CHAPTER VII

The Amerindians and Eskimo: the Aborigines of British North America

I have already attempted to describe in the first chapter the ancient

peopling of America from north-eastern Asia, but it might be useful if

I gave here some description of the Eskimo and Amerindian tribes of

the Canadian Dominion at the time of its gradual discovery by

Europeans, especially during the great explorations of the eighteenth

and early nineteenth centuries.

It is evident that the ESKIMO--who are quite distinct from the

Amerindians in physical type, language, customs, and industries--have

been for thousands of years the only inhabitants of Arctic America.

When the Norsemen came to the New World they seem to have met with

Eskimo as far south as New England, but in more recent times the

Eskimo have only been found inhabiting the extreme north and

north-east: in Greenland, on the Labrador coast, on Baffin's Land, and

along the Arctic coast of the North-American continent, between the

Coppermine River and the westernmost extremity of Alaska, as well as

on the opposite islands and promontories of Asia.

Their name for themselves as a people is usually "Innuit" (in

Greenland, "Karalit"). Eskimo is a corruption of _Eskimantsik_, a

northern Algonkin word meaning "eaters of raw flesh". Although their

geographical range extends over a distance of about three thousand

five hundred miles--from north-easternmost Asia to the east coast of

Greenland--the difference in their dialects is little more than that

between French and Italian; whereas the difference between the speech

of one Amerindian tribe and another--even where they belong to the

same language group--is very great--not less than that between German

and Latin, or English and French, or even between Russian and

Hindustani. This fact--of the widespread Eskimo language--makes some

authorities suppose that the presence of the Eskimo in Arctic America

cannot be such a very ancient event as, from other evidence, one might

believe. Perhaps the bold travelling habits of the Eskimo--which makes

them range over vast distances of ice and snow when hunting seals,

walruses, whales, musk ox, or reindeer--enables them to keep in touch

with their far-away relations.

The canoes or _kayaks_ in which they travel (first described by the

Norsemen in the tenth century) are made out of the hide of the seal or

walrus. The leather is stretched over a framework constructed from

driftwood or whales' bones. There is a hole in the middle for the man

or woman to insert their legs. This hole they fill up with their

bodies. If the canoe capsizes, the Eskimo cannot fall out, but bobs up

immediately. He and the canoe are really "one-and-indivisible" when he

is navigating the seas and lakes, plying deftly a large paddle.

In regard to food they were certainly not particular or squeamish.

They loved best of all whales' blubber, or to drink the fishy-tasting

oil from bodies of whales, seals, or walruses. Besides the meat of

Polar bears and of any fur animals they could catch, or the musky beef

of the musk ox, they devoured eagerly sea birds' eggs, Iceland moss,

and even the parasitic insects of their own heads and bodies! Hearne

relates that they will eat with a relish whole handfuls of maggots

that have been produced in meat by the eggs of the bluebottle fly! On

the other hand, they held cannibalism in horror, whereas for two-two's

their Amerindian neighbours on the west and south would eat human

flesh without repugnance.

The Eskimo, though occasionally tall, are as a rule stumpy and

thickset, with very small hands and feet, broad faces, and projecting

cheekbones, a narrow nose without the aquiline bridge of the

Amerindian, slanting narrow eyes, and long heads containing large

well-developed brains. In disposition the Eskimo are nearly always

merry, affectionate to one another, honest, and modest. Modern

travellers in the Arctic regions give them invariably a high

character; but Frobisher, Davis, and the explorers of the sixteenth

and seventeenth centuries accused them of treachery and an inclination

to steal. Iron in any shape or form they could hardly resist taking.

Moreover, if they are the same people as the Skraellings of the Norse

traditions they must have been of a fiercer disposition a thousand

years ago.

The Amerindians who inhabited (more or less) the rest of the Canadian

Dominion, and the whole remainder of the New World, differed in

physical appearance from the Eskimo mainly in being taller and better

proportioned, with shorter and rounder heads, larger, fuller eyes, a

bigger nose, and a handsomer personal appearance. The skin colour, as

a rule, was darker and browner than the greyish- or pinkish-yellow of

the Eskimo.

The various human types that went to form the Amerindian race (beside

the Eskimo element in them) seem to have entered north-west America

from Asia, and first to have peopled the Pacific slopes of the Rocky

Mountains, after which they wandered farther and farther south till

they got into a warmer climate. Then they crossed the Rocky Mountains

and peopled the centre and east of what is now the United States. As

they pushed their way north up the valleys of the great rivers, they

no doubt killed, mingled with, or pushed back the Eskimo. At last

their northernmost extensions reached to the Mackenzie River, the

vicinity of Hudson's Bay, Labrador, and Newfoundland. But in all the

middle, west, and even east of Canada they seem to have been

_relatively recent arrivals_,[1] not to have inhabited the country for

a great many centuries before the white man came, and all their

recorded and legendary movements in North America have been from the

south-west towards the north-east (after they had got across the Rocky

Mountains). The few cultivated plants they had, such as maize (Indian

corn), tobacco, and pumpkins, they brought with them or received from

the south.

[Footnote 1: There may have been an earlier race inhabiting north-east

America which was killed out or driven away by the last Glacial

period.]

The only domestic animal possessed by either Eskimo or Amerindian was

the dog. We are most of us by now familiar with the type of the Eskimo

dog--a large, wolf-like animal with prick ears and a bushy tail curled

over its back. In this carriage of the tail the Eskimo and most other

true dogs differ from wolves, with whom the tail droops between the

hind quarters. But there is a small wild American wolf--the

coyote--which carries its tail more upright, like that of the true

dog; and the coyote seems indeed an intermediate form between the wolf

and the original wild dog. Most of the domestic dogs of the

Amerindians[2] (as distinguished from those of the Eskimo) seem to

have been derived from the coyote or small wolf of central North

America.

[Footnote 2: "The dogs of the Northern Indians are of various sizes

and colours, but all of them have a foxy or wolf-like appearance,

sharp noses, bushy tails, and sharp ears standing erect." (Samuel

Hearne).

Hearne also remarks that the northern Indians had a superstitious

reverence and liking for the wolf. They would frequently go to the

mouth of the burrows where the female wolves lived with their young,

take out the puppies and play with them, and even paint the faces of

the young wolves with vermilion or red ochre.

When first observed by Europeans the unhappy Beothiks (of

Newfoundland) had apparently no domestic dogs, only "tame wolves",

whom they distinguished from the wild wolves by marking their ears.

They were made more angry by the European seamen attacking and killing

the wolves than by anything else they did. Apparently some kind of

alliance had been struck up between the Beothiks--a nation of

hunters--and the wolf packs which followed in their tracks; and the

Newfoundland wolves were on the way to becoming domesticated "dogs".

Later on it was realized that the island _did_ produce a special

breed--the celebrated Newfoundland dog--the original type of which was

much smaller than the modern type, nearly or entirely black in colour,

with a sharper muzzle and less pendulous ears. But its feet were as

strongly webbed and its habits as aquatic as those of the

"Newfoundland" of the modern breed. Some people have noticed the

resemblance between the farmers' dogs in Norway and the Newfoundland

type, and have thought that the latter may not be altogether of wolf

extraction, but be descended from the dogs brought from Norway and

Iceland by the Norse adventurers who visited Newfoundland in the tenth

and eleventh centuries.]

On the Pacific coast there were other types of domestic dog,

resembling greatly breeds that are found in eastern Asia and the

Pacific islands. Some of these were naked, and others grew silky hair,

which was woven by the natives into cloth (see p. 323). The Eskimo dog

almost certainly has been derived from northern Asia, and is closely

related to the well-known Chinese breed--the chow dog--and the

domestic breeds of ancient Europe. Even the commonest type of house

dog in the Roman Empire was very much like an Eskimo or a chow in

appearance. There is a true wild dog, however, in the Yukon province

of the Canadian Dominion and in Alaska--_Canis pambasileus_--a dark,

blackish-brown in colour. This may have been a parent of the Eskimo

dog, but it is also doubtless closely allied to the original (extinct)

wild dog of northern Asia, from which the chow and many other breeds

are directly descended. The Eskimo never under ordinary circumstances

ate their dogs; on the other hand, the Amerindians were fond of dog's

flesh, and in some tribes simply bred dogs for the table.

When Europeans first reached America all these Amerindian tribes, and

also the Eskimo, were still, for all practical purposes, in the Stone

Age. Those who lived in the north had discovered the use of copper and

had shaped for themselves knives and spear blades out of copper, but

not even this metal was in use to any great extent, and for the most

part they relied, down to the end of the eighteenth century, for their

implements and weapons, on polished and sharpened stones, on deer's

antlers, buffalo horns, sticks, sharp shells, beavers' incisor

teeth,[3] the claws or spines of crustaceans, flints, and suchlike

substances--in short, they were leading the same life and using almost

exactly the same tools as the long-since-vanished hunter races of

Europe of five thousand to one hundred thousand years ago--the people

who pursued the mammoth, the bison, the Irish "elk", and the other

great beasts of prehistoric Europe. Indeed, North America represented

to some extent, as late as a hundred years ago, what Europe must have

looked like in the days of palæolithic Man.

[Footnote 3: Of which they made very serviceable chisels.]

