See Serapion (De Simpl. 260); Avicenna (ii, 2, 95); and Ebn Baithar

(ii, 183.) Avicenna describes it as being an Indian medicine possessing

virtues resembling those of beer. He says it is hot in the second degree,

and dry in the first; is attenuant, proves serviceable in pains of

the joints and in gout; is aphrodisiacal and alexipharmic. (ii, 295.)

Serapion calls it a species of satyrion (orchis?). He calls it an Indian

medicine, little used in his country. He says it resembles hermodactyls

in the cure of arthritic diseases or of gout, and that it engenders

semen, but hurts the testicles. Its bad effects are best corrected by

mustard; its dose two drachms. Ebn Baithar, in this instance, supplies

no additional information. After what we have stated of it, we need have

no hesitation in agreeing with Sprengel that it is the _orchis morio_,

or at all events some species of that genus. As Serapion does not quote

any Greek authorities under this head, it may be inferred that he held

it to be distinct from the _orchis_ of Dioscorides and his followers.

Several species of this genus are still used in India as medicines. The

famous _salep_ is procured principally from the _O. mascula_. See Royle,

Lindley, and Pereira.

_Mial_, or _Storax humida_.

The liquid Storax is described distinctly by Avicenna, who states that

one species of it exudes from the tree and the other is got by boiling;

that the former is of a lighter colour and is highly valuable, whereas

the other is darker and is less esteemed. Some, he says, held it to

be beneficial in cerebral diseases, but this opinion he rejects, as

it induces vertigo. See under _Storax_. He quotes only from Arabian

authorities. (ii, 2, 423, 615.) Both kinds of storax are treated of

largely by Serapion. (De Simpl. 46), and are noticed by Rhases. (Contin.

l. ult. i, 687.)

It is still disputed what tree it is which produces the Liquid Storax.

According to Sprengel and most modern authorities, until of late, it was

held to be the _Altingia excelsa_. Dr. Pereira, however, shows that this

is a doubtful point, and mentions that Dr. Lindley holds that the liquid

storax of the shops is produced by the _liquid ambar orientale_. But in

his recent publication on the ‘Vegetable Kingdom,’ Dr. Lindley says,

“Liquid storax is thought to be yielded by the Dammar pine.” (p. 229.)

Landerer has recently shown that it is obtained from Storax officinale.

(Pereira, Mat. Med. 1325, 2d ed.)

_Kadi._

It is described by Serapion as being a plant which grows in Arabia, from

which the aromatic oil of Kadi is formed. He gives a curious description

of it, but does not mention any medicinal purposes to which it was

applied. (De Simpl. 40.) It would appear that it is also described by Ebn

Baithar (i, 337.) He describes it as being a species of palm, which it

resembles in all respects, and says that a fragrant oil is prepared from

it. Its country is Arabia. He quotes on it Rhases, in his ‘Continens’ and

‘Treatise on Smallpox,’ but we have been unable to discover the passages

which he refers to. His authorities describe, in glowing colours, the

virtues of this substance, and more especially of its wine, in smallpox.

What species of palm it was we are unable to say decidedly.

_Meizaragi._

Serapion gives a full account of it upon the authority of Abugerit and

Abir, who agree in recommending it in arthritic diseases. They give

minute directions for using it in electuaries, pills, and decoctions.

Its dose with sugar is one drachm. They mention that, when put into

rivers, it intoxicates fish. (De Simpl. 365.) Avicenna describes the

_Mehezeheregi_, as being a tree like esula (_spurge?_); and says it is

hot and dry in the third degree, and intoxicates fish when thrown into a

river. He adds, that it is carminative and phlegmagogue, and is useful in

gout, sciatica, and arthritis. (ii, 2, 480.)

