BY W. CARLETON.

When a superstition is once impressed strongly upon the popular

credulity, the fiction always assumes the shape and form which the

peculiar imagination of the country is constituted to body forth.

This faculty depends so much on climate, temperament, religion, and

occupation, that the notions entertained of supernatural beings, though

generally based upon one broad feature peculiar to all countries, differ

so essentially respecting the form, character, habits, and powers of

these beings, that they appear to have been drawn from sources widely

removed. To an inquiring mind there can be no greater proof than this of

their being nothing but the creations of our own brain, and of assuming

that shape only which has uniformly been impressed upon our imagination

at the precise period of life when such impressions are strongest and

most permanent, and the reason which ought to combat and investigate

them least capable of doing so. If these inane bugbears possessed the

consistence of truth and reality, their appearance to mankind would be

always uniform, unchangeable, and congruous; but they are beheld, so to

speak, through different prejudices and impressions, and consequently

change with the media through which they are seen. Hence their different

shape, character, and attributes in different countries, and the frequent

absence of rational analogy with respect to them even in the same.

Where now are the multitudinous creations of the old Greek and Roman

mythologies? Where are their Lares, their Penates, their Fauns, Satyrs,

Nymphs, Dryads, Hamadryads, Gods, and Goddesses? And yet the peasantry

of the two most enlightened nations of antiquity were so firmly fixed in

a belief of their distinct and individual existence, that the worship of

them formed an essential part of their religion. Where are they now? And

who believes in the existence of a Faun, a Dryad, or a Hamadryad? They

melted into what they were--nothing--before the lustre of Revelation,

which, by bringing the truth of immortality to light, banished the whole

host of such incongruous monsters from the earth, and impressed the

imagination of mankind with truer notions and simpler imagery. The pure

but severe morality of the Christian religion, by making man sensible of

his responsibility in another life, opened up to the good and rational

the bright hopes of future happiness. But we have our fears as well as

our hopes, and as these preponderate in proportion to our fitness for

death, so will we view the world that is to come either with joy or

terror. Every truth is abused and perverted by man’s moral delinquencies:

and the consequence is, that an idle fear of ghosts and apparitions is an

abuse of the doctrine of our immortality. Judgment and eternal life were

brought near us by Revelation, but we fear them more than we love them,

and hence the terrors of our imagination on thinking of any thing that

is beyond the grave. As the old monsters of the mythologies disappeared

before reason and religion, so also will ghosts, fairies, and all such

nonsense, vanish when men shall be taught to reason upon them as they

ought, and to entertain higher notions of God than to believe that his

purposes could be thwarted by the power or malignity of a fairy. Why,

what, for instance, is every ghost story that we have heard, granting

them to be true, but a direct revelation, and so far antiscriptural and

impious? What new truth has the information of a spectre ever conveyed

to us? What knowledge of futurity beyond that which we already know have

these dialogues with the dead ever brought to light? What view of our

moral, religious, or social duties, with which we were not acquainted

before, have apparitions ever taught us? None. Away, then, with these

empty and pusillanimous chimeras, which are but the mere hallucinations

of a weak judgment, acted upon and misled by a strong fancy or a guilty

conscience.

The force of imagination alone is capable of conjuring up and shaping

out that which never had existence, and that too with as much apparent

distinctness and truth as if it was real. We all know that in the ease of

a female who is pregnant, a strong impression made upon the imagination

of the mother will be visible on the body of the child. And why?

Because she firmly believes that it will be so. If she did not, no such

impression would be communicated to the infant. But when such effects

are produced in physical matters, what will not the consequence be in

those that are purely mental and imaginative? Go to the lunatic asylum

or the madhouse, and there it may be seen in all its unreal delusion and

positive terror.

