And this:--

"The child is a poet, in fact, when he first plays at hide-and-seek,

or repeats the story of Jack the Giant-killer; the shepherd boy is a

poet when he first crowns his mistress with a garland of flowers; the

countryman when he stops to look at the rainbow; the city apprentice

when he gazes after the Lord Mayor's show; the miser when he hugs his

gold; the courtier who builds his hopes upon a smile; the savage who

paints his idol with blood; the slave who worships a tyrant, or the

tyrant who fancies himself a god; the vain, the ambitious, the proud,

the choleric man, the hero and the coward, the beggar and the king,

the rich and the poor, the young and the old, all live in a world of

their own making; and the poet does no more than describe what all

the others think and act."

"Poetry is not a branch of authorship; it is the stuff of which our

life is made."

The artist is speaking in Hazlitt, but beneath the full, rich exuberance

of the artist, you can detect an under-note of austerity.

Then again, his memorable utterance about the Dissenting minister from

one of his essays on "Court Influence."

"A Dissenting minister is a character not so easily to be dispensed

with, and whose place cannot be well supplied. It is a pity that

this character has worn itself out; that that pulse of thought and

feeling has ceased almost to beat in the heart of a nation, who, if

not remarkable for sincerity and plain downright well-meaning, are

remarkable for nothing. But we have known some such, in happier

days, who had been brought up and lived from youth to age in the one

constant belief in God and of His Christ, and who thought all other

things but dross compared with the glory hereafter to be revealed.

Their youthful hopes and vanity had been mortified in them, even in

their boyish days, by the neglect and supercilious regards of the

world; and they turned to look into their own minds for something

else to build their hopes and confidence upon. They were true

priests. They set up an image in their own minds--it was truth; they

worshipped an idol there--it was justice. They looked on man as

their brother, and only bowed the knee to the Highest. Separate from

the world, they walked humbly with their God, and lived in thought

with those who had borne testimony of a good conscience, with the

spirits of just men in all ages. . . . Their sympathy was not with

the oppressors, but the oppressed. They cherished in their

thoughts--and wished to transmit to their posterity--those rights and

privileges for asserting which their ancestors had bled on scaffolds,

or had pined in dungeons, or in foreign climes. Their creed, too,

was 'Glory to God, peace on earth, goodwill to man.' This creed,

since profaned and rendered vile, they kept fast through good report

and evil report. This belief they had, that looks at something out

of itself, fixed as the stars, deep as the firmament; that makes of

its own heart an altar to truth, a place of worship for what is

right, at which it does reverence with praise and prayer like a holy

thing, apart and content; that feels that the greatest Being in the

universe is always near it; and that all things work together for the

good of His creatures, under His guiding hand. This covenant they

kept, as the stars keep their courses; this principle they stuck by,

for want of knowing better, as it sticks by them to the last. It

grows with their growth, it does not wither in their decay. It lives

when the almond-tree flourishes, and is not bowed down with the

tottering knees. It glimmers with the last feeble eyesight, smiles

in the faded cheek like infancy, and lights a path before them to the

grave!"

Here is a man of Puritan lineage speaking; but is it the voice of

Puritanism only? Surely it is a Puritanism softened and refined, a

Puritanism which is free of those harsh and unpleasing elements that have

too often obscured its finer aspects. I know of no passage in his

writings which for spacious eloquence, nobleness of thought, beauty of

expression, can rival this. It was written in 1818, when Hazlitt was

forty years old, and in the plenitude of his powers.

The Vagabond in Literature · 第 16 / 72 题