We need have no hesitation in agreeing with the best authorities, that

it is cocculus indicus, or the seed of _Menispermum cocculus_ L., i. q.,

_Anamirta cocculus_ of Lindley. (See Veg. Kingd. 309.) He says of it,

that it contains a most venomous principle, the picrotoxine, and that in

its pericarp is found the not less formidable alcaloid menispermine. See

also Gray (Pharmacop. 119), and Ainslie (Mat. Ind. ii, 132.) Both these

authors mention of it, that it is used to intoxicate fish. See, further,

an excellent account of the cocculus indicus in Pereira (M. M. 1326.) It

was used by the Hindoo physicians for the cure of nervous diseases. See

Wise (System of Hindoo Med. 557.) Dr. Royle is somewhat doubtful whether

the cocculus was known to the Arabian physicians, but upon the whole

inclines to this opinion. (Mat. Med. 249.)

_Nux Vomica._

We have briefly treated of the _Nux Vomica_ as a poison in another

place (Vol. II, 241.) We have now to say of it, that it was also used

medicinally as an emetic. For example, Haly Abbas treats of it in his

chapter on Medicines which procure Vomiting. (Pract. ii, 65; see also

Pract. x, 12.) Serapion, in like manner, treats of it in his chapter on

Emetic Medicines. (vii, 36.) Thus he gives the following formula for

an emetic: “℞. Concarned (cardamomi?), nucis vomicæ, seminis raphani,

omnium ān ʒ j. Terantur et dentur in potu cum aqua mellis et decoctione

anethi.” Serapion treats of it also in his work ‘On Simples,’ where he

states, that “easy vomiting” may be induced by administering it agreeably

to the formula which we have just quoted from his other work. He adds,

that perhaps it will also loosen the bowels. Abram, another of his

authorities, likewise says, that given to the amount of two drachms, with

two drachms of dill or of fennel seed, and drunk with warm water, it will

produce vomiting and loosen the bowels. (De. Simpl. 163.) Ebn Baithar’s

authorities give an interesting account of the _Nux Vomica_, from which

it is clear that it was frequently used as an emetic, along with fennel,

natron, mustard, &c. in hydromel.

Dr. Pereira, upon the authority of Dale (Pharmacol.), decides that the

Strychnos Ignatia was the nux vomica of Serapion. But, notwithstanding

our great respect for his opinions, we cannot agree with him in the

present instance. For, considering how common the nux vomica is in Persia

(Ainslie, Mat. Ind.), there is a strong presumption that the Arabians

cannot have been unacquainted with it, and it is not pretended that the

nux vomica is treated of by them by any other name unless it were the

_methel_, which we will presently show it not to be, nor is it attempted

to be shown when and how the misapplication of the term originated.

See, however, in support of Dr. Pereira’s views, Parkinson (Theatre of

Plants, 1601.) It is also proper to mention, that the learned Geoffroy

calls the Faba sancti Ignatii the _nux vomica legitima_. But as it is

admitted by the best authorities on toxicology, that St. Ignatius bean

is much more energetic in its action than nux vomica (see Christison,

644, and Orfila, ii, 276), there is still less probability of its having

been used medicinally than the other. See further in support of the

views we are advocating, Sprengel (R. H. H. i, 250.) We may mention also

in conclusion, that the nux vomica was used as an emetic by the Hindoo

physicians, more especially in the case of poisoning. See Wise (Hindoo

Med. 402.)

_Nux Methel._

We have briefly alluded to this substance (_Datura Methel_) as a poison

elsewhere. (Vol. II, 241.) Serapion, quoting from Arabian authorities,

compares its nut to the nux vomica, and its seed to that of mandragora:

its bark, he adds, is rough, its taste pleasant and unctuous, and its

virtues cold in the fourth degree; if given in a small dose (_kirat_ or

_siliqua_?) it intoxicates strongly, and if two drachms are given it

proves fatal at once. Rhases, as quoted by him, says it is a narcotic,

a sedative, and perhaps emetic medicine, and that it proves fatal in

large doses, and in small intoxicates. He directs its pernicious effects

to be counteracted by taking warm butter, and thus producing vomiting,

and otherwise treating the case in the same manner as in poisoning by

mandragora. (De Simpl. 375.) Rhases, in his work entitled ‘Ad Mansor.,’

says of the nut methel, that it is a dangerous medicine, which induces

stupor, nausea, vomiting, and inebriety. (iii, 30.) His account of it

in his ‘Continens’ is very brief. Avicenna describes it in his ‘Mat.

