That in the Year 1747, that part of Nottingham which lyes within this

Government and part of the Town of Groton Called Joint Grass preferred

two petitions to this Great and Hon'ble: Court praying that they might

be Annexed to the Town of Dunstable which petitions Your Excellency and

Honours were pleased to Grant upon Conditions that a meeting house for

the Publick Worship of God should be built two hundred and forty Eight

Rods 52 Deg's: West of the North from North East Corner of M. John Tyngs

land But the Inhabitants of the Town Apprehending Your Excellency and

Honours were not fully Acquainted with the Inconveniencys that would

Attend placeing the Meeting House there Soon after Convened in Publick

Town Meeting Legally Called to Conclude upon a place for fixing said

meeting house where it would best Accommodate all the Inhabitants at

which meeting proposals were made by some of the Inhabitants to take the

Advice and Assistance of three men of other Towns which proposal was

Accepted by the Town and they accordingly made Choice of The Hon'ble:

James Minot Esq'r. Maj'r: Lawrence and M'r. Brewer and then Adjourned

the Meeting.

That the said Gentlemen mett at the Towns Request and Determined upon a

place for fixing the said meeting house which was approved of by the

Town and they Accordingly Voted to Raise the sum of one hundred pounds

towards defraying the Charge of Building the said House But Upon

Reviewing the Spot pitched upon as aforesaid many of the Inhabitants

Apprehended it was more to the southward than the Committee Intended it

should be And thereupon a Meeting was Called on the Twenty Sixth day of

May last when the Town voted to Build the meeting house on the East side

of the Road that leads from Cap't: Cummings's to M'r Simon Tompsons

where some part of the Timber now lyes being about Forty Rods Northward

of Isaac Colburns house which they Apprehended to be the Spot of Ground

the Committee Intended to fix upon.

And for as much as the place Last Voted by the Town to Build their

meeting house upon will best Accommodate all the Inhabitants,

Your pet'rs. therefore most humbly pray Your Excellency and Honours

would be pleased to Confirm the said Vote of the Town of the 26'th: day

of May last and order the meeting house for the Publick Worship of God

to be Erected on the peice of Ground aforementioned,

And in duty bound they will ever pray &c.

Simon tompson

Eben Parkhurst

Com'tee for the

Town of Dunstable

[Massachusetts Archives, cxv, 507, 508.]

The Committee appointed on the Petition of a Committee for the Town of

_Dunstable,_ reported according to Order.

Read and accepted, and thereupon the following Order pass'd, _viz._ _In

as much as the House for the publick Worship of_ _GOD in_ Dunstable _was

not erected within the Line limitted in the Order of this Court of_ June

6th 1747, _the Inhabitants of_ Groton _and_ Nottingham _have lost the

Benefit of Incorporation with the Town of_ Dunstable: Therefore

_Voted_, That a Meeting House for the publick Worship of GOD be

erected as soon as may be on the East Side of the Road that leads from

Capt. _Cummins_ to _Simon Thompson's,_ where the Timber for

such a House now lies, agreeable to a Vote of the said Town of

_Dunstable_ on the 26th of _May_ last; and that the said Inhabitants

of _Groton_ and _Nottingham_ be and continue to be set off and

annexed to the Town of _Dunstable_, to do Duty and receive

Priviledge there, their Neglect of Compliance with the said Order of

_June_ 6th 1747, notwithstanding, unless the major Part of the

Inhabitants and rateable Estate belonging to said _Groton_ and

_Nottingham_ respectively, shall on or before the first Day of

_September_ next in writing under their Hands, transmit to the

Secretary's Office their Desire not to continue so incorporated with the

town of _Dunstable_ as aforesaid; provided also, That in Case the

said Inhabitants of _Groton_ and _Nottingham_ shall signify

such their Desire in Manner and Time as aforesaid, they be nevertheless

subjected to pay and discharge their Proportion of all Publick Town or

Ministerial Rates or Taxes hitherto granted or regularly laid on them;

excepting the last Sum granted for building a Meeting House. And that

the present Town Officers stand and execute their Offices respectively

until the Anniversary Town-Meeting at _Dunstable_ in _March_

next. Sent up for Concurrence.

