CHAPTER III.

MR. HARRISON'S ADMINISTRATION.

The new President, of course, renounced his predecessor's policy upon

the tariff, but continued it touching the navy. He advocated steamship

subsidies, reform in electoral laws, and such amendment to the

immigration laws as would effectively exclude undesirable foreigners.

A chief effect of the Kearney movement in California, culminating in the

California constitution of 1879, was intense opposition throughout the

Pacific States to any further admission of the Chinese. The constitution

named forbade the employment of Chinese by the State or by any

corporation doing business therein. This hostility spread eastward, and,

in spite of interested capitalists and disinterested philanthropists,

shaped all Subsequent Chinese legislation in Congress. The pacific

spirit of the Burlingame treaty in 1868, shown also by President Hayes

in vetoing the Anti-Chinese bill of 1878, died out more and more.

[Illustration: Speaker exhorting a crowd.]

"The Chinese must go!"

Denis Kearney addressing the working-men on the night of October 29, on

Nob Hill, San Francisco.

A law passed in 1881 provided that Chinese immigration might be

regulated, limited, or suspended by the United States. A bill

prohibiting such immigration for twenty years was vetoed by President

Arthur, but another reducing the period to ten years became law in 1882.

In 1888 this was amended to prohibit the return of Chinese laborers who

had been in the United States but had left. In 1892 was passed the Geary

law re-enacting for ten years more the prohibitions then in force, only

making them more rigid. Substantially the same enactments were renewed

in 1902.

Mr. Harrison wished this policy of a closed state put in force against

Europe as well as against Asia. An act of Congress passed August 2,

1882, prohibited the landing from any country of any would-be immigrant

who was a convict, lunatic, idiot, or unable to take care of himself.

This law, like the supplementary one of March 3, 1887, proved

inadequate. In 1888 American consuls represented that transatlantic

steamship companies were employing unscrupulous brokers to procure

emigrants for America, the brokerage being from three to five dollars

per head, and that most emigrants were of a class utterly unfitted for

citizenship.

[Illustration: Portrait.]

Thomas B. Reed.

The President's urgency in this matter had little effect, the attention

of Congress being early diverted to other subjects. Three great measures

mainly embodied the Republican policy--the Federal Elections Bill, the

McKinley Tariff Bill, and the Dependent Pensions Bill.

As Speaker of the House, Hon. Thomas B. Reed, of Maine, put through

certain parliamentary innovations necessary to enact the party's will.

He declined to entertain dilatory motions. More important, he ordered

the clerk to register as "present and not voting," those whom he saw

endeavoring by stubborn silence to break a quorum. A majority being the

constitutional quorum, theretofore, unless a majority answered to their

names upon roll-call, no majority appeared of record, although the

sergeant-at-arms was empowered to compel the presence of every member.

As the traditional safeguard of minorities and as a compressed airbrake

on majority action, silence became more powerful than words. Under the

Reed theory, since adopted, that the House may, through its Speaker,

determine in its own way the presence of a quorum, the Speaker's or the

clerk's eye was substituted for the voice of any member in demonstrating

such member's presence.

Many, not all Democrats, opposed the Reed policy as arbitrary. Mr.

Evarts is said to have remarked, "Reed, you seem to think a deliberative

body like a woman; if it deliberates, it is lost." On the "yeas and

nays" or at any roll-call some would dodge out of sight, others break

for the doors only to find them closed. A Texas member kicked down a

door to make good his escape. Yet, having calculated the scope of his

authority, Mr. Reed coolly continued to count and declare quorums

whenever such were present. The Democratic majority of 1893 transferred

this newly discovered prerogative of the Speaker, where possible, to

tellers. Now and then they employed it as artillery to fire at Mr. Reed

himself, but he each time received the shot with smiles.

The cause for which the counting of quorums was invoked made it doubly

odious to Democratic members. To restore the suffrage to southern

negroes the Republicans proposed federal supervision of federal

elections. This suggestion of a "Force Bill" rekindled sectional

bitterness. One State refused to be represented at the World's Columbian

Exposition of 1893, a United States marshal was murdered in Florida, a

Grand Army Post was mobbed at Whitesville, Ky. Parts of the South

proposed a boycott on northern goods. Many at the North favored white

domination in the South rather than a return of the carpet-bag regime,

regarding the situation a just retribution for Republicans' highhanded

procedure in enfranchising black ignorance. Sober Republicans foresaw

that a force law would not break up the solid South, but perpetuate it.

