STONE VILLAGES.

Ruins of villages built of stone, either roughly dressed or merely

selected, represent the highest degree of art in architecture attained

by the aborigines of Verde valley, and the best example of this class of

ruin is found on the eastern side of the river, about a mile above the

mouth of Limestone creek. The site was selected without reference to

defense, and is overlooked by the hills which circumscribe a large

semicircular area of bottom land, on the northern end of which the

village was located. This is the largest ruin on the Verde; it covers an

area of about 450 feet square, or over 5 acres, and has some 225 rooms

on the ground plan. From the amount of debris we may infer that most of

the rooms were but one story in height; and a reasonable estimate of the

total number of rooms in the village when it was occupied would make the

number not greater than 300 rooms. The ratio of rooms to inhabitants in

the present pueblos would give a population for this village of about

450 persons. Zuñi, the largest inhabited pueblo, covering an area of

about 5 acres, has a population of 1,600.

It will thus be seen that, while the area covered by this village was

quite large, the population was comparatively small; in other words, the

dense clustering and so-called beehive structure which characterize Zuñi

and Taos, and are seen to a less extent in Oraibi, and which result from

long-continued pressure of hostile tribes upon a village occupying a

site not in itself easily defensible, has not been carried to such an

extent here as in the examples cited. But it is also apparent that this

village represents the beginning of the process which in time produces a

village like Zuñi or Taos.

Plate XII exhibits the ground plan of the village. It will be observed

that this plan is remarkably similar in general characters to the ground

plan of Zuñi.[2] A close inspection will reveal the presence of many

discrepancies in the plan, which suggest that the village received at

various times additions to its population in considerable numbers, and

was not the result of the gradual growth of one settlement nor the home

of a large group coming en masse to this locality. It has been shown[3]

that in the old provinces of Tusayan and Cibola (Moki and Zuñi) the

present villages are the result of the aggregation of many related

gentes and subgentes, who reached their present location at different

times and from different directions, and this seems to be the almost

universal rule for the larger pueblos and ruins. It should be noted in

this connection, however, that, the preceding statements being granted,

a general plan of this character indicates an essentially modern origin

or foundation.

[Footnote 2: Eighth Ann. Rep. Bureau of Ethnology, 1886-’87, Wash.,

1891, pl. lxxvi.]

[Footnote 3: Ibid., pp. 1-228.]

The ground plan shows a number of courts or open spaces, which divided

the village into four well-defined clusters. The largest court was

nearly in the center of the village, and within it (as shown, on the

plan) there are traces of a small single-room structure that may have

been a kiva of sacred chamber. Attached to this main court and extending

eastward is another court of considerable size, and connected with this

second court at its eastern end there is another one almost square in

plan and of fair size. West of the main court may be seen a small court

opening into it, and north of this another square space separated from

the main court by a single stone wall and inclosed on the other three

sides by rooms. In addition to these there are two completely inclosed

small courts in the center of the southwestern cluster, and another one

of moderate size between the southwestern and southern clusters.

The arrangement of these courts is highly suggestive. The central space

was evidently the main court of the village at the time of its greatest

development, and it is equally evident that it was inclosed at a later

period than the small inclosed courts immediately adjacent to it, for

had the latter not preceded it they would not occupy the positions they

now do. Plate XIII represents a part of the main court, and beyond the

débris can be seen a small portion of the bottom upon which the village

is built. To the left, in the foreground of the illustration, are traces

of a small detached room, perhaps the main kiva[4] of the village; this

is also shown on the ground plan, plate XII.

[Footnote 4: The kiva is the assembly chamber, termed estufa in

some of the older writings, particularly those of the early Spanish

explorers. A full description of these peculiar structures has

already been published in an article on Pueblo architecture; Eighth

Ann. Rep. Bureau of Ethnology, 1886-’87, Wash., 1891, pp. 1-228.]

The smaller courts are but little larger than the largest rooms, but it

will be noticed that while some of the rooms are quite large they are

always oblong. This requirement was dictated by the length of available

roofing timbers. The cottonwood groves on the river bank would provide

timber of fair size but of very poor quality, and, aside from this,

roofing timbers longer than 15 feet could be obtained only at points

many miles distant. In either case the hauling of these timbers to the

site of the village would be a work of great labor and considerable

difficulty. The width of the rooms was, therefore, limited to about 20

feet, most of them being under 15 feet; but this limitation did not

apply to the courts, which, though sometimes surrounded on all sides by

buildings, were always open to the sky.

[Illustration: Plate XVI.

RUIN AT MOUTH OF FOSSIL CREEK.]

It is probable that the central and northern portion of the southwestern

cluster comprised the first rooms built in this village. This is the

portion which commands the best outlook over the bottom, and it is also

on the highest ground. Following this the southern cluster was probably

built; afterwards the northern cluster was added, and finally the

northwestern cluster. Subsequently rooms connecting these clusters and

the eastern end of the village were built up, and probably last of all

were added the rooms which occupied what was originally the eastern end

of the main court. This hypothetic order of building the clusters

composing the village is supported by the character of the site and the

peculiarities of the ground plan. Most of the rooms in the northwestern

cluster and in the eastern part of the village were but one story in

height, while the crowding in the interior of the village, direct

evidence of which is seen on the ground plan, could take place only

after the rooms surrounding that area had been located, and when hostile

pressure from outside made it undesirable to extend the bounds of the

village; in other words, at the latest stage in the growth of the

village.

The arrangement and distribution of the rooms within the clusters

indicate an occupancy extending over a considerable period of time.

