211. A figure of Time, imitating a bronze.

[13] Smith’s naval ancestor won his sobriquet, “Tom of Ten

Thousand,” very easily. He had compelled the French corvette

_Gironde_ to salute the British colours in Plymouth Sound, for

which, on complaint, he was dismissed the navy for exceeding his

instructions, but was shortly reinstated. The public believed

that he had fired into the _Gironde_ to compel its respect to our

flag, and on this exaggerated report gave him the name “Tom of Ten

Thousand.” Smith, who rose to high rank, but won no great personal

distinction, presided over the court-martial which condemned

Admiral Byng in 1757.

It may be added that the name “Tom of Ten Thousand” has been borne

by several men, notably by Thomas Thynne of Longleat, who was so

called on account of his wealth. He was murdered in Pall Mall in

February 1682, by three assassins hired by Count Königsmark. The

murder is realistically portrayed on his tomb in the south aisle

of Westminster Abbey. Another “Tom of Ten Thousand” was Thomas

Hudson, a native of Leeds, who lost a large fortune in the South

Sea Scheme, and, becoming insane, wandered the streets of London

for years, leaning on a crutch.

[14] These coincidences of residence seem to be overstated by

Smith. It must have been after, not before, his visit to Italy,

which he made in his 36th year, that Wilson took apartments in the

Piazza on the north side of Covent Garden. He lived above the rooms

of Cock, the auctioneer, who was followed by Langford, and later

still by George Robins. Sir Peter Lely had lived in the same house

from 1662 until his death in 1680, and here his collections were

sold in 1667. Smith seems to be wrong about Kneller. This painter’s

house had been on the east side of the Square, known as the Little

Piazza. Its garden, stretching back to Bow Street, was the scene of

the famous quarrel between Kneller and Dr. Ratcliffe. A tenant who

did precede Wilson was Hogarth, who, though he did not reside at

Cock’s, had exhibited here his “Mariage à la Mode” gratis, with a

view to its sale.

Wilson had a model made of a portion of the Piazza, which he used

as a receptacle for his implements. The rustic work of the piers

was provided with drawers, and the openings of the arches held

pencils and oil bottles. An unbending devotion to his Italian

manner of painting (he so Italianised a view of Kew Gardens that

George the Third failed to recognise it) and a rough temper brought

this fine painter to humbler dwellings in Charlotte Street, Great

Queen Street, and Foley Place; finally, to a room in Tottenham

Street. His fortunes were mended at the last by his appointment

as Librarian to the Royal Academy, and his succession to a small

estate in Wales on the death of his brother.

[15] See a plate in the _Lady’s Magazine_ of 1870, in which Miss

Catley wears such elbow ruffles in the character of Rosetta in

_Love in a Village_.

[16] The death of Molly Mogg was thus announced in the _Gentleman’s

Magazine_: “Mrs. Mary Mogg, at Oakingham: she was the person on

whom Gay wrote the song of ‘Molly Mogg.’” This song was first

printed in _Mist’s Weekly Journal_ of August 27, 1726, with a note

stating that “it was writ by two or three men of wit (who have

diverted the public both in prose and verse), upon the occasion of

their lying at a certain inn at Ockingham, where the daughter of

the house was remarkably pretty, and whose name is Molly Mogg.”

These “men of wit” were supposed to have been Pope, Swift, and Gay,

and it was believed that they had together concocted the song, but

the weight of evidence is in favour of Gay’s sole authorship. There

is, however, enough doubt to warrant one in holding to the pleasant

tradition that the three poets, over their cups at the Rose Inn,

made the song which began (original version):--

“Says my Uncle, I pray you discover

What has been the cause of your woes,

That you pine and you whine like a lover?

I’ve seen Molly Mog of the Rose.

Oh, Nephew! your grief is but folly,

In town you may find better prog;

Half a crown there will get you a Molly,

A Molly much better than Mog.

…

The school boys delight in a play-day,

The schoolmaster’s joy is to flog;

The milk-maid’s delight is in May day,

But mine is in sweet Molly Mog.”

[17] Finch’s Grotto Garden stood on the site now occupied by the

headquarters of the Metropolitan Fire Brigade. It was opened--six

years before John Thomas Smith was born--on the strength of a

spring in the grounds which a Dr. Townshend was willing to declare

medicinal. Concerts and fireworks were given with fair success, and

here “Tommy” Lowe accepted engagements after his failure in the

management of Marylebone Gardens. The tavern was burnt down in May

1795, and was replaced by another called the “Goldsmith’s Arms,”

afterwards styled the “Old Grotto New Reviv’d.” This tavern bore

the inscription--

“Here Herbs did grow

And flowers sweet,

But now ’tis call’d

Saint George’s Street.”

All that is known about Finch’s Grotto is told by Mr. Warwick

Wroth in his admirable _London Pleasure Gardens of the Eighteenth

Century_.

[18] This famous aid to the teething of children was invented about

the year 1717, when there appeared a _Philosophical Essay upon the

Celebrated Anodyne Necklace_, dedicated to Dr. Paul Chamberlen

(who died in this year), and the Royal Society. This tract, quoted

by Mr. J. Eliot Hodgkin in _Notes and Queries_ of Feb. 16, 1884,

argues the advantages of the necklace as follows:--

“For since the difficult _Cutting of Children’s Teeth_ proceeds

from the hard and strict Closure of their _Gums_; If you get Them

but once separated and opened, the _Teeth_ will of themselves

Naturally come Forth; Now the Smooth Alcalious Atoms of the

_Necklace_, by their insinuating figure and shape, do so make

way for their Protrusion by gently _softening_ and _opening_ the

hard swelled _Gums_, that the TEETH will of themselves without

any difficulty or pain CUT and come out, as has been sufficiently

proved.”

Mr. Hodgkin describes the necklace as “of beads artificially

prepared, small, like barley-corns,” costing five shillings. An

early depôt was Garraway’s at the Royal Exchange Gate. In Smith’s

day they were sold in Long Acre by Mr. Burchell at the sign of the

Anodyne Necklace, and the price was still “5s. single,” with “an

allowance by the dozen to sell again.” Burchell advertised: “After

the Wearing of which about their Neck but One night, Children have

immediately cut their TEETH with Safety, who but just before were

on the Brink of the Grave.”

[19] According to Daulby’s numbering.

[20] For some curious erudition on go-carts see Smith’s _Life of

Nollekens_, where he says (1829 ed. i. 221): “When I was a boy,

the go-cart was common in every toy-shop in London; but it was to

be found in the greatest abundance in the once far-famed turners’

shop in Spinning-wheel Alley, Moorfields: a narrow passage leading

from those fields to the spot upon which the original Bethlehem

Hospital stood in Bishopsgate Street. In 1825-26, however, both

Spinning-wheel Alley and Old Bethlehem were considerably altered

and widened, and subsequently named Liverpool Street.”

[21] Hone says: “The late King George IV. and his brothers and

sisters, all the royal family of George III., were rocked. The

rocker was a female officer of the household, with a salary”

(_Every Day Book_). Rocker cradles are to-day made in Ireland by

villagers, and sold from door to door.

[22] Two artists, father and son, bore the name of Israel von

Meckenen. They flourished in the fifteenth and early sixteenth

centuries, and appear to have collaborated on some 250 prints. The

British Museum has a fine set of their engravings.

[23] The stone inscribed “Here lies Nancy Dawson” no longer exists.

M. Dorsay Ansell, the obliging keeper of the burial-grounds (now

laid out as one recreation-ground) of St. George the Martyr and

St. George’s, Bloomsbury, is frequently applied to for information

as to its existence. Eighteen years ago, when these grounds were

formed, careful search was made for interesting stones, and the

gravestone of Zachary Macaulay, among others, was discovered by Mr.

Ansell. That of Nancy Dawson was never found, but it may be buried

out of sight.

Nancy Dawson is stated to have died at Haverstock Hill, May 27,

1767. Her portrait in oils still hangs in the Garrick Club, and the

print-sellers are familiar with her figure in theatrical costume.

She is believed to have been born about 1730, to have been the

daughter of a Clare Market porter, and to have lived in poverty in

St. Giles’s or in a Drury Lane cellar. The rather ill-supported

narratives of her career speak, as does Smith, of her waiting on

the skittle-players at a Marylebone tavern, which Mr. George Clinch

thinks (_Marylebone and St. Pancras_) may have been the old “Rose

of Normandy” in High Street.

Nancy Dawson’s fortune was made in 1759 in the Beggars’ Opera. The

man who danced the hornpipe among the thieves happened to have

fallen ill, and his place was taken by Nancy, who was then a rising

young actress. From that moment her success was secure. Her real

monument is the song beginning--

“Of all the girls in our town,

The black, the fair, the red, the brown,

That dance and prance it up and down,

There’s none like Nancy Dawson!

Her easy mien, her shape so neat,

She foots, she trips, she looks so sweet,

Her ev’ry motion’s so complete,

I die for Nancy Dawson!”

[24] Musgrave’s note continues: “Whom she deserted upon his

discovering that she had an intrigue with the exciseman of that

district.”

[25] Rubens’s beautiful second wife, Helena Fourment, who was only

sixteen when he married her. She is the subject of not a few of his

pictures.

[26] Nollekens, the sculptor, highly approved of puddings for

children, and would say, “Ay, now, what’s your name?” “Mrs.

Rapworth, sir.” “Well, Mrs. Rapworth, you have done right; I wore a

pudding when I was a little boy, and all my mother’s children wore

puddings.”

