CHAPTER II

IN SEARCH OF A LOST CIVILIZATION

When we first met in Jerusalem, and later on in the solitude of

the desert, I was unable to draw Lawrence out about his early life.

So, after the termination of the war, on my way back to America,

I visited England in the hope of being able to learn something

concerning his career prior to 1914, which might throw a light on

the formative period when Destiny was preparing him for his

important rôle. The war had so scattered his family and early

associates that I found it difficult to obtain aught but the most

meager information about his boyhood.

County Galway, on the west coast of Ireland, was the original home

of the Lawrences. This may partly account for his unusual powers

of physical endurance, for the inhabitants of Galway are among the

hardiest of a hardy race. But in his veins there also flows Scotch,

Welsh, English, and Spanish blood. Among his celebrated ancestors

was Sir Robert Lawrence, who accompanied Richard the Lion-Hearted

to the Holy Land, seven hundred and thirty years ago, and

distinguished himself at the siege of Acre, just as the youthful

T. E. Lawrence accompanied Allenby to the Holy Land and distinguished

himself in its final deliverance. The brothers, Sir Henry and Sir

John Lawrence of Mutiny fame, pioneers of Britain’s empire in

India, were among his more recent predecessors.

His father, Thomas Lawrence, was at one time the owner of estates

in Ireland and a great sportsman. Losing most of his worldly

possessions during the Gladstone period, when the bottom fell out

of land values in Ireland, he brought his family across the Irish

Sea to Wales, and Thomas Edward Lawrence was born in Carnarvon

County, not far from the early home of Mr. Lloyd George, who is

to-day one of his warmest friends and admirers, and who once told

me that he, too, regards Lawrence as one of the most picturesque

figures of modern times.

Five years of his boyhood were spent on the Channel Isle of Jersey.

When he was ten years of age his family migrated to the north of

Scotland, remaining there for three years. They next moved to

France, where young Lawrence attended a Jesuit College, although

all the members of the family belong to the orthodox Church of

England. From the Continent they went to Oxford; and that center

of English culture, which has been their home ever since, has left

its indelible mark on Lawrence. There Ned, as his boyhood companions

called him, attended Oxford High School and studied under a tutor

preparatory to entering the university. One of his school chums

relates that although not a star athlete he had a daring spirit

and was filled with the love of adventure.

“Underneath Oxford,” this companion tells us, “runs a subterranean

stream bricked over, the Trill Mill Stream. Ned Lawrence and

another boy, carrying lights and often lying flat to scrape through

the narrow culverts, navigated the whole of that underground water

passage.

“Oxford is a great boating center. Every stream that joins the

Thames is explored as far up as any slender craft will float. But

the River Cherwell above Islip is said by the guide-books to be

‘nowhere navigable.’ To say that is to challenge boys like Ned

Lawrence to prove the statement untrue, and that is what he and a

companion did. They trained their canoe to Banbury and came right

down the part of the stream that was ‘nowhere navigable.’”

He was fond of climbing trees and scrambling over the roofs of

buildings where none dared to follow. “It was on such an occasion,”

one of his brothers informed me, “that he fell and broke a leg.”

His relatives attribute his smallness of stature to that accident.

He seems never to have grown since.

All his life he has been as irregular in his ways as the wild

tribesmen of the Arabian Desert. Although he completed the required

four years’ work for his bachelor’s degree in three years, he never

attended a single lecture at Oxford, so far as I have been able to

discover. He occasionally worked with tutors, but he spent most of

his time wandering about England on foot, or reading medieval

literature. In order to be alone he frequently slept by day and

then read all night. He was entirely opposed to any set system of

education. The aged professor who angrily admonished Samuel Johnson

when a student at Oxford, “Young man, ply your book diligently now,

and acquire a stock of knowledge,” would have been equally

displeased with young Lawrence. The idea of obtaining a university

education in order to take up a conventional occupation did not

please him at all. His unconscious credo from earliest youth, like

Robert Louis Stevenson’s, seems to have been that “pleasures are

more beneficial than duties, because, like the quality of mercy,

they are not strained, and they are twice blest.”

