JANUARY 9, 1922.

I had settled down in my studio, with the desire that overcomes one

after awhile to atone for infidelity. I had firmly resolved never

more to write nor speak, and to cleave only to the one art that is

in my heart. My mind was full of new creative work, dancing figures,

fantasies and portraits, when suddenly I was asked to go to Boston and

address a meeting for Russian relief.

I accepted the offer, not because I presumed that any effort of mine

could help much towards the starving Russian babies, but I wanted to

see Boston.

I had heard of Boston almost more than of any town in the United

States. Henry James whom I’d loved from childhood, had come from there,

and my mother-in-law who used to say to me: “I am not American, I am

Bostonian.” Henry Adams I had known, and Cabot Lodge, the friend of my

father, they too came from there. I had heard of the child who recited

the Lord’s prayer saying: “... Thy kingdom come, Thy will be done, as

it is in Boston,” and so I started off with curiosity, and expectations.

I got there on Friday night just in time to speak at Ford Hall, which

was fitted with a motley crowd (and some Motleys among the crowd, who

had come out of curiosity to see their unknown in-law, and who would

never otherwise have dreamt of going to such a meeting!)

The audience were responsive and sympathetic, but I knew they had to

be cajoled, entertained, amused. I made them laugh. So they stayed and

listened. I made an appeal, and brought in a few hundred dollars.

But I despise the methods that have to be used to induce sympathy

for starving babies. People have to be bribed to give, bribed by the

possibility of amusement--endless vitality is exhausted in organising

balls, theatre performances, concerts, or entertaining lectures that

will draw the otherwise apathetic. I have seen in a little fifth story

room on the East Side, the voluntary efforts of skilled workers, who

are giving up their Saturday afternoons and holidays and giving their

labor free and making garments for the children of Russia from the

lengths of woolen material donated by various mills. There I saw some

of the garment workers who have been so long out on strike, not only

contributing their work, but a dollar a month besides towards the rent

of their premises. These were the “Tailors’ Technical Aid Society” for

Russian children. These were the people whose services brought a lump

to my throat as I watched the zeal and earnestness with which they

worked. Theirs was the real blessedness of giving.

To the people of leisure and means I hate to appeal, telling them my

personal narrative lightly for their entertainment. Even as I did it,

I vowed it should be the last time. On Saturday I was invited to lunch

and speak at the Harvard Liberal Club. I went, thinking it would be

pleasant and liking immature youth, and having thoughts full of the

remote future possibilities of Dick’s education.

As it turned out they were not liberal at all but rather prejudiced,

and I was assailed with economic questions and problems. Very erudite

indeed were these young men. But they seemed to believe in human nature

working only for gain, ignoring completely the existence of enthusiasms

and beliefs, and sacrifices for ideals, which made those skilled

workers, just referred to, work for no gain at all, as they never would

have worked for an employer. I put up the best fight I could, but in

the end, feeling exhausted and battered, I thanked God that I had no

education but at least an open heart.

After lunch Harry Dana rescued me and took me to his aunt’s house

where he lives, and which is called “Longfellow House.” It is of

historic interest as having been the residence of Washington and also

of Longfellow whose grandson Harry Dana is. The house was quaintly

and attractively Georgian and full of dead memories, marble busts and

musty laurel wreaths. We retired to his book lined sanctum and with us

was an Indian, a follower of Gandhi, who was lecturing at Harvard. We

lit a fire and sat before it on the floor while the follower of Gandhi

talked to us of Eastern philosophy and oriental serenity. He was not

calm in spite of all he said about it, but his restlessness was not the

impatient unrest of the West, it had the dignity of the tiger. As he

paced back and forth, talking the while, his talk was full of poetry

and imagery. I realised what had been lacking in the composition of

one’s days: Here there is no poetry (with apologies to Johnny Weaver!).

There is not time, they say, and dreams are not for practical people.

But the follower of Gandhi combined all the practicability and all the

activity, restlessness and humor of the West with the force of Eastern

imagery. They are great artists, the descendants of a great culture.

They, not we, know how to live, and how to love life.

Incidentally I gathered that a hot place to be in, next December, is

India! This Indian revolution interests me very much. I believe that

before long all eyes will be turned on India.

If Gandhi’s methods of passive resistance are successful, and India

is liberated by a comparatively bloodless revolution, it may mark the

epoch of a new era and a new religion.

To-day, the majority of people one meets are expressing the desire

that Jews and Bolsheviks, and Germans, too, should be wiped out.

The Christian peoples whose religion is based on forgiveness, love

and tolerance, have been killing each other mercilessly. It is just

possible that Christianity is over, that it “went out” in blood and

war. Maybe the renaissance of the world will come in the Orient.

Spirit is unquenchable and inextinguishable. When crushed in one

part of the world it will reappear elsewhere. I make no pretense of

prophecy. I only say: Watch India!

I spent the week-end in the family circle and was overwhelmed with

kindness and hospitality. I, who have grown socialistic and Bohemian,

suddenly went back to being a perfect lady, and as a novelty enjoyed

it. What beautiful manners they had, the Bostonians I met, just

naturally beautiful old world manners. They seemed like those well bred

people one knows in Europe who are so absolutely “placés,” so deep

rootedly aristocratic, that they can afford to be tolerant without fear

of losing caste.

I have wondered a good deal about America and Americans during the

year I have spent here. They have amused, surprised and bewildered

me, but it was not until I came to Boston that I felt I was at home.

Even the town is English. There was Beacon Street with its long row of

individual small houses just as in London, and every one had a street

door. I never went into an apartment. Peoples’ rooms seemed to be full

of books instead of American beauty roses. It was in one of these

houses, after luncheon one day, that the women left alone together

discussed the immortality of the soul without any semblance of effort

or affectation.

On Sunday afternoon my host took me to the Public Library as I wanted

to see the Sargent mural paintings. Crowds were pouring in. The reading

rooms were packed full of silent studious figures. People came,

apparently not to look at the Sargent’s and few of them lingered over

the Puvis de Chevannes that lined the staircase walls. They came, as

people long accustomed to their own, and went straight for the reading

rooms. This interested me more even than the paintings I went to see. I

felt that all my expectations of Boston were being fulfilled, as if it

had been staged for me. Boston could not have been more magnificently

Bostonian. Here resplendent in the winter sunlight stood the imposing

Library Building, and people kept pouring into it from every direction.

It seemed emblematical of all that Boston stands for.

I am glad I have been to Boston, it seems to complete one’s great

perplexity concerning the United States. Here is a country that is

composed of such widely different towns as Washington, Philadelphia,

San Francisco, Los Angeles, all as different from one another as they

are different from New York, and as different as New York is from

Boston.

I wonder there is any co-ordination of movement or feeling at all in

such a country. I wonder there is any political unity, any fraternity,

and yet there is more than all that; there exists a national patriotic

spirit.

Well--I have finished wondering, it brings one nowhere, it solves

nothing. I will return where I belong, to the world of line and form,

a world of one’s own imaginings where there are fewer perplexities and

more harmonies.

My American Diary · 第 144 / 147 题