[27] The parent of the Royal Academy, as an exhibiting body, was

the Foundling Hospital in Guilford Street. A number of painters,

including Hogarth, Reynolds, Richard Wilson, and Gainsborough,

agreed to present pictures to Captain Coram’s charity. These

were shown with such success, that the possibility of holding

remunerative exhibitions was perceived, and in 1760 a free

exhibition was opened in the rooms of the Society of Arts. In

following years exhibitions were held in Spring Gardens. In 1765

the “Incorporated Society of Artists of Great Britain” obtained

its charter; but disputes arose, and three years later twenty or

more painters successfully petitioned George III. to establish the

“Royal Academy of Arts in London.” So many of the original members

of the Royal Academy are mentioned by Smith, that it will be useful

to insert their names. They were all nominated by George III.:

Sir Joshua Reynolds.

Benjamin West.

Thomas Sandby.

Francis Cotes.

John Baker.

Mason Chamberlin.

John Gwynn.

Thomas Gainsborough.

J. Baptist Cipriani.

Jeremiah Meyer.

Francis Milner Newton.

Paul Sandby.

Francesco Bartolozzi.

Charles Catton.

Nathaniel Hone.

William Tyler.

Nathaniel Dance.

Richard Wilson.

G. Michael Moser.

Samuel Wale.

Peter Toms.

Angelica Kauffman.

Richard Yeo.

Mary Moser.

William Chambers.

Joseph Wilton.

George Barret.

Edward Penny.

Agostino Carlini.

Francis Hayman.

Dominic Serres.

John Richards.

Francesco Zuccarelli.

George Dance.

William Hoare.

Johan Zoffany.

A year and a day after the foundation of the Royal Academy, it

was resolved: “There shall be a new order, or rank of members, to

be called Associates of the Royal Academy.” Of the first twenty

Associates, the following are mentioned in the _Rainy Day_: Richard

Cosway, John Bacon, James Wyatt, Joseph Nollekens, James Barry (all

of whom were afterwards R.A.’s); and Antonio Zucchi, Michael Angelo

Rooker, and Biagio Rebecca.

The first Royal Academy exhibition was opened to the public in

Pall Mall “immediately east of where the United Service Club now

stands” (Wheatley) on the 26th of April, 1769. Two years later,

the King assigned rooms in Somerset House to the Academy, but his

offer was not utilised until the new Somerset House was ready, in

1780. Here the annual exhibitions were held for fifty-eight years.

The Academicians then migrated to the eastern half of the National

Gallery building in Trafalgar Square. In 1869 the removal to

Burlington House was made. The history of the rise and progress of

the Royal Academy, which Smith wished might have been undertaken by

its secretary, Henry Howard, R.A., has been written very fully by

William Sandby, and again recently by the late J. E. Hodgson, R.A.,

and Mr. F. A. Eaton in collaboration.

[28] In this riot in St. George’s Fields, five or six people were

killed by the Guards, and about fifteen wounded.

[29] Henry Fuseli (1741-1825) had come to London in 1763. On

presenting himself before Sir Joshua Reynolds, the following

dialogue occurred: “How long have you studied in Italy?” “I

never studied in Italy--I studied in Zurich--I am a native of

Switzerland--do you think I should study in Italy? and, above

all, is it worth while?” “Young man, were I the author of these

drawings, and were I offered ten thousand a year _not_ to practise

as an artist, I would reject the proposal with contempt.”

[30] Dr. John Armstrong, whose poem, “The Art of Preserving

Health,” was long famous, is now best remembered as the author of

a few stanzas in Thomson’s _Castle of Indolence_ describing the

morbid effects of indolence. Haydon writes of Fuseli: “He swore

roundly, a habit which he told me he contracted from Dr. Armstrong.”

[31] Sir John Eardley-Wilmot, Chief Justice of the Common Pleas,

decided several cases arising out of Wilkes’s libels: his reply to

Lord North’s extraordinary letter was the only one he could make.

In spite of Wilkes’s easy victory at the poll, the House of Commons

declared that Colonel Luttrell ought to have been elected, and his

name was substituted for Wilkes’s in the return, a proceeding which

inflamed the situation.

[32] Henry William Bunbury stands apart from his

fellow-caricaturists as a wealthy amateur. He was the second son

of the Rev. Sir William Bunbury, Bart., of Great Barton, Suffolk,

and married Catherine Horneck, the “Little Comedy” of Goldsmith.

Bretherton was an engraver and printseller in Bond Street. He

engraved nearly all Bunbury’s drawings, and it was said that he

alone could do so with good effect.

[33] For almost a century the exodus of the London citizens to the

outlying country was considered fair game for satire. Bunbury’s

caricature of 1772 only records the humours which Robert Lloyd

had touched in “The Cit’s Country Box,” printed in No. 135 of the

_Connoisseur_.

“The trav’ler with amazement sees

A temple, Gothic or Chinese,

With many a bell and tawdry rag on,

And crested with a sprawling dragon.

A wooden arch is bent astride

A ditch of water four feet wide;

With angles, curves, and zigzag lines,

From Halfpenny’s exact designs.

In front a level lawn is seen,

Without a shrub upon the green;

Where taste would want its first great law,

But for the skulking sly Ha-Ha;

By whose miraculous assistance

You gain a prospect two fields distance.

And now from Hyde Park Corner come

The gods of Athens and of Rome:

Here squabby Cupids take their places,

With Venus and the clumsy graces;

Apollo there, with aim so clever,

Stretches his leaden bow for ever.”

Even Cowper saw little but absurdity in the demand for villas and

“summer-houses.”

“Suburban villas, highway-side retreats,

That dread th’ encroachment of our growing streets,

Tight boxes neatly sash’d, and in a blaze

With all a July sun’s collected rays,

Delight the citizen, who, gasping there,

Breathes clouds of dust, and calls it country air.”

Horace Smith, Lord Byron, and Thomas Hood all touched more or less

satirically on this subject.

[34] There is a confusion here. Walpole in his _Anecdotes

of Painting_ deals only with Jonathan Richardson the elder

(1665-1745), portrait painter and critic; Smith refers to his son

(1694-1771). The two were greatly attached to each other. There

was a story that they sketched each other’s faces every day. Old

Richardson, who wrote a treatise on _Paradise Lost_, was able to

study the classics only through his son, on whom he doted. Hogarth

made a caricature, which he suppressed, of the father using his son

as a telescope to read the writers of Greece and Rome. W. H. Pyne

says of Old Richardson in _Wine and Walnuts_: “He seldom rambled

city-ways, though sometimes he stepped in at the ‘Rainbow,’ where

he counted a few worthies, or looked in at Dick’s and gave them

a note or two. He would not put his foot on the threshold of the

‘Devil,’ however, for he thought the sign profane. Fielding would

run a furlong to escape him; he called him Doctor Fidget.”

[35] The milkmaids’ chief haunt was Islington, whence hundreds

of them carried the milk into London every morning. In his print

“Evening,” the scene of which is laid outside the “Middleton

Head,” Hogarth has an Islington milkmaid milking a cow, and in

his “Enraged Musicians,” a milkmaid with her cry of _Milk Belouw_

contributes to the town noises. The “garlands of massive plate”

which the milkmaids carried round on May Day were borrowed

of pawnbrokers on security. One pawnbroker, says Hone, was

particularly resorted to. He let his plate at so much per hour,

under bond from housekeepers for its safe return. In this way one

set of milkmaids would hire the garland from ten o’clock till one,

and another from one till six, and so on during the first three

days of May. These customs had all but passed away when Smith

wrote his _Rainy Day_, but long after the milkmaids had ceased

to celebrate the London May Day the chimney-sweepers brought out

their Jacks-in-the-green, specimens of which have been seen in

the streets in the last twenty years. In 1825, Hone speaks of the

dances round the “garland” as a “lately disused custom.”

[36] The boxes and pavilions at Vauxhall were decorated with

paintings at the suggestion of Hogarth, who permitted his “Four

Times of the Day” to be copied by Francis Hayman. He also presented

Tyers with a picture from his own hand, “Henry VIII. and Anne

Boleyn,” receiving in acknowledgment a gold ticket inscribed

“In perpetuam Beneficii memoriam,” and giving admission to “a

coachfull” of people. The Vauxhall paintings chiefly represented

sports and sentimental scenes. Among Hayman’s works were, “The Game

of Quadrille,” “Children Playing at Shuttlecock,” “Leap Frog,”

“Falstaff’s Cowardice Detected,” etc. In November 1841, twenty-four

of these pictures, all in a dirty condition, were sold in the

Gardens at prices varying from 30s. to £10.

[37] Marcellus Lauron, or Laroon (1653-1702), was born at the

Hague, and came to London, where he painted draperies for Sir

Godfrey Kneller and executed his “Cryes of London,” engraved by

Tempest. His son, Captain Marcellus Lauron, or Laroon, was soldier,

artist, and actor, and a friend of Hogarth.

[38] Probably Dr. George Armstrong, brother of Dr. John Armstrong,

author of the poem, “The Art of Preserving Health.”

