THE NEW PARADISE.

No Gentlemen or Ladies to be admitted with nails in their

shoes.[33]

For the information of the collectors of Bunbury’s prints, I beg to

state that there is in Mrs. Banks’s collection of visiting cards, etc.,

in the British Museum, a small etching said to have been his very first

attempt when at Westminster School. It represents a fellow riding a hog,

brandishing a birch-broom by way of a baster, with another at a short

distance, hallooing.

As Mr. Walpole is silent as to Jonathan Richardson’s place of interment,

the biographical collector will find the following inscription in the

burial-ground behind the Foundling Hospital, belonging to the parish of

St. George the Martyr:--

Elizabeth Richardson,

Died 24th Dec. 1767,

Aged 74 years.

Jonathan Richardson,

Died 10th June, 1771,

Aged 77; both of this parish.[34]

1771.

The gaiety during the merry month of May was to me most delightful; my

feet, though I knew nothing of the positions, kept pace with those of the

blooming milkmaids, who danced round their garlands of massive plate,

hired from the silversmiths to the amount of several hundreds of pounds,

for the purpose of placing round an obelisk, covered with silk fixed upon

a chairman’s horse. The most showy flowers of the season were arranged

so as to fill up the openings between the dishes, plates, butter-boats,

cream-jugs, and tankards. This obelisk was carried by two chairmen in

gold-laced hats, six or more handsome milkmaids in pink and blue gowns,

drawn through the pocket-holes, for they had one on either side: yellow

or scarlet petticoats, neatly quilted, high-heeled shoes, mob-caps, with

lappets of lace resting on their shoulders; nosegays in their bosoms,

and flat Woffington hats, covered with ribbons of every colour. But what

crowned the whole of the display was a magnificent silver tea-urn which

surmounted the obelisk, the stand of which was profusely decorated with

scarlet tulips. A smart, slender fellow of a fiddler, commonly wearing

a sky-blue coat, with his hat profusely covered with ribbons, attended;

and the master of the group was accompanied by a constable, to protect

the plate from too close a pressure of the crowd, when the maids danced

before the doors of his customers.[35]

One of the subjects selected by Mr. Jonathan Tyers, for the artists who

decorated the boxes for supper-parties in Vauxhall Gardens,[36] was that

of Milkmaids on May-day. In that picture (which, with the rest painted

by Hayman and his pupils, has lately disappeared) the garland of plate

was carried by a man on his head; and the milkmaids, who danced to the

music of a wooden-legged fiddler, were extremely elegant. They had

ruffled cuffs, and their gowns were not drawn through their pocket-holes

as in my time; their hats were flat, and not unlike that worn by Peg

Woffington, but bore a nearer shape to those now in use by some of the

fish-women at Billingsgate. In Captain M. Laroon’s _Cries of London_,

published by Tempest, there is a female entitled “A Merry Milkmaid.”[37]

She is dancing with a small garland of plate upon her head; and from her

dress I conclude that the Captain either made his drawing in the latter

part of King William III.’s reign, or at the commencement of that of

Queen Anne.

1772.

My dear mother’s declining state of health urged my father to consult Dr.

Armstrong,[38] who recommended her to rise early and take milk at the

cowhouse. I was her companion then; and I well remember that, after we

had passed Portland Chapel, there were fields all the way on either side.

The highway was irregular, with here and there a bank of separation;

and that when we had crossed the New Road, there was a turnstile (called

in an early plan, which I have seen since, “The White House”), at the

entrance of a meadow leading to a little old public-house, the sign of

the “Queen’s Head and Artichoke”: it was much weather-beaten, though

perhaps once a tolerably good portrait of Queen Elizabeth. The house was

reported to have been kept by one of Her Majesty’s gardeners.[39]

A little beyond a nest of small houses contiguous, was another turnstile

opening also into fields, over which we walked to the Jew’s Harp House,

Tavern and Tea Gardens.[40] It consisted of a large upper room, ascended

by an outside staircase, for the accommodation of the company on ball

nights; and in this room large parties dined. At the south front of

these premises was a large semicircular enclosure with boxes for tea and

ale drinkers, guarded by deal-board soldiers between every box, painted

in proper colours. In the centre of this opening were tables and seats

placed for the smokers. On the eastern side of the house there was a

trapball-ground; the western side served for a tennis-hall; there were

also public and private skittle-grounds. Behind this tavern were several

small tenements, with a pretty good portion of ground to each. On the

south of the tea-gardens a number of summer-houses and gardens, fitted up

in the truest Cockney taste; for on many of these castellated edifices

wooden cannons were placed; and at the entrance of each domain, of about

the twentieth part of an acre, the old inscription of “Steel-traps and

spring-guns _all over_ these grounds,” with an “N.B. Dogs trespassing

will be shot.”

