“We intend to make this a banner week in the history of the

Fund, which takes an interest in every one on the stage, be he

actor, singer, dancer, or workman. We have spent more than

$40,000 during the past year. Charity covers a multitude of

sins, but it also reveals a multitude of virtues. At the

opening of the former fair we had the assistance of Edwin Booth

and Joseph Jefferson. In their place we have to-day that

American institution and apostle of wide humanity--Mark Twain.”

As Mr. Frohman has said, charity reveals a multitude of virtues. This is

true, and it is to be proved here before the week is over. Mr. Frohman

has told you something of the object and something of the character of

the work. He told me he would do this—and he has kept his word! I had

expected to hear of it through the newspapers. I wouldn't trust anything

between Frohman and the newspapers—except when it's a case of charity!

You should all remember that the actor has been your benefactor many and

many a year. When you have been weary and downcast he has lifted your

heart out of gloom and given you a fresh impulse. You are all under

obligation to him. This is your opportunity to be his benefactor—to help

provide for him in his old age and when he suffers from infirmities.

At this fair no one is to be persecuted to buy. If you offer a

twenty-dollar bill in payment for a purchase of $1 you will receive

$19 in change. There is to be no robbery here. There is to be no creed

here—no religion except charity. We want to raise $250,000—and that is a

great task to attempt.

The President has set the fair in motion by pressing the button in

Washington. Now your good wishes are to be transmuted into cash.

By virtue of the authority in me vested I declare the fair open. I call

the ball game. Let the transmuting begin!

RUSSIAN REPUBLIC

The American auxiliary movement to aid the cause of freedom in Russia was

launched on the evening of April 11, 1906, at the Club A house, 3 Fifth

Avenue, with Mr. Clemens and Maxim Gorky as the principal spokesmen. Mr.

Clemens made an introductory address, presenting Mr. Gorky.

If we can build a Russian republic to give to the persecuted people of

the Tsar's domain the same measure of freedom that we enjoy, let us go

ahead and do it. We need not discuss the methods by which that purpose

is to be attained. Let us hope that fighting will be postponed or

averted for a while, but if it must come—

I am most emphatically in sympathy with the movement, now on foot

in Russia, to make that country free. I am certain that it will be

successful, as it deserves to be. Any such movement should have and

deserves our earnest and unanimous co-operation, and such a petition for

funds as has been explained by Mr. Hunter, with its just and powerful

meaning, should have the utmost support of each and every one of us.

Anybody whose ancestors were in this country when we were trying to free

ourselves from oppression, must sympathize with those who now are trying

to do the same thing in Russia.

The parallel I have just drawn only goes to show that it makes no

difference whether the oppression is bitter or not; men with red, warm

blood in their veins will not endure it, but will seek to cast it off.

If we keep our hearts in this matter Russia will be free.

RUSSIAN SUFFERERS

On December 18, 1905, an entertainment was given at the Casino

for the benefit of the Russian sufferers. After the

performance Mr. Clemens spoke.

LADIES AND GENTLEMEN,—It seems a sort of cruelty to inflict upon an

audience like this our rude English tongue, after we have heard that

divine speech flowing in that lucid Gallic tongue.

It has always been a marvel to me—that French language; it has always

been a puzzle to me. How beautiful that language is. How expressive it

seems to be. How full of grace it is.

And when it comes from lips like those, how eloquent and how liquid

it is. And, oh, I am always deceived—I always think I am going to

understand it.

Oh, it is such a delight to me, such a delight to me, to meet Madame

Bernhardt, and laugh hand to hand and heart to heart with her.

I have seen her play, as we all have, and oh, that is divine; but I have

always wanted to know Madame Bernhardt herself—her fiery self. I have

wanted to know that beautiful character.

Why, she is the youngest person I ever saw, except myself—for I always

feel young when I come in the presence of young people.

I have a pleasant recollection of an incident so many years ago—when

Madame Bernhardt came to Hartford, where I lived, and she was going

to play and the tickets were three dollars, and there were two lovely

women—a widow and her daughter—neighbors of ours, highly cultivated

ladies they were; their tastes were fine and elevated, but they were

very poor, and they said “Well, we must not spend six dollars on a

pleasure of the mind, a pleasure of the intellect; we must spend it, if

it must go at all, to furnish to somebody bread to eat.”