[39] In Smith’s boyhood the “Queen’s Head and Artichoke” was a

rural tavern and tea-garden in Marylebone Park, quarter of a

mile north of the New Road, now Marylebone Road. The Marylebone

Gardens were in decline, and their place was taken by three smaller

resorts, the “Queen’s Head and Artichoke,” the “Jew’s Harp,” and

the “Yorkshire Stingo.” The two first-named places were connected

by a zigzag path known as Love Lane. In his _Nollekens_ Smith has

this choice morsel: “Mrs. Nollekens made it a rule to allow one

servant--as they kept two--to go out on the alternate Sunday; for

it was Mrs. Nollekens’ opinion that if they were never permitted

to visit the ‘Jew’s Harp,’ ‘Queen’s Head and Artichoke,’ or Chalk

Farm, they never would wash _theirselves_.” The site of the

“Artichoke” was covered by Decimus Burton’s Colosseum.

[40] The “Jew’s Harp,” dubiously explained as a corruption of

_jeu trompe_, _i.e._ toy-trumpet, stood near the lower portion of

the Broad Walk in Regent’s Park. Its arbours and tea-garden were

long an attraction to the London youth. Here Arthur Onslow, when

Speaker, was accustomed to sit in an evening smoking his pipe, and

sharing in the tavern talk. The landlord’s discovery that his guest

was the Speaker of the House of Commons cost him his customer,

for when Onslow found himself received at the “Jew’s Harp” with

ceremony, he discontinued his visits.

[41] This farm in the possession of Thomas Willan was taken by

order of the Treasury for the formation of Regent’s Park in 1794.

It contained about 288 acres.

[42] Marylebone Gardens had their main entrance in High Street,

Marylebone, and extended eastward to Harley Street.

[43] Richard Kendall’s farm, comprising about 133 acres, was

absorbed in Regent’s Park.

[44] The “Green Man” (rebuilt) stands east of Portland Road,

Metropolitan Railway Station, on the site of the “Farthing Pie

House,” at which scraps of mutton put into a crust were sold for a

farthing. The rural state of this neighbourhood, and the regrets

which the spread of London awakened, are set forth in Dr. Ducarel’s

speech in the chapter, “Nothing to Eat,” in Ephraim Hardcastle’s

(William Henry Pyne’s) delightful _Wine and Walnuts_:--

“‘Verily I cannot get this mighty street out of my head,’ said

the Doctor. ‘And then there is the new park--what do you call it?

Mary-le-bone--no, the Regent’s Park: it seems to be an elegant,

well-planned place, methinks, and will have a fine effect, no

doubt, with its villas and what not, when the shrubs and trees have

shot up a little. But I shall not live to see it, and I care not;

for I remember those fields in their natural, rural garb, covered

with herds of kine, when you might stretch across from old Willan’s

farm there, a-top of Portland Street, right away without impediment

to Saint John’s Wood, where I have gathered blackberries when a

boy--which pretty place, I am sorry to see, these brick-and-mortar

gentry have trenched upon. Why, Ephraim, you metropolitans will

have half a day’s journey, if you proceed at this rate, ere you

can get a mouthful of fresh air. Where the houses are to find

inhabitants, and, when inhabited, where so many mouths are to find

meat, must be found out by those who come after.’”

[45] Smith seems to have understated the facts. James Easton, the

author of a curious work, entitled “_Human Longevity_, recording

the name, age, place of residence, and year of the decease of 1712

persons, who attained a century and upwards, from A.D. 66 to 1799,

etc.” (Salisbury, 1799), enumerates sixty-one cases in this year as

against Smith’s forty-eight. He gives the following particulars of

the three cases named by Smith:--

“Mrs. Keithe--133, of Newnham, Gloucestershire. She, lived

moderately, and retained her senses till within fourteen days of

her death. She left three daughters, the eldest aged one hundred

and eleven; the second one hundred and ten; the youngest one

hundred and nine. Also seven great, and great great grandchildren.

“Mr. Rice--115, of Southwark, cooper.

“Mrs. Chun--138, near Litchfield, Staffordshire; resided in the

same house one hundred and three years. By frequent exercise, and

temperate living, she attained so great longevity. She left one son

and two daughters, the youngest upwards of one hundred years.”

[46] According to one story, Mother Damnable was Jinney, the

daughter of a Kentish Town brick-maker, named Jacob Bingham. After

living with a marauder named Gipsy George, who was hanged for

sheep-stealing, Jinney passed from the protection of one criminal

to another, until she was left a lonesome and embittered woman. She

lived in her own cottage, built on waste land by her father, and

abused everyone.

“’Tis Mother Damnable! that monstrous thing,

Unmatch’d by Macbeth’s wayward women’s ring.

For cursing, scolding, fuming, flinging fire

I’ the face of madam, lord, knight, gent, cit, squire.”

The story went that on the night of her death hundreds of persons

saw the Devil enter her house. On the site rose the inn which bore

her portrait as its sign. Smith’s mention of the terror with which

it was regarded may have reference to its loneliness and gruesome

traditions. In his own day the inn was a pleasant resort. “Then the

old Mother Red Cap was the evening resort of worn-out Londoners,

and many a happy evening was spent in the green fields round about

the old wayside houses by the children of poorer classes. At that

time the Dairy, at the junction of the Hampstead and Kentish Town

roads, was not the fashionable building it is now, but with forms

for the pedestrians to rest on, they served out milk fresh from the

cow to all who came” (John Palmer, _St. Pancras_). This dairy, so

long a landmark to North Londoners, has just disappeared in favour

of a “Tube” railway station.

[47] This curious work may still be seen in Little Denmark Street,

where its forty or fifty writhing figures, incrusted with grime,

look at a little distance like some ordinary floral design. The

original “Resurrection Gate” was erected about the year 1687, in

accordance with an order of the vestry. The bill of expenses is

extant, and its terms were contributed by Dr. Rimbault to _Notes

and Queries_ of June 23, 1864, showing the cost to have been £185,

14s. 6d., of which £27 was paid for the carving to an artist named

Love. In 1900, the present Tuscan gate in Little Denmark Street was

erected with the old carving inserted.

[48] Probably Charles Harriot Smith, the architect, who was at

first a stone-carver. He died in 1864.

[49] The Reverend James Bean was Vicar of Olney, Buckinghamshire,

and assistant librarian at the British Museum. He died in 1826, and

was buried in St. George’s, Bloomsbury, burial-ground.

[50] Strype says these almshouses bore the inscription, “St.

Giles’s Almshouse, anno domini 1656.” They were removed in 1782.

[51] Originally Queen Anne’s Square and now Queen Anne’s Gate.

[52] The Pound stood, as Smith indicates, in the broad space where

St. Giles High Street, Tottenham Court Road, and Oxford Street met;

it was removed in 1765.

[53] This song, entitled “Just the Thing,” is valuable as a

portrait of the eighteenth-century “hooligan,” ancestor of Mr.

Clarence Rook’s nineteenth century “Alf” in _Hooligan Nights_:--

“On Newgate steps Jack Chance was found,

And bred up near St. Giles’s Pound,

My story is true, deny it who can,

By saucy, leering Billingsgate Nan.

Her bosom glowed with heartfelt joy

When first she held the lovely boy.

Then home the prize she straight did bring,

And they all allow’d he was just the thing.

At twelve years old, I have been told,

The youth was sturdy, stout, and bold;

He learn’d to curse, to swear, and fight,

And everything but read and write.

But when he came to man’s estate,

His mind it ran on something great,

A-thieving then he scorn’d to tramp;

So hir’d a pad and went on the scamp.

At clubs he all Flash Soup did sing.

And they all allow’d he was just the thing.

His manual exercise gone through,

Of Bridewell, Pump, and Horse Pond too,

His back had often felt the smart

Of Tyburn strings at the tail of a cart.

He stood the patter, but that’s no matter,

He gammon’d the Twelve, and work’d on the water,

Then a pardon he got from his gracious King,

And swaggering Jack was just the thing.

Like a captain bold, well arm’d for war.

With bludgeon stout, or iron bar,

At heading a mob, he never did fail,

At burning a mass-house, or gutting a jail;

But a victim he fell to his country’s laws,

And died at last in religion’s cause.

NO POPERY! made the blade to swing,

And when tuck’d up he was just the thing.”

[54] Mr. George Clinch, in his _Marylebone and St. Pancras_,

says that there is some reason to think that a portion at least

of Capper’s farm still remains. A large furniture establishment

at Nos. 195-198, Tottenham Court Road, exhibits on a wall in the

rear two tablets marking the boundary of St. Pancras and St.

Giles-in-the-Fields, and bearing eighteenth-century dates. An old

lease of the property, Mr. Clinch adds, contains a clause binding

the tenant to keep stabling for forty head of cattle, and it is

known that the premises were once used as a large livery stable.

[55] Hanway Street now boasts only one milliner, but has several

art and curiosity shops of the kind Smith loved. The “Blue Posts”

(rebuilt) is still at the corner of Hanway Street. Mr. Joshua

Sturges’ book, published in 1800, was on draughts, not chess. It

was entitled _Guide to the Game of Draughts_, and was dedicated by

permission to the Prince of Wales. It has an engraved frontispiece,

“Figure of the Draught Table.”

Sturges was probably not buried, as Smith states, in the Hampstead

Road, but in St. Pancras cemetery (see _Notes and Queries_, Series

II. x. 64). Lovers of draughts may be glad to have a copy of his

epitaph. It ran thus: “SACRED TO THE MEMORY of MR. JOSHUA STURGES.

