Our trouble seems to be, not with civil service as an abstract

proposition, but with the type we have been getting. It is about Z-99

as compared with the real thing. It has too many flat wheels to run

smoothly. It must be jacked up high enough for new trucks and a

stronger kingbolt. True civil service presupposes maximum care in

original selection. It doesn't mean that we shall wait until the grain

and the coal begin to move before we figure on more crews. It rather

contemplates having available firemen in wipers, and willing brakemen

in clerks. Every superintendent believes that he is the best judge of

men on the pike. On every system are probably men who can give him

cards and spades, picked coal and treated water, and then outclass him

on such a run. If we leave the hiring to the different trainmasters,

master mechanics, or agents, we may have mostly the Irish on one

division, mostly the Dutch on another. If we are going into this civil

service business and are taking men, like Federal judges, for life or

during good behavior, let's have a long list of waiting eligibles

recruited for each division. Let's send around periodically a car with

an examining board from central headquarters to size up the talent

recommended by local officials. Put experienced officials, a surgeon

and an oculist on the committee. Show your trainmaster that men who

make it a business have more time than he to keep dudes and cigarette

smokers off the runboard and the payroll; that the former have broader

opportunities than he to develop a high standard of requirements. Let

the committee encourage men already employed to demonstrate their

fitness for transfer to other departments or to heavier divisions.

Let's change ends with our rail and put it where it will do the most

good. The employment bureau, the recruiting office, or the civil

service commission becomes a necessity to every large organization.

Some roads have made a start in this direction, but it is only a

start. To work out the problem will cost us money. Yes, but less than

we are being forced to pay by some of the labor contracts we have had

to sign. It is not only more graceful, it is less expensive, this

leading instead of being driven.

The great trouble seems to be in this matter of civil service that we

have tried to accomplish too much in too short a time. An industry

whose existence does not antedate the memory of men still living

cannot hope to have struck the best methods already. Yet it can be too

cautious in building Chinese walls around its organization. What we

have been striving for is to cultivate a company spirit, to improve

the efficiency of the service. We have felt that the way to do this is

to make our men feel secure in their positions, to have them convinced

that the shakeup made by our advent is the last they will ever

experience. Have we not chased this rainbow long enough? Should we not

back up and draw some of the spikes we have put in the connection

switches? It is one thing to sit in an office and figure that the

importation of this one man ought not to make anybody uneasy. It is

quite another to make the thousands of men along the road believe that

we can stick to the original package. Blood is thicker than water and

the new man will have his relatives and his followers or the followers

of his friends. If he is too thin-skinned, fear of criticism may

prevent his bringing in some new talent that would be of real benefit

to his road. He is blamed if he does and blamed if he doesn't.

Whichever course he pursues there remains, in greater or less degree,

that uncertainty which is so demoralizing. Remove this uncertainty,

let men know definitely what to expect, and you are over the hill and

closer to the terminal.

The old-fashioned rule of promote two and hire one worked mighty well

on some roads for conductors and enginemen. In these days of larger

systems the ratio might be changed to three or four or even five or

six to one. If it were definitely understood that every so often, say

every fifth vacancy in certain grades of officials and employes, a man

would certainly be selected from outside the service, I believe that

we could remove the feeling of uncertainty. We would in a large

measure attain the result we have thus far missed. We would build up

organizations with enough fresh blood to stand the test of time.

Brains and adaptability are not a natural monopoly. God Almighty

hasn't given any road a New Jersey charter broad enough for

incorporating a trust of the most efficient men. No, I am not a

populist or a socialist. I believe in trusts. They have come to stay

and ultimately to benefit the masses. Legislation will no more succeed

in destroying them than it did in preventing partnerships in England

where centuries ago it was thought for two men to unite as partners in

business was an unsafe combination of power. Education comes by hard

knocks and probably anti-merger decisions are worth the inconvenience

that they have caused. The sober sense of the American people will

tell them after a while that in attempting constitutional and

legislative interference they have not benefited themselves one

dollar. They will learn that forcing a change of methods does not

necessarily bring about a different result. They will learn that in

the long run they, the people, are the losers when good capital is

tied up; that they pay the price for unwise competition. The

railroads, the first great trusts, should be early to realize that

some conditions inherently forbid the elimination of competition. Our

prairies are too broad for an agricultural trust. The range of the

human mind is too great for any railroad to patent the ability of its

men.

This trust freight seems to make you full tonnage without cleaning out

all the rush stuff in my yard. You may cut off ahead of the rest of

the civil service loads and I will have a pony set on your caboose

when you pull through the ladder. Yes, I will tell the operator at the

yard office to scratch them off your consist. I shall have to run

another section and fill out with some cars of company material which

the construction department is kicking about. Please put up--excuse

me, display--signals until the dispatcher can get hold of you at the

end of the double track. By the way, if instead of "will display

signals, etc.," his order should read, "will signal, etc.," would it

not be shorter and, including flags, lamps, whistle and voice, be more

comprehensive?

