CHAPTER IV.

CONDITIONS TO BE OBSERVED BEFORE AND AFTER EATING.

General laws of organic activity apply to the stomach as well

as to other parts--Increased flow of blood towards the stomach

during digestion--Hence less circulating in other organs--And

consequently less aptitude for exertion in them--Bodily rest

and mental tranquillity essential to sound digestion--Rest

always attended to before feeding horses--Hence also a natural

aversion to exertion immediately after eating--Mischief done by

hurrying away to business after meals--Severe thinking hurtful

at that time--Playful cheerfulness after dinner conducive to

digestion--The mind often the cause of indigestion--Its mode of

operation explained--Also influences nutrition--Illustration

from Shakspeare.--Importance of attending to this condition of

health enforced.

Having now discussed the principles by which the number, quantity, and

quality of our meals ought to be regulated, we have next to consider

the conditions required for the healthy performance of digestion after

the aliment has reached the stomach, and to deduce from them such

practical rules as shall tend to facilitate the accomplishment of the

process.

Among the circumstances which favour digestion, _the observance of

bodily rest and mental tranquillity for some time before and after

every meal_, is perhaps the most important; its influence depends on

a well-known law of the animal economy, already frequently alluded to,

but to which, that it may be fully understood, I must again shortly

refer.

Whenever any living part is called into vivid action, an increased flow

of blood and of nervous energy towards it immediately commences, to

enable it to sustain the requisite degree of excitement, and continues

till some time after the activity has ceased. In accordance with this

law, whenever food is swallowed, the lining membrane of the stomach

becomes suffused with blood, and, owing to the greater distention of

its vessels, its colour changes from a pale pink to a deep red hue.

After digestion is completed, and the unusual supply of blood is no

longer required, the vessels again diminish, and the colour returns

to its original tint. In St Martin’s stomach, these changes were so

often seen by Dr Beaumont, as to render their occurrence as fully

demonstrated as any circumstance with which we are acquainted. Even

had they never been seen, the simple examination of the structure of

the stomach would lead us directly to the inference that it receives

an additional supply of blood when engaged in digestion; for the very

act of its distention by food renders the course of its bloodvessels

less tortuous, and the flow of blood through them consequently more

easy and rapid. In the case of the stomach, indeed, the increased

circulation is doubly required; not only as in other parts to enable

it to act with greater vigour, but also to supply the very copious

secretion of gastric and mucous fluids necessary for digestion, and

which we have seen to commence the moment food touches the mucous

coat. The quantity of gastric juice actually secreted at each meal

cannot easily be determined; but as more than an equal weight of it

is required for the solution of food out of the stomach, its amount

must be very considerable. Indeed we know that, on one occasion, when

St Martin dined on broiled mutton and bread without any liquids, the

gastric secretion was so copious, that half an hour afterwards the

“stomach was as full of fluids as when he drank a pint immediately

after eating;”[55] and, as the whole of this must have been derived

directly from the blood circulating through the vessels of the stomach,

they must necessarily have received a very large supply to enable them

to furnish it.

It is obvious, however, that the great afflux of blood which takes

place towards the stomach and intestines during digestion, cannot

occur without a corresponding diminution in the quantity circulating

on the surface and in other distant parts of the body, attended of

course with a diminished power of action in them. Hence, for some time

after a full meal, there is an inaptitude for vigorous thinking and

bodily exertion, a depression of respiration, and, in delicate persons,

a degree of coldness or chill felt over the whole body. But, under

ordinary circumstances, this depression is not of long continuance.

After the requisite secretions have been provided for the solution of

the food and the formation of the chyle, a reaction and change in the

distribution of the blood, now partially renewed by the admixture of

nutritive chyle, ensue, and, by the stimulus which they afford, soon

fit the person for the active resumption of his ordinary duties.

That this impaired activity of the other functions after a full meal

is natural, and intentionally arranged by the Creator, is plain, both

from its universality among all kinds of animals, and from the mode

in which it is produced. Among the lower creatures, the sluggishness

induced by eating increases in proportion to the degree in which they

gorge themselves with food. The boa constrictor, after a plentiful

repast, slumbers for a week; and the glutton of our own species, in

similar circumstances, drops into a stertorous sleep of several hours.

