The church Consistory in charge of Bach's position were justly

indignant at his unduly protracted absence and called him to account.

After his extremely promising beginning, people had grown more and

more dissatisfied with the manner in which he discharged his duties

as organist. He was reproached with making his accompaniment for the

congregational singing so intricate and irregular that the singers often

completely lost the melody. Moreover, he at first made his preludes

immoderately long, and, when given a hint of this by the officiating

clergyman, he immediately fell into the opposite extreme, and cut them

much too short. It was also said that he had neglected the training

of his pupil-choir and was unable to exercise proper control over the

same. These complaints were certainly not unfounded; they accord with

Bach's artistic development and with his character. When he sat before

the organ, inspired by musical thoughts in rich profusion, he could not

have been the genius that he was, if he did not sometimes forget that

he must adapt himself to the comprehension of the congregation and the

arrangement of the service. That, after the exhortation to restraint, he

at once offered preludes of the most striking brevity, is an instance of

that defiant spirit which was one of his strongly marked characteristics.

The pupil-choir, after a time, began to seem insignificant in his eyes,

and the exercises with them monotonous. Considering his youth and the

irritability of his temperament, it is not surprising that he failed to

retain the respect of this band of untrained youths. Notwithstanding

their reproaches, the members of the Consistory showed themselves, on the

whole, sufficiently lenient, and allowed nearly a year to pass before

making further remonstrances, though he continued, in the interval, to

act as he pleased. Bach was no longer contented in Arnstadt, where, after

all, though perfectly capable of standing in the first rank, he filled a

position of secondary importance. It is credibly related, that favorable

offers were made him at this time, from many different places, and on

the 29th of June, 1707, he resigned his office in Arnstadt to accept an

appointment as organist at Mühlhausen, in Thuringia.

The Bachs, as a family, were accustomed to marry early in life. Among

the criticisms upon Sebastian's conduct made by the clergy of Arnstadt,

there was one to the effect that he had accompanied upon his organ,

the singing of a "strange maiden." This, however, could not well have

happened during the service, as female singers in that day were still

excluded from church music. The "maiden" was probably his cousin, Maria

Barbara Bach, daughter of Michael Bach, who might have been betrothed

to him at that time, since he married her on the 17th of October, 1707.

Four of the seven children of this marriage, three sons and a daughter,

reached maturity, and two of these sons, Wilhelm Friedemann, and Carl

Philipp Emanuel, born in 1710 and 1714 respectively, are well known to

have attained great musical renown.

In Mühlhausen there were two principal churches, the Blasius and the

Church of St Mary. The former, to which Bach was attached, took the

highest rank, its organist constituting the chief musical dignitary of

the city, and a certain additional lustre was shed upon the position,

through the fact that it had been filled by a number of brilliant

musicians. Among these were Joachim Moller, styled von Burck (1541-1610),

Johann Rudolf Ahle (1625-1673) and Johann Georg Ahle (1673-1706). The

prominent composer, Johann Eccard, a contemporary and friend of Moller,

was also a native of Mühlhausen. Bach recognized the honor conferred upon

him by the call, and it spurred him on to more important achievements.