Affectionately, your own

D. A. D.

LETTER XV.

MORE ON CIVIL SERVICE.

June 26, 1904.

My Dear Boy:--We were speaking of railroad civil service, so called.

As I told you before, our civil service is so far from the genuine

article that I always feel like qualifying the term in some way for

fear of being called in on the carpet for failure to cut the proper

duplex. It is a great big subject, worthy of the most serious

consideration, because it concerns men, not machines. Furthermore, it

is a high type of man with whom we deal or should deal. We are all so

busy that we say we concern ourselves with results. We all butt in too

much on details, usually along the line of our early training. Yet,

withal, we overlook some pretty long shots because we flatter

ourselves we are too busy to place small bets.

Even after we have wasted so much of the building season that we give

the contractor a bonus to rush the new line to completion in time to

hold the charter, wouldn't it pay us to have a care as to the kind of

men we let him work on our right of way? Next year, when the grievance

committees come up from the new division, we make them feel that it

means something, it gives them a stamp of honor to work for our

system. Why not begin a little farther back? Why not hook up in the

beginning so that our different departments can get busy early in the

game? Let the people who are to settle the new country help build and

maintain the road. Let the immigration agent camp with the

reconnoitering engineer. When the latter comes back to locate or

retrace, let the former be interesting colonies. Let our own

organization follow the surveyor's flag. Let's be our own contractor

and get back more of the money he disburses. Why let a floating gang

of Dagoes take so big a bunch of it back to sunny Italy? Why not spend

it ourselves so that its recipients will use it to develop the country

and hurry the origination of traffic? Let's handle this coin both

going and coming and cut out some of the empty haul.

The political revolutions in continental Europe and the famine in

Ireland in 1848 brought to this country a high class of immigrants. We

gave them work and schools. They helped build the railroads. Some

continued on the roads after construction; others helped develop the

surrounding country. Our flag made them free, and when civil war came

they were among the bravest of its defenders. To-day their children

and their children's children, all Americans, rank high among railway

officials and employes. Perhaps all this is a happen so; perhaps much

of it is due to big, brainy men whose policies were not narrowed by

specialization in departments. We are now doing little new

construction. We should do it better than ever and in the full sense

of the word. Is it enough to pass it up to the construction

department?

Did it ever strike you that there may be many good reasons why both

officials and employes may desire to transfer to another road? A young

man, feeling the home nest too full, the local demand for skilled

labor too light, has struck out for a newer country. He makes good. We

find him in after years running an engine, working a trick, or,

perchance, holding down an official job. Death occurs at the old home.

Marriage brings new interests in another country. An invalid member of

his family needs a change of climate. An unexpected development of a

chance investment in a remote locality demands occasional personal

attention. The orphaned children of a relative claim his protection.

Any one of a dozen praiseworthy motives may prompt him to make a

change, provided he can continue to derive his main support from the

calling to which he has found himself adapted.

Would he be able to transfer without beginning over again at the

bottom? Between the civil service of the companies and the seniority

of the brotherhoods he would find it like making a link and pin

coupling on the inside of a sharp curve. He would be lucky if he could

get a regular job on another division of the same system. Let him

persist in suggestions as to how the matter may be brought about, and

the average official, hidebound by precedent, will consider him nutty,

a candidate for the crazy house instead of for another run. Who is the

loser? Not only the man, but the company, which should have the

benefit of his wider experience, of his peculiar interest in its

territory, of the infusion of fresh blood which his advent would mean.

Suppose an official has resigned for any good personal reason, or

because he couldn't reduce the size of the engine nozzles fast enough

to suit a new management. When he starts out to hunt a job his

brethren of the profession receive him with sympathy. They promise to

help him out. Each begs him to understand how impossible it is for him

to catch the pay car on that particular line. Perhaps his informant

has been on that company's payroll only six months himself, but he

waxes eloquent on the benefits of civil service, on the desirability

of making their own men, of overcoming previous demoralization. This

would be amusing if it were not a serious business. Each seems to

flatter himself that he got aboard because of peculiar personal

fitness, and inferentially denies such attribute of genius in the man

on the outside. As a matter of fact, the recognition of outside talent

is usually a consequence of acquaintance, of happening to know the

right man at the right time, of having previously worked with the

appointing official. All this contains too much of the element of

chance. When we reserve certain vacancies for men outside of the

breastworks and select them in advance we shall get better results.

We have made our civil service frogs so stiff that our discipline has

climbed the rail. We know it is so hard for a conductor or an

engineman to get a job that we sometimes hesitate too long before we

make an example for the good of the service by discharging a flagrant

offender. If we knew that by and by he could hit on some road the

vacancy reserved for outsiders we would have the benefit of the

change. The man would learn a lesson, would not be debarred from his

occupation, and would give better service on another road. Talk with

your employes about this and you will be astonished to find how many

will fall in with this idea of leaving open a door of hope by filling

just so many vacancies with outside men.

