ART. V.--AUTO-BIOGRAPHY OF THIEVES.

1.--_The American Trenck; or the Memoirs of Thomas Ward, now in

confinement in the Baltimore Jail, under a sentence of ten years'

imprisonment for robbing the United States Mail._ Baltimore. 18mo: 1829.

2.--_Memoirs of James Hardy Vaux, a Swindler and Thief, now transported

to New South Wales, for the second time, and for life. Written by

himself._ London. 18mo: 1829.

3.--_Memoirs of Vidocq, principal Agent of the French Police, until_

1827, _and since, Proprietor of the Paper Manufactory at St. Maude.

Written by himself. Translated from the French._ London. 4 vols. 18mo:

1829.

"One half of the world does not know how the other half lives:"--so says

the adage, and says truly. Men of reading, however, who direct their

attention to biography, and especially to auto-biography, and who

combine with their reading attention to the varied pursuits of mankind,

may attain tolerably correct notions of the habits, modes of reasoning,

and peculiarities of others, though living in evidently different

stations, and engaged in occupations the most various. In this view, the

volumes above announced are valuable. They furnish a remarkably clear

insight of the ways and actings of professional thieves, and of the men

with whom they often become connected,--police officers and jailers. But

what assurance have we, it may be inquired, that they speak the truth?

How can the evidence of such characters be received? These queries must

be answered by considering several particulars. In the first place,

then, the verity of a narrative may be partly established by its

coherence and probability. When the events related have a manifest

correspondence with each other, and are such as may be credited, we

necessarily attach to them a degree of belief, which we cannot extend to

those of an opposite character. The evidence from this source is,

however, exceedingly imperfect, since many narratives, almost entirely

fictitious, appear so natural, as to impose upon the reader with all the

strength of unvarnished truth. Robinson Crusoe has deceived thousands,

and Damberger's Travels in Africa were not suspected to be otherwise

than true, for a considerable time after their publication; but they

were at length proved to be a complete fabrication. Accordingly, in

judging of doubtful works, we must resort to additional means; one of

which is a comparison of works of a similar description with each other.

When an account appears to be too wonderful for credence, we are, of

course, disposed to rank the author with romance-writers; but when we

find that divers accounts, equally extraordinary, are related by others

as happening under similar circumstances, we then begin to suppose that

we may have judged erroneously. Captain Riley's Narrative of his

Captivity in Africa was rejected by many as half-fictitious: his

sufferings were greater than human nature could bear, and the Arabs of

the desert could never lead the life described. But since it has been

found that the sufferings undergone by the crew of the French frigate,

the Medusa, were no less horrible, and of the same kind, and that

Clapperton and others who have subsequently crossed the Sahara,

confirmed his statements respecting the Arabs,--he has been regarded

very differently. And it may be supposed, that if Sir Walter Scott had

known of the remarkable confirmation given by Benyouski, to Drury's

account of Madagascar, he would not have expressed his doubts of the

latter's veracity.[12] When writers, unacquainted with each other's

productions, are found, by incidental allusions, to agree in minute

particulars, the evidence is almost irrefutable. Paley has made an

admirable use of this species of proof in his _Horae Paulinae_.

Another mode of judging of an author's credibility is sometimes

furnished, by learning whether any of his alleged facts have been

contradicted by persons acquainted with them, especially if they are

such as these persons would be glad to contradict. If a person is

charged with being an accomplice in a crime, and he fails to rebut the

accusation, we may infer that he is unable to do so. Or, if the narrator

give place and date to certain memorable transactions, which, if false,

might easily be shown to be so, a similar inference may be deduced, when

it can be shown that others are interested in such exposure.

Now, on bringing the works under notice to these different tests, we

shall have tolerably strong presumptive evidence of their being, in the

main, worthy of credence. Vaux's Memoirs contain nothing that may not be

credited on the score of probability, while the circumstances detailed

are remarkably coherent; they seem to arise naturally from each other.