In addition to his unwearied efforts to advance himself in the line of

his special branch of art, he zealously strove to elevate the standard

of vocal music in the churches of Mühlhausen, and procured at his own

expense a fine collection of the best church music, which was produced

by him from time to time. He caused the organ of the Blasiuskirche to

be repaired after a plan of his own, which bore witness to his great

practical knowledge, and also attached to it a _Glockenspiel_, or

peal of bells. He moreover composed several great pieces of church

music for chorus, solo voices, organ and other instruments. One of

these was performed on the 4th of February, 1708, at the time of the

so-called Changing of the Council, an annual ceremony which consisted

in transferring the administration of one of the three branches of the

municipal government to another. A second beautiful work of the same

order was founded on the words of the 130th psalm. But from various

causes Bach soon found his activity held in check. His grand and lofty

compositions, which surprised by their novelty, presented a striking

contrast to the light and pleasing style of the later Mühlhausen

masters. The inhabitants of the free and ancient imperial city were

possessed of a strongly developed local pride, extending far beyond

its proper limits. Affecting superiority, they were disposed to hold

themselves aloof from strangers, and that a youth of twenty-two, treading

in the footsteps of their once highly respected fellow-citizens, should

manifest such independence and love of innovation, aroused their

antagonism. These difficulties, however, were not insuperable; Bach,

on his side, was not wanting in friends, and the Council gave abundant

proof of its good-will. But other and more radical differences existed,

which could not be so easily put aside. Philipp Jakob Spener had recently

started a movement in the Lutheran Church, which, after the publication

of his book, entitled "Pia Desideria," received the name of pietism,

and this movement had spread to Mühlhausen. The first clergyman of the

town and leading preacher at the Blasiuskirche, J. A. Frohne, was an

ardent advocate of the principles and measures of Spener, which owed

their origin to the unsatisfactory status of the Lutheran clergy. This

body adhered obstinately to the forms which Luther had given it, while

departing all too widely from the spirit of the Protestant reformer. The

pietism of Spener, in the first decades of its existence, had brought

abundant blessing into the domain of spiritual and intellectual life,

while his opponents, who were styled orthodox, presented a sad picture of

moral torpor and arrogant narrow-mindedness. Unfortunately, the pietists

became by degrees very strongly tinctured with asceticism, which had the

effect of lessening their influence upon the popular heart, and rendering

impossible the genuine success of their cause. As a class, they conceived

of the earthly life only in the light of a contrast to the heavenly

one, which they dreamed of leading in a state of blessed communion with

God. Everything which did not directly promote this rapt, contemplative

condition they felt bound to reject, and in this way soon became hostile

to the arts, which the orthodox highly valued and encouraged, after the

example of Luther. Music seemed to the pietists seductive, unless made

to serve an edificatory purpose, and even then it could be employed only

for the accentuation of simple religious songs. These, at any rate, were

the views which Frohne now sought to establish; it was only natural

that Bach, whose genius was just beginning to spread its mighty wings,

whose highest aim was to introduce a lofty type of ecclesiastical music,

embracing everything the age had produced in the shape of artistic

forms and devices, should lift up his voice in protest at such a time.

If ever in his life he had been characterized by a yielding and pliant

disposition, it was not to be expected that he should manifest it now,

when his life-work was in question. We must therefore regard it as the

voice of destiny which, after the lapse of a single year, called him to

fill the post of organist at the ducal court of Weimar, one of the places

he had formerly visited in making a concert tour. He did not hesitate to

obey the call, though realizing to the full the extent of his obligation

to the friendly and appreciative Council of the city of Mühlhausen.

These men were well aware of the magnitude of their loss and consented

most unwillingly to his release, after imposing the condition that he

should continue to superintend from Weimar the organ repairs which he had

commenced.

[Illustration: MORNING PRAYERS IN BACH FAMILY.

From a painting of an ideal scene.]

Among the most remarkable of the false impressions which have prevailed

concerning Bach's personality, must be accounted the idea that he was

himself a pietist. Attempts have been made to prove this on the one hand

from the nature of the poems composed by him, on the other, from the

character of his music. And indeed, it is not difficult to discover in

many of the poetical texts which he wrote for his own church music, the

pietistic forms of expression. But since these forms, notwithstanding

a certain bombastic quality, a rapturous, exaggerated sentiment and an

exuberant tenderness, still strike a note of genuine poetry, they were

habitually employed by all writers of that day.