Your official or your employe seeking a transfer or hunting a job will

be impressed with the fact that all assistance rendered will be with a

view to favoring him because he is a good, worthy fellow. He will not

hear it put on the ground that any company is fortunate to have his

services, that his future employers are being especially considered.

If he has known from boyhood the territory and civilization where he

desires to work, it will not be urged as a special qualification.

Right here is where the most of us fall down. We too seldom make our

subordinates feel that we are the gainers by having them in our

employ. We are too likely to make them feel they are lucky to have a

job. This may do for the indifferent men, but it puts no premium on

superior ability and loyalty. It renders a discharge, when made, less

effective as an example. You cannot treat all your men alike in all

things. In a few things, collisions, stealing, booze-fighting, for

example, you have to do so. In most things you must avoid destroying

individuality. You must build up personal pride in each. Even sister

engines of the same type do not steam or pull exactly alike. Man, made

in the image of Deity, has pride, brains and courage to make more

complex his disposition. Corporations have no souls. Railroad men have

souls and good red blood. Their intelligence is an inspiration; their

steadfastness, a psalm.

Affectionately, your own

D. A. D.

LETTER XVI.

THE SUPPLY TRAIN.

July 3, 1904.

My Dear Boy:--Blacksmiths' horses and shoemakers' wives proverbially

go unshod. A railroad puts up its poorest sample of transportation in

the routine handling of its own material and supplies. Company stuff

is moved and handled last of all; and probably at maximum expense. For

example, if we wish to ship a car of wheels to division headquarters

we load them after we are lucky enough to get an available car. Then

after proper billing authority has been furnished we go through some

more red tape, so that the auditor may not confuse figs with thistles,

revenue producers with deadheads. When we happen to have a train with

such light tonnage that all excuses for moving the car have been

exhausted it reaches the yard nearest its destination. The master

mechanic's office in a day or two has pounded sufficiently at the

yardmaster to get the car set, usually several hours after it has been

promised. It is not of record just how much time and money have been

wasted by the mechanical department through not having the car when

expected.

If our administration is unusually smooth we may be able to load our

scrap wheels on this same car. Usually, however, we wait until the car

has been hauled down the line before some office away off somewhere

gives disposition for the wornout material. Or, having unloaded all

the wheels, we wait until next week before we order in another car,

and go through the same performance to ship a couple of pairs to some

junction point on the same division. I will not bore you with the

expensive details of getting a car of ties loaded and distributed, of

how much time the sectionmen are worked to poor advantage because the

car or material failed to show up when expected.

We, mounted on wheels, with transportation as our chief asset, let our

own business get it where the chicken felt the axe, where the sharp

flange caught the bum. It used to be more comfortable in the old days.

We could have the sectionmen do so many jobs without its seeming to

cost anything. The fact that we have learned better makes me rash

enough to believe that we may yet progress beyond thinking that some

of our own transportation costs little or nothing because we do it

with the local freight or a switch engine. We haul a car clear over

the division to pick up a few pounds of scrap paper; provided, of

course, the agents have not confused the day with that for loading

dairy line shipments. The weakness in handling company material

naturally leads to a distrust by other departments and a desire by

each to control the distribution of its own supplies.

Did you ever think in what a haphazard, hit or miss manner we handle

our traveling workers? The scale inspector is a very necessary

individual because freight revenue is a function of weight. He is so

valuable to us that, although the test car is a nuisance in trains and

yards, we haul him hundreds of miles to do a few minutes' or a few

hours' work. If he should try to do any other company business; if he

should repair furniture, solicit traffic, inspect ties or examine

interlocking plants, he would infringe on the prerogatives of other

men who earn salaries by riding much and working little. Yes, I know

we must have departments. Our great task is to work them to the best

advantage; to let them overlap a little when business is dull, or

where local conditions permit. We should switch our departments

together so that we can cut in the air on enough to hold the train

without going after expenses with a club.

