According to Sprengel (R. H. H. i, 268) the first mention of the _Cocos

nucifera_, or cocoa-nut, occurs in the Itinerary of Abuzeid and Wahab.

No mention of it is made in the works of the Greek writers on medicine.

The Arabians describe it minutely as an article of food, so that it ought

to have been noticed by us in our Commentary on the 81st sect. of Book

I. Rhases treats of it very fully as a dietetical article, and also as

a medicine, saying of it that it purges away the tapeworm, that the oil

of it is useful both internally and externally in pains and flatulence

of the back, loins, knees, and in hemorrhoids; and he further quotes

Bemasuy in confirmation of this character of it. All his authorities held

it to be a hot and dry medicine. (Cont. l. ult. i, 506.) Avicenna gives,

almost word for word, the same account of it. The flesh of the cocoa-nut,

he says, is intensely white, and its juice sweet; and when there is not

much juice in it, we are to understand that it is old. The inner bark,

he says, is to be taken off, as being wholly indigestible. He recommends

it in exactly the same complaints as Rhases does, only as a vermifuge he

does not say that its oil brings away the tapeworm, but ascarides and

lumbrici. (ii, 2, 498.) Serapion gives a somewhat fuller description

of the cocoa-nut, which he knew to be the fruit of a palm-tree, but

otherwise his account of it is the same as that of the two authorities

already quoted. Of his Arabian authorities, one says that it is laxative,

and another that it is astringent. (De Simpl. 228.) Haly Abbas recommends

the Nux Indica as a comforter of the nerves in hemicrania, paralysis,

and epilepsy. (Pract. ii, 38, 248.) Mesue notices the “oleum ex nuce

Indica,” which, he says, is useful in nervous pains, purges the lungs

and chest, clears the voice, fattens, and engenders semen. (De Oleis,

i.) Ebn Baithar gives an interesting account of the cocoa-palm both

as a medicine and an article of food. He says its milk is at times

intoxicating and aphrodisiac, and that it is useful in certain complaints

of the urine, in tænia and other intestinal worms. The reader will

find it interesting to compare the above account of the cocoa from the

ancient authorities with what Ainslie says of it in his work, ‘Materia

Indica,’ i, 451; and Dr. Lindley in his late admirable publication on the

‘Vegetable Kingdom,’ (136.)

_Bdellium._

It has been supposed that under this head Avicenna (ii, 2, 112), and

other oriental writers, have included either that species of Palm called

_Borassus flabelliformis_; or another congener, _Hyphæne Thebaica_. See

Sprengel (R. H. H. i, 272); Ainslie (Mat. Ind. i, 452); Royle (Antiq.

of Hindoo Med. 90); Lindley (Veg. Kingd. 136.) The term, however, was

applied to other substances, as we have stated under the proper head.

_Tamarindi._

There is no doubt that we are indebted to the Arabians for our first

knowledge of this important medicine. Serapion, in describing this

article, quotes only from Arabian authorities, which implies that he

held the Greeks to have been unacquainted with it. Its leaves are said

to resemble those of the willow. His first authority, Abohanifa, says it

grows in Cæsaria; and his next, Aben Mesuai, says its fruit, which is of

a ruddy colour, and has much pulp, is brought from India. In temperament

it is said to be cold in the third degree, and has the power of purging

yellow bile gently, and of repressing its pungency; of stopping vomiting,

and removing pruritus. His other authorities, Abugerig, Mesebab, and

Mesarugie, give a similar account of it. (De Simpl. 348.) Rhases writes

of it in nearly the same terms: thus, he says, it extinguishes yellow

bile, opens the bowels, removes thirst and vomiting, and strengthens the

stomach. Its action is said to be similar to that of prunes. (Contin. l.

