AWAY WITH THE NUISANCE.

The people of Salt Lake City are waking up to the realization

of the trouble of which our cousins out in the country are

complaining. The sulphurous fumes which have been tasted by

many folks here, particularly late at night, are not only those

of a partisan nature emanating from the smokestacks of the

slanderers and maligners, but are treats bestowed upon our

citizens by the smelters, and are samples of the goods, or

rather evils, which farmers and horticulturists have been

burdened with so long. Complaints have come to us from some of

the best people of the city, of different faiths and parties,

that the air has been laden with sulphurous fumes that can net

only be felt in the throat, but tasted in the mouth, and they

rest upon the city at night, appearing like a thin fog.

The fact is this smelter smoke will have to go; there is no

mistake about that. If the smelters can not consume it, they

will have to close up. This fair county must not be devastated

and this city must not be rendered unhealthful by any such a

nuisance as that which has been borne with now for a long time.

The evasive policy that has been pursued, the tantalizing

treatment toward the farmers who have vainly sought for

redress, the destruction that has come upon vegetation and upon

live stock, and now the choking fumes that reach this city all

demand some practical remedy in place of the shilly-shally of

the past.

The Deseret News has counseled peace, consideration for the

smelter people in the difficulties that they have to meet,

favor toward a valuable industry that should be encouraged on

proper lines, and arbitration instead of litigation. But it

really seems now as though an aggressive policy will have to be

pursued, or ruin will come to the agricultural pursuits of Salt

Lake County, while the city will not escape from the ravages of

the smelter fiend. If the companies that control those works

will not or can not dispose of the poisonous metallic fumes

that pour out of their smokestacks, the fires will have to he

banked and the nuisance suppressed. We do not believe the

latter is the necessary alternative. We are of opinion that the

evil can be disposed of, and we are sure that efforts ought to

be made to effect it without further delay.

It looks as if the courts will have to be appealed to to obtain

compensation for damages already inflicted. Also that they will

have to be applied to for injunctions against the continuance

of the cause of the trouble. We think there is law enough now

to proceed under. But if that is not the case, then legislation

must be had to fully cover the ground. Litigation will have to

come first, legislation afterwards. However that may be,

temporizing with the evil will not do. Patience has ceased to

be a virtue in this matter. The conviction is fastening itself

upon the public mind that no active steps are intended by the

responsible parties, but simply a policy of delay. They must be

taught that this will not answer the purpose, and that the

injured people will not be fooled in that way. The smelter

smoke must go. And it must not go in the old way.

The proposition to put the matter in the hands of experts

chosen by the complainants is not to be seriously considered.

The onus is upon the smelter men; they are the offenders, and

they must take the steps necessary to remove the cause of

complaint, and also reimburse those who have been injured. We

do not ask anything unreasonable. We join with those of our

citizens who Intend that this beautiful part of our lovely

State shall not be laid waste, even if the only cure is the

suppression of the destroying cause. This may as well be

understood first as last. Useless practical measures are

adopted to abate the evil, active proceedings will have to be

taken and pushed to the utmost to remove entirely the root and

branch and trunk and body of this tree of destruction. The

people affected are deeply in earnest, and they certainly mean

business.

Mr. KEARNS. Mr. President, I must not burden you with too many details,

but in order for you to see how complete is the business power of this

man I will cite you to one case. The Great Salt Lake is estimated to

contain 14,000,000,000 tons of salt. Probably salt can be made cheaper

on the shores of this lake than anywhere else in the world. Nearly all

its shore line is adaptable for salt gardens. The president of the

church is interested in a large salt monopoly which has gathered in the

various smaller enterprises. He is president of a railroad which runs

from the salt gardens to Salt Lake City, connecting there with trunk

lines. It costs to manufacture the salt and place it on board the cars

75 cents per ton. He receives for it $5 and $6 per ton. His company and

its subsidiary corporation are probably capitalized at three-quarters of

a million dollars, and upon this large sum he is able to pay dividends

of 8 or 10 per cent.

Not long since two men, who for many years had been tithe payers and

loyal members of the church, undertook to establish a salt garden along

the line of a trunk railway. One of them was a large dealer in salt, and

proposed to extend his trade by making the salt and reaching territory

prohibited to him by the church price of salt; the other was the owner

of the land upon which it was proposed to establish the salt garden.

These men formed a corporation, put in pumping stations and flumes, and

the corporation became indebted to one of the financial institutions

over which the church exercised considerable influence. Then the

president of the church sent for them. There is scarcely an instance on

record where a message of this kind failed of its purpose. These men

went to meet the prophet, seer, and revelator of God, as they supposed,

but he had laid aside his robes of sanctity for the moment and he was a

plain, unadorned, aggressive, if not an able, business man. He first

denounced them for interfering with a business which he had made

peculiarly his own; and, when they protested that they had no intention

to interfere with his trade, but were seeking new markets, he declared

in a voice of thunderous passion that if they did not cease with their

projected enterprise, he would crush them. They escaped from his

presence feeling like courtiers repulsed from the foot of a king's

throne, and then surveyed their enterprise. If they stopped, they would

lose all the money invested and their enterprise would possibly be sold

out to their creditors; if they went on and invested more money, the

president had the power, as he had threatened, to crush them. Not only

could he ruin their enterprise, but he could ostracise them socially and

could make of them marked and shunned men in the community where they

had always been respected.

Is there menace in this system? To me it seems like a great danger to

all the people who are now affected, and therefore of great danger to

the people of the United States, because the power of this monarchy

within the Republic is constantly extending. If it be an evil, every

apostle is in part responsible for this tyrannical course. He helped to

elect the president; he does the president's bidding, and shares in the

advantages of that tyranny.

I did not call the social system a violation of the pledges to the

country, but I do affirm that the business tyranny of Mormon leaders is

an express violation of the covenant made, for they do not leave their

followers free in secular affairs. They tyrannize over them, and their

tyranny spreads even to the Gentiles. In all this I charge that every

apostle is a party to the wrong and to the violation. Although I speak

of the president of the church as the leader, the monarch in fact, every

apostle is one of his ministers, one of his creators, and also one of

his creatures, and possibly his successor; and the whole system depends

upon the manner in which the apostles and the other leaders shall

support the chief leader. As no apostle has ever protested against this

system, but has, by every means in his power, encouraged it, he can not

escape his share of the responsibility for it. It is an evil; they aid

it. It is a violation of the pledge upon which statehood was granted;

they profit by it.

Conditions in Utah Speech of Hon. Thomas Kearns of Utah, in the Senate of the United States · 第 10 / 14 题