Vidocq's, on the contrary, contain so many marvellous escapes from

prisons, so many perils from contests with ruffians and bravoes, and

such varied turns of fortune, that the reader is necessitated to

ask,--can this be true? Here, however, both Vaux and Ward offer him some

assistance; the similarity of their accounts, though destitute of so

many wonders, corroborating the probability of his. The three narratives

are quite in keeping. We find in each the same restlessness, the same

blind passion impelling to deeds of vice and desperation, and the same

proofs of treachery amongst their companions. Each, too, has furnished

so many means of detection, by names of persons, dates, and places,

that,--no attempt at refutation having been made by persons

implicated,--we are to believe that they must, at any rate, contain much

that is true. Neither Ward's nor Vidocq's Memoirs are so connected as

Vaux's; but in Ward's case, this may be attributed to a want of

scholarship, as he is evidently an ignorant man; and in Vidocq's, to a

fondness for the marvellous, in consequence of which he has introduced

many episodes. These episodes, accordingly, detract from the merit of

the work, considered as a veritable narrative, they being garnished with

more of the romantic than the regular account of his own performances.

After all, a degree of suspicion will attach to each of them, from the

consideration that they are all avowed liars. If, indeed, there was

proof, either external or internal, that they had become reformed

characters, and, of course, abhorrers of deceit, we might value their

self-condemnation as evidence of truth; for what man of moral feeling

would proclaim that he had been an habitual liar, except conscious that

the avowal was incumbent on him to substantiate the truth? This was done

by Bunyan, the author of the Pilgrim's Progress, and by Cowper, the

truly Christian poet:--they are respected accordingly. But in these

narratives, except a little cant in Ward's, we find nothing approaching

to a sense of shame or remorse. Vidocq, like Homer's Ulysses, has a lie

ready for every occasion, and appears, like that hero, to regard himself

as "the man for wisdom's various arts renowned." Vaux is almost equal to

him in this respect, and exults in the success of his deceptions. If

cunning were wisdom, Ulysses, Vidocq, and Vaux, would form a trio of

eminently wise men. But this sort of wisdom, how much soever valued by

pagans, must be regarded by Christians, enlightened by the Gospel, as

utterly unjustifiable, even when employed as a means for the attainment

of some good; since they are never to do evil that good may come.

Accordingly, those persons who make lies their refuge, must be liable to

be doubted, even when they speak the truth. Still, it is possible, that

a man's conscience may be so obdurate, as not to perceive the pravity of

mendacity, when exercised for his supposed benefit, while he yet retains

a regard for truth when engaged in relating his exploits to others.

This, we think, is partly the case with our heroes. Their acknowledgment

of their disregard of truth, while prosecuting illegal measures, is,

indeed,--so inconsistent is human nature,--some guarantee for the

fidelity of their narratives. A solitary vice is a thing unknown; as

Lillo expresses it, in his tragedy of George Barnwell,--"One vice as

naturally begets another, as a father begets a son." Who, then, could

believe a practised villain, if he professed himself untainted by

mendacity? But if, after a plain avowal of his constant resort to it, we

find nothing contradictory in his relation, we may reasonably yield a

qualified assent to it; since, as Lord Bacon remarks in his Essays,

which "come home to men's business and bosoms," a liar had need possess

a good memory to prevent his contradicting himself. Where he is

consistent throughout a long narrative, the natural deduction is, that

he has mainly depended on his memory, rejecting, for the occasion, his

temptation to beguile.[13]

After these preliminary considerations, the relevancy of which is

obvious, we proceed to furnish our readers with a few extracts; not

doubting, that to such of them as lead domestic, retired lives, it will

afford gratification to learn something of the ways of others, who are

entirely opposite in their habits,--as opposite as the two electric

poles, and, like them, "repelling and repelled." One of the most

observable points in these volumes, is the contamination of jails. When

men are thrown together in a place where reputation is valueless, they

have no inducement to conceal their vices. What is the consequence? They

delight in recounting to each other their nefarious exploits: thus

conscience is more and more corrupted, and the young and inexperienced

are initiated into the skilful manoeuvres of adepts. Whoever has read

the _first_ edition of Ellwood's Life, (for the subsequent editions do

not contain the passage,) may remember the amusing account he has given

of the state of the common side of Newgate in the reign of Charles II.