As a part of his early reading he made an exhaustive study of

military writers, from the wars of Sennacherib, Thotmes, and

Rameses down to Napoleon, Wellington, Stonewall Jackson, and von

Moltke. But this he did voluntarily and not as a part of any

required work. Among his favorite books was Marshal Foch’s

“Principes de Guerre”; but he remarked to me on one occasion in

Arabia that his study of Cæsar and Xenophon had been of more value

to him in his desert campaign, because in the irregular war which

he conducted against the Turks he found it necessary to adopt

tactics directly opposed to those advocated by the great French

strategist.

As the subject for his Oxford thesis Lawrence chose the military

architecture of the Crusades, and so absorbed did he become in this

work that he urged his parents to allow him to visit the Near East,

so that he might gain first-hand knowledge of the architectural

efforts of the early knights of Christendom. In this he was

encouraged by the distinguished Oxford scholar and authority on

Arabia, Dr. David George Hogarth, curator of the Ashmolean Museum,

a man who has had an important influence over his entire life down

to the present day, and who even came out to Egypt during the war

and acted as his intimate counselor during the Arabian campaign.

Lawrence’s mother was reluctant to have him leave home but, after

many weeks of pleading, gave her consent to his visiting Syria as

a Cook’s tourist and allowed him two hundred pounds for the trip.

His family was certain that he would return home after a few weeks,

satisfied to settle down for the rest of his days and ready to

forget the heat, the smells, and the inconveniences of life in the

Orient. But on reaching the Near East he scorned tourists’ comforts

and the beaten track. He entered Syria at Beyrouth and, shortly

after landing, adopted native costume and set out barefoot for the

interior. Instead of traveling as a tourist, he wandered off alone,

along the fringe of the Great Arabian Desert, and amused himself

studying the manners and customs of the mosaic of peoples who dwell

in the ancient corridor between Mesopotamia and the Nile Valley.

Two years later, when he finally returned to Oxford to hand in his

thesis and receive his degree, he still had one hundred pounds

left!

There were five boys in the Lawrence family, of which Thomas Edward

was the second youngest. The eldest, Major Montague Lawrence, was

a major in the R. A. M. C.; the second, William, a schoolmaster at

Delhi, in India; the third, Frank, who finished Oxford and wandered

off to the Near East with Thomas; and the youngest, Arnold, a star

track athlete at Oxford, who is also interested in archæology, and

for a time took his brother’s place in Mesopotamia. Both William

and Frank gave their lives to their country on the battle-fields

of France.

Since the war Major Montague Lawrence has taken up work as a

medical missionary in China far up on the Tibetan frontier; their

mother has also gone to this remote corner of Central Asia, while

her youngest son is roaming around the museums of the world on a

traveling fellowship from Oxford, studying the sculpture of the

period of the decadence of Grecian art.

Several years before the war an expedition from Oxford, headed by

Lawrence’s friend Hogarth, the great antiquarian and archæologist,

began excavating in the Euphrates Valley, hoping to uncover traces

of that little-known ancient race, the Hittites. Because of his

intimate knowledge of their language and his sympathetic

understanding of their customs, Lawrence was placed in charge of

the digging gangs of unruly Kurds, Turkomans, Armenians, and Arabs.

This expedition eventually succeeded in uncovering Carchemish, the

ancient capital of the Hittite Empire, and there, amid the ruins

of that long-forgotten city, Lawrence amused himself studying

inscriptions on pottery and joining up the various stages of

Hittite civilization. He and his associate, C. Leonard Woolley,

director of the expedition, actually uncovered ruins which proved

to be the missing link between the civilizations of Nineveh and

Babylon and the beginnings of Greek culture in the islands of the

Mediterranean, which extend back for five thousand years. The

Ashmolean Museum at Oxford contains many exhibits “presented by T.

