ADDRESS OF MR. CUMMINGS, OF NEW YORK.

Mr. SPEAKER: Great as is our country, its history is comparatively

brief. Though brief, it is exceedingly instructive. So far as there can

be an outcome in ever-recurring events, it is the outcome of a

tremendous social and political struggle. Sir, it hardly suits the

occasion to refer to the origin of this struggle or to trace its

progress, but the effort for popular government is discernible through

many centuries. As we come nearer to our time it becomes more

intelligent and determined. Our great Declaration was its best

pronunciamento. Our written Constitution was its most concise

expression. The events that produced them founded a normal school for

patriotism. In it was perfected a new departure. Fealty to lord and king

was supplanted by fealty to human rights. Proclaimed in the council

chamber, these rights had to be won in the field. Yorktown completed our

first endeavor at nation-making; we graduated masters at Appomattox. The

first proclaimed the prowess of the Confederation, the second testified

to the strength of the Union. Both astonished the world. Both transpired

in Virginia.

Conspicuous in this analogue of our history were the Lees of Virginia.

They have a lineage too illustrious for praise. Its escutcheons are too

bright for adornment. It reaches back for centuries loyal to honor and

to truth. Him we mourn to-day was a gifted scion of that great name. His

highest distinction was won in Confederate arms.

Thank God, I can now speak of our civil war with satisfaction and not

with reluctance. I allude to it with a satisfaction akin to that one

feels in gazing upon a plain fertilized by an inundation. Flowers spring

up, birds sing, and golden grain nods in the sunlight. But our civil war

was more like an upheaval than like a deluge. It shook every timber in

the grand structure with which we had surprised the world. Other

governments have fallen of their own weight; our matchless edifice could

not be shattered by an explosion.

Both contestants stood guard over the popular principle and would not

let it be mined. They were instructed in the same school and by the same

teacher. Local privilege was as strong with the one as with the other.

The dispute was whether the Union should endure the strain of the race

and slavery issue. The long and vexing argument was adjourned to the

battlefield. In no other respect was our system even threatened. This

close connection at the root made the angry divergence begin to

assimilate at the very outset.

So kindred was it, that when Grant met his heroic opponent at Appomattox

he says that he fell into such a reunion with him that he had twice to

be reminded of the occasion that brought them together. He then

conformed to it, and treated those who surrendered not as conquered, but

as reclaimed. Lincoln went further. He found a Confederate legislature

ready-made to his hand, and promptly permitted it to repair the

situation. In thus mingling the gray with the blue he was neither

color-blind nor purblind. He knew what he was doing. He desired to

blend them, as emblematic of a more perfect Union. Possibly the

Confederate legislature suited his purpose best.

After this testimonial it looks to me something like treason to that

great name to try to exclude Confederate worth from the annals of the

strife or from the glory of its grand consummation. Neither act nor

actor can be profitably spared.

Mr. Speaker, the other day in this very Hall I laid a chaplet on the

bier of a dead comrade. To-day I am trying to commemorate the virtues of

a Confederate colleague. Both died while members of this House. That

both were my countrymen warms my heart. As my countrymen I can make no

invidious distinction. If living neither would permit it, and he is more

reckless than I who would profane the memory of either.

Mr. Speaker, I have said that I could speak of the civil war with

satisfaction and not with reluctance. The occasion prompted me to say

so. The occasion requires that, as a Union soldier, I should state my

reasons. We learn from experience, and war is the toughest kind of

experience. When it raised its horrid front and began its work of

seeming devastation, we shrank back from its terrible promise. The world

looked to see us dismembered; but the great Republic, like a daring

cruiser, emerged from the tempest sound from keel to truck. Not a brace

swung loose, not a plank was sprung, no spar was shivered. Within there

had to be readjustment. Aloft the Stars and Stripes rose and fell in

graceful recognition of the trial. The thunder of her broadsides

proclaimed the value of this object-lesson in nation-making.

We had learned a juster appreciation of ourselves as a whole people, and

if this were all, it was worth the tuition. But we had besides garnered

into our storehouse of knowledge vast consignments for the use of

liberal economic government. We had infused into our laws, our language,

and our institutions new vigor for conquest and for human enlightenment.

Venality, that dogs great efforts, undoubtedly there was. But the high

tide of the conflict showed no mercenary taint. On both sides it was

urged from the highest motives of patriotism and of honor and in defense

of the popular principle. That principle with us means local

self-government and representative union. The rebel yell was because

they thought local government in peril. The Federal huzza was for

representative union. Together they were cheering the same deeply

embedded sentiment.

Those who would study the phenomenon must remember that where opinions

approximate on parallel lines, but from some interest or sentiment

refuse to coalesce, the passions are liable to ignite. Fusion then takes

place in a terrible heat. The heat must be sufficient to remove the

obstacles that the mass may become unified. We have as a result a firmly

established representative union of local self-governments. The cooling

and finishing process has left no flaw. Sir, what sort of a soldier must

he be who is not proud of having been tempered in such a trial? If after

the unmatched tournament this is not the spirit of victor and

vanquished, then the lights of chivalry are burnt out and magnanimity is

no more.

Mr. Speaker, I know of no greater praise of a life than to say it was

one of honest endeavor. Whatever faculties comprise it, this is the

scope of human duty. When to this is added a conscience adequate to all

the suggestions of a great and busy career, the sum of human excellence

has been reached All this I believe in my soul can be truthfully said of

"ROONEY" LEE. "Rooney" was his father's term of endearment, which all

who knew him, without distinction of age, race, or sex, delighted to

apply to him when absent. When present, it was always "general." A

thorough soldier, there was an idyllic strain in his nature. He was

essentially rural in his tastes. He loved the wheat fields and tobacco

plantations of his native State. Its very air seemed to inspire him.

The Blue Ridge was to him the perfection of natural beauty. He was warm

in his friendships and true to his kinships. Always dignified, there was

a heartiness in his greetings that was irresistible. He was as broad as

his acres. Riding or driving over his vast estate or in its vicinity,

his cheerful halloo rang in the ears of those who had not seen him, and

the cheery swing of his hat, though paid to all, was a cherished

compliment. If the spirit of mortal be proud, it was not his spirit.

Courteous, sympathetic, unobtrusive, patriotic, knightly, and

beneficent, he was a part of the soil of Virginia itself. He had the

loving hospitality that would take all into the march of progress. How

much of these qualities was innate, how much he drew from his high

lineage, how much from the teachings of his illustrious father, can

never be known, but he blended them in a halo that will not soon fade

from his memory.

Sir, others have spoken of the incidents of his life and of his unabated

fidelity to its claims. I can not add to his record. I have met him in

battle array; I have embraced him with a soldier's warmth. We entered

Congress together; we have fought here side by side. It has fallen to my

lot to eulogize him. This I will venture: It would mar the catalogue of

bright names of which America is so proud if his were omitted from the

roll.

Memorial Addresses on the Life and Character of William H. F. Lee (A Representative from Virginia) Delivered in the House of Representatives and in the Senate, Fifty-Second Congress, First Session · 第 29 / 42 题