COMMENTARY. Aristotle, Pliny, Philoponus, Phile, and Avicenna acknowledge

the animal nature of sponges, and yet we find it stated in most of our

modern treatises on natural history that the ancients supposed them to

be vegetables. Ebn Baithar, we believe, stands alone among the ancient

authorities in maintaining that there is no truth in the opinion that

the sponge is an animal, but that, on the contrary, it is decidedly a

vegetable which grows from the rocks. (i, 45.) Avicenna recommends the

use of sponge in the same cases as our author does. Serapion gives nearly

the same account of it. He says that the stones found in sponges are

lithontriptic. Of the two species described by Dioscorides, the hard

is the _S. fasciculata_, Pall., and the soft the _S. officinalis_. He

recommends sponge tent for dilating fistulous ulcers. He says they may be

applied like tents to sores; that with vinegar they restrain hemorrhages;

and that burnt sponges are useful in dry ophthalmy, and whenever you

want to deterge or astringe; but that when washed, they apply better in

ophthalmic remedies; and that, when burnt with pitch, they are suitable

in hemorrhages. (v, 137.) In the Hippocratic treatises this term is

generally applied to the tonsils or glands of the neck, as at ‘Epidem.’

(iv.) But in one passage of a work, certainly not genuine, it appears

to be used for the sponge. (De Morbis, ii.) Celsus prescribes a sponge

squeezed out of oil, vinegar, or cold water as an application to relieve

the swelling and heat of the gout (iv), and for other medicinal purposes.

Galen gives an interesting article under this head, and describes an

ingenious process by which, he says, that he had known a hemorrhage

stopped. A sponge dipped in asphaltus, or, in the absence of it, in tar,

having been laid on the bleeding place, it was set fire to until it

formed an eschar on the surface, while the remainder of it was left as a

farther cover to the vessels. (De Simpl. xi.) The Arabians treat fully

of the “Spongia maris,” and quote what Dioscorides and Galen had written

respecting it. Avicenna decidedly says that sponge was supposed to be an

animal possessed of motion. He and Rhases recommend it principally for

cleansing sores and stopping bleeding. (ii, 2, 595, and Cont. l. ult.

676.)

Σπόδιον,

Spodium has similar powers to the pompholyx.

* * * * *

COMMENTARY. It is nearly the same as the Pompholyx. Pliny thus states

the difference between them: “Etiamnum in ærariis reperiuntur, quæ

vocant pompholygem et spodon. Differentia quod pompholyx loturâ paratur,

spodos illota est.” (H. N. xxxiv, 33.) The name, in modern times, has

been applied to burnt ivory. See Gray (Suppl. to Pharm. 260), and

Platearius (De Simp. Med. 250.) The ancient spodium was an impure oxyd

of zinc. The term, however, was sometimes applied to other recrements,

as we are informed by Pliny (l. c.), and Dioscorides (v, 85.) He gives a

more minute description of the preparation of it and of pompholyx. The

Arabians treat of both under the general name of _Tucia_ or Tutty, which

was long retained in modern times. They used it very freely in diseases

of the eyes, and also in those about the genital organs. See Serapion (c.

422); Avicenna (ii, 2, 695); Rhases (Cont. l. ult. i, 730); Haly Abbas

(Pract. ii, 45, 474.) The spodium occurs frequently as an ingredient

in the collyria and ointments described by Celsus (v, 6), &c. We need

scarcely remind the reader that tutty ointment has continued to be used

as an ophthalmic even to our own times. The _spodos_ of the Hippocratic

writers would appear to have been applied in a more general sense to

various recrements of the metals. (De Ulceribus.) The spodium of the

Arabians would seem to have been the ashes of the privet. See Avicenna

(ii, 2, 609); Rhases (Cont. l. ult. 675.)

Σταφυλῖνος,

Staphylinus, _Carrot_, is diuretic and promotes menstruation,

particularly the seed and root. But the leaves being possessed of

detergent powers agree with phagedænic affections when applied green

along with honey. The wild is for all purposes stronger than the

cultivated.