And so they sorrowed over the fact that they had to give up that great

pleasure of seeing Madame Bernhardt, but there were two neighbors

equally highly cultivated and who could not afford bread, and those

good-hearted Joneses sent that six dollars—deprived themselves of it—and

sent it to those poor Smiths to buy bread with. And those Smiths took it

and bought tickets with it to see Madame Bernhardt.

Oh yes, some people have tastes and intelligence also.

Now, I was going to make a speech—I supposed I was, but I am not. It

is late, late; and so I am going to tell a story; and there is this

advantage about a story, anyway, that whatever moral or valuable thing

you put into a speech, why, it gets diffused among those involuted

sentences and possibly your audience goes away without finding out what

that valuable thing was that you were trying to confer upon it; but,

dear me, you put the same jewel into a story and it becomes the keystone

of that story, and you are bound to get it—it flashes, it flames, it is

the jewel in the toad's head—you don't overlook that.

Now, if I am going to talk on such a subject as, for instance, the lost

opportunity—oh, the lost opportunity. Anybody in this house who has

reached the turn of life—sixty, or seventy, or even fifty, or along

there—when he goes back along his history, there he finds it mile-stoned

all the way with the lost opportunity, and you know how pathetic that

is.

You younger ones cannot know the full pathos that lies in those

words—the lost opportunity; but anybody who is old, who has really lived

and felt this life, he knows the pathos of the lost opportunity.

Now, I will tell you a story whose moral is that, whose lesson is that,

whose lament is that.

I was in a village which is a suburb of New Bedford several years

ago—well, New Bedford is a suburb of Fair Haven, or perhaps it is the

other way; in any case, it took both of those towns to make a great

centre of the great whaling industry of the first half of the nineteenth

century, and I was up there at Fair Haven some years ago with a friend

of mine.

There was a dedication of a great town-hall, a public building, and we

were there in the afternoon. This great building was filled, like this

great theatre, with rejoicing villagers, and my friend and I started

down the centre aisle. He saw a man standing in that aisle, and he said

“Now, look at that bronzed veteran—at that mahogany-faced man. Now, tell

me, do you see anything about that man's face that is emotional? Do you

see anything about it that suggests that inside that man anywhere there

are fires that can be started? Would you ever imagine that that is a

human volcano?”

“Why, no,” I said, “I would not. He looks like a wooden Indian in front

of a cigar store.”

“Very well,” said my friend, “I will show you that there is emotion even

in that unpromising place. I will just go to that man and I will just

mention in the most casual way an incident in his life. That man is

getting along toward ninety years old. He is past eighty. I will mention

an incident of fifty or sixty years ago. Now, just watch the effect, and

it will be so casual that if you don't watch you won't know when I do

say that thing—but you just watch the effect.”

He went on down there and accosted this antiquity, and made a remark

or two. I could not catch up. They were so casual I could not recognize

which one it was that touched that bottom, for in an instant that old

man was literally in eruption and was filling the whole place with

profanity of the most exquisite kind. You never heard such accomplished

profanity. I never heard it also delivered with such eloquence.

I never enjoyed profanity as I enjoyed it then—more than if I had been

uttering it myself. There is nothing like listening to an artist—all

his passions passing away in lava, smoke, thunder, lightning, and

earthquake.

Then this friend said to me: “Now, I will tell you about that. About

sixty years ago that man was a young fellow of twenty-three, and had

just come home from a three years' whaling voyage. He came into that

village of his, happy and proud because now, instead of being chief

mate, he was going to be master of a whaleship, and he was proud and

happy about it.

“Then he found that there had been a kind of a cold frost come upon that

town and the whole region roundabout; for while he had been away the

Father Mathew temperance excitement had come upon the whole region.

Therefore, everybody had taken the pledge; there wasn't anybody for

miles and miles around that had not taken the pledge.

“So you can see what a solitude it was to this young man, who was fond

of his grog. And he was just an outcast, because when they found he

would not join Father Mathew's Society they ostracized him, and he went

about that town three weeks, day and night, in utter loneliness—the only

human being in the whole place who ever took grog, and he had to take it

privately.

