Polish carpets

Another interesting class of very fine pile carpets that has also become

known comparatively recently to collectors is the so-called Polish

carpets, generally made of silk pile for the ornament, which is

distinctively Oriental, and of gold and silver thread textile for the

ground, very much after the manner of early 17th-century Brusa fabrics.

Many of these carpets are in the Czartoryski collection at Cracow. They

are discussed by Dr Bode in his treatise on Oriental carpets already

referred to. European coats of arms of the persons for whom they were

made are often introduced into them, sometimes different in workmanship

from that of the carpets, though there are specimens in which the

workmanship is the same throughout. The details of their designs consist

for the most part of arabesques and long curved serrated leaves similar

to such as are commonly used in Rhodian pottery decoration of the 16th

century, though more typical of those so frequent in 17th-century

Turkish ornament. Various considerations lead to the conclusion that

these so-called Polish carpets were probably made in either

Constantinople or Damascus (_tapete Damaschini_ frequently occur in

Venetian inventories of the 16th century) rather than, as has been

thought, by the Persian workmen employed at the Mazarski silk factory

which lasted for a short period only during the 18th century at Sleucz

in Poland.

Carpets made in France.

The European carpet manufactory, of which a continuous history for some

two hundred and fifty years is recorded with exceptional completeness,

is that which has been maintained under successive regimes, royal,

imperial and republican, in France--at the Hotel des Gobelins in Paris.

Seventy years before its organization under Colbert in 1667 as a state

manufactory (_Manufacture Royale des Meubles de la Couronne_), Henry IV.

had founded royal art workshops for all sorts of decorative work, at the

Louvre; and here in 1604 a workroom was established for making Oriental

carpets by the side of that which existed for making _tapis flamands_.

In 1610 letters patent were granted to the Sieur Fortier, who has been

reputed to be the first inventor in France of the art of making in silk

and wool real Turkey and other piled carpets with grounds of gold

thread, which must have been sumptuous fabrics probably resembling the

so-called Polish carpets of this date. Some ten years later it is

recorded that Pierre Dupont and Simon Lourdet started a pile carpet

(_tapis veloutes_) manufactory at Chaillot (Paris) in large premises

which had been used for the manufacture of soap--whence the name of

"Savonnerie." To this converted manufactory were transferred in 1631 the

carpet-makers from the Louvre, and under the direct patronage of the

crown it continued its operations for many years at Chaillot. It was not

until 1828 that the making of _tapis de la Savonnerie_ (pile carpets of

a fine velvety character) was transferred to the Hotel des Gobelins.

Here, in contradistinction to the Savonnerie, carpets are made others

which, like those of Beauvais (where a manufactory of hangings and

carpets was established by Colbert in 1664), are _tapis ras_ or

non-piled carpets, being of tapestry-weaving, as also are those made by

old-established firms at Aubusson and at Felletin, where the manufacture

was flourishing, at the former place in 1732 and at the latter in 1737.

Returning now to England, there are evidences towards the end of the

17th century, if not earlier, that Walloon and Flemish makers of Turkey

pile carpets had settled and set up works in different parts of the

country. A protective charter, for instance, was granted in 1701 by

William III. to weavers in Axminster and Wilton. The ultimate celebrity

of the pile carpet industry at Wilton was due mainly to the interest

taken in it during the earlier part of the 18th century by Henry, earl

of Pembroke and Montgomery, who in the course of his travels abroad

collected certain French and Walloon carpet-makers to work for him in

Wiltshire--over them he put two Frenchmen, Antoine Dufossy and Pierre

Jemale. More notable, however, than these is Pere Norbert, who

naturalized himself as an Englishman, changed his name to Parisot, and

started a manufactory of pile carpets and a training school in the craft

at Fulham about 1751. In 1753 he wrote and published "An account of the

new manufactory of Tapestry after the manner of that at the Gobelins,

and of carpets after the manner of that at Chaillot (i.e. Savonnerie)

now undertaken at Fulham by Mr Peter Parisot." Two refugee French

carpet-makers from the Savonnerie had arrived in London in 1750, and

started weaving a specimen carpet in Westminster. Parisot, having found

them out, induced the duke of Cumberland to furnish funds for their

removal to better workrooms at Paddington. The carpet when finished was

presented by the duke to the princess dowager of Wales. Parisot

quarrelled with his two employees, enticed others to come over, and then

removed the carpet works from Paddington to Fulham. A worker, J.

