REPORT ON THE ORGANIZATION OF LABOR

Comrades, the internal civil war is coming to an end. On the western

front, the situation remains undecided. It is possible that the Polish

bourgeoisie will hurl a challenge at its fate.... But even in this

case--we do not seek it--the war will not demand of us that

all-devouring concentration of forces which the simultaneous struggle

on four fronts imposed upon us. The frightful pressure of the war is

becoming weaker. Economic requirements and problems are more and more

coming to the fore. History is bringing us, along the whole line, to

our fundamental problem--the organization of labor on new social

foundations. The organization of labor is in its essence the

organization of the new society: every historical form of society is

in its foundation a form of organization of labor. While every

previous form of society was an organization of labor in the interests

of a minority, which organized its State apparatus for the oppression

of the overwhelming majority of the workers, we are making the first

attempt in world history to organize labor in the interests of the

laboring majority itself. This, however, does not exclude the element

of compulsion in all its forms, both the most gentle and the extremely

severe. The element of State compulsion not only does not disappear

from the historical arena, but on the contrary will still play, for a

considerable period, an extremely prominent part.

As a general rule, man strives to avoid labor. Love for work is not at

all an inborn characteristic: it is created by economic pressure and

social education. One may even say that man is a fairly lazy animal.

It is on this quality, in reality, that is founded to a considerable

extent all human progress; because if man did not strive to expend his

energy economically, did not seek to receive the largest possible

quantity of products in return for a small quantity of energy, there

would have been no technical development or social culture. It would

appear, then, from this point of view that human laziness is a

progressive force, Old Antonio Labriola, the Italian Marxist, even

used to picture the man of the future as a "happy and lazy genius." We

must not, however, draw the conclusion from this that the party and

the trade unions must propagate this quality in their agitation as a

moral duty. No, no! We have sufficient of it as it is. The problem

before the social organization is just to bring "laziness" within a

definite framework, to discipline it, and to pull mankind together

with the help of methods and measures invented by mankind itself.

Dictatorship vs. Democracy (Terrorism and Communism): a reply to Karl Kantsky · 第 47 / 57 题