* * * * *

The AMERINDIANS of the Canadian Dominion (when the country first

became known to Europeans) belonged to the following groups and

tribes. The order of enumeration begins in the east and proceeds

westwards. I have already mentioned the peculiar _Beothiks_ of

Newfoundland.[4] In Nova Scotia, Prince Edward Island, New Brunswick,

and the Gaspé Peninsula there were the _Mikmak_ Indians belonging to

the widespread ALGONKIN family or stock. West and south of the

Mikmaks, in New Brunswick and along the borders of New England, were

other tribes of the Algonkin group: the Etchemins, Abenakis,

Tarratines, Penobscots, _Mohikans_, and Adirondacks. North of these,

in the eastern part of the Quebec province, on either side of the Gulf

of St. Lawrence, were the _Montagnais_. This name, though it looks

like a French word meaning "mountaineers", was also spellt Montagnet,

and in various other ways, showing that it was originally a native

name, pronounced Montanyé. The Montagnais in various clans extended

northwards across Labrador until they touched the Eskimo, with whom

they constantly fought. The interior of Labrador was inhabited by

another Algonkin tribe, the _Naskwapi_, living in a state of rude

savagery. The _Algonkins_ proper, whose tribe gave their name to the

whole stock because the French first became acquainted with them as a

type, dwelt in the vicinity of Montreal, Lake Ontario, and the valley

of the St. Lawrence. In upper Canada, about the great lakes and the

St. Lawrence valley, were the Chippeways, or _Ojibwés_, and the

Ottawas. West and north of Lake Michigan were the Miamis, the

Potawátomis, and the Fox Indians (the Saks or Sawkis). Between Lake

Winnipeg and Lake Superior were the _Cheyennes_ (Shians); between

North and South Saskatchewan, the _Blackfeet_ or Siksika Indians

(sections of which were also called Bloods, Paigans, Piegans, &c).

North of Lake Winnipeg, as far as Lake Athabaska, and almost from the

Rocky Mountains to the shores of Hudson's Bay, were the widespread

tribe of the _Kris_, or _Knistino_.[5] The Gros Ventres or Big

Bellies--properly called _Atsina_--inhabited the southern part of the

middle west, between the Saskatchewan and the Missouri basins; and the

Monsoni or Maskegon were found in eastern Rupert Land.

[Footnote 4: See also pp. 156, 164, 186, and 199. In this list I have

put in italics the names of the tribes more important in history, and

in capitals the principal group names.]

[Footnote 5: Kinistino, Kiristineaux, Kilistino; called "Crees" or

"Kris" for short.]

All the above-enumerated tribes, except the Beothik indigenes of

Newfoundland, belong to the great and widespread ALGONKIN group.

(Algonkin is a word derived from the "Algommequin" of Champlain.) In

the valley of the St. Lawrence the French first encountered those

Indians whom they called _Huron_. This was a French word meaning

"crested", because these people wore their hair in a great crest over

the top and back of the head, which reminded the French of the

appearance of a wild boar (_Hure_). The real name of the Hurons, who

dwelt at a later date between Lakes Huron, Erie, Ontario, and the

neighbourhood of Montreal, was _Waiandot_ (Wyandot); but they went

under a variety of other names, according to the clans, such as the

Eries and the Atiwándoran or Neutral Nation. They were also called the

"Good" Iroquois, to distinguish them from the six other nations, the

IROQUOIS proper of the French Canadians, who signalized themselves by

fiendish and frightful warfare against the French and the various

tribes of Algonkin Indians. The Hurons and the rest of the six tribes

grouped under the name of IROQUOIS[6] were of the same stock

originally, forming a separate group like that of the Algonkins,

though they are supposed to be related distantly to the Dakota or

Siou. Amongst the "Six Nations" or tribes banded together in warfare

and policy were the celebrated "Mohawks" who dwelt on the southern

borders of the St. Lawrence basin and near Lake Champlain. As the

others of the six nations (including the Senekas and Onondagas)

inhabited the eastern United States, well outside the limits of

Canada, they need not be referred to here.

[Footnote 6: "Iroquois" was a name invented by Champlain (see p. 69).

Apparently this confederation called themselves _Hodenosauni_. The

termination "ois" in all French-American names is pronounced

"wa"--Irokwá.]

Between the South Saskatchewan, the Rocky Mountains, and Lake

Superior, nearly outside the limits of the Canadian Dominion, was the

great DAKOTA, or Siou group,[7] divided into the distinct tribe of

_Assiniboin_ or "Stone" Indians (because they used hot stones in

cooking), the "Crows" or Absaroka, the Hidatsa or Minitari (also

called Big Bellies, like the quite distinct Atsina of the Algonkin

family), the Menómini (the most north-eastern amongst the Siouan

tribes, and the first met with by the British and French Canadians

south-west of Lake Superior), the Winnebagos on the southern borders

of Manitoba, the Yanktons or Yanktonnais, the "_Santi Siou_"

proper--generally calling themselves _Dakota_ or Mdewakanton--and the

"Tétons" along the northern Dakota frontier and into the Rocky

Mountains--also known as _Blackfeet_, Sans Arcs ("without bows"),

"Two-kettles", "Brulés" or "Burnt" Indians, &c.

[Footnote 7: The far-famed term _Siou_ is said to have been an

abbreviation of one of the original French names for this type of

Amerindian, _Nadouessiou_. In early books they are often called the

Nadouessies.]

Next must be mentioned the very important and widespread ATHAPASKAN or

Déné (Tinné) group, named after Lake Athapaska (or Athabaska), because

that sheet of water became a great rallying place for these northern

tribes. The Athapaskan group of Indians indeed represents the

"Northern Indians" of the Hudson's Bay Company's reports and

explorers. They drew a great distinction between the Northern Indians

(the Athapaskan tribes) and the Southern Indians, which included all

the other Amerindian groups dwelling to the south of the Athapaskan

domain. But although nowadays so much associated with the far north

and north-west of America, the Athabaskan group evidently came from a

region much farther south, and has been cut in half by other tribal

movements, wars, and migrations; for the Athapaskan family also

includes the Apaches and the Navaho of the south-western portions of

the United States and the adjoining territories of Mexico. The

northern and southern divisions of the Athapaskan group are separated

by something like twelve hundred miles. The following are the

principal tribes into which the Northern ATHAPASKAN group was divided

at the time of the first explorations of the north-west. There were

the _Chippewayan_ Indians[8] round about Lake Athapaska, and the

Caribou Eaters or Ethen-eldeli between Lake Athapaska and Reindeer

Lake. The "_Slaves_", or Slave Indians of the Great Slave Lake and the

upper Mackenzie River; the Beaver and Sarsi Indians (known also as the

Tsékehn), about the Peace River and the northern part of Alberta

province; and the _Yellow Knives_, or Totsan-ottine (so called from

their being found with light-coloured copper knives when first

discovered by Europeans), north-east of the Great Slave Lake and along

the Coppermine River: the _Dogribs_ between the Great Slave Lake and

Great Bear Lake, perhaps (except in Alaska) the most northern

extension of the Amerindian type towards the Arctic regions. West of

the Dogribs dwelt--and still dwell--the interesting tribe of _Hare_

Indians, or Kawcho-Tinné. They extend northwards to the Anderson

River, on the verge of the Arctic Ocean. West of the lower Mackenzie

River, and stretching thence to the Porcupine or Yukon Rivers, are the

Squinting Indians ("Loucheux", or Kuchin), who in former times were

met with much farther to the south-east than at the present day.

Finally, there are the Nahani Indians, who have penetrated through the

Rocky Mountains to the Stikine River, reaching thus quite close to the

Pacific Ocean. This penetration northwards of groups of Athapaskan

Indians into districts inhabited for the most part by Amerindian

tribes differing widely in language and customs from all those _east_

of the Rocky Mountains, explains the way in which stories of the great

western sea--the Pacific--reached, by means of trading intercourse,

those Amerindian tribes of the middle-west and upper Canada, and so

stirred up the French and English explorers of the seventeenth and

eighteenth centuries to make the marvellous journeys which are

recounted in this book.

[Footnote 8: These northern Indians are described by Hearne as having

very low foreheads, small eyes, high cheekbones, Roman noses, broad

cheeks, and long, broad chins. Their skins were soft, smooth and

polished, somewhat copper-coloured, and inclining towards a dingy

brown. The hair of the head was black, strong, and straight. They were

not in general above middle size, though well proportioned.]

_West_ of the Rocky Mountains, in British Columbia and Vancouver

Island (besides southern Alaska), the Amerindian tribes form the

N[¯u]tka-Columbian group, which is markedly distinct from the

Amerindians _east_ of the Rocky Mountains, from whom they differ

_widely_ in language, type, and culture. They are divided into quite a

large number of small separate groups--the Wakashan or _N[¯u]tkas_ of

Vancouver Island and south-western British Columbia, the Shahaptian or

"Nez percés" Indians of the Columbia basin, and the Chin[¯u]ks of

the lower Columbia River, the _Salishan_ or "Flathead" group

(including the Atn[¯a]s) of the Fraser and Thompson Rivers and central

British Columbia; and the _Haida_ Indians of Queen Charlotte's Islands

and the north-west coast of British Columbia. It must be remembered

that these different groups are only based on the relationships of

their component tribes in language or dialect, and do not always imply

that the tribes belonging to them had the same customs and

dispositions; but they were generally able to communicate with one

another in speech, whereas if they met the Indians of another group

the language might be so totally different that they could only

communicate by means of signs.

[Illustration: AN AMERINDIAN TYPE OF BRITISH COLUMBIA]

Sign and gesture language[9] was extraordinarily developed amongst all

the Amerindian races from the Arctic Ocean to the Antarctic. Not only

that, but they were quick to understand the purpose of pictures. They

could draw maps in the sand to explain the geography of their country,

and Europeans could often make them understand what they required by

rough drawings. They themselves related many events by means of a

picture language--the beginning of hieroglyphics; and in the

south-eastern parts of Canada, as in the United States, these signs or

pictographs were recorded in bead-shell work--the celebrated "wampum".

[Footnote 9: "It is surprising how dexterous all these natives of the

plains are in communicating their ideas by signs. They hold

conferences for several hours, upon different subjects, during the

whole of which time not a single word is pronounced upon either side,

and still they appear to comprehend each other perfectly well. This

mode of communication is natural to them; their gestures are made with

the greatest ease, and they never seem to be at a loss for a sign to

express their meaning" (Alex. Henry the Younger, 1800). But it should

also be noted that during the last hundred years the peoples belonging

to the N[¯u]tka-Columbian group have developed a trade language which

they use in common. This is a mixture of Chin[¯u]k, English, French,

Chinese, and Hawaaian.]