If active exertion immediately after a full meal be rendered compulsory

by any external cause, such as the presence of danger urging to flight,

the aliment often remains for hours in the stomach undigested. Again,

the very distention of the stomach inseparable from a hearty meal,

_necessarily_ impairs the activity of several of the functions,

by directly pressing upon the vessels which supply their organs with

blood, and consequently diminishing the stimulus essential to their

activity.

The obvious practical inference to be deduced from a consideration of

the principle under discussion is, that rest of body and tranquillity

of mind for a short time both before and after eating are necessary,

and conducive to healthy digestion. If we have been engaged in severe

and fatiguing bodily exertion, or anxious meditation, just before

sitting down to a meal, the blood which was flowing copiously through

the vessels of the muscles or the brain to keep up their unusual

action, still continues to do so, because a sufficient interval has not

elapsed to allow the excitement to subside, and a new distribution to

take place towards the organs concerned in digestion. The consequence

is, that the stomach does not receive blood enough to carry on its

increased action, and furnish gastric juice with sufficient rapidity,

or in sufficient quantity, to mix with the whole of the food; and that

the nervous energy, already partially exhausted by over-excitement

in the remoter organs, is imperfectly supplied to the stomach, the

tone and action of which are thus so far impaired as to render it no

longer able to carry on digestion with its usual success. Accordingly,

when we are fatigued with mental or bodily labour, we are naturally

impelled to seek repose before sitting down to table; and if we yield

to this instinctive prompting, and refresh ourselves by a rest, we not

only enjoy better what we eat, but also digest it with an ease and

comfort unattainable by swallowing our food the moment our labour is

at an end--and hence the wisdom and advantage of appropriating half an

hour to any light occupation, such as dressing, before sitting down

to dinner. If, however, we have previously been engaged only in very

moderate exercise, an interval of repose is not required, because then

there is no undue excitement elsewhere to retard the necessary flow of

blood and nervous energy towards the internal organs.

The practical rule of avoiding serious exertion of mind or body

immediately after eating, which is directly deducible from the

physiological law above explained, has long been acted upon in our

treatment of the lower animals; and no one who sets any value on the

lives of his horses or dogs, ever allows it to be disregarded with

respect to them. And yet the same man who would unhesitatingly dismiss

his groom for feeding his horse immediately after a fatiguing chace

or a gallop home, would probably think nothing of walking into the

house and ordering dinner to be instantly served for himself in similar

circumstances. In the army, the difficulty of managing recruits on a

march, in this respect, has often been remarked. Fatigued with the

day’s exertions, they are impatient for food, and, when they get it,

can scarcely refrain so long from devouring it as to admit of its

being even moderately cooked. They consequently labour under the

double disadvantage of eating before the system is in a sufficient

state of repose to benefit by the supply, and of having the food

itself in a condition unfit for easy digestion. The old campaigner,

on the other hand, instructed by former experience, restrains his

appetite, systematically kindles his fire, cooks his victuals, and

makes his arrangements for the night, with a coolness of deliberation

which surprises the recruit; and he is amply repaid for his temporary

self-denial, by the greater enjoyment and support which he derives from

the very same materials which the impatience of the other has caused

him in a great measure to waste.

Let any one who doubts the advantages resulting from attention to this

rule, consider for a moment its universal and scrupulous observance by

postmasters and jockies, and think whether these are persons likely

to throw away time and trouble on a useless ceremony. When a horse is

taken out of harness, an interval of repose is always allowed, that the

excitement of the system may have time to subside; and then not only

an eager appetite but an active digestion are sure to follow. Many a

valuable horse has been killed by being prematurely fed after fatiguing

exercise, and man himself is no exception to the rule. He not only

enjoys a meal with superior relish, but digests it better, when due

repose has removed the fatigue and excitement of exertion. Even after

continued activity of _mind_, a period of tranquillity or of

gentle bodily exercise is eminently conducive to the healthy action of

the stomach, precisely because it favours the new distribution of the

circulating blood which that process requires.