Before I close this portion of my little disquisition, I shall relate

an anecdote connected with it, of which I myself was the subject. Some

years ago I was seized with typhus fever of so terrific a character,

that for a long time I lay in a state hovering between life and death,

unconscious as a log, without either hope or fear. At length a crisis

came, and, aided by the strong stamina of an unbroken constitution, I

began to recover, and every day to regain my consciousness more and

more. As yet, however, I was very far from being out of danger, for I

felt the malady to be still so fiery and oppressive, that I was not

surprised when told that the slightest mistake either in my medicine or

regimen would have brought on a relapse. At all events, thank God, my

recovery advanced; but, at the same time, the society that surrounded me

was wild and picturesque in the highest degree. Never indeed was such

a combination of the beautiful and hideous seen, unless in the dreams

of a feverish brain like mine, or the distorted reason of a madman. At

one side of my bed, looking in upon me with a most hellish and satanic

leer, was a face, compared with which the vulgar representations of the

devil are comeliness itself, whilst on the other was a female countenance

beaming in beauty that was ethereal--angelic. Thus, in fact, was my

whole bed surrounded; for they stood as thickly as they could, sometimes

flitting about and crushing and jostling one another, but never leaving

my bed for a moment. Here were the deformed features of a dwarf, there an

angel apparently fresh from heaven; here was a gigantic demon with his

huge mouth placed longitudinally in his face, and his nose across it,

whilst the Gorgon-like coxcomb grinned as if he were vain, and had cause

to be vain, of his beauty. This fellow annoyed me much, and would, I

apprehend, have done me an injury, only for the angel on the other side.

He made perpetual attempts to come at me, but was as often repulsed by

that seraphic creature. Indeed, I feared none of them so much as I did

the Gorgon, who evidently had a design on me, and would have rendered my

situation truly pitiable, were it not for the protection of the seraph,

who always succeeded in keeping him aloof. At length he made one furious

rush as if he meant to pounce upon me, and in self-preservation I threw

my right arm to the opposite side, and, grasping the seraph by the nose,

I found I had caught my poor old nurse by that useful organ, while she

was in the act of offering me a drink. For several days I was in this

state, the victim of images produced by disease, and the inflammatory

excitement of brain consequent upon it. Gradually, however, they began

to disappear, and I felt manifest relief, for they were succeeded by

impressions as amusing now as the former had been distressing. I imagined

that there was a serious dispute between my right foot and my left, as

to which of them was entitled to precedency; and, what was singular, my

right leg, thigh, hand, arm and shoulder, most unflinchingly supported

the right foot, as did the other limbs the left. The head alone, with

an impartiality that did it honour, maintained a strict neutrality. The

truth was, I imagined that all my limbs were endowed with a consciousness

of individual existence, and I felt quite satisfied that each and all

of them possessed the faculty of reason. I have frequently related this

anecdote to my friends; but, I know not how it happened, I never could

get them to look upon it in any other light than as a specimen of that

kind of fiction which is indulgently termed “drawing the long bow.” It

is, however, as true as that I now exist, and relate the fact; and,

what is more, the arguments which I am about to give are substantially

the same that were used by the rival claimants and their respective

supporters. The discussion, I must observe, was opened by the left foot,

as being the discontented party, and, like all discontented parties, its

language was so very violent, that, had its opinions prevailed, there

is no doubt but they would have succeeded in completely overturning my

constitution.

_Left foot._ Brother (addressing the right with a great show of

affection, but at the same time with a spasmodic twitch of strong

discontentment in the big toe), Brother, I don’t know how it is that you

have during our whole lives always taken the liberty to consider yourself

a better foot than I am; and I would feel much obliged to you if you

would tell me why it is that you claim this superiority over me. Are we

not both equal in every thing?

_Right foot._ Be quiet, my dear brother. We _are_ equal in every thing,

and why, therefore, are you discontented?

_Left foot._ Because you presume to consider yourself the better and more

useful foot.

_Right foot._ Let us not dispute, my dear brother; each is equally

necessary to the other. What could I do without _you_? Nothing, or at

least very little; and what could you do without _me_? Very little

indeed. We were not made to quarrel.

