless samlet stray beneath him, and in a twinkling

his nonchalant attitude was abandoned. With a turn so quick

that the eye could scarce follow it, his tail took the place

of his head, and, falling rather than flying, he would seize

his victim, toss him once into the air, catch him as he fell,

head foremost, and swallow him in a second. This manoeuvre

he would repeat from morning till night; such a greedy,

insatiable little wretch I never saw!"--_The Autobiography

of a Salmon._

The fact of salmon and trout devouring the spawn of their own kind has

been already referred to, and unfortunately the practice is continued

after the eggs are hatched. The big fish sometimes so terrify the tiny

trout and samlets that the latter throw themselves clear out of the

water and lay gasping on the pebbles, while the would-be devourer beats

about the shallows disappointed at losing his prey. An old "kelt"

salmon has been seen to devour fifty of his own progeny for breakfast;

and the pike is a greater water-wolf still. This fish has been known to

increase at the enormous rate of from eight to ten pounds a year when

favourably placed for feeding. So voracious a creature is the pike, and

furnished with such digestion, that it will destroy a half-pound trout

a day for twelve months--a terrible drain upon any stream. Then it has

an all-capacious maw for silvery smolts as they are making their way

down to the sea, and of these at certain seasons it devours myriads. Of

course pike keep coarse fish under, which are indirectly injurious to

trout, and in this way confer a benefit upon the angler. There is

another way in which he is beneficial, and that is as a scavenger. A

diseased salmon or trout never lives more than a few minutes in his

presence, for he gulps down fish, fungus, and all. In this connection

there is one fact which ought not to be overlooked. Of late years

disease has played terrible havoc in some of the best rivers in the

country. In one of these, known to the writer, scarcely a fish is

caught which does not show scars left by the disease--want of tail,

partial loss of fins, and white patches where the fungus has previously

grown. That numbers of the fish attacked do survive there can be no

question; and that the disease may be prevented at the cost of a few

fish we have but little doubt. This may be considered a bold assertion;

but in these days of artificial rearing, re-stocking, and preservation,

anglers and angling associations are apt either to forget or to ignore

the balance of nature. Now, nature rarely overlooks an insult. Destroy

her appointed instruments and beware of her revenge. That the salmon

and trout may live a whole host of stream-haunting creatures are

condemned, and that often upon the most insufficient evidence.

The creature against which the angler "breathes hot roarings out" is

the otter. But how few fish does the otter really destroy! The evidence

to be gathered by those who live along its streams all goes to show

that eels and freshwater crayfish form the staple of its food. In

search of these, it wanders miles in a night and will not partake of

soft-bodied fish so long as they can be found. The economy of the otter

ought not to be overlooked in connection with sport and our fish

supply. Probably its increasing rarity has as much to do with the

disease alluded to as had the extermination of the nobler birds of prey

with the grouse disease. A falcon always takes the easiest chance at

its prey; and an otter captures the slowest fish. In each case they

kill off the weakest, the most diseased, and thereby secure the

survival of the fittest. Most of the newspaper paragraphs anent the

doings of otters are mere legendary stories without any foundation in

fact. The otter is not a "fish-slicer." Salmon found upon the rocks

with the flesh bitten from the shoulders are oftener than not there by

agents other than _Lutra_. A great deal of unnatural history has

been written concerning the "water-dog," mostly by those who have never

had opportunity of studying the otter in its haunts. That it

occasionally destroys fish we will not deny; but this liking has become

such a stereotyped fact (?) in natural history that it is glibly

repeated, parrot-like, and has continued so long, that most have come

to accept it. Ask the otter-hunter, the old angler of the rocky

northern streams, the field naturalist who has many a night stretched

his length along a slab of rock to observe the otter at home--and each

has the same answer. Abundance of otters and plenty of trout exist side

by side; and where the fastnesses of the former are impregnable, there

disease is foreign to the stream. Many otters, many trout; this is a

bit of nature's economy there is no gainsaying. Here is an actual

incident. There is a certain reach on a well-known trout stream which

is so overgrown with wood and coppice as to render it unfishable. This

reach swarms with handsome well-fed trout; and yet far back among the

rocky shelves of the river a brood of otters are brought forth

annually, have been in fact time out of mind. And yet another incident.