A reference to the ground plan will show that continuous wall lines are

the exception, and it is seldom that more than two or three rooms are

grouped together in regular order. In irregularity of arrangement the

inhabitants of this village followed a general habit, the result of

which can be seen today in all the inhabited villages and in most of the

large pueblo ruins. It indicates a steady growth of the village by the

addition of rooms, one or two at a time, as they were needed. The

division into clusters, however, indicates an aggregation of related

gentes or subgentes banded together for protection. Given these

conditions, (1) bands of related families living near one another; (2)

hostile pressure from outside; and (3) a site not in itself easily

defended, and a ground plan similar to the one under discussion must

result. Single detached rooms would not be built when the village might

be attacked at any time, but they might be added during periods of peace

and, the conditions being favorable, they might form the nuclei of other

clusters. It is possible that some of the clusters forming this village

had their origin in this manner, but this question can not be determined

from the ground plan, as a similar result would be produced by the

advent of a small band of related families.

Growth in number of rooms does not necessarily indicate growth in

population, and this qualification must not be lost sight of in the

discussion of pueblo ground plans. Among the Pueblos of today, descent,

in real property at least, is in the female line; when a man marries he

becomes a member of his wife’s family and leaves his own home to live

with his wife’s people. If the wife’s home is not large enough to

contain all the members of the household, additional rooms are built

adjoining and connected with those previously occupied. It may be

mentioned in this connection that the women build the houses, although

the men supply the material and do the heavy work. The result of this

custom may be readily seen: a family in which there are many daughters

must necessarily increase the space occupied by it, while a family

consisting of sons, no matter how many they may be, will become extinct,

so far as regards its home in the village. It is no uncommon thing to

see in the villages of today several rooms in course of erection while

there are a dozen or more rooms within a few steps abandoned and going

to decay. Long occupancy, therefore, produces much the same effect on a

ground plan of a village as a large population, or a rapidly growing

one, except that in the former case irregularity in the arrangement of

rooms will be more pronounced.

It will be noticed that the size of rooms is more varied in the

southwestern and southern clusters than in the remaining portions of the

village. In the southwestern cluster rooms measuring 8 feet by 18 or 20

are not uncommon. These occur principally in the central and

southwestern part of the cluster, while in the northern and northeastern

part the rooms are uncommonly large, one of them measuring about 40 feet

in length by nearly 15 feet in width and presenting a floor area of 600

square feet. Rooms approaching this size are more common, however, in

the northern and northwestern clusters. In these latter clusters long

narrow rooms are the exception and a number of almost square ones are

seen. The smallest room in the village is in the center of the southern

cluster, on the highest ground within the area covered by the ruin; it

measures 6 feet by 10, with a floor area of 60 square feet, as opposed

to the 600 square feet of the largest room. This small room was probably

at one time a small open space between two projecting rooms, such as are

often seen in the inhabited pueblos. Later the room on the south was

built and the front of the space was walled up in order to make a

rectangular area, thus forming the small room shown on the ground plan.

The maximum length of any room is about 40 feet, the maximum width

attained is about 20 feet, and in a general way it may be stated that

the average size of the rooms is considerably larger than that of the

rooms in the northern ruins.

From the regularity in distribution of the debris now on the ground,

it appears that the rooms of the northwestern and northern clusters,

including the eastern part of the village, were almost uniformly one

story in height, and most of the rooms in the other clusters were also

limited in height to a single story. The only places on the ground plan

where rooms of two stories might have existed are the northern and

central parts of the southwestern and southern clusters, and perhaps the

southern side of the northern cluster; the last, however, being very

doubtful.

[Illustration: Plate XVII.

GROUND PLAN OF RUINS OPPOSITE VERDE.]

In the scarcity of detached rooms or small clusters the plan of this

village strongly resembles the ground plan of Zuñi. Only three detached

rooms are seen in the plan. One of these, situated in the main or

central court, has already been referred to as probably the remains of a

kiva or sacred chamber. Another single room occurs outside of the

village, near its southwestern corner. This was probably a dwelling

room, for a kiva would hardly be located in this place. The third room

is found also outside the village and at its southeastern corner. The

space inclosed within the walls of this room measured about 7 feet by 4

and the lines of wall are at an acute angle with the wall lines of the

village. This structure is anomalous, and its purpose is not clear.

The absence of clearly defined traces of passageways to the interior of

the village is noticeable. This absence can hardly be attributed to the

advanced state of decay in the ruin, for nearly all the wall lines can

still be easily traced. At one point only is there a suggestion of an

open passageway similar to those found in the inhabited pueblos. This

occurs in the southeastern corner of the ground plan, between the

southern cluster and the southern part of the northeastern cluster.

It was about 25 feet long and but 6 feet wide in the clear. There were

undoubtedly other passageways to the interior courts, but they were

probably roofed over and perhaps consisted of rooms abandoned for that

purpose. This, however, is anomalous.

There are several other anomalous features in the ground plan, the

purposes of which are not clear. Prominent among them is a heavy wall

extending about halfway across the southern, side of the village and at

some distance from it. The total length of this wall is 164 feet; it is

4 feet thick (nearly twice the thickness of the other walls), and is

pierced near its center by an opening or gateway 4 feet wide. The

nearest rooms of the village on the north are over 40 feet away. This

wall is now much broken down, but here and there, as shown on the plan,

portions of the original wall lines are left. It is probable that its

original height did not exceed 5 or 6 feet. The purpose of this

structure is obscure; it could not have been erected for defense, for it

has no defensive value whatever; it had no connection with the houses of

the village, for it is too far removed from them. The only possible use

of this wall that occurs to the writer is that it was a dam or retaining

wall for a shallow pool of water, fed by the surface drainage of a small

area on the east and northeast. There is at present a very slight

depression between the wall and the first houses of the village toward

the north--about a foot or a foot and a half--but there may have been a

depression of 2 or 3 feet here at one time and this depression may have

been subsequently filled up by sediment. This conjecture could be easily

tested by excavating a trench across the area between the wall and the

houses, but in the absence of such an excavation the suggestion is a

mere surmise.