_Left foot_ (_very hot_). I am not disposed to quarrel, but I trust you

will admit that I am as good as you, every way your equal, and begad

in many things your superior. Do you hear that? _I_ am not disposed to

quarrel, you rascal, and how dare you say so?

Here there was a strong sensation among all the right members, who felt

themselves insulted through this outrage offered to their chief supporter.

_Right foot._ Since you choose to insult me without provocation, I must

stand upon my right----

_Left_ (_shoving off to a distance_). RIGHT!--there, again, what right

have you to be termed “_right_” any more than I?--(“Bravo!--go it,

_Left_; pitch into him; we are equal to him and his,” from the friends of

the Left. The matter was now likely to become serious, and to end in a

row.)

“What’s the matter there below?” said the Head; “don’t be fools, and make

yourselves ridiculous. What would either of you be with a crutch or a

cork-leg? which is only another name for a wooden shoe, any day.”

_Right foot._ Since he provokes me, I tell him, that ever since the world

began, the prejudice of mankind in all nations has been in favour of the

right foot and the right hand. (Strong sensation among the left members).

Surely he ought not to be ignorant of the proverb, which says, when a man

is peculiarly successful in any thing he undertakes, “that man knew how

to go about it--_he put the right foot foremost_!” (Cheers from the right

party.)

_Left._ That’s mere special pleading--the right foot there does not mean

you, because you happen to be termed such; but it means the foot which,

from its position under the circumstances, happens to be the proper one.

(Loud applause from the left members.)

_Right foot._ You know you are weak and feeble and awkward when compared

to me, and can do little of yourself. (Hurra! that’s a poser!)

_Left._ Why, certainly, I grant I am the gentleman, and that you are very

useful to me, you plebeian. (“Bravo!” from the left hand; “ours is the

aristocratic side--hear the operatives! Come, hornloof, what have you to

say to that?”)

_Right hand_ (_addressing his opponent._) You may be the aristocratic

party if you will, but we are the useful. Who are the true defenders of

the constitution, you poor sprig of nobility?

_Left hand._ The heart is with us, the seat and origin of life and power.

Can you boast as much? (Loud cheers.)

_Right foot._ Why, have you never heard it said of an excellent and

worthy man--a fellow of the right sort, a trump--as a mark of his

sterling qualities, “his heart’s in the _right_ place!” How then can it

be in the _left_? (Much applause.)

_Left._ Which is an additional proof that mine is _that_ place and not

yours. Yes, you rascal, we _have_ the heart, and you cannot deny it.

_Right._ We admit he resides with you, but it is merely because you

are the weaker side, and require his protection. The best part of his

energies are given to us, and we are satisfied.

_Left._ You admit, then, that our party keeps yours in power, and why not

at once give up your right to precedency?--why not resign?

_Right._ Let us put it to the vote.

_Left._ With all my heart.

It was accordingly put to the vote; but on telling the house, it was

found that the parties were equal. Both then appealed very strenuously to

Mr Speaker, the Head, who, after having heard their respective arguments,

shook himself very gravely, and informed them (much after the manner of

Sir Roger De Coverley) that “much might be said on both sides.” “But one

thing,” said he, “I beg both parties to observe, and very seriously to

consider. In the first place, there would be none of this nonsense about

precedency, were it not for the feverish and excited state in which you

all happen to be at present. If you have common sense enough to wait

until you all get somewhat cooler, there is little doubt but you will

feel that you cannot do without each other. As for myself, as I said

before, I give no specific opinion upon disputes which would never have

taken place were it not for the heat of feeling which is between you.

I know that much might and has been said upon both sides; but as for

me, I nod significantly to both parties, and say nothing. One thing,

however, I do say, and it is this--take care you, _right foot_, and you,

_left foot_, that by pursuing this senseless quarrel too far it may not

happen that you will both get stretched and tied up together in a wooden

surtout, when precedency will be out of the question, and nothing but a

most pacific stillness shall remain between you for ever. I shake, and

have concluded.”