Many years a RESPECTABLE LICENSED VICTUALLER in this Parish; who

departed this Life the 12th of August, 1813. Aged 55 years. He

was esteemed for the many excellent Qualities he possessed, and

his desire to improve the Minds, as also to benefit the Trade of

his Brother Victuallers. His Genius was also eminently displayed

to create innocent and rational amusement to Mankind, in the

Production of his Treatise on the difficult game of Draughts,

which Treatise received the Approbation of his Prince, and many

other Distinguished Characters. In private Life he was mild and

unassuming; in his public capacity neither the love of Interest or

domestic ease, could separate this faithful Friend from the Society

of which he was a Member, in the performance of Duties which his

Mind deemed Paramount to all others. His example was worthy of

Imitation in this World. May his Virtues be rewarded in the next.

Peace to his Soul, and respected be his Memory.”

[56] Goodge Street (named after a Marylebone property owner) still

retains some of its original houses, but no house whose ground

floor has not been converted into a shop. Windmill Street, on

the other hand, is a quaint little street of artificers in wood

and metal, instrument makers, etc., many of its houses remaining

in their first state, with forecourts. The rural traditions of

this street are supported at No. 40 by a vine, bearing bunches

of unripened grapes in August 1903. Colvill Court is now called

Colvill Place, but it is essentially a court. The name Gresse’s

Gardens (after the father of Alexander Gresse the water-colour

painter) survives in Gresse Street, a queer little dusty, dusky

byway, easy to enter from Rathbone Place, but difficult to quit at

its southern end by Tudor Place. Here His Majesty’s mail vans are

stabled.

[57] This pond is plainly marked also in Rocque’s map of 1745.

Considering its interesting name, it has obtained singularly little

mention by topographers.

[58] Whitefield built his chapel--in 1756, not 1754--on land

leased for seventy-one years from General Fitzroy. He opened it on

November 7th of the same year, preaching a sermon from the text,

“Other foundation can no man lay than that is laid, which is Jesus

Christ.” A house for the minister and twelve almshouses were added,

and the chapel enlarged. Whitefield proposed to be buried in its

vaults, and told to his congregation, “Messrs. John and Charles

Wesley shall also be buried there. We will all lie together.”

All three were buried elsewhere, but Mrs. Whitefield was buried

here: her remains and those of all other persons, except Augustus

Toplady, were removed to Chingford cemetery when the present

building was begun. A remarkable monument was that to John Bacon,

R.A., the sculptor, with its impressive inscription: “What I was as

an artist seemed to me of some importance while I lived, but what

I really was, as a believer in Jesus Christ, is the only thing of

importance to me now.” After a serious fire in 1857, the original

brick building was altered out of knowledge, and was finally

demolished in 1889. For some years an iron chapel and an appeal for

subscriptions occupied the ground. In 1892 the present ornately

fronted chapel, inscribed “Whitefield Memorial,” was built. In

1903, the present minister, the Reverend C. Silvester Horne,

received “recognition” as the thirteenth minister in succession to

Whitefield.

[59] More correctly, Crab and Walnut Tree Field.

[60] Smith makes a slip in locating the historic fight between

Broughton and Slack in April 1750, at the “Adam and Eve” tavern.

It took place in Broughton’s own Amphitheatre near Adam and Eve

Court in the Oxford Road. Smith correctly states the position

of this Amphitheatre in his _Antient Topography of London_

(1810): “Broughton’s Amphitheatre is still standing; it is at the

south-west corner of Castle Street, Wells Street; the lower part

is a coal shed, the upper a stage for timber.” Its site is now

occupied by No. 62 Castle Street East, close to Adam and Eve Court.

Here it was that the founder of the modern prize-ring, whose

“Broughton rules” were observed everywhere until 1838, met disaster

in his fight with the plucky Norwich butcher. The result was his

retirement from the ring, and the loss by his backer, the Duke of

Cumberland, of a bet of £10,000. In his later years, Broughton

lived in Walcot Place, Lambeth, where he died, aged 85. He was

buried in Lambeth Church. A monument to him in the West Walk of

the Cloisters of Westminster Abbey describes him as “Yeoman of the

Guard”; and it is stated in the _Dictionary of National Biography_

that a place among the Yeomen was obtained for him by the Duke of

Cumberland. In his _Historical Memorials of Westminster Abbey_,

Dean Stanley says: “After his name on the gravestone is a space,

which was to have been filled up with the words ‘Champion of

England.’ The Dean objected, and the blank remains.” But the blank

does not remain. It was filled in 1832 with the names of Roger

Monk, another Yeoman of the Guard, and his wife. It is worthy

of note, too, that the _earliest_ name on the tablet is that of

Broughton’s wife, Elizabeth, who was actually buried here.

[61] See note p. 105.

[62] Fischer had the further distinction of being married to a

daughter of J. T. S., whose other daughter married a Mr. Smith, a

sculptor.

[63] Gooseberry Fair followed the suppressed Tottenham Fair. Both

were held in and about the Adam and Eve Tavern. Richard Yates and

Ned Shuter appeared together at various London fairs.

[64] Charles Fleetwood threw Drury Lane into confusion both behind

and before the scenes, by his unpunctual payment of salaries, and

by attempting to introduce pantomimes against the wishes of the

old play-goers. This led to noisy scenes in 1744, in one of which

Horace Walpole stigmatised Fleetwood as “an impudent rascal” from

his box, and was embarrassed by the enthusiastic approval of the

audience.

[65] The exact site of the famous Footsteps is not easily

determined. Dr. Rimbault (_Notes and Queries_, February 2, 1850)

says that it was reputed to be “at the extreme termination of

the north-east end of Upper Montague Street.” It is placed a

little farther west by Robert Hill, the water-colour painter, who

stated in a letter, quoted by Mr. Wheatley in his _London_: “I

well remember the Brothers’ Footsteps. They were near a bank that

divided two of the fields between Montague House and the New Road,

and their situation must have been, if my recollection serves me,

what is now Torrington Square.” Smith says the Footsteps were “on

the site of Mr. Martin’s chapel, or nearly so.” Mr. John Martin,

the Baptist minister, had the chapel in Keppel Street. It still

exists. This brings the Footsteps a few yards south, but Smith’s

indefiniteness must be taken into account. That these markings

were visible as late as 1800 is proved by the following entry in

the Commonplace Book of Joseph Moser: “June 16th, 1800. Went into

the fields at the back of Montague House, and there saw, for the

last time, the Forty Footsteps: the building materials are there

to cover them from the sight of man.” The feeling with which these

curious marks were regarded by educated people may be judged by

a letter quoted in the _Gentleman’s Magazine_ of December 1804,

in which the writer expresses his conviction that “the Almighty

has ordered it as a standing monument of his great displeasure of

the horrid sin of duelling,” an opinion in which the poet Southey

concurred. In 1828, Miss Jane Porter published her novel, _The

Field of the Forty Footsteps_.

[66] Nearly a hundred years later, a similar superstition survived

in London, and is thus noted by Brand in his _Popular Antiquities_:

“In the _Morning Post_, Monday, May 2nd, 1791, it was mentioned

‘that yesterday, being the first of May, according to annual and

superstitious custom, a number of persons went into the fields and

bathed their faces with the dew on the grass, under the idea that

it would render them beautiful.’”

[67] The occasion was a dinner at Tom Davies’s in 1762. “BOSWELL:

Does not Gray’s poetry, sir, tower above the common mark? JOHNSON:

Yes, sir; but we must attend to the difference between what men

in general cannot do if they would, and what every man may do if

he would. Sixteen-string Jack towered above the common mark.”

Dr. William Bell, whom Rann robbed, was Rector of Christ Church,

London, 1780-99, and treasurer of St. Paul’s Cathedral.

[68] Probably a mistake. These nosegays were given to condemned

criminals on their way to Tyburn by the St. Sepulchre authorities.

Rann was one of the last to receive the gift.

[69] Saunders Welch, the father of Mrs. Nollekens, was educated

in Aylesbury workhouse, and for many years was a grocer in Museum

Street, then Queen Street. He succeeded Fielding as a Justice of

the Peace for Westminster. Smith says in his _Nollekens_ that he

met many people who recollected seeing him as High Constable of

Westminster, “dressed in black, with a large, nine-storey George

the Second’s wig highly powdered, with long flowing curls over his

shoulder, a high three-cornered hat, and his black baton tipped

with silver at either end, riding on a white horse to Tyburn with

the malefactors.” A long and warm friendship existed between

Saunders Welch and Dr. Johnson. “Johnson, who had an eager and

unceasing curiosity to know human life in all its variety, told me

that he attended Mr. Welch in his office for a whole winter, to

hear the examinations of the culprits” (Boswell).

[70] To-day, High Street, Marylebone, is perhaps the most

perfect High Street left in London. Neither from its north end

in Marylebone Road nor from Oxford Street does it receive heavy

traffic; its shops exist for the fine streets and squares around

it, and it offers them the best of most things, from a tender

chicken to a county history.

[71] “In the year 1741, the old church in which Hogarth has

introduced his “Rake at the Altar with the Old Maid” was taken

down, and the present one built on its site; so that the writers

who have stated that the scene took place in the present edifice

must acknowledge their error, if they will take the trouble to

refer to Hogarth’s fifth plate of the Rake’s Progress, where they

will find its publication to have taken place June 25, 1735.”--S.

[72] Probably Christopher Norton, of the St. Martin’s Lane Academy.

[73] Tradition reports that from Elizabeth it came to the Forsyths,

and thence to the Duke of Portland. In his _Marylebone and St.