E. Lawrence” before he was twenty years of age.

An American traveler and director of missions in the Near East

happened to visit the camp of these lonely excavators. He gives us

a vivid picture of his visit and an indication of how Lawrence

received the training which enabled him to gain such an amazing

hold over the desert tribes when the Great War overtook him.

“It was in 1913,” says Mr. Luther R. Fowle. “Easter vacation at

the American College in Aintab had given us the opportunity to make

the three days’ trip by wagon to Curfa, the ancient Edessa. After

Curfa, we had visited Haraun, a few miles to the south, whither

Abraham migrated from Ur of the Chaldees.

“Our return trip to Aintab was by the road farther to the south,

which brought us to the Euphrates River at Jerablus, over which

the Germans were building their great railway bridge, an essential

link in the Berlin-to-Bagdad dream. On the western bank, a few

hundred yards from the bridge, was the site of Carchemish, and

there we found the quiet British scholar, who, under the stress of

the war, was soon to turn from his digging among the ancient ruins

beside the Euphrates to become a shereef of Mecca and leader of a

vast Bedouin host in a successful war to throw off the Ottoman

yoke.

“Mr. Woolley, the archæologist in charge of the work of excavation

of Carchemish, had just come from the diggings, clad in his business

dress of gray flannel shirt and golf-trousers. Lawrence, his

youthful associate, also fresh from the works, was stepping lightly

across the mounds of earth clad in what we Americans would call a

running-suit and wearing at his belt the ornate Arab girdle with

its bunch of tassels at the front, the mark of an unmarried man.

But he was out of sight in a moment; and when we gathered for

supper the freshly tubbed young man in his Oxford tennis-suit of

white flannel bordered with red ribbon, but still wearing his Arab

girdle, launched into the fascinating story of the excavations; of

relations with the Kurds and Arabs about them; of his trips alone

among their villages in search of rare rugs and antiquities, that

gave opportunity for cultivating that close touch and sympathy with

them that subsequently was the basis of his great service in the

time of his country’s need. The meal was delicious and was served

by a powerful, swarthy Arab in elegant native dress, with enough

daggers and revolvers in his girdle to supply a museum. Soon he

entered with the coffee, delicious as only Turkish coffee rightly

made can be. And our British friends, who were hardly able to find

interest in the Roman nut-dishes merely a couple of thousand years

old and part of the rubbish to be cleared away before reaching the

Hittite ruins, pointed out with pride that our little brown

earthenware coffee-cups were unquestionably Hittite and probably

not far from four thousand years old.

“I should not say ‘buildings,’ or even ‘building,’ but rather

‘room’; for we learned that the British Government, because of an

understanding with the Turkish authorities, had given permission

to build only one room. Accordingly Woolley and Lawrence had built

a room of two parallel walls about ten feet apart, extending fifty

feet south, then thirty-five feet westward, and again fifty feet

north. Closed at both ends, this giant letter U was indeed a room;

and, although somewhat astonished, the Turkish Government had to

concede the fact. Of course, the honorable inspector could not

object if little partitions were run across to separate the sleeping

portions from the dining-room and office, and in due time

convenience demanded that doors be opened from various parts of

the structure into the court. Thus it was that, when we first saw

it, on the right was a series of rooms for the storage of

antiquities and for photographic work; on the left were the

sleeping-rooms of the excavators and their guests; and in the

center was the delightful living-room with open fireplaces, built-in

bookcases filled with well-worn leather-bound volumes of the

classics with which a British scholar would naturally surround

himself, and a long table covered with the current British papers

as well as the archæological journals of all the world.

“Around the fireplace we learned much of the good faith and

friendship that existed between these two lone Englishmen and the

native people around them. They insisted that they were safer on

the banks of the Euphrates than if they had been in Piccadilly.

