CHAPTER XIX

I've had much leisure to be thinking of late. A man has time to wonder

and to speculate concerning life and what he's seen o' it when he's

taking a long ocean voyage. And I've been meditating on some curious

contrasts. I was in Australia when I heard of the coming of the war.

My boy John was with me, then; he'd come there tae meet his mither and

me. He went hame, straight hame; I went to San Francisco.

Noo I'm on ma way hame frae Australia again, and again I've made the

lang journey by way of San Francisco and the States. And there's a

muckle to think upon in what I've seen. Sad sichts they were, a many

of them. In yon time when I was there before the world was a' at

peace. Men went aboot their business, you in Australia, underneath the

world, wi' no thought of trouble brewing. But other men, in Europe,

thousands of miles way, were laying plans that meant death and the

loss of hands and een for those braw laddies o' Australia and New

Zealand that I saw--those we came to ken sae weel as the gallant

Anzacs.

It makes you realize, seeing countries so far awa' frae a' the war,

and yet suffering so there from, how dependent we all are upon one

another. Distance makes no matter; differences make none. We cannot

escape the consequences of what others do. And so, can we no be

thinking sometimes, before we act, doing something that we think

concerns only ourselves, of all those who micht suffer for what we

did?

I maun think of labor when I think of the Anzacs. Yon is a country

different frae any I have known. There's no landed aristocracy in the

land of the Anzac. Yon's a country where all set out on even terms.

That's truer there, by far, than in America, even. It's a young

country and a new country, still, but it's grown up fast. It has the

strength and the cities of an old country, but it has a freshness of

its own.

And there labor rules the roost. It's one of the few places in the

world where a government of labor has been instituted. And yet, I'm

wondering the noo if those labor leaders in Australia have reckoned on

one or twa things I think of? They're a' for the richts of labor--and

so am I. I'd be a fine one, with the memory I have of unfairness and

exploitation of the miners in the coal pits at Hamilton, did I not

agree that the laboring man must be bound together with his fellows to

gain justice and fair treatment from his employers.

But there's a richt way and a wrong way to do all things. And there

was a wrong way that labor used, sometimes, during the war, to gain

its ends. There was sympathy for all that British labor did among

laboring men everywhere, I'm told--in Australia, too. But let's bide a

wee and see if labor didn't maybe, mak' some mistakes that it may be

threatening to mak' again noo that peace has come.

Here's what I'm afraid of. Labor used threats in the war. If the

government did not do thus and so there'd be a strike. That was

meanin' that guns would be lacking, or shell, or rifles, or hand

grenades, or what not in the way of munitions, on the Western front.

But the threat was sae vital that it won, tae often I'm no saying it

was used every time. Nor am I saying labor did not have a richt to

what it asked. It's just this--canna we get alang without making

threats, one to the other?

And there were some strikes that had serious consequences. There were

strikes that delayed the building of ships, and the making of cannon

and shell. And as a result of them men died, in France, and in

Gallipoli, and in other places, who need no have died. They were

laddies who'd dropped all, who'd gi'en up all that was dear to them,

all comfort and safety, when the country called.

They had nae voice in the matters that were in dispute. None thought,

when sic a strike was called, of hoo those laddies in the trenches wad

be affected. That's what I canna forgie. That's what makes me wonder

why the Anzacs, when they reach home, don't have a word to say

themselves aboot the troubles that the union leaders would seem to be

gaein' to bring aboot.

We're in a ficht still, even though peace has come. We're in a ficht

wi' poverty, and disease, and all the other menaces that still

threaten our civilization. We'll beat them, as we ha' beaten the other

enemies. But we'll no beat them by quarrelling amang oorselves, any

more than we'd ever have beaten the Hun if France and Britain had

stopped the war, every sae often, to hae oot an argument o' their own.

We had differences with our gude friends the French, fraw time to

time. Sae did the Americans, and whiles we British and our American

cousins got upon ane anither's nerves. But there was never real

trouble or difficulty, as the result and the winning of the war have

shown.