All these tribes, of course, varied very much in personal appearance,

though not in disposition. The vanished Beothiks of Newfoundland are

described as having been a good-looking tall people, with large black

eyes and a skin so light, when washed free from dirt or paint, that

the Portuguese compared them to gipsies; and the writer of Fabian's

_Chronicle_, who saw two of them (brought back by Cabot) at Henry

VII's Court, in 1499, took them for Englishmen when they were dressed

in English clothes. It was these people--subsequently killed out by

the British settlers on Newfoundland--who originated the term "Red

Indians", or, in French, _Peaux Rouges_, because their skins, like

those of so many other Amerindians, were painted with red ochre.

Many of the British Columbian peoples made themselves artificially

ugly by flattening the sides of the head. To press the skull whilst it

was soft, they squeezed the heads of their children between boards;

others, such as the warlike tribes of the upper Missouri, had a

passion for submitting themselves to mutilation by the medicine man of

the clan, in order to please the sun god. Such would submit to large

strips being cut from the flesh of their shoulders, arms, or legs, or

having their cheeks slashed. The result, of course, was to leave their

limbs and features horribly scarred when they healed up. In some

tribes, however, a young man could not obtain--or retain--a wife

unless he had shown his bravery by submitting to this mutilation.

Women often cut off one or more joints of their fingers to show their

grief for the death of children.

In some tribes, especially of the far north-west and of the Rocky

Mountains, the personal habits of men and women, or of the women only,

were so filthy, and their dislike to bathing so pronounced, that they

became objects of loathing to white men; in other tribes personal

cleanliness was highly esteemed, especially on the seacoast of British

Columbia or along the banks of the great rivers. Usually the men were

better looking and better developed than the women--for one reason,

because they were better fed.

Here is a description by PETER GRANT--a pioneer of the North-West

Company--of the Ojibwé Indians dwelling near the east end of Lake

Superior at the beginning of the nineteenth century:--

"Their complexion is a whitish cast of copper colour, their hair

black, long, straight, and of a very strong texture. The young men

allow several locks of the hair to fall down over the face, ornamented

with ribbons, silver brooches, &c. They gather up another lock from

behind the head into a small clump, and wrap it up with very thin

plates of silver, in which they fix the tail feathers of the eagle or

any other favourite bird with the wearing of which they have

distinguished themselves in war. They are very careful with their

hair, anointing it with bears' oil, which gives it a smooth and glossy

appearance. The teeth are of a beautiful ivory white, the cheeks

rather high and prominent, the eyes black and lively. Their

countenances are generally pleasant, and they might often be called

handsome. The ears are pierced in infancy, and the lobe is extended to

an unnatural size by suspending lead or any other heavy metal from the

outer rim, which in time brings them down near the shoulder. The nose

ornaments hang down half an inch, and nearly touch the upper lip.

"The men are bold, manly, and graceful in their gait, always carrying

their bodies erect and easy. On the other hand, the women, by walking

with the toes of their feet turned inwards, have a disagreeable and

lame appearance. The men are specially fond of painting their faces

and bodies with vermilion, white and blue clay, charcoal or soot mixed

with a little grease or water. With this colour they daub the body,

legs, and thighs in bars and patches, and take the greatest pains

about painting the face, usually with red and black. Their skins are

generally tattooed with figures representing the sun, stars, eagles,

serpents, &c, especially objects which have appeared to them in their

dreams. The women's faces are much less painted, usually a spot of red

on each cheek and a circle of red round the roots of the hair or

eyes."

Here is a summary of what Alexander Henry, sen., wrote of the _Kri_ or

_Knistino_ Indians of Lake Athabaska about 1770:--

"The men in general tattoo their bodies and arms very much. The women

confine this ornamentation to the chin, having three perpendicular

lines from the middle of the chin to the lip, and one or more running

on each side, nearly parallel with the corner of the mouth. Their

dress consists of leather; that of the men is a pair of leggings,

reaching up to the hip and fastened to the girdle. Between the legs is

passed a strip of woollen stuff, but when this cannot be procured they

use a piece of dressed leather about nine inches broad and four feet

long, whose ends are drawn through the girdle and hang down before and

behind about a foot.... The shirt is of soft dressed leather, either

from the prong-buck or young red deer, close about the neck and

hanging to the middle of the thigh; the sleeves are of the same, loose

and open under the arms to the elbows, but thence to the wrist sewed

tight. The cap is commonly a piece of leather, or skin with the hair

on, shaped to fit the head, and tied under the chin; the top is

usually decorated with feathers or other ornament. Shoes are made of

buffalo (bison) hide, dressed in the hair, and mittens of the same.

Over the whole a buffalo robe is thrown, which serves as covering day

and night.

"Such is their common dress, but on particular occasions they appear

to greater advantage, having their cap, shirt, leggings, and shoes

perfectly clean and white, trimmed with porcupine quills and other

ingenious work of their women, who are supposed to be the most skilful

hands in the country at decorations of this kind. The women's dress

consists of the same materials as the men's. Their leggings do not

reach above the knee, and are gathered below that joint; their shoes

always lack decoration. The shift or body garment reaches down to the

calf, where it is generally fringed and trimmed with quillwork; the

upper part is fastened over the shoulders by strips of leather; a flap

or cape hangs down about a foot before and behind, and is ornamented

with quillwork and fringe. This covering is quite loose, but tied

around the waist with a belt of stiff parchment fastened on the side,

where also some ornaments are suspended. The sleeves are detached from

the body garment; from the wrist to the elbow they are sewed, but

thence to the shoulder they are open underneath and drawn up to the

neck, where they are fastened across the breast and back.

"Their ornaments are two or three coils of brass wire twisted around

the rim of each ear, in which incisions are made for that purpose;

blue beads, brass rings, quillwork, and fringe occasionally answer.

Vermilion (a red clay) is much used by the women to paint the face.

"Their hair is generally parted on the crown and fastened behind each

ear in large knots, from which are suspended bunches of blue beads or

other ingenious work of their own. The men adjust their hair in

various forms; some have it parted on top and tied in a tail on each

side, while others make one long _queue_ which hangs down behind, and

around which is twisted a strip of otter skin or dressed buffalo

entrails. This tail is frequently increased in thickness and length by

adding false hair, but others allow it to flow loose naturally. Combs

are seldom used by the men, and they never smear the hair with grease,

but red earth is sometimes put upon it. White earth daubed over the

hair generally denotes mourning. The young men sometimes have a bunch

of hair on the crown, about the size of a small teacup, and nearly in

the shape of that vessel upside down, to which they fasten various

ornaments of feathers, quillwork, ermine tails, &c. Red and white

earth and charcoal are much used in their toilets; with the former

they usually daub their robes and other garments, some red and others

white. The women comb their hair and use grease on it."

The Slave Indians (a tribe of the Athapaskan family) tattooed their

cheeks with charcoal inserted under the skin, also daubed their

bodies, robes, and garments profusely with red earth (generally

called, in the text of travellers, vermilion), but they had another

favourite pigment, procured from the regions on the west of the Rocky

Mountains, some kind of graphite, like the lead of lead pencils. With

this they marked their faces in black lead after red earth has been

applied, and thus gave themselves a ghastly and savage appearance.

Their dress consists of a leather shirt trimmed with human hair and

porcupine-quill work, and leggings of leather. Their shoes and caps

were made of bison leather, with the hair outside. Their necklaces

were strings of grizzly-bear claws, and a "buffalo" robe was thrown

over all occasionally. Some of them occasionally had quite light

skins--when free of dirt or paint--and grey eyes, and their hair,

instead of being black, was greyish-brown. These last features (grey

eyes and brown hair) characterized many individuals among the northern

British-Columbian tribes.

The Naskwapis of inland Labrador--allied in speech to the Kris and the

Montagnais, but in blood to the Eskimo--are described as above the

middle size in height, slender, and long-legged, their cheeks being

very prominent, eyes black, nose rather flat, mouth large, lips thick,

teeth white, hair rough and black, and the complexion a yellowish

"frog" colour. They were dressed in elaborate and warm garments made

of reindeer skin. The ordinary covering for the head of the men was

the skin of a bear's head. "Thus accoutred, with the addition of a

bow and quiver, a stone axe, and a bone knife, a Naskwapi man

possessed no small degree of pride and self-importance" (James

M'Kenzie).

The handsomest tribes of Amerindians encountered by the Canadian

pioneers seem to have been the Ojibwés of Lake Superior, the Iroquois

south of the St. Lawrence, and the Mandans of the upper Missouri.

Until well on in the nineteenth century none of the Canadian

Amerindians were particular about wearing clothes if the weather was

hot. The men, especially, were either quite oblivious of what was

seemly in clothing (except perhaps the Iroquois) or thought it

necessary to go naked into battle, or to remove all clothing before

taking part in religious ceremonies.

It is commonly supposed that the Red Man was a rather glum person,

seldom seen to smile and averse to showing any emotion. That is not

the impression one derives from the many pen portraits of Amerindians

in the journals of the great pioneers. Here, on the contrary, you see

the natives laughing, smiling, kissing eagerly their wives and

children after an absence, displaying exuberant and cordial friendship

towards the white man who treated them well, having love quarrels and

fits of raging jealousy, moods of deep remorse after a fight, touching

devotion to their comrades or chiefs, and above all to their children.

They are most emotional, indeed, and, apart from this chapter you will

find frequent descriptions of how they wept at times over the

remembrance of their dead relations and friends.