The leaders of the two most feared bands of brigands in the region,

Kurdish and Arab, were faithful employees of the excavators, one

as night-watchman, the other in a similar position of trust. Of

course there was no stealing and no danger. Had not these men eaten

of the Englishman’s salt? Moreover, the even-handed justice of the

two Englishmen was so well known and respected that they had come

to be the judges of various issues of all sorts between rival

villages, or in personal disagreement. Never abusing their

prerogatives, their decisions were never questioned. Lawrence had

recently been out to a village to settle the difficulties arising

out of the kidnapping of a young woman by the man who wished to

marry her and who had been unable to overcome her father’s

objections. Could any training have been better for the part he

was to play in the great Arab awakening than these experiences

among the native people?

“In the living-room was an ancient wooden chest which may once have

held the dowry of a desert bride, but which now served as money-box

and safety-deposit vault. Larger than a wardrobe-trunk, there it

stood, unlocked and unguarded. It was full of the silver money with

which to pay the two hundred men working on the excavations. But

such was the unwritten law of the community, such the love of the

workers for their leaders, and so sure and summary the punishment

which they themselves would mete out to any of their number taking

advantage of this trust, that the cash could not have been safer

in the vaults of the Bank of England itself.

“All this contrasted sharply with the methods and experiences of

the German engineers half a mile away, building the Bagdad

railway-bridge across the Euphrates. They and their workers seemed

fated to mutual distrust and hatred. The Teuton could not see why

the Arab should not and would not accept his régime of discipline

and punishment. The Germans were always needing more laborers,

while the Englishmen, a few hundred yards away, were overwhelmed

with them. Once when the latter were forced to cut down their staff

they tried in vain to dismiss fifty men. The Arabs and Kurds just

smiled and went on with their work. They were told they would get

no pay, but they smiled and worked on. If not for pay, they would

work for the love of it and of their masters. And so they did. Nor

was the excavation without interest to those simple men. They had

caught the enthusiasms of their leaders, who had taught them to

share in the joy of the work; their digging was not meaningless

toil for foreign money, but was rather a sharing of the joy of

archæology.

“We retired for the night, our minds filled with the stories of

the East, in which Christian and pagan, Hittite, Greek, and Roman,

the great past and the sordid present of these regions were mingled

with the background of energetic German effort and the calm

achievement by two modest and capable representatives of the

British breed of men. We slept long and well on the familiar

folding cots in our clean, mud-walled room; nor were our slumbers

troubled by our bed-covers, Damascus _yorgans_ of cloth of gold,

upon which a rare arabesque on its background of dull red invited

the eye to journeys without end. These ancient covers were some of

Lawrence’s treasures, brought back from his frequent trips to the

Arab villages, when for weeks his whereabouts were unknown. It was

during these journeys that he in native garb joined in the

conversation of the village elders on the shady side of a tent, or

came to understand and admire the Arab in quiet intercourse before

an open fire, where, sitting cross-legged on the floor, when the

coffee had been made and silently drunk, one and another spoke.

While forty German engineers were building their bridge, which was

to enable them to coerce these people in case they would not obey,

one broad-minded kindly Englishman was unconsciously preparing to

become the man who in the great crisis was to lead this people,

not only to destroy the Teuton dream of conquest, but to break the

centuries-old political servitude of the Turk.

“After breakfast we were examining the mosaic floor of the

dining-room, a Roman fragment that these men had taken out whole

rather than destroy it in their search for the Hittite antiquities

hidden below. But just then word came of excitement at the ‘works.’

We hurried over to find the Arabs and Kurds closely packed around

a large excavation. The Greek foreman was removing the age-old

earth about a dark stone several feet square; and by the time Mr.