Of forty-five dead otters killed in hunting, in two only were there

remains of fish food, and this consisted of eels--deadly enemies either

to trout stream or salmon river. These forty-five otters, for the most

part, were killed before six in the morning, and consequently when

their stomachs were most likely to contain traces of what had been

taken in their night's fishing.

One of the most curious enemies of our freshwater fishes is a small

floating water-weed, the bladderwort. Along its branchlets are a number

of small green vesicles or bladders, which, being furnished with minute

jaws, seize upon tiny fish, which are assimilated into its substance.

This is a subtle poacher, the true character of which has only lately

been detected. The bladderwort is a fairly common plant, and no very

special interest attached to it ere its fish-eating propensities were

discovered. Its tiny vesicles were known to contain air, and the only

use of these so far as was known was to keep the plant afloat--a

belief, be it remarked, all the more reasonable because many aquatic

plants actually have such air receptacles for that very purpose. The

tiny bladders attached to the leaves and leaf-stalks are each furnished

with a door, the whole acting on the eel-trap principle, entrance being

easy but exit impossible. There is nothing very formidable about the

delicate green jaws of the vegetable trap, only that any tiny water

creature that ventures in to look round out of mere curiosity never by

any chance emerges alive. The first time that the bladder-wort was

actually caught at its fish-poaching proclivities, so to speak, was by

Professor Moseley, of Oxford. He and a friend had, in a large glass

bowl, a plant of this species and also a number of young roach just

hatched. The murderous plant held several of the tiny fish in its jaws;

and upon an experiment being tried in a separate vessel, it was found

that a single plant had captured no less than a dozen fish in the space

of six hours. One of these was caught by the head, another by the tail,

a third by the yolk-sac, and in another instance two bladders had

seized the same fish, one holding on at each extremity. In spite of all

this tiny ferocity it must be admitted that this little plant poacher

is more interesting than dangerous, and so long as it confines its

attention to coarse fish neither the salmon-fisher nor trout-angler

will concern himself much about its aquatic depredations.

There is one wholesale method of destruction which particularly affects

salmon, which cannot be passed over. This is done by almost innumerable

nets, and is usually practised at the mouths of rivers and generally

without the slightest regard to the economy of the fish supply. And it

has been found that as salmon and the means of transit increase, so

does the number of destructive nets. Theoretically, legislation is

levelled against this wanton destruction, but practically the law is a

dead letter. At every tide, in certain seasons, hundreds of thousands

of salmon-fry and smolts are sacrificed; and in a certain firth it is

recorded how a fisherman in his nets walked, in many places, knee deep

in dead smolts, and that the ground for a considerable distance was

silvered with their scales. Under these circumstances the samlets

sometimes accumulate to such an extent that they have to be carted on

to the nearest land and used as manure. This waste of valuable fish

food is so great that it can hardly be reckoned, and in future years

must tell greatly upon the British yield of salmon. Mill-wheels[5] and

hatches, too, are often great sources of destruction.

[5] "In this neighbourhood I escaped, by pure good fortune, a

danger that I afterwards learnt proved fatal to

thousands--nay, tens of thousands--of my young companions.