Med.’ as being a nut similar to the nux vomica, and having seed like the

citron (?). Like the others, he says it inebriates, induces stupor, and

is inimical to the brain and heart. In the dose of a drachm he says it

proves fatal. (ii, 2, 501.) Ebn Baithar’s authorities give a full account

of it, but differing little from the others already given. One of them

says, that a drachm will kill on the spot, and in small doses it induces

stupor, vomiting, and loss of sense. They direct these bad effects to

be counteracted by the administration of an emetic of natron (soda), by

giving wine and pepper, and keeping up the heat of the body. The Hindoo

physicians held that it is alexiterial. See Susruta and Wise (Hindoo Med.)

An excellent modern authority says of the _Datura Metel_, that “its

seeds are narcotic, more powerful than the _Datura Stramomium_, and

produce temporary idiotcy.” Gray (Suppl. to Pharm. 52.) Dr. Lindley,

after describing the _Datura Stramonium_ as a violent narcotic, says of

the _Metel_, that it has a similar action. (Veg. Kingd. 619.) Comparing,

then, the effects of the _Nux Methel_, as described by the ancient

authorities with those of the _Datura Methel_, as given by those recent

authorities, we cannot hesitate in recognising their identity.

_Rachaba_, or _Nux Mechil_.

One of Serapion’s authorities states that an Arab had told him that it

is a great tree, like the nut-tree, having leaves like a great fig, and

fruit like small pomegranates, and speaks very indistinctly about its

being Pharoah’s nut; but it is difficult, from his language, to make

out what he says on that point. He says it is sweet, has a pleasant

smell, and is eaten by shepherds and others. He mentions that some had

confounded it with the nux vomica; but he concludes by saying that

whoever will compare the descriptions of the rachaba and nux vomica must

see the difference. (De Simpl. 164.) From this description it is quite

clear that this cannot be the nux vomica, but rather one of the eatable

figs, probably the _ficus benjamina_.

_Nux Henden_, or _Banden_.

See Serapion (De Simpl. 79) and Avicenna (ii, 2, 496.) According to the

latter it is a grainy mass, like the vetch, white, inclining to yellow,

which is brought from Barea and Chorasan, and of which a wine is made

with honey. He quotes Paulus (by some mistake we suppose) as saying of

it that it is refrigerant, extinguishes inflammation, and is slightly

desiccant. It suppresses fluxes of blood, fattens, cures impetigo, and

is aphrodisiac. Serapion’s authorities give a more lengthy description

of it, but do not supply many more particulars. Rhases, one of them,

calls it the fat of the earth, and the rock of the earth, and another

calls it pigeon’s root. They all agree that it makes an excellent wine,

which forms semen, fattens the body, and is aphrodisiac. They also state

that it stops fluxes, and causes vomiting. Ebn Baithar’s account of it

is nearly the same as Serapion’s. He says it is called honey earth in

Andalusia. (i, 274.) Sprengel suggests—how correctly we leave it to our

readers who are better acquainted with the productions of the East than

we can pretend to be, to determine—that it is the _Garcinia Mangostena_,

or Mangosteen, a fruit which has the reputation of being the finest in

the world. The description of it, given by Serapion, as far as we can

judge of it from the barbarous Latin translation, would certainly seem

to agree in some striking points with that of the mangosteen. Compare it

with ‘Loudon, Encycl. of Gardening,’ 1531.

_Meisce_, or _Mes_.

See Serapion (De Simpl. c. 116); Avicenna (ii, 2, 481); Ebn Baithar (ii,

465.) It is described at some length, and in nearly the same terms by

all these authors. They call it a small grain like a vetch, of a green

colour, and say that some used it for fasils, and that it was wholesome

but not very nutritious. They say of it that it is cold, and rather

desiccant, useful in catarrhs and coughs, and as a plaster to bruised

and torn parts. In our edition of Serapion it is marked as _mango_ in a

very old looking hand-writing, and it is recognised as the _Phaseolus

mango_ by Sprengel (R. H. H. i, 266), and by the German translator of Ebn

Baithar.