Pancras_, Mr. Clinch writes: “In the year 1703 a large school was

established here by Mr. De la Place. That gentleman’s daughter

married the Rev. John Fountayne, Rector of North Sidmouth, in

Wiltshire, and the latter succeeded Mr. De la Place in the school.

The school is said to have obtained a considerable reputation among

the nobility and gentry, whose sons there received an educational

training previously to their removal to the universities.”

[74] “Mr. Fountayne had one son, afterwards Dean of York, and

three daughters, viz. Mrs. Hargrave, Mrs. Jones, and Mrs. Metz.

Mrs. Hargrave was lately living; she was the wife of Counsellor

Hargrave, and was esteemed a great beauty. Another daughter

of Monsieur De la Place married the Rev. Mr. Dyer, brother to

the author of _Grongar Hill_, to whose nephew, the late Mr.

Dyer, the printseller, I am obliged for some parts of the above

information.”--S.

[75] Reproduced in Mr. Clinch’s _Marylebone and St. Pancras_ (1890).

[76] Michael Angelo Rooker (1743-1801), the water-colour painter

and engraver. “His works are drawn with conscientious accuracy,

and show a sweet pencil” (Redgrave). He died March 3, 1801, in

Dean Street, Soho, and was buried in the ground belonging to St.

Martin-in-the-Fields, in the Kentish Town Road. Examples of his

work are hung at South Kensington.

[77] The wonderful extra-illustrated copy presented to the Museum

by John Charles Crowle, and valued at £5000.

[78] That is to say tiled.

[79] The Rev. John Fountayne was more than “noticed” by Handel;

the two men were intimate. A grandson of Fountayne wrote in 1832:

“One evening as my grandfather and Handel were walking together

and alone, a new piece was struck up by the band. ‘Come, Mr.

Fountayne,’ said Handel, ‘let us sit down and listen to this

piece--I want to know your opinion of it.’ Down they sat, and

after some time the old parson, turning to his companion, said,

‘It is not worth listening to--it’s very poor stuff.’ ‘You are

right, Mr. F.,’ said Handel, ‘it is very poor stuff--I thought so

myself when I had finished it.’ The old gentleman, being taken

by surprise, was beginning to apologise; but Handel assured him

there was no necessity; that the music was really bad, having

been composed hastily, and his time for the production limited;

and that the opinion given was as correct as it was honest”

(Hone’s _Year Book_). “Clarke” was doubtless Dr. Adam Clarke, the

Wesleyan, who died in Bayswater in 1832, and was well known for his

bibliographical and theological works.

[80] Lady Harrington might well lend her jewels, since she often

borrowed. Horace Walpole tells how, at the Coronation of George

III., she appeared “covered with all the diamonds she could borrow,

hire, or seize, with the air of Roxana, the finest figure at a

distance.”

[81] The great actress. She played Violante to Garrick’s Don Felix

in the actor’s last appearance.

[82] In his _Memoirs_, the Rev. John Trusler, who was educated

at Dr. Fountayne’s school, does not spare Mrs. Fountayne’s

tuft-hunting tendencies. In one instance she was covered with

ridicule through the action of a Soho pastry-cook named Jenkins,

who, wishing his son to enter the school, arranged that he should

do so under the name of the Prince De Chimmay. When Mrs. Fountayne

discovered that his father made tarts a mile from the school door,

“she had the laugh so much against her, that she could not show her

face for months.”

[83] The Royal College of Physicians, then housed in Warwick Lane.

[84] Norfolk Street was the northern continuation of Newman Street;

it is now merged in Cleveland Street.

[85] John Baptist Locatelli, a native of Verona, had his studio in

Union Street, Tottenham Court Road, from 1776. He was befriended

by Horace Walpole, with whom he quarrelled bitterly over a group

representing Theseus offering assistance to Hercules. Walpole

refused to take this work, although he had already paid the

sculptor £350 on account, and was probably justified, since

Nollekens said the group looked “like the dry skins of two

brickmakers stuffed with clotted flocks from an old mattress.”

Locatelli worked also for the brothers Adam, and he superintended

the carving of the basso-relievos put up by Nollekens on the

outside of the Sessions House, Clerkenwell Green. In 1796 he left

England for Milan, where Buonaparte employed him and granted him a

pension. (See Smith’s _Life of Nollekens_, 1829, pp. 119-123, and

Thornbury’s _British Artists_, vol. ii. pp. 9-16).

[86] Wilson, upon whom a note has been given under the year 1766,

lived at No. 36 Charlotte Street, Fitzroy Square, within a few

minutes’ walk of this group of elms. He was accustomed of a fine

evening, says Redgrave, to throw open his window and invite his

friends to enjoy with him the glowing sunset behind the Hampstead

and Highgate hills. Fitzroy Square was not begun until 1790-94.

To-day the miles between Charlotte Street and these northern

heights are filled by streets. Nevertheless, Hampstead church

can still be seen from Charlotte Street, piercing the northern

distance, and, but for the slight deflection of Rathbone Place,

it would be visible from Oxford Street. John Constable afterwards

lived in the same street. The elms under which Wilson and Baretti

walked must have had their roots in the ground on which the east

side of Cleveland Street is built.

[87] It is difficult to form an idea of this instrument. It was

beaten with a rolling-pin, and appears to have been used as a drum

in such a way (according to the manner in which it was struck)

as to produce something like notes. This is indicated in Bonnell

Thornton’s burlesque, _Ode to St. Cecilia’s Day_, in which occur

the well-known lines which amused Dr. Johnson:--

“In strains more exalted the salt-box shall join,

And clattering and battering and clapping combine;

With a rap and a tap while the hollow side sounds.

Up and down leaps the flap, and with rattling rebounds.”

The character of the neighbourhood round the “Farthing Pie House”

(Portland Road Station) in Smith’s boyhood, may be judged by

Smith’s statement in his _Vagabondiana_, that “when the sites of

Portland Place, Devonshire Street, etc., were fields, the famous

Tommy Lowe, then a singer at Mary-le-bone Gardens, raised a

subscription, to enable an unfortunate man to run a small chariot,

drawn by four muzzled mastiffs, from a pond near Portland Chapel,

called Cockney Ladle, which supplied Mary-le-bone Bason with water,

to the ‘Farthing Pie House’ … in order to accommodate children with

a ride for a halfpenny.”

[88] By Queen Anne Street Smith means the street which has borne

the successive names of Little Queen Anne Street, Queen Anne Street

East, Foley Place, and (now) Langham Street. The present Queen Anne

Street is on the _west_ side of Portland Place; it was originally

Great Queen Anne Street, then Queen Anne Street West. A curious

interest attaches to these streets, neither of which runs, as it

seems destined to do, into Portland Place. Thus:--

[Illustration]

Their failure to run directly into Portland Place (see dotted

lines) is a relic of Foley House which occupied the site of the

Langham Hotel, and interposed its gardens where these streets would

have joined. It was afterwards intended to build a Queen Anne

Square at the foot of Great Portland Street, but this project fell

through.

[89] There were many ponds in the fields on which the streets

of St. Pancras and Marylebone are built. In an early view of

Whitefield’s Tabernacle, a pond is delineated on a spot now

covered, as nearly as may be judged, by Torrington Square. Farther

west, on the site of Duke Street, Portland Place, was the Cockney

Ladle, in which small boys bathed at the risk of having their

clothes seized by the parish beadles. Close by this--on the site

of the backs of the east side of Harley Street--was the Marylebone

Basin, a dangerously deep water. Many drownings occurred in ponds

of which no trace or memory remains. Thus, the _St. James’s

Chronicle_ of August 8, 1769, says: “Two young chairmen [_i.e._

carriers of sedan chairs] were unfortunately drowned on Friday

Evening last, in a Pond behind the North-Side of Portman-Square.

They had been beating a Carpet in the Square, and being thereby

warm and dirty agreed to bathe in the above Pond, not being aware

of its great Depth. The Man who first went in could swim, and while

he was swimming his Companion went in, but being presently out of

his Depth he sunk. The Swimmer immediately made to the Place to

save his Companion; but he, coming up again under the Swimmer,

laid fast hold of him, and they both sunk down together and were

drowned.”

[90] “On Friday last, Mr. Carlile, a Quaker of about 17 years of

age, had the misfortune to fall into Marylebone-Bason, and was

drowned” (_Daily Advertiser_, June 18, 1744).

[91] And from their contiguity to a French Protestant chapel,

founded in 1756.

[92] The difficulty of writing recent history is exemplified by

Smith in his account of Marylebone Gardens, which is far excelled

by Mr. Warwick Wroth’s chapter on Marylebone Gardens in his _London

Pleasure Gardens of the Eighteenth Century_ (1896). Fully to

annotate Smith’s chronology of these gardens would require many

pages, and the result would be unsatisfactory. I shall therefore

deal with only the more prominent names he mentions.

[93] May 7, 1668.

[94] M. Wroth says: “In 1691 the place was known as Long’s Bowling

Green at the Rose, and for several years (_circ._ 1679-1736)

persons of quality might have been seen bowling there during the

summer-time.

‘At the Groom Porters battered bullies play;

Some Dukes at Marybone bowl time away.’”

These lines, often erroneously attributed to Lady Mary Wortley

Montague, occur in Pope’s _The Basset-table, an Eclogue_.

[95] Rockhoult, or Rockholt House, was at Leyton, in Essex, and was

“for a short period an auxiliary place of amusement for the Summer

to the established Theatres” (_Gentleman’s Magazine_, July 1814).