Another anomalous feature is found in the center of the southwestern

cluster. Here, in two different rooms, are found walls of double the

usual thickness, occurring, however, on only one or two sides of the

rooms. These are clearly shown on the ground plan. The westernmost of

the two rooms which exhibit this feature has walls of normal thickness

on three of its sides, while the fourth or eastern side consists of two

walls of normal thickness, built side by side, perhaps the result of

some domestic quarrel. The eastern room, however, has thick walls on its

northern and eastern sides, and in this case the walls are built solidly

at one time, not consisting, as in the previous case, of two walls of

ordinary thickness built side by side. An inspection of the ground plan

will show that in both these cases this feature is anomalous and

probably unimportant.

A ruin of the same general type as that just described, but much smaller

in size, is found about 6 miles farther northward on the eastern side of

the river. It is located on the river edge of a large semicircular flat

or terrace, near its northern end, and is built of flat slabs of

limestone and river bowlders. It is rectangular in plan and of moderate

size. On the southern end of the same flat are two single-room rancher’s

houses and a large corral. The rooms in this ruin are oblong and similar

in size and arrangement to those just described.

[Illustration: Figure 279.

Sketch map, site of small ruin 10 miles north of Fossil creek.]

About 11 miles above the last-described ruin, or 17 miles above the

large ruin near Limestone creek, there is another small ruin of the same

general type as the last, located on a similar site, and in all

respects, except size, closely similar to it.

About 3 miles below the mouth of the East Verde there is still another

ruin of similar character, located on the edge of a mesa or bench

overlooking the river. It is built of bowlders and slabs of rock. Like

the others this ruin is rectangular in plan and of small size.

About 10 miles north of the mouth of Fossil creek, on the point of a

bench or terrace on the western side of the river, and perhaps 20 feet

above it, occurs a small ruin, similar in character to the preceding.

The river here makes a long turn eastward, then flows south again, and

in the angle a small bench or terrace is formed. At this point the

mountains rise abruptly from the river on both sides to a height of over

a thousand feet. Fig. 279 illustrates the location of this ruin. So far

as could be distinguished from the hills opposite, the rooms occur in

two broken lines at right angles to each other.

[Illustration: Plate XVIII.

GENERAL VIEW OF RUINS OPPOSITE VERDE.]

These four small ruins are all closely similar to the large ruin

described above in all respects except size, and peculiarities of ground

plan attendant on size. The rooms are always rectangular, generally

oblong, and arranged without regularity as regards their longer axis.

Except the one last described, the ruins consist of compact masses of

rooms, without evidences of interior courts, all of very small size, and

all located without reference to defense. The last-described ruin

differs from the others only in the arrangement of rooms. There is

practically no standing wall remaining in any of them, and even now they

can be seen for miles from the hills above. When the walls were standing

they must have been conspicuous landmarks. The masonry of all consists

of flat bowlders, selected doubtless from the river bed, or perhaps

sometimes quarried from the terraces, which themselves contain large

numbers of river bowlders. In general appearance and in plan these ruins

resemble the ruin next to be described, situated near the mouth of the

East Verde.

[Illustration: Figure 280.

Ground plan of ruin at mouth of the East Verde.]

On the southern side of the East Verde, half a mile above its mouth, a

small creek comes in from the south, probably dry throughout most of the

year; and on a promontory or point of land left by this creek a small

ruin occurs. It is similar in plan and in character of masonry to those

just described, and differs from them only in that its site is better

adapted for defense, being protected on two sides by steep hills or

cliffs. The ground plan of this ruin is shown in figure 280, and its

general appearance in plate XIV, which also shows the character of

masonry. The village overlooked a large area of low bottom land in the

angle between the Verde and the East Verde, and is itself overlooked by

the foothills rising behind it to the high mesas forming part of the

Mazatzal mountains.

The walls of this village were built of flat bowlders and slabs of

limestone, and there is now practically no standing wall remaining. The

ground plan shows a number of places where the walls are still visible,

but they extend only a few inches above the debris. There were about

forty rooms, and the plan is characterized by irregularities such as

have already been noticed in other plans. Although the village was of

considerable size it was built up solidly, and there is no trace of an

interior court. It will be noticed that the rooms vary much in size, and

that many of the smaller rooms are one half the size of the larger ones,

as though the larger rooms had been divided by partitions after they

were completed. It is probable that rooms extended partly down the slope

on the west and south of the village toward the little creek before

mentioned, but if this were the case all evidences have long since been

obliterated.

On the southern side of the village the ground plan shows a bit of

curved wall. It is doubtful whether this was an actual wall or merely a

terrace. If it was a wall it is the only example of curved wall found in

the region in ruins of this class. Between this wall or terrace and the

adjoining wall on the north, with which it was connected, the ground is

now filled in. Whether this filling occurred prior or subsequent to the

abandonment of the village does not appear. The northeastern corner of

the ruin is marked by a somewhat similar feature. Here there is a line

of wall now almost obliterated and but feebly marked by debris, and the

space between it and the village proper is partly filled in, forming a

low terrace. Analogous features are found in several other ruins in this

region, notably in the large ruin near Limestone creek. It should be

noted in this connection that Mr. E. W. Nelson has found that places

somewhat similar to these in the ruins about Springerville, New Mexico,

always well repaid the labor of excavation, and he adopted as a working

hypothesis the assumption that these were the burial places of the

village. Whether a similar condition would be found in this region can

only be determined by careful and systematic excavation.

