ADJECTIVES.

The verb is the primitive part of speech in American tongues. To the

aboriginal man every person and object presents itself as either doing

or suffering something, every quality and attribute as something which

is taking place or existing. His philosophy is that of the extreme

idealists or the extreme materialists, who alike maintain that nothing

_is_, beyond the cognizance of our senses. Therefore his adjectives are

all verbal participles, indicating a state of existence. Thus _üssatu_

good, is from _üssân_ to be good, and means the condition of being good,

a good woman or thing, _üssati_ a good man.

Some adjectives, principally those from present participles, have the

masculine and neuter terminations _i_ and _u_ in the singular, and in

the plural _i_ for both genders. Adjectives from the past participles

end in the singular in _issia_ or _üssia_, in the plural in _annu_. When

the masculine ends in _illi_, the neuter takes _urru_, as _wadikilli_,

_wadikurru_, long.

Comparison is expressed by adding _bén_ or _kén_ or _adin_ (a verb

meaning to be above) for the comparative, and _apüdi_ for the

diminutive. _Ubura_, from the verb _uburau_ to be before in time, and

_adiki_, from _adikin_ to be after in time, are also used for the same

purpose. The superlative has to be expressed by a circumlocution; as

_tumaqua aditu ipirrun turreha_, what is great beyond all else;

_bokkia üssá dáuria_, thou art better than I, where the last word is a

compound of _dai uwúria_ of, from, than. The comparative degree of the

adjectives corresponds to the intensive and frequentative forms of the

verbs; thus _ipirrun_ to be strong, _ipirru_ strong, _ipirrubîn_ and

_ipirrubessabun_ to be stronger, _ipirrubetu_ and _ipirrubessabutu_

stronger, that which is stronger.

The numerals are wonderfully simple, and well illustrate how the

primitive man began his arithmetic. They are:--

1 abba.

2 biama, plural biamannu.

3 kabbuhin, plural kubbuhinínnu.

4 bibiti, plural bibitinu.

5 abbatekkábe, plural abbatekabbunu.

6 abbatiman, plural abbatimannínu.

7 biamattiman, plural biamattimannínu.

8 kabbuhintiman, plural kabbuhintimannínu.

9 bibitiman, plural bibititumannínu.

10 biamantekábbe, plural biamantekábunu.

Now if we analyze these words, we discover that _abbatekkábe_ five, is

simply _abba_ one, and _akkabu_, hand; that the word for six is

literally "one [finger] of the other [hand]," for seven "two [fingers]

of the other [hand]," and so on to ten, which is compounded of _biama_

two, and _akkabu_ hands. Would they count eleven, they say _abba

kutihibena_ one [toe] from the feet, and for twenty the expression is

_abba lukku_ one man, both hands and feet. Thus, in truth, they have

only four numerals, and it is even a question whether these are

primitive, for _kabbuhin_ seems a strengthened form of _abba_, and

_bibuti_ to bear the same relation to _biama_. Therefore we may look

back to a time when this nation knew not how to express any numbers

beyond one and two.

Although these numbers do not take peculiar terminations when applied to

different objects, as in the languages of Central America and Mexico,

they have a great variety of forms to express the relationship in which

they are used. The ordinals are:

atenennuati, first.

ibiamattéti, second.

wakábbuhinteti, our third, etc.

To the question, How many at a time? the answer is:

likinnekewai, one alone.

biamanuman, two at a time, etc.

If simply, How many? it is:

abbahu, one.

biamahu, two.

If, For which time? it is:

tibíakuja, for the first time.

tibíamattétu, for the second time.

and so on.

The Arawack Language of Guiana in its Linguistic and Ethnological Relations · 第 12 / 29 题