Ellwood was imprisoned in that persecuting reign, for adherence to his

religious convictions as a Quaker, and had an opportunity of becoming

acquainted with the ordinary behaviour and conversation of thieves in

jail. He saw and lamented the evils incident to a promiscuous assemblage

of old and young, of hardened villains and juvenile delinquents; but the

remedy was reserved for the present age. That the remedy ought not to

have been so long deferred, will be evident to every one who attends to

Vaux's account of his first incarceration.

"On entering the gates of the gloomy receptacle to which I was

now consigned, and which, on many accounts, has not been

unaptly named the Bastile, the sensations I felt may be more

easily felt than described. Besides that this was the first

prison I had ever entered, every thing around me had an air of

unspeakable horror. After being viewed and reviewed by the

surly Cerberuses of this earthly Hell, I was conducted up some

stairs to a long gallery, or passage, six feet wide, having on

either side a number of dismal cells, each about six feet by

nine, formed entirely of stone, but having a small grated

window near the roof, at the further end, which admitted a

gloomy light, and overlooked a yard, in which other prisoners

were confined; there was also a similar grate over the door;

but, owing to their height, both these apertures were very

difficult of access. The cells on the other side the passage

were exactly similar, but overlooking another yard, and the

doors were immediately opposite to each other. The only

furniture of these dreary apartments was an iron bedstead, on

which were a bed, blanket, and rug, but all of the coarsest

kind. My conductor having given me a pitcher of water, without

vouchsafing a word, locked the door, and left me in utter

darkness.

"In order to amuse my mind during this solitary week, I climbed

up to the grated aperture over the door of my cell, and

listened to the conversation of the neighbouring prisoners;

and, from their discourse, I acquired a more extensive

knowledge of the various modes of fraud and robbery, which, I

now found, were reduced to a regular system, _than I should

have done in seven years, had I continued at large_. I was

indeed astonished at what I heard; and I clearly perceived

that, instead of expressing contrition for their offences,

their only consideration was, how to proceed with more safety,

but increased vigour, in their future depredations. And here I

was struck with the fallacious notions entertained by the

projectors of this prison, which was reputed to be upon the

plan of the benevolent and immortal Howard, who had recommended

the confinement of offenders in separate cells, in order to

prevent the effects of evil communication among persons who had

not all attained an equal degree of depravity. This object,

however, was not effected here; for, being within hearing of

each other, they could, by sitting up over the door as I have

described, converse each with his opposite neighbour, and even

form a line of communication, where the discourse became

general, from one end of the gallery to the other. As a proof

of what I have advanced, I knew several of the prisoners, then

confined with me in this passage, who were at that time but

striplings, and novices in villainy, and who, after several

years continuance in their evil courses, at length became

notorious offenders, and, having narrowly escaped a shameful

death, are now prisoners for life in this colony."

As this subject is of great importance, we shall give a few more

extracts connected with it. Crime, as Mr. Buxton has shown in his

valuable Inquiry, is promoted, instead of being repressed, by such

indiscriminate association. Corruption spreads by it, as surely as

decomposition is assisted by heat and moisture. Ward thus describes the

Baltimore jail:--

"About this time, I was ordered by the sheriff to be put into

the criminal apartment, along with untried prisoners, hardened

offenders, debtors, and among characters of the most abandoned

and vicious stamp;--men of all nations and all colours. Among

this mass of vile and depraved men, I had to take up my abode.

There was no example of moral rectitude here exhibited _but

that of my own_! No restraint was put by our keepers, on their

profane and vile language and conduct. Every one indulged to an

excess in every species of the most disgusting practices,

profaning and scandalizing every thing holy."