Not a single pietist, however, was included in the number of the poets

who wrote for Bach. One of these, Erdmann Neumeister, was, on the

contrary, a zealous champion of orthodoxy. And concerning the sympathy

between Bach's music and pietism, it must also be said here that nothing

beyond a certain analogy exists. A strong intensity of feeling is common

to both, and the profound intelligence exhibited by the musician in

following the most hidden meanings of his text, resembles the fervid

devotion with which the pietists were wont to read the Bible. Moreover,

the lofty idealism which inspired his artistic creations, causing him

to regard everything _sub specie aeterni_, as it were, corresponds

in a certain way to the unworldly spirit of the apostles of Spener,

who, lost in ecstasy, directed their gaze towards the pictured glories

of the heavenly sphere. But, while these pious souls gave themselves

up unreservedly to this sort of subjective fanaticism, with Bach the

personal feeling is always controlled by the utmost conceivable severity

of the musical form. The pietists renounced the world and the forces at

work in it; Bach founded his activity upon what had been created before

him in his art, and rejoiced, after the manner of his ancestors, in a

hearty enjoyment of the world and its beauty. It is not merely because

pietism interfered with the free exercise of his art that Bach refused

it his support, but rather because this particular religious bent was

distasteful to him in every way. The old Lutheran form of Protestantism

was an inheritance of his race, and his education had been carried on

in places where orthodoxy flourished. In Arnstadt it had victoriously

trampled under foot, before his coming, some feeble germs of pietism,

which of itself is almost sufficient reason for the attitude of quiet

hostility towards Spener, assumed by him from the beginning. The second

clergyman of the town, Georg Christian Eilmar, was an orthodox of the

strictest kind, and soon after his installation had fallen into a

violent controversy with Frohne, which lasted for years and was still in

progress when Bach came to Mühlhausen. The musician espoused Eilmar's

cause with ardor and did not hesitate to express his opinions publicly,

thus affording another manifestation of the spirit of obstinate defiance

which formed one of his fundamental traits. For it was impossible that

he should be attracted by a prosaic, arrogant, and thoroughly unpleasing

personality like that of Eilmar, neither was he in any wise a fanatical

partisan of orthodoxy. He held firmly to the belief of his fathers, but

to inquire into the principles of their faith was an idea that never

occurred to him. Whatever needs his religion may have failed to satisfy

were more than filled by his art and the conscientious manner in which he

exercised it.

For the next nine years of his life Bach was established in Weimar as

court organist and chamber musician; after 1714 he also officiated as

concert-master of the ducal chapel and performed some of the duties of

capellmeister. Everything that had been lacking in Mühlhausen, he found

here at the court of Duke Wilhelm Ernst, a man whose strongly marked

personal character was reflected upon his surroundings, imparting to

them something of the genial Thuringian spirit. Differing from most

of his compeers in possessing a lively sense of his obligations as a

ruler, he failed to cherish the delusion that his subjects only existed

for the convenience of the reigning class. He was of an earnest nature,

this great-grand-uncle of Goethe's friend Karl August, and lived

without ostentation, almost as simply indeed as an ordinary citizen,

in his castle of Wilhelmsburg. Without children and separated from

his wife after a brief, unhappy union, all his interests were centred

in the welfare of the little province; above all, he occupied himself

with church and school affairs. Even as a child, he had displayed

the strong theological bias which always distinguished him, and had

afterwards studied for three years at the University of Jena. His

favorite associates were members of the clerical profession, and in

order to provide for the spiritual needs of the town of Weimar, which

numbered at that time about 5,000 inhabitants, he increased the number of

preachers, in whose conferences and theological discussions he took an

active part. Orthodox in belief, he hated and prohibited all sectarian

controversy, and without diminishing his zeal for the elevation of

ecclesiastical standards and the broadening of church organization, he

extended a protecting care over the arts and sciences. Weimar owes to

him not only its gymnasium, but also the foundation of its library, at

present so justly renowned. He took pains to support an excellent music

chapel and even tolerated an opera at his court. Chamber music was by

no means neglected, but the strongest interest manifested by the duke

was in ecclesiastical matters, and during his long reign of forty-five

years (1683-1728), his persevering efforts to awaken in the court and

the citizens of the town an interest in the works of a great composer of

sacred music were crowned with deserved success.

