EXPLAINED,

WITH PREFATORY REMARKS, &c. &c.

-------

TURKS are said to assign as a reason for not wearing Hats, that they are

put together by _witchcraft_. There is certainly a great deal of

ingenuity in the practice, and some _effects_ produced whose _causes_

are as yet unexplained: but, with all due deference to these _turban

gentlemen_, it is presumed that they have objections beyond what is

above stated, some of which are as follows:—_First_, their country is

destitute of the most essential material—FUR. _Second_, the climate

being extremely sultry, stoves, irons, and scalding water are not likely

to become favourites. _Thirdly_, being compelled by their religion to

keep their heads _close shaved_, a Hat, above all human inventions,

would be the most ridiculous covering _they_ could adopt.

There are many opinions as to the time Hats were first invented, and,

very probably, all equally erroneous. Some carry the date as far back as

the foundation of Christianity, attributing the merit to St. Luke, of

whom it is said, that he, having tender feet, put a layer of hair or fur

between them and his sandals, in which situation friction and moisture

caused such an interweaving of particles, that the whole became strongly

united, or (technically called) FELTED. Whether the story, as applied to

Luke, be true or false, is immaterial; but that such did happen with

some one, is very likely; nor is it at all unlikely, but that an

occurrence of this kind did really give the first idea of Hat-making.

Having remarked thus much, I shall next proceed to state, what is not

the less true than surprising, which is, that of the various branches of

manufacture which this country is so highly distinguished for, none are

less understood than Hat-making; nay, there is not one person in fifty

who, if he were asked the question, could tell whether a Hat was or was

not a _woven_ substance; nor is there one in 500 but what suppose that

the _skin_ of a hare or rabbit is worked with the fur _attached_ to it,

as in the natural state; and, to form a correct judgment of the external

material, when manufactured, whether it be hair, wool, or beaver,

although many pretend, none are really competent but those _experienced_

in the _trade_.

To show the absurd notions some entertain on this matter, I state as a

fact, that I do not know a manufacturer or seller in the trade but what

has been applied to, by some one or other, to have a _Beaver_ Hat made

from a _hare_’s skin. Nay, I remember once offending a very good

customer, and a man not wanting for sense either, by an involuntary

burst of laughter, on his presenting the skin of a _French lap-dog_ for

the very same purpose.

It is no uncommon thing for persons who are on pretty good terms with

their capabilities to give opinions as to the _merits_ or _demerits_ of

a Hat; which opinions are as opposite to the true state of the case as

the sun’s rays to a state of darkness. I shall give an instance,

although a trifling one, of a very common error among persons who

_suppose_ themselves to have a knowledge of the subject, which is this,

if the picker has not a very good eye, some of the larger hairs will be

left in the Hat, and consequently the most _visible_; these are directly

termed “_grey hairs_,” when the truth is, that they are the _blackest_

in the whole composition; but being thicker than the general mass, they

receive a greater portion of _light_, which is mistaken for a grey

colour: an easy method of proving the fact is to pull one of these _grey

hairs_ from the Hat, and place it on a piece of white paper, the

_contrast_ will decide the question.

Again, whatever produces a glutinization of the NAP, is said to be the

effect of the stiffening; this is not true in every case, for it is

frequently owing to improper management in placing the Hat, when wet,

before a large fire, which should never be done; the better way is, if

very wet, to hang it up without brushing or wiping, and when dry it is

easily put to rights, by gently passing over a clothes brush: if only

slightly wet, wipe it with a handkerchief, and, when dry, it will brush

clean. But the great fault with most persons is to put on their Hats,

day after day, in the same _dirty state_ as when taken off at night;

from which it is natural to infer, that there must be a vast

accumulation of dirt; it is this dirt, when exposed to the rain, that

forms a sort of cement, or paste, having all the appearance of what is

commonly called “_gum_.”

Another proof of erroneous judgment—Profuse perspiration of the head is

what many are subject to; by reason of which, from the frequency of

wearing, and the _porosity_ of the Hat, there is a continual absorption

of moisture going on until it becomes completely _saturated_,

particularly in front, the consequence is, that the nap lies buried in a

greasy matter, which matter is also, but very inappropriately termed

_gum_ or _stiffening_, when in point of fact it is _neither_, for the

very same effect would, under the like circumstances, be produced, and

in much less time, if the Hat were not stiffened at all. The best remedy

for this is a piece of thin flannel under the leather, and that

frequently changed.

There is nothing so detrimental to a Hat as a severe exposure to rain on

the first, second, or even third time of wearing; for this reason, the

materials wherewith it is composed are in a manner quite _green_, and

require _seasoning_; to effect which it should be frequently put on in

dry weather. I have always found that a Hat, constantly worn for five or

six weeks _without being wet_, underwent every sort of hardship

afterwards with little or no injury, retaining at the same time its

beauty—form—and wearing _three times longer_ than it otherwise would

have done. It may be asked, why not, to prevent accidents, render the

Hat _water-proof_? that is, impervious to the action of either

atmosphere or rain. The thing is easy enough, I admit; but where there

is a choice of only _two evils_, it is always best to select the

_least_. We all know (or should know) that if a man were to enclose

himself, arms, legs, and body, in what is called an _oil-skin dress_,

and that drawn close round the neck, the whole tightly fitted to every

part of his person as a Hat is to the head, the most unpleasant

consequences would ensue; the cause why is obviously this, the

exhalations of the body, particularly in a state of exertion, would when

so _enclosed_, be either prevented from flying off, as nature requires,

or otherwise checked altogether; precisely so with the head if the

porosity of the Hat was destroyed, which it must be to resist

effectually the action of water. This deduction must be so clear and

self-evident that further reasoning is unnecessary. Another great

objection against water-proof _Hats_ is, that the ingredients made use

of for such purposes, when exposed to the sun’s heat, are so acted upon

as to cause a _decomposition_ of the colour, and nine times in ten, the

Hat, before it is half worn out, becomes any thing but what it was meant

to be.

It is astonishing to hear the number of qualifications a Hat is _said_

to have, and each as opposite to the other as it is possible for any two

things to be; some, for instance, maintain that it cannot be good unless

it is _light_, others again will decidedly condemn it for _being so_,

insisting that the chief recommendation is its being firm and _stout_.

All that is requisite to be observed on this, is that _weight_ has no

more to do with the _quality_ of a Hat, than the situation of prime

minister has to do with the cramming of turkies. A very inferior Hat may

be made _equally light_ with the most superior, and in both cases the

cost of manufacture will be less than if they were made _stout_.

The length of the beaver too is another point on which the difference of

opinion is often experienced; many are for very _short naps_, declaring

all others to be outrageously vulgar; but the majority of wearers seem

best pleased with _long_ naps, which always _take_ and _retain_ the best

_black_, while, on the contrary those that are very short never do. A

medium between the two is the most preferable.

Having stated thus much, I shall next proceed to explain in what way a

fine Hat is _made_, describing as accurately as possible the various

processes it undergoes, as also the materials with which it is composed,

the proportions of each as well as the quantity of work a man is capable

of doing, whether _maker_ or _finisher_, in a week, the amount of wages,

together with some of the curious regulations, by-laws, &c. &c. &c.

In the first place, as I shall have occasion to mention a few of the

_implements_ by name, a short description of them may not be amiss.

There is the BOW, which in form is not unlike what is used for playing

on a _double bass_, but in length and thickness is equal to a

constable’s staff; there is a bridge at each end, from one to the other

of which is tightly strung a stout line of _catgut_.

The HURDLE is situate in what is called the bow garret, and is a sort of

_table_, on which the _fur_ is bowed, or mixed, having the farther end

and sides enclosed to prevent the material from being blown away.

The BATTERY is somewhat like the hopper of a mill, in this is contained

the hot _liquor_, and is mostly constructed for eight men, _round_ which

they stand when _making_; the lower part is lead, the upper or working

part mahogany. All batteries are formed into divisions called PLANKS,

one of which is allotted to each man. There are many other little things

used by makers, but these three are all that deserve particular notice.

The first thing a maker looks for in the morning is the FUR, or raw

material, which is furnished to him by _weight_; the quantity being more

or less, according to the substance of the Hat required, and is in _two_

parcels, one of which contains the BEAVER, or napping; the other the

BODY (a proportionate scale of both will be seen hereafter). Thus

provided he takes it to the BOW GARRET; the materials for the body are

first placed on the hurdle, and the bow being hung at the centre for

support, is held in the left hand horizontally, so that the catgut may

come in contact with the fur; in the _right_ hand is placed a small

piece of stick, with a _nut_ at the end, and in this position the work

begins after the following manner. The _catgut_ of the bow (being first

placed in the midst of the _fur_) is pulled or struck with the knotted

stick, which produces, from a quick repetition of the stroke, a

continued _vibration_, this _vibration_ it is that causes a separation

or _flitting_ of the fur, at the same time mixing and cleansing it. This

operation is continued until such ends are fully attained. It is next

divided into _halves_, one of which is laid aside, and the other again

bowed over. In this second operation the workman contrives, partly by

bowing, and partly by a slight _wicker frame_, to bring the material

into an oblong form, and equal in size to a large sheet of cartridge

paper; this is called a BAT, and when done it is gently _pressed down_

by the _wicker_, after which a damp linen cloth is laid all over, and on

this again is placed a thick piece of dry HORSE HIDE; the workman now

begins to press hard on the hide for about five minutes; in the doing

this the fur adheres close to the damp cloth, into which it is _doubled

up_, and once more undergoes the pressure of the hand. Under this

operation (which is called BASONING) the _bat_ becomes _consolidated_,

and may be thrown, when taken out of the cloth, from one end of the

garret to the other without injury. The second half is next bowed,

formed into a _bat_, and _basoned_ as the first. This half _remains_ on

_the hurdle_, and a piece of _paper_, somewhat conical, is placed on it,

_over which_, and agreeable to the shape, the sides of the bat are

_doubled_. Here then is formed one half of the _body_, this is laid

aside, and the first bat is then put flat on the hurdle _on which_ the

one previously doubled is placed with its open part downwards; the lower

bat being transversely doubled over the top hat, forms a sort of

conical, or harlequin’s cap; in this state it is once more put into the

damp cloth, where it receives another hardening for the purpose of

uniting or _knitting_ both _bats_ together; after this it is folded into

the compass of _two hands_, ready for the _plank_. The next thing is the

_beaver_, or covering, which is bowed in _form_ to correspond with the

_body_, but has nothing to do with it in this stage.

Matters being completed thus far, this is called the _first process of

Hat-making_. The second commences as follows:—The workman having gone

from the bow garret to the making shop, takes his stand at the battery,

under which is a FIRE, for the purpose of heating the liquor;[1] into

this hot liquor the _body_ is quickly _immersed_, where it remains till

soaked through; it is afterwards laid on the _plank_ to _drain_ and

_cool_; this done, it is unfolded, gently rolled, turned at short

intervals in every direction, to prevent the sides uniting together; and

as the _liquor_ becomes _cold_ and rolled out, it is continually

supplied with _hot_ and fresh, by the sprinkling of a _brush_, which is

dipped in the _kettle_ for that purpose; under this operation, assisted

by the astringency of the _vitriol_, the body _shrinks_, and begins to

assume a tough _substance_. When it has shrunk to a _certain size_ (say

three-fifths, if to be _double_ covered), it is laid flat on the

_plank_, and the _first_ coat of _beaver_, as it comes from the _bow_,

is laid quite over it; the _brush_ is now dipped into the hot liquor,

the contents of which is sprinkled all over the _beaver_, directly

afterwards it is gently _patted down_ with the hot brush; here the body

is put into a _hair-cloth_, rolled in hot liquor, turned inside out,

rolled again until the _beaver_, is completely worked into the body;

when this is effected, it is in a fit state to receive the _second_

covering, which is put on as the first, the _working_, _turning_,

_patting_, and _rolling_ still continuing until it is reduced to a fit

dimension, the _beaver_ quite _clean_, and all together assuming a

closely _felted_, fine, solid piece of workmanship; after which it is

immediately _blocked_ in this same liquor, to the size wanted, and put

into a _stove_ to dry, from whence it is taken, and with a small fine

card the beaver is gently raised; without this, one half would lie

buried, and the beauty lost.—Here then is the complete PROCESS OF

HAT-MAKING.

Footnote 1:

The liquor, which is always kept up to _scalding_ heat, is nothing

more than clean soft water, with a wine glass of _vitriol_, and a

small quantity of beer dregs thrown in. The first is to _shrink_ the

body of the Hat in working; the other to destroy the _pernicious_

effect of the vitriol.

It is next sent to the DYER from whom it passes to the FINISHER, who,

after stiffening, blocking, and _half_ finishing, sends it to be picked,

which is performed by a woman, whose place it is to pull out the _kemps_

or thick hairs, without injuring the beaver,[2] although that is not

always accomplished. From the _picker_ it returns to the finisher who,

by the IRON and velvet cushion, gives it those highly brilliant and

admired beauties that an English Hat is so pre-eminently distinguished

for. The shaper next takes it in hand, who is guided in his operations

by the _fancy_ of the wearer, if bespoke, which is sometimes a little

_whimsical_. After shaping, it goes to the _trimmer_, from whom it is

returned to the TIPPER OFF; he gets it ready for wearing; it is then

sent to its destination, when the master, if he is _fortunate_, puts the

amount into his pocket.[3]

Footnote 2:

It has frequently been asked, why not make a Hat with _beaver only_,

the answer is, there is not sufficient _stamina_ or strength in it to

become a sound _felted_ substance. It would be worse than building a

_brick_ house without _mortar_ or some sort of cement, to bind the

whole together.

Footnote 3:

Some have payment _before_-hand, which brings out the following old,

but very foolish saying, “there are but _two_ bad paymasters, _he_ who

pays beforehand, and _he_ who _never_ pays.” How the latter can be a

_paymaster_ requires some little ingenuity to determine.

------------------------------------------------------------------------

Lloyd's Treatise on Hats, with Twenty-Four Engravings Containing Novel Delineations of His Various Shapes, Shewing the Manner in Which They Should Be Worn... · 第 32 / 45 题