Now, this case, which as an illustration of my argument possesses a good

deal of physiological interest, is another key to the absurd doctrine of

apparitions. Here was I at the moment strongly and seriously impressed

with a belief that a quarrel was taking place between my two feet about

the right of going foremost. Nor was this absurdity all. I actually

believed for the time that all my limbs were endowed with separate life

and reason. And why? All simply because my whole system was in a state

of unusually strong excitement, and the nerves and blood stimulated by

disease into a state of derangement. Such, in fact, is the condition in

which every one must necessarily be who thinks he sees a spirit; and

this, which is known to be an undeniable fact, being admitted, it follows

of course that the same causes will, other things being alike, produce

the same effects. For instance, does not the terror of an apparition

occasion a violent and increased action of the heart and vascular system,

similar to that of fever? Does not the very hair stand on end, not merely

when the imaginary ghost is seen, but when the very apprehension of it is

strong? Is not the action of the brain, too, accelerated in proportion to

that of the heart, and the nervous system in proportion to that of both?

What, then, is this but a fever for the time being, which is attended by

the very phantasms the fear of which created it; for in this case it so

happens that the cause and effect mutually reproduce each other.

The conversation detailed above is but a very meagre outline of what was

said during the discussion. The arguments were far more subtle than the

mere skeletons of them here put down, and very plentifully sprinkled

over with classical quotations, both of Latin and Greek, which are not

necessary now.

Hibbert mentions a case of imagination, which in a man is probably the

strongest and most unaccountable on record. It is that of a person--an

invalid--who imagined that at a certain hour of the day a carter or

drayman came into his bedroom, and, uncovering him, inflicted several

heavy stripes upon his body with the thong of his whip; and such was the

power of fancy here, that the marks of the lash were visible in black and

blue streaks upon his flesh. I am inclined to think, however, that this

stands very much in need of confirmation.

I have already mentioned a case of spectral illusion which occurred in

my native parish. I speak of Daly’s daughter, who saw what she imagined

to be the ghost of M’Kenna, who had been lost among the mountains. I

shall now relate another, connected with the fairies, of which I also

was myself an eye-witness. The man’s name, I think, was Martin, and he

followed the thoughtful and somewhat melancholy occupation of a weaver.

He was a bachelor, and wrought journey-work in every farmer’s house where

he could get employment; and notwithstanding his supernatural vision

of the fairies, he was considered to be both a quick and an excellent

workman. The more sensible of the country-people said he was deranged,

but the more superstitious of them maintained that he had a _Lianhan

Shee_, and saw them against his will. The Lianhan Shee is a malignant

fairy, which, by a subtle compact made with any one whom it can induce

by the fairest promises to enter into, secures a mastery over them by

inducing its unhappy victims to violate it; otherwise, it is and must be

like the oriental genie, their slave and drudge, to perform such tasks

as they wish to impose upon it. It will promise endless wealth to those

whom it is anxious to subjugate to its authority, but it is at once so

malignant and ingenious, that the party entering into the contract with

it is always certain by its manœuvres to break through his engagement,

and thus become slave in his turn. Such is the nature of this wild and

fearful superstition, which I think is fast disappearing, and is but

rarely known in the country. Martin was a thin pale man, when I saw him,

of a sickly look, and a constitution naturally feeble. His hair was a

light auburn, his beard mostly unshaven, and his hands of a singular

delicacy and whiteness, owing, I dare say, as much to the soft and easy

nature of his employment, as to his infirm health. In every thing else

he was as sensible, sober, and rational as any other man; but on the

topic of fairies, the man’s mania was peculiarly strong and immoveable.

Indeed, I remember that the expression of his eyes was singularly wild

and hollow, and his long narrow temples sallow and emaciated.