Baptiste Grignon, writing to "Mr Parisot in Foulleme Manufactory,"

mentions the marked preference "shown by the English court for velvet,"

and how much a "chair-back he had worked in the manner of the Savonnerie

had been admired." Correspondence published in the _Nouvelles Archives

de l'art francais_ (1878) largely relates to the efforts of the French

government to stop the emigration to England of workers from the

Gobelins and the Savonnerie. Parisot's Fulham works were sold up in

1755. He then tried to start a manufactory at Exeter, but apparently

without success, as in 1756 his Exeter stock was sold in the Great

Piazza auction rooms, Covent Garden. Joseph Baretti (Dr Johnson's

friend), writing from Plymouth on the 18th of April 1760, alludes to his

having that morning visited the Exeter manufactory of _tapisseries de

Gobelins_ "founded by a distinguished anti-Jesuit--the renowned Father

Nobert." Previously to this a Mr Passavant of Exeter[4] had received in

1758 a premium from the Society of Arts of London for making a carpet in

"imitation of those brought from the East and called Turky carpets."

Similar premiums had been awarded by the society in 1757 to a Mr Moore

of Chiswell Street, Moorfields, and to a Mr Whitty of Axminster. In 1759

a society's premium was won by Mr Jeffer of Frome. In the _Transactions

of the Society_, vol. i., dated 1783, it is stated that by their

rewards, the manufacture of "Turky carpets is now established in

different parts of the kingdom, and brought to a degree of elegance and

beauty which the Turky carpets never attained." Such records as these

convey a fair notion of the sporadic attempts which immediately preceded

a systematic manufacture of pile carpets in this country. Whilst the

Wilton industry survived, that actually carried on at Axminster died

towards the end of the 18th century, and the name of Axminster like that

of Savonnerie carpets now perpetuates the memory of a locally deceased

manufactory, much as in a parallel way Brussels carpets seem to owe

their name to the renown of Brussels as an important centre in the 15th

and 16th centuries for tapestry-weaving.

Modern machinery.

Before the existence of steam-driven carpet-making machinery in England,

employers, following the example set by the French, applied the Jacquard

apparatus, for regulating and facilitating the weaving of patterns, to

the hand manufacture of carpets. This was early in the 19th century; a

great acceleration in producing English carpets occurred, severely

threatening the industry as pursued (largely for _tapis ras_) at Tournai

in Belgium, at Nimes, Abbeville, Aubusson, Beauvais, Tourcoing and

Lannoy in France. The severity of the competition, however, was still

more increased when English enterprise, developing the inventions of

Erastus B. Bigelow (1814-1879) of America and Mr William Wood of

England, took the lead in perfecting Jacquard weaving carpet looms

worked by steam, which resulted in the setting up of many power-loom

carpet manufactories in the United Kingdom. It was not until 1880 that

French pile carpet manufacturers began to adopt similar carpet

power-looms, importing them from England.

These machines for weaving pile carpets, either looped (_boucle_) as in

Brussels, or cut (_veloute_) as in Wilton or Axminster carpets, were

similar in all respects to such as had been in use by the important

English manufacturers--Crossley of Halifax, Templeton of Glasgow,

Humphreys of Kidderminster, Southwell of Bridgnorth, and others. A

so-called tapestry carpet weaving-loom was invented by Richard Whytock

of Edinburgh in 1832, but it was not brought to sufficient completeness

for sustained manufacture until 1855. The essential feature of Mr

Whytock's process was that the warp-threads were dyed and

parti-coloured, in such a way that when woven the several points of

colour formed the pattern of the whole fabric. Although the name

"tapestry" is used, the texture of these wares has but a remote likeness

to that of hand-made tapestry hangings and carpets such as those of the

Gobelins and Aubusson manufactories, nor is it the same as the texture

of Brussels carpets. Machine-made tapestry carpets are also called

"ingrain" carpets, because the wool or worsted is dyed in the grain,

i.e. before manufacture. Germany in her manufacture of carpets resorts

chiefly to the "ingrain" process, but in common with Holland and Belgium

she produces pile (looped and cut) carpets from power-looms. In the

United States of America there are many similar and very important

carpet manufactories; and Austria produces fine cut pile carpets

(_veloutes_), the designs of which are largely derived from those of the

Aubusson tapestry-woven carpets (_tapis ras_).

