[450] Rome suffered less, and survived, and dominated,--because

within her boundaries the rights of the individual had been more

respected.... Now the absence of individual freedom in modern Japan

would certainly appear to be nothing less than a national danger. For

those very habits of unquestioning obedience, and loyalty, and

respect for authority, which made feudal society possible, are likely

to render a true democratic regime impossible, and would tend to

bring about a state of anarchy. Only races long accustomed to

personal liberty,--liberty to think about matters of ethics apart

from matters of government,--liberty to consider questions of right

and wrong, justice and injustice, independently of political

authority,--are able to face without risk the peril now menacing

Japan. For should social disintegration take in Japan the same course

which it followed in the old European societies,--unchecked by any

precautionary legislation,--and so bring about another social

revolution, the consequence could scarcely be less than utter ruin.

In the antique world of Europe, the total disintegration of the

patriarchal system occupied centuries: it was slow, and it was

normal--not having been brought about by external forces. In Japan,

on the contrary, this disintegration is taking place under enormous

outside pressure, operating with the rapidity of electricity and

steam. In Greek societies the changes were effected in about three

[451] hundred years; in Japan it is hardly more than thirty years

since the patriarchal system was legally dissolved and the industrial

system reshaped; yet already the danger of anarchy is in sight, and

the population--astonishingly augmented by more than ten

millions--already begins to experience all the forms of misery

developed by want under industrial conditions.

It was perhaps inevitable that the greatest freedom accorded under

the new order of things should have been given in the direction of

greatest danger. Though the Government cannot be said to have done

much for any form of competition within the sphere of its own direct

control, it has done even more than could have been reasonably

expected on behalf of national industrial competition. Loans have

been lavishly advanced. subsidies generously allowed; and, in spite

of various panics and failures, the results have been prodigious.

Within thirty years the value of articles manufactured for export has

risen from half a million to five hundred million yen. But this

immense development has been effected at serious cost in other

directions. The old methods of family production--and therefore most

of the beautiful industries and arts, for which Japan has been so

long famed--now seem doomed beyond hope; and instead of the ancient

kindly relations between master and workers, there have been brought

into existence--with no legislation to restrain [452] inhumanity--all

the horrors of factory-life at its worst. The new combinations of

capital have actually reestablished servitude, under harsher forms

than ever were imagined under the feudal era; the misery of the women

and children subjected to that servitude is a public scandal, and

proves strange possibilities of cruelty on the part of a people once

renowned for kindness,--kindness even to animals.

There is now a humane outcry for reform; and earnest efforts have

been made, and will be made, to secure legislation for the protection

of operatives. But, as might be expected, these efforts have been

hitherto strongly opposed by manufacturing companies and syndicates

with the declaration that any Government interference with factory

management will greatly hamper, if not cripple, enterprise, and

hinder competition with foreign industry. Less than twenty years ago

the very same arguments were used in England to oppose the efforts

then being made to improve the condition of the industrial classes;

and that opposition was challenged by Professor Huxley in a noble

address, which every Japanese legislator would do well to read

to-day. Speaking of the reforms in progress during 1888. the

professor said:

"If it is said that the carrying out of such arrangements as those

indicated must enhance the cost of production, and thus handicap the

producer in the race of competition. I venture, in the first place.

to doubt the fact; but, if it be [453] so, it results that industrial

society has to face a dilemma, either alternative of which threatens

destruction.

"On the one hand, a population, the labour of which is sufficiently

remunerated, may be physically and morally healthy, and socially

stable, but may fail in industrial competition by reason of the

dearness of its produce. On the other hand, a population, the labour

of which is insufficiently remunerated, must become physically and

morally unhealthy, and socially unstable; and though it may succeed

for a while in competition, by reason of the cheapness of its

produce, it must in the end fall, through hideous misery and

degradation, to utter ruin.

"Well, if these be the only alternatives, let us for ourselves and

our children choose the former, and, if need be, starve like men. But

I do not believe that a stable society, made up of healthy, vigorous,

instructed, and self-ruling people would ever incur serious risk of

that fate. They are not likely to be troubled with many competitors

of the same character just yet; and they may be safely trusted to

find ways of holding their own."*

[*The Struggle for Existence in Human Society. "Collected Essays,"

Vol. IX. pp, 113--219.]

If the future of Japan could depend upon her army and her navy, upon

the high courage of her people and their readiness to die by the

hundred thousand for ideals of honour and of duty, there would be

small cause for alarm in the present state of affairs. Unfortunately

her future must depend upon other qualities than courage, other

abilities than those of [454] sacrifice; and her struggle hereafter

must be one in which her social traditions will place her at an

immense disadvantage. The capacity for industrial competition cannot

be made to depend upon the misery of women and children; it must

depend upon the intelligent freedom of the individual; and the

society which suppresses this freedom, or suffers it to be

suppressed, must remain too rigid for competition with societies in

which the liberties of the individual are strictly maintained. While

Japan continues to think and to act by groups, even by groups of

industrial companies, so long she must always continue incapable of

her best. Her ancient social experience is not sufficient to avail

her for the future international struggle,--rather it must sometimes

impede her as so much dead weight. Dead, in the ghostliest sense of

the word,--the viewless pressure upon her life of numberless vanished

generations. She will have not only to strive against colossal odds

in her rivalry with more plastic and more forceful societies; she

will have to strive much more against the power of her phantom past.

Yet it were a grievous error to imagine that she has nothing further

to gain from her ancestral faith. All her modern successes have been

aided by it; and all her modern failures have been marked by needless

breaking with its ethical custom. She could compel her people, by a

simple fiat, to adopt the [455] civilization of the West, with all

its pain and struggle, only because that people had been trained for

ages in submission and loyalty and sacrifice; and the time has not

yet come in which she can afford to cast away the whole of her moral

past. More freedom indeed she requires,--but freedom restrained by

wisdom; freedom to think and act and strive for self as well as for

others,--not freedom to oppress the weak, or to exploit the simple.

And the new cruelties of her industrial life can find no

justification in the traditions of her ancient faith, which exacted

absolute obedience from the dependant, but equally required the duty

of kindness from the master. In so far as she has permitted her

people to depart from the way of kindness, she herself has surely

departed from the Way of the Gods....

And the domestic future appears dark. Born of that darkness, an evil

dream comes oftentimes to those who love Japan: the fear that all her

efforts are being directed, with desperate heroism, only to prepare

the land for the sojourn of peoples older by centuries in commercial

experience; that her thousands of miles of railroads and telegraphs,

her mines and forges, her arsenals and factories, her docks and

fleets, are being put in order for the use of foreign capital; that

her admirable army and her heroic navy may be doomed to make their

last sacrifices in hopeless contest against some combination of

greedy states. provoked or encouraged to aggression [456] by

circumstances beyond the power of Government to control.... But the

statesmanship that has already guided Japan through many storms

should prove able to cope with this gathering peril.

[457]

REFLECTIONS

In the preceding pages I have endeavoured to suggest a general idea

of the social history of Japan, and a general idea of the nature of

those forces which shaped and tempered the character of her people.

Certainly this attempt leaves much to be desired: the time is yet far

away at which a satisfactory work upon the subject can be prepared.

But the fact that Japan can be understood only through the study of

her religious and social evolution has been, I trust, sufficiently

indicated. She affords us the amazing spectacle of an Eastern society

maintaining all the outward forms of Western civilization; using,

with unquestionable efficiency, the applied science of the Occident;

accomplishing, by prodigious effort, the work of centuries within the

time of three decades,--yet sociologically remaining at a stage

corresponding to that which, in ancient Europe, preceded the

Christian era by hundreds of years.

But no suggestion of origins and causes should diminish the pleasure

of contemplating this curious world, psychologically still so far

away from us in the course of human evolution. The wonder and [458]

the beauty of what remains of the Old Japan cannot be lessened by any

knowledge of the conditions that produced them. The old kindliness

and grace of manners need not cease to charm us because we know that

such manners were cultivated, for a thousand years, under the edge of

the sword. The common politeness which appeared, but a few years ago,

to be almost universal, and the rarity of quarrels, should not prove

less agreeable because we have learned that, for generations and

generations, all quarrels among the people were punished with

extraordinary rigour; and that the custom of the vendetta, which

rendered necessary such repression, also made everybody cautious of

word and deed. The popular smile should not seem less winning because

we have been told of a period, in the past of the subject-classes,

when not to smile in the teeth of pain might cost life itself. And

the Japanese woman, as cultivated by the old home-training, is not

less sweet a being because she represents the moral ideal of a

vanishing world, and because we can faintly surmise the cost,--the

incalculable cost in pain,--of producing her.

No: what remains of this elder civilization is full of charm,--charm

unspeakable,--and to witness its gradual destruction must be a grief

for whomsoever has felt that charm. However intolerable may seem, to

the mind of the artist or poet, those countless restrictions which

once ruled all this fairy-world [459] and shaped the soul of it, he

cannot but admire and love their best results: the simplicity of old

custom,--the amiability of manners,--the daintiness of habits,--the

delicate tact displayed in pleasure-giving,--the strange power of

presenting outwardly, under any circumstances, only the best and

brightest aspects of character. What emotional poetry, for even the

least believing, in the ancient home-religion,--in the lamplet

nightly kindled before the names of the dead, the tiny offerings of

food and drink, the welcome-fires lighted to guide the visiting

ghosts, the little ships prepared to bear--them back to their rest!

And this immemorial doctrine of filial piety,--exacting all that is

noble, not less than all that is terrible, in duty, in gratitude, in

self-denial,--what strange appeal does it make to our lingering

religious instincts; and how close to the divine appear to us the

finer natures forged by it! What queer weird attraction in those

parish-temple festivals, with their happy mingling of merriment and

devotion in the presence of the gods! What a universe of romance in

that Buddhist art which has left its impress upon almost every

product of industry, from the toy of a child to the heirloom of a

prince;--which has peopled the solitudes with statues, and chiselled

the wayside rocks with texts of sutras! Who can forget the soft

enchantment of this Buddhist atmosphere?--the deep music of the great

bells?--the [460] green peace of gardens haunted by fearless things,

doves that flutter down at call, fishes rising to be fed? ... Despite

our incapacity to enter into the soul-life of this ancient East,

--despite the certainty that one might as well hope to remount the

River of Time and share the vanished existence of some old Greek

city, as to share the thoughts and the emotions of Old Japan,--we

find ourselves bewitched forever by the vision, like those wanderers

of folk-tale who rashly visited Elf-land.

We know that there is illusion,--not as to the reality of the

visible, but as to its meanings,--very much illusion. Yet why should

this illusion attract us, like some glimpse of Paradise?--why should

we feel obliged to confess the ethical glamour of a civilization as

far away from us in thought as the Egypt of Ramses? Are we really

charmed by the results of a social discipline that refused to

recognize the individual?--enamoured of a cult that exacted the

suppression of personality?

No: the charm is made by the fact that this vision of the past

represents to us much more than past or present,--that it foreshadows

the possibilities of some higher future, in a world of Perfect

sympathy. After many a thousand years there may be developed a

humanity able to achieve, with never a shadow of illusion, those

ethical conditions prefigured by the ideals of Old Japan: instinctive

unselfishness, [461] a common desire to find the joy of life in

making happiness for others, a universal sense of moral beauty. And

whenever men shall have so far gained upon the present as to need no

other code than the teaching of their own hearts, then indeed the

ancient ideal of Shinto will find its supreme realization.

Moreover, it should be remembered that the social state, whose

results thus attract us, really produced much more than a beautiful

mirage. Simple characters of great charm, though necessarily of great

fixity, were developed by it in multitude. Old Japan came nearer to

the achievement of the highest moral ideal than our far more evolved

societies can hope to do for many a hundred years. And but for those

ten centuries of war which followed upon the rise of the military

power, the ethical end to which all social discipline tended might

have been much more closely approached. Yet if the better side of

this human nature had been further developed at the cost of darker

and sterner qualities, the consequence might have proved unfortunate

for the nation. No people so ruled by altruism as to lose its

capacities for aggression and cunning could hold their own, in the

present state of the world, against races hardened by the discipline

of competition as well as by the discipline of war. The future Japan

must rely upon the least [462] amiable qualities of her character for

success in the universal struggle; and she will need to develop them

strongly.

*

* *

How strongly she has been able to develop them in one direction, the

present war with Russia bears startling witness. But it is certainly

to the long discipline of the past that she owes the moral strength

behind this unexpected display of aggressive power. No superficial

observation could discern the silent energies masked by the

resignation of the people to change,--the unconscious heroism

informing this mass of forty million souls, the compressed force

ready to expand at Imperial bidding either for construction or

destruction. From the leaders of a nation with such a military and

political history, one might expect the manifestation of all those

abilities of supreme importance in diplomacy and war. But such

capacities could prove of little worth were it not for the character

of the masses,--the quality of the material that moves to command

with the power of winds and tides. The veritable strength of Japan

still lies in the moral nature of her common people,--her farmers and

fishers, artizans and labourers,--the patient quiet folk one sees

toiling in the rice-fields, or occupied with the humblest of crafts

and callings in city by-ways. All the unconscious heroism of the race

is in these, and all its splendid courage,--a [463] courage that does

not mean indifference to life, but the desire to sacrifice life at

the bidding of the Imperial Master who raises the rank of the dead.

From the thousands of young men now being summoned to the war, one

hears no expression of hope to return to their homes with glory;--the

common wish uttered is only to win remembrance at the Shokonsha--that

"Spirit-Invoking Temple," where the souls of all who die for Emperor

and fatherland are believed to gather. At no time was the ancient

faith stronger than in this hour of struggle; and Russian power will

have very much more to fear from that faith than from repeating

rifles or Whitehead torpedoes.* Shinto, as a religion of patriotism,

is a force that should suffice, if permitted fair-play, to affect not

only the destinies of the whole Far East, but the future of

civilization. No more irrational assertion was ever made about the

Japanese than the statement of their indifference to religion.

Religion is still, as it has [464] ever been, the very life of the

people,--the motive and the directing power of their every action: a

religion of doing and suffering, a religion without cant and

hypocrisy. And the qualities especially developed by it are just

those qualities which have startled Russia, and may yet cause her

many a painful surprise. She has discovered alarming force where she

imagined childish weakness; she has encountered heroism where she

expected to find timidity and helplessness.**

[*The following reply, made by Admiral Togo Commander-in-Chief of the

Japanese fleet, to an Imperial message of commendation received after

the second attempt to block the entrance to Port Arthur, is

characteristically Shinto:--

"The warm message which Your imperial Majesty condescended to grant

us with regard to the second attempt to seal Port Arthur, has not

only overwhelmed us with gratitude, but may also influence the

patriotic manes of the departed heroes to hover long over the

battle-field and give unseen protection to the Imperial forces."...

[Translated in the JAPAN TIMES of March 31st, 1904.]

--Such thoughts and hopes about the brave dead might have been

uttered by a Greek warrior before the battle of Salamis. The faith

and courage which helped the Greeks to repel the Persian invasion

were of precisely the same quality as that religious heroism which

now helps the Japanese to challenge the power of Russia.]

[**The case of the Japanese officers and men on the transport Kinshu

Maru, sank by the Russian warships on the 26th of last April, should

have given the enemy matter for reflection. Although allowed an

hour's time for consideration, the soldiers refused to surrender, and

opened fire with their rifles on the battleships. Then, before the

Kinshu Maru was blown in two by a torpedo, a number of the Japanese

officers and men performed harakiri.... This strong display of the

fierce old feudal spirit suggests how dearly a Russian success would

be bought.]

*

* *

For countless reasons this terrible war (of which no man can yet see

the end) is unspeakably to be regretted; and of these reasons not the

least are industrial. War must temporarily check all tendencies

towards the development of that healthy individualism without which

no modern nation can become prosperous and wealthy. Enterprise is

numbed, markets paralyzed, manufactures stopped. Yet, in the

extraordinary case of this extraordinary people, it is possible that

the social effects of the contest will prove to some degree

beneficial. Prior to hostilities, there had been a visible tendency

to [465] the premature dissolution of institutions founded upon

centuries of experience,--a serious likelihood of moral

disintegration. That great changes must hereafter be made,--that the

future well-being of the country requires them,--would seem to admit

of no argument. But it is necessary that such changes be effected by

degrees,--not with such inopportune haste as to imperil the moral

constitution of the nation. A war for independence,--a war that

obliges the race to stake its all upon the issue,--must bring about a

tightening of the old social bonds, a strong quickening of the

ancient sentiments of loyalty and duty, a reinforcement of

conservatism. This will signify retrogression in some directions; but

it will also mean invigoration in others. Before the Russian menace,

the Soul of Yamato revives again. Out of the contest Japan will come,

if successful, morally stronger than before; and a new sense of

self-confidence, a new spirit of independence, might then reveal

itself in the national attitude toward foreign policy and foreign

pressure.

--There would be, of course, the danger of overconfidence. A people

able to defeat Russian power on land and sea might be tempted to

believe themselves equally able to cope with foreign capital upon

their own territory; and every means would certainly be tried of

persuading or bullying the government [466] into some fatal

compromise on the question of the right of foreigners to hold land.

Efforts in this direction have been carried on persistently and

systematically for years; and these efforts seem to have received

some support from a class of Japanese politicians, apparently

incapable of understanding what enormous tyranny a single privileged

syndicate of foreign capital would be capable of exercising in such a

country. It appears to me that any person comprehending, even in the

vaguest way, the nature of money-power and the average conditions of

life throughout Japan, must recognize the certainty that foreign

capital, with right of land-tenure, would find means to control

legislation, to control government, and to bring about a state of

affairs that would result in the practical domination of the empire

by alien interests. I cannot resist the conviction that when Japan

yields to foreign industry the right to purchase land, she is lost

beyond hope. The self-confidence that might tempt to such yielding,

in view of immediate advantages, would be fatal. Japan has

incomparably more to fear from English or American capital than from

Russian battleships and bayonets. Behind her military capacity is the

disciplined experience of a thousand years; behind her industrial and

commercial power, the experience of half-a-century. But she has been

fully warned; and if she chooses hereafter to invite her own ruin, it

will not have [467] been for lack of counsel,--since she had the

wisest man in the world to advise her.* [*Herbert Spencer.]

Japan: An Attempt at Interpretation · 第 26 / 29 段