Now, this man did not lead an unhappy life, nor did the malady he

laboured under seem to be productive of either pain or terror to him,

although one might be apt to imagine otherwise. On the contrary, he

and the fairies maintained the most friendly intimacy, and their

dialogues--which I fear were woefully one-sided ones--must have been a

source of great pleasure to him, for they were conducted with much mirth

and laughter, on his part at least.

“Well, Frank, when did you see the fairies?”

“Whist! there’s two dozen of them in the shop (the weaving shop) this

minute. There’s a little ould fellow sittin’ on the top of the sleys, an’

all to be rocked while I’m weavin’. The sorrow’s in them, but they’re the

greatest little skamers alive, so they are. See, there’s another of them

at my dressin’[1] noggin. Go out o’ that, you _shingawn_; or, bad cess to

me if you don’t, but I’ll lave you a mark. Ha! out, you thief you!”

“Frank, aren’t you afear’d o’ them?”

“Is it me? Arra, what ’ud I be afear’d o’ them for? Sure they have no

power over me.”

“And why haven’t they, Frank?”

“Becaise I was baptized against them.”

“What do you mean by that?”

“Why, the priest that christened me was tould by my father to put in

the prayer against the fairies--an’ a priest can’t refuse it when he’s

axed--an’ he did so. Begorra, it’s well for me that he did--(let the

tallow alone, you little glutton--see, there’s a weeny thief o’ them

aitin’ my tallow)--becaise, you see, it was their intention to make me

king o’ the fairies.”

“Is it possible?”

“Devil a lie in it. Sure you may ax them, an’ they’ll tell you.”

“What size are they, Frank?”

“Oh, little wee fellows, with green coats an’ the purtiest little

shoes ever you seen. There’s two o’ them--both ould acquaintances o’

mine--runnin’ along the yarn beam. That ould fellow with the bob wig is

called Jim Jam, an’ the other chap with the three-cocked hat is called

Nickey Nick. Nickey plays the pipes. Nickey, give us a tune, or I’ll

malivogue you--come now, ‘Lough Erne Shore.’ Whist, now--listen!”

The poor fellow, though weaving as fast as he could all the time, yet

bestowed every possible mark of attention to the music, and seemed to

enjoy it as much as if it had been real. But who can tell whether that

which we look upon as a privation may not after all be a fountain of

increased happiness, greater perhaps than any which we ourselves enjoy? I

forget who the poet is who says,

Mysterious are thy laws;

The vision’s finer than the view;

Her landscape Nature never drew

So fair as fancy draws.

Many a time when a mere child not more than six or seven years of age,

have I gone as far as Frank’s weaving-shop, in order, with a heart

divided between curiosity and fear, to listen to his conversation with

the good people. From morning till night his tongue was going almost as

incessantly as his shuttle; and it was well known that at night, whenever

he awoke out of his sleep, the first thing he did was to put out his hand

and push them as it were off his bed.

“Go out o’ this, you thieves you--go out o’ this, now, an’ let me alone.

Nickey, is this any time to be playin’ the pipes, and me wants to sleep?

Go off, now--troth if yez do, you’ll see what I’ll give yez to-morrow.

Sure I’ll be makin’ new dressins; and if yez behave dacently, maybe I’ll

lave yez the scrapin’ o’ the pot. There now. Och! poor things, they’re

dacent crathurs. Sure they’re all gone barrin’ poor Red-cap, that doesn’t

like to lave me.” And then the harmless monomaniac would fall back into

what we trust was an innocent slumber.