Lengths or pieces of felt and other substantial material are frequently

made for floor and stair carpeting, and are often printed with patterns.

These of course come into quite another class technically. The

technological aspects of the several branches of carpet manufacture by

machinery are treated in the articles on TEXTILE-PRINTING and WEAVING.

Briefly, the products of carpet manufacture practically fall into three

main divisions: (1) Pile carpets (_tapis moquettes_) which are either

looped (_boucle_) or cut (_veloute_); (2) flat surface carpets (_tapis

ras_) as in hand tapestry-woven material; and (3) printed stuffs used

for carpeting.

Modern hand-made carpets.

Whilst the production of carpets by steam power predominates in Europe

and the United States of America, and at one time appeared to be giving

the _coup de grace_ to the craft of making carpets by hand, there has

been in recent times a revival in this latter, and many carpets of

characteristic modern design, several of them made in England, are due

to the influence of the late William Morris, who devoted much of his

varied energies to tapestry weaving and pile carpet weaving by hand,

both of which crafts are being fostered as cottage industries in parts

of Ireland, as well as in England. At the same time leading English

carpet manufactures continue to produce hand-made carpets as occasion

requires. In France a much more systematic existence of tapestry weaving

and pile carpet making by hand has been maintained and is of course

attributable to the perennial activity of the state tapestry works in

Paris (at the Gobelins workshops) and in Beauvais, and of corresponding

works managed by private enterprise at Aubusson and elsewhere.

Designing patterns for English carpet manufacture is now more organized

than it was, and greater thought and invention are given to devising

ornament suitable to the purpose of floor coverings. Before 1850 and for

a few years later, rather rude realistic representations of animals and

botanical forms (decadent versions of Savonnerie designs) were often

wrought in rugs and carpets, and survivals of these are still to be met

with, but the lessons that have been subsequently derived from

intelligent study of Oriental designs have resulted in the definite

designing of conventional forms for surface patterns. The early movement

in this direction owes much to the teaching of Owen Jones, and in its

later and rather freer phases the Morris influence has been powerful.

Schools of art at Glasgow, at Manchester, Birmingham and elsewhere in

the United Kingdom have trained and continue to train designers, whose

work has contributed to the formation of an English style with a new

note, which, as a French writer puts it, has created a sensation in

France, in Germany, in fact in all Europe and America.

France retains that facility of execution and liveliness in invention

which have been nurtured for over three hundred years by systematic,

governmental solicitude for education in decorative design and

enterprise in perfecting manufacture. Her Aubusson and Savonnerie

carpets have maintained a style of design in form and colour entirely

different from any that clearly throws back to Oriental principles, and

many of the designs for the finer and larger of these carpets are

schemed with large central oval panels, garlands of flowers and

fantastic frames very much on the plan of what is frequently to be seen

in the decoration of ceilings. At the same time the style called _l'art

nouveau_ has become developed. It largely grows from very fanciful

dispositions of free-growing natural forms, as well as curiously curved

and tenuous forms, many of which are bone-like and fibre-like in

character, flat in treatment and rather thin and washy in colour, and

its influence has slightly percolated into designs for pile carpets.

This style, sometimes intermixed with the more robust, less fantastic

and rather fuller-coloured English style, has found followers in

England, America and Germany, but the bulk of the designs now used in

power carpet looms seems to be mainly of Oriental descent.

The more important art museums in Europe contain collections of Oriental

carpets, and the history of many is fairly well established. The subject

has become one of serious study, the results of which have been

published and elucidated by means of well-executed coloured

reproductions of carpets and rugs preserved in both public and private

collections.

Encyclopaedia Britannica, 11th Edition, "Carnegie Andrew" to "Casus Belli" Volume 5, Slice 4 · 第 16 / 43 题