Do you ken what it is we've a' got to think of the noo? It's

production. We must produce more than we ha' ever done before. It's no

a steady raise in wages that will help. Every time wages gang up a

shilling or twa, everything else is raised in proportion. The

workingman maun mak' more money; everyone understands that. But the

only way he can safely get more siller is to earn more--to increase

production as fast as he knows how.

It's the only way oot--and it's true o' both Britain and America. The

more we mak' the more we'll sell. There's a market the noo for all we

English speaking folk can produce. Germany is barred, for a while at

least; France, using her best efforts and brains to get back upon her

puir, bruised feet, canna gae in avily for manufactures for a while

yet. We, in Britain, have only just begun to realize that the war is

over. It took us a long time to understand what we were up against at

the beginning, and what sort of an effort we maun mak' if we were to

win the war.

And then, before we'd done, we were doing things we'd never ha dreamed

it was possible for us tae do before the need was upon us. We in

Britain had to do without things we'd regarded as necessities and we

throve without them. For the sake of the wee bairns we went without

milk for our tea and coffee, and scarce minded it. Aye, in a thousand

little ways that had not seemed to us to matter at all we were

deprived and harried and hounded.

Noo, what I'm thinking sae often is just this. We had a great problem

to meet in the winning of the war. We solved it, though it was greater

than any of those we were wont to call insoluble. Are there no

problems left? There's the slum. There's the sort of poverty that

afflicts a man who's willing tae work and can nicht find work enough

tae do tae keep himself and his family alive and clad. There's all

sorts of preventible disease. We used to shrug our shoulders and speak

of such things as the act of God. But I'll no believe they're acts of

God. He doesna do things in such a fashion. They're acts of man, and

it's for man to mak' them richt and end what's wrong wi' the world he

dwells in.

They used to shrug their shoulders in Russia, did those who had enough

to eat and a warm, decent hoose tae live in. They'd hear of the

sufferings of the puir, and they'd talk of the act of God, and how

he'd ordered it that i' this world there maun always be some

suffering.

And see what's come o' that there! The wrong sort of man has set to

work to mak' a wrong thing richt, and he's made it worse than it ever

was. But how was it he had the chance to sway the puir ignorant bodies

in Russia? How was it that those who kenned a better way were not at

work long agane? Ha' they anyone but themselves to blame that Trotzky

and the others had the chance to persuade the Russian people tae let

them ha' power for a little while'?

Oh, we'll no come to anything like that in Britain and America. I've

sma' patience wi' those that talk as if the Bolsheviki would be ruling

us come the morrow. We're no that sort o' folk, we Britons and

Americans. We've settled our troubles our ain way these twa thousand

years, and we'll e'en do sae again. But we maun recognize that there

are things we maun do tae mak' the lot of the man that's underneath a

happier and a better one.

He maun help, tae. He maun realize that there's a chance for him. I'm

haulding mysel' as one proof of that--it's why I've told you sae

muckle in this book of myself and the way that I've come frae the pit

tae the success and the comfort that I ken the noo.

I had to learn, lang agane, that my business was not only mine. Maybe

you'll think that I'm less concerned with others and their affairs

than maist folk, and maybe that's true, tae. But I. canna forget

others, gi'en I would. When I'm singing I maun have a theatre i' which

to appear. And I canna fill that always by mysel'. I maun gae frae

place to place, and in the weeks of the year when I'm no appearing

there maun be others, else the theatre will no mak' siller enough for

its owners to keep it open.

And then, let's gie a thought to just the matter of my performance.

There must be an orchestra. It maun play wi' me; it maun be able to

accompany me. An orchestra, if it is no richt, can mak' my best song

sound foolish and like the singing o' some one who dinna ken ane note

of music frae the next. So I'm dependent on the musicians--and they on

me. And then there maun be stage hands, to set the scenes. Folk

wouldna like it if I sang in a theatre wi'oot scenery. There maun be

those that sell tickets, and tak' them at the doors, and ushers to

show the folk their seats.

And e'en before a'body comes tae the hoose to pay his siller for a

ticket there's others I'm dependent upon. How do they ken I'm in the

toon at a'? They've read it in the papers, maybe--and there's

reporters and printers I've tae thank. Or they've seen my name and my

picture on a hoarding, and I've to think o' the men who made the

lithograph sheets, and the billposters who put them up. Sae here's

Harry Lauder and a' the folk he maun have tae help him mak' a living

and earn his bit siller! More than you'd thought' Aye, and more than

I'd thought, sometimes.