Hearne remarked, in 1772, that when two parties of Athapaska Indians

met, the ceremonies which passed between them were very formal. They

would advance within twenty or thirty yards of each other, make a full

halt, and then sit or lie down on the ground, not speaking for some

minutes. At length one of them, generally an elderly man, broke

silence by acquainting the other party with every misfortune that had

befallen him and his companions from the last time they had seen or

heard of each other, including all deaths and other calamities which

had happened to any other Indians during the same period. When he

finished, another orator, belonging to the other party, related in

like manner all the bad news that had come to _his_ knowledge. If

these orations contained any news that in the least affected either

party, it would not be long before some of them began to sigh and sob,

and soon after to break out into a loud cry, which was generally

accompanied by most of the grown persons of both sexes; and sometimes

it was common to hear them all--men, women, and children--joining in

one universal howl. When the first transports of grief had subsided,

they advanced by degrees, and both parties mixed with each other, the

men with the men, the women with the women. They then passed round

tobacco pipes very freely, and the conversation became general. They

had now nothing but good news left to tell, and in less than half an

hour probably nothing but smiles and cheerfulness would be seen on

every face.

One direction in which the Amerindians did not shine was in their

treatment of women. This perhaps was worse than in other uncivilized

races. Woman was very badly used, except perhaps for the first year of

courtship and marriage. Courtship began by the young man throwing

sticks at the girl[10] who pleased his fancy, and if she responded he

asked her in marriage. But not long after she had become a mother she

sank into the position of a household drudge and beast of burden. For

example, amongst the Beaver Indians, an Athapaskan tribe of the far

north-west, it is related by Alexander Mackenzie that the women are

permanently crippled and injured in physique by the hardships they

have to undergo. "Having few dogs for transport in that country, the

women alone perform that labour which is allotted to beasts of burden

in other countries. It is not uncommon whilst the men carry nothing

but a gun, that their wives and daughters follow with such weighty

burdens that if they lay them down they cannot replace them; nor will

the men deign to perform the service of hoisting them on to their

backs. So that during their journeys they are frequently obliged to

lean against a tree for a small degree of temporary relief. When they

arrive at the place which their tyrants have chosen for their

encampment, they arrange the tent in a few minutes by forming a curve

of poles meeting at the top and expanding into a circle of twelve or

fifteen feet in diameter at the bottom, covered with dressed skins of

the moose sewn together. During these preparations the men sit down

quietly to the enjoyment of their pipes, if they happen to have any

tobacco."

[Footnote 10: The manner of courtship among the Ojibwés seemed to

Peter Grant not only singular, but rude. "The lover begins his first

addresses by gently pelting his mistress with bits of clay, snowballs,

small sticks, or anything he may happen to have in his hand. If she

returns the compliment, he is encouraged to continue the farce, and

repeat it for a considerable time, after which more direct proposals

of marriage are made by word of mouth."]

Among the Ojibwé and Huron Indians of the Great Lakes the men

sometimes obliged their wives to bring up and nourish young bears

instead of their own children, so that the bears might eventually be

fattened for eating. If food was scarce, the women went without before

even the male slaves of the tribe were unprovided with food. Women

might never eat in the society of males, not even if these males were

slaves or prisoners of war. If food was very scarce, the husband as

likely as not killed and ate a wife; perhaps did this before slaying

and eating a valuable dog. (On the other hand, Mackenzie instances the

case of a woman among the Slave Indians who, in a winter of great

scarcity, managed to kill and devour her husband and several

relations.) So terrible was the ill-treatment of the women in some

tribes that these wretched beings sometimes committed suicide to end

their tortures. Even in this, however, they were not let off lightly,

for the Siou men invented as a tenet of their religion the saying that

"Women who hang themselves are the most miserable of all wretches in

the other world".

On the other hand, the kind treatment of children by fathers as well

as mothers is an "Indian" trait commented on by writer after writer.

Here is a typical description by Alexander Henry the Elder, concerning

the children of the Ojibwé tribe:

"As soon as the boys begin to run about, they are provided with bows

and arrows, and acquire, as it were 'by instinct', an astonishing

dexterity in shooting birds, squirrels, butterflies, &c. Hunting in

miniature may be justly said to comprise the whole of their education

and childish diversion. Such as excel in this kind of exercise are

sure of being particularly distinguished by their parents, and seldom

punished for any misbehaviour, but, on the contrary, indulged in every

degree of excess and caprice. I have often seen grown-up boys of this

description, when punished for some serious fault, strike their father

and spit in his face, calling him 'bad dog', or 'old woman', and,

sometimes, carrying their insolence so far as to threaten to stab or

shoot him, and, what is rather singular, these too-indulgent parents

seem to encourage such unnatural liberties, and even glory in such

conduct from their favourite children. I heard them boast of having

sons who promised at an early age to inherit such bold and independent

sentiments.... Children of nine or ten years of age not only enjoy

the confidence of the men, but are generally considered as companions

and very deliberately join in their conversations."

When death overtook anybody the grief of the female relations was

carried to great excess. They not only cut their hair, cried and

howled, but they would sometimes, with the utmost deliberation,

employ some sharp instrument to separate the nail from the finger and

then force back the flesh beyond the first joint, which they

immediately amputated. "Many of the old women have so often repeated

this ceremony that they have not a complete finger remaining on either

hand" (Mackenzie).

[Illustration: CARIBOU SWIMMING A RIVER]

The Amerindians of North America were religious and superstitious, and

had a firm faith in a world of spiritual agencies within or outside

the material world around us. Most of them believed in the existence

of "fairies",--woodland, earth, mountain, or water spirits--whom they

declared they could see from time to time in human semblance. Or such

spirit or demi-god might assume for a time or permanently the form of

an animal. To all such spirits of earth, air, and water, or to the

sacred animals they inhabited, sacrifices would be offered and prayers

made. Great importance was attributed to dreams and visions. They

accustomed themselves to make long fasts, so that they might become

light-headed and see visions, or hear spirit voices in a trance. To

prepare their minds for this state they would go four or five days

without food, and even abstain from drinking.

Undoubtedly their "medicine men" developed great mesmeric powers, and

this force, combined with rather clumsy juggling and ventriloquism,

enabled them to perform a semblance of "miracles". The Iroquois

offered much opposition to Christianity, thinking it would tame their

warriors too quickly and affect their national independence; but by

the greater part of the Amerindians the message of the Gospel brought

by the French priests was eagerly received, and the converts became

many and most sincere. Their reverence for the missionaries and belief

in them was increased when they saw how effectually they were able to

protect them from too-rapacious white adventurers, fierce soldiers,

and unscrupulous traders.

The Miamis of Lake Michigan held the symbol of the cross in great

respect. A young Frenchman who was trading with them got into a

passion and drew his sword to avenge himself for a theft committed on

his goods. The Miama chieftain, to appease him, showed him the cross,

which was planted in the ground at the end of his lodge, and said to

him: "Behold the tree of the Black Gown; he teaches us to pray and not

to lose our temper,"--of course, referring to the missionary in the

black gown who had been amongst them. Before the cross was planted

here these Miamis kept in their houses one or more bogies, to which

they appealed in times of distress or sickness. One of these was the

skull of the bison with its horns. Another was the skin of the bear

raised on a pole in the middle of the hut and retaining the head,

which was usually painted green. The women sometimes died of terror

from the stories told them by the men about these idols, and the

Jesuits did a great deal of good by getting them abolished in many

places.

The Supreme Being of the Eskimos was a goddess rather than a god: a

mother of all things who lived under the sea. On the other hand, most

of the Amerindian tribes believed in one great God of the Sky--Manito,

as He was called by the peoples of Algonkin stock, Nainubushan by the

Siou and their kindred. This Being was usually kindly disposed towards

man; but they also (in most cases) believed in a _bad_ Manito, who was

responsible for most of the harm in the world. But sometimes the Great

Manito was capricious, or apparently made many mistakes which he had

afterwards to rectify. Thus the Siou tribes of Assiniboia believed

that the Supreme Being (whom they called Eth-tom-é) first created

mankind and all living things, and then, through some oversight or

mistake, caused a great flood to cover the earth's surface. So in a

hurry he was obliged to make a very large canoe of twigs and

branches, and into this he put a pair of every kind of bird and beast,

besides a family of human beings, who were thus saved from drowning,

and began the world afresh when the waters subsided. This legend was

something like the story of Noah's ark, but seems in some form or

another to have existed in the mind of all the North-American peoples

before the arrival of Christian missionaries. Much the same story was

told by the Ojibwés about the Great Hare-God, Nainiboju.

The Siou and the Ojibwé (and other tribes also) believed that after

death the soul lay for a time in a trance, and then found itself

floating towards a River which must be crossed. Beyond the River lay

the Happy Hunting Grounds, the Elysian fields; but to oppose the weary

soul anxious to reach this paradise there ramped on the other side a

huge, flaming-red bison bull, if it had been ordained by the Great

Spirit that the soul's time was not yet come, this red bison pushed it

back, and the soul was obliged to re-enter the body, which then awoke

from its trance or swoon and resumed its worldly activities.

Suicide was regarded as the most heinous of crimes. Any man killing

himself deliberately, fell into the river of the ghost world and was

never heard of again, while women who hanged themselves "were regarded

as the most miserable of all wretches in the other world".

Their belief in spirits--even ancestral spirits--taking up an abode in

the bodies of beasts, birds, or reptiles, or even in plants or stones,

caused them to view with respect of a superstitious kind many natural

objects. Some one thing--a beast, bird, reptile, fish, plant, or

strange stone had been fixed on as the abode of his tutelary spirit by

some father of a family. The family grew into a clan, and the clan to

a tribe, and the object sacred in the eyes of its father and founder

became its "totem", crest, or symbol. As a rule, whatever thing was

the _totem_ of the individual or the clan was held sacred in their

eyes, and, if it was an animal, was not killed, or, if killed, not

eaten. Many of the northern Indians would refrain from killing the

wolf or the glutton, or if they did so, or did it by accident, they

would refuse to skin the animal. The elder people amongst the

Athapaskan Indians, in Hearne's day, would reprove the young folk for

"speaking disrespectfully" of different beasts and birds.

