CHAPTER XI.

MR. McKINLEY'S ADMINISTRATION

The Nestor of the original McKinley Cabinet was John Sherman, who left

his Senate seat to the swiftly rising Hanna that he himself might devote

his eminent but failing powers to the Secretaryship of State. Upon the

outbreak of the Spanish War he was succeeded by William R. Day, who had

been Assistant Secretary. In 1898 Day in turn resigned, when Ambassador

John Hay was called to the place from the Court of St. James. The

Treasury went to Lyman J. Gage, a distinguished Illinois banker. Mr.

Gage was a Democrat, and this appointment was doubtless meant as a

recognition of the Gold Democracy's aid in the campaign. General Russell

A. Alger, of Michigan, took charge of the War Department, holding it

till July 19, 1899, after which Elihu Root was installed.

Postmaster-General James A. Gary, of Maryland, resigned the same month

with Sherman, giving place to Charles Emory Smith, of the Philadelphia

Press. The Navy portfolio fell to John D. Long, of Massachusetts; that

of the Interior to Cornelius N. Bliss, of New York; that of Agriculture

to James Wilson, of Iowa. In December, 1898, Ethan Allen Hitchcock, of

Missouri, succeeded Bliss.

[Illustration: Portrait.]

John Sherman.

[Illustration: Working at desk.]

Lyman J. Gage, Secretary of the Treasury.

[Illustration: Working at desk.]

John D. Long, Secretary of the Navy.

[Illustration: Working at desk.]

Cornelius N. Bliss,

Secretary of the Interior.

[Illustration: Working at desk.]

Russell A. Alger,

Secretary of War.

Fortunately for the new Chief Magistrate, who had been announced as the

"advance agent of prosperity," the year 1897 brought a revival of

business. This was due in part to the end, at least for the time, of

political suspense and agitation, in part to the confidence which

capitalists felt in the new Administration.

The money stringency, too, now began to abate. The annual output of the

world's gold mines, which had for some years been increasing, appeared

to have terminated the fall of general prices, prevalent almost

incessantly since 1873. Moreover, continued increase seemed assured, not

only by the invention of new processes, which made it lucrative to work

tailings and worn-out mines, but also by the discovery of several rich

auriferous tracts hitherto unknown.

[Illustration: Working at desk.]

James Wilson,

Secretary of Agriculture.

[Illustration: Working at desk.]

Postmaster-General Gary.

From a copyrighted photo by Clinedinst.

The valley of the Yukon, in Alaska and the adjacent British territory,

had long been known to contain gold, but none suspected there a bonanza

like the South African Rand. In the six months' night of 1896-1897 an

old squaw-man made an unprecedented strike upon the Klondike

(Thron-Duick or Tondak) River, 2,000 miles up the Yukon. By spring all

his neighbors had staked rich claims. Next July $2,000,000 worth of gold

came south by one shipment, precipitating a rush to the inhospitable

mining regions hardly second to the California migration of 1849.

Latter-day Argonauts, not dismayed by the untold dangers and hardships

in store, toiled up the Yukon, or, swarming over the precipitous

Chilcoot Pass, braved, too often at cost of life, the boiling rapids to

be passed in descending the Upper Yukon to the gold fields. Later the

easier and well-wooded White Pass was found, traversed, at length, by a

railroad. In October, 1898, the Cape Nome coast, north of the Yukon

mouth, uncovered its riches, whereupon treasure-seekers turned thither

their attention, even from the Yukon.

Little lawlessness pestered the gold settlements. The Dominion promptly

despatched to Dawson a body of her famous mounted police. Our

Government, more tardily, made its authority felt from St. Michaels,

near the Yukon mouth, all the way to the Canadian border. On June 6,

1900, Alaska was constituted a civil and judicial district, with a

governor, whose functions were those of a territorial governor. When

necessary the miners themselves formed tribunals and meted out a

rough-and-ready justice.

[Illustration: Men with huge piles of supplies.]

Rush of Miners to the Yukon.

The City of Caches at the Summit of Chilcoot Pass.

The rush of miners to the middle Yukon gold region, which, together with

certain ports and waters on the way thither, were claimed by both the

United States and Great Britain, made acute the question of the true

boundary between Alaskan and British territory.

In 1825 Great Britain and Russia, the latter then owning Alaska, agreed

by treaty to separate their respective possessions by a line commencing

at the southernmost point of Prince of Wales Island and running along

Portland Channel to the continental coast at 56 degrees north latitude.

North of that degree the boundary was to run along mountain summits

parallel to the coast until it intersected the 141st meridian west

longitude, which was then to be followed to the frozen ocean. In case

any of the summits mentioned should be more than ten marine leagues from

the ocean, the line was to parallel the coast, and be never more than

ten marine leagues therefrom.