In accordance with this law of digestion, there is throughout the

whole animal creation a marked aversion to activity for some time

after a full meal, although man, eager in the pursuit of gain or the

gratification of other passions, often sets it at defiance, and engages

in bodily or mental labour both immediately before and after meals;

but, in return, he receives his reward for despising the authority

of Nature, in a severity of suffering from which the animals whom he

treats so much better than himself are by his care entirely exempted.

No where, for example, does man hurry off to business so immediately

as in the United States of America, and no where does he bolt his

food so much as if running a race against time. The consequence is,

that no where do intemperate eating and dyspepsia prevail to the same

enormous amount. Even in England, according to Dr Caldwell, the extent

of transgression cannot be compared with what is witnessed among our

Transatlantic brethren; and the result shews, that if we in Britain

suffer from indulging our fondness for good things, the comparatively

deliberate way in which we set about enjoying them serves as a partial

safeguard, and exempts us from a portion of the punishment which our

brethren bring down upon themselves, by the hurry with which they

first devour their food and then set off to work. Rapid eating almost

invariably leads to overloading the stomach; and when to this is added

a total disregard of the quietude necessary for digestion, what can be

expected to follow but inveterate dyspepsia?

The reason why wounds, bloodletting, bathing, and other circumstances

which tend to disturb the regularity of the circulation, are so

hurtful after a full meal, will now be apparent. The effect of wounds

and bloodletting is to give rise to an instantaneous change in the

distribution of the blood, and to deprive the stomach of that which is

now doubly required. Bathing, whether hot or cold, has an analogous

effect; and so, indeed, have all violent and sudden bodily or mental

shocks.

It must not, however, be imagined that the period of repose necessary

to insure healthy digestion extends over the whole time of the

continuance of food in the stomach. After a moderate meal and in

ordinary health, the concentration of the vital powers in that organ,

and their proportionate depression in other parts of the body,

rarely continue, at least in a very marked degree, beyond the period

usually allotted to the _siesta_, or sleep after dinner, in warm

climates, and even in Italy and Spain--namely, an hour or an hour and

a half. When the meal has not exceeded the bounds of moderation, _a

sufficient quantity of gastric juice for the digestion of the whole

is secreted generally within the first hour_; after which time,

consequently, the same quantity of blood is no longer required to be

directed towards the stomach, but may beneficially be distributed to

such other parts as from their activity more immediately require its

aid. If the muscular system is to be employed in labour or locomotion,

the blood can now be spared to sustain its activity; if the mind is

to be engaged in intellectual pursuits, it can be sent to the brain

without robbing the stomach. The same principle of course applies to

all the other organs; and it is therefore chiefly during the first

hour, till all the gastric juice be provided and the chymification of

the food be fairly commenced, that tranquillity of mind and inaction of

body are so essential.

As already mentioned, the reality of increased circulation in the

vessels of the stomach during digestion has been established by ocular

demonstration, as well as by analogy. The increase in the supply of

nervous energy which takes place at the same time is, however, scarcely

less certain, although from its nature incapable of being seen. It is

the almost characteristic feature of the nervous system to be excited

by stimulus to increased action; and we formerly saw that when the

nerves of the stomach are cut, and the flow of nervous influence is

arrested, digestion instantly suffers. But the same principle holds

in the nervous as in the circulating system. Energetic action cannot

be kept up in two distant parts of the body at the same time. If the

intellect be intently occupied in profound and absorbing thought, the

nervous energy will be concentrated in the brain, and any demands made

on it by the stomach or muscles will be very imperfectly attended to.

If, on the other hand, the stomach be actively engaged in digesting a

full meal, and some subject of thought be then presented to the mind,

considerable difficulty will be felt in pursuing it, and most probably

both thought and digestion will be disturbed. If the mental effort

required be easy and agreeable, and the meal be a very temperate one,

there will be much less difficulty in simultaneously proceeding with

both, because comparatively little nervous energy will then suffice

for them. Still, however, each will go on more efficiently if not

interfered with by the other.