_Horon_, or _Bombax_.

See Serapion (De Simpl. 66) and Ebn Baithar (i, 305.) Abuhanifa, one

of Serapion’s authorities, says that some medical men had informed him

that cotton grows on trees like quinces. So at least we understand the

passage; but as it is very curious, and also very obscure, it may be well

to give the Latin translation: “Dixerunt mihi quidam medici de kelbe

quod _coton_ nascitur inter eos in arboribus quæ sunt sicut arbores

antipsicorum.” Compare Pliny (H. N. xii, 10.) The next of Serapion’s

authorities, Aben Mesuai, recommends the juice of it in the diarrhœa of

children. Mescha says its seed is beneficial in coughs and good for the

breast. Albasari says of it that it is good for clothes, and that its

juice is an excellent application in cutaneous diseases of the face.

Rhases also, as quoted by him, recommends it in the same cases, and

further says of it that it is aphrodisiac. Ebn Baithar’s authorities

also give an interesting account of it, recommending it in much the

same cases as those of Serapion, namely in infantile diarrhœa, and as

an application to cutaneous diseases; and he further states that it was

used to burn warts, no doubt like the raw flax, often mentioned in the

works of Hippocrates. The leaves are said to have been useful in uterine

complaints, and in gout mixed with rose-oil. Clothes prepared from it

are much praised by the author. There can be no doubt from what we have

stated, that it must have been the _Gossypium arboreum_ or _herbaceum_,

most probably the latter. See Meyen (Geogr. Botany.) From Ainslie’s Mat.

Ind. it will be seen that oil prepared from the former is still used for

cleaning the skin of spots, and that the leaves are given for the cure of

diarrhœa. (ii, 284.)

_Musa._

See Serapion (De Simpl. 84); Avicenna (ii, 2, 484); Ebn Baithar (ii,

535.) According to Serapion’s first authority, Aben Mesuai, it is hot

in the middle of the first degree, and moistening in the end of it,

little nutritious, and has the property of being useful in heat of the

breast, lungs, and bladder, and softens the bowels; if much used, it

creates a load on the stomach, and obstruction in the liver, and if taken

by a person of a cold temperament in great quantity, he ought to take

hydromel, oxymel, or prepared ginger with it. Another of his authorities,

Sindaxar, says it promotes the growth of the fœtus in utero. A third,

named Alchalebemen, says it is a good medicine for the chest and the

kidneys, and is diuretic. The book on ancient medicine, as quoted by

him, says of it that it is aphrodisiac, and heavy on the stomach; and

Avicenna’s account of it is so similar that it would not be worth while

to give an exposition of it. Ebn Baithar describes it minutely as being a

species of Palm. Its medicinal characters, as stated by him, are nearly

the same as those given above from Serapion. There can be no doubt that

it is the _Musa paradisiaca_, or common plantain tree. On it the reader

may find it interesting to consult Ainslie (Mat. Ind. 316), and Loudon

(Encycl. of Garden. 1530.) The plantain tree is briefly noticed by

Theophrastus (H. P. iv, 5), but does not occur in the works of the Greek

and Latin physicians.

_Granum Kelkel_, or _Alkelkel_.

See Avicenna (ii, 2, 302); Serapion (De Simpl. 275); Rhases (Contin.

l. ult. i, 378); Ebn Baithar (ii, 315.) Serapion’s authorities say of

it that it is hot and moistening, increases the secretion of semen,

especially when taken with the oil of sesame; that when taken in too

large a dose, it induces cholera, and after other food occasions vertigo.