[Journal of the House of Representatives (pages 46, 47), June 26, 1749.]

Whereas the Great & Generall Court of the the [_sic_] Province of

the Massachusetts Bay in June Last, On the Petitions of Dunstable &

Nottingham has Ordered that the Inhabitants of Groton and Nottingham,

Which by Order of the s'd Court the 6th of June 1747 Were On Certain

Conditions Annexed to s'd Dunstable & (Which Conditions not being

Complyed with) be Annexed to s'd. Dunstable to do duty & Receive

priviledge there their neglect of Complyance notwithstanding, Unless the

major part of the Inhabitants and ratable Estate belonging to the s'd.

Groton & Nottingham respectively Shall on or before the first day of

September next in Writing under their hands Transmitt to the Secretarys

Office their desire not to Continue so Incorporated With the town of

Dunstable as afores'd. Now therefore Wee the Subscribers Inhabitants of

Groton & Nottingham Sett of as afores'd. do hereby Signifie Our desire

not to Continue so Incorporated with the town of Dunstable as afores'd.

but to be Sett at Liberty As tho that Order of Court had not ben passed

Dated the 10th day of July 1749

Inhabitants of Groton

Timothy Read

Joseph fletcher

John Swallow

Samuel Comings

Benjamin Robbins

Joseph Spalding iuner

Inhabitants of Nottingham

Samuell Gould

Robert Fletcher

Joseph perriaham Daken [Deacon?]

iohn Collans

Zacheus Spaulding

and ten others

[Massachusetts Archives, cxv, 515.]

A manuscript plan of Dunstable, made by Joseph Blanchard, in the autumn

of 1748, and accompanying these papers among the Archives (cxv, 519),

has considerable interest for the local antiquary.

In the course of a few years some of these Groton signers reconsidered

the matter, and changed their minds. It appears from the following

communication that the question of the site of the meeting-house had

some influence in the matter:--

Groton, May 10, 1753. We have concluded to Joine with Dunstable in

settling the gospell and all other affairs hart & hand in case Dunstable

woud meet us in erecting a meting house in center of Lands or center of

Travel.

Joseph Spaulding jr.

John Swallow.

Timothy Read.

Samuel Cumings.

Joseph Parkhurst.

[Nason's History of Dunstable, page 85.]

The desired result of annexation was now brought about, and in this way

Joint Grass became a part and portion of Dunstable. The following

extracts give further particulars in regard to it:--

A Petition of a Committee in Behalf of the Inhabitants of

_Dunstable_, within this Province, shewing, that that Part of

_Dunstable_ by the late running of the Line is small, and the Land

much broken, unable to support the Ministry, and other necessary

Charges; that there is a small Part of _Groton_ contiguous, and

well situated to be united to them in the same Incorporation, lying to

the West and Northwest of them; that in the Year 1744, the Inhabitants

there requested them that they might be incorporated with them, which

was conceeded to by the Town of _Groton_; that in Consequence of

this, upon Application to this Court they were annexed to the Town of

_Dunstable_ with the following Proviso, viz. "That within one Year

from that Time a House for the publick Worship of GOD should be erected

at a certain Place therein mentioned": Which Place was esteemed by all

Parties both in _Groton_ and _Nottingham_, so incommodious,

that it was not complied withal; that on a further Application to this

Court to alter the Place, Liberty was given to the Inhabitants of

_Groton_ and _Nottingham_, to withdraw, whereby they are deprived of

that contiguous and necessary Assistance which they expected: Now as the

Reasons hold good in every Respect for their Incorporation with them,

they humbly pray that the said Inhabitants of _Groton_ by the same Bounds

as in the former Order stated, may be reannexed to them, for the Reasons

mentioned.

Read and _Ordered_, That the Petitioners serve the Inhabitants of

_Groton_ therein refer'd to, as also the Clerk of the Town of

_Groton_, with Copies of this Petition, that so the said Inhabitants,

as also the Town of _Groton_, shew Cause, if any they have, on the

first Tuesday of the next _May_ Session, why the Prayer thereof

should not be granted.

