38. ABSTRACT REASON

When did reason begin? Do we find it in any species of plant or animal

life, save man? The highest order of animals can not reason enough to

start a fire or replenish one. A dog, or a cat, or even a monkey, will

enjoy the warmth from a fire but will not replenish it, although they

may have seen it done many times. Animals may be taught many

interesting tricks; many can imitate well. But they do not have the

power of reflection or abstract reason. They live for the

present. They have no plans for tomorrow,---no purpose in life. They

can not come to new conclusions. They can not add or subtract,

multiply or divide. They can not even count. Some animals can solve

very intricate problems by instinct, but instinct is the intelligence

of God, and never could have come by evolution.

If reason came not from God, but from evolution, should we not expect

it well developed in evolutionary man, since for the last 3,000,000

years he must have been 95 to 100 per cent, normal. If we grant the

estimate of 500,000,000 years, he would have been 99.4% normal for the

last 3,000,000 years. Would we not expect in that time a world of

inventions and discoveries, even surpassing those of the last 100

years? The Chinese claim a multitude of inventions and a race so

nearly normal as ape-men, ought to have invented language, writing,

printing, the telegraph, phonograph, the wireless, the radio,

television, and even greater wonders than in our age.

There is no trace of intelligence in man in all the 3,000,000 years,

prior to Adam.

We should have many works excelling Homer's Iliad, Vergil's Aeneid,

and Milton's Paradise Lost. We have no trace of a road, or a bridge,

or a monument, like the pyramids. That no race of intelligent

creatures ever lived prior to Adam is proven by lack of affirmative

evidence. If it be true, as Romanes declared, that the power of

abstract reason in all the species was only equal to that of a child

15 months old, then each species would possess less than one millionth

of that.

The Evolution of Man Scientifically Disproved in 50 Arguments · 第 58 / 80 题