The village did not occupy the whole of the mesa point on which it is

located; on the east the ground rises gently to the foothills of the

Mazatzal range, and on the south and west it slopes sharply down to the

little creek before mentioned; while on the north there is a terrace or

flat open space some 60 feet wide and almost parallel with the longer

axis of the village. This open space and the sharp fall which limits it

on the north is shown on the ground plan. The general view of the same

feature (plate XV) also shows the character of the valley of the East

Verde above the ruin; the stream is here confined within a low walled

canyon. This open space formed a part of the village and doubtless

occupied the same relation to it that interior courts do to other

villages. Its northern or outer edge is a trifle higher than the space

between it and the village proper and is marked by several large

bowlders and a small amount of debris. It is possible that at one time

there was a defensive wall here, although the ground falls so suddenly

that it is almost impossible to climb up to the edge from below without

artificial aid. Defensive walls such as this may have been are very rare

in pueblo architecture, only one instance having been encountered by the

writer in an experience of many years. The map seems to show more local

relief to this terrace than the general view indicates, but it should be

borne in mind that the contour interval is but 2½ feet.

[Illustration: Plate XIX.

SOUTHERN PART OF RUINS OPPOSITE VERDE.]

A comparison of the ground plan of this ruin and those previously

described, together with that of the ruin near the mouth of Fossil creek

(plate XVI), which is typical of this group, shows marked irregularity

in outline and plan. In the character of the debris also this ruin

differs from the Fossil creek ruin and others located near it. As in the

latter, bowlders were used in the wall, but unlike the latter rough

stone predominates. In the character of its masonry this ruin forms an

intermediate or connecting link between the ruins near Limestone creek

and opposite Verde and the class of which the ruin near the mouth of

Fossil creek is typical. In the character of its site it is of the same

class as the Fossil creek ruin, being intermediate between the valley

pueblos, such as that near Limestone creek, and pueblos located on

defensive sites, such as the group opposite Verde. The ground plan

indicates an occupancy extending over a considerable period of time and

terminating at or near the close of the period of aboriginal occupancy

of the valley of Rio Verde.

Another ruin, of a type closely similar, occurs on a bluff near the

mouth of Fossil creek. The plan of this ruin is shown in figure 281. The

village is located close to the edge of the bluff, as shown in the plan,

and has an outlook over a considerable area of bottom land adjoining the

bluff on the east. It is probable that the cavate lodges whose location

some 8 or 10 miles above the ruin, on Fossil creek, is shown on the

general map (plate XI) were appendages of this village.

The wall still standing extends but a few inches above the débris, but

enough remains to mark the principal wall lines, and these are farther

emphasized by the lines of débris. The débris here is remarkably clean

and stands out prominently from the ground surface, instead of being

merged into it as is usually the case. This is shown in the general view

of the ruin. There are twenty-five rooms on the ground plan, and there

is no evidence that any of these attained a greater height than one

story. The population, therefore, could not have been much, if any, in

excess of forty, and as the average family of the Pueblos consists of

five persons, this would make the number of families which found a home

in this village less than ten. Notwithstanding this small population the

ground plan of this village shows clearly a somewhat extended period of

occupancy and a gradual growth in size. The eastern half of the village,

which is located along the edge of the bluff, probably preceded the

western in point of time. It will be noticed that while the wall lines

are seldom continuous for more than three rooms, yet the rooms

themselves are arranged with a certain degree of regularity, in that the

longer axes are usually parallel.

[Illustration: Figure 281.

Ground plan of ruin near the month of Fossil creek.]

The masonry of this village is almost entirely of flat bowlders,

obtained probably from the bed of the creek immediately below. The

terrace on which the village was built, and in fact all the hills about

it are composed of gravel and bowlders, but it would be easier to carry

the bowlders up from the stream bed than to quarry them from the

hillside, and in the former case there would be a better opportunity for

selection. Plate XVI shows the character of the rock employed, and

illustrates the extent to which selection of rock has been carried.

Although the walls are built entirely of river bowlders the masonry

presents almost as good a face as some of the ruins previously described

as built of slabs of limestone, and this is due to careful selection of

the stone employed.

[Illustration: Plate XX.

GENERAL VIEW OF RUIN ON SOUTHERN SIDE OF CLEAR CREEK.]

About half a mile above the mouth of Fossil creek, and on the eastern

side of the river, a deep ravine comes in from the north and east, and

on a low spur near its mouth there is a ruin very similar to the one

just described. It is also about the same size. The general character of

the site it occupies is shown in the sketch, figure 282. The masonry is

of the same general character as that of the ruin near the mouth of

Fossil creek, and the débris, which stands out sharply from the ground

surface, is distinguished by the same cleanness.

[Illustration: Figure 282.

Sketch map, site of ruin above Fossil creek.]

About 8½ miles north of Fossil creek, on the eastern side of the Verde,

occurs a small ruin, somewhat different in the arrangement of rooms from

those described. Here there is a bench or terrace, some 50 feet above

the river, cut through near its northern end by a small canyon. The ruin

is located on the southern side of this terrace, near the mouth of the

creek, and consists of about ten rooms arranged in +L+ shape. The lines

are very irregular, and there are seldom more than three rooms

connected. The débris marking the wall lines is clean, and the lines are

well defined, although no standing wall remains.