Sent up for Concurrence.

[Journal of the House of Representatives (pages 138, 139), April 4,

1753.]

_John Hill_, Esq; brought down the Petition of a Committee of the Town

of _Dunstable_, as entred the 4th of _April_ last, and refer'd. Pass'd

in Council, viz. In Council _June_ 5th 1753. Read again, together with

the Answer of the Inhabitants of that Part of _Groton_ commonly called

_Joint-Grass,_ and likewise _William Lawrence_, Esq; being heard in

Behalf of the Town of _Groton_, and the Matter being fully considered,

_Ordered_, That the Prayer of the Petition be so far granted, as that

_Joseph Fletcher, Joseph Spaulding, Samuel Comings, Benjamin Rabbins,

Timothy Read, John Swallow, Joseph Parkhurst_, and _Ebenezer Parkhurst_,

Jun. with their Families and Estates, and other Lands petitioned for, be

set off from the Town of _Groton_, and annexed to the town of

_Dunstable_, agreable to the Vote of the Town of _Groton_ on the 18th of

_May_ 1747, to receive Priviledge and do Duty there, provided that

_Timothy Read_, Constable for the Town of _Groton_, and Collector of the

said Parish in said Town the last Year, and _Joseph Fletcher_, Constable

for the said Town this present Year, finish their Collection of the

Taxes committed or to be committed to them respectively; and also that

the said Inhabitants pay their Proportion of the Taxes that are already

due or shall be due to the said Town of _Groton_ for the present Year,

for which they may be taxed by the Assessors of _Groton_, as tho' this

Order had not past: provided also that the Meeting-House for the publick

Worship of GOD in _Dunstable_ be erected agreable to the Vote of

_Dunstable_ relating thereto in _May_ 1753. Sent down for Concurrence.

Read and concur'd.

[Journal of the House of Representatives (page 21), June 7, 1753.]

The part of Nottingham, mentioned in these petitions, was not joined to

Dunstable until a later period. On June 14, 1754, an order passed the

House of Representatives, annexing "a very small Part of Nottingham now

lying in this Province, unable to be made into a District, but very

commodious for Dunstable;" but the matter was delayed in the Council,

and it was a year or two before the end was brought about.

The west parish of Groton was set off as a precinct on November 26,

1742. It comprised that part of the town lying on the west side of the

Nashua River, north of the road from Groton to Townsend. Its

incorporation as a parish or precinct allowed the inhabitants to manage

their own ecclesiastical affairs, while in all other matters they

continued to act with the parent town. Its partial separation gave them

the benefit of a settled minister in their neighborhood, which, in those

days, was considered of great importance.

It is an interesting fact to note that, in early times, the main reason

given in the petitions for dividing towns was the long distance to the

meeting-house, by which the inhabitants were prevented from hearing the

stated preaching of the gospel.

The petitioners for the change first asked for a township, which was not

granted; but subsequently they changed their request to a precinct

instead, which was duly allowed. The papers relating to the matter are

as follows:--

Province of The Massechuetts Bay in New England.

To His Excellency W'm: Shirley Esq'r: Goveinr in & over y'e Same And To

The Hon'le: his Majestis Council & House of Representetives in Gen'll:

Court Assembled June 1742:

The Petition of Sundry Inhabitants & Resendant in the Northerly Part of

Groton Humbly Sheweth that the Town of Groton is at Least ten miles in

Length North & South & seven miles in wedth East & West And that in

Runing two miles Due North from the Present Meeting House & from thence

to Run Due East to Dunstable West Line. And from the Ende of the S'd:

two miles to Run West till it Comes to the Cuntry Rode that is Laide out

to Townshend & soon S'd: Rode till it Comes to Townshend East Line then

tur[n]ing & Runing Northly to Nestiquaset Corner which is for Groton &

Townshend then tur[n]ing & Runing Easterly on Dunstable South Line & So

on Dunstable Line till it comes to the Line first mentioned, Which Land

Lyeth about Seven miles in Length & four miles & a Quarter in Wedth.

