SOME STARTLING FIGURES.

New York, during the year 1899, paid from the public treasury for items

wholly due to crime the sum of $12,988,804. Then he mentioned many

other expenditures which were partly chargeable to crime aggregating

$7,889,259, making a total of $20,778,083. In comparing these figures

with the population of New York, Mr. Smith concluded that crime in the

American metropolis cost the people about $6 per capita annually. In

San Francisco it ran about $5 per capita, and in other cities mentioned

from $3 to $3.50 per capita. The excess in New York and San Francisco,

was partly explained from the fact, that the figures quoted included

county taxation.

The speaker then gave comprehensive statements, from which he gathered

conclusions as to the cost of crime in the rural districts, adding

that a very conservative estimate would be $1.00 per capita per year.

Estimating that the present population of the country was 75,000,000

and that 40 per cent. lived in cities of above 8,000 inhabitants,

he placed the total cost of crime at $150,000,000 per year. To this

he added $50,000,000 from federal and State taxes, making the total

$200,000,000 per year.

These figures, said Mr. Smith, inaccurate as they may seem to be,

prove that crime is by far the largest factor with which political

economy has to deal. The only other item of expense that comes near to

it is the maintainance of the public schools, which for the same year

aggregate about $139,000,000. But the enormous expenditure mentioned is

only for the prevention of crime.

The city of New York expends each year an enormous sum for maintaining

its fire department, but that is not the only expense caused through

the existence of fires. No possible statistics can be compiled to give

an estimate for the cost of property stolen and the suffering caused by

crime.

These facts are real, not estimated.

The Journal of Prison Discipline and Philanthropy (New Series, No. 40, January 1901) · 第 111 / 139 题