* * * * *

COMMENTARY. As Sprengel states, it is undoubtedly a variety of the

_Daucus Carota_, L., or _Wild Carrot_. Diphilus, as quoted by Athenæus,

says that it is acrid, nutritive, moderately stomachic, laxative,

flatulent, indigestible, diuretic, and aphrodisiacal. (Deipnos. ix, 2.)

Pliny mentions that it proves useful in strangury, dropsy, and several

other complaints. (H. N. xx, 15.) Plinius Valerianus says of it that it

had been given in diseases of the liver, spleen, loins, and kidneys, in

hydromel. (iv, 32.) Our author’s account of its medicinal properties

is mostly condensed from Dioscorides. He recommends it strongly as a

diuretic, emmenagogue, and aphrodisiac, and says of it, that applied

_per vaginam_ it procures the expulsion of the fœtus. (iii, 52.) Galen

and Aëtius give nearly the same account of it as our author. The Arabian

authorities speak of it in the same terms. See Avicenna (ii, 2, 287);

Rhases (Cont. l. ult. iii, 18); Serapion (c. 265.) The commentator

Eustathius mentions its aphrodisiacal properties. (Ad Iliad. xviii, 560.)

According to Dierbach, the σ. of Hippocrates comprehends both the _Daucus

Carota_ and _guttatus_. It would appear to us that this is the “Pastinaca

agrestis” of Celsus (ii, 31), although his editor, Dr. Milligan, decides

otherwise with regard to it. In confirmation of our opinion we refer to

Pliny (l. c.), and to Beckmann’s ingenious disquisition on our kitchen

vegetables in his ‘Hist. of Invent.’ He seems clearly to make out that

the daucus, staphylinus, carota, and pastinaca were all merely varieties

of the _Daucus Carota_. He is in some doubts, however, whether the

“pastinaca” was not also sometimes applied to the parsnip. See, however,

under _Daucus_.

Στάχυς,

Stachys, _Base Horehound_, is a shrub resembling horehound, and is

calefacient in the third degree. It therefore promotes menstruation,

kills the fœtus, and expels the secundines.

* * * * *

COMMENTARY. It is the _Stachys Palestina_, or _Base Horehound_. Our

author gives exactly the same account of its medicinal properties as

Dioscorides and Galen, the latter remarking of it that it not only

promotes menstruation, but is a drug used for procuring abortion.

Pliny, by confounding πράσον and πράσιον, says of it that it resembles

the _porrum_ instead of the marrubium; so that his celebrated editor,

Harduin, holds that the stachys of Pliny is different from that of

Dioscorides. (Ad H. N. xxiv, 86.) It is quite clear, however, that the

plants are identical, and accordingly Pliny, like the other, says of his

stachys, that it is emmenagogue. The Arabians do not seem to treat of it.

Στέατα,

Adipes, _Fats_, or _Grease_; all kinds dilute and warm the human body,

but their powers vary according to the different temperaments of animals.

That of swine, then, is the most humid of all, its powers being like

those of oil. Hence it blunts sharp pains. That of goats is drier

and sooner coagulated, and therefore is used as an injection to those

who have sharp pains in the rectum. That of geese is hotter and more

attenuate; that of domestic cocks and hens being intermediate. That of

lions is the hottest of all and the most attenuate, hence it is most

discutient. That of oxen has an intermediate temperament between swine

and lions. That of bears cures alopecia, that of foxes, earache; as that

of vipers is said to remove hairs and prevent suffusions from forming.

Upon the whole, that of males is the hotter and more desiccative, and of

them those which have their testicles more than those which have been

cut, and of those which are full-grown than that of the others. All sorts

of grease when long kept become hotter.