About this time there was said to have occurred a very remarkable

circumstance, which gave poor Frank a vast deal of importance among the

neighbours. A man named Frank Thomas, the same in whose house Mickey

McGrory held the first dance at which I ever saw him, as detailed in a

former number of this Journal--this man, I say, had a child sick, but of

what complaint I cannot now remember, nor is it of any importance. One of

the gables of Thomas’s house was built against or rather into a Forth or

Rath called Towny, or properly Tonagh Forth. It was said to be haunted

by the fairies, and what gave it a character peculiarly wild in my eyes,

was, that there were on the southern side of it two or three little green

mounds, which were said to be the graves of unchristened children, over

which it was considered dangerous and unlucky to pass. At all events, the

season was mid-summer; and one evening about dusk, during the illness

of the child, the noise of a handsaw was heard upon the Forth. This

was considered rather strange, and after a little time, a few of those

who were assembled at Frank Thomas’s went to see who it could be that

was sawing in such a place, or what they could be sawing at so late an

hour, for every one knew that there was none in the whole country about

them who would dare to cut down the few whitethorns that grew upon the

forth. On going to examine, however, judge of their surprise, when, after

surrounding and searching the whole place, they could discover no trace

of either saw or sawyer. In fact, with the exception of themselves, there

was no one, either natural or supernatural, visible. They then returned

to the house, and had scarcely sat down, when it was heard again within

ten yards of them. Another examination of the premises took place, but

with equal success. Now, however, while standing on the forth, they heard

the sawing in a little hollow, about a hundred and fifty yards below

them, which was completely exposed to their view, but they could see

nothing. A party of them immediately went down to ascertain if possible

what this singular noise and invisible labour could mean; but on arriving

at the spot, they heard the sawing, to which were now added hammering

and driving of nails, upon the forth above, whilst those who stood on

the forth continued to hear it in the hollow. On comparing notes, they

resolved to send down to Billy Nelson’s for Frank Martin, a distance only

of about eighty or ninety yards. He was soon on the spot, and without a

moment’s hesitation solved the enigma.

“’Tis the fairies,” said he. “I see them, and busy crathurs they are.”

“But what are they sawing, Frank?”

“They are makin’ a child’s coffin,” he replied; “they have the body

already made, an’ they’re now nailin’ the lid together.”

That night the child certainly died, and the story goes, that on the

second evening afterwards, the carpenter who was called upon to make

the coffin brought a table out from Thomas’s house to the forth, as a

temporary bench; and it is said that the sawing and hammering necessary

for the completion of his task were precisely the same which had been

heard the evening but one before--neither more nor less. I remember the

death of the child myself, and the making of its coffin, but I think that

the story of the supernatural carpenter was not heard in the village for

some months after its interment.

Frank had every appearance of a hypochondriac about him. At the time

I saw him, he might be about thirty-four years of age, but I do not

think, from the debility of his frame and infirm health, that he has

been alive for several years. He was an object of considerable interest

and curiosity, and often have I been present when he was pointed out to

strangers as “the man that could see the good people.” With respect to

his solution of the supernatural noise, that is easily accounted for.

This superstition of the coffin-making is a common one, and to a man like

him, whose mind was familiar with it, the illness of the child would

naturally suggest the probability of its death, which he immediately

associated with the imagery and agents to be found in his unhappy malady.

[1] The dressings are a species of sizy flummery, which is brushed into

the yarn to keep the thread round and even, and to prevent it from being

frayed by the friction of the reed.

* * * * *

ANTIQUITY OF RAILWAYS AND GAS.--Railways were used in Northumberland

in 1633, and Lord Keeper North mentions them in 1671 in his journey to

this country. A Mr Spedding, coal-agent to Lord Lonsdale, at Whitehaven,

in 1765, had the gas from his lordship’s coal-pits conveyed by pipes

into his office, for the purpose of lighting it, and proposed to the

magistrates of Whitehaven to convey the gas by pipes through the streets

to light the town, which they refused.--_Carlisle Journal._

* * * * *

THE HUNGARIAN NOBILITY.--There is no country under heaven where nobility

is at so low a par, or rather perhaps I should say, on so unequal a

basis; and I was so much amused by the classification lately bestowed

on it by a humorous friend of mine, to whom I had frankly declared my

inability to disentangle its mazes, that I will give it in his own words.