There's a michty few folk i' this world who can say they're no

dependant upon others in some measure. I ken o' none, myself. It's a

fine thing to mind one's ain business, but if one gies the matter

thought one will find, I think, that a man's business spreads oot more

than maist folk reckon it does.

Here, again. In the States there's been trouble about the men that

work on the railways. Can I say it's no my business? Is it no? Suppose

they gae oot on strike? How am I to mak' my trips frae one toon the

the next? And should I no be finding oot, if there's like that

threatening to my business, where the richt lies? You will be finding

it's sae, too, in your affairs; there's little can come that willna

affect you, soon or late.

We maun all stand together, especially we plain men and women. It was

sae that we won the war--and it is sae that we can win the peace noo

that it's come again, and mak' it a peace sae gude for a' the world

that it can never be broken again by war. There'd be no wars i' the

world if peace were sae gude that all men were content. It's

discontented men who stir up trouble in the world, and sae mak' wars

possible.

We talk much, in these days, of classes. There's a phrase it sickens

me tae hear--class consciousness. It's ane way of setting the man who

works wi' his hands against him who works wi' his brain. It's no the

way a man works that ought to count--it's that he works at all. Both

sorts of work are needful; we canna get along without either sort.

Is no humanity a greater thing than any class? We are all human. We

maun all be born, and we maun all die in the end. That much we ken,

and there's nae sae much more we can be siccar of. And I've often

thought that the trouble with most of our hatreds an' our envy and

malice is that folk do not know one another well enough. There's fewer

quarrels among folk that speak the same tongue. Britain and America

dwelt at peace for mair than a hundred years before they took the

field together against a common enemy. America and Canada stand side

by side--a great strong nation and a small one. There's no fort

between them; there are no fichting ships on the great lakes, ready to

loose death and destruction.

It's easier to have a good understanding when different peoples speak

the same language. But there's a hint o' the way things must be done,

I'm thinking, in the future. Britain and France used tae have their

quarrels. They spoke different tongues. But gradually they built up a

gude understanding of one another, and where's the man in either

country the noo that wadna laugh at you if you said there was danger

they micht gae tae war?

It's harder, it may be, to promote a gude understanding when there's a

different language for a barrier. But walls can be climbed, and

there's more than the ane way of passing them. We've had a great

lesson in that respect in the war. It's the first time that ever a

coalition of nations held together. Germany and Austria spoke one

language. But we others, with a dozen tongues or mair to separate us,

were forged into one mighty confederation by our peril and our

consciousness of richt, and we beat doon that barrier of various

languages, sae that it had nae existence.

And it's not only foreign peoples that speak a different tongue at

times. Whiles you'll find folk of the same family, the same race, the

same country, who gie the same words different meanings, and grow

confused and angry for that reason. There's a way they can overcome

that, and reach an understanding. It's by getting together and talking

oot all that confuses and angers them. Speech is a great solvent if a

man's disposed any way at all to be reasonable, and I've found, as

I've gone about the world, that most men want to be reasonable.

They'll call me an optimist, maybe. I'll no be ashamed of that title.

There was a saying I've heard in America that taught me a lot. They've

a wee cake there they call a doughnut--awfu' gude eating, though no

quite sae gude as Mrs. Lauder's scones. There's round hole in the

middle of a doughnut, always. And the Americans have a way of saying:

"The optimist sees the doughnut; the pessimist sees the hole." It's a

wise crack, you, and it tells you a good deal, if you'll apply it.

There's another way we maun be thinking. We've spent a deal of blood

and siller in these last years. We maun e'en have something to show

for all we've spent. For a muckle o' the siller we've spent we've just

borrowed and left for our bairns and their bairns to pay when the time

comes. And we maun leave the world better for those that are coming,

or they'll be saying it's but a puir bargain we've made for them, and

what we bought wasna worth the price.

Between You and Me · 第 19 / 28 章