About a mile above the last-described ruin, or 9½ miles north of the

mouth of Fossil creek, a small group of ruins occurs. The sketch, figure

283, shows the relation of the parts of this group to one another. The

small cluster or rooms on the south is very similar in character,

location, and size to the ruin last described. The northern portion is

situated on the opposite side of a deep canyon or ravine, on the crown

of a hill composed of limestone, which outcrops everywhere about it, and

is considerably higher than the small cluster on the south. The northern

ruin is of considerable size and very compactly built, the rooms being

clustered about the summit of the hill. The central room, occupying the

crown of the hill, is 20 feet higher than the outside rooms. In a saddle

between the main cluster and a similar hill toward the southeast there

are a number of other rooms, not marked so prominently by débris as

those of the main cluster. There is no standing wall remaining, but the

débris of the main and adjoining clusters indicates that the masonry was

very rough, the walls being composed of slabs of limestone similar to

those found in the large ruin near the mouth of Limestone creek, and

obtained probably not 20 feet away from their present position.

[Illustration: Figure 283.

Sketch map of ruin 9½ miles above Fossil creek.]

The ruin described on page 200 and assigned to the first subclass occurs

about half a mile north of this limestone hill, on the opposite side of

the river. This small ruin, like all the smaller ruins described, was

built of river bowlders, or river bowlders with occasional slabs of

sandstone or limestone, while the ruin last described consists

exclusively of limestone slabs. This difference is explained, however,

by the character of the sites occupied by the several ruins. The

limestone hill upon which the ruin under discussion is situated is an

anomalous feature, and its occurrence here undoubtedly determined the

location of this village. It is difficult otherwise to understand the

location of this cluster of rooms, for they command no outlook over

tillable land, although the view up and down the river is extensive.

This cluster, which is the largest in size for many miles up and down

the river, may have been the parent pueblo, occupying somewhat the same

relation to the smaller villages that Zuñi occupies to the summer

farming settlements of Nutria, Pescado, and Ojo Caliente; and doubtless

the single-room remains, which occur above and below the cluster on mesa

benches and near tillable tracts, were connected with it. This ruin is

an example of the second subclass, or villages located on defensive

sites, which merges into ruins of the first subclass, or villages on

bottom lands, through villages like that located at the mouth of the

East Verde and at the mouth of Fossil creek.

[Illustration: Plate XXI.

DETAILED VIEW OF RUIN ON SOUTHERN SIDE OF CLEAR CREEK.]

On the eastern side of the Verde, just below the mouth of Beaver creek,

opposite and a little above Verde, occurs one of the best examples to be

found in this region of a large village located on a defensive site.

Here there is a group of eight clusters extending half a mile up and

down the river, and some of the clusters have walls still standing to a

height of 8 and 10 feet. The relation of these clusters to each other is

shown in the sketch map, figure 284.

[Illustration: Figure 284.

Sketch map showing location of ruins opposite Verde.]

The principal ruin of the group is situated on the northern side of a

small valley running eastward from the river up to the foot of a

prominent mesa, which here bounds the eastern side of the river bottom.

The valley is perhaps half a mile long and about an eighth of a mile

wide. The ruin is located on a butte or knoll connected with the hills

back of it by a low saddle, forming a sort of promontory or tongue of

land rising from a flat space or bench, the whole some 200 feet above

the river bottom. One of the clusters of rooms is located in the saddle

mentioned and is connected with the main ruin. At the foot of the butte

on the western side there is a similar cluster, not connected, however,

with the main ruin; and south of the main ruin, on the extreme edge of

the little mesa or bench, there is another small cluster. The ruin shown

on the sketch map southwest of the main ruin consists of but two rooms,

with no wall now standing. All these clusters are shown in their proper

position on the ground plan, plate XVII. Plate XVIII, which is a general

view from the east, shows the main ruin on the butte, together with the

connected cluster east of it in the saddle. The modern settlement seen

in the middle distance is Verde.

About a quarter of a mile west of the main ruin there is another small

but well-preserved cluster of rooms. It occupies the narrow ridge of a

hill some 200 feet above the river. On the west and south, the hill

descends abruptly to the river; on the southeast and east it slopes

sharply down to a broad valley on the level of the mesa bench before

mentioned, but the valley is cut by a narrow and deep canyon marking the

east side of the hill. This cluster is shown on the ground plan, plate

XVII, though not in its proper position. Northeast of this cluster and

perhaps 200 yards distant there are traces of other rooms, but they are

so faint that no plan can be made out. As shown on the sketch map,

figure 284, the hill is a long narrow one, and its western side falls

rapidly to a large triangular area of flat bottom land lying between it

and Beaver creek, which it overlooks, as well as a large area of the

valley up the river and all the fine bottom lands north and east of

Verde and on the northwestern side of Beaver creek. As regards outlook,

and also as regards security and facility of defense, the site of the

small cluster is far superior to that of the main cluster of rooms.

About a quarter of a mile south and east of the main ruin, on the

opposite side of the little valley before mentioned, a mesa bench

similar to the one last described occurs; and on a point of this,

extending almost to the river bank, there are traces, now nearly

obliterated, of a small cluster of rooms. A short distance east of this

point there is a large rounded knoll, with a peculiar terrace-like bench

at about half its height. The entire summit of this knoll was occupied

by rooms, of which the walls are much broken and none remain standing.

This knoll, with the ruins on its summit, is shown in plate XIX, which

also gives a general view from the north of the small cluster southeast

of the main ruin. The character of the valley of the Verde at this point

is also shown. The sketch map, figure 284, shows the location of these

ruins in reference to others of the group.

The main cluster, that portion occupying the crown or summit of the

butte before described, exhibits at the present time some fifty rooms in

the ground plan, but there were at one time a larger number than this;

and there is no doubt that rooms extended down the slopes of the hill

southward and southwestward. The plan of this main cluster is peculiar;

it differs from all the smaller surrounding clusters. It tells the story

of a long occupancy by a people who increased largely in numbers, but

who, owing to their hostile environment, could not increase the space

occupied by them in proportion to their numbers. It will be noticed that

while the wall lines are remarkably irregular in arrangement they are

more often continuous than otherwise, more frequently continuous, in

fact, than the lines of some of the smaller villages before described.