No musicians of eminence were to be found in the Weimar of that day. The

aged capellmeister, Johann Samuel Drese, was in feeble health, making

it necessary for Bach to relieve him of a portion of his work. Johann

Gottfried Walther of Erfurt, who was related to Bach on his mother's

side, filled the place of organist in the town-church and soon formed an

intimate friendship with his kinsman. Walther's name has continued to

be held in esteem up to the present time through his musical lexicon,

which was published in Leipsic in 1732 and is a valuable reference

book for students of scientific music. But only the spare moments of

its industrious author were devoted to the preparation of this work.

In addition to his duties as organist, he was active as a composer and

also gave instruction in music, his services as teacher being greatly in

demand. His strength lies chiefly in the domain of organ music, where he

has successfully followed in the footsteps of Johann Pachelbel. In this

connection should be mentioned an artist from a neighboring state, who,

however, was often seen in Weimar, and who found a degree of pleasure

in Bach's society which the latter fully reciprocated. Georg Philipp

Telemann, one of the most skilful musicians of his age, enjoyed at that

time a greater celebrity than Bach, and steadily maintained to the end of

his life the reputation of a high musical authority. His style is wanting

in depth and earnestness, but he was one of the most prolific writers

the world has seen, showing an incredible activity in every species of

composition, so that in the end he was himself unable to say precisely

what or how much had proceeded from his pen.

Bach did not restrict his acquaintance to the narrow limits of his

immediate surroundings, but was in the habit of undertaking frequent

journeys with the view of spreading his fame as organ virtuoso and

composer. On one occasion before the end of the year 1714, he went to

Cassel for the purpose of testing an organ which had been newly restored.

Prince Frederick, son of the reigning duke and afterwards King of Sweden,

summoned him to play in his presence and was enchanted by the unheard-of

virtuosity of his pedal-playing. In the autumn of 1713, he passed some

time in Halle, on his return from a professional tour, and very possibly

attracted by a fine new organ, erected by Christoph Cuncius in the

Church of the Holy Virgin. The post of organist at this church having

been vacant for a year, it seems to have been suggested that Bach should

make application for the place. The proposal must at first have been a

tempting one, since the organ furnished him in Weimar was very inferior,

containing in all only two manuals and twenty-four stops, while that in

Halle had sixty-three sounding stops. He soon expressed his willingness

to accept the appointment, and prolonged his stay sufficiently to enable

him to compose the cantata required of all candidates and to conduct

the performance of the same. The church elders were now very anxious

to secure his services, but Bach left the place without awaiting their

decision. There were many drawbacks connected with the position, and the

thought of his friend and patron the duke caused him to waver. When,

therefore, the formal "call" was sent to him before Christmas, in the

shape of a regularly attested document, just as though the matter had

already been settled between them, Bach expressed his wish to discuss the

matter further before deciding. The authorities took offence at this,

and, quite without reason, practically accused him of only pretending

to treat with them, in order to obtain an increase of salary from the

duke. The sole attraction for Bach in Halle was undoubtedly its beautiful

organ. Up to this time he had been using instruments of small or medium

size, and indeed, throughout his long career, an organ adequate to the

genius of this greatest master in the world was never placed at his

command. Meantime the bold and arrogant manner in which he was accused of

evading his promise could not fail to be resented with indignation by a

man like Bach. He returned a very sharp letter of protest, which plainly

showed the church authorities that they had made a mistake. Realizing

later their want of tact, they sought to make amends by inviting him to

attend the trial performance on the new organ, and Bach accepted the

invitation.

In the course of a third journey known to have been made by Bach in the

autumn of 1714, he paid his first visit to Leipsic, the city in which

he was to spend the last twenty-seven years of his life. On the first

Sunday after Advent, he furnished all the organ music for the service

(conducted, probably, in the Thomas Church), and also produced a cantata

of his own composition. We are familiar with this cantata; it is one

of the most beautiful belonging to Bach's earlier period, and begins

with a chorus, based upon the old Ambrosian hymn, "Come, Saviour of

the people" ("_Veni, redemptor gentium_"). Not long afterwards, Bach

probably repaired to the ducal court at Meiningen, to which his cousin,

Johann Ludwig Bach, was attached as capellmeister. We have no knowledge

of any previous communication between the two branches of the family

descended from Veit Bach, and there is good ground for assuming that

it was Sebastian who made the advances in this instance. Johann Ludwig

had an especial gift for the composition of church music. Twenty-two

of his cantatas were copied out by Sebastian's own hand, and of still

greater importance than these are the motets by the same master, who, if

he does not equal Johann Christoph Bach of Eisenach, has yet introduced

into German music, with great success, the Italian method so brilliantly

exemplified by Leonardo Leo.

