GRADING AND CLASSIFYING OF PRISONERS.

_From the Report of the Board of Control, Iowa._

This is carefully done in all our reformatories, but in the State

penitentiaries and penal institutions very rarely. It seems fitting

now, that the public desire is not only to hold the convict, but to

encourage self help, by a system of regular graded or progressive

classifications of prisoners, based on character, and operated on a

system of marks. Hope should be made an ever present force in the minds

of the prisoner, by a system of rewards for good conduct, that carries

with it a promotion from a lower to a higher grade.

In connection with this system of classification, a well regulated

parole and indeterminate sentence law will be enacted by the

Legislature; thereby placing the destiny of the prisoner in his own

hands, and by his own exertions to continually better his condition.

The object of imprisonment and prison government is for the protection

of society and for the reformation of the prisoner. It is plain the

State does not discharge its obligation until one or both these objects

have been clearly accomplished. If the prisoner cannot be reformed,

he must be held indefinitely, yet the parole system in connection

with established grades may be so administered as to secure these

results. It is better than a definite sentence (that does not reform)

without a provision of parole; but more effective when coupled with

the reformatory or indeterminate sentence, because it makes a stronger

appeal to the convict for his co-operation.

It is gratifying to know that this is to be introduced into all the

State penal institutions of Iowa.

The Journal of Prison Discipline and Philanthropy (New Series, No. 40, January 1901) · 第 51 / 139 题