Their ideas of medicine and surgery were much mixed up with a belief

in magic and in the mysterious powers of their "medicine men". This

person, who might be of either sex, certainly knew a few simple

medicines to be made from herbs or decoctions of bark, but for the

most part he attempted to cure the sick or injured by blowing lustily

on the part affected or, more wisely, by massage. A universal cure,

however, for all fevers and mild ailments was sweating. Sweating huts

were built in nearly every settlement. They were covered over in a way

to exclude air as much as possible. The inside was heated with red-hot

stones and glowing embers, on to which from time to time water was

poured to fill the place with steam. The Amerindians not only went

through these Turkish baths to cure small ailments but also with the

idea of clearing the intelligence and as a fitting preliminary to

negotiations--for peace, or alliance, or even for courtship. In many

tribes if a young "brave" arrived with proposals of marriage for a

man's daughter he was invited to enter the sweating house with her

father, and discuss the bargain calmly over perspiration and the

tobacco pipe.

Tobacco smoking indeed was almost a religious ceremony, as well as a

remedy for certain maladies or states of mind. The "pipe of peace" has

become proverbial. Nevertheless tobacco was still unknown in the

eighteenth century to many of the Pacific-coast and far-north-west

tribes, as to the primitive Eskimo. It was not a very old practice in

the Canadian Dominion when Europeans first arrived there, though it

appeared to be one of the most characteristic actions of these

red-skinned savages in the astonished eyes of the first pioneers. They

used pipes for smoking, however, long before tobacco came among them,

certain berries taking the place of tobacco.

The Amerindians of the southern parts of Canada and British Columbia

were more or less settled peoples of towns or villages, of fixed homes

to which they returned at all seasons of the year, however far afield

they might range for warfare, trade, or hunting. But the more northern

tribes were nomads: people shifting their abode from place to place in

pursuit of game or trade. Unlike the people of the south and west

(though these only grew potatoes) they were not agriculturists: the

only vegetable element in their food was the wild rice of the marshes,

the sweet-tasting layer between the bark and the wood of certain

trees, and the fruits or fungi of the forest or the lichen growing on

the rocks. Though these people might in summertime build some hasty

wigwam of boughs and moss, their ordinary dwelling place was a tent.

The Wood Indians, or Opimitish Ininiwak, of the Athapaskan group

(writes Alexander Henry, sen.) had no fixed villages; and their lodges

or huts were so rudely fashioned as to afford them very inadequate

protection against the weather. The greater part of their year was

spent in travelling from place to place in search of food. The animal

on which they chiefly depended was the _hare_--a most prominent animal

in Amerindian economy and tradition. This they took in springes. From

its skin they made coverings with much ingenuity, cutting it into

narrow strips and weaving this into the shape of a blanket, which was

of a very warm and agreeable quality.

The Naskwapi Algonkins of inland Labrador were savages that led a

wandering life through the bare, flat parts of that country,

subsisting chiefly upon flesh, and clothing themselves with the skin

of the caribou, which they caught in pitfalls or shot with the bow

and arrow. "Very few sights, I believe, can be more distressing to the

feelings of humanity than a Labrador savage, surrounded by his wife

and five or six small children, half-famished with cold and hunger in

a hole dug out of the snow and screened from the inclemency of the

weather by the branches of the trees. Their whole furniture is a

kettle hung over the fire, not for the purpose of cooking victuals,

but for melting snow" (James M'Kenzie).

A description of the tents of the Kris or Knistino (Algonkins of the

Athabaska region), written by Alexander Henry, sen., applies with very

little difference to all the other tribes dwelling to the east of the

Rocky Mountains.[11]

[Footnote 11: See also p. 249.]

These tents were of dressed leather, erected with poles, generally

seventeen in number, of which two were tied together about three feet

from the top. The first two poles being erected and set apart at the

base, the others were placed against them in a slanting position,

meeting at the top, so that they all formed nearly a circle, which was

then covered with the leather. This consisted of ten to fifteen

dressed skins of the bison, moose, or red deer, well sewed together

and nicely cut to fit the conical figure of the poles, with an opening

above, to let out smoke and admit the light. From this opening down to

the door the two edges of the tent were brought close together and

well secured with wooden pegs about six inches long, leaving for the

door an oval aperture about two feet wide and three feet high, below

which the edges were secured with similar pegs. This small entrance

did well enough for the natives, who would be brought up to it from

infancy, but a European might be puzzled to get through, as a piece of

hide stretched upon a frame of the same shape as the door, but

somewhat larger, hung outside, and must be first raised by the hand of

the incomer.

Such tents were usually spacious, measuring twenty feet in diameter.

The fire was always made in the centre, around which the occupants

generally placed a range of stones to prevent the ashes from

scattering and to keep the fire compact. New tents were perfectly

white; some of them were painted with red and black figures. These

devices were generally derived from the dreams of the Amerindians,

being some mythical monster or other hideous animal, whose description

had been handed down from their ancestors. A large camp of such tents,

pitched regularly on a level plain, had a fine effect at a distance,

especially when numerous bands of horses were seen feeding in all

directions.

The "lodges" or long houses made of poles, fir branches, moss, &c.,

wherein, among the Iroquois, Algonkin, and Siou peoples, several

families made a common habitation, are described here and there in the

course of the narrative. The houses of the coast tribes of British

Columbia were bigger, more elaborate, and permanent, and in this

region the natives had acquired some idea of carpentry, and had learnt

to make planks of wood by splitting with wedges or hewing with adzes.

One of these British Columbian houses was measured, and found to be

seventy feet long by twenty-five feet wide; the entrance in the gable

end was cut through a plank five and a half feet wide, and nearly

oval. A board suspended on the outside answered for a door; on the

other side of the broad plank was rudely carved a large painted figure

of a man, between whose legs was the passage. But other houses on the

Pacific coast, visited by Cook or Vancouver, are said to have been

large enough to accommodate seven hundred people. These houses of the

Pacific coast region were exceedingly filthy, sturgeon and salmon

being strewn about in every direction. The men inhabiting them were

often disgusting in their behaviour, while the women are declared to

have been "devoid of shame or decency".

According to Mackenzie, such habitations swarmed with fleas, and even

the ground round about them "was alive with this vermin". The

Alexander Henrys, both uncle and nephew, complain of the flea plague

(partly due to the multitude of dogs) in every Indian village or

encampment.

The domestic implements of the Amerindians were few. Pottery seems to

have been unknown amongst the northern tribes to the east and north of

the Mississippi valley, but earthen jars and vessels were made by the

Dakota-Siou group in the valley of the Mississippi. Amongst these

agricultural Indians the hoe was made of a buffalo's blade bone

fastened to a crooked wooden handle. The Ojibwés manufactured chisels

out of beavers' teeth. The Eskimo and some of the neighbouring

Amerindian tribes used oblong "kettles" of stone--simply great blocks

of stone chipped, rubbed, and hollowed out into receptacles, with

handles at both ends. (It is suggested that they borrowed the idea of

these stone vessels for cooking from the early Norse settlers of

Greenland; see p. 18.)

The Amerindians of the regions west of the Rocky Mountains made

kettles or cooking vessels out of blocks of "cedar" (_Juniper_) wood;

east of the Rocky Mountains the birch-bark kettle was universal. Of

course these vessels of wood or bark could not be placed on the fire

or embers to heat or boil the contents, as was possible with the

"kettles" of stone or the cooking pots of clay. So the people using

them heated the water in which the food or the soup was boiled by

making stones red-hot in the fire and then dropping them into the

birch-bark or cedar-wood tubs. Many of the northern Indians got into

the way of eating their food raw because of the difficulty of making a

fire away from home.

In regard to food, neither Amerindian nor Eskimo was squeamish. They

were almost omnivorous, and specially delighted in putrid or noisome

substances from which a European would turn in loathing, and from the

eating of which he might conceivably die.

It was only in the extreme south of Canada or in British Columbia

(potatoes only) that any agriculture was carried on and that the

natives had maize, pumpkins, and pease to add to their dietary; but

(as compared to the temperate regions of Europe and Asia) Nature was

generous in providing wild fruits and grain without trouble of

husbandry. The fruits and nuts have been enumerated elsewhere, but a

description might be given here of the "wild oats" (_Avena fatua_) and

the "wild rice" of the regions of central Canada and the middle west.

The wild oats made a rough kind of porridge, but were not so important

and so nourishing as the wild rice which is so often mentioned in the

stories of the pioneers, who liked this wild grain as much as the

Indians did.

This wild rice (_Zizania aquatica_) grew naturally in small rivers and

swampy places. The stems were hollow, jointed at intervals, and the

grain appeared at the extremity of the stalk. By the month of June

they had grown two feet above the surface of the shallow water, and

were ripe for harvesting in September. At this period the Amerindians

passed in canoes through the water-fields of wild rice, shaking the

ears into the canoes as they swept by. The grain fell out easily when

ripe, but in order to clean it from the husk it was dried over a slow

fire on a wooden grating. After being winnowed it was pounded to flour

in a mortar, or else boiled like rice, and seasoned with fat. "It had

a most delicate taste", wrote Alexander Henry the Elder.

Fish was perhaps the staple of Amerindian diet, because in scarcely

any part of the Canadian Dominion is a lake, river, or brook far away.

In the region of the Great Lakes fish were caught in large quantities

in October, and exposed to the weather to be frozen at nighttime. They

were then stored away in this congealed state, and lasted good--more

or less--till the following April.

Pemmican--that early form of potted meat so familiar to the readers of

Red-Indian romances--was made of the lean meat of the bison. The

strips of meat were dried in the sun, and afterwards pounded in a

mortar and mixed with an equal quantity of bison fat. Fish "pemmican"

was sun-dried fish ground to powder.