Woolley had reached his side, he had determined which was the real

face of the block. With practised hand, Mr. Woolley began to remove

the last crust of soil which covered the treasure underneath. There

was no one to command those peasants to go back to their work, for

the spiritual fruits of discovery belong to all, to the Englishman

no more than to the water-boy who left his donkey to find the

Euphrates alone, while he joined the breathless group whose eyes

were glued on Woolley’s jack-knife deftly doing its work. A burst

of applause greeted the first appearance of something in relief on

the hard rock. It was a hand! no—a corner of a building!—a lion!—a

camel! Guess and conjecture flew about, to be greeted by approval

or derision, always followed by quick, tense silence, while the

jack-knife did its work. Soon Woolley’s trained eye revealed to

him that it was a large animal standing in a perfect state of

preservation and that he was uncovering its head. His feint to

begin at the other end of the figure was greeted by a babble of

protest from his workmen, not yet sure what the figure was.

Woolley’s quick smile acknowledged the reception of his little

joke, and back he went to the spot already uncovered. Soon head,

chest, legs, body, came to light, and exponents of various

theories—cow, horse, sheep—were still backing their claims in

musical gutturals when Woolley’s hand returned to the head of the

animal and with a few quick motions lifted off the earth which

covered the perfect tracery of a magnificent pair of antlers; alive

with the undying art of forty centuries, there stood revealed

before us a superb stag. Such a discovery was worth a celebration,

and unwritten law had ordained the nature of it. For the excavator

nodded in response to the Greek’s whispered query; and, as he gave

the awaited signal, two hundred boys from fifteen to sixty-five

emptied all the chambers of their revolvers in the air. I wonder

what the Germans thought as they heard the volley from their

bridge; for, as I found out a few weeks later when I had galloped

over for another visit with the Englishman, shots at the German

place meant something far different. To-day, perspiring as much

because of their intense excitement over the discovery of the

Hittite stag as from their labors, the Arabs laughingly sat down

to smoke the cigarettes which ended these celebrations, while the

water-boy started wildly in search of his donkey, followed by the

vigorous epithets of his thirsty friends, who knew that the full

flavor of a cigarette comes only with a drink of cold water.

“Noon came all too soon; and it was Thursday, the pay-day. Friday

was the Moslem Sabbath, and these Englishmen were too Christian in

their relations with their Moslem workers to make them labor on

their chosen day. Our drive to Aintab was short, and so we delayed

to see the men paid off, on Lawrence’s assurance that it would be

interesting.

“A table was set in the open court of the ‘room,’ and Woolley

handed out the piasters to the line of workers. That was simple,

but the men had learned to bring their discoveries in on pay-days,

and they received cash rewards for everything turned in. Of course,

the result was exceeding care on their part to lose or break no

fragment in their work; and in fact rare discoveries were sent in

from all the country-side on these pay-days. The excavators would

glance at the article offered. One man would receive a ten-piaster

bonus for what he brought in, perhaps more to encourage him than

because it had any real worth; another would have a fragment of

pottery smilingly returned to him by the judge, while his companions

laughed at him for trying to pass off on the alert Woolley part of

a modern water-jar. Never did the Englishman say, ‘I can pay you

nothing for this, but I will keep it just the same!’ It was either

paid for or returned to the owner. Occasionally a gold coin, bright

as the Arab’s eyes, would reward some happy man; but whether he

got the gold or a laugh, never was the decision of his master and

friend questioned.

“As we tinkled across the plain to the rhythm of the bells on the

horses’ necks, we had food for thought in what we had seen. If

Britain governs much of the world, we wondered if it did not

because of the merit, capacity, and good sense of her sons in all

lands. Impressions of this chance visit to Carchemish were deepened

by residence in Constantinople throughout the World War, where we

watched the German play for the big stake, of which the Euphrates

Bridge was but an incident. And the German lost because of the way

he went after it.

“Thomas Lawrence worked another way. His extraordinary achievement

was wonderful beyond measure. But it was not a miracle. It was but

the outworking of intelligence, imagination, sympathy, character.”