The stream had apparently divided, and whilst I followed the

course of the right-hand one, the greater number passed down

the wider but less rapid left-hand division. Here they

speedily encountered a terrific mill-wheel, and, dashing on

one side, they found their progress stopped by a small net,

which being placed under them, they were landed literally by

bushels. My informant, who escaped by passing under the

mill-wheel at the imminent risk of being crushed to death,

assured me that the bodies of our unlucky brethren were used

as manure! And, degrading as the suggestion is, it seems not

impossible, for the numbers taken could not be sold or used

for food."--_The Autobiography of a Salmon._

Another enemy to salmon and trout is the great black cormorant--a

poacher that studies their migratory and local movements, and acts

accordingly. It is the habit of this bird to visit small rivers which

flow into the sea, especially during the late winter and early spring

months. At these seasons the smolts are preparing to come down, and the

kelts of salmon and sea trout are assembling in the large pools prior

to their return to salt water. A brace of cormorants which were shot at

their fishing were found to contain twenty-six and fourteen salmon

smolts respectively, and a trustworthy water bailiff asserts that he

once watched a couple of cormorants hunt and kill a kelt salmon, and

that after dragging it ashore they commenced tearing it up, when they

were driven off. It was once thought that both the cormorant and heron

only ate that which they could swallow whole, but this is now known not

to be strictly correct.

And now, finally, we come to the man poacher. Fish poaching is

practised none the less for the high preservation and stricter watching

which is so characteristic of the times. In outlying country towns with

salmon and trout streams in the vicinity it is carried on to an almost

incredible extent. There are many men who live by it, and women to whom

it constitutes a thriving trade. These know neither times nor seasons,

and, like the heron and the kingfisher, poach the whole year round.

They provide the chief business of the county police-court, and the

great source of profit to the local fish and game dealer. The wary

poacher never starts for his fishing grounds without having first

secured his customer; and it is surprising with what lax code of morals

the provincial public will deal when the silent night worker is one to

the bargain. Of course the public always gets cheap fish and fresh

fish--so fresh, indeed, that the life has not yet gone out of it. It is

a perfectly easy matter to poach fish, and the difficulty lies in

conveying them into the towns and villages. The poacher never knows but

that he may meet some county constable along the unfrequented country

roads, and consequently never carries his game upon him. This he

secretes in stacks and ricks and disused farm buildings until such

times as it may be safely sent for. Country carriers, early morning

milk carts, and women are all employed in getting fish into town. In

this the women are most successful. Sometimes they may be seen

labouring under a heavy load carried in a sack, with faggots and rotten

sticks protruding from the mouth; or again with a large basket

innocently covered with crisp green cresses which effectually hide the

bright silvery fish beneath.

The methods of the fish poacher are many. The chances of success, too,

are greatly in his favour, for he works silently and always in the

night. He walks abroad during the day and makes mental notes of men and

fish. He knows the beats of the watchers, and has the waterside, as it

were, by heart. He can work as well in the dark as in the light, and

this is essential to his silent trade. During summer and when the water

becomes low the fish congregate in deep "dubs." This they do for

protection, and if overhung with trees there is always here abundance

of food. If a poacher intends to net a "dub" he carefully examines

every inch of its bottom beforehand. If it has been thorned, he

carefully removes these small thorned bushes with stones attached, and

thrown in by the watchers to entangle the poachers' nets and so allow

the fish to escape. At night the poacher comes, unrolls his long net on

the pebbles, and then commences operations at the bottom of the river

reach. The net is dragged by a man at each side, a third wading after

to lift it over the stakes, and so preventing the fish from escaping.

When the end of the pool is reached the trout are simply drawn out upon

the pebbles. This is repeated through the night until half-a-dozen

pools are netted, and maybe depopulated of their fish. Netting of this

description is a wholesale method of destruction, always supposing that

the poachers are allowed their own time. It requires to be done slowly,

however, and if alarmed they can do nothing but abandon their net and

run. This is necessarily large, and when thoroughly wet is most

cumbersome and exceedingly heavy. The capturing of a net stops the

depredations of the poachers for a while, as these being large take

long to make. For narrow streams pretty much the same method as that

indicated above is used, only the net is smaller, and to it are

attached two poles. The method of working this is similar to that of

the last.