“The nobility of Hungary are of three orders--the mighty, the moderate,

and the miserable--the Esterhazys, the Batthyanyis, and such like, are

the capital of the column--the shaft is built of the less wealthy and

influential; and the base (and a very substantial one it is) is a curious

congeries of small landholders, herdsmen, vine-growers, waggoners,

and pig-drivers. Nay, you may be unlucky enough to get a _nemes_ as a

servant; and this is the most unhappy dilemma of all, for you cannot

solace yourself by beating him when he offends you, as he is protected by

his privileges, and he appeals to the Court of the Comitat for redress.

The country is indebted to Maria Theresa for this pleasant confusion;

who, when she repaid the valour of the Hungarian soldiers with a portion

of their own land, and a name to lend it grace, forgot that many of these

individuals were probably better swordsmen than proprietors; and instead

of limiting their patent of nobility to a given term of years, laid the

foundation of a state of things as inconvenient as it is absurd.”

I was immediately reminded by his closing remark of a most ridiculous

scene, which, although in itself a mere trifle, went far to prove the

truth of his position. My readers are probably aware that none pay tolls

in Hungary save the peasants; and it chanced that on one occasion, when

we were passing from Pesth to Buda over the bridge of boats, the carriage

was detained by some accidental stoppage just beside the tollkeeper’s

lodge, when our attention was arrested by a vehement altercation between

the worthy functionary, its occupant, and a little ragged urchin of 11 or

12 years of age, who had, as it appeared, attempted to pass without the

preliminary ceremony of payment.

The tollkeeper handled the supposed delinquent with some roughness as he

demanded his fee: but the boy stood his ground stoutly, and asserted his

free right of passage as a nobleman! The belligerent party pointed to the

heel-less shoes and ragged jerkin of the culprit, and smiled in scorn.

The lad for all reply bade him remove his hand from his collar, and let

him pass at his peril; and the tone was so assured in which he did so,

that the tollkeeper became grave, and looked somewhat doubtful; when

just at the moment up walked a sturdy peasant, who, while he paid his

kreutzer, saluted the young nobleman, and settled the point.

