CHAPTER XII

THE MECHANISM OF LOVE

_IV. Hermaphrodism.--Sexual life of

oysters.--Gasteropodes.--The idea of reproduction

and the idea of pleasure.--Mechanism of

reciprocal reproduction: helices.--Spintrian

habits.--Reflections on hermaphrodism._

Fish are the only vertebrates among whom one encounters hermaphrodism,

either accidental: cyprins, herrings, scombers; or regular, sargue,

sparaillon, seran. The myxines, very humble fish living as parasites,

are alternative hermaphrodites, like oysters, like ascides; the genital

gland functions first as testicle, then as ovary. The amphioxus, the

bridge between invertebrates and vertebrates, is not hermaphrodite.

The most strongly marked and most complicated forms of hermaphrodism

are found in mollusks, and chiefly in gasteropodes. The alternate

hermaphrodism of oysters produces effects which have been observed

throughout antiquity. The advice to abstain from oysters during months

lacking an "r" is based on a fact, and that fact sexual. From September

to May, they are males, they are testicles, they elaborate sperm, they

are good; from June to August the ovaries bourgeon, fill with eggs

which turn whitish as they ripen, the oysters are females, they are

bad; fecundation takes place at this time, the spermatozoides, born

in the preceding period, finally perform their office. Superstitions

before being rejected ought to be minutely observed and analysed, there

is nearly always a kernel of truth in the gross envelope.

In the hermaphrodism of echinoderms, of fish, there is never

auto-fecundation; either the sexual products meet outside the animals,

which have neither copulating organs, nor a related genital life; it is

a simple growth of germs; or, in a more complex phase the individuals

have exterior male organs, and female organs, but they can not use them

without the aid of another individual acting either as male, or as

female. Here a new distinction is imposed: either the animal will be

successively male, and then female; or it will be both at once. This

union of the two sexes seems useless, according to human logic, when

the two genital glands ripen at different seasons; one understands it

better when the reciprocal fecundation is simultaneous, since this

doubles the number of females and better assures the conservation of

the specie. One must set aside the idea of pleasure. Apart from the

fact that we can judge it only by a very distant and even dubious

analogy considering the difference between the nervous systems of man

and mollusk, one must set it aside as useless. Pleasure is a result

not an aim. In most animal species coition is but a prelude to death,

and often love and death work their supreme act in the same instant.

Copulation of insects is suicide: would it be reasonable to consider

it as produced by a desire to die? One must dissociate the idea of

pleasure and the idea of love, if one wants to understand anything

of the tragic movements which perpetually beget life at the expense

of life itself. Pleasure explains nothing. People might simply be

commanded to die as a means of reproduction, they would obey with

the same eagerness: this is observed even in humanity. Dithyrambs on

pleasure would be misplaced apropos of the mutual ticklings of two

snails on a vine-leaf; the subject is rather uncomfortable.

Note then two helices, both bisexual, fulfilling exactly the biblical

phrase: "he created them male and female"; their genital organs are

very well developed; the penis and oviduct opening into a vestibule,

which in the act of copulation unbellies itself in part, so that the

penis and vagina come in touch with the orifice; mutual intromission

takes place. A third organ comes from the vestibule, without analogy in

superior animals; it is a little pocket containing a small stiletto,

a jewelled dagger; it is an excitative organ, the needle to prick up

desires. These beasts who have prepared for love by fasting, by long

rubbings, by whole days of close pressure, finally come to a decision,

the swords come out of their scabbards, they conscientiously stab each

other, this causes the penis to rise from its sheath; the double mating

is accomplished.

There are species in which the position of the organs is such that the

same individual can not be at the same time the female of the one for

whom he acts as male, but he can at that moment serve as female to

another male, who is female to a third, and so on. This explains the

garlands of spintrian gasteropodes which one sees realizing innocently

and according to the ineluctable wish of nature, carnal imaginations

that have been the boast of erotic humanity. Facing this light from

animal habits, debauchery loses all character and all its tang, because

it loses all immorality. Man, who unites in himself the aptitudes of

all the animals, all their laborious instincts, all their industries,

could not escape the heritage of their sexual methods; and there is no

lewdness which has not its normal type in nature, somewhere.

Before leaving this repugnant milieu, one may still consider the leech.

Hermaphrodite, they also practice reciprocal fecundation, but the

position of their organs compels them to assume a peculiar position:

the prong emerges from a pore near the mouth; the vagina is above the

anus. The copulation of these wretched animals forms, therefore, a

head-to-tail, the bocal sucker coinciding with the anal sucker.

Animals having both sexes, do not necessarily show sexual dimorphism.

But neither this exact likeness of individuals, nor the double function

with which they are charged, contradicts the general law which seems

to wish that an individual should be due to elements coming from

two different individuals. Autofecundation is exceptional, is very

rare. Whether or no the individual possess the two genital glands,

or one of them only, it needs a male, or an individual acting as

male, and a female or an individual acting as female, to perpetuate

life. Alternative hermaphrodism confirms these propositions, be it

that the same gland transforms itself totally, turn by turn, into

male principle, then into female principle; be it divided between a

male half and a female half, these two halves ripen simultaneously or

successively. When there is total or partial alternation, the male

principle is ready first, and waits: thus the aggressivity of the

male, and the passivity of the female are visible in the most obscure

manifestations of sexual life: the fundamental psychology of an ascide

does not differ from that of an insect, or from that of a mammal.

The Natural Philosophy of Love · 第 12 / 20 章