PREFACE TO EDITION OF 1911.

I have read over carefully these translations with a view to another

reprint, which the publishers find necessary, but I have not compared

them again with the texts used. I have corrected a few typographical

errors of little importance.

For the bibliography I would refer to Brandl's _Sonderausgabe aus der

zweiten Auflage von Paul's Grundriss der germanischen Philologie_

(Strassburg, 1908), in which I find noted Holthausen's edition of the

ELENE (Heidelberg, 1905), but I have not seen it.

I take advantage of this opportunity to say that my translation of

BÉOWULF, of which the last reprint was issued in 1910, is not in

_prose_, as some have misconceived it, but it is in the same metrical

form as the translations in the present volume,--an accentual metre in

rough imitation of the original. I agree with Professor Gummere and

others that this is a better form for the translation of Old English

poetry than plain prose. It was approved by the late Professor Child

nearly _thirty_ years ago, as noted in the Preface to the second edition

of my translation of BÉOWULF, January, 1885.

Elene; Judith; Athelstan, or the Fight at Brunanburh; Byrhtnoth, or the Fight at Maldon; and the Dream of the Rood Anglo-Saxon Poems · 第 28 / 59 题