Robert Louis Stevenson in “An Apology for Idlers” deplores that

“many who have ‘plied their book diligently’ and know all about

some branch or other of accepted lore, come out of the study with

an ancient and owl-like demeanor, and prove dry, stockish and

dyspeptic in the better and brighter parts of life.” But in Lawrence

Stevenson would have found a kindred spirit. Though scholar and

scientist, he is neither bookish nor owlish. During the early days

of the Arabian Revolution, a Captain Lloyd, now Sir George Lloyd,

recent governor of Bombay, was in the desert with him for a short

while. He once said to me: “It is difficult to describe the delight

of intimate association with such a man. I found him both poet and

philosopher, but possessor of an unfailing sense of humor.”

Mr. Luther Fowle’s description of that “U-shaped room” at Carchemish

is an illustration of this same sense of humor which makes Lawrence

so thoroughly human, and which saved his life on more than one

occasion. Major Young, of the Near Eastern Secret Corps, who in

pre-war days had known Lawrence in Mesopotamia, relates another

incident. Representatives of England, Germany, France, Russia, and

Turkey met in 1912 and agreed to an arrangement which gave the

Germans control of the important strategic harbor of Alexandretta,

and also permission to continue the railway which they long had

wanted to extend through from Berlin to Bagdad in order to open up

a direct route to the treasure-vaults of Hindustan and Far Cathay.

Lawrence, with his intimate knowledge of history, saw in this a

bold Prussian threat against British power in Asia. Upon learning

of the agreement he immediately hurried down to Cairo, demanded an

audience with Lord Kitchener, and asked K. of K. why Germany had

been permitted to get control of Alexandretta, the vital port to

which Disraeli referred when he said that the peace of the world

would one day depend on the control of that point on the coast of

Asia Minor toward which the finger of Cyprus pointed. Kitchener

replied:

“I have warned London repeatedly, but the Foreign Office pays no

attention. Within two years there will be a World War. Unfortunately,

young man, you and I can’t stop it, so run along and sell your

papers.”

Although deeply chagrined because Britain, wrapped in slumber, had

allowed Germany to extend her sphere of influence all the way from

the Baltic to the Persian Gulf, Lawrence decided to amuse himself

by “pulling the leg” of the German engineers who were working with

feverish haste on the Berlin-to-Bagdad Railway. Loading sections

of drainage-pipe on the backs of mules, he transported them from

Carchemish to the hills which looked down on the new railroad right

of way. There he carefully mounted them on piles of sand. The

German engineers observed them through their field-glasses, and,

as Lawrence had hoped, they mistook these harmless and innocent

pipes for British cannons. Frantically they wired to both

Constantinople and Berlin declaring that the British were fortifying

all the commanding positions. Meanwhile, Lawrence and Woolley were

laughing up their sleeves.

At Jerablus, northeast of Aleppo, the Germans were at work on a

great bridge over the Euphrates. In their typically German way they

painted numbers on the coats of their native workmen as a means of

identifying them. They never even attempted to learn their names.

They even committed the folly of allowing blood-enemies to dig

together. Of course, instead of digging holes for bridge-piles,

they dug holes in each other. This went on for a time, and then

the seven hundred Kurd workmen turned on their German masters and

attacked them. Three hundred of the digging gang at Carchemish

joined their relatives and started a simultaneous attack from the

rear. Fortunately for the kaiser’s myrmidons, Lawrence and Woolley

arrived on the scene in time to prevent a massacre. As a result of

their heroism both archæologists were awarded the Turkish order of

the Medjidieh by the sultan. That was early in 1914, before the

Great War found Lawrence.

One of his first expeditions in the Near East was for the Palestine

Exploration Fund. Lawrence and Woolley attempted to follow the

footsteps of the Israelites through the Wilderness. Along with

other discoveries they found what is believed to be the Kadesh

Barnea of the Bible, the historic spot where Moses brought water

gushing from the rock. First they located a place in the Sinai

Peninsula which the Bedouin called Ain Kadis, where there was one

insignificant well; and perhaps it was there that the Israelites

began complaining to Moses regarding the shortage of water.

