CHAPTER LXXXI

CABBAGE SOUP

We have been following the fortunes of a pioneer people breaking into

the field of world culture. Let us now travel part way round the earth

in either direction, and watch another pioneer people doing the same

thing.

The differences between America and Russia are many and striking, and

before we enter upon a study of Russian literature we must understand

Russian life. Voltaire tells us that virtue and vice are products like

vinegar, and we shall find this applies also to the Russian soul with

its mysticism and melancholy. When the sun almost disappears for six

months at a time, and icy blizzards rage, human beings have a tendency

to stay by the fire and develop their inner natures; also they develop

congested livers, and brood upon the futility of life.

Says Mrs. Ogi: “Don’t forget that it often gets cold in New England.”

“Yes, and there is both mysticism and melancholy in New England art. But

the difference is that the people of New England escaped from the cradle

of despotism in Asia many centuries earlier than the Russians. So the

brooding of the New England colonist took the form of calling a town

meeting to plan for the building of a new road in the spring. But the

Russian could not do things for himself; he had to get the permission of

officials. If he tried to act for himself, they would strip him and beat

him with knouts until he swooned. So the Russian’s brooding turned to

despair, and he got drunk, and got into a fight and killed his neighbor,

and then tried to make up his mind whether God would forgive him, or

damn him to hell fire forever; he fretted over this problem until he

went insane or wrote a novel--”

“Or both,” says Mrs. Ogi.

The dominant fact in Russian art of the nineteenth century was

despotism. Here was a vast empire of a hundred million people, energetic

and aspiring; and the ruling class dreamed that they could introduce

modern material civilization, while keeping out the modern mind and

soul. Young Russians travelled, and learned to think as the rest of

Europe thought; then they came home, to find that the slightest attempt

to teach or to organize was met by imprisonment, torture, exile, hard

labor, or the scaffold. Wave after wave of rebellion swept Russia, to be

met by wave after wave of repression. Intellectual activity which New

England honored was in Russia a secret and criminal conspiracy; the

youth of the country was broken in a torture chamber; and so we have the

misery and distortion and impotence which we regard as characteristic

Slavic qualities.

The Russian was supposed to be incapable of action, incapable of keeping

an appointment on time, incapable of doing anything but drinking a

hundred cups of tea and shedding tears over the fate of man. But now

comes the revolution, and in a flash we discover that all that was

buncombe. The Russians begin to act precisely like other men; they cease

to get drunk, they learn to keep appointments, they discover a sudden

admiration for those qualities we call Yankee--hustle and efficiency,

the adjusting of one’s desires to what can be immediately accomplished.

The Russian peasant, supposed to be a grown-up and bearded cherub,

lifting his eyes in adoration to his Little Father in the Winter Palace

and his Big Father in Heaven, is discovered to have precisely the same

desires as every other farmer in the world--that is to say, more land,

and fewer tax-collectors.

Russian literature is a great literature, because it voices the hopes

and resolves of a great people groping their way to freedom and

understanding. It is, whether consciously or unconsciously, a literature

of revolt. It is full of ideas, because it has to take the place of the

prohibited subjects, science, politics, economics, and social

psychology. It is desperately serious, because it is produced by people

who are suffering. Some twenty years ago I remember meeting in New York

the adopted son of Maxim Gorki, who was earning his living as a printer

by day and studying our civilization by night. I recall his remark:

“Americans do not know what the intellectual life means.” The young man

had in mind a country where you adopted ideas with the knowledge that

they might cost you your liberty, and even your life. Under such

circumstances you think hard before you come to a decision. A lot of

Americans have had an opportunity to test their ideas that way during

the past ten years, and so they are now taking the intellectual life

seriously, and producing literature in many ways resembling the Russian.

Says Mrs. Ogi: “Sherwood Anderson says it is because he was raised on

cabbage soup.”

“People will read that,” says Ogi, “and think it a flash of humor; very

few will consider seriously the effect of a starvation diet upon the

soul of a sensitive boy. Neither will they stop to think about three

boys sleeping in one bed as a source of abnormal sexual imaginings,

which constitute one of the original elements in Sherwood Anderson’s

books. To me this seems a law: that wherever you have widespread and

long-continued poverty, maintained by policemen’s clubs, there you will

have a literature, extremely painful to its creators, but delightful to

high-brow critics, who will hail it as ‘strong,’ and up to the standard

of the great Russian masters.”

Mammonart: An essay in economic interpretation · 第 81 / 111 章