* * * * *

COMMENTARY. _Fats._ Our author’s account of their medicinal properties

is sufficiently ample. For further information, however, the reader may

consult Dioscorides and Galen. The former gives very minute and seemingly

important directions for the preparations of all these animal fats. We

may just mention here a little piece of criticism which Galen bestows

in this case upon his much admired predecessor. Dioscorides says of the

grease _or_ lard of goats, that it is more styptic (στυπτικώτερον) than

that of swine. Upon which Galen remarks that although Dioscorides had

written much and well on the Materia Medica, he often uses words in a

wrong signification, as he does in the present instance, for that the

above-mentioned term, which properly signifies astringent, must here be

understood to mean acrid or pungent. Now we think that Galen is here

correct, and that Sprengel’s attempt to bring his author, Dioscorides,

clear off in the present case is not successful. Indeed, as we firmly

believe that a greater master of the Greek language than Galen never

existed, we may always feel secure that where the exact meaning of Greek

terms is concerned, one may safely trust to him. The Arabians under this

head merely give extracts from Dioscorides and Galen. See in particular

Serapion (De Simpl. 461) and Avicenna (ii, 2, 70.)

Στίμμι,

Antimonium, _Antimony_, in addition to its desiccative powers, has also

astringency. Hence it is mixed with collyria for the eyes.

* * * * *

COMMENTARY. This is evidently the sulphuret of antimony. The native

antimony is so rare a mineral that it is not likely the ancients had any

acquaintance with it, and the factitious antimony is not described by any

ancient author. For an account of the ancient antimony, see in particular

Dioscorides (v, 99) and Pliny (H. N. xxxiii, 33.) It was much used by the

ancients in the composition of the medicines called calliblephara. “Vis

ejus astringere et refrigerare principalis autem circa oculos.” Pliny

(l. c.) In the Old Testament the Jewish women are censured for this use

of it. None of the Greek or Latin authors speak of giving it internally

except Serapion, who quotes Badigorus (Pythagoras?) as stating that it

proves a remedy for epilepsy and gross superfluities. (c. 249.) In its

calcined state it was made into pastils of a square form, and hence the

metal itself is called τετράγωνον by Hippocrates, as has been supposed

by his expositors. See Galen (Exeg.) and Föes (Œcon. Hippocrat. 371.)

Hippocrates recommends it as a medicine for purging the head (De Intern.

Affect.), that is to say, as an ingredient in _caputpurgia_, or errhines,

to the use of which he was partial. (See Vol. I, pp. 59, 60 of this

work.) But with the authorities subsequent to him its principal use would

seem to have been confined to collyria. See in particular Haly Abbas

(Pract. ii, 48); Averrhoes (Collig. v, 43.) Celsus frequently uses it for

this and other purposes.

Στοιβὴ,

Stœbe, _Knapweed_; the fruit and leaves are desiccative in the third

degree, being possessed of astringent powers. Hence they agglutinate

large wounds; and the decoction of them relieves dysentery, hemorrhages,

and discharges of pus from the ear; and in a cataplasm it is of use in

suggillations of the eye from a blow.

* * * * *

COMMENTARY. There has been considerable difference of opinion among

modern authorities on this head, as is fully stated by Parkinson (Theatre

of Plants, 998), and by Sprengel (Ad Dioscor. iv, 12.) We acquiesce in

the judgment of those who hold it to be the _Poterium spinosum_. See

Galen (De Antidot. 426, T. ii, ed. Basil.) Our author’s notice of it

is manifestly taken from Galen, who, in his turn, is much indebted to

Dioscorides. (iv, 12.) None of the others add anything of interest

respecting it. It does not occur in the works of Hippocrates nor of

Celsus, nor have we been able to detect it in those of the Arabians,

except Ebn Baithar, who quotes only Dioscorides and Galen under this

head. (ii, 19.)

* * * * *

Στρούθιον. It appears singular that our author should have omitted the

Struthium, which is noticed in this place by Dioscorides and Galen. This

is the celebrated soap-plant used by the fullones or cleansers of cloth

in ancient times. The reader will find a very interesting disquisition

on it in Beckmann’s ‘History of Inventions.’ We think there is every

probability that it was the _Saponaria officinalis_. Dioscorides

represents it to be diuretic, emmenagogue, and lithontriptic, a remedy

for diseases of the chest, the liver, the spleen, and for jaundice;

