SMALL CANAL FIRST PLANNED.

The plan, at this time, was to have a lock-sill only 16 or 18 feet

deep. This would be sufficient to allow empty ships to enter or leave

the canal, but not loaded. The mere building of ships was thus the

principal thought, despite the rhetoric on commercial and industrial

possibilities. Perhaps the leaders who were beating the project into

shape were themselves afraid to think in the millions necessary to do

the work to which New Orleans finally dedicated itself; perhaps they

realized that the figure would stagger the minds of the people and

defeat the undertaking, if they were not gradually educated up to the

mark.

Meeting on February 15, 1918, the Dock Board resolved unanimously to

put the plan through, if it proved feasible. W. B. Thompson was

president of the board; the other members were Dr. E. S. Kelly, Thomas

J. Kelly, B. B. Hans and O. P. Geren. Later, E. E. Lafaye took Mr.

Kelly's place on the board.

The Public Belt Railroad board had in the meantime (February 13) voted

to pay the Dock Board $50,000 a year; and the Levee Board (February 14)

to give $125,000 a year. As the plans were increased, the Levee Board

later increased its bit to $925,000.

Mayor Behrman, Arthur McGuirk and R. S. Hecht laid the proposition

before both bodies. Action was unanimous. Colonel J. D. Hill, speaking

for the Belt Railroad Board, said: "I am glad that at last there has

been outlined a plan which seemingly makes it possible to construct the

canal. It will not only result in the eventual construction of a big

fleet of ships, but will prepare the way for a tremendous industrial

activity in other lines. The consensus has been that a navigation canal

is needed to induce large manufacturers, importers and exporters to

establish their factories and warehouses here. This project will be the

opening wedge."

Members of the Public Belt Board voting, besides Colonel Hill and Mayor

Behrman (ex-officio) were Ginder Abbott, Arthur Simpson, John H.

Murphy, W. B. Bloomfield, Adam Lorch, George P. Thompson, Thomas F.

Cunningham, Victor Lambou, Edgar B. Stern and Sam Segari.

Members of the Levee Board voting were: William McL. Fayssoux,

president, Thomas Killeen, Thomas Smith, John F. Muller, James P.

Williams, John P. Vezien.

W. B. Thompson, president, put the matter before the Dock Board. "The

idea" he said, according to the minutes of the meeting of February 15,

1918, "had always received his approval, and he thought that the mayor

would recall that in the preparation, he with the city attorney, had a

very considerable part in framing the same, and he had taken an active

interest in the matter; he had always been in favor of the Industrial

Canal, and he believed in the possibility of development of New Orleans

through this, as a terminus; and it was entirely logical that the Dock

Board should do all that may lie within its power to bring about the

successful consummation of this project; the only doubt in his mind

being as to the feasibility of the project from the financial

standpoint. It seems now, however, that a plan has been devised,

through efforts of the mayor and Mr. Hecht, which gives every promise

of success. The co-operation of the city on behalf of the Public Belt

Railroad, and of the Levee Board, apparently removed the difficulties

in respect to the financial end. The Dock Board welcomes the assistance

and co-operation of the city and of the Levee Board, but inasmuch as

these boards are merely contributing certain amounts per year, and

whereas the Dock Board is the obligor in respect of the principal of

the bond issue, it devolves upon the Dock Board to use great caution

before committing itself to any particular plan in a matter which so

vitally affects the credit of the Dock Board, the city of New Orleans

and the Levee Board. President Thompson further stated that he

unhesitatingly endorsed the project and that he was sure that every

member of the board agreed, and the board would be glad to give prompt

consideration to the particular plan in question and reach some

conclusion which will insure the realization of this great project."

To estimate the probable cost of the canal, Mayor Behrman appointed the

following committee of engineers: W. J. Hardee, city engineer; A. F.

Barclay, engineer of the Public Belt Railroad; George G. Earl,

superintendent of the Sewerage & Water Board; C. T. Rayner, Jr.,

engineer of the Levee Board and Hampton Reynolds, contractor.

On February 22, the committee reported that, not counting real estate,

a canal could be built for $2,626,876. This estimate called for a lock

600 feet long, 70 feet wide, and 18 feet deep, and a barge canal to the

lake. The cost of constructing the lock was put at $1,370,660, and of

digging the canal $1,256,216.

This report was first received by a special committee composed of Mayor

Behrman, W. B. Thompson, Col. J. B. Hill, R. S. Hecht and Major W. McL.

Fayssoux. This committee referred it to the Dock Board, which adopted

it February 22.

Financial arrangements were completed at this same meeting. In order to

have sufficient to pay for the land which would have to be expropriated

for the canal, and to give some leeway, it was decided to issue bonds

for $3,500,000, with an option of floating $1,000,000 more within 30

days. A financial syndicate, consisting of the Hibernia, Interstate and

Whitney-Central banks of New Orleans, the William R. Compton Investment

Company of St. Louis, and the Halsey, Stuart Company of Chicago, agreed

to take the entire issue. The bonds were to run 40 years and begin to

mature serially after 10 years. They were to bear 5 per cent interest,

and to be sold at 95. They would be secured by a mortgage on the real

estate of the canal site, and by the taxing powers of the state, for

they were a recognized state obligation, as Arthur McGuirk, special

counsel of the Dock Board, pointed out in his opinion of July 10, 1918.

He added: "I am likewise of opinion that said bonds are unaffected by

any limitations upon the state debt, or upon the rate of taxation for

public purposes; that the said bonds are entitled to be paid out of the

general funds, or by the exercise of the power of taxation insofar as

the revenues, funds or property preferentially pledged or mortgaged to

secure said issue may fail, or be insufficient, to pay the same."

The following sat with the Dock Board and its attorneys at the meeting

of February 22: Mayor Behrman, J. D. Hill of the Public Belt Railroad,

R. S. Hecht, president of the Hibernia Bank, J. D. O'Keefe,

vice-president of the Whitney-Central Bank, C. G. Reeves,

vice-president of the Interstate Bank, W. R. Compton of the Compton

Investment Company, H. L. Stuart of Halsey, Stuart and Company, W. J.

Hardee, city engineer, and Hampton Reynolds, contractor.

The selection of the site was left, by the state law, to the commission

council. There were a number of possible routes, and the selection was

made with the utmost secrecy to prevent real estate profiteering. At

first the area bounded by France and Reynes streets was chosen. This

was on February 28. On May 9, however, the site was changed to the area

bounded by France and Lizardi streets, north from the Mississippi River

to Florida Walk, thence to Lake Pontchartrain. This is a virtually

uninhabited region in the Third District, through the old Ursulines

tract. The site chosen for expropriation is five and a third miles long

by 2,200 feet wide, 897 acres.

For this land the Dock Board paid $1,493,532.24, which is at the rate

of $1,665 an acre. The valuation was reached by expropriation

proceedings.

In the meantime, Commodore Ernest Lee Jahncke had asked to be allotted

the first site on the Industrial Canal, and Doullut & Williams for the

second. Both were for shipyards. The Foundation Company, which was

operating a number of shipyards in various parts of the country, sent

an engineer here to see if it would be feasible for the concern to

build a shipyard here.

Even before the piledrivers and dredges were on the job, the millions

were being counted for investment in the city whose remarkable

enterprise had won the admiration of the country.

The Industrial Canal and Inner Harbor of New Orleans History, Description and Economic Aspects of Giant Facility Created to Encourage Industrial Expansion and Develop Commerce · 第 21 / 35 题