The account of it given by Rhases and Avicenna is little different. The

latter says of it that it is fattening, and comforts relaxed bodies. Ebn

Baithar gives a very minute description of it; he says he planted it in

his own country, and that it produced fruit. He ascribes the same good

and bad effects to it as Serapion. When roasted, he says, it does not

engender bad chyme. Its seeds are said to be aphrodisiac. We suppose

there is little or no doubt that it is the _Cassia tora_. On the modern

use of it by the Hindoos, see Ainslie (Mat. Ind. ii, 405.)

_Lehibach_, or _Lahiba_.

See Avicenna (ii, 2, 425); Rhases (Contin. l. ult. i, 389.) Rhases quotes

Galen as saying of it that it has powers like horehound. We are at a

loss to say what substance he alludes to among the Simples of Galen.

Another authority quoted by him seems to say that a portion of it flung

into a lake containing fish, will make them swim on the surface, and

Avicenna confirms this statement. Avicenna further says it is emetic

and hydragogue. We would refer it with Sprengel (R. H. H. i, 249) to the

_Mussaenda frondosa_.

_Gilbenee._

Avicenna compares its seed to turbith, and its operation to hellebore.

He says when given to the amount of half a drachm it operates as an

emetic, and that one drachm may prove fatal. He mentions the case of a

paralytic person who took it, and having vomited was thereby cured. He

adds of it that it also acts as a purgative (ii, 2, 282.) It is evidently

the _gilbeuce_ of Rhases, who in like manner describes it as a powerful

emetic, the operation of which resembles hellebore, and is useful to

paralytics. More than a drachm of it, he says, given in a dose, may

occasion death. (Ad Mansor. iii, 30.) It appears decidedly to be the

_Cerbera manghas_ L., i. e. _Arbor lactaria_, Rumphius. See Sprengel (R.

H. H. i, 252); Ainslie (Mat. Ind. ii, 261.) Dr. Lindley says of it: “The

kernels of _Cerbera manghas_ are emetic and poisonous; the milky sap

is purgative; the leaves and bark are used in Java as a substitute for

senna.” (Veg. Kingd. 600.)

_Kustberkush._

Avicenna gives a description of it which appears to us very

unsatisfactory, but which determines Sprengel to refer it to the _Tamarix

orientalis_. He calls it hot and dry in the second degree, and attenuant.

(ii, 2, 371.)

_Nefrin_, or _Nerfin_.

See Avicenna (ii, 2, 506); Serapion (De Simpl. 187.) Avicenna compares

it to the narcissus, and says it resembles the jasmine in virtue, but is

weaker than it. He recommends it in coldness of the nerves, and as a cure

in noises and pains of the ears, and in toothache. He also recommends

it externally in headache, inflammations of the throat and tonsils, and

for stopping vomiting and hiccup. Serapion compares it to the rose and

jasmine, and recommends it in pleurisy and pains of the womb. Rhases, as

quoted by him, says that in Chorasan he had seen it given to the extent

of two drachms as a purgative. It seems highly probable that it is the

_Narcissus orientalis_.

_Muluchia._

Avicenna (ii, 2, 194); Serapion (De Simpl. 149); Ebn Baithar (ii, 537.)

Avicenna’s description of this article, which he also calls “Olus

Judaicum,” would seem to decide that it is the _Corchorus olitorius_ or

Jews’ mallow. The other two authorities quoted above are not so precise

in their description of it. It is more properly an article of food than

of medicine. See Lindley (Veg. Kingd. 372), and Ainslie (Mat. Ind. ii,

387.)