The House, however, passed the bill. In the Senate it was killed only by

"filibuster" tactics, free silver Republican members joining members

from the South to prevent the adoption of cloture.

A Treasury surplus of about $97,000,000 (in October, 1888) tempted the

Fifty-first Congress to expenditures then deemed vast, though often

surpassed since. The Fifty-first became known as the "Billion Dollar

Congress." What drew most heavily upon the national strong-box was the

Dependent Pensions Act. In this culminated a course of legislation

repeating with similar results that which began early in the history of

our country, occasioning the adage that "The Revolutionary claimant

never dies." By 1820 the experiment entailed an expenditure of a little

over twenty-five cents per capita of our population.

In 1880 Congress was induced to endow each pensioner with a back pension

equal to what his pension would have been had he applied on the date of

receiving his injury. Under the old law pension outlay had been at high

tide in 1871, standing then at $34,443,894. Seven years later it shrank

to $27,137,019. In 1883 it exceeded $66,000,000; in 1889 it approached

$88,000,000. But the act of 1890, similar to one vetoed by President

Cleveland three years before, carried the pension figure to $106,493,000

in 1890, to $118,584,000 in 1891, and to about $159,000,000 in 1893. It

offered pensions to all soldiers and sailors incapacitated for manual

labor who had served the Union ninety days, or, if they were dead, to

their widows, children, or dependent parents. 311,567 pension

certificates were issued during the fiscal year 1891-1892.

While thus increasing outgo, the Fifty-first Congress planned to

diminish income, not by lowering tariff rates, as the last

Administration had recommended, but by pushing them up to or toward the

prohibitive point. The McKinley Act, passed October 1, 1890, made sugar,

a lucrative revenue article, free, and gave a bounty to sugar producers

in this country, together with a discriminating duty of one-tenth of a

cent per pound on sugar imported hither from countries which paid an

export bounty thereon.

The "Blaine" reciprocity feature of this act proved its most popular

grace. In 1891 we entered into reciprocity agreements with Brazil, with

the Dominican Republic, and with Spain for Cuba and Porto Rico. In 1892

we covenanted similarly with the United Kingdom on behalf of the British

West Indies and British Guiana, and with Nicaragua, Salvador, Honduras,

Guatemala and Austria-Hungary. How far our trade was thus benefited is

matter of controversy. Imports from these countries were certainly much

enlarged. Our exportation of flour to these lands increased a result

commonly ascribed to reciprocity, though the simultaneous increase in

the amounts of flour we sent to other countries was a third more rapid.

The international copyright law, meeting favor with the literary, was

among the most conspicuous enactments of the Fifty-first Congress. An

international copyright treaty had been entered into in 1886, but it did

not include the United States. Two years later a bill to the same end

failed in Congress. At last, on March 3, 1891, President Harrison signed

an act which provided for United States copyright for any foreign

author, designer, artist, or dramatist, albeit the two copies of a book,

photograph, chromo, or lithograph required to be deposited with the

Librarian of Congress must be printed from type set within the limits of

the United States or from plates made therefrom, or from negatives or

drawings on stone made within the limits of the United States or from

transfers therefrom. Foreign authors, like native or naturalized, could

renew their United States copyrights, and penalties were prescribed to

protect these rights from infringement.

Mr. Blaine, the most eminent Republican statesman surviving, was now

less conspicuous than McKinley, Lodge, and Reed, with whom, by his

opposition to extreme protection and to the Force Bill, he stood at

sharp variance. As Secretary of State, however, to which post President

Harrison had perforce assigned him, he still drew public attention,

having to deal with several awkward international complications.

[Illustration: Portrait.]

David C. Hennessy.

The city of New Orleans, often tempted to appeal from bad law to

anarchy, was in the spring of 1891 swept off its feet by such a

temptation. Chief of Police David C. Hennessy was one night ambushed and

shot to death near his home by members of the Sicilian "Mafia," a

secret, oath-bound body of murderous blackmailers whom he was hunting to

earth. When at the trial of the culprits the jury, in face of cogent

evidence, acquitted six and disagreed as to the rest, red fury succeeded

white amazement. A huge mob encircled the jail, crushed in its

barricaded doors, and shot or hung the trembling Italians within.

[Illustration: Mob breaking into a prison.]

An episode of the lynching of the Italians in New Orleans. The citizens

breaking down the door of the parish prison with the beam brought there

the night before for that purpose.