“If you don't know what it is to be ostracized, to be shunned by your

fellow-man, may you never know it. Then he recognized that there

was something more valuable in this life than grog, and that is the

fellowship of your fellow-man. And at last he gave it up, and at nine

o'clock one night he went down to the Father Mathew Temperance Society,

and with a broken heart he said: 'Put my name down for membership in

this society.'

“And then he went away crying, and at earliest dawn the next morning

they came for him and routed him out, and they said that new ship of his

was ready to sail on a three years' voyage. In a minute he was on board

that ship and gone.

“And he said—well, he was not out of sight of that town till he began to

repent, but he had made up his mind that he would not take a drink, and

so that whole voyage of three years was a three years' agony to that man

because he saw all the time the mistake he had made.

“He felt it all through; he had constant reminders of it, because the

crew would pass him with their grog, come out on the deck and take it,

and there was the torturous Smell of it.

“He went through the whole, three years of suffering, and at last coming

into port it was snowy, it was cold, he was stamping through the snow

two feet deep on the deck and longing to get home, and there was his

crew torturing him to the last minute with hot grog, but at last he had

his reward. He really did get to shore at last, and jumped and ran

and bought a jug and rushed to the society's office, and said to the

secretary:

“'Take my name off your membership books, and do it right away! I have

got a three years' thirst on.'

“And the secretary said: 'It is not necessary. You were blackballed!'”

WATTERSON AND TWAIN AS REBELS

ADDRESS AT THE CELEBRATION OF ABRAHAM LINCOLN'S 92ND BIRTHDAY

ANNIVERSARY, CARNEGIE HALL, FEBRUARY 11, 1901, TO RAISE FUNDS

FOR THE LINCOLN MEMORIAL UNIVERSITY AT CUMBERLAND GAP, TENN.

LADIES AND GENTLEMEN,—The remainder of my duties as presiding chairman

here this evening are but two—only two. One of them is easy, and the

other difficult. That is to say, I must introduce the orator, and then

keep still and give him a chance. The name of Henry Watterson carries

with it its own explanation. It is like an electric light on top of

Madison Square Garden; you touch the button and the light flashes up out

of the darkness. You mention the name of Henry Watterson, and your

minds are at once illuminated with the splendid radiance of his fame and

achievements. A journalist, a soldier, an orator, a statesman, a rebel.

Yes, he was a rebel; and, better still, now he is a reconstructed rebel.

It is a curious circumstance, a circumstance brought about without any

collusion or prearrangement, that he and I, both of whom were rebels

related by blood to each other, should be brought here together this

evening bearing a tribute in our hands and bowing our heads in reverence

to that noble soul who for three years we tried to destroy. I don't

know as the fact has ever been mentioned before, but it is a fact,

nevertheless. Colonel Watterson and I were both rebels, and we are blood

relations. I was a second lieutenant in a Confederate company for a

while—oh, I could have stayed on if I had wanted to. I made myself felt,

I left tracks all around the country. I could have stayed on, but it was

such weather. I never saw such weather to be out-of-doors in, in all my

life.

The Colonel commanded a regiment, and did his part, I suppose, to

destroy the Union. He did not succeed, yet if he had obeyed me he would

have done so. I had a plan, and I fully intended to drive General Grant

into the Pacific Ocean—if I could get transportation. I told Colonel

Watterson about it. I told him what he had to do. What I wanted him to

do was to surround the Eastern army and wait until I came up. But he was

insubordinate; he stuck on some quibble of military etiquette about a

second lieutenant giving orders to a colonel or something like that.

And what was the consequence? The Union was preserved. This is the first

time I believe that that secret has ever been revealed.

No one outside of the family circle, I think, knew it before; but there

the facts are. Watterson saved the Union; yes, he saved the Union. And

yet there he sits, and not a step has been taken or a movement made

toward granting him a pension. That is the way things are done. It is

a case where some blushing ought to be done. You ought to blush, and I

ought to blush, and he—well, he's a little out of practice now.

