THE EVOLUTION OF THE HUMAN BODY MATHEMATICALLY DISPROVED

Any scientific theory or hypothesis must be proved first possible,

then probable, then certain. To be a possible theory, it must be

reconcilable with many facts; to be a probable theory, it must be

reconcilable with many more; to be a certain and proven theory, it

must be reconcilable with _all_ the facts. Whenever it is

irreconcilable with _any_ fact, it should be rejected, as it can

not be a true theory. Every true theory passes through these three

stages,--possibility, probability, and certainty. A theory is not

science, until it is certainly true, and so becomes knowledge. The

evolution of man from the brute is in the throes of a desperate

struggle to show that it may possibly be a true theory or

hypothesis. Yet some who are ready to admit that they are

"scientists," claim evolution a proven theory.

If it can be shown possible for man to have descended or ascended from

the lower animals, it will require enormous additional evidence to

show that such descent is probable; and still much more to make it

certain.

Every scientific theory, proposed as _possible_, is reconcilable

with some facts. Otherwise, it would not have been considered for a

moment. Many false hypotheses have been proposed, and accepted as

possible and even probable, because reconcilable with some facts. The

Ptolemaic theory of the universe, making the earth the centre, around

which the heavens revolved in great concentric spheres, was accepted

for 1400 years from A. D. 140, because it explained many things. It

corresponded with appearances. It appealed to all. Its advocates had

great difficulty in reconciling it with the motions of the planets,

which were therefore called planets or "wanderers." But in time the

Copernican theory prevailed, because it was reconcilable with all the

facts. The evidence is so abundant that all claim it the true

theory. It is science. It is knowledge.

Because the Copernican hypothesis, the true theory of the universe,

was opposed and rejected, it does not follow that the evolution of man

is true because it is likewise opposed and rejected. If this new

theory, hypothesis, or guess stands, it can only do so, because it

harmonizes with all the facts. The law of gravitation, and every other

proven theory harmonizes with all the facts and with all other true

theories.

It will be shown in this book, that a large number of facts can not be

reconciled with evolution, especially the evolution of man, thus

proving that it can not be a true theory. We really have a right to

demand the proof of a theory, and to refuse consent until

proved. While we are under no obligation to _disprove_ an

unproven theory, yet it is the shortest way to settle the matter once

for all, before it has led multitudes more astray, and wrecked the

faith and hopes of the young.

Prof. H. H. Newman, in his "Readings in Evolution," p. 57, says,

"Reluctant as we may be to admit it, honesty compels the evolutionist

to admit that there is no absolute proof of organic evolution." "If

all the facts are in accord with it, and none are found that are

incapable of being reconciled with it, a working hypothesis is said to

have been advanced to a proven theory." Note this admission by a

leading evolutionist.

Even if it should ever be proved that all plant and animal life came

by evolution from one primordial germ, it would not follow that either

the body or the soul of man came by evolution. All the arguments

against evolution in general are valid against the evolution of man.

In addition, there are many other arguments, that prove the evolution

of man impossible, even if the evolution of plants and animals should

ever be proved possible.

In this volume, the claim is made that the evolution of man is

irreconcilable with a large number of facts. If investigation proves

that we have erred in any statement of facts, or if our reasoning in

any one argument or more is fallacious, we will not lose our case, as

long as evolution remains irreconcilable with any other single

fact. If every argument in this book were invalid, save one, that one

valid argument would overthrow evolution, since every true theory must

be reconcilable with all the facts. One irreconcilable fact is

sufficient to overthrow evolution. And there are many!

The Evolution of Man Scientifically Disproved in 50 Arguments · 第 11 / 80 题