ult. i, 699.) On his own authority Rhases says of Tamarinds in another

place, that they are of a cold nature, loosen the bowels, repress intense

bile and blood. (Ad Mansor. iii, 49.) Avicenna calls Tamarinds cold and

dry in the second degree, says they are laxative, and more attenuant

than prunes, and contain less juice: that they stop excessive vomiting,

and thirst in fevers, and brace the stomach when it is relaxed. They

are beneficial, he adds, in syncoptic fevers, and other disorders in

which it is necessary to open the bowels gently. (ii, 2, 691.) Mesue

describes Tamarinds as being acidulous dates, or the fruit of wild

palms growing in India. He gives a very minute description of them,

which we need not copy. As to temperament he says, they are cold and

dry in the second degree; and in order to correct their bad effects in

cold affections of the stomach, he directs them to be mixed with mace,

spikenard, mastich, fennel, parsley, endive, &c. He further directs their

action to be increased by giving them in the whey of goats, the infusion

of fumitory or of hops. He gives very minute directions for preparing

Tamarind whey, both simple and compound. As to its virtues, he says, it

brings away bile, represses the ebullition of it, and the heat of the

blood, is beneficial in inflammation of the liver and stomach, quenches

thirst, removes all heat connected with it, is useful in jaundice, stops

vomiting, and is a good medicine in acute fevers which require to be

repressed. Being of a weak nature, Tamarinds, he says, require to be

given to the amount of from two to five ounces. (De Simpl.) Ebn Baithar’s

description of Tamarinds is full and accurate, but does not contain

anything of importance in addition to the information which we have

extracted from the other authorities who preceded him. (See Vol. I, 212.)

_Myrobalani._

We have stated under the head of _Balanus_, that the Greek authorities

before the Arabian period were entirely unacquainted with the stone

fruits which now bear the name of _Myrobalans_. As these substances are

now scarcely known in this country, we shall find it convenient again,

in the present instance, to give, in the first place, a brief account

of them from modern authorities. They are well described by Geoffroy,

Alston, the Commentators on Mesue, and many other writers on the Mat.

Med. They held a place in the British Dispensatory as late as the time

of Quincy, and are described by Boerhaave in his Mat. Med. They have not

lately been used in the practice of medicine either in Europe, or by our

English physicians in the East Indies, as far as we have been able to

learn. Five species are described by all writers on them, both ancient

and modern, namely, the Citrine, Belleric, Chebulic, Emblic, and Indian.

For a particular description of them see Sprengel (R. H. H. i, 262);

Ainslie (Mat. Ind. i, 236), and Royle (Antiq. of Hindoo Med.) According

to the last of these authors, the Black _or_ Indian, the Yellow _or_

Citrine, and the Chebulic, are the product of the _Terminalia Chebula_;

the fourth _or_ Beleric, of the T. Belerica, all belonging to the natural

tribe of medicines now called Combretaceæ; while the fifth _or_ Emblic is

the fruit of the _Phyllanthus Emblica_, now called _Emblica officinalis_.

See Lindley (Veg. Kingd. 280.) We shall now be able to apprehend the

descriptions of the ancient authors.

Rhases quotes several Arabian and Indian authorities on Myrobalans.

The Citrine _or_ Yellow, according to Badigorias (Pythagoras?), is

cholagogue, and the Black stomachic. The other authorities quoted by him

agree in generally holding that myrobalans are cholagogue and stomachic,

and that they are useful in hemorrhoids and palpitation of the heart.

Sarac, the Indian, recommends them as purgative and stomachic medicines

in mental diseases, hemorrhoids, headache, dropsy, and diseases of

the spleen. They all seem to be agreed in holding that myrobalans are

possessed of a purgative power compounded with astringency. (Contin. l.

ult. i, 473.) In his other works he recommends myrobalans for purging

yellow bile, and melancholy or black bile, and also as astringents.