And Thare is Now Setled in those Lines here after mentioned is about the

Number of Seventy families all Redy And may [many?] more ready to Settle

there and as soon as scet off to the Petitioners & those families

Settled in y'e Lines afore s'd: Would make A Good township & the

Remaining Part of Groton Left in a regular forme And by reason of the

great Distance your Petitioners are from the Present Meeting House are

put to very Great Disadvantages in Attending the Public Worship of God

many of Whom are Oblidged to travel Seven or Eight miles & that the

Remaining Part of Groton Consisting of such good land & y'e

Inhabitants so Numerous that thay Can by no means be Hurt Should your

Petitioners & those families Settled in y'e Lines afore s'd: Be

Erected to a Seprate & Distinct Township: That the in Contestable

situation & accomodations on the s'd: Lands was y'e one great reason

of your Petitioners Settling thare & Had Not those Prospects been so

Clear to us We should by no means have under taken The Hardship We have

already & must go Throu.

Wherefore Your Petitioners Would farther Shew that Part of y'e Land here

Prayed for all Redy Voted of by the S'd town to be a Presinct & that the

most of them that are in that Lines have Subscribed with us to be a

Dest[i]ncte Township Wherefore Your Petitioners Humbly Pray your Honnors

to Grante us our Desire according to This our Request as we in Duty

Bound Shall Ever Pray &c.

Joseph Spaulding iur

Zachariah Lawrance

William Allen

Jeremiah Lawrance

William Blood

Nathaniel Parker

Enoch Lawarnce

Samuel Right

James larwance

Josiah Tucker

Sam'll fisk

Soloman blood

John Woods

Josiah Sartell

benj'n. Swallow

Elies Ellat

Richard Worner

Ebenezer Gillson

Ebenezer Parce

James Blood iu

Joseph Spaulding

Phiniahas Parker iur

Joseph Warner

Phineahas Chambrlin

Isaac laken

Isacc Williams

John Swallow

Joseph Swallow

Benj'n: Robins

Nathan Fisk

John Chamberlin

Jacob Lakin

Seth Phillips

John Cumings

Benj'n: Parker

Gersham Hobart

Joseph Lawrance

John Spaulding

Isaac Woods

In the House of Rep'ives June. 10, 1742.

Read and Ordered that the Pet'rs serve the Town of Groton with a Copy of

this Pet'n that they shew cause if any they have on the first fryday of

the next session of this Court why the Prayer thereof should not be

granted

Sent up for concurrence

T Cushing Spkr

In Council June 15. 1742;

Read & Non Concur'd

J Willard Sec'ry

[Massachusetts Archives, cxiv, 779, 780.]

To his Excellency William Shirley Esq'r. Captain General and Governour

in Cheiff in and over his Majesties Province of y'e. Massachusetts Bay

in New England: To y'e. Honourable his Majesties Council and House of

Representatives in General Court Assembled on y'e: Twenty sixth Day of

May. A:D. 1742.

The Petition of as the Subscribers to your Excellency and Honours

Humbley Sheweth that we are Proprietors and Inhabitants of y'e. Land

Lying on y'e. Westerly Side Lancester River (so called) [now known as

the Nashua River] in y'e North west corner of y'e. Township of

Groton: & Such of us as are Inhabitants thereon Live very Remote from ye

Publick worship of God in s'd Town and at many Times and Season of

y'e. year are Put to Great Difficulty to attend y'e. same: And the

Lands Bounded as Followeth (viz) Southerly on Townshend Rode: Westerly

on Townshend Line: Northerly on Dunstable West Precint, & old Town: and

Easterly on said River as it now Runs to y'e. First mentioned Bounds,

being of y'e. Contents of about Four Miles Square of Good Land, well

Scituated for a Precint: And the Town of Groton hath been Petitioned to

Set of y'e. Lands bounded as afores'd. to be a Distinct and Seperate

Precint and at a Town Meeting of y'e. Inhabitants of s'd. Town of

Groton Assembled on y'e Twenty Fifth Day of May Last Past The Town

voted y'e Prayer of y'e. s'd. Petition and that y'e Lands before

Described should be a Separate Precinct and that y'e. Inhabitants

thereon and Such others as hereafter Shall Settle on s'd. Lands;

should have y'e Powers and Priviledges that other Precincts in s'd.