It was opened about 1742, and was apparently regarded as “the place

to spend a happy day.” A ballad to “Delia” exclaimed--

“Delia, in whose form we trace

All that can a virgin grace,

Hark where pleasure, blithe as May,

Bids us to Rockholt haste away.”

[96] “The principal shareholder and manager of Ranelagh at this

date was Sir Thomas Robinson, Bart., M.P., whose gigantic form was

for many years familiar to frequenters of the Rotunda; a writer of

1774 calls him its Maypole, and Garland of Delights. Robinson lived

at Prospect Place, adjoining the gardens.”

[97] The New Wells belonged to the Islington group of pleasure

gardens, and stood on ground now occupied by Lower Rosomon Street,

Clerkenwell. It flourished 1737-50, and numbered a collection of

rattlesnakes among its attractions.

[98] Cuper’s Gardens, a great resort. The Feathers Tavern at the

end of Waterloo Bridge is the successor of the tavern originally in

the gardens, the site of which is traversed by the Waterloo Road.

They were closed in 1759, after which Dr. Johnson, passing them in

a coach with Langton, Beauclerk, and Lady Sydney Beauclerk (mother

of his friend), jokingly proposed, to Lady Sydney’s horror, that

they should lease them: “She had no notion of a joke, sir; she had

come late into life, and had a mighty unpliable understanding.”

[99] Advertised as “the Pariton, an instrument never played in

publick before.”

[100] Mary Ann Falkner was a niece of George Falkner, the Dublin

printer, whom Foote caricatured on the stage. She appeared at

Marylebone from 1747 to about 1752, giving such songs as “Amoret

and Phyllis,” “The Happy Couple,” and “The Faithful Lover.” Much

sought after, she remained faithful to her husband, a linen draper

named Donaldson, until his conduct threw her under the protection

of the second Earl of Halifax.

[101] M. Wroth says, on good evidence, that Trusler became

proprietor only in 1756.

[102] The career of young John Trusler, afterwards the Rev. Dr.

Trusler, is interesting. Without a collegiate training, he took

Holy Orders, and officiated as a curate in London. His eye for

business revealed to him the possibilities of sermon-mongering, and

he was soon making a respectable income by supplying clergymen all

over the country with sermons in script characters. His operations

became something of a scandal, and Cowper scourged him in “The

Task”--

“He grinds divinity of other days

Down into modern use, transforms old print

To zigzag manuscript, and cheats the eyes

Of gallery critics by a thousand arts.

Are there who purchase of the doctor’s ware?

Oh, name it not in Gath! It cannot be

That grave and learned clerks should need such aid.

He doubtless is in sport, and does but droll,

Assuming thus a rank unknown before--

Grand caterer and dry-nurse of the Church!”

Trusler also issued the morning and evening services so printed and

punctuated as to indicate to incompetent readers how they should be

delivered. Cowper writes--

“He teaches those to read, whom schools dismiss’d,

And colleges, untaught; sells accent, tone,

And emphasis in score, and gives to prayer

The _adagio_ and _andante_ it demands.”

Prospering at this business, Trusler set up a publishing

establishment in Wardour Street, from which he issued manuals

of all kinds, including his most respectable work, _Hogarth

Moralised_, in which Mrs. Hogarth became a partner and collaborator.

At the age of 85 he died in his villa at Englefield Green, Middlesex.

[103] Miss Trusler’s seed and plum cakes were famous. In a judgment

on Mrs. Cornelys for keeping an objectionable house, Sir John

Fielding sagely remarked that her Soho assemblies were unnecessary,

having regard to the many attractions elsewhere, such as “Ranelagh

with its music and fireworks, and Marylebone Gardens, with music,

wine, and plum-cake.”

[104] The arrival of three Cherokee Indian chiefs in the spring of

1762 roused the liveliest interest in London. These braves came

over in token of friendship after the ratification of a treaty

of peace at Charlestown, South Carolina. They were well-made

men, six feet in height, and were dressed, says the _Gentleman’s

Magazine_ (May 1762), “in their own country habit with only a

shirt, trousers, and mantle round them; their faces are painted of

a copper colour, and their heads adorned with shells, feathers,

ear-rings, and other trifling ornaments. They neither of them

can speak to be understood, and very unfortunately lost their

interpreter in their passage. A house is taken for them in Suffolk

Street, and cloaths have been given them in the English fashion.”

Among the thousands of Londoners who went to see the “Cherokee

Kings” was Oliver Goldsmith.

[105] By an indenture dated August 30, 1763. This document, which

Smith’s namesake Thomas Smith quoted in his _History of the Parish

of Marylebone_, shows that the Gardens were attached to the Rose

Tavern, and that they contained walks, statuary, boxes, benches,

and musical appliances and books. Lowe’s lease was for fourteen

years at the annual rent of £170.

[106] Not the well-known Stephen Storace (who was born only in this

year), but his father, a Neapolitan, described by George Hogarth

as “a good performer on the double bass in the band of the Opera

House.”

[107] Nan Catley won hearts by her breezy manner and air of

camaraderie. Hers “was the singing of unequalled animal spirits;

it was Mrs. Jordan’s comedy carried into music.… She was bold,

volatile, audacious” (Boaden: _Life of Mrs. Siddons_).

[108] Long before this, Dick Turpin had appeared in the Garden

itself, and had surprised Mrs. Fountayne, the wife of the

Marylebone schoolmaster, with a kiss. He impudently remarked, “Be

not alarmed, madam; you can now boast that you have been kissed by

Dick Turpin. Good-morning!”

[109] Lowe was now glad to obtain singing engagements at Sadler’s

Wells and other tea-gardens. His career from riches to poverty is

illustrated in the story, told by John Taylor in his _Records of

My Life_, that, soon after becoming master of Marylebone Gardens,

he was seen riding thither in his chariot with a large iron trunk

behind it, which he explained he had purchased “to place the

profits of the Gardens in.” Taylor adds that he had last seen Lowe

in a lane near Aldersgate Street, coming out of a butcher’s shop,

with some meat in a checked handkerchief.

[110] An editorial note in the third edition of the _Rainy Day_

suggests that this name was made popular by Prior’s “Chloe.” This

seems probable, for Prior gave all the vogue of an ideal to this

woman, who, in real life, was the wife of a coachman in Long Acre,

and was described by Johnson as “a despicable drab of the lowest

species.”

[111] See note on Weston, p. 208.

[112] Charles Bannister, the vocalist and actor, father of the more

famous John Bannister.

[113] Signor Giovanni Battista Pergolesi, born near Ancona in the

first decade of the eighteenth century, composed numerous operas

and oratorios. Of the former his _La Serva Padrona_ was revived in

London as late as 1873.

[114] Felix Giardini, a Piedmontese musician, came to England

in 1750, and met with encouragement. He died in Russia in

1793. After hearing him play at Bath, Gainsborough bought his

viol-di-gamba, but was soon disgusted to find that the music

remained with the Italian. Horace Walpole was not enthusiastic

about Giardini as a composer, and advised Mason to employ Handel

to set his _Sappho_. “Your Act is classical Athenian; shall it be

subdi-di-di-vi-vi-vi-ded into modern Italian?”

[115] Dr. Arnold’s appearance at Bow Street was in respect of a

rocket-stick which had descended in the sacrosanct garden of Mrs.

Fountayne.

[116] “To James Winston, Esq. [secretary to the Garrick Club,

and several times mentioned in the diary of John Payne Collier],

I am obliged for the above notices; indeed, to that gentleman’s

disinterested indulgence I am also indebted for many other curious

particulars introduced in this work, selected from his most

extensive and valuable library of English Theatrical Biography,

both in manuscript and in print, a collection formed by himself

during the last thirty years.”--S.

[117] “Torré was a printseller in partnership with the late Mr.

Thane, and lived in Market Lane, Haymarket.”--S.

[118] Dr. William Kenrick, the rampageous critic and playwright.

His comedy _The Duellist_ is his best-remembered work. In July

1774 he began a course of lectures in the “Theatre for Burlettas”

at Marylebone Gardens, which he termed “a School of Shakespeare,”

an entertainment which he also gave at the Devil Tavern in Fleet

Street. Kenrick attacked Dr. Johnson’s Shakespeare. On Goldsmith

saying that he had never heard of Kenrick’s writings, the doctor

replied: “Sir, he is one of the many who have made themselves

public, without making themselves known.”

It is curious that Smith omits to mention Dr. Johnson’s rampageous

visit to the Gardens to see Torré’s fireworks, with his friend

George Steevens, the Shakesperian commentator. It may have taken

place in this year, 1774.

[119] Robert Baddeley began his connection with the stage as cook

to Foote. He was the original Moses in the _School for Scandal_.

It was he who bequeathed £100 to provide the cake and wine which

actors and journalists still consume on Twelfth Night. He is stated

by Dr. Doran to have been the last actor to wear the royal livery

of scarlet, which, as “His Majesty’s Servants,” the Drury Lane

players were entitled to assume.

[120] A posthumous son of Henry Carey, author of “Sally in our

Alley.” “Saville Carey I have heard sometimes touch Nan Catley’s

manner feebly in the famous triumph of her hilarity, ‘Push about

the Jorum’” (Boaden: _Life of Mrs. Siddons_). His worthless

daughter, Nance Carey, bore to one Kean, a tailor, or a builder,

a child whom she neglected and abandoned. This boy became Edmund

Kean, the great actor (Doran’s _Their Majestys’ Servants_, vol. ii.

pp. 523-26).