_Moschus._

Musk, the inspissated secretion of the follicle in the prepuce of the

_Moschus moschiferus_ L., would appear to be first mentioned in the

works of Aëtius (xvi, 122), who gives formulæ for various fumigations

(suffumigia) containing a great many aromatics, and among them musk. But

as we have already had occasion to state, we entertain strong suspicions

that the concluding chapters of this author may be spurious. Indeed, as

this important article is not noticed by authors subsequent to Aëtius,

such as Oribasius, it would appear to us that this circumstance is the

strongest possible presumption, that the passage in Aëtius had been

added after the Arabian period of medicine. There is one notice of it

also by our author, but it also has a suspicious appearance. (p. 292,

ed. Basil. See also 296.) Serapion gives a long account of it, first

upon the authority of Abuhanifa, who calls the animal the musk gazelle,

and says its habitat is in the countries of _Tumbasci_ and _Sini_, by

which he probably means Thibet and China. Of these the better kind, he

says, is that procured from Thibet, as the animal in that country lives

on fragrant herbs, and the inhabitants are better acquainted with the

process of extracting it from its follicles. And, moreover, he says, the

Sinenses (Chinese?) are apt to adulterate their musk. The animal which

produces musk, he adds, does not differ in figure, colour, nor horns from

other gazelles, and the best musk is procured after it is full grown.

He then gives an anatomical description of its canine teeth, and of the

modes of catching it by snares, gins, and by shooting it with arrows; and

also the manner of extracting the musk from the animal after its death.

But the best musk, he says, is procured from the animal when it is in a

state of orgasm, and rubs its follicles against a rock until the musk

drops out of them. The inhabitants of Thibet (homines de Thebeth) know

the places where the animal feeds, and collect the musk thus procured

from them. This, he remarks, is the finest musk of all, and is reserved

for royal personages and held in high esteem. This authority concludes by

saying that in the region of _Thebeth_ there are many cities, but that

the one, from which musk is procured, is that city which is properly

called _Thebeth_. His next authority is Alcholabama, who calls musk hot

in the second degree, and dry in the third. The following one, Aben

Mesuai, says of it, that it comforts the heart and internal viscera, both

when drunk and when applied externally in plasters. His next authority is

Honain, who recommends musk in diseases of the eyes. The others supply

little additional information on it, but in general recommend it in

diseases of the brain. He says the Persian doctors applied the oil to

the member as an aphrodisiac. (De Simpl. 185.) Rhases recommends musk in

headache, and all cold affections of the head, and also as a stomachic.

(Ad Mansor. iii, 22.) In his ‘Continens’ he quotes from several Arabian

authorities, all of whom give it the characters already stated, and

recommend it most especially in diseases of the brain and eyes. (l. ult.

i, 483.) Avicenna gives an accurate description of it, as far as we can

judge from the wretched translation of his works. He recommends it in

errhines with saffron, and with a little camphor for vertigo, and other

affections of the brain. He also thinks favorably of it as a cordial

in affections of the heart, and in melancholy. He concludes by saying

of it that it is alexipharmic, especially in cases of poisoning with

napellus. (ii, 2, 452.) See also his treatise (de Med. cordial., ii.)

There does not appear any distinct mention of it in the works of Mesue

the younger. It occurs frequently as an ingredient in the antidotes

of Myrepsus. Ebn Baithar gives a very full description of it and its

medicinal virtues, but it agrees so well with the description of it by

Serapion, that we need not enter much into particulars. He recommends it

particularly in diseases of the eyes, and says that the oil of it is a

useful application to piles, and when rubbed into the genital member, is

strongly aphrodisiac. It is, moreover, said to be an excellent cordial.

Of the Greek authorities Symeon Seth is the only one that gives anything

like a distinct account of musk. He describes three kinds, of which the

best is procured from a city east of Chorasan called _Trepet_ (Thibet?).

The next in quality is the Indian, and the worst is that which is

procured from the Sines (Chinese?). All the kinds, he says, are formed in

the umbilicus of an animal with one horn, resembling the gazelle. Like

Serapion he states that it is got from the animal while in a state of

sexual orgasm. Musk, he says, is hot and dry in the third degree, and of

a volatile nature. As to its medicinal powers, it strengthens weak parts,

and is beneficial in cold intemperaments of the head, but injurious in

hot. It is adapted for the recovery of persons in a fainting fit, in loss

of strength, and in affections of the heart. (De Alimentis.) An antidote

of musk occurs in Actuarius. (Meth. Med. v, 6.)

_Volubilis._

The seven books of Paulus Ægineta, volume 3 (of 3) · 第 42 / 61 段