A favourite dish among the northern Indians was blood mixed with the

half-digested food found in the stomach of a deer, boiled up with a

sufficient quantity of water to make it of the consistency of pease

porridge. Some scraps of fat or tender flesh were shredded small and

boiled with it. To render this dish more palatable they had a method

of mixing the blood with the contents of the stomach in the paunch

itself, and hanging it up in the heat and smoke of the fire for

several days--in other words, the Scotch haggis. The kidneys of both

moose and buffalo were usually eaten _raw_ by the southern Indians,

for no sooner was one of those beasts killed than the hunter ripped up

its belly, snatched out the kidneys, and ate them warm, before the

animal was quite dead. They also at times put their mouths to the

wound the ball or the arrow had made, and sucked the blood; this, they

said, quenched thirst, and was very nourishing.

The favourite drink of the Ojibwé Indians in the wintertime was hot

broth poured over a dishful of pure snow.

The Amerindians of the Nipigon country (north of Lake Superior) and

the Ojibwés and Kris often relapsed into cannibalism when hard up for

food. Indeed some of them became so addicted to this practice that

they simply went about stalking their fellow Indians with as much

industry as if they were hunting animals. "These prowling ogres caused

such terror that to sight the track of one of them was sufficient to

make twenty families decamp in all the speed of their terror"

(Alexander Henry). It was deemed useless to attempt any resistance

when these monsters were coming to kill and eat. The people would even

make them presents of clothes and provisions to allow them and their

children to live. There were women cannibals as well as men (see p.

171).

As the greater part of their food came from the chase, and their only

articles of commerce likewise, they devoted themselves more entirely

to hunting and fishing than to any other pursuit. The women did most

of the fishing (and all the skin-curing for the fur market and for

their own dress), while the men pursued with weapons the beasts of the

chase, trapped them in pitfalls or snares, or drove them into "pounds"

(excavated enclosures).

Illustrating the wonderful sagacity of the Amerindians as game

trackers, Alexander Henry the Elder tells the following story in the

autumn of 1799:--

"We had not gone far from the house before we fell upon the fresh

tracks of some red deer (wapiti), and soon after discovered the herd

in a thicket of willows and poplars; we both fired, and the deer

disappeared in different directions. We pursued them, but to no

purpose, as the country was unfavourable. We then returned to the spot

where we had fired, as the Indian suspected that we had wounded some

of them. We searched to see if we could find any blood; on my part, I

could find tracks, but no blood. The Indian soon called out, and I

went to him, but could see no blood, nor any sign that an animal had

been wounded. However, he pointed out the track of a large buck among

the many others, and told me that from the manner in which this buck

had started off he was certain the animal had been wounded. As the

ground was beaten in every direction by animals, it was only after a

tedious search that we found where the buck had struck off. But no

blood was seen until, passing through a thicket of willows, he

observed a drop upon a leaf, and next a little more. He then began to

examine more strictly, to find out in what part of the body the

animal had been wounded; and, judging by the height and other signs,

he told me the wound must have been somewhere between the shoulder and

neck. We advanced about a mile, but saw nothing of the deer, and no

more blood. I was for giving up the chase; but he assured me the wound

was mortal, and that if the animal should lie down he could not rise

again. We proceeded two miles farther, when, coming out upon a small

open space, he told me the animal was at no great distance, and very

probably in this meadow. We accordingly advanced a few yards, and

there we found the deer lying at the last gasp. The wound was exactly

as I had been told. The sagacity of the Saulteurs [Ojibwés] in tracing

big wood animals is astonishing. I have frequently witnessed

occurrences of this nature; the bend of a leaf or blade of grass is

enough to show the hunter the direction the game has taken. Their

ability is of equally great service to war parties, when they discover

the footsteps of their enemies."

The Assiniboin Indians (a branch of the Sious) down to about fifty

years ago captured the bison of the plains in hundreds at a time by

driving them into large excavated areas below the level of the ground.

Alexander Henry, jun., gives the following description of this

procedure in 1810:--

"The pounds are of different dimensions, according to the number of

tents in one camp. The common size is from sixty to one hundred paces

or yards in circumference, and about five feet in height. Trees are

cut down, laid upon one another, and interwoven with branches and

green twigs; small openings are left to admit the dogs to feed upon

the carcasses of the (old) bulls, which are generally left as useless.

This enclosure is commonly made between two hummocks, on the declivity

or at the foot of rising ground. The entrance is about ten paces wide,

and always fronts the plains. On each side of this entrance commences

a thick range of fascines, the two ranges spreading asunder as they

extend to the distance of one hundred yards, beyond which openings are

left at intervals; but the fascines soon become more thinly planted,

and continue to spread apart to the right and left until each range

has been extended about three hundred yards from the pound. The labour

is then diminished by only placing at intervals three or four cross

sticks, in imitation of a dog or other animal (sometimes called 'dead

men'); these extend on the plain for about two miles, and double rows

of them are planted in several other directions to a still greater

distance. Young men are usually sent out to collect and bring in the

buffalo--a tedious task, which requires great patience, for the herd

must be started by slow degrees. This is done by setting fire to dung

or grass. Three young men will bring in a herd of several hundred from

a great distance. When the wind is aft it is most favourable, as they

can then direct the buffalo with great ease. Having come in sight of

the ranges, they generally drive the herd faster, until it begins to

enter the ranges, where a swift-footed person has been stationed with

a buffalo robe over his head, to imitate that animal; but sometimes a

horse performs this business. When he sees buffaloes approaching he

moves slowly toward the pound until they appear to follow him; then he

sets off at full speed, imitating a buffalo as well as he can, with

the herd after him. The young men in the rear now discover themselves,

and drive the herd on with all possible speed. There is always a

sentinel on some elevated spot to notify the camp when the buffalo

appear; and this intelligence is no sooner given than every man,

woman, and child runs to the ranges that lead to the pound to prevent

the buffalo from taking a wrong direction. Then they lie down between

the fascines and cross sticks, and, if the buffalo attempt to break

through, the people wave their robes, which causes the herd to keep

on, or turn to the opposite side, where other persons do the same.

When the buffalo have been thus directed to the entrance of the pound,

the Indian who leads them rushes into it and out at the other side,

either by jumping over the enclosure or creeping through an opening

left for that purpose. The buffalo tumble in pell-mell at his heels,

almost exhausted, but keep moving around the enclosure from east to

west, and never in a direction against the sun. What appeared

extraordinary to me on those occasions was that, when word was given

to the camp of the near approach of the buffalo, the dogs would skulk

away from the pound and not approach until the herd entered. Many

buffaloes break their legs and some their necks in jumping into the

pound, as the descent is generally six or eight feet, and stumps are

left standing there. The buffalo being caught, the men assembled at

the enclosure, armed with bows and arrows; every arrow has a

particular mark of the owner, and they are let fly until the whole

herd is killed. Then the men enter the pound, and each claims his own;

but commonly there is what they term the master of the pound, who

divides the animals and gives each tent an equal share, reserving

nothing for himself. But in the end he is always the best provided

for; everyone is obliged to send him a certain portion, as it is in

his tent that the numerous ceremonies relating to the pound are

observed. There the young men are always welcome to feast and smoke,

and no women are allowed to enter, as that tent is set apart for the

affairs of the pound. Horses are sometimes used to collect and bring

in buffalo, but this method is less effectual than the other; besides,

it frightens the herds and soon causes them to withdraw to a great

distance. When horses are used the buffalo are absolutely driven into

the pound, but when the other method is pursued they are in a manner

enticed to their destruction."

A somewhat similar method was adopted by the northern Kris and

Athapascans for the capture of reindeer.

As regards means of transport, the use of dogs as draught animals was

by no means confined to the Eskimo: they were used in wintertime to

draw sledges over the snow or ice by nearly all the northern Indian

tribes, and by the people of the Rocky Mountains and Pacific coast.

After the Amerindians of the prairies and plains received horses

(indirectly through the Spaniards of Mexico)[12] they sometimes

employed the smaller and poorer kind of ponies as pack animals; but

for the most part throughout the summer season of the Canadian

Dominion--from May to October--transport and travel by canoe was the

favourite method.

[Footnote 12: See p. 150.]

There were four very well marked types of canoe or boat in British

North America. There was the already-described Eskimo _kayak_, made of

leather stretched over a framework of wood or bone; the Amerindians of

the Dominion, south of the Eskimo and east of the Rocky Mountains,

used the familiar "birch-bark" canoe;[13] the peoples of the Pacific

coast belt possessed something more like a boat, made out of a

hollowed tree trunk and built up with planks; and the tribes of the

Upper Mississippi used round coracles. Here are descriptions of all

three kinds of Amerindian canoe from the pens of eighteenth-century

pioneers: The birch-bark canoe used on the Great Lakes was about

thirty-three feet long by four and a half feet broad, and formed of

the smooth rind or bark of the birch tree fastened outside a wooden

framework. It was lined with small splints of juniper cedar, and the

vessel was further strengthened with ribs of the same wood, of which

the two ends were fastened to the gunwales. Several bars rather than

seats were laid across the canoe from gunwale to gunwale, the small

roots of the spruce fir afforded the fibre with which the bark was

sewn or stitched, and the gum of the pine tree supplied the place of

tar and oakum. Bark, some spare fibre, and gum were always carried in

each canoe for repairs, which were constantly necessary (one

continually reads in the diaries of the pioneers of "stopping to gum

the canoe"). The canoes were propelled with paddles, and occasionally

a sail.

[Footnote 13: In the far north-west, on the rivers of the Pacific

slope, the natives used spruce-fir bark instead of birch.]