[121] These initials thinly disguise such well-known entertainers

as Garrick, Bannister, Mrs. Baddeley, and the singers Mr. Darley,

Mr. Vernon, and Nan Catley, all of whom were imitated by the

versatile Carey.

[122] As Abel Drugger, one of his finest parts.

[123] The “Forge of Vulcan” was Signor Torré’s masterpiece; in it

appeared Venus and Cupid in dialogue, in more or less relevant

circumstances of flame and lava.

[124] Fantoccino, the Italian puppet-entertainment, was introduced

to France by an Italian named Marion (hence “marionettes”), and

then into England. The great London Fantoi show of the eighteenth

century was Flockton’s.

Breslaw, the conjurer, began his London appearances in 1772, in

Cockspur Street. In 1774 he gave his entertainment on alternate

days here and at the “King’s Arms” opposite the Royal Exchange.

It is told of him while performing at Canterbury, he promised the

Mayor that if the duration of his licence were extended he would

give one night’s receipts to the poor. The Mayor agreed, and the

conjurer had a full house. Hearing nothing further of the money,

the Mayor called on Breslaw to inquire. The following dialogue

ensued.

“Mr. Mayor, I have distributed the money myself.”

“Pray, sir, to whom?”

“To my own company, than whom none can be poorer.”

“This is a trick!”

“Sir, we live by tricks.”

[125] Baggio Rebecca, decorative painter, died in 1808. Of his

election as Associate of the Royal Academy in 1771, Leslie says:

“Academic advancement was rapid in those days. Every man who

displayed the least ability was certain of election.” Rebecca had

a small share in decorating the Royal Academy lecture-room at

Somerset House.

[126] Most of these localities have ceased to be the resort of

bird-fanciers. To-day the chief London quarters for song-birds are

St. Giles’s, Leadenhall Market, and, above all, Sclater Street in

Spitalfields, known as “Club Row.”

[127] The sights in this famous cockpit are recorded by Hogarth in

his print of 1759, and by Rowlandson in Ackermann’s _Microcosm of

London_ (1808).

Bainbridge Street survives as a narrow lane behind New Oxford

Street, leading from Dyott Street to the back of Meux’s brewery.

At the beginning of the eighteenth century the cockpit behind

Gray’s Inn (its exact locality is not easily discovered), enjoyed

“the only vogue” (Hatton). Mr. William B. Boulton (_The Amusements

of Old London_, 1901) quotes a description of it by Von Uffenbach,

a German traveller, who says it was specially built for the sport.

Pickled-Egg Walk, afterwards Crawford’s Passage (now Crawford

Passage, Ray Street, Clerkenwell), was named after the proprietor

of the Pickled-Egg Tavern, who brought from the West of England

a recipe for pickled eggs and supplied this novel cate to his

customers. Pink mentions a tradition that Charles II. once paused

here in a suburban journey and ate a pickled egg. The mains fought

at the cockpit here were regularly advertised in the newspapers.

Charles Hughes and Charles Dibdin, the song-writer, opened the

“Royal Circus and Equestrian Philharmonic Academy” in 1782.

Cock-fighting was made illegal in 1849, but a statement in _Cocking

and its Votaries_ (1895), by S. A. T. (for private circulation),

makes it quite manifest that “not a few wealthy men in England

still follow up this sport, stealthily but with much zeal--a fact

that is as discreditable to the guardians of the law as it is to

themselves.” I quote Mr. J. Charles Cox in his admirable edition of

Strutt’s _Sports and Pastimes_ (1903).

[128] Behind this formal entry lies the most affecting farewell

scene ever enacted on a London stage. The doors of Drury Lane

Theatre were opened at “half after five” on that evening of June

10, 1776, and the profits of the performance were announced to be

given to the Theatrical Fund. It was but the last of a series of

farewell nights in which Garrick had played his great parts for the

last time to densely crowded houses. As Mr. Percy Fitzgerald says:

“Other actors retire in one night, Garrick’s departure filled a

whole season and only culminated on this last night.” “Last night,”

he wrote, “I played Abel Drugger for the last time. I thought the

audience were cracked, and they almost turned my brain.”

On June 5, King George and his Queen attended to see Garrick’s last

“Richard.” Distinguished people were turned nightly from the doors,

and many became almost frantic to think that they must see Garrick

now or never again. Hannah More wrote: “I pity those who have not

seen him. Posterity will never be able to form the slightest idea

of his perfections.… I have seen him within three weeks take leave

of Benedick, Sir John Brute, Kitely, Abel Drugger, Archer, and

Leon.”

On the last night, of all, Garrick played Don Felix in Mrs.

Centilivre’s comedy, which he chose, perhaps, as a foil to the

tragedy of his farewell. In his Life of the actor Mr. Fitzgerald

thus describes the supreme moment: “He retired slowly--up--up

the stage, his eyes fixed on them with a lingering longing. Then

stopped. The shouts of applause from that brilliant amphitheatre

were broken by sobs and tears. To his ears were borne from many

quarters the word ‘Farewell! Farewell!’ Mrs. Garrick was in her

box, in an agony of hysterical tears. The wonderful eyes, still

brilliant, were turned wistfully again and again to that sea of

sympathetic faces, one of the most brilliant audiences perhaps

that ever sat in Drury Lane; and at last, with an effort, he tore

himself from their view.”

[129] Garrick’s last season at Drury Lane was Mrs. Siddons’ first.

She was but twenty-one years of age, and made no striking success,

though “her type was enlarged in the bill” (Boadley).

[130] A single short fall of lace from the hat has been far from

unfashionable in recent years. Fans were carried later than 1776. A

print of two ladies in outdoor costume in the _Gallery of Fashion_,

published in May 1796, is reproduced by Fairholt, who remarks:

“Both ladies carry the then indispensable article--a fan.” Indeed,

the fashion-plates of the eighteenth century disclose hardly any

period in which fans were not carried out of doors.

[131] Norton Street is now Bolsover Street, running south from near

Portland Road Station, parallel east of Great Portland Street. In

the eighteenth century it had considerable pretensions. From it

Sir William Chambers’s funeral proceeded to the Abbey in March

1796. Wilson, Turner, and Wilkie all painted here. It is now a dull

macadamised street in whose houses upholstering, steel-cutting,

etc., are carried on.

[132] Smith erroneously notes that “this house, subsequently

inhabited by the Duchess of Bolton, Sir John Nicholl, Sir Vicary

Gibbs, and by Sir Charles Flower, Bart., has been recently pulled

down, and several houses built upon the site.” The premises remain

to this day, but they form several houses. As early as 1776

Northouck noted that Baltimore House was “either built without a

plan, or else has had very whimsical owners; for the door has been

shifted to different parts of the house, being now carried into the

stable-yard.”

[133] The map engraved for Northouck’s _History of London in 1772_

shows that Smith was justified in these statements. The unexpected

break in the houses which still occurs on the south side of

Guilford Street is a relic of the desire to leave this square open

to Highgate. This intention was defeated when the north side of

Guilford Street was built. Thenceforward the north-westward growth

of London was rapid, and by 1845 rurality had been pushed up to

Chalk Farm by advancing brick and mortar.

[134] This Italian painter exhibited portraits and water colours

at the Royal Academy from 1774 to 1778. He painted the principal

ceiling at the old East India House.

[135] This painting is said to represent Mary, and her son James

(afterwards James I. of England) as a boy four years of age. Doubts

have been thrown on its history. (See _Gentleman’s Magazine_, vols.

xlviii. and xlix.)

[136] A fortune-teller by tea-leaves, the leaves being “grouted” or

turned over in the cup.

[137] At this time Charles Towneley (1737-1805) was living at No.

7 Park Street (now, with Queen Anne’s Square, named Queen Anne’s

Gate), where he entertained, among others, Sir Joshua Reynolds,

Nollekens, and Johann Zoffany. The Townley collection of Greek

and Roman statues, altars, urns, busts, etc., now in the British

Museum, was freely shown to the public in Park Street.

[138] It was from Mr. Tunnard’s house, on Bankside, that Smith

etched the river procession which brought Nelson’s body to

Whitehall, mentioned in Smith’s note, p. 182.

[139] The manager, and afterwards part proprietor, of Thrale’s

brewery. He hung a fine mezzotint portrait of Johnson in the

counting-house, and when Mrs. Thrale, in Johnson’s presence, asked

him why he had done so, he replied, “Because, madam, I wish to have

one wise man there.” “Sir,” said Johnson, “I thank you. It is a

very handsome compliment, and I believe you speak sincerely.”

[140] The Rev. James Beresford became Rector of Kibworth Beauchamp,

Lincoln, in 1812. He died in 1840.

[141] Elizabeth Carter, of “Epictetus” fame, the friend of Dr.

Johnson. See note, p. 231.

Anna Letitia Barbauld, the well-known miscellaneous writer, whose

poem “Life! I know not what thou art” is her one imperishable

composition.

Angelica Kauffman, the painter (1741-1807). See Smith’s account of

her under the year 1807.

Mrs. Sheridan was the beautiful, clever, and faithful wife of

Richard Brinsley Sheridan, whom she assisted in the management of

Drury Lane Theatre.

Charlotte Lenox, born in New York, 1720, was the author of _The

Life of Harriot Stuart_, in which she portrayed her own youth.

She found interest in high quarters, and was given apartments in

Somerset House, which, however, she lost when that building was

demolished. Dr. Johnson insisted on his friends sitting up all

night at the Devil Tavern to celebrate Mrs. Lenox’s “first literary

child” (_Harriot Stuart_), an immense apple pie being part of the

entertainment. In the morning the waiters were so sleepy that the

party had to wait two hours for their reckoning.

Mrs. Montague, the original “blue stocking,” had little womanly

taste, but her mind was well stored and active; she lived in an

atmosphere of English and foreign talent, and her assemblies at

Montague House, in Portman Square, are historical. Dr. Johnson was

severe on her _Essay on the Writings and Genius of Shakespeare_,

remarking: “Reynolds is fond of her book, and I wonder at it; for

neither I nor Beauclerk nor Mrs. Thrale could get through it.”

Hannah More had appeared in the London literary firmament in 1774;

her tragedy _Percy_ had just been given by Garrick, and her star

was in brightest ascension.

Such was the fame of Mrs. Catherine Macaulay, author of a forgotten

_History of England_, that Dr. Wilson, Rector of St. Stephen’s,

Walbrook, erected a statue to her in the chancel of that church

during her lifetime. It was very properly removed by his successor.

Mrs. Elizabeth Griffith wrote several plays which Garrick presented

with success. _The Letters of Henry and Frances_, which she wrote

in collaboration with her husband, a dramatist, were popular.

[142] At No. 5 (now No. 4) Adelphi Terrace, Garrick lived between

1772 and 1779. He died at about 8 a.m. The house is distinguished

by a commemorative tablet, as also (recently and more artistically)

is his previous residence in Southampton Street, Strand.

[143] Boswell says: “Garrick’s funeral was talked of as

extravagantly expensive, but Dr. Johnson, from his dislike to

exaggeration, would not allow that it was distinguished by an

extraordinary pomp. ‘Were there not six horses to each coach?’

said Mrs. Burney. JOHNSON: ‘Madam, there were no more six horses

than six phœnixes.’” On this Croker notes: “There certainly were,

and Johnson himself went in one of the coach and six.” Richard

Cumberland saw Johnson standing beside the grave, at the foot of

Shakespeare’s statue, bathed in tears. Horace Walpole wrote to the

Countess of Ossory, February 1, 1779: “Yes, madam, I do think the

pomp of Garrick’s funeral perfectly ridiculous,” and he gave his

reasons with epigrammatic force. Others were of the same opinion;

and John Henderson, the actor, wrote “a rather bitter impromptu

on Mr. Garrick’s Funeral,” in which Garrick is represented as

directing the pageant.

“‘Call all my carpenters--bid George attend.

And ransack Monmouth Street from end to end;

Buy all the black, defraud the starving moth.

Or let him, if he will, defile the cloth:

Bring moth and all--we have no time to lose--

If there’s not black enough, then buy the blues.’

…

Thus far he spoke, in an imperial tone,

And quite forgot the funeral was his own.”

[144] Antonio Zucchi, A.R.A., who became Angelica Kauffmann’s

second husband, was employed by the brothers Adam, the architects

of the Adelphi. The cost of the mantelpiece is given by Mr.

Wheatley as £300, the probable figure. Mrs. Garrick died in the

same house in 1822.

[145] The “English Grotto,” as it was called, was one of the

Islington group of tea-gardens. Its proprietor, Jackson, pleased

his public by an ingenious water-mill, an “enchanted fountain,” and

a display of gold and silver fish. A pleasingly rustic view in the

Crace collection is reproduced by Mr. Wroth in _London Pleasure

Gardens of the Eighteenth Century_.

[146] Francesco Bartolozzi, R.A., was an original member of the

Royal Academy, and he engraved its diploma. His rapid rise, and

his appointment to be engraver to the King at £300 a year, were

disturbing to Sir Robert Strange, who treated him with misplaced

contempt. “Let Strange beat that if he can,” exclaimed Bartolozzi,

on executing his “Clytia.” Unfortunately he was improvident, and

his studio became a manufactory of facile chalk studies, to many of

which he put only the finishing touches. After a brilliant career

in England, he went to Lisbon, where he was knighted, and died

there in 1815, in his 88th year.

[147] John Hinchliffe (1731-94), the son of a livery-stable

keeper in Swallow Street, was born in Westminster, and educated

at Westminster School. He was consecrated Bishop of Peterborough,

Dec. 17, 1769. He bought some of Smith’s youthful imitations of

Rembrandt and Ostade. A note on Sherwin will be found under 1782.

[148] In 1781, Mary Robinson (1758-1800), known as “Perdita,”

had ceased to be the mistress of the Prince of Wales, afterwards

George IV., whose bond for £20,000, never paid, was exchanged for

the pension of £500 a year awarded her by Fox in 1783. She was

portrayed by Reynolds twice, and by Romney, Gainsborough, Hoppner,

Zoffany, and twice by Cosway.

The original name of Mrs. Robinson’s family had been M’Dermott,

which had been changed by an ancestor to Darby. Mrs. Darby had

brought up her daughter under difficult circumstances. Obliged

to earn her own living during her husband’s absence in America,

she started a ladies’ boarding school in Little Chelsea, in which

the future “Perdita” (as we learn from her autobiography) taught

English literature to the daughters of the well-to-do citizens, and

read to them “sacred and moral lessons on saints’ days and Sunday

evenings.” The “high personage” referred to in this paragraph is of

course the Prince, in whom Richard Cosway, the courtly miniaturist,

found a lavish patron.

[149] Anticipating, on a higher scale, Dickens’s servant-girl

bride, who, on stepping into a hackney-coach after the ceremony,

“threw a red shawl, which she had, no doubt, brought on purpose,

negligently over the number on the door, evidently to delude

pedestrians into the belief that the hackney-coach was a private

carriage” (_Sketches by Boz_).

[150] Smith’s first master, John Keyse Sherwin, had been a pupil of

Bartolozzi. In his studio in St. James’s Street, he was patronised

by the Duchesses of Devonshire and Rutland, Lady Jersey, and other

ladies of rank, many of whom were eager to figure in his drawing

of “The Finding of Moses,” in which the Princess Royal appeared as

Pharaoh’s daughter. He was a wonderfully skilful portrait artist:

“I have often seen him,” says Smith, “begin at the toe, draw

upwards, and complete it at the top of the head in a most correct

and masterly manner. He had also an extraordinary command over the

use of both his hands.” He was an irregular worker, however, and

debt and dissipation helped to kill him at the age of 39.

The sitting given to Sherwin by Mrs. Siddons took place soon after

her re-appearance at Drury Lane Theatre, the beginning of her real

fame, October 10, 1782. After opening with Isabella in Garrick’s

version of _The Fatal Marriage_, she played Euphrasia in _The

Grecian Daughter_.

[151] William Henderson, a collector, lived at No. 33 Charlotte

Street, Fitzroy Square, where he was the neighbour of Constable.

[152] Mathews’ collection, the formation of which had been the

passion of his later years, was not dispersed. It consisted almost

entirely of portraits, and on these he is said to have laid out

about £5000. For their accommodation the younger Mathews built a

special gallery for his father at Ivy Cottage, Kentish Town, from

a design by Pugin. In gratifying his tastes, Mathews found that

he had sacrificed his privacy to sight-seers; the rural cottage

in which he had sought peace became a show-place. The collection

ultimately passed to the Garrick Club.

[153] Apparently Smith refers to his will, as it then existed; but,

as a matter of fact, he left no will. On his death, letters of

administration were granted to his widow, the value of his estate

being only £100. The second of the two witnesses was doubtless John

Pritt Harley. See note, p. 321.

[154] John Charles Crowle of Fryston Hall, Wakefield, lawyer

and antiquary, was a member of the Dilettanti Society, and its

Secretary, 1774-78. He was a noted joker and boon companion, and

left a tangible proof of his interest in art and antiquity in the

illustrated and interleaved copy of Pennant’s _History of London_

which he bequeathed to the British Museum. He died in 1811.

[155] Rats’ Castle is described by Smith in his _Nollekens_ as “a

shattered house then standing on the east side of Dyot Street, and

so called from the rat-catchers and canine snackers who inhabited

it, and where they cleaned the skins of those unfortunate stray

dogs who had suffered death the preceding night.” Nollekens

obtained models for his Venuses from Mrs. Lobb, an elderly lady in

a green calash, at the Fan Tavern in Dyot Street. This street was

named after Richard Dyot, a parishioner of St. Giles-in-the-Fields.

“The name was changed to George Street in consequence of a filthy

song which attained wide popularity, but the original name was

restored in 1877” (Wheatley).

[156] This inscription appears to be incorrect. An editorial

note to the 1845 (second) edition of the _Rainy Day_ points out

that this well-known beggar died April 25, 1788, and that the

_Gentleman’s Magazine_ recorded his death thus: “In Bridewell,

where he was confined a second time as a vagrant, the man known by

the name of Old Simon, who for many years has gone about this city

covered with rags, clouted shoes, three old hats upon his head,

and his fingers full of brass rings. On the following day, the

Coroner’s Inquest sat on his body, and brought in their verdict,

‘Died by the visitation of God.’”

[157] Dr. John Gardner, a well-known character, erected his tomb in

the churchyard of St. Leonard’s, Shoreditch, some years before his

death, and inscribed it:

A Book for a Rainy Day; or, Recollections of the Events of the Years 1766-1833 · 第 86 / 92 题