CONCLUSION.

No attempt has been made in this bulletin to deal exhaustively with

the woodlot problem. The desire has been to point the way for the

improvement of the woodlots in Kentucky. Individual cases deserve

specific consideration, and only the main features of the proposition

have been touched upon. The State Forester will cheerfully answer by

mail all questions relating to this subject so far as it is possible to

do so, and will give such personal advice and direction as the time at

his disposal and the circumstances warrant. A list of books, bulletins

and articles treating this subject is appended for those who desire to

go more deeply into the matter than is possible in a publication of

this character. The illustrations are from photographs loaned by the

Forest Service, United States Department of Agriculture.

Akerman, A. Practical protection and improvement of the farm woodlot,

illustrated. (Bailey, L. H. Cyclopedia of American Agriculture, 1907,

v. 2: 330–33.)

Akerman, Alfred. Spring work in the woodlot; planting white pine

seedlings. (New England Farmer, Montpelier, Vt., April 7, 1906, v. 85,

No. 14: 4.)

Akerman, Alfred. Spring work in the woodlot. (New England Farmer,

Montpelier, Vt., April 28, 1906, v. 85, No. 17: 6.)

Akerman, Alfred. Winter work in the woodlot. (New England Farmer,

Montpelier, Vt., March 3, 1906, v. 85, No. 9: 6.)

Akerman, Alfred. Farm forestry. 22 p. Athens. Ga., 1909. (Georgia

Forest Association. Publication.)

Ames, G. W. Practical forestry for farmers. (Society for Protection of

New Hampshire Forests. 7th annual report, 1909, p. 42–6.)

Atkeson, T. C. The farmer’s woodlot. (West Virginia State Board of

Agriculture Report, 1908, p. 97–103.)

Ayres, P. W. The care of the woodlot. (Society for the protection of

New Hampshire Forests. Fourth annual report, 1905–6, p. 50–1.)

Baker, H. P. The farm woodlot in Pennsylvania. (Forest Leaves,

Philadelphia, Pa., Oct. 1908, v. 11: 163–7.)

Baker, J. Fred. The Michigan woodlot. 14 p., illustrated. East Lansing,

Mich., 1912. (Michigan Agricultural Experiment Station. Circular 17.)

Balderson, R. W. The farm woodlot. (Forest Leaves, Philadelphia, Pa.,

April 1905, v. 10: 25.)

Besley, F. W. Woodlot forestry for Maryland farmers. 7 p. Baltimore,

Md. (Maryland State Board of Forestry leaflet No. 5.)

Bogue, E. E. The farm woodlot. (Garfield, C. W. The Michigan forestry

commission and its work, 1905, p. 10–14.)

Bogue, E. E. Woodlot thinning, illustrated. (Forestry and Irrigation,

Aug. 1906, v. 12: 385–8.)

Bradfield, W. Standing timber in woodlots. (National Conservation

Commission. Report, 1909, p. 181–7.)

Bryner, H. E. The improvement of farm woodlots. (Forest Leaves,

Philadelphia, Pa., June 1910, v. 12, No. 9: 133–5.)

Campbell, M. E. The farm woodlot. (Michigan Forestry Commission.

Report, 1905–6, p. 87–90.)

The care of the woodlot. (School World, Farmington, Me., Sept. 1908, p.

21–4.)

The care of the farmers’ woodlot. (Michigan State Board of Agriculture.

Farmers’ Institutes, 1903–4, p. 80–6.)

Clark, Judson F. Defects in the woodlot and how they may be remedied.

(Ontario Agricultural Experiment Union. Twenty-sixth annual report,

1904, p. 63–8.)

Clark, J. F. The farmers’ woodlot, illustrated. (Ontario Forestry

Bureau. Annual report, 1904, p. 51–8.)

Clark, J. F. The propagation of trees by farmers. (Ontario Bureau of

Forestry. Annual report, 1904, p. 334–50.)

Clark, J. F. Woodlot forestry. (Michigan Forestry Commission. Report,

1903–4, p. 47–56.)

Coulter, Stanley. Suggestions for the improvement of Indiana woodlots,

illustrated. (Indiana State Board of Forestry. Twelfth annual report,

1912, p. 85–106.)

Coulter, Stanley. Woodlot conditions and possibilities. (Indiana State

Board of Forestry. Ninth and tenth annual report, 1909: 37–46; 1910:

126–35.)

Davis, C. A. Woodlot studies. 16 p. Ann Arbor, Mich., 1906.

Defebaugh, J. E. Relation of the lumber tariff to the value of farmers’

woodlots. (American Lumberman, Chicago, Feb. 27, 1909, No. 1762: 39–40.)

The farm and the woodlot · 第 9 / 10 题