ROBERT FULTON FUND

ADDRESS MADE ON THE EVENING OF APRIL 19, 1906

Mr. Clemens had been asked to address the association by Gen.

Frederick D. Grant, president. He was offered a fee of $1,000,

but refused it, saying:

“I shall be glad to do it, but I must stipulate that you keep

the $1,000, and add it to the Memorial Fund as my contribution

to erect a monument in New York to the memory of the man who

applied steam to navigation.”

At this meeting Mr. Clemens made this formal announcement from

the platform:

“This is my last appearance on the paid platform. I shall not

retire from the gratis platform until I am buried, and courtesy

will compel me to keep still and not disturb the others. Now,

since I must, I shall say good-bye. I see many faces in this

audience well known to me. They are all my friends, and I feel

that those I don't know are my friends, too. I wish to

consider that you represent the nation, and that in saying

good-bye to you I am saying good-bye to the nation. In the

great name of humanity, let me say this final word: I offer an

appeal in behalf of that vast, pathetic multitude of fathers,

mothers, and helpless little children. They were sheltered and

happy two days ago. Now they are wandering, forlorn, hopeless,

and homeless, the victims of a great disaster. So I beg of

you, I beg of you, to open your hearts and open your purses and

remember San Francisco, the smitten city.”

I wish to deliver a historical address. I've been studying the history

of—-er—a—let me see—a [then he stopped in confusion, and walked over to

Gen. Fred D. Grant, who sat at the head of the platform. He leaned

over in a whisper, and then returned to the front of the stage and

continued]. Oh yes! I've been studying Robert Fulton. I've been studying

a biographical sketch of Robert Fulton, the inventor of—er—a—let's

see—ah yes, the inventor of the electric telegraph and the Morse

sewing—machine. Also, I understand he invented the air—diria—pshaw! I

have it at last—the dirigible balloon. Yes, the dirigible—but it is a

difficult word, and I don't see why anybody should marry a couple of

words like that when they don't want to be married at all and are likely

to quarrel with each other all the time. I should put that couple

of words under the ban of the United States Supreme Court, under its

decision of a few days ago, and take 'em out and drown 'em.

I used to know Fulton. It used to do me good to see him dashing through

the town on a wild broncho.

And Fulton was born in—-er—a—Well, it doesn't make much difference where

he was born, does it? I remember a man who came to interview me once,

to get a sketch of my life. I consulted with a friend—a practical

man—before he came, to know how I should treat him.

“Whenever you give the interviewer a fact,” he said, “give him another

fact that will contradict it. Then he'll go away with a jumble that

he can't use at all. Be gentle, be sweet, smile like an idiot—just be

natural.” That's what my friend told me to do, and I did it.

“Where were you born?” asked the interviewer.

“Well-er-a,” I began, “I was born in Alabama, or Alaska, or the Sandwich

Islands; I don't know where, but right around there somewhere. And you

had better put it down before you forget it.”

“But you weren't born in all those places,” he said.

“Well, I've offered you three places. Take your choice. They're all at

the same price.”

“How old are you?” he asked.

“I shall be nineteen in June,” I said.

“Why, there's such a discrepancy between your age and your looks,” he

said.

“Oh, that's nothing,” I said, “I was born discrepantly.”

Then we got to talking about my brother Samuel, and he told me my

explanations were confusing.

“I suppose he is dead,” I said. “Some said that he was dead and some

said that he wasn't.”

“Did you bury him without knowing whether he was dead or not?” asked the

reporter.

“There was a mystery,” said I. “We were twins, and one day when we were

two weeks old—that is, he was one week old, and I was one week old—we

got mixed up in the bath-tub, and one of us drowned. We never could tell

which. One of us had a strawberry birthmark on the back of his hand.

There it is on my hand. This is the one that was drowned. There's no

doubt about it.

“Where's the mystery?” he said.

“Why, don't you see how stupid it was to bury the wrong twin?” I

answered. I didn't explain it any more because he said the explanation

confused him. To me it is perfectly plain.