When the mind is active and vigorous, and properly exercised in all

its departments of feeling and affection as well as of intellect, the

nervous influence which the brain produces is not only more abundant,

but of a more healthful and invigorating quality. Hence the well-known

preservative and restorative influence of cheerful dispositions and

gratified activity of mind, and hence the depressing, morbid, and

often fatal effects of corroding care, grief, and apprehension, on

every organ of the body. Hence, too, the weak digestion and sallow

complexions of literary men and hard students, who suffer severely from

transgressing this law of the animal economy by habitually engaging in

occupations requiring much exertion of mind, not only soon after, but

even during the very act of swallowing their meals. Ignorant of the

connexion subsisting between the different functions, and of their laws

of action, few can be convinced in time of the importance of observing

this condition, even after its operation has been explained to them.

In the conclusion, however, experience teaches many whose reason is

insufficient for their guidance, and forces them to a closer conformity

with the dictates of nature, when obedience is almost too late to be of

benefit.

The prodigious influence of the nervous system on digestion is

familiarly and unequivocally exhibited in almost every case of

dyspepsia which each succeeding day brings under the notice of the

physician. _He_ knows well from experience that the diet may be

selected with every care, its quantity duly proportioned, and exercise

rigidly practised, and yet all his curative treatment fail even to

relieve, unless his patient be at the same time freed from the pressure

of care, and due attention be devoted to the observance of mental and

bodily repose after every meal. The heavier the meal the greater is

the desire for absolute rest, and the less advantageously can active

exertion be encountered. When the stomach is loaded, the whole vital

energies seem to be concentrated in it to enable it to cope with the

task imposed upon it. But when we eat temperately, there is less

necessity for entire quietude of mind and body. Accordingly, if we do

not experience the same dislike to exertion after a light forenoon

lunch, which we do after a heavy late dinner, the reason is simply,

that less gastric juice, less nervous energy, and less vigorous action

in the stomach, are required to digest in the one case than in the

other.

Among operative manufacturers, who are much within doors, and who are

allowed only a few minutes for meals, indigestion is very prevalent.

Ordinary labourers are better treated in this respect, as they are

allowed one hour for breakfast and another for dinner. To most of them

the walk to and from their own houses is almost as good as, if not

better, than absolute rest, because it varies their position, is taken

leisurely, and costs no effort.

Those who are compelled by circumstances to active exertion

immediately after a meal, or whose minds are intently occupied in

thought or emotion, will find their only safety in eating less than

when differently situated. The stomach, having less labour imposed upon

it, will require less blood and less nervous energy, and consequently

less of both will be abstracted from the other organs which are also

in activity, and requiring their assistance. Travellers, literati, and

other actively engaged men, know this rule by experience, and some of

them have specially noticed its importance. Richard Cumberland, for

example, in speaking of his own habits, says: “Nature has given me

the hereditary blessing of a constitutional and habitual temperance,

that revolts against excess of any sort, and never suffers appetite

to load the frame. I am accordingly as fit to resume my book or my

pen the instant after my meal as I was in the freshest hours of the

morning.”[56] This compatibility of temperate eating with activity did

not escape the acute observation of Hippocrates.

The state of the mind, indeed, exerts a powerful influence not only

on the stomach, but on the whole process of nutrition, and greatly

modifies the quantity which may be safely eaten. If the mind be gay

and joyous, appetite will be comparatively keen, digestion effective

and rapid, and nutrition complete. Examples of this kind abound in

childhood, and among an easy-minded well-fed peasantry; whereas if

the mind be harassed by care and anxiety, or devoured by grief, envy,

jealousy, or other troubles and disquieting passions, the healthy calls

of appetite will be scarcely known, and digestion and nutrition will

be equally impaired, for it is literally true that “indigestion or, to

use the term of the day, a _Bilious attack, as often arises from over

exertion or_ ANXIETY OF MIND, as from refractory food.”[57]

This fact is exemplified on a large scale in every commercial country,

and especially in times of _public distress_ and _political

change_. Shakspeare obviously had the principle in view when he made

Cæsar exclaim:

“Let me have men about me that are _fat_,

_Sleek-headed men_, and such as sleep o’ nights.

Yond’ Cassius has _a lean and hungry look_;

_He thinks too much_: such men are dangerous.

_Antony._ Fear him not, Cæsar, he’s not dangerous;

He is a noble Roman, and well given.

_Cæsar._ _Would he were fatter_:--But I fear him not:

Yet if my name were liable to fear

I do not know the man I should avoid

So soon as that spare Cassius.--He reads much.

He is a great observer, and he looks

Quite through the deeds of men; _he loves no plays_

As thou dost, Antony; he hears no music,

Seldom he smiles, and smiles in such a sort

As if he mocked himself, and scorned his spirit

That could be moved to smile at any thing.

Such men as he be never at heart’s ease

Whiles they behold a greater than themselves,

And therefore are they very dangerous.”

Even experience must have taught every one with what zest we sit down

to enjoy the pleasures of the table, and how largely we incline to eat,

when the mind is free, unburdened, and joyous, compared with the little

attention we bestow on our meals when we are overwhelmed with anxiety,

or have the whole energies of the mind concentrated on some important

scheme. There cannot be a doubt, indeed, that the over-exertion and

excitement, or absolute inertness, of mind, in which sedentary people

are generally immersed, contributes greatly, along with the want of

muscular exercise in the open air, to impair the tone of the digestive

organs. In this way, as it is not less justly than forcibly remarked

by Dr Caldwell, “dyspepsia _commences_ perhaps as often in the

brain as in the stomach. Possibly oftener. That this is true of the

disease in Europe will scarcely be denied, after a fair examination of

the facts connected with it. It is there almost exclusively a complaint

of the studious and the scheming, who, over-tasking their brains,

injure them by toil. Among the husbandmen of England, who steadily

pursue their tranquil mode of life, regardless of the fluctuations of

stock, the bickerings of party, the fate of political measures, and

the changes of place, dyspepsia is almost a stranger.” “In the cities,

the same is in a great measure true of merchants, manufacturers, and

mechanics, who are engaged in a regular and well established business,

which is fully understood by them, where the risk is slight and the

profits sure, and no disquieting anxiety attends it. Such individuals

have a good digestion, and bear the marks of it. But with literary men,

officers of state, dealers in scrip, daring adventurers, and anxious

and ambitious projectors of improvements, with these and every other

brain-worn class of persons, the case is different. Dyspepsia is their

torment, and they exhibit deep traces of it in their lean frames and

hagard countenances. Yet are they much more select in their diet,

both as respects quantity, quality, and cooking, than the classes to

whom dyspepsia is unknown. This fact is notorious, and has been so for

centuries. Nor can it be attributed, I think, to any other cause but

excessive and deleterious cerebral irritation in the one case, and an

exemption from it in the other; and this cause seems sufficient to

solve the problem.”[58]

In denouncing active exertion of mind or body immediately after

eating, as inimical to digestion, it is not meant that we should go

to sleep, or indulge in absolute listlessness. A weak constitution

may require something like complete repose, but a person in ordinary

health may indulge in a leisurely saunter or pleasant conversation

not only without injury but with positive benefit; and perhaps there

is no situation in which digestion goes on so favourably as during

the cheerful play of sentiment in the after-dinner small-talk of a

well-assorted circle. The nervous stimulus sent to the stomach is

then of the most healthful and invigorating description, and ever the

dyspeptic, if on his guard against a heavy meal, forgets his woes

amidst the unwonted vigour of his functions.

It is true that thousands who habitually neglect the observance of

the condition here adverted to, continue to live and digest for years

without appearing to suffer much from their conduct. But it is not

less true that there are many more who bring wretchedness and disease

upon themselves and their offspring, in the vain attempt to counteract

the intentions of Nature, and that there are comparatively few even

of the former so happily constituted as to escape entirely unscathed.

Most frequently the evil consequences are only accumulating, and when

they are summed up at the end of years, the victim finds himself more

severely punished than he had ever expected to be. In this respect,

the consequence resembles that arising from breathing in a vitiated

atmosphere. The effect may not be perceptible for a time; but if God

has ordained a pure air to be best adapted for respiration, we have the

infallible authority of His omniscience for believing that one which

is vitiated _must_ be less wholesome, although His beneficence

has so constituted us, that the injury resulting from it is gradual

in its infliction, for the very purpose of giving us time to escape.

In like manner, if bodily and mental relaxation are favourable to

digestion, we have the same infallible guarantee that every departure

from them _must_ be in so far hurtful, however slowly the effect

may develope itself.

The physiology of digestion considered with relation to the principles of dietetics · 第 4 / 6 章