The employe who does not receive supplies regularly, whose

requisitions for stationery are arbitrarily cut, will try to get

enough ahead to keep himself from running out. When you take an

inventory you must figure on removing the temptation for everyone to

hold back full returns for fear of not rendering good service in the

future. With a lot of money tied up in supplies at central or division

storehouses our service often suffers, even accidents occur for want

of a lantern globe, or a few gallons of oil. The average local freight

crew has no more compunctions in replenishing the caboose from a can

of oil consigned to a country agent than did the slave in taking

chickens. It all belongs to the company. Massa's chicken, massa's

niggah. Some roads are now distributing oil to sections and to small

stations from a box car fitted with inside tanks and self-registering

pumps, a very economical arrangement. This car runs on the local

freight at fixed times. The next step has been to put with it supply

cars, handled by the oil man, who issues supplies and tools to agents,

section foremen and pumpers. A stationery car comes next in the

outfit. This progressive development is hampered in most cases by

adherence to the time-honored requisition. It does not promote a good

company spirit in an agent to haul by him a car filled with supplies

and deny him a much-needed broom, a comfort-giving pane of glass,

simply because a requisition has not passed through the prescribed

number of chief clerks' office baskets. Issues are for the good of the

service, not for charity. The best way is to require a division

official to accompany the cars on his division, hold him responsible,

and make his check good on our traveling bank. Let the employe sign on

a line in a book for articles received, just as an agent receipts to

an express messenger, and let the official countersign once for all

the employes on a page. Then you have the economy and benefits of

centralization without the demoralizing interference with local

administration.

The supply cars are only a beginning. The evolution must be a supply

and inspection train run exclusively for company business, and to do

every practicable kind of company business. It should supply every

department and pick up the surplus and scrap in each. It should run

over as many divisions as feasible, giving it time to return and

restock so as to cover its territory at prescribed intervals, say

every thirty or sixty days. This train should be manned by monthly

company men, preferably of the semi-official class. The position of

fireman should be part of the course of a special apprentice. If no

special apprentice is available for engineman, use the man in mind for

the next vacancy as road foreman. Let the scale inspector be the

flagman. For conductor have a coming trainmaster, not afraid to pull

off his coat to help adjust a scale or to unload a keg of track

spikes. Have an ambitious brakeman for train clerk, whose records

would replace requisitions and waybilling. For pilot use the

superintendent, the trainmaster, the chief dispatcher, the master

mechanic, the road foreman, the division engineer, or the supervisor.

Have as many as possible of those last named accompany the train and

give the division a rigid inspection. Pretty soon you would find the

general superintendent frequently hitching his car to this train. Put

the contents of the train in charge of a high-class traveling

storekeeper. On the ground the employe would indicate his

requirements, the division official would recommend, and the traveling

storekeeper, closely in touch with the management and its policies,

would take final action. Whatever happened to be done, it would be

right up to date, and in accordance with existing needs. Arriving at a

roundhouse, the train itself would spot a car of wheels and a car of

oil, taking care to reload scrap wheels and empty oil barrels. In

general do not issue a new article unless an unserviceable one is

turned in. The recollections of those present will make fresher the

record of expendable articles issued on a previous trip. Long range

requisitions, approved by distant authority, may result in false

economy, in a lack of clearly defined responsibility. The essence of

good administration consists in dealing with men and things, in giving

them greater value than their paper symbols. If love for requisitions

should still linger in the official breast, the proprieties of such

chaste affection could be preserved by going through all the forms

until their absurdity is fully demonstrated.

The supply train should have a car fitted up as a workshop in which a

handy man could repair station trucks, office chairs, lanterns, switch

lamps, etc., etc., and save shipping many miles for a new part. Many

tools and utensils would last longer if, in some such way, they could

receive the stitch in time that saves nine. Prompt repair and

interchange among various points should diminish investment in reserve

supply. An article should not have to be returned to the place where

previously used. Under present methods the return journey may put it

in worse shape than when first sent in. When repaired it should be

issued wherever it will do the most good.

Another car in the supply train should be a laboratory in charge of

the superintendent of tests or his representative, whose office would

thus get more closely in touch with division officials and with

service conditions. The scrap car, with its broken side rods, its

worn-out shovels, its twisted drills, might mean a whole lot in

connection with arbitrary theoretical tests.

With the train, on stated trips, should be the employment bureau. Pick

up candidates, haul them over the division. Talk with them, note their

adaptability in strange surroundings, see of how promising a stretch

is the rubber in their necks. Give them transportation back home and,

if desired, tell them to report again next trip for further

examination.

When your supply train has to tie up away from a night roundhouse, let

the crew take short turns as watchmen. Incidentally the train might

serve as an object lesson as to the endurance and capacity of men, the

length of runs, and the care of an engine. If your labor contracts do

not permit you to man your own train, do the necessary toward an

amendment of such unwise schedules.

The more you think of the increased efficiency of the service, of the

ultimate economy, of the smoother administration, the more you will

cuddle up to the notion of a company train. Experience will show the

wisdom or unwisdom of numerous details that will suggest themselves. I

have given you only an outline with a few samples of methods to be

pursued. I want you to think out the rest for yourself. It is theory

to-day, but the theory of to-day is the forerunner of practice a few

years hence.

Affectionately, your own

D. A. D.

LETTER XVII.

WHAT THE BIG ENGINE HAS COST.

July 10, 1904.

Letters from an Old Railway Official to His Son, a Division Superintendent · 第 4 / 7 段