It was really broad farce. The respectably clad and comfortable looking

functionary loosed his hold in a moment, and the offending hand, as it

released the collar of the captive, lifted his hat, while he poured

out his excuses for an over-zeal, arising from his ignorance of the

personal identity of this young scion of an illustrious house, who

was magnanimously pleased to accept the apology, and to raise his own

dilapidated cap in testimony of his greatness of soul, as he walked away

in triumph. Cruikshank would have had food for a _chef d’œuvre_.--_Miss

Pardoe’s Hungary._

* * * * *

AFRICAN ADMINISTRATION OF JUSTICE.--On coming out of my hut at Fandah

one morning, I saw the king seated at the gate of his palace, surrounded

by his great men, administering justice. At a little distance, on the

grass, were two men and two women, who were charged with robbery. The

evidence had already been gone through before my arrival. The king was

the principal speaker, and when he paused, the whole court murmured

approbation. The younger woman made a long defence, and quite astonished

me by her volubility, variety of intonation, and graceful action. The

appeal, however, seemed to be in vain; for when she had finished, the

king, who had listened with great patience, passed sentence in a speech

of considerable length, delivered with great fluency and emphasis. In

many parts he was much applauded, except by the poor wretches, who heard

their doom with shrieks of despair. The king then retired, the court

broke up, and the people dispersed. None remained but the prisoners and a

decrepit old man, who, with many threats and some ceremony, administered

a small bowl of poison, prepared, I believe, from the leaves of a

venerable tree in the neighbourhood, which was hooped and propped all

round. The poor creatures received the potion on their knees, and before

they could be induced to swallow it, cast many a lingering look and last

farewell on the beautiful world from which a small draught was about to

separate them. They afterwards drank a prodigious quantity of water; and

when I next went out, the dose had done its deadly work. I cannot tell

how far justice was truly administered, but there was a great appearance

of it; and I must say that I never in any court saw a greater display of

decorum and dignity.--_Allan’s Views on the Niger._

* * * * *

THE PLANING-MACHINE ROOM IN MESSRS FAWCETT AND CO.’S ENGINE FACTORY,

LIVERPOOL.--In this room are valuable and elaborately contrived machines

for the planing or levelling of large plates, or other pieces of iron

or brass, so as to give them a smooth, true, and polished surface. The

article or piece to be planed is securely fixed by screw-bolts, &c. to

a horizontal iron table, perforated with holes for the insertion of the

bolts from beneath it in any required point, to suit the size or form

of the article. This table, when put in motion, travels backwards and

forwards with its load on two iron rails, or parallel slides. Over the

centre is perpendicularly fixed what is called the “planing tool,” an

instrument made of steel, somewhat in the form of a hook, with the point

so inclined as to present itself towards the surface of the metal to be

planed, as it approaches it on the table, so as, when all is adjusted,

to plough or plane it in narrow streaks or shavings as it passes under

it. The extremity of the tool is about half an inch to three quarters

in breadth, and being of a round form at the under side, and ground or

bevelled on the upper, presents a sort of point. If a plate of iron is to

be planed, the operation commences on the outer edge, and each movement

backwards and forwards of the table places it in such a position under

the tool, that another small parallel cut is made throughout its whole

length. The tool, in ordinary machines of this kind, is fixed so that

it cuts only in one direction, as the plate is drawn against its edge

or point, which is raised to allow of the backward motion of the plate.

A new patent has however been obtained for a great improvement in this

respect by Mr Whitworth, of Manchester, and several of his machines are

on Messrs Fawcett and Co.’s premises. In these, by a peculiarly beautiful

contrivance, the cutting instrument, the moment the plate passes under

it, “jumps” up a little in the box or case to which it is attached, and

instantly “turns about” in the opposite direction, and commences cutting

away, so that both backwards and forwards the operation goes on without

loss of time. The workmen very quaintly and appropriately call this new

planing tool “Jim Crow.” A workman attends to each of the machines; and

when the piece to be cut is fixed with great exactness on the moving

table by a spirit-level, he has nothing to do but to watch that it remain

so, and that the machinery work evenly and correctly. Where a very

smooth surface is required, the operation of planing is repeated, and

two plates thus finished will be so truly level, that they will adhere

together. It should be added, that so perfect are these machines, that

in addition to planing horizontally, they may be so adjusted as to plane

perpendicularly, or at any given angle.

* * * * *

The planet revolves for ever in its appointed orbit; and the noblest

triumph of mechanical philosophy is to have ascertained that the

perturbations of its course are all compensated within determined

periods, and its movement exempted from decay. But man, weak and erring

though he be, is still progressive in his moral nature. He does not move

round for ever in one unvarying path of moral action. The combinations of

his history exhibit not only the unity of the material system, but also

the continually advancing improvement belonging to beings of a higher

order.--_Miller’s “Modern History philosophically considered.”_

* * * * *

TO PREVENT HORSES’ FEET FROM CLOGGING UP WITH SNOW.--One pound of lard,

half a pound of tar, and two ounces of resin, simmered up together. Stop

the horses’ feet, just before starting, with this, which will prevent the

feet from balling.--_Suffolk Chronicle._

* * * * *

Conscience is merely our own judgment of the moral rectitude or turpitude

of our own actions.--_Locke._

* * * * *

Printed and published every Saturday by GUNN and CAMERON, at the

Office of the General Advertiser, No. 6, Church Lane, College

Green, Dublin--Agents:--R. GROOMBRIDGE, Panyer Alley, Paternoster

Row, London; SIMMS and DINHAM, Exchange Street, Manchester;

C. DAVIES, North John Street, Liverpool; SLOCOMBE & SIMMS,

Leeds, FRASER and CRAWFORD, George Street, Edinburgh; and DAVID

ROBERTSON, Trongate, Glasgow.

The Irish Penny Journal, Vol. 1 No. 34, February 20, 1841 · 第 9 / 9 题