When it became important to determine and mark the boundary in a more

exact manner, Great Britain advanced two new claims; first, that the

"Portland Channel" mentioned in the Russo-British treaty was not the

channel now known by that name, but rather Behm Channel, next west, or

Clarence Straits; and, secondly, that the ten-league limit should be

measured from the outer rim of the archipelago skirting Alaska, and not

from the mainland coast. If conceded, these claims would add to the

Canadian Dominion about 29,000 square miles, including 100 miles of

sea-coast, with harbors like Lynn Channel and Tahko Inlet, several

islands, vast mining, fishery, and timber resources, as well as Juneau

City, Revilla, and Fort Tongass, theretofore undisputably American.

In September, 1898, a joint high commission sat at Quebec and canvassed

all moot matters between the two countries, among them that of the

Alaska boundary. It adjourned, however, without settling the question,

though a temporary and provisional understanding was reached and signed

October 20, 1899.

The commissioners gave earnest attention to the sealing question, which

had been plaguing the United States ever since the Paris arbitration

tribunal upset Secretary Blaine's contention that Bering Sea was mare

clausum. Upon that tribunal's decision the modus vivendi touching seals

lapsed, and Canadians, with renewed and ruthless zeal, plied

seal-killing upon the high seas. Dr. David S. Jordan, American delegate

to the 1896-1897 Conference of Fur-Seal Experts, estimated that the

American seal herd had shrunken 15 per cent. in 1896, and that a full

third of that year's pups, orphaned by pelagic sealing, had starved.

Reckoning from the beginning of the industry and in round numbers, he

estimated that 400,000 breeding females had been slaughtered, that

300,000 pups had perished for want of nourishment, and that 400,000

unborn pups had died with their dams. This estimate disregarded the

multitude of females lost after being speared or shot. Dr. Jordan

predicted the not distant extinction of the fur-seal trade unless

protective measures should be forthwith devised. British experts

questioned some of his conclusions, but admitted the need of restriction

upon pelagic sealing.

The McKinley Administration besought Great Britain for a suspension of

seal-killing during 1897. After a delay of four months the Foreign

Office replied that it was too late to stop the sealers that year. In a

rather undiplomatic note, dated May 10, 1897, Secretary Sherman charged

dilatory and evasive conduct upon this question. The retort was that the

American Government was seeking to embarrass British subjects in

pursuing lawful vocations.

Moved by Canada, Great Britain recanted her offer to join the United

States, Russia, and Japan in a complete system of sealing regulations.

The three countries last named thereupon agreed with each other to

suspend pelagic sealing so long as expert opinion declared it necessary

to the continued existence of the seals. The Canadians declined to

consider suspension save on the condition that the owners of sealing

vessels should receive compensation. In December, the same year (1897),

our Government ordered confiscated and destroyed all sealskins brought

to our ports not accompanied with invoices signed by the United States

Consul at the place of exportation, certifying that they were not taken

at sea. This cut off the Canadians' best market and so far diminished

their activity; but pelagic sealing still continued, under the

inefficient Paris regulations, and the herd went on diminishing.

That these Canadian controversies left so little sting, but were

followed by closer and closer rapprochement between the United States

and Great Britain, was fortunate in view of the failure of the

Anglo-American Arbitration Treaty. This had been negotiated by Mr.

Cleveland's able Secretary of State, Hon. Richard Olney, and represented

the best ethical thought of both nations. President McKinley endorsed

it, but it fell short of a two-thirds Senatorial vote.

On June 16, 1897, a treaty was signed annexing the Hawaiian Republic to

the United States. The Government of Hawaii speedily ratified this, but

it encountered in the United States Senate such buffets that after a

year it was withdrawn, and a resolution to the same end introduced in

both Houses. A majority in each chamber would annex, while the treaty

method would require a two-thirds vote in the Senate. The resolution

provided for the assumption by the United States of the Hawaiian debt up

to $4,000,000. Our Chinese Exclusion Law was extended to the islands,

and Chinese immigration thence to the continental republic prohibited.

The joint resolution passed July 6, 1898, a majority of the Democrats

and several Republicans, among these Speaker Reed, opposing. Shelby M.

Cullom, John T. Morgan, Robert R. Hitt, Sanford B. Dole, and Walter F.

Frear, made commissioners by its authority, drafted a territorial form

of government, which became law April 30, 1900.

Pursuant to the platform pledge of his party President McKinley early in

his term appointed Edward O. Wolcott, Adlai E. Stevenson, and Charles J.