The rooms are remarkably small, 10 feet square being a not unusual

measurement, and built so closely together as to leave no space for

interior courts. The typical rooms in the ruins of this region are

oblong, generally about twice as long as broad, measuring approximately

20 by 10 feet.

[Illustration: Plate XXII.

GENERAL VIEW OF RUIN 8 MILES NORTH OF FOSSIL CREEK.]

In the ruin under discussion it seems that each of these oblong rooms

was divided by a transverse partition into two smaller rooms, although

the oblong form is also common. This is noticeable in the southwestern

corner and on the eastern side of the main cluster, in the southwestern

corner and on the northern end of the cluster adjoining on the north,

and in all the smaller clusters. It is probable that the western central

part of the main cluster was the first portion of the group of

structures built, and that subsequently as the demand for accommodation

increased, owing to increase of population, the rooms on the eastern and

southern sides of the main cluster were added, while the rooms of the

older portion were divided.

There is no evidence that any portion of this cluster attained a greater

height than two stories, and only a small number of rooms reached that

height. The small cluster adjoining on the north, and those on the

southeast, southwest, and west, were built later and belong to the last

period of the occupancy of the group. The builders exhibited a decided

predilection for a flat site, as an examination of the sites of the

various room clusters in the ground plan (plate XVII) will show, and

when the sight of the main cluster became so crowded that additional

rooms could be added only by building them on the sloping hillside,

recourse was had to other sites. This tendency is also exhibited in the

cluster adjoining the main cluster on the north, which was probably the

second in point of age. The northern end of this small group of rooms

terminates at the foot of the hill which rises northeastward, while a

series of wall lines extends eastward at an angle with the lines of the

cluster, but along the curve of the hillside.

The small northern cluster was in all probability inhabited by five or

six families only, as contrasted with the main cluster, which had

sixteen or seventeen, while the smaller clusters had each only two or

three families. The strong presumption of the later building and

occupancy of the smaller clusters, previously commented on, is supported

by three other facts of importance, viz, the amount and height of the

standing wall, the character of the sites occupied, and the

extraordinary size of the rooms.

Although as a rule external appearance is an unsatisfactory criterion of

age, still, other things equal, a large amount and good height of

standing wall may be taken to indicate in a general way a more recent

period of occupancy than wall lines much obliterated and merged into the

surrounding ground level. The character of the site occupied is,

however, a very good criterion of age. It was a rule of the ancient

pueblo builder, a rule still adhered to with a certain degree of

persistence, that enlargement of a village for the purpose of obtaining

more space must be by the addition of rooms to those already built, and

not by the construction of detached rooms. So well was this rule

observed that attached rooms were often built on sites not at all

adapted to them, when much better sites were available but a short

distance away; and, although detached rooms were built in certain cases,

there was always a strong reason for such exceptions to the general

rule. At a late period in the history of the Pueblos this rule was not

so much adhered to as before, and detached houses were often built at

such points as the fancy or convenience of the builder might dictate. As

the traditions are broken down the tendency to depart from the old rule

becomes more decided, and at the present day several of the older Pueblo

villages are being gradually abandoned for the more convenient detached

dwellings, while nearly all of them have suffered more or less from this

cause.

The tendency to cluster rooms in one large compact group was undoubtedly

due primarily to hostile pressure from outside, and as this pressure

decreased the inherent inconveniences of the plan would assert

themselves and the rule would be less and less closely adhered to. It

therefore follows that, in the absence of other sufficient cause, the

presence of detached rooms or small clusters may be taken in a general

way to indicate a more recent occupancy than a ground plan of a compact,

closely built village.

The size of rooms is closely connected with the character of the site

occupied. When, owing to hostile pressure, villages were built on sites

difficult of access, and when the rooms were crowded together into

clusters in order to produce an easily defended structure, the rooms

themselves were necessarily small; but when hostile pressure from

surrounding or outside tribes became less pronounced, the

pueblo-builders consulted convenience more, and larger rooms were built.

This has occurred in many of the pueblos and in the ruins, and in a

general way a ruin consisting of large rooms is apt to be more modern

than one consisting of small rooms; and where large and small rooms

occur together there is a fair presumption that the occupancy of the

village extended over a period when hostile pressure was pronounced and

when it became less strong. It has already been shown that, owing to the

social system of the pueblo-builders, there is almost always growth in a

village, although the population may remain stationary in numbers or

even decrease; so that, until a village is abandoned it will follow the

general rule of development sketched above.

Along the southern side of Clear creek, which discharges into the Rio

Verde from the east, about 4 miles below Verde, there is a flat terrace

from 30 to 40 feet above the creek and some 2 or 3 miles in length.

Scattered over almost the whole of this terrace are remains of houses

and horticultural works, which will be described later. Near the western

end of the terrace a low hill with flat top and rounded sides rises, and

on the top of this occurs the ruin whose ground plan is shown in figure

285.

[Illustration: Plate XXIII.

GENERAL VIEW OF RUINS ON AN EMINENCE 14 MILES NORTH OF FOSSIL CREEK.]

This ruin commands an outlook over the whole extent of the terrace and

seems to have been the home pueblo with which were connected the

numerous single houses whose remains cover the terrace. The ground plan

is peculiar. The rooms were arranged in four rows, each row consisting

of a line of single rooms, and the rows were placed approximately at

right angles to one another, forming the four sides of a hollow square.

The rooms are generally oblong, of the usual dimensions, and as a rule

placed with their longer axes in the direction of the row. Several rooms

occur, however, with their longer axes placed across the row.