[Illustration: Three story building.]

Old Parish Jail, New Orleans, La.

[Illustration: Downtown street, three and fours story buildings,

streetcars.]

Canal Street, New Orleans La.

Italy forthwith sent her protest to Mr. Blaine, who expressed his horror

at the deed, and urged Governor Nicholls to see the guilty brought to

justice. The Italian consul at New Orleans averred that, while the

victims included bad men, many of the charges against them were without

foundation; that the violence was foreseen and avoidable; that he had in

vain besought military protection for the prisoners, and had himself,

with his secretary, been assaulted and mobbed.

The Marquis di Rudini insisted on indemnity for the murdered men's

families and on the instant punishment of the assassins. Secretary

Blaine, not refusing indemnity in this instance, denied the right to

demand the same, still more the propriety of insisting upon the instant

punishment of the offenders, since the utmost that could be done at once

was to institute judicial proceedings, which was the exclusive function

of the State of Louisiana. The Italian public thought this equivocation,

mean truckling to the American prejudice against Italians. Baron Fava,

Italian Minister at Washington, was ordered to "affirm the inutility of

his presence near a government that had no power to guarantee such

justice as in Italy is administered equally in favor of citizens of all

nationalities." "I do not," replied Mr. Blaine, "recognize the right of

any government to tell the United States what it shall do; we have never

received orders from any foreign power and shall not begin now. It is to

me," he said, "a matter of indifference what persons in Italy think of

our institutions. I cannot change them, still less violate them."

[Illustration: Portrait.]

A. G. Thurman.

Such judicial proceedings as could be had against the lynchers broke

down completely. The Italian Minister withdrew, but his government

finally accepted $25,000 indemnity for the murdered men's families.

Friction with Chile arose from the "Itata incident." Chile was torn by

civil war between adherents of President Balmaceda and the

"congressional party." Mr. Egan, American Minister at Santiago, rendered

himself widely unpopular among Chilians by his espousal of the

President's cause. The Itata, a cruiser in the congressionalist service,

was on May 6, 1891, at Egan's request, seized at San Diego, Cal., by the

federal authorities, on the ground that she was about to carry a cargo

of arms to the revolutionists. Escaping, she surrendered at her will to

the United States squadron at Iquique. The congressionalists resented

our interference; the Balmaceda party were angry that we interfered to

so little effect. A Valparaiso mob killed two American sailors and hurt

eighteen more. Chile, however, tendered a satisfactory indemnity.

[Illustration: Ship with two masts and one smokestack.]

Chilian steamer Itata in San Diego Harbor.

In the so-called "Barrundia incident" occurring in 1890 Americanism

overshot itself. The Guatemalan refugee, General Barrundia, boarded the

Pacific Mail steamer Acapulco for Salvador upon assurance that he would

not be delivered to the authorities of his native land. At San Jose de

Guatemala the Guatemala authorities sought to arrest him, and United

States Minister Mizner, Consul-General Hosmer, and Commander Reiter of

the United States Ship of War Ranger, concurred in advising Captain

Pitts of the Acapulco that Guatemala had a right to do this. Barrundia

resisted arrest and was killed. Both Mizner and Reiter were reprimanded

and removed, Reiter being, however, placed in another command.

Our government's attitude in this matter was untenable. The two

officials were in fact punished for having acted with admirable judgment

and done each his exact duty.

One of President Harrison's earliest diplomatic acts was the treaty of

1889 with Great Britain and Germany, by which, in conjunction with those

nations, the United States established a joint protectorate over the

Samoan Islands. On December 2, 1899, the three powers named agreed to a

new treaty, by which the United States assumed full sovereignty over

Tutuila and all the other Samoan islands east of longitude 171 degrees

west from Greenwich, renouncing in favor of the other signatories all

rights and claims over the remainder of the group.

In the congressional campaign of 1890 issue was squarely joined upon the

neo-Republican policy. The billion dollars gone, the Force Bill, and,

to a less extent, the McKinley tariff, especially its sugar bounty, had

aroused popular resentment. The election, an unprecedented "landslide,"

precipitated a huge Democratic majority into the House of

Representatives. Every community east of the Pacific slope felt the

movement. Pennsylvania elected a Democratic governor.

[Illustration: Rowboat with sixteen men leaving a ship.]

President Harrison being rowed ashore at foot of Wall Street,

New York, April 29, 1889.

History of the United States, Volume 5 · 第 3 / 19 章