The aborigines of Newfoundland--the Beothiks--are said to have known

the birch-bark canoe, framework canoe, but to have employed

"dug-outs"--hollowed tree trunks. The canoes of the Mandans of the

upper Missouri basin were like coracles, of circular form, made of a

framework of bent willow branches over which was stretched a raw

bison-hide with the hair inside. This was sewn tightly round the

willow rim. In lieu of a paddle they use a pole about five feet long,

split at one end to admit a piece of board about two feet long and

half a foot broad, which was lashed to the pole and so formed a kind

of cross. There was but one for each canoe. The paddler of this

coracle made directly for the opposite shore; every stroke he gave

turned his "dish" almost entirely round; to recover his position and

go on his intended route, he must give a stroke on the other side,

which brought him up again; and so on till he got over, not without

drifting down sometimes nearly a mile.

Alexander Henry, jun., thus describes a canoe of the Clatsop people on

the Lower Columbia (Pacific coast, opposite Vancouver Island): "This

was a war canoe--the first of the kind I had seen. She was about

thirty-six feet long and wide in proportion, the stem rising upright

about six feet, on top of which was a figure of some imaginary monster

of uncouth sculpture, having the head of a carnivorous animal with

large erect ears but no body, clinging by arms and legs to the upper

end of the canoe, and grinning horribly. The ears were painted green,

the other parts red and black. The stern also rose about five feet in

height, but had no figure carved on it. On each side of both stem and

stern broad strips of wood rose about four feet, having holes cut in

them to shoot arrows through. She had a high sprit-sail made of

handkerchiefs and pieces of gunny-cloth or jute, forming irregular

stripes, I am told these Indians commonly have pieces of squared

timber, not unlike a three-inch plank, high and broad, perforated to

shoot arrows through; this is fixed on the bow of the war canoe to

serve as bulwarks in battle."

Canoe voyages were mainly embarked on for trading; but in all

probability before the coming of the European there was little trading

done between one tribe and another, except in the region _west_ of the

Rocky Mountains, in which--especially to the north--the Amerindians

were so different in their habits and customs from those dwelling east

of the mountains as to suggest that they must very occasionally have

been in touch with some world outside America, such as Hawaii,

Kamschatka, or Japan. In these Pacific coastlands they used a white

seashell as a currency and a medium of exchange. So also did the

Iroquois people and the southern Algonkin tribes, in the form of

"wampum". The principal articles of barter were skins of fur animals,

porcupine quills, dogs, slaves, and women.

First Hunting (to supply food), then Trading in the products of the

chase, and lastly War were the main subjects which occupied the

Amerindian's thoughts before the middle of the nineteenth century.

They usually went to war to turn other tribes out of profitable

hunting grounds or productive fisheries; or because they wanted slaves

or more wives; or because a chief or a medicine man had a dream; or

because some other notability felt he had given way too much to tears

over some personal or public sorrow, and must show his manliness by

killing the people of another tribe. In their wars they knew no mercy

when their blood was up, and frequently perpetrated frightful

cruelties for the sheer pleasure of seeing human suffering. Yet these

devilish moods would alternate with fits of sentimentality. A man or a

woman would suddenly take a war prisoner, or a person who was wounded

or half-tortured to death, under their protection, and a short time

afterwards the whole war party would be greeting this rescued wretch

(usually a man--they were far more pitiless towards women) as brother,

son, or friend, and even become quite maudlin over a scratch or a

bruise; whereas an hour or so before they were on the point of

disembowelling, or of driving splinters up the nails and setting them

on fire. In warfare they often gave way to cannibalism.

Though extremely fond of singing--they sang when they were merry; when

they thought they were going to die; when they were victorious in

hunting, love, or war; when they were defeated; when they were

paddling a canoe or sewing a moccasin--they had but a poor range of

musical instruments. Most of the tribes used flutes made out of the

wing bones of cranes or out of reeds, and some had small trumpets of

wood, bark, or buffalo horn. The Pacific coast Indians made gongs or

"xylophones" out of blocks or slabs of resonant wood.

Here is a specimen of Amerindian singing. It is the song which

accompanied the famous Calumet dance in celebration of the peacemaking

qualities of tobacco-smoking. It was taken down by the Jesuit

missionaries in the seventeenth century from the Ilinwa (Illinois)

Algonkin Indians of the middle west, and its notation reminds one of

Japanese music.

[Musical notation and words:

THE CALUMET OR TOBACCO-PIPE DANCE

Ni-na-ha-ni, ni-na-ha-ni, ni-na-ha-ni

na-ni on-go; Ni-na-ha-ni, ni-na-ha-ni,

ni-na-ha-ni ho-ho; ni-na-ha-ni, ni-na-ha-ni,

ni-na-ha-ni, Ka-wa ban-no-ge at-chi-cha

Ko-ge a-ke a-w[¯a]; Ba-no-ge a-chi-cha

sha-go-be hé, hé, hé! Min-tin-go mi-ta-de

pi-ni, pi-ni hé! A-chi-cha lé ma-chi

mi nam ba mik-tan-de, mik-tan-de pi-ni, pini hé!]

Ninahani, &c, ongo; ninahani, &c, hoho; ninahani, &c.

Kawa bannoge atchicha Koge ake aw[¯a];

Banoge atchicha shagobe hé hé hé! Mintingo mitade

Pini pini hé! Atchicha lé machi mi nam ba miktande,

Miktande pini pini hé!

Dancing was little else than posturing and jumping in masks--usually

made to look like the head of a wild beast. But the men were usually

very athletic. Wrestling competitions were almost universal,

especially as a means of winning a wife. The conqueror in a wrestling

match took the wife or wives of the defeated man. Their running powers

for endurance and speed became justly celebrated.

"Their principal and most inveterate game is that of the hoop," writes

Alexander Henry, sen., "which proves as ruinous to them as the platter

does to the Saulteurs (Ojibwé)." This game was played in the following

manner. A hoop was made about two feet in diameter, nearly covered

with dressed leather, and trimmed with quillwork, feathers, bits of

metal, and other trinkets, on which were certain particular marks. Two

persons played at the same time, by rolling the hoop and accompanying

it, one on each side; when it was about to fall, each gently threw one

arrow in such a manner that the hoop might fall upon it, and according

to that mark on the hoop which rested on the arrows they reckoned the

game. They also played another game by holding some article in one

hand, or putting it into one of two shoes, the other hand or shoe

being empty. They had another game which required forty to fifty small

sticks, as thick as a goose quill and about a foot long; these were

all shuffled together and then divided into two bunches, and according

to the even or odd numbers of sticks in the bunch chosen, the players

lost or won.

A favourite game amongst the Ojibwé is described as "the hurdle",

which is another name for the Canadian national game of La Crosse.

When about to play, the men, of all ages, would strip themselves

almost naked, but dress their hair in great style, put ornaments on

their arms, and belts round their waists, and paint their faces and

bodies in the most elaborate style. Each man was provided with "a

hurdle", an instrument made of a small stick of wood about three feet

long, bent at the end to a small circle, in which a loose piece of

network is fixed, forming a cavity big enough to receive a leather

ball about the size of a man's fist. Everything being prepared, a

level plain about half a mile long was chosen, with proper barriers or

goals at each end. Having previously formed into two equal parts, they

assembled in the very middle of the field, and the game began by

throwing up the ball perpendicularly in the air, when instantly both

parties (writes an eyewitness) "formed a singular group of naked men,

painted in different colours and in the most comical attitudes

imaginable, holding their rackets elevated in the air to catch the

ball". Whoever was so fortunate as to catch it in his net ran with it

to the barrier with all his might, supported by his party; whilst the

opponents were pursuing and endeavouring to knock the ball out of the

net. He who succeeded in doing so ran in the same manner towards the

opposite barrier, and was, of course, pursued in his turn. If in

danger of being overtaken, he might throw it with his hurdle towards

any of his associates who happened to be nearer the barrier than

himself. They had a particular knack of throwing it a great distance

in this manner, so that the best runners had not always the advantage;

and, by a peculiar way of working their hands and arms while running,

the ball never dropped out of their "hurdle".

"The best of three heats wins the game, and, besides the honour

acquired on such occasions, a considerable prize is adjudged to the

victors. The vanquished, however, generally challenge their

adversaries to renew the game the next day, which is seldom refused.

The game then becomes more important, as the honour of the whole

village is at stake, and it is carried on with redoubled impetuosity,

every object which might impede them in their career is knocked down

and trodden under foot without mercy, and before the game is decided,

it is a common thing to see numbers sprawling on the ground with

wounded legs and broken heads, yet this never creates any disputes or

ill-will after the play is decided" (Alexander Henry, sen.).

It has been computed that in the middle of the eighteenth century the

Amerindian population of the vast territories now known as the

Dominion of Canada numbered about 300,000. It now stands at an

approximate 110,000. The chief diminution has taken place in

Newfoundland, Lower and Upper Canada, New Brunswick, Assiniboia, and

British Columbia. There may even have been an increase in the north

and north-west. The first great blow to the Amerindians of these

regions was the smallpox epidemic of 1780. The next was the effect of

the strong drink[14] introduced by the agents of the Hudson's Bay and,

still more, the two North-west Companies. Phthisis or pulmonary

consumption also seems to have been introduced from Europe (though

Hearne thought that the Northern Indians had it before the white man

came). In fact, before the European invaded America neither Eskimo nor

Amerindian seem to have had many diseases. They suffered from ulcers,

scurvy, digestive troubles, rheumatism, headache, bronchitis, and

heart complaints, but from few, if any, "germ" diseases.

[Footnote 14: Before the white man came to _North_ America the natives

had no form of intoxicating drink.]

Some of the agents of the North-west Company apologize in their

writings for the amount of rum that was circulated among the

Amerindians at the orders of that company to stimulate trade, by

saying that it was seven parts water. Nevertheless it excited them to

madness, as the following extracts show. These are mostly taken from

the journals of Alexander Henry the Younger, but they are typical of

what was recorded by many other writers who describe the far interior

of British North America between 1775 and 1835.