“If that really was the place,” remarked Lawrence, “one could

hardly blame the Israelites for grousing.”

Some five miles distant the two archæologists came upon a number

of fine springs in a little valley called Gudurat, and they are of

the opinion that this was where Moses succeeded in regaining the

confidence of the children of Israel, by quenching their thirst

with the sparkling waters of these springs. Later on Woolley and

Lawrence wrote a small book concerning this expedition entitled,

“The Wilderness of Sin.” In it they tell of finding traces of a

civilization dating back to 2500 b. c., the oldest traces

of human habitation ever discovered on the Sinai Peninsula.

Woolley has written a delightful book published by the Oxford

University Press entitled, “Dead Towns and Living Men,” in which

he describes the archæological experiences of Lawrence and himself

before the World War. One story throws considerable light on the

differences between the methods of these two men in dealing with

the natives and the tactics of the Germans at work on the

Berlin-Bagdad line:

Our house-boy, Ahmed, was coming back one day from

shopping in the village, and passed a gang of natives working

on the railway whose foreman owed him money. Ahmed

demanded payment of the debt, the foreman refused, and a

wordy wrangle followed. A German engineer on his rounds

saw that work was being hindered by an outsider, but instead

of just ordering him off, he called up the two soldiers

of his bodyguard, seized the unfortunate Ahmed, and without

any inquiry as to the origin of rights of the dispute, had

him soundly flogged. Ahmed returned to the house full of

woe, and as I was away Lawrence went up to the German

camp to seek redress.

He found Contzen and told him that one of his engineers

had assaulted our house-servant and must accordingly

apologize. Contzen pooh-poohed the whole affair. When

Lawrence showed him that he was in earnest, however, he

consented to make inquiries and sent for the engineer in

question. After talking to him he turned angrily on Lawrence:

“I told you the whole thing was a lie,” he said;

“Herr X—— never assaulted the man at all; he merely had

him flogged!”

“Well, don’t you call that an assault?” asked Lawrence.

“Certainly not,” replied the German. “You can’t use

these natives without flogging them. We have men thrashed

every day; it’s the only method.”

“We’ve been here longer than you have,” Lawrence retorted,

“and have never beaten one of our men yet, and we

don’t intend to let _you_ start on them. That engineer of

yours must come down with me to the village and apologize

to Ahmed in public.”

Contzen laughed. “Nonsense!” he said, and then, turning

his back; “the incident is closed.”

“On the contrary,” replied Lawrence, “if you don’t do as

I ask I shall take the matter into my own hands.”

Contzen turned round again. “Which means—” he

asked.

“That I shall take your engineer down to the village and

there _flog him!_”

“You couldn’t and you daren’t do such a thing!” cried

the scandalized German; but Lawrence pointed out that

there was good reason for assuming that he both dared and

could; and in the end the engineer had to make his apology

_coram publico_, to the vast amusement of the villagers.

For seven years Lawrence wandered up and down the desert, often

accompanied by Woolley but more frequently alone in native garb.

At one time the British Museum sent him on a short expedition to

the interior of the island of Sumatra, where he had escapes from

head-hunters almost as thrilling as his adventures in Arabia. But

of these we could never persuade him to speak. Some day, perhaps,

he may tell us of them in his memoirs.

I had often wondered why he had chosen Arabia as the field for his

archæological work, instead of Egypt, which is the Mecca and Medina

for most men who love to dig among the ruins of antiquity. His

reply was typical of him. He said:

“Egypt has never appealed to me. Most of the important work there

has been done; and most Egyptologists to-day spend too much of

their time trying to discover just when the third whisker was

painted on the scarab!”

Photograph: DATE-PALMS ALONG THE CORAL SHORE OF ARABY

Photograph: LAWRENCE AT HEADQUARTERS IN CAIRO

Photograph: THE ARCHÆOLOGIST AND POET WHO TURNED SOLDIER

With Lawrence in Arabia · 第 2 / 33 章