Province have or Do Enjoy: as p'r. a Coppy from Groton Town Book

herewith Exhibited may Appear: For the Reasons mentioned we the

Subscribers as afores'd. Humbley Prayes your Excellency and Honours to

Set off y'e s'd Lands bounded as afores'd. to be a Distinct and

Sepperate Precinct and Invest y'e Inhabitants thereon (Containing

about y'e N'o. of Forty Famelies) and Such others as Shall hereafter

Settle on s'd. Lands with Such Powers & Priviledges as other Precincts

in s'd. Province have &c or Grant to your Petitioners Such other

Releaf in y'e. Premises as your Excellency and Honours in your Great

Wisdom Shall think Fit: and your Petitioners as in Duty bound Shall Ever

pray &c.

Benj Swallow

W'm: Spalden

Isaac Williams

Ebenezer Gilson

Elias Ellit

Samuel Shattuck iu

James Shattuck

David Shattuck

David Blood

Jonathan Woods

John Blood iuner

Josiah Parker

Jacob Ames

Jonas Varnum

Moses Woods

Zachery Lawrence Jun'r

Jeremiah Lawrence

John Mozier

Josiah Tucher

W'm Allen

John Shadd

Jam's. Green

John Kemp

Nehemiah Jewett

Eleazar Green

Jonathan Shattuck

Jonathan Shattuck Jun'r

In the House of Rep'tives Nov'r. 26. 1742

In Answer to the within Petition ordered that that Part of the Town of

Groton Lying on the Westerly Side of Lancaster River within the

following bounds viz't bounding Easterly on said River Southerly on

Townsend Road so called Wisterly on Townsend line and Northerly on

Dunstable West Precinct with the Inhabitants thereon be and hereby are

Set off a distinct and seperate precinct and Vested with the powers &

priviledges which Other Precincts do or by Law ought to enjoy Always

provided that the Inhabitants Dwelling on the Lands abovementioned be

subject to pay their Just part and proportions of all ministeriall Rates

and Taxes in the Town of Groton already Granted or Assessed.

Sent up for Concurrence.

T Cushing Spk'r.

In Council Nov'r. 26 1742 Read and Concurr'd

J Willard Secry

Consented to, W Shirley,

[Massachusetts Archives, cxiv, 768, 769.]

When the new Provincial line was run between Massachusetts and New

Hampshire, in the spring of 1741, it left a gore of land, previously

belonging to the west parish of Dunstable, lying north of the territory

of Groton and contiguous to it. It formed a narrow strip, perhaps three

hundred rods in width at the western end, running easterly for three

miles and tapering off to a point at the Nashua River, by which stream

it was entirely separated from Dunstable. Shaped like a thin wedge, it

lay along the border of the province, and belonged geographically to the

west precinct or parish of Groton. Under these circumstances the second

parish petitioned the General Court to have it annexed to their

jurisdiction, which request was granted. William Prescott, one of the

committee appointed to take charge of the matter, nearly a quarter of a

century later was the commander of the American forces at the battle of

Bunker Hill. It has been incorrectly stated by writers that this

triangular parcel of land was the gore ceded, in the summer of 1736, to

the proprietors of Groton, on the petition of Benjamin Prescott. The

documents relating to this matter are as follows:--

To his Honnor Spencer Phipes Esq'r Cap't Geniorl and Commander In Cheaf

in and ouer his majists prouince of the Massachusets Bay in New england

and to The Hon'ble his majestys Counsel and House of Representatiues In

Geniral Courte assambled at Boston The 26 of December 1751

The Petition of Peleg Lawrance Jarimah Lawrance and william Prescott a

Cum'ttee. for the Second Parish In Groton in The County of Middle sikes.

