CHAP. XXI.

The Death of _Hypatia_ brought an Infamy on _Cyril_ and the Christian

Church: She was no Catholick, but a Heathen.

Thus ended the Life of _Hypatia_, whose Memory will ever last, and whose

Murder happen’d in the fourth Year of _Cyril_’s Episcopate, _Honorius_

being the tenth Time and _Theodosius_ the sixth Time Consuls, in the

Month of _March_, in the Time of _Lent_, and in the Year 415. “That

Action (says _Socrates_) brought no small Infamy not only upon _Cyril_,

but also upon the whole Church of _Alexandria_; for Slaughters, and

Fightings, and such like Things, are quite foreign to the Christian

Institution.” There’s nothing surer, there’s nothing truer; but of

genuine Christianity there remain’d very little at that Time, unless

Christianity be made to consist in the bare Name and Profession; for,

were I disposed to take this Trouble upon me, I should think it no

difficult Task to shew, that neither the Doctrines nor Distinctions then

in Vogue were ever taught by _Christ_ or his Apostles; and that the

Ceremonies injoined or practised were all utterly unknown to them. No,

no, they were no Christians that kill’d _Hypatia_; nor are any Christian

Clergymen now to be attack’d through the Sides of her Murderers, but

those that resemble them; by substituting precarious Traditions,

scholastick Fictions, and an usurped Dominion, to the salutiferous

Institution of the holy _Jesus_. _Photius_ is very angry with

_Philostorgius_, whom he stigmatizes as an _impious Man_, for saying

that the _Homoousians_, or the _Athanasian Trinitarians, tore her to

Pieces_; but is he not an _impudent Man_, or something worse, that dares

to deny this? when none were more remarkable Sticklers for the

_Homoousian_, than _Cyril_ and his Adherents. This only the Truth of

History requires to be specially noted; for with me the _Homoiousion_

and the _Homoousion_ are of no Account, in Comparison of the _Bible_,

where neither of them are to be found. In the mean Time ’twill not be

amiss to hear _Gothofred_ on this Occasion. “Observe here (says he) the

_Arian_ Poison of _Philostorgius_ against the _Homoousians_, or

Catholicks; as if the Murder of _Hypatia_ were the Crime of the

Catholicks, and not of the indiscrete Populace. Thus much however may be

gathered from this Passage, that this same _Hypatia_ was no Catholick.”

Admirable _Gothofred_! Not to say any thing to your _Arian_ Poison, for

which I am not a whit concern’d neither of the People’s Guilt, whom I

have sufficiently clear’d before; nor yet of the nice Distinction

between the Populace and the Catholicks, as if the Bulk of the

Catholicks were not the Populace: Your Conclusion that _Hypatia_ was not

a Catholick is unspeakably acute, when in Reality she was not as much as

a Christian; her Father having been a Heathen Philosopher, and herself

the Wife of one, without the least Appearance that she was ever any

other with regard to her own Persuasion. As for a ridiculous Letter,

pretended to be written by her to _Cyril_, about the Paschal Cycle, ’tis

a manifest Forgery; for she was murdered the sixth Year of _Theodosius_,

and therefore one and twenty Years before the Exile of _Nestorius_, who

yet is mention’d in that Letter under the Epithet of _impious_.

Hypatia or, The history of a most beautiful, most vertuous, most learned, and every way accomplish'd lady; who was torn to pieces by the clergy of Alexandria, to gratify the pride, emulation, and cruelty of their archbishop, commonly but undeservedly styled St. Cyril · 第 21 / 23 题