Thirty-eight rooms can still be traced, and there is no likelihood that

there were ever more than forty, or that any of the rooms attained a

greater height than one story. The population, therefore, was probably

never much in excess of fifty persons, or ten to twelve families.

[Illustration: Figure 285.

Ground plan of ruin on southern side of Clear creek.]

It will be noticed that the wall lines are only approximately

rectangular. The outside dimensions of the village are as follows:

Northeastern side, 203 feet; southwestern, 207 feet; southeastern, 182

feet; and northwestern, 194 feet. The northeastern and southwestern

sides are nearly equal in length, but between the southeastern and the

northwestern sides there is a difference of 12 feet, and this

notwithstanding that the room at the western end of the southeastern row

has been set out 3 feet beyond the wall line of the southwestern side.

This difference is remarkable if, as the ground plan indicates, the

village or the greater part of it was laid out and built up at one time,

and was not the result of slow growth.

As already stated, long occupancy of a village, even without increase of

population, produces a certain effect on the ground plan. This effect,

so strongly marked in all the ruins already described, is conspicuous in

this ruin by its almost entire absence. The ground plan is just such as

would be produced if a small band of pueblo builders, consisting of ten

or twelve related families, should migrate en masse to a site like the

one under discussion and, after occupying that site for a few

years--less than five--should pass on to some other location. Such

migration and abandonment of villages were by no means anomalous; on the

contrary, they constitute one of the most marked and most persistent

phenomena in the history of the pueblo builders. If the general

principles, already laid down, affecting the development and growth of

ground plans of villages are applied to this example, the hypothesis

suggested above--an incoming of people en masse and a very short

occupancy--must be accepted, for no other hypothesis will explain the

regularity of wall lines, the uniformity in size of rooms, and the

absence of attached rooms which do not follow the general plan of the

village. The latter is perhaps the most remarkable feature in the ground

plan of this village. The addition of rooms attached irregularly at

various points of the main cluster, which is necessarily consequent on

long occupancy of a site, even without increase of population, was in

this example just commenced. The result of the same process, continued

over a long period of time, can be seen in the ground plan of any of the

inhabited villages of today and in most of the ruins, while a plan like

that of the ruin under discussion, while not unknown, is rare.

[Illustration: Plate XXIV.

GENERAL VIEW OF NORTHERN END OF A GROUP OF CAVATE LODGES.]

Plate XX, which is a general view of the ruin from the southwest, shows

the character of the site and the general appearance of the debris,

while plate XXI illustrates the character of the masonry. It will be

noticed that the level of the ground inside and outside of the row of

rooms is essentially the same; in other words, there has been no filling

in. It will also be noticed that the amount of debris is small, and that

it consists principally of rounded river bowlders. The masonry was

peculiar, the walls were comparatively thin, and the lower courses were

composed of river bowlders, not dressed or otherwise treated, while the

upper courses, and presumably also the coping stones, were composed of

slabs of sandstone and of a very friable limestone. The latter has

disintegrated very much under atmospheric influences. The white areas

seen in the illustrations are composed of this disintegrated limestone.

The general appearance of the ruin at the present time must not be

accepted as its normal condition. It is probable that the débris has

undergone a process of artificial selection, the flat slabs and most

available stones for building probably having been removed by

neighboring settlers and employed in the construction of stone fences,

which are much used in this region. Even with a fair allowance for such

removal, however, there is no evidence that the rooms were higher than

one story. The quantity of potsherds scattered about the ruins is

noticeably small.

[Illustration: Figure 286.

Ground plan of ruin 8 miles north of Fossil creek.]

About 8 miles north of the mouth of Fossil creek, on the eastern side

of the Verde, there is a ruin which, though very small, is interesting.

At this point there is a long narrow mass of rock, the remains of a

volcanic dike, some 80 or 90 feet long, which at the southern end

overhangs the stream, while the other end is merged into the ground

level. At its southern end the rock is some 50 feet above the water, but

150 feet northward the dike is no longer traceable. A general view of

this dike is given in plate XXII, while the ground plan, figure 286,

shows the character of the site. There were rooms on all that portion of

the dike that stands out prominently from the ground level, and traces

of other rooms can be seen on the ground level adjoining on the north

and in the causeway resulting from the breaking down and disintegration

of the dike. Remains of eight rooms in all can be traced, five of which

were on the summit of the rock. The wall lines on the summit are still

quite distinct and in places fragments of the original walls remain, as

shown on the ground plan. The plan shows typical pueblo rooms of average

size, and the masonry, though rough, is of the same character as that of

other ruins in the vicinity.

Facility of defense undoubtedly had something to do with the choice of

this location, but that it was not the only desideratum consulted is

evident from the occurrence of a large area of fertile bottom land or

flat river terrace immediately adjoining the ruin on the east and

overlooked by it; in fact, the volcanic dike on which the ruin occurs

occupies the western end of a large semicircular area of tillable land,

such as already described. Viewed, however, as a village located with

reference to defense it is the most perfect example--facility of

obtaining water being considered--in this region. It may be used,

therefore, to illustrate an important principle governing the location

of villages of this type.

A study of the ground plan (figure 286) and the general view (plate

XXII) will readily show that while the site and character of this

village are admirably adapted for defense, so well adapted, in fact, as

to suggest that we have here a fortress or purely defensive structure,

still this adaptation arises solely from the selection of a site fitted

by nature for the purpose, or, in other words, from an accident of

environment. There has not been the slightest artificial addition to the

natural advantages of the site.