(Divis. i, 144, and Ad Mansor. viii, 54.) In the latter work he says,

that in order to purge, the proper dose of citrine myrobalans is from

ten to twenty drachms. Avicenna describes four species of myrobalans,

namely, the Citrine, unripe, the black Indian, the Kebulic, and the

Chinese, meaning by the last, we suppose, the Emblic, or fruit of the

_Emblica officinalis_. He describes minutely their specific differences,

and states of their general virtues as medicines, that they are cold in

the first degree and dry in the second; that they all extinguish yellow

bile, and are useful in bilious complaints; that the black brightens

the colour, and all kinds are useful in leprosy. He recommends them

in diseases of the eyes, and in those of the chest accompanied with

palpitation and sorrow. He also states several minute distinctions among

them as to medicinal powers, which we do not think it necessary to enter

upon. (ii, 2, 449.) Serapion writes very elaborately on myrobalans,

of which he describes four species, the Citrine, the Black or Indian,

the Kebulic, and the Chinese citrine (Emblic?). The authorities quoted

by him are generally agreed, that myrobalans possess astringency

with bitterness, purge bile and whet the stomach; are cordial, and

prove useful in melancholy, &c. Sarac, the Indian, as quoted by him,

maintains of myrobalans, that they are hot and astringent, and at

the same time eccoprotic, that they strengthen the senses and the

nerves, are useful in leprosy, colic, old hemorrhoids, vertigo, and

dropsy, and that they induce nausea and vomiting. Honain gives minute

directions for the preparation of them, but these we shall not enter

upon. Some apothecaries, he says, fall into the mistake of selling

Kebulic myrobalans of a black colour for the true black kind. For the

true black myrobalans, he says, are brought from India, whereas of the

Kebulic, some are yellow and others black according to the time of

their growth at which they are gathered from the trees. He gives very

minute directions for administering them with other substances, such

as prunes, Sebesten plums, jujubes, and the like; but as most of these

substances are not now much known, it would not be interesting to most

readers to learn his remarks on this subject. (De Simpl. 107.) Mesue

also gives a very elaborate and circumstantial account of myrobalans,

which our necessary limits prevent us from giving at full length. He

ranks them with the Blessed Medicines (_medicinis benedictis_); for,

he adds, in loosening the bowels, they do not weaken but strengthen

the stomach, heart, liver, and the whole body. The only bad effect, he

says, which they ever produce, is obstruction. Their operation, he adds,

is wonderfully increased by combining them with scammony. He says, of

all the kinds, that they are cold in the first degree and dry in the

second. His directions for correcting any bad effects from the use of

them, and for increasing their operation, are most circumstantial, and

bespeak an intimate acquaintance with the subject. He eulogises them

in the strongest terms, declaring that they restore youth, improve the

complexion, the breath, and the perspiration, impart joy and hilarity,

strengthen the stomach, heart, and liver, are useful in palpitations,

cleanse the stomach, are useful in hemorrhoids, extinguish heat in

cholera, and this more especially the citrine. He also speaks favorably

of them in a prescribed preparation for complaints of the eyes, and

for tertian and bilious fevers. The Kebulic, he says, are phlegmagogue,

and especially the prepared kinds; they improve the sight, cleanse

and comfort the stomach, and are useful in dropsy and chronic fevers.

