Was Mackenzie a "Martinet"

Mackenzie was not a West Point "martinet", as that term is generally

understood in our Army--but, from four wounds he had received, three in

the Civil War, and one that year in the campaign against Quan-ah Parker,

the Una-ha-da Comanche Chief--and almost criminal neglect of his own

health, in his intensity of nature and purpose in prosecuting these

arduous Indian campaigns--he had become more or less irritable,

irascible, exacting--sometimes erratic, and frequently explosive--

This much may be said, however, it is certain that notwithstanding

his physical condition, and his mental temperament resulting therefrom,

he never sought to inflict an injury or punishment upon anybody

unnecessarily--never became a petty or malicious persecutor, hounding

a man into his grave--and when it became evident to him as well as to

others that he had done any of his officers or men an act of injustice,

nobody could have been more open, free and frank in his disavowal of

that act, or quicker to apologize and render all the reparation possible

in his power-- This applied to any and all down to the last Second

Lieutenant and private soldier in the regiment--

One man never knows another so well, even intimately--as when he is

thrown closely in contact with or lives and sleeps and eats with him--

The writer had done all with Mackenzie during a greater part of this

period of 1871--having been his Post Adjutant twice--during Gen.

Sherman's inspection in May, at the time of the massacre of Salt Creek

Prairie, and prior to our Expedition of that year, and his Field

Adjutant on his entire campaign in his abortive attempt to strike

Kicking Bird's band of Ki-o-was before he could be stampeded into the

Fort Sill Reservation--from May 1st until Oct. 3--I had got to know

him very well--

On the Trail of Deserters; A Phenomenal Capture · 第 2 / 21 题