Another autumnal journey made by Sebastian Bach had for its goal

the Saxon electoral court at Dresden, where occurred one of the most

famous and memorable events of his life. He had always maintained the

most friendly relations with the German musicians attached to the

electoral chapel, who just now felt themselves unjustly thrust into the

background, owing to the preference of the court for the French and

Italian school of tonal art. It happened that precisely at this time

Jean Louis Marchand, an organist from Paris, was visiting in Dresden and

delighting the elector and his court by the elegance of his technique.

Bach had found as yet no opportunity of appearing before the court, but

so greatly distinguished himself in other musical circles as to create an

ardent interest in the question whether he or Marchand was the greater

artist. In the seventeenth and eighteenth centuries competitive musical

performances were in high favor. Bach, who was thoroughly acquainted with

the style of Marchand's playing and the character of his music, consented

to challenge the Frenchman to a trial of skill upon the clavier. Marchand

accepted and the tournament was arranged to take place, in the presence

of a select body of judges, at the house of a personage of high rank;

probably the minister, Graf von Flemming. When the appointed hour

arrived Bach was on the spot, but Marchand did not appear; in the sure

premonition of failure, he had abandoned the field without resistance.

Bach now played alone and enchanted his audience. The report of this

occurrence was rapidly spread abroad and served to add new lustre to the

fame of the master, who now stood forth a victorious champion of German

national art, as opposed to the theories and methods of the French.

These various professional journeys and the visit between the years

1715 and 1717 of Georg Erdmann, the friend of his youth, who, after

completing his study of the law, had entered the Russian service in 1715,

are the most important external events of Bach's stay in Weimar. If we

glance at his creative activity during that period, we see that the

principal emphasis falls upon his work as organ virtuoso and composer.

Duke Wilhelm took great pleasure in his playing, and this incited him

to use his utmost efforts in the art of handling his instrument. It was

in Weimar that he wrote the larger number of his very numerous organ

compositions, and he also made much progress here in the art of vocal

composition, besides becoming thoroughly acquainted for the first time

with Italian chamber music. The duke's nephew, Prince Johann Ernst, was

of a decidedly musical turn, and, with the aid of Walther, had even

made attempts at composition. In gratification of his tastes, frequent

concerts of chamber music were given at the castle, Bach acting as

leader. The violin concerto, which had just been revived in Italy through

the efforts of Torelli and Vivaldi, and the violin sonata in the form

established by Corelli, were favorite varieties of this sort of music,

in which Bach soon developed a strong interest, as is shown by the fact

that he arranged for the clavier and the organ about twenty of Vivaldi's

concertos. These works are not arrangements in the ordinary sense, but

are rather expansions of the original motives. By means of an animated

bass, a richly melodious baritone and artistic contrapuntal imitations,

Bach converted his material into something at once novel and charming.

He also took themes from the violin sonatas of Corelli and Albinoni,

while he richly elaborated and fashioned into an organ fugue, the leading

motive of a composition by the Venetian Legrenzi. That he entered very

heartily into the spirit of the Italian music of the day is evident from

his causing a copy to be made for himself of an important production

of Frescobaldi, the greatest Italian organ master. This work, entitled

"_Fiori Musicali_" appeared in 1635.

[Illustration: JOHANN SEBASTIAN BACH.

From an oil portrait owned by the Bach family until 1828. Now in

possession of A. Grenser, of Vienna.]

Famous composers and their works, Vol. 1 · 第 23 / 33 段