"To see a house full of drunken Indians, consisting of men, women, and

children, is a most unpleasant sight; for, in that condition, they

often wrangle, pull each other by the hair, and fight. At times, ten

or twelve of both sexes may be seen fighting each other promiscuously,

until at last they all fall on the floor, one upon another, some

spilling rum out of a small kettle or dish which they hold in their

hands, while others are throwing up what they have just drunk. To

add to this uproar, a number of children, some on their mothers'

shoulders, and others running about and taking hold of their clothes,

are constantly bawling, the elder ones, through fear that their

parents may be stabbed, or that some other misfortune may befal them

in the fray. These shrieks of the children form a very unpleasant

chorus to the brutal noise kept up by their drunken parents."

* * * * *

"In a drinking match at the Hills yesterday, Gros Bras (Thick Arms) in

a fit of jealousy stabbed Aupusoi to death with a hand-dague (dagger);

the first stroke opened his left side, the second his belly, and the

third his breast; he never stirred, although he had a knife in his

belt, and died instantly. Soon after this Aupusoi's brother, a boy

about ten years of age, took the deceased's gun, loaded it with two

balls, and approached Gros Bras's tent. Putting the muzzle of the gun

through the door the boy fired the two balls into his breast and

killed him dead, just as he was reproaching his wife for her affection

for Aupusoi, and boasting of the revenge he had taken. The little

fellow ran into the woods and hid. Little Shell (Petite Coquille)

found the old woman, Aupusoi's mother, in her tent; he instantly

stabbed her. Ondainoiache then came in, took the knife, and gave her a

second stab. Little Shell, in his turn taking the knife, gave a third

blow. In this manner did these two rascals continue to murder the old

woman, as long as there was any life in her. The boy escaped into

Langlois' house, and was kept hid until they were all sober. Next

morning a hole was dug in the ground, and all three were buried

together. This affair kept the Indians from hunting, as Gros Bras was

nearly related to the principal hunters."

* * * * *

"Grand' Gueule stabbed Perdrix Blanche with a knife in six places.

Perdrix Blanche fighting with his wife, fell in the fire and almost

roasted, but had strength enough left notwithstanding his wounds to

bite her nose off."

* * * * *

"In the first drinking match a murder was committed in an Assiniboine

tent, but fortunately it was done by an Ojibwé. L'Hiver stabbed

Mishewashence to the heart three times, and killed him instantly. The

wife and children cried out, and some of my people ran to the tent

just as L'Hiver came out with the bloody knife in his hand, expecting

we would lay hold of him. The first person he met was William Henry,

whom he attempted to stab in the breast; but Henry avoided the stroke,

and returned the compliment with a blow of his cudgel on the fellow's

head. This staggered him; but instantly recovering he made another

attempt to stab Henry. Foiled in this design, and observing several

coming out of the fort, he took to his heels and ran into the woods

like a deer. I chased him with some of my people, but he was too fleet

for us. We buried the murdered man, who left a widow and five

helpless orphans, having no relations on this river. The behaviour of

two of the youngest was really piteous while we were burying the body;

they called upon their deceased father not to leave them, but to

return to the tent, and tried to prevent the men from covering the

corpse with earth, screaming in a terrible manner; the mother was

obliged to take them away."

* * * * *

"Men and women have been drinking a match for three days and nights,

during which it has been drink, fight--drink, fight--drink, and fight

again--guns, axes, and knives being their weapons--very disagreeable."

* * * * *

"Mithanasconce was so troublesome (in drink) that we were obliged to

tie him with ropes to prevent his doing mischief. He was stabbed in

the back in three different places about a month ago. His wounds were

still open, and had an ugly appearance; in his struggling to get loose

they burst out afresh and bled a great deal. We had much trouble to

stop the blood, as the fellow was insensible to pain or danger; his

only aim was to bite us. We had some narrow escapes, until we secured

his mouth, and then he fell asleep."

* * * * *

"Some Red Lake Indians having traded here for liquor which they took

to their camp, quarrelled amongst themselves. One jumped on another

and bit his nose off. It was some time before the piece could be

found; but, at last, by tumbling and tossing the straw about, it was

recovered, stuck on, and bandaged, as best the drunken people could,

in hopes it would grow again" (Alexander Henry, jun.).

* * * * *

As regards drunkenness, several authors among the early explorers

declared that the French Canadian voyageurs were more disagreeable

when drunk even than the Amerindians, for their quarrels were noisier

and more deadly. "Indeed I had rather have fifty drunken Indians in

the fort than sixty-five drunken Canadians", writes Alexander Henry in

1810. And yet the extracts I have given from his journal show that it

would be hard to beat the Amerindians for disagreeable ferocity when

intoxicated.

Henry, summing up his experiences before leaving for the Pacific coast

in 1811, writes these remarks in his diary:--

"What a different set of people they would be, were there not a drop

of liquor in the country! If a murder is committed among the Saulteurs

(Ojibwés), it is always in a drinking match. We may truly say that

liquor is the root of all evil in the north-west. Great bawling and

lamentation went on, and I was troubled most of the night for liquor

to wash away grief."

As a rule, the treatment of the Amerindians by the British and French

settlers was good, except the thrusting of alcohol on them. But in

Newfoundland a great crime was perpetrated. Between the middle of the

seventeenth and the beginning of the nineteenth centuries the British

fishermen and settlers on the coasts of Newfoundland had _destroyed_

the native population of Beothik Indians.

Before the English arrived on the coasts of Newfoundland the Beothiks

lived an ideal life for savages. They were well clothed with beasts'

skins, and in the winter these were supplemented by heavy fur robes.

Countless herds of reindeer roamed through the interior, passing from

north to south in the autumn and returning in the spring. Vast flocks

of willow grouse (like ptarmigan) were everywhere to be met with; the

many lakes were covered with geese, swans, and ducks. The woods were

full of pigeons; the salmon swarmed up the rivers to breed; the sea

round the coasts was--except in the wintertime--the richest fishery in

the world. They caught lobsters in the rock pools, and speared or

clubbed seals and great walruses for their flesh and oil. An

occasional whale provided them with oil, blubber, and meat. The Great

Auk--which could not fly--swarmed in millions on the cliffs and

islets. So abundant was this bird, and so fat, that its body was

sometimes used as fuel, or as a lamp. In the summertime their fish and

flesh diet could be varied by the innumerable berries growing

wild--strawberries, raspberries, currants, cranberries, and

whortleberries. The _capillaire_ plant yielded a lusciously sweet,

sugary substance.[15]

[Footnote 15: This was the Moxie plum or creeping snowberry

(_Chiogenes hispidula_).]

[Illustration: GREAT AUKS, GANNETS, PUFFINS, AND GUILLEMOTS]

The Beothiks were a tall, good-looking people, with large black eyes

and a light-coloured skin. The early French and Biscayan seamen, who

resorted to the coasts of Newfoundland for the whale fisheries,

reported these "Red Indians" to be "an ingenious and tractable people,

if well used, who were ready to help the white men with great labour

and patience in the killing, cutting-up, and boiling of whales, and

the making of train oil, without other expectation of reward than a

little bread or some such small hire".

Yet from the beginning of the seventeenth century the Beothiks--then

about four thousand in number--were ill-treated by the European

fishermen who frequented the Newfoundland coasts. They soon greatly

decreased in numbers, and became very shy of white men. The French,

when they occupied the south coast of Newfoundland, brought over

Mikmak Indians to chase and kill the Beothiks or "Red" Indians. The

Eskimo attacked them from Labrador. Finally, when Newfoundland became

British in the eighteenth century, the English fishermen settlers and

fur hunters attacked and slew the harmless Beothiks with a wanton

ferocity (described by horror-struck officers of the British navy)

which is as bad as anything attributed to the Spaniards in Cuba and

Hispaniola. By about 1830 they were all extinct. As late as 1823 the

following anecdote is recorded of two English settlers whose names are

hidden behind the initials C and A. "When near Badger Bay they fell in

with an Indian man and woman, who approached, apparently soliciting

food. The man was first killed, and the woman, who was afterwards

found to be his daughter, in despair remained calmly to be fired at,

when she was also shot through the chest and immediately expired. This

was told Mr. Cormack by the man who did the deed." Even English women

in the late eighteenth century were celebrated for their skill "in

shooting Red Indians and seals".

"For a period of nearly two hundred years this barbarity had

continued, and it was considered meritorious to shoot a Red Indian.

'To go to look for Indians' came to be as much a phrase as to look for

partridges (ptarmigan). They were harassed from post to post, from

island to island; their hunting and fishing stations were

unscrupulously seized by the invading English. They were shot down

without the least provocation, or captured to be exposed as

curiosities to the rabble at the fairs of the western towns of

Christian England at twopence a piece."[16]

[Footnote 16: These are the remarks of an English chaplain in the

island, quoted by the Rev. George Patterson, who contributed a most

interesting article on the vanished Beothiks of Newfoundland to the

Royal Society of Canada in 1891.]

Too late--when the worry and anxiety of the Napoleonic wars were

over--the British Government sent a commission of naval officers to

enquire into the treatment of the Beothiks by the settlers. One woman

alone remained, as a frightened semi-captive, to be consoled and

soothed. There are Indians in the south of Newfoundland at the present

day, but they are Mikmaks who come over from the adjoining regions of

Cape Breton and Nova Scotia. So tender, indeed, is the modern

government of the island towards these (out of compunction for the

past) that they are allowed to kill the reindeer and other wild

animals without the licence which is exacted from white people, and so

are actually injuring Newfoundland's resources!

Since the great Dominion of Canada was brought into existence in 1871

as a unified, responsible government, the treatment of the remaining

Amerindian natives of British North America has been admirable; and

splendid work has been done in reclaiming them to a wholesome

civilization by the Moravian, Roman Catholic, and Church of England

missionaries.

Pioneers in Canada · 第 7 / 12 章