The statement may seem broad, but it is none the less true, that, so far

as our knowledge extends at the present time, fortresses or other purely

defensive structures form a type which is entirely unknown in the pueblo

region. The reason is simple; military art, as a distinct art, was

developed in a stage of culture higher than that attained by the ancient

pueblo builders. It is true that within the limits of the pueblo region

structures are found which, from their character and the character of

their sites, have been loosely described as fortresses, their describers

losing sight of the fact that the adaptability of these structures to

defense is the result of nature and not of art. Numerous examples are

found where the building of a single short wall would double the

defensive value of a site, but in the experience of the writer the

ancient builders have seldom made even that slight addition to the

natural advantages of the site they occupied.

[Illustration: Plate XXV.

MAP OF GROUP OF CAVATE LODGES IN WHITE CANYON,

3 MILES BELOW CLEAR CREEK, EAST SIDE RIO VERDE.]

The first desideratum in the minds of the old pueblo builders in

choosing the location of their habitations was nearness to some area of

tillable land. This land was generally adjacent to the site of the

village, and was almost invariably overlooked by it. In fact this

requirement was considered of far more importance than adaptability to

defense, for the latter was often sacrificed to the former. A good

example in which both requirements have been fully met is the ruin under

discussion. This, however, is the result of an exceptionally favorable

environment; as a rule the two requirements conflict with each other,

and it is always the latter requirement--adaptability to defense--which

suffers. These statements are true even of the so-called fortresses, of

the cavate lodges, of the cliff ruins, and of many of the large village

ruins scattered over the southwestern portion of the United States. In

the case of the large village ruins, however, there is another feature

of pueblo life which sometimes produces a different result, viz, the use

of outlying single houses or small clusters separated from the main

village and used for temporary abode during the farming season only.

This feature is well developed in some of the modern pueblos,

particularly in Zuñi and Acoma.

The principle illustrated by this ruin is an important one. Among the

ancient pueblo builders there was no military art, or rather the

military art was in its infancy; purely defensive structures, such as

fortresses, were unknown, and the idea of defense never reached any

greater development than the selection of an easily defended site for a

village, and seldom extended to the artificial improvement of the site.

There is another result of this lack of military knowledge not

heretofore alluded to, which will be discussed at length on some other

occasion and can only be mentioned here: this is the aggregation of a

number of small villages or clusters into the large many-storied pueblo

building, such as the modern Zuñi or Taos.

About 14 miles north of the mouth of Fossil creek, on the eastern side

of the river, there is another ruin somewhat resembling the last

described. A large red rock rises at the intersection of two washes,

about a mile back from the river, and on a bench near the summit are the

remains of walls. These are illustrated in plate XXIII. In general

appearance and in character of site this ruin strongly resembles a type

found in the San Juan region. There seem to have been only a few rooms

on the top of the rock, and the prominent wall seen in the illustration

was probably a retaining or filling wall in a cleft of the rock. Such

walls are now used among the Pueblos for the sides of trails, etc. It is

probable that at one time there were a considerable number of rooms on

the rock; the debris on the ground at the base of the rock on the

western side, shown in the illustration, is rather scanty; on the

opposite or eastern side there is more, and it is not improbable there

were rooms on the ground here. It is likely that access was from this

side.

It should be noted that this ruin, which is of a type known as

“fortress” by some writers, is so placed as to command an extensive

outlook over the large valley below and over the two small valleys

above, as well as the considerable area of flat or bottom land formed by

the junction of the small valleys. It is a type of a subordinate

agricultural settlement, and had the defensive motive been entirely

absent from the minds of the builders of this village it would

undoubtedly have been located just where it now is, as this is the best

site for an agricultural settlement for some distance up and down the

river.

[Illustration: Figure 287.

Sketch map of ruins on pinnacle 7 miles north of Fossil creek.]

[Illustration: Figure 288.

Remains of small rooms 7 miles north of Fossil creek.]

Remains of walls somewhat similar to these last described occur on a

butte or pinnacle on the eastern side of the river and about 7 miles

north of the mouth of Fossil creek. From the south this pinnacle is a

most conspicuous landmark, rising as it does some 2,500 feet above the

river within a distance of a quarter of a mile. The upper 50 feet of the

eminence consists of bare red rock split into sharp points and little

pinnacles, as shown in figure 287, which represents only the upper

portion of the butte. The heavy black lines on the sketch map are walls.

Some of these were doubtless mere retaining walls, but others are still

standing to a considerable height, and there is yet much débris on the

slope of the rock forming the eastern side of the butte near its top. It

is doubtful whether these rooms were ever used for habitations, and more

probable that they were used as a shrine or for some analogous purpose.

[Illustration: Plate XXVI.

STRATA OF NORTHERN CANYON WALL.]

Perhaps a quarter of a mile northeastward, in the saddle connecting the

butte with the contiguous hills in that direction, there are remains of

three small rooms, located east of a low swell or ridge. Figure 288

shows the general character of the site, which seems to have been a

favorite type for temporary structures, single-room outlooks, etc. Among

the fragments of pottery picked up here were pieces of polished red ware

of the southern type, and part of the bottom of a large pot of so-called

corrugated ware.

Half a mile northwestward, in a saddle similar to that last described,

and east of the crown of a hill, are the remains of a single room,

nearly square and perhaps 10 feet long. These single rooms and small

cluster remains are unusual in this region, and seem to replace the

bowlder-marked ruins so common south of the East Verde (to be described

more fully later). Although the walls of this single-room structure were

built of river bowlders, they are well marked by débris and are of the

same type as those in the ruins at the mouths of the East Verde and

Fossil creek.

Aboriginal Remains in Verde Valley, Arizona Thirteenth Annual Report of the Bureau of Ethnology to the Secretary of the Smithsonian Institution, 1891-92, Government Printing Office, Washington, 1896, pages 179-262 · 第 14 / 24 题