42. SIN

Sin is a great fact. It can not be denied. It can not be explained by

evolution. It is universal. Every race all nations, with all grades of

intellect and culture, civilized or uncivilized, are cursed with

sin. All the wrongs, all crimes in the world, all immoralities, are

due to sin. Sin causes tremendous destruction of life, property, and

character. Why is it universal? When did it originate? Did it

originate in all the members of the brute-human race at one time? Did

some become sinners, and others remain without sin? Sin must be

developed, since brutes have no sin. Why not some of the ape-humans

without sin? Does natural selection explain the universal sinfulness

of man, on the ground that those who did not have this "improvement"

perished? They all died and only sinners were left, hence all

survivors are sinners! Sin makes men more fit, and hence sinners only

survive! Is evolution simply ridiculous, or a crime?

When in the "ascent of man" did he become a sinner? A million years

ago? Judging from the pictures of fierce alleged ape-men, it must have

been a long, long time ago. Did all become sinners then? What became

of the progeny of those who had not secured the attainment of sin? Why

have not other members of the monkey family become sinners? Why do we

not hang them for murder? Will they yet attain unto sinfulness?

H. G. Wells, the alleged historian, says, p. 954, Outline of Hist.,

"If all the animals and man had been evolved in this ascendant manner,

then there had been no first parents, no Eden and no Fall. And, if

there had been no Fall, then the entire historical fabric of

Christianity, the story of the first sin, and the reason for an

atonement upon which the current teaching based Christian emotion and

morality, collapses like a house of cards."

Evolution claims that man fell up and not down. It denies almost every

truth of religion and the Bible, as well as of experience. "Man is

falling upward, he is his own Savior, he is ever progressing, and has

no need of a Savior." Contrast this with the sublime statements of the

word of God concerning the creation and the fall of man.

Evolution is charged with explaining all phenomena pertaining to

man,--soul and body. It exhausts itself in trying to show that the

body of man may _possibly_ be developed from the brute. It fails

miserably. The problem of accounting for the soul of man with all its

equipment is so much more difficult, that little or no effort is made

to account for it, virtually confessing that the much-exploited theory

of evolution can not possibly be true, when applied to the soul as

well as the body.

The Evolution of Man Scientifically Disproved in 50 Arguments · 第 62 / 80 题