But, to get back to Fulton. I'm going along like an old man I used to

know who used to start to tell a story about his grandfather. He had an

awfully retentive memory, and he never finished the story, because

he switched off into something else. He used to tell about how his

grandfather one day went into a pasture, where there was a ram. The old

man dropped a silver dime in the grass, and stooped over to pick it

up. The ram was observing him, and took the old man's action as an

invitation.

Just as he was going to finish about the ram this friend of mine would

recall that his grandfather had a niece who had a glass eye. She used

to loan that glass eye to another lady friend, who used it when she

received company. The eye didn't fit the friend's face, and it was

loose. And whenever she winked it would turn over.

Then he got on the subject of accidents, and he would tell a story about

how he believed accidents never happened.

“There was an Irishman coming down a ladder with a hod of bricks,” he

said, “and a Dutchman was standing on the ground below. The Irishman

fell on the Dutchman and killed him. Accident? Never! If the Dutchman

hadn't been there the Irishman would have been killed. Why didn't the

Irishman fall on a dog which was next to the Dutchman? Because the dog

would have seen him coming.”

Then he'd get off from the Dutchman to an uncle named Reginald Wilson.

Reginald went into a carpet factory one day, and got twisted into the

machinery's belt. He went excursioning around the factory until he was

properly distributed and was woven into sixty-nine yards of the best

three-ply carpet. His wife bought the carpet, and then she erected a

monument to his memory. It read:

Sacred to the memory

of

sixty-nine yards of the best three-ply carpet

containing the mortal remainders of

REGINALD WILSON

Go thou and do likewise

And so on he would ramble about telling the story of his grandfather

until we never were told whether he found the ten-cent piece or whether

something else happened.

FULTON DAY, JAMESTOWN

ADDRESS DELIVERED SEPTEMBER 23, 1907

Lieutenant-Governor Ellyson, of Virginia, in introducing Mr.

Clemens, said:

“The people have come here to bring a tribute of affectionate

recollection for the man who has contributed so much to the

progress of the world and the happiness of mankind.” As Mr.

Clemens came down to the platform the applause became louder

and louder, until Mr. Clemens held out his hand for silence.

It was a great triumph, and it was almost a minute after the

applause ceased before Mr. Clemens could speak. He attempted

it once, and when the audience noticed his emotion, it cheered

again loudly.

LADIES AND GENTLEMEN,—I am but human, and when you, give me a reception

like that I am obliged to wait a little while I get my voice. When you

appeal to my head, I don't feel it; but when you appeal to my heart, I

do feel it.

We are here to celebrate one of the greatest events of American history,

and not only in American history, but in the world's history.

Indeed it was—the application of steam by Robert Fulton.

It was a world event—there are not many of them. It is peculiarly

an American event, that is true, but the influence was very broad in

effect. We should regard this day as a very great American holiday. We

have not many that are exclusively American holidays. We have the Fourth

of July, which we regard as an American holiday, but it is nothing of

the kind. I am waiting for a dissenting voice. All great efforts that

led up to the Fourth of July were made, not by Americans, but by English

residents of America, subjects of the King of England.

They fought all the fighting that was done, they shed and spilt all the

blood that was spilt, in securing to us the invaluable liberties which

are incorporated in the Declaration of Independence; but they were not

Americans. They signed the Declaration of Independence; no American's

name is signed to that document at all. There never was an American such

as you and I are until after the Revolution, when it had all been fought

out and liberty secured, after the adoption of the Constitution, and the

recognition of the Independence of America by all powers.

While we revere the Fourth of July—and let us always revere it, and the

liberties it conferred upon us—yet it was not an American event, a great

American day.

It was an American who applied that steam successfully. There are not

a great many world events, and we have our full share. The telegraph,

telephone, and the application of steam to navigation—these are great

American events.

To-day I have been requested, or I have requested myself, not to confine

myself to furnishing you with information, but to remind you of things,

and to introduce one of the nation's celebrants.

Admiral Harrington here is going to tell you all that I have left

untold. I am going to tell you all that I know, and then he will follow

up with such rags and remnants as he can find, and tell you what he

knows.

No doubt you have heard a great deal about Robert Fulton and the

influences that have grown from his invention, but the little steamboat

is suffering neglect.

Mark Twain's Speeches · 第 13 / 20 段