The Black bring away black and adust bile, are useful in melancholy

and palpitations, clear the colour, cure leprosy, remove sadness, and

are beneficial in quartans. The dose from two to five drachms. (De

Simpl. ii.) He treats separately of the Emblic and Belleric, but we

need not enter upon his account of them. And here we would refer our

readers to Costa’s commentary on this part of Mesue, as containing all

the interesting information which can be gleaned from ancient authors

on the subject of myrobalans. For the other Arabians, see Haly Abbas

(Pract. ii, 54); Averrhoes (Collig. v, 42); Ebn Baithar (pluries); and

Avenzoar (Antidot.) None of these supply much that is important after

what we have given from the other authorities. Of the Greek writers on

medicine, Actuarius is the only one that gives any distinct account of

myrobalans, and he professes to derive his information from “the wise

barbarian doctors,” meaning the Arabians. He first describes the Citrine,

the Kebulic, and the Black or Indian, and represents them as possessing

purgative powers, combined with some astringency and tonicity. Besides

these three kinds he mentions, as possessing purgative powers of a like

nature, two medicines, which he calls _empelilez_ and _empletze_, by

which he no doubt meant Emblic and Belleric. (Meth. Med. v, 8.) The

five kinds of myrobalans, namely, the Citrine, the Kebulic, the Indian,

the Belleric, and the Emblic, occur in one of the antidotes of Nicolas

Myrepsus, who recommends them in various remittent and intermittent

fevers. (i, 24.) Myrobalans have always been much esteemed by the Hindoo

physicians. See the Susruta, and Wise’s Book on Hindoo Medicine (pluries.)

_Manna._

Though the Arabians would certainly appear to have been the first to

introduce the substance now used medicinally under this name, it is

impossible to believe that the Greeks and Romans can have been wholly

unacquainted with it. It, we need scarcely inform our professional

readers, is procured principally from the _Ornus Europæa_ or flowering

ash, either by incision, or the puncture of an insect. The ancients,

however, applied this term to a variety of the _thus_, as we have stated

in the preceding commentary on this section, and also to the _honey-dew_

described in Vol. I, pp. 178, 179 of this work. We have further mentioned

under the head of _Elæomeli_, that it probably was some species of manna.

Altogether then the term we are now considering is often a puzzle in

reading the works of the ancient authorities. See further Ainslie (Mat.

Ind. i, 209); Sprengel (R. H. H.); Pereira (M. M. 928); Lindley (Veg.

Kingd. 547, 617, 737, 341, 342.) Even the Arabians, who appear to have

been perfectly well acquainted with its medicinal properties, confound it

with the honey-dew, and seem to say that it falls from heaven upon the

trees. Serapion describes it by the name of _Tereniaben_ or mel roris,

and says it falls from above upon certain trees, and resembles granulated

honey. Its virtues he states, upon the authority of Isaac ebn Amram, to

consist in opening the bowels, and moistening the chest, and he adds that

it suits with persons of a hot temperament, especially when dissolved

in water of jujubes, or of prunes. His other authorities recommend it

in the same complaints, and also in the inflammation of ardent fevers

and for quenching thirst. The dose is said to be from ten to twenty

drachms. (De Simpl. 10.) We may mention that Serapion and all the other

authorities mention that manna is found most abundantly on thorns.

Avicenna’s account of this subject is so like to that of Serapion that

it would be superfluous to give any abstract of it. (ii, 2, 694.) Rhases

also gives nearly the same description of manna upon the authority of

Abinerog, Mesaurice, Mesue, and Chuz. (Contin. l. ult. i, 711.) All these

authorities represent it as being a gentle purgative and expectorant,

and as being useful in acute and intermittent fevers. In another of

his works (Ad Mansor. ix, 14), treating of hoarseness and coryza, he

prescribes an expectorant decoction, one of the ingredients of which is

“_manna_, quam aërium appellant.” In his chapter on angina (ix, 51) he

prescribes a laxative medicine containing tamarinds, cassia fistula, and

“_manna_ quam veteres mel aërium appellant.” Mesue gives an elaborate

account of the origin, characters, temperament, and virtues of manna,

which is well worth consulting, although it contains nothing of any

great importance in addition to what is stated above on the authority of

Serapion, Avicenna, and Rhases. He would appear moreover to confound the

_manna thuris_ with the manna of the ash. Like the other authorities, he

holds manna to be a gentle cholagogue, and says it softens the throat,

the chest, the bowels, and quenches thirst. The dose from six to fifteen

drachms. (De Simpl. 8.) We have not found anything further of interest in

the works of Averrhoes, Haly Abbas, and Ebn Baithar. The last of these

says the Ros Melleus is a substance which falls upon trees in Chorasan;

that it is useful in ardent fevers, moistens the chest, proves more

detergent than sugar, cools thirst, improves the memory, purges yellow

bile, &c. He evidently alludes to the true manna of the ash. Actuarius

mentions cassia fistula and manna as two purgative medicines which may be

safely given to children and pregnant women. (Meth. Med. v.)

_Turpeth._

There can be no doubt that it is the _Convolvulus Turpethum_. Rhases

recommends turpeth for purging crude and recrementitious humours from the

knees and other joints. His two authorities, Mesue the elder, and Chuz,

give it the same character. (Contin. l. ult. i, 729.) Avicenna, after

describing it, represents it as being efficacious in diseases of the

nerves and joints, as being phlegmagogue, and if mixed with ginger, as

bringing away crude humours. (ii, 2, 701.) Serapion confounds it with the

tripolium of Dioscorides and Galen, as we have stated under that head.

Upon the authority of Aben Mesuai he assigns it the property of purging

viscid phlegm, but says that it brings on mental depression by its horrid

taste, and, therefore, it ought not to be taken alone. Other Arabian

authorities, quoted by him, give it the same character. He describes the

medicine very minutely, and the marks by which we may determine whether

it be sound or not. The dose is from one to two drachms. (De Simpl.

337.) Haly Abbas treats of it in his chapter on purgatives, but confines

himself principally to a description of the medicine itself. (Pract. ii,

2, 557.) The ancient author who has treated most fully of turpeth, is

Mesue the younger in his work ‘De Simpl.’ (11.) He gives a circumstantial

description of it, and full directions for correcting its bad

qualities by mixing it with other substances, such as scammony, dates,

ginger, almonds, &c. He recommends it principally as a phlegmagogue,

and an evacuant of gross humours in diseases of the joints, and as a

preservative from leprosy and other diseases of the skin. It has been

much disputed whether or not the turpeth of Mesue be the same as that of

the other Arabians. (See his Commentators l. c.) We see little reason for

questioning their identity. We have not found anything additional of much

interest in the great work of Ebn Baithar under this head. The turpeth of

Actuarius is the root of the pityusa, that is to say of the _Euphorbia

pityusa_. (Meth. Med. v, 9.) Dr. Ainslie, treating of the _Convolvulus

turpethum_, says: “Our present article had long a place in the Mat. Med.,

but of late years has fallen into disuse. Alston (M. M. ii, 530) speaks

of turpeth as being a strong resinous cathartic, recommended in his days

in gout, dropsy, and leprosy.” (Mat. Ind. ii, 384.) It is still known

in the shops as a rough purgative. See Gray (Suppl. to Pharm.) We are

satisfied that it was not known to the Greeks before the Arabian period,

that it was neither the Tripolium, as we have already stated, nor yet

the Alypias, as some have supposed. It has been long used as a purgative

medicine by the Hindoo physicians. See Wise (Hindoo Med. 145.)

_Dende._

Serapion gives a very lengthened account of the _Dend hayse_, and

describes two species of it. He speaks of part of it being poisonous, and

states that it purges strongly, and induces tenesmus. A person who has

taken of it is directed to vomit, to take butter and milk in drink with

astringents of a demulcent nature, such as purslane, gum Arabic, &c. He

mentions that it is a medicinal herb much used in India and Babylonia,

along with other purgatives, but he adds that it induces great debility

in that hot and dry country, whereas in Yemen, where the heat is attended

with great rains, no class of medicines answer so well as that which

possesses astringent and laxative powers combined, such as turpeth,

myrobalans, manna, and the like. But _dend_, he says, answers only in

cold countries like Seni (China?). When it brought on hypercatharsis, he

says, he directed his patient to sit in a cold hip-bath, and to get cold

water dashed over his body. (De Simpl. 388.) Avicenna’s description of

_dende_ is mostly taken from Serapion. He directs it to be administered

only in a cold country, and along with substances calculated to restrain

its violent operations, such as starch and saffron. He says it purges

humours and phlegm from the joints. (ii, 2, 215.) We have not been

able to discover any traces of it in the works of Haly Abbas, Rhases,

Mesue, nor Averrhoes. Ebn Baithar, however, treats of it fully. He

says, or at least his German translator makes him say, that it is the

_Ricinus_, and not an _Euphorbia_, as some had supposed. He gives a

minute description of three kinds—the Chinese, the Indian, and the

Arboreus; and of these the first is said to be the best and strongest in

its purgative operation. It is said to be hot, sharp, and oily, and to

purge the body effectually, especially the humours in the joints. It is

not given, he says, in hot countries, such as Irak, the sea-coast, the

land of Egypt, and Yemen, because fluxes in these countries are common,

and owing to the relaxation of the body, it cannot bear this violent

medicine. One of his authorities, Honain, wisely remarks that in all

hot countries severe medicines ought to be avoided. Minute directions

are given for counteracting its deleterious effects. It is said to act

as a hot drastic purgative, and to excoriate the intestines. Its bad

effects are best counteracted by an emetic, butter, gum lac, and other

demulcents. We used to think there could be little or no doubt but that

Sprengel was right in referring it to the strychnos colubrinus; but of

late, certain authorities, for whom we feel much respect, have held it

to be the _Croton Tiglium_. See Royle (Antiq. Hind. Med. 36; Mat. Med.

552); Pereira (739); and Sontheimer apud Ebn Baithar. We still think

that the _lignum colubrinum_ is at least as applicable to the dende. It

has been used medicinally in modern times. See Hill (Mat. Med. 693);

Gray (Pharmacop. 58); and Pereira (922.) Pereira mentions that he had

analysed it, and found that it contains nearly the same ingredients as

St. Ignatius’ Bean. Dr. Lindley calls the tree, which furnishes the

lignum colubrinum, the _Strychnos ligustrina_, and mentions of it that it

had been used in paralysis of the extremities, and as an anthelminthic.

(Veg. Kingd. 603.) Dr. Royle mentions (M. M. l. c.) that when in India

the seeds of the croton tiglium were given him as the _dund_ of the

Arabians. Is it not more probable that they were merely meant as the

_succedaneum_ of the _dende_?

_Fel._

Serapion treats of this substance under the same head with two others,

_bel_ and _sel_. The _bel_ has never been well ascertained, but Sprengel

and Ainslie are agreed that the _sel_ is the _Ægle marmelos_, on which

see Lindley (Veg. Kingd. 458.) And now with regard to the _Fel_, Serapion

describes it as a fruit having an external covering like a filbert,

containing a grain like that of the larger pine, its colour being

intermediate between yellow and white, and it, he adds, is the part which

is administered. He says it relieves the inflation of hemorrhoids. (c.

261.) Avicenna gives exactly the same account of _Fael_, which in the

glossarium is described as being “radix seu fructus nenufaris Indi.”

He calls it a well-known Indian medicine, useful in relaxation of the

nerves, and in inflation of hemorrhoids. He says his virtues are like

those of the apples of mandragora. (ii, 2, 251.) Rhases, in like manner,

says briefly of _Fel_ that it is a well-known Indian medicine, having

powers like those of mandragora. (Contin. l. ult. i, 298.) Dr. Ainslie

writes of it thus: “The croton nuts were known to the Arabian physicians

by the name of _fell_ (Serapion 261), and were formerly brought to

England under the name of _Molucca grains_.” (Mat. Ind. 106.) Sprengel

also in his R. H. H. refers the _Fel_ to the _Croton Tiglium_. Dr. Hill

says of the Molucca grains: “The grana tiglia are of the ricinus kind;

they are the _nucula cathartica quarta Moluccana purgatoria_,” &c. See

further p. 540, and Geoffroy (iii. 5, 30.) Certainly it appears to us

that the medicinal virtues of the _Fel_, as given above by Serapion,

Rhases, and Avicenna, do not agree well with the known powers of the

croton tiglium. We cannot, however, pretend to determine what substance

the Fel was.

_Santalum rubrum._

The seven books of Paulus Ægineta, volume 3 (of 3) · 第 40 / 61 段