King James I

It would be easier to say what was not the matter with this walking

pathological museum than to name his actual disease. From early youth

till death his life was one long pain. He could hardly walk until

he was nearly six years old, and this defect was attributed by his

physician, Sir Theodore Mayerne, to the bad milk of a drunken wet-nurse.

Mayerne,[11] who left a full account of James’s health, seems to have

been an acute man, but nowadays we should rather attribute the somewhat

neurotic troubles from which James suffered to his unconscious infantile

disgust at the drunken woman than to the influence of her bad milk.

He himself certainly did not use milk as his drink when he came to years

of “discretion.” He was afflicted with the normal gigantic appetite of

kings in those days. He ate anything and everything so long as it could

be eaten: not even Charles V could have excelled his prowess. He drank,

indiscriminately, beer, spirits, Spanish wines, cider, sweet French

wines, and muscatel, probably mixing them all right royally. His interior

organs were always too full, and he got rid of the vast surplus in

whatever disgusting way, up or down, happened to be convenient, so, in

every way, he must have been a most unpleasant companion.

He was subject to catarrh, and was much affected by cold and damp; he

was constantly spitting, hawking, and blowing his nose. As handkerchiefs

were not then in general use, I have heard that he used his sleeve or

his finger and thumb, which would not add to his “clubability.” He

had some difficulty in swallowing, owing, as Sir Theodore puts it, to

some narrowing of his fauces, inherited from his mother, Mary Queen

of Scots, and from his grandfather, James V of Scotland. Putting two

and two together, the constant blowing of his nose and the “narrowing”

of his throat, one imagines that probably the poor man suffered from

adenoids and enlarged tonsils. He occasionally suffered from gravel,

often accompanied by blood. He constantly suffered from another ignoble

trouble, which in the course of years bled copiously. If he was specially

worried in mind or body—and a king is always worried—he would become

jaundiced. Whenever anything more than usually alarming occurred, the

unhappy man would get diarrhœa, just like an anxious student awaiting his

interview with the examiners. He used faithfully to insist on his being

bled every day, until his least dignified ailment saved the doctors the

trouble. When he dismissed his Parliament of 1610 apparently his diarrhœa

became profuse. In fact, if you can think of any ailment that I have

not mentioned from which he suffered—so be it that it was excessively

undignified—I wish you would tell me what it was.

He had a truly psychasthenic dread of pain, yet hated all doctors,

possibly because he had suffered too much at our hands. His teeth

were all decayed, so that he could chew nothing, but had perforce to

bolt his food. A man with the decayed teeth that so distinguished the

“most learned fool in Christendom” would naturally in time suffer from

arthritis; and in middle age this complaint so crippled him that he could

hardly mount his horse. He detested purgatives, and considered that

any medicine, to do good, must act upon the bowels without griping the

patient; till late in his life he would not even allow an enema, probably

because it hurt him.

With death came, as usual, a little of that dignity that was so sadly

lacking in his life. S. R. Gardiner says that he died of a fever, but it

is impossible even to guess at its nature. Early in the morning of March

27th, 1625, he was so ill that he had to send for his son Prince Charles,

who came running into the king’s room in a nightshirt. Seeing his son,

King James tried to raise himself on his pillows and to say something;

but his voice had become so weak as to be inaudible, so that even then

he failed. He was understood to say “Veni, Domine Jesu,” and soon his

breathing ceased; in fact, like most people, he passed painlessly into

the sleep that knows no waking. He had done with all his pain and

constant discomfort, and, so far as he knew, with the misunderstanding

that afflicted him in his life in England and has certainly afflicted his

memory ever since. Poor James did not have a chance from his infancy. It

has been said that he failed because he did not understand the English

people; but how could you expect him to do that when he was constantly

worried by the most distressing and undignified of all ailments? And was

it not also equally their duty to try to understand him?

They held a post-mortem examination upon him, because there were the

usual accusations of poisoning, apparently founded largely upon the

swelling of his tongue. They found that his heart was enormously

enlarged, and that in his left kidney, which was greatly shrunken, there

reposed two stones, from which doubtless had come that gravel which had

so afflicted him during his life. Possibly his enlarged heart and swollen

tongue, together with his vast overeating and drinking, may have meant

that King James I had chronic Bright’s disease.

How far the drunken wet-nurse may have influenced his later life no

one can say; but it is quite possible that the unconscious infant may

have felt a disgust that went far to cause that nervousness and lack

of dignity of which his subjects complained. But how could any man be

dignified when he was suffering constantly from gravel and the other

tormenting, itching, weakening, and ignoble trouble?

But surely we have omitted the most important point in James’s supposed

character: the unnatural offences of which he was suspected. Well, Sir

Theodore Mayerne, who has told us so frankly all about his hawking

and spitting, his diarrhœa, his gravel, his stones, and his bleeding

hæmorrhoids, does not seem to know anything about the unnatural offences.

The pure mind always seems to turn towards this sort of offence when it

thinks of its neighbour. In 1642, according to the _American Mercury_ of

April, 1924, the Puritans, hardly settled down in the American colonies,

were already accusing each other of the most awful sexual offences. And

before convicting James of such offences one would prefer the evidence of

a level-headed doctor to that of all the seventeenth-century Puritans in

the world.

It is strange how minds, under the influence of fierce religious fervour,

always turn, and always have turned, to unnatural sexual offences. It

is not a product of patristic Christianity, as so many have thought.

On reading _The Golden Ass_, of Apuleius, one must be struck with the

amazing moral filth of the Roman Empire. After wading through hundreds

of pages of gay and libidinous dirt, one suddenly finds that one is

assisting in religious propaganda. Apuleius paints his fellow-countrymen

and women in such black colours simply because he wants them to join in

the worship of the Great Mother, which was then so formidable a rival to

Christianity in the Roman Empire.

So, considering the known facts of religious propaganda, I do not believe

a single word of the slanders upon James I. There were Puritans about.

It is possible that Petronius, in his _Satyricon_—if he wrote it—drew a

truthful picture of the Empire under Nero, because he does not profess to

moralise or to convert anybody whatever to any supposed better religion.

One is sometimes inclined to agree with Gibbon that “all (_organised_)

religions are equally false and equally useful.”

But it would be absurd to suppose that James the Sixth and First was

merely the ridiculous creature that I have depicted here. Those who wish

to prove that he was a coward have first to account for the known fact

that, until his knees stiffened under the influence of his decayed teeth,

he was a brave and first-class horseman. It may be true that he could

never bear the sight of a drawn sword; neither could Lord Roberts bear

the sight of a cat. Before he was dragged to England he did for Scotland

what the heavy-handed Tudors did for South Britain. By his skill and

diplomacy he welded even fierce little Scotland into an orderly country,

and taught the Scots lords and the ministers of the General Assembly that

the king was their master.

Mere mortals · 第 34 / 44 题