A species of poaching which the older hands rarely go in for is that of

poisoning. Chloride of lime is the agent most in use, as it does not

injure the edible parts. This is thrown into the river where fish are

known to be, and its deadly influence is soon seen. The fish become

poisoned and weakened, and soon float belly uppermost. This at once

renders them conspicuous, and as they are on the surface of the stream,

they are simply lifted out of the water in a landing-net. This is a

wholesale and cowardly method, as it frequently poisons the fish for

miles down stream; it not only kills the larger fish, but destroys

great quantities of immature ones which are wholly unfit for food.

Trout which come by their death in this way have the usually pink parts

of a dull white, with the eyes and gill-covers of the same colour and

covered with a thin white film. This substance, too, is much used in

mills on the banks of trout streams, and probably more fish are

destroyed by this kind of pollution in a month than the most inveterate

poacher will kill in a year.

Throughout summer fish are in season, but the really serious poaching

is practised during close time. When spawning, the senses of both

salmon and trout seem to become dulled, and they are not at all

difficult to approach in the water. The fish seek the higher reaches to

spawn, and stay for a considerable time on the pebble beds. The salmon

offer fair marks, and the poacher obtains them by spearing. A pronged

instrument is driven into the fleshy shoulders of the fish, and it is

hauled out on to the bank. In this way sometimes more fish are obtained

in a single night than can be carried away; and when the gang is chased

by the watchers the fish have generally to be left behind, as they are

difficult things to carry. The flesh of spawning fish is loose and

watery, and is most insipid and tasteless. It is, however, sold to the

poorest class of people at a few pence per pound. In one outlying

village during last close season poached salmon was so common that the

cottagers fed their poultry upon it through the whole winter. It is

said that several fish were taken each over twenty pounds in weight.

Another way of securing salmon and trout from the spawning "redds" is

by means of "click-hooks." These are simply large salmon-hooks bound

together shaft to shaft and attached to a long cord; a bit of lead

balances them and adds weight. These are used in deep rivers, where

spearing by wading is impracticable. When a fish is seen the hooks are

simply thrown beyond it, and then gently dragged until they come

immediately beneath; a sharp "click" usually sends them into the soft

under-parts of the fish, which is then drawn out. That natural poacher,

the pike, is frequently ridded from trout streams in this fashion. Of

course, poaching with click-hooks requires to be done in the light, or

by the aid of an artificial one. Lights attract salmon and trout just

as they attract birds, and tar brands are frequently used by poachers.

Shooting is sometimes resorted to, but for this class of poaching the

habits and beats of the water bailiffs require to be accurately known.

The method has the advantage of being quick, and a gun in skilful hands

and at a short distance may be used without injuring the fleshy parts

of the body. That deadly bait, salmon roe, is now rarely used, the

method of preparing it having evidently gone out with the old-fashioned

poachers, who used it with such deadly effect.

The capture of either poachers or their nets is often difficult to

accomplish. The former wind their sinuous way, snake-like, through the

wet meadows in approaching the rivers, and their nets are rarely kept

at home. These they secrete about farm buildings, in dry ditches, or

among the bushes in close proximity to their poaching grounds. Were

they kept at home the obtaining of a search warrant by the police or

local angling association would always render their custody a critical

one. They are sometimes kept in the poachers' houses, though only for a

short period when about to be used. At this time the police have found

them secreted in the chimney, between the bed and the mattress, or even

wound about the portly persons of the poachers' wives. The women are

not always simply aiders and abettors, but in poaching, sometimes play

a more important rôle. They have frequently been taken red-handed by

the watchers. The vocation of these latter is a hard one. They work at

night, and require to be most on the alert during rough and wet

weather--in the winter, when the fish are spawning. Sometimes they must

remain still for hours in freezing clothes; and even in summer they not

unfrequently lie all night in dank and wet herbage. They see the night

side of nature, and many of them are fairly good naturalists. If a

lapwing gets up and screams in the darkness they know how to interpret

the sound, as also a hare rushing wildly past. It must be confessed,

however, that at all points the fish poacher is cleverer and of readier

wit than the river watcher.

Poachers and Poaching · 第 9 / 14 章