a discutient application to indolent tumours, a sternutatory, and a

masticatory. (ii, 192.) By the way, the famous writer Lucian mentions

an amusing example of its use as a masticatory. (De Alexandro.) Galen

states its virtues in general terms; he says it is acrid and detergent,

and hence it acts as a sialogogue. We have not been able to find it in

the works of Hippocrates. See Pliny (T. ii, 341, 161, 410, ed. Harduin)

and Celsus (v, 18.) The Arabians treat of it very fully. See Avicenna

(ii, 2, 133); Serapion (De Simpl. 362); Rhases (Contin. l. ult. iii,

38.) They all hold it to be emetic, and when it cannot be procured they

recommend in its place nux vomica. They also recommend it for all the

medicinal purposes enumerated by Dioscorides. The soap-wort has been used

medicinally in modern times. See Culpeper (172), Lewis (M. M. 339), and

Gray (Suppl. to Pharmacop. 115.) Quincy gives a very confused account of

it. (138.) In the modern Greek Pharmacopœia it is still retained. (144.)

Στοιχάς,

Stœchas, _Cassidony_, or _French Lavender_; it is deobstruent, attenuant,

detergent, and strengthens all the viscera and the whole habit of the

animal.

* * * * *

COMMENTARY. It appears to be the _Lavandula Stœchas_, or French Lavender.

See Tournefort (M. M.) Pliny says that it is an odoriferous herb of a

bitter taste. He adds that it promotes menstruation and relieves pains of

the breast. (H. N. xxvii, 107.) Dioscorides recommends it for diseases

of the chest and for antidotes. (ii, 28.) Galen has some very sensible

remarks on its qualities as perceived by the taste, and recommends it

in the same cases as our author. See also ‘De Antidot.’ (i.) Avicenna

and Rhases recommend it for epilepsy and melancholy. According to the

Arabians it is purgative and alexipharmic, but Dr. Hill denies that it

possesses these powers in any considerable degree. It still held a place

in our Mat. Med. when Lewis wrote. (ii, 389.) It is retained in the

modern Greek Pharmacopœia.

Στρατιώτης,

Achillea, _Yarrow_; that which grows in water is possessed of cold

powers, but the land has astringency; hence it agglutinates ulcers. Some

use it for hemorrhages and fistulæ.

* * * * *

COMMENTARY. The land is decidedly the _Achillea Millefolium_, the

river the _Pistia Stratiotes_. The millefoil got the name of Achillea

from being supposed the herb used by Achilles in dressing wounds. V.

Eustathius (ad Iliad, xi, ad finem.) Our author copies almost word for

word from Galen, who, however, is equally indebted to Dioscorides for the

characters of the yarrow. Regarding the water plant, Dioscorides says

that it preserves wounds free from inflammation, and cures erysipelas

and œdema in a cataplasm with vinegar. (iv, 100, 101.) These plants are

not to be found in the works of Hippocrates, Celsus, nor of the Arabian

authorities, as far as we can discover, with the exception of Ebn

Baithar, who merely gives extracts under this head from Dioscorides and

Galen (ii, 30), and of Rhases, who merely quotes Galen. (Cont. l. ult.

637.) The _Pistia Stratiotes_ is still used by the Hindoo physicians as

a demulcent in dysuria, and as a cataplasm for hemorrhoids. See Lindley

(Veg. King. 125.) The yarrow held a place in our Dispensatory with its

ancient character down to a late date. See Quincy (92) and Lewis (M. M.

108.) It still holds a place in the modern Greek Pharmacopœia (109.)

Στρύχνος,

Strychnos, Solanum (?), _Nightshade_ (?), or _Alkekengi_, i. e. _Winter

Cherry_; the garden and esculent sort is astringent and cooling in the

second degree. The halicacabum is like the garden, having a diuretic

fruit like the grape of a vine. The bark of the root of the Strychnos

somnifera when drunk with wine to the amount of a dram is soporific. And

it has a diuretic seed, being of the third order of refrigerants; hence

when drunk in greater quantity than twelve clusters it occasions madness.

The fourth species is not used internally, but when applied externally it

cures spreading ulcers, belonging to the second order of refrigerants and

desiccants.

* * * * *

COMMENTARY. We must not venture upon the discussion of disputed points

respecting the _Strychni_ of the ancients, for which we beg to refer

our readers to the Appendix to Dunbar’s Greek Lexicon, and we shall

merely state our conclusions so far as they are interesting to the

professional reader. Of the four species described by Dioscorides, the

1st, or Strychnus hortensis, is the _Solanum nigrum_, or its variety _S.

miniatum_; the 2d, or Halicacabum, is the _Physalis alkekengi_; the 3d,

or S. somniferum, is the _Physalis somnifera_; and the 4th, or Furialis,

is the _Solanum Sodomæum_. Several learned authorities, however, have

taken the last for the _Atropa Belladonna_. Our author in the main

follows Dioscorides, who treats of the virtues of the _Strychni_ at

so great length that we dare not attempt to follow him in the present

instance. The first he does not administer internally, but recommends

it very largely as an external application for erysipelas, herpes,

headache, heat of the stomach, affections of the eye, the siriasis of

children, earache, the fluor albus, &c. The second, he says, resembles

the first in virtue. The third, he says, has the same powers as the

juice of the poppy. The fourth brings on phantasies and delirium, and in

large doses proves fatal. The best counter-agent to it is undiluted wine

drunk and afterwards vomited. (iv, 72-5.) Celsus frequently prescribes

“solanum quam στρύχνον Græci vocant,” and ranks it among those things

which repress and soothe. (ii, 33.) He recommends it as an application

in phrenitis and various other diseases. (iii, 18.) Galen and Aëtius

give nearly the same account of it as our author. Oribasius confessedly

borrows his description from Dioscorides. The Arabians treat fully of the

solanum, of which Avicenna mentions that there are five species. (ii,

2, 646.) See Serapion (De Simpl. 138); Rhases (Cont. l. ult. i, 662);

Averrhoes (Collig. v, 42); Ebn Baithar (ii, 212.) The characters which

they give of these plants agree in the main so well with those given to

them by the Greeks, that we need not stop to note slight differences. The

Latin writers of the middle ages call solanum by the name of maurella.

See Macer Floridus. He says of the strychnos that it is possessed of

powerfully narcotic properties. The Solanum nigrum held a place in our

Dispensatories, and retained the characters transmitted down with it from

antiquity as late as the end of the last century. See Lewis (M. M.) All

our old herbalists, Gerard, Parkinson, and Culpeper, speak of its virtues

in the same terms as Dioscorides. Our toxicologists have decided that it

is a powerful narcotic. See Orfila. The _Physalis somnifera_ is still

used in India as an application to inflammatory tumours. See Lindley

(Veg. King. 621.) The _alkekengi_ is still admitted to be possessed of

a diuretic power, as stated by Dioscorides. (Ibid.) We are not aware

of the Solanum Sodomæum having ever been used medicinally in modern

times, but we need scarcely say that of late years the Atropa Belladonna

has occupied no undistinguished place in our Dispensatories. On the

_Strychnos furiosa_ as a poison, see Vol. II, p. 224.

Στυπτηρία,

Alumen, _Alum_; all kinds of it are very sour, and consist of gross

particles. But the alumen scissile, or _Stone Alum_, consists of more

subtile parts than the others. After it is the Alumen rotundum, or _Round

Alum_, and the astragolotum. The Alumen liquidum, or _Liquid Alum_,

consists of gross parts; and so also the varieties called placitis and

plinthitis.

* * * * *

COMMENTARY. After having read much that has been written by the best

authorities both ancient and modern upon this subject, we still approach

the discussion of it with very great diffidence. Having deliberately

considered what Beckmann has written regarding the ancient alum, we

cannot agree with him in setting it down as being copperas or the green

sulphate of iron. The ancients, indeed, may not always distinguish

accurately the latter from “the sulphate of alum and potash,” but

considering how common this mineral is in the countries bordering upon

the Mediterranean, we cannot conceive how the ancients could possibly

have remained ignorant of it, and we need scarcely add that it has never

been pretended that _it_ has been described by them under any other

name. But its varieties differed much from one another. The Alumen

plumosum, called τριχῖτις by the Greeks, was no doubt the _Hair salt_ of

Werner, which, according to the analysis of Klaproth, contains a large

mixture of the sulphates of magnesia and iron. Geoffroy remarks that “of

liquid alum two kinds are taken notice of by the ancients; the one pure

and the other impure. The solid or concreted kind was by the ancients

distinguished, according to the figure of its parts, into fissile and

round. The fissile natural alum was either in form of a compact, uniform

globe, or appeared divided into small hairs or filaments. The round

kind was of a more rare texture.” The Alumen Jameni of the Arabians

was the plumose alum. Pliny and Octavius Horatianus recommend alum as

an application to burns when pounded with oil. Alum was used in the

practice of medicine from the earliest times. Hippocrates prescribes

it in ulcers of the womb, diseases of the gums, and for various other

purposes. (Epid. vii, De Mulieb., De Ulcer., &c.) Our author borrows from

Galen. Dioscorides gives a most elaborate description of the different

kinds and of their uses in medicine. They are all possessed, he says,

of a heating power, and also of an astringent, and hence they clear

the obscurities of the cornea, melt down fungous flesh on the eyelids

and elsewhere, the schistose being more powerful than the round; they

stop mortifications and hemorrhages, repress flaccid gums, strengthen

loose teeth with vinegar or honey; are beneficial in aphthæ; and, in

short, he states most minutely the various purposes to which alum may be

applied. On the alumen see also Pliny (H. N. xxxv, 52) and Celsus (iv,

18), with the note of Milligan. For the Arabians consult Avicenna (ii,

2, 68); Averrhoes (Collig. v, 43); Serapion (De Simpl. 420); Haly Abbas

(Pract. ii, 44); Rhases (Cont. l. ult. 38); Ebn Baithar (ii, 83.) All of

these authors, even including the last, do little more than copy from

Dioscorides and Galen under this head. Geber, however, treats of the

subject with some appearance of originality, and describes the kinds of

alum with considerable accuracy. (Invention of Verity, c. 4.) The process

of burning alum for medicinal purposes, which is barely alluded to by

Dioscorides, is described by Geber and by Servitor. (i.)

Στυραξ,

Storax, is calefacient, emollient, and digestive. It therefore is useful

in coughs, catarrhs, and defluxions; and promotes menstruation both when

drunk and applied on a pessary.

* * * * *

COMMENTARY. It is clearly our officinal storax, or _Styrax officinale_.

Dr. Pereira has given the ancient history of this substance so correctly,

as to leave us little further to add under the present head. (Mat.

Med. 931.) As he states, the storax has been described by Hippocrates,

Theophrastus, Pliny, and Dioscorides. The several varieties described by

the last of these, Dr. Pereira ingeniously refers to kinds of storax,

with which we are still acquainted. The _Styrax Calamita_ is mentioned

by our author in the eleventh Section; according to him it is but a

variety of the amygdaloid storax, which was formerly imported enveloped

in a monocotyledonous leaf. Dioscorides’s description of its medicinal

properties agrees well with our author’s, but is considerably fuller. (i,

79.) Galen and the other Greek authorities treat of it like our author.

Celsus prescribes it frequently as an emollient, discutient, concoctive,

and suppurative medicine. (v, 18, 22, c. &c.) The Arabians treat of it

at considerable length, but do not add much of any practical importance

to what had been written on it by Dioscorides and Galen. See Avicenna

(ii, 2, 423); Serapion (c. 46); Averrhoes (Collig. v, 42); Rhases (Cont.

l. ult. i, 687); Ebn Baithar (ii, 428.) Upon the whole, Serapion’s

account appears to us most interesting. His Arabian authority, Isaac Eben

Amram, mentions that it was used by the Christians in their churches for

fumigations. Avicenna, according to Dr. Hill, is the only one among the

Arabians who distinguishes the solid storax, which we have been treating

of from the liquid, or _Styrax liquidus_. It is quite a different

substance, being procured from the _Liquid amber orientale_, according to

Dr. Lindley. (Veg. King. 253.)

Σύκα,

The seven books of Paulus Ægineta, volume 3 (of 3) · 第 32 / 61 段