Paine special envoys to the Powers in the interest of international

bi-metallism. The mission was mentioned with smiles by gold men and with

sneers by silver men, yet the cordial cooperation of France made it for

a time seem hopeful. The British Cabinet, too, were not ill-disposed,

pointing out that while Great Britain herself must retain the gold

standard, they earnestly wished a stable ratio between silver and gold

on British India's account. Sir Michael Hicks-Beach, Chancellor of the

Exchequer, had little doubt that if a solid international agreement

could be reached India would reopen her mints to silver. But the Indian

Council unanimously declined to do this. The Bank of England was at

first disposed to accept silver as part of its reserve, a course which

the law permitted; but a storm of protests from the "city banks"

dismayed the directors into withdrawal. Lacking England's cooperation

the mission, like its numerous predecessors, came to naught.

In Civil Service administration Mr. McKinley took one long and

unfortunate step backward. The Republican platform, adopted after Mr.

Cleveland's extension of the merit system, emphatically endorsed this,

as did Mr. McKinley himself. Against extreme pressure, particularly in

the War Department, the President bravely stood out till May 29, 1899.

His order of that date withdrew from the classified service 4,000 or

more positions, removed 3,500 from the class theretofore filled through

competitive examination or an orderly practice of promotion, and placed

6,416 more under a system drafted by the Secretary of War. The order

declared regular a large number of temporary appointments made without

examination, besides rendering eligible, as emergency appointees,

without examination, thousands who had served during the Spanish War.

Republicans pointed to the deficit under the Wilson Law with much the

same concern manifested by President Cleveland in 1888 over the surplus.

A new tariff law must be passed, and, if possible, before a new

Congressional election. An extra session of Congress was therefore

summoned for March 15, 1897. The Ways and Means Committee, which had

been at work for three months, forthwith reported through Chairman

Nelson Dingley the bill which bore his name. With equal promptness the

Committee on Rules brought in a rule, at once adopted by the House,

whereby the new bill, spite of Democratic pleas for time to examine,

discuss, and propose amendments, reached the Senate the last day of

March. More deliberation marked procedure in the Senate. This body

passed the bill after toning up its schedules with some 870 amendments,

most of which pleased the Conference Committee and became law. The Act

was signed by the President July 24, 1897.

[Illustration: Portrait.]

Nelson Dingley.

The Dingley Act was estimated by its author to advance the average rate

from the 40 per cent. of the Wilson Bill to approximately 50 per cent.,

or a shade higher than the McKinley rate. As proportioned to consumption

the tax imposed by it was probably heavier than that under either of its

predecessors.

[Illustration]

Warships in the Hudson River Celebrating

the Dedication of Grant's Tomb, April 27, 1897.

Reciprocity, a feature of the McKinley Tariff Act, was suspended by the

Wilson Act. The Republican platform of 1896 declared protection and

reciprocity twin measures of Republican policy. Clauses graced the

Dingley Act allowing reciprocity treaties to be made, "duly ratified" by

the Senate and "approved" by Congress; yet, of the twins, protection

proved stout and lusty, while the weaker sister languished. Under the

third section of the Act some concessions were given and received, but

the treaties negotiated under the fourth section, which involved

lowering of strictly protective duties, met summary defeat when

submitted to the Senate.

[Illustration: Cone shaped dome, atop a cylinder of columns, atop a

rectangular base.]

Grant's Tomb, Riverside Drive, New York.

Copyright, 1901, by Detroit Photographic Co.

The granite mausoleum in Riverside Park, New York City, designed to

receive the remains of General Grant, was completed in 1897, and upon

the 27th of April, that year, formally presented to the city. Ten days

previously the body had been removed thither from the brick tomb where

it had reposed since August 8, 1885. Four massive granite piers, with

rows of Doric columns between, supported the roof and the obtuse cone of

the cupola, which rested upon a great circle of Ionic pillars. The

interior was cruciform. In the centre was the crypt, where, upon a

square platform, rested the red porphyry sarcophagus. From the mausoleum

summit, 150 feet above, the eye swept the Hudson for miles up and down.

The presentation day procession was headed by the presidential party.

The Governor of New York State, the Mayor of the city, and the United

States diplomatic corps were prominent. Other distinguished guests

attended, including Union and Confederate Veterans. The entire

procession reached six miles. There were 53,500 participants, military

and civil, and 160 bands of music. At the same time, in majestic column

upon the Hudson, Great Britain, France, Italy, and Spain joined, with

men-of-war, our North Atlantic squadron, saluting the President as he

passed.

The exercises at the tomb were simple. Bishop Newman offered prayer.

"America" was sung. President McKinley delivered an address of eulogy.

General Horace Porter gave the mausoleum into the city's keeping, a

trust which Mayor Strong in a few words accepted.

History of the United States, Volume 5 · 第 11 / 19 章