Vidocq's description of the Bagne at Brest, corresponds with the

above:--

"The Bagne is situated in the bosom of the bay; piles of guns,

and two pieces of cannon, mounted at the gates, pointed out to

me the entrance, into which I was introduced, after having been

examined by the two guards of the establishment. The boldest of

the condemned, however hardened, have confessed, that it is

impossible to express the emotions of horror, excited by the

first appearance of this abode of wretchedness. Every room

contains twenty night camp couches, called bancs (benches,) on

which lie six hundred fettered convicts, in long rows, with

red garbs, heads shorn, eyes haggard, dejected countenances,

whilst the perpetual clank of fetters conspires to fill the

soul with horror. But this impression on the convict soon

passes away, who, feeling that he has here no reason to blush

at the presence of any one, soon identifies himself with his

situation. That he may not be the butt of the gross jests and

filthy buffoonery of his fellows, he affects to participate in

them; and soon, in tone and gesture, this conventional

depravity gets hold of his heart. Thus, at Anvers, an ex-bishop

experienced, at first, all the outpourings of the riotous jests

of his companions; they always addressed him as _monseigneur_,

and asked his blessing in their obscenities; at every moment

they constrained him to profane his former character by

blasphemous words, and, by dint of reiterating these impieties,

he contrived to shake off their attacks. At a subsequent

period, he became the public-house keeper at the Bagne, and was

always styled _monseigneur,_ but he was no longer asked for

absolution, for he would have answered with the grossest

blasphemies."

To complete the picture, we shall now transcribe Vaux's account of his

being on board a prison-ship, with what he witnessed there.--

"I had now a new scene of misery to contemplate; and, of all

the shocking scenes I had ever beheld, this was the most

distressing. There were confined in this floating dungeon,

nearly six hundred men, most of them double ironed; and the

reader may conceive the horrible effects arising from the

continual rattling of chains, the filth and vermin naturally

produced by such a crowd of miserable inhabitants, the oaths

and execrations constantly heard amongst them; and above all,

from the shocking necessity of associating and communicating

more or less with so depraved a set of beings. On arriving on

board, we were all immediately stripped, and washed in large

tubs of water; then, after putting on each a suit of coarse

slop-clothing, we were ironed and sent below; our own clothes

being taken from us, and detained, till we could sell, or

otherwise dispose of them, as no person is exempted from the

obligation to wear the ship-dress. On descending the hatchway,

no conception can be formed of the scene which presented

itself. I shall not attempt to describe it; but nothing short

of a descent to the infernal regions, can be at all worthy of a

comparison with it. I soon met with many of my old Botany Bay

acquaintances, who were all eager to offer me their friendship

and services; that is, with a view to rob me of what little I

had; for, in this place, there is no other motive or subject

for ingenuity. All former friendships and connexions are

dissolved; and a man here will rob his best benefactor, or even

messmate, of an article worth one half-penny. If I were to

attempt a full description of the miseries endured in these

ships, I could fill a volume; but I shall sum up all by

stating, that, besides robbery from each other, which is as

common as cursing and swearing, I witnessed, among the

prisoners themselves, during the twelvemonth I remained with

them, one deliberate murder, for which the perpetrator was

executed at Maidstone, and one suicide."

These horrible accounts must, we suppose, convince every one of the

necessity of keeping criminals separate from each other. In vain do you

hope by classification, labour, discipline, and moral instruction, to

reclaim men from their vices in prison, so long as you allow them to

associate freely together. No compromise will do, short of preventing

their conversing with each other. Whether solitary confinement, as

practised in Pennsylvania, or public labour in silence, as in New-York,

be the better mode of punishment, may admit of argument; but that either

is incomparably superior to promiscuous intercourse, is unquestionable.

And we do conjure magistrates and legislators in every part of the

United States, to rouse themