The clerical party replied with a good argument:—

_The Lord I adore_

_Is mighty in power_,

_The one only living and true_;

_But that Lord of yours_

_Which was turned out of doors_,

_Had just as much knowledge as you_.

_But since you bemoan_

_This God of your own_,

_Cheer up my disconsolate brother_:

_Though it seems very odd_,

_Yet if this be your God_

_Mr. Burley _{51}_ can make you another_.

At the suppression of monasteries in the time of Henry VIII, the entire

eastern portion, which constituted two-thirds of the structure, was

destroyed. There are remains, however, sufficient to indicate its

massiveness and majesty. The most prominent of these is the broad

western tower which presents a stately, dignified appearance. There are

also the nave and the side aisles; and these with the tower form the

present church, which, though with evidences of mutilation, has a

venerable aspect, and is characterised by “a noble simplicity combined

with a massive solidity.” The three windows are all at present of the

Perpendicular style; but there are prints of older date which show the

two smaller to have been of a different character. The portal is a

deeply recessed semicircular arch, terminating in a pointed doorway. The

bellchamber has two windows on each side; between those of the western

front, in a canopied niche, is the statue of an armed knight, having a

conical basinet encircled by a crown. This figure is with good reason

supposed to represent Edward III. in whose reign the tower was probably

begun. The south doorway is plain Norman in character, resting on

slender shafts, and adjoining is the ruined wall of the transept. The

choir having been destroyed the eastern end now terminates in a wall run

up between the remains of the two western piers, which supported the

central tower. Of course, in the interior the altar stands here, above

which are placed Norman windows, containing six figures in stained glass

of kings and apostles. They are deep and brilliant in colour, and the

drawing is good. Below is a reredos, forming a series of five Norman

arches.

The interior of the Abbey is a fine specimen of solid Norman work. The

whole is in the massive Norman style except what is beyond the three

semicircular arches westward, where there is a very wide pier, on the

eastern and western extremities of which are half columns of the arcades,

and in the middle is attached a flat pilaster. From hence the nave

displays the commencement of a different style, and the Norman gives

place to pure Gothic of the fourteenth century. This terminates in a

beautiful pointed arch, which divides the tower from the nave, and by the

removal of the organ gallery and screen the whole extent of the great

western window is now displayed, which certainly imparts a very striking

appearance to that portion of the building. The entire window is filled

with a series of armorial bearings of some of England’s ancient peerage,

as well as a few very modern. It is, in fact, a perfect study of

heraldry. There are several monuments of interest, but the most singular

is one which stands on the north side of the altar, which at the first

view presents the appearance of two tombs, but on examination proves to

be only one, the double appearance being given by a centre buttress,

which is not carried over the ledge, upon which rest two figures, the

head of the one at the feet of the other. They are supposed to represent

the “same” individual who had abandoned the military for the eremitical

life, but there is not the slightest clue to his name.

The walls of the nave, with the pillars and arches, were, in 1855,

cleared of their plaster covering; but such a state of dilapidation was

developed as to necessitate a thorough restoration, which has been

carefully and effectually carried out. It may be proper to mention that

on the fall of St. Chad’s, and the demolition of St. Alkmund’s, the walls

of which “were in such a sound state as to require a very great amount of

labour to remove them,” several ancient monuments found a place within

the walls of the Abbey.

Of the monastic remains there are only “few and far between.” On the

south-west of the church is a malthouse which is supposed to have been

part of the monks’ infirmary and chapel. A similar building which stood

near the street, and a dormitory attached to the south-west side of the

church were taken down in 1836 for the formation of a new line of road.

The most striking of the remains is the elegant octagonal STONE PULPIT,

in a yard on the right. It is thought to have stood within the

refectory, and to have been used as the lectern by the junior monks to

read from while the elder brethren were enjoying meals in the

dining-room. The interior forms an oriel, the roof being vaulted on

eight delicate ribs.

From hence we take the road upwards, and call to mind in our walk two

notable but not pleasant incidents. The first goes as far back as 1582,

in which year, on February 4th, one John Prestige “was hanged upon a

gibbet, erected on the green, by the water side, near the Abbey Mill, and

opposite his own house, for the murder of his wife, by throwing her over

the Stone (the English) Bridge in the Severn: he hung there three days.”

The second brings us down to 1774 when, on Good Friday, April 1st, a

disastrous fire broke out in the Abbey Foregate by which forty-seven

houses, sixteen barns, fifteen stables, four shops, and several stacks of

hay were utterly destroyed. This serious conflagration led to the

purchase by the Worshipful Company of Drapers of a fire engine, a

quantity of buckets and fire hooks, and to the erection of fire plugs for

the use of the town. These disagreeable memories are relieved by the

sight of

Historical and Descriptive Guide Through Shrewsbury · 第 52 / 62 题