Humbly Shew That Theare is a strip of Land of about fiue or six hundred

acors Lys ajoyning To The Town of Groton which be Longs To the town of

Dunstable the said strip of land Lys near fouer mill in Length and

bounds on the North Line of the said second Parrish in Groton and on the

South Side of Newhampsher Line which Peeace by Runing the sd Line of

Newhampsher was Intierly Cut off from the town of Dunstable from

Receueing any Priuelidge their for it Lys not Less then aboute Eight

mill from the Senter of the town of Dunstable and but about two mill and

a half from the meeting house in the said second Parish in Groton so

that they that settel on the sd Strip of Land may be much beter

acommadated to be Joyned to ye town of Groton and to the sd second

Parish than Euer thay Can any other way in this Prouince and the town of

Dunstable being well sencable thare of haue at thare town meeting on the

19 Day of December Currant voted of the sd Strip of Land allso Jarnes

Colburn who now Liues on sd Strip Land from the town of Dunstable to be

annexed to the town of Groton and to the sd second Parish in sd town and

the second Parish haue aCordingly voted to Recue the same all which may

appear by the vote of sd Dunstable and said Parish which will be of

Grate advantige to the owners of the sd. strip of Land and a benefit to

the said second Parish in Groton so that your Petitioners Humbly Pray

that the sd. strip of Land may be annexed to the said second Parish in

Groton so far as Groton Nor west corner to do Duty and Recue Priulidge

theare and your petionrs In Duty bound shall Euer Pray

Peleg Lawrence

Will'm Prescott

Jeremiah Lawrence

Dunstable December 24 1751

this may Certifye the Grate and Genirol Courte that I Liue on the slip

of Land within mentioned and it tis my Desier that the prayer of this

Petition be Granted

James Colburn

In the House of Rep'tives Jan'ry 4. 1752

Voted that the prayer of the Petition be so farr granted that the said

strip of Land prayed for, that is the Jurisdiction of it be Annex'd to

the Town of Groton & to y'e Second Precinct in said Town & to do dutys

there & to recieve Priviledges from them.

Sent up for Concurrence

T. Hubbard Spk'r.

In Council Jan'y 6. 1752 Read & Concur'd

J Willard Secry.

Consented to

S Phips

[Massachusetts Archives, cxvi, 162, 163.]

The west parish of Groton was made a district on April 12, 1753, the day

the Act was signed by the Governor, which was a second step toward its

final and complete separation. It then took the name of Pepperell, and

was vested with still broader political powers. It was so called after

Sir William Pepperrell, who had successfully commanded the New England

troops against Louisburg; and the name was suggested, doubtless, by the

Reverend Joseph Emerson, the first settled minister of the parish. He

had accompanied that famous expedition in the capacity of chaplain, only

the year before he had received a call for his settlement, and his

associations with the commander were fresh in his memory. It will be

noticed that the Act for incorporating the district leaves the name

blank, which was customary in this kind of legislation at that period;

and the governor, perhaps with the advice of his council, was in the

habit subsequently of filling out the name.

Pepperell, for one "r" is dropped from the name, had now all the

privileges of a town, except the right to choose a representative to the

General Court, and this political connection with Groton was kept up

until the beginning of the Revolution. In the session of the General

Court which met at Watertown, on July 19, 1775, Pepperell was

represented by a member, and in this way acquired the privileges of a

town without any special act of incorporation. Other similar districts

were likewise represented, in accordance with the precept calling that

body together, and they thus obtained municipal rights without the usual

formality. The precedent seems to have been set by the Provincial

Congress of Massachusetts, which was made up of delegates from the

districts as well as from the towns. It was a revolutionary step taken

outside of the law. On March 23, 1786, this anomalous condition of

affairs was settled by an act of the Legislature, which declared all

districts, incorporated before January 1, 1777, to be towns for all

intents and purposes.

The act for the incorporation of Pepperell is as follows:--

Anno Regni Regis Georgij Secundi vicesimo Sexto

An Act for Erecting the second Precinct in the Town of Groton into a

seperate District

The Bay State Monthly — Volume 2, No. 1, October, 1884 · 第 2 / 8 段