In these rural retreats the tenant was usually seen on Sunday evening

in a bright scarlet waistcoat, ruffled shirt, and silver shoe-buckles,

comfortably taking his tea with his family, honouring a Seven-Dial friend

with a nod on his peregrination to the famed Wells of Kilburn. Willan’s

farm,[41] the extent of my mother’s walk, stood at about a quarter of a

mile south; and I remember that the room in which she sat to take the

milk was called “Queen Elizabeth’s Kitchen,” and that there was some

stained glass in the windows.

On our return we crossed the New Road; and, after passing the back of

Marylebone Gardens,[42] entered London immediately behind the elegant

mansions on the north side of Cavendish Square. This Square was enclosed

by a dwarf brick wall, surmounted by heavy wooden railing. Harley Fields

had for years been resorted to by thousands of people, to hear the

celebrated Mr. George Whitefield, whose wish, like that of Wesley, when

preaching on execution days at Kennington Common, was to catch the ears

of the idlers. I should have noticed Kendall’s farm,[43] which in 1746

belonged to a farmer of the name of Bilson, a pretty large one, where I

have seen eight or ten immense hay-ricks all on a row; it stood on the

site of the commencement of the present Osnaburg Street, nearly opposite

the “Green Man,” originally called the “Farthing Pie House.”[44]

[Illustration: “SING _TANTARARA_--VAUXHALL! VAUXHALL!”]

To the honour of our climate, which is often abused, perhaps no country

can produce instances of longevity equal to those of England of this

year, viz.:--at 100, 2; 101, 5; 102, 6; 103, 3; 105, 4; 106, 3; 107, 4;

108, 5; 109, 4; 110, 2; 111, 2; 112, 3; 114, 1; 118, 1; 125, Rice, a

cooper in Southwark; 133, Mrs. Keithe, at Newnham, in Gloucestershire;

138, the widow Chun, at Ophurst, near Lichfield.[45]

1773.

The “Mother Red-cap,” at Kentish Town, was a house of no small terror

to travellers in former times. This house was lately taken down, and

another inn built on its site; however, the old sign of “Mother Red-cap”

is preserved on the new building. It has been stated that Mother Red-cap

was the “Mother Damnable” of Kentish Town in early days; and that it was

at her house the notorious “Moll Cut-purse,” the highway-woman of the

time of Oliver Cromwell, dismounted and frequently lodged.[46]

As few persons possess so retentive a memory as myself, I make no doubt

that many will be pleased with my recollections of the state of Tottenham

Court Road at this time. I shall commence at St. Giles’s churchyard, in

the northern wall of which there was a gateway of red and brown brick.

Over this gate, under its pediment, was a carved composition of the Last

Judgment, not borrowed from Michael Angelo, but from the workings of

the brain of some ship-carver.[47] This was and is still admired by the

generality of ignorant observers, as much as Mr. Charles Smith[48] the

sculptor’s “Love among the Roses” is by the well-informed; and, perhaps,

a more correct assertion was never made than that by the late worthy Rev.

James Bean,[49] when speaking of an itinerant musician, “that bad music

was as agreeable to a bad ear as that of Corelli or Pergolesi was to

persons who understood the science.”

At this gate stood for many years an eccentric but inoffensive old man

called “Simon,” some account of whom will be found in a future page.

Nearly on the site of the new gate, in which this _basso relievo_ has

been most conspicuously placed, stood a very small old house towards

Denmark Street, tottering for several years whenever a heavy carriage

rolled through the street, to the great terror of those who were at the

time passing by.

I must not forget to observe that I recollect the building of most of the

houses at the north end of New Compton Street (Dean Street and Compton

Street, Soho, were named in compliment to Bishop Compton, Dean of St.

Paul’s, who held the living of St. Anne), and I also remember a row of

six small almshouses, surrounded by a dwarf brick wall, standing in the

middle of High Street.[50]

On the left-hand of High Street, passing on to Tottenham Court Road,

there were four handsomely finished brick houses, with grotesque masks

on the key-stones above the first-floor windows, probably erected in

the reign of Queen Anne. These houses have lately been rebuilt without

the masks; fortunately my reader may be gratified with a sight of such

ornaments in Queen Square, Westminster.[51] There is a set of engravings

of masks, of a small quarto size, considered as the designs of Michael

Angelo; and in the sale of Mr. Moser, the first keeper of the Royal

Academy, which took place at Hutchinson’s in 1783, were several plaster

casts, considered to be taken from models by him. The next object of

notoriety is a large circular boundary stone, let into the pavement in

the middle of the highway, exactly where Oxford Street and Tottenham

Court Road meet in a right angle. When the charity boys of St. Giles’s

parish walk the boundaries, those who have deserved flogging are whipped

at this stone, in order that, as they grow up, they may remember the

place, and be competent to give evidence should any dispute arise with

the adjoining parishes. Near this stone stood St. Giles’s Pound.[52]

Two old houses stood near this spot on the eastern side of the street,

where the entrance gates of Meux’s brewery have been erected: between the

second-floor windows of one of them the following inscription was cut in

stone: “Opposite this house stood St. Giles’s Pound.” This spot has been

rendered popular by a song, attributed to the pen of a Mr. Thompson, an

actor of the Drury Lane Company:

“On Newgate steps Jack Chance was found,

Bred up near St. Giles’s Pound.”[53]

The ground behind the north-west end of Russell Street was occupied by a

farm occupied by two old maiden sisters of the name of Capper. They wore

riding-habits, and men’s hats; one rode an old grey mare, and it was her

spiteful delight to ride with a large pair of shears after boys who were

flying their kites, purposely to cut their strings; the other sister’s

business was to seize the clothes of the lads who trespassed on their

premises to bathe.[54]

From Capper’s farm were several straggling houses; but the principal part

of the ground to the “King’s Head,” at the end of the road, was unbuilt

upon. The “Old King’s Head” forms a side object in Hogarth’s beautiful

and celebrated picture of the “March to Finchley,” which may be seen with

other fine specimens of art in the Foundling Hospital, for the charitable

donation of one shilling.

I shall now recommence on the left-hand side of the road, noticing that

on the front of the first house, No. 1, in Oxford Street, near the

second-floor windows, is the following inscription cut in stone: OXFORD

STREET, 1725. In Aggas’s plan of London, engraved in the beginning of the

reign of Queen Elizabeth, the commencement of this street is designated

“The Waye to Uxbridge”; farther on in the same plan the highway is called

“Oxford Road.” Hanway Street, better known by the vulgar people under

the name of HANOVER YARD, was at this time the resort of the highest

fashion for mercery and other articles of dress. The public-house, the

sign of the “Blue Posts,” at the corner of Hanway Street, in Tottenham

Court Road, was once kept by a man of the name of Sturges, deep in the

knowledge of chess, upon which game he published a little work, as is

acknowledged on his tombstone in St. James’s burial-ground, Hampstead

Road.[55] From the “Blue Posts” the houses were irregularly built to a

large space called Gresse’s Gardens, thence to Windmill Street, strongly

recommended by physicians for the salubrity of the air. The premises

occupied by the French charity children were held by the founders of the

Middlesex Hospital, which were established in 1755, where the patients

remained until the present building was erected in Charles Street.

Colvill Court, parallel with Windmill Street northward, was built in

1766; and Goodge Street,[56] farther on, was, I conjecture, erected

much about the same time. Mr. Whitefield’s chapel was built in 1754,

upon the site of an immense pond, called THE LITTLE SEA. This pond, so

called, is inserted in Pine and Tinney’s plan of London, published in

1742, and also in the large one issued by the same persons in 1746.[57]

Beyond the chapel[58] the four dwellings, then called “Paradise Row,”

almost terminated the houses on that side. A turnstile opened into

Crab-tree Fields.[59] They extended to the “Adam and Eve” public-house,

the original appearance of which Hogarth has also introduced into his

picture of the “March to Finchley.” It was at this house that the famous

pugilistic skill of Broughton and Slack was publicly exhibited, upon an

uncovered stage, in a yard open to the North Road.[60]

[Illustration: GEORGE WHITEFIELD

“Fain would I die preaching.”]

The rare and beautiful etching of the before-mentioned picture by Hogarth

was the production of Luke Sullivan,[61] a native of Ireland, but how

he acquired his knowledge of art I have not been able to learn; most

probably he was of Dame Nature’s school, where pupils can be taught

gratis the whole twenty-four hours of every day as long as the world

lasts. Sullivan’s talents were not confined to the art of engraving;

he was, in my humble opinion, the most extraordinary of all miniature

painters. I have three or four of his productions, one of which was so

particularly fine, that I could almost say I have it on my retina at

this moment. It was the portrait of a most lovely woman as to features,

flesh, and blood. She was dressed in a pale green silk gown, lapelled

with straw-coloured satin; and in order to keep up a sweetness of tone,

the artist had placed primroses in her stomacher; the sky was of a warm

green, which blended harmoniously with the carnations of her complexion;

her hair was jet, and her necklace of pearls.

Lord Orford, whose early attachment to the sleepy-eyed beauties of King

Charles II.’s Court, and those with the lascivious leer of that of Louis

XIV., as may be inferred by their numerous portraits in the cabinets at

Strawberry Hill, would no doubt have preferred his favourites, Cooper

and Petitot--names eternally, and many times unjustly, extolled by the

admirers of their works to the injury of our artists, whose talents

equal, if not surpass, those of every country put together, in, I think

I may say, every branch of the fine arts. Upon this too general opinion

of the pre-eminence of Petitot, I have now and then had a battle with Mr.

Paul Fischer, the miniature painter, who certainly has produced some most

highly finished and excellent likenesses of the Royal Family and several

persons of fashion, particularly of King George IV. and Sir Wathen

Waller, Bart.[62]

Notwithstanding Tottenham Court Road was so infested by the lowest order,

who kept what they called a Gooseberry Fair,[63] it was famous at certain

times of the year, particularly in summer, for its booths of regular

theatrical performers, who deserted the empty benches of Drury Lane

Theatre, under the mismanagement of Mr. Fleetwood,[64] and condescended

to admit the audience at sixpence each. Mr. Yates, and several other

eminent performers, had their names painted on their booths.

The whole of the ground north from Capper’s farm, at the back of the

British Museum, so often mentioned as being frequented by duellists, was

in irregular patches, many fields with turnstiles. The pipes of the New

River Company were propped up in several parts to the height of six and

eight feet, so that persons walked under them to gather watercresses,

which grew in great abundance and perfection, or to visit the “Brothers’

Steps,” well known to the Londoners. Of these steps there are many

traditionary stories; the one generally believed is, that two brothers

were in love with a lady, who would not declare a preference for either,

but coolly sat upon a bank to witness the termination of a duel, which

proved fatal to both. The bank, it is said, on which she sat, and the

footmarks of the brothers when pacing the ground, never produced grass

again. The fact is that these steps were so often trodden that it was

impossible for the grass to grow. I have frequently passed over them;

they were in a field on the site of Mr. Martin’s chapel, or very nearly

so, and not on the spot as communicated to Miss Porter, who has written

an entertaining novel on the subject.[65]

Aubrey, in his _Miscellanies_, states: “The last summer, on the day of

St. John Baptist (1694), I accidentally was walking in the pasture behind

Montague House; it was twelve o’clock. I saw there about two or three and

twenty young women, most of them well habited, on their knees very busie,

as if they had been weeding. I could not presently learn what the matter

was; at last a young man told me that they were looking for a coal under

the root of a plantain to put under their heads that night, and they

should dream who would be their husbands. It was to be found that day and

hour.”[66]

[Illustration: JOHN RANN

“Sixteen String Jack.”]

1774.

I well remember when, in my eighth year, my father’s playfellow, Mr.

Joseph Nollekens, leading me by the hand to the end of John Street, to

see the notorious terror of the king’s highways, John Rann, commonly

called Sixteen-string Jack, on his way to execution at Tyburn, for

robbing Dr. Bell, Chaplain to the Princess Amelia, in Gunnesbury Lane.

The Doctor died a Prebendary of Westminster. It was pretty generally

reported that the sixteen strings worn by this freebooter at his

knees were in allusion to the number of times he had been acquitted.

Fortunately for the Boswell illustrators, there is an etched portrait

of him; for, be it known, thief as he was, he had the honour of being

recorded by Dr. Johnson.[67] Rann was a smart fellow, a great favourite

with a certain description of _ladies_, and had been coachman to Lord

Sandwich, when his Lordship resided in the south-east corner-house of

Bedford Row. The malefactor’s coat was a bright pea-green; he had an

immense nosegay, which he had received from the hand of one of the frail

sisterhood, whose practice it was in those days to present flowers to

their favourites from the steps of St. Sepulchre’s church, as the

last token of what they called their attachment to the condemned,[68]

whose worldly accounts were generally brought to a close at Tyburn, in

consequence of their associating with abandoned characters. On our return

home, Mr. Nollekens, stooping close to my ear, assured me that, had his

father-in-law, Mr. Justice Welch, been high constable, we could have

walked all the way to Tyburn by the side of the cart.[69]

At this time houses in High Street, Marylebone, particularly on the

western side, continued to be inhabited by families who kept their

coaches, and who considered themselves as living in the country, and

perhaps their family affairs were as well known as they could have been

had they resided at Kilburn.[70] In Marylebone, great and wealthy people

of former days could hardly stir an inch without being noticed; indeed,

so lately as the year 1728, the _Daily Journal_ assured the public that

“many persons arrived in London from their country-houses in Marylebone”;

and the same publication, dated October 15th, conveys the following

intelligence:--

“The Right Hon. Sir Robert Walpole comes to town this day from Chelsea.”

The following lines were inserted by the late Sir William Musgrave, in

his _Adversaria_ (No. 5721):--

“Sir Robert Walpole in great haste

Cryed, ‘Where’s my fellow gone?’

It was answered by a man of taste,

‘Your fellow, Sir, there’s none.’”

One Sunday morning my mother allowed me, before we entered the little

church[71] in High Street, Marylebone, to stand to see the young

gentlemen of Mr. Fountayne’s boarding-school cross the road, while the

bell was chiming for sacred duties. I remember well a summer’s sun shone

with full refulgence at the time, and my youthful eyes were dazzled with

the various colours of the dresses of the youths, who walked two and

two, some in pea-green, others sky-blue, and several in the brightest

scarlet; many of them wore gold-laced hats, while the flowing locks of

others, at that time allowed to remain uncut at schools, fell over

their shoulders. To the best of my recollection, the scholars amounted

to about one hundred. As the pleasurable and often idle scenes of my

schoolboy days are pictured upon my retina whenever Crouch End, or the

name of my venerable master, Norton,[72] are mentioned, and as others may

feel similar delight with respect to the places at which they received

their early education, I shall endeavour to gratify a few of my readers

by a description of the house and playground of Mr. Fountayne’s academy.

For this purpose it may not be irrelevant to notice something of the

antiquity of that once splendid mansion, in which so many persons have

passed their early and innocent hours.

Topographers who mention Marylebone Park inform us that foreign

ambassadors were in the time of Queen Elizabeth and James I. amused there

by hunting, and that the oldest parts of this school were the remains of

the palace in which they were entertained. The earliest topographical

representation which I am enabled to instance, is a drawing made by

Joslin, dated 1700, formerly in the possession of his Grace the Duke

of Buckingham, of which I published an etching. It comprehends the

field-gate and palace, its surrounding walls and adjacent buildings in

Marylebone to the south-west, including a large mansion, which in all

probability had been Oxford House, the grand receptacle of the Harleian

Library. Fortune, I am sorry to say, has not favoured me with the power

of continuing the declining history of the palace to the period at which

it became an academy, nor can I discover the time in which Monsieur de

la Place first occupied it.[73] A daughter of De la Place married the

Rev. Mr. Fountayne,[74] whose name the school retained until its final

demolition in 1791, at which period I remember seeing the large stone

balls taken from the brick piers of the gates.

Of this house, when a school, I recollect a miserably executed plate

by Roberts, probably for some magazine; there is also a quarto plate

displaying a knowledge in perspective, engraved by G. T. Parkyns, from

a drawing by J. C. Barrow;[75] but the most interesting, and I must

consider the most correct, are four drawings made by Michael Angelo

Rooker,[76] formerly in my possession, but now in the illustrated copy

of Pennant’s _London_ in the British Museum.[77] These have enabled me

to insert the following description of a few parts of the mansion.

The first drawing is a view of the principal and original front of the

palace, or manor-house, with other buildings open to the playground;

it was immediately within the wall on the east side of the road, then

standing upon the site of the present Devonshire Mews. This house

consisted of an immense body and two wings, a projecting porch in

the front, and an enormously deep dormer roof, supported by numerous

cantilevers, in the centre of which there was, within a very bold

pediment, a shield surmounted by foliage with labels below it. The second

drawing exhibits the back, or garden front, which consisted of a flat

face with a bay window at each end, glazed in quarries;[78] the wall of

the back front terminated with five gables. In the midst of some shrubs

stands a tall, lusty gentleman dressed in black, with a white Busby-wig

and a three-cornered hat, possibly intended for the figure of the Rev.

Mr. Fountayne, as he is directing the gardener to distribute some plants.

The third drawing, which is taken from the hall, exhibits the grand

staircase, the first flight of which consisted of sixteen steps; the

hand-rails were supported with richly carved perforated foliage, from its

style, probably of the period of Inigo Jones. The fourth drawing consists

of the decorations of the staircase, which was tessellated. This mansion

was wholly of brick, and surmounted by a large turret containing the

clock and bell. Mr. Fountayne was noticed by Handel as well as Clarke,

the celebrated Greek scholar.[79] These gentlemen frequently indulged

in musical parties, which were attended by persons of rank and worth, as

well as fashion and folly.

[Illustration: LONDON BEGGARS

A Book for a Rainy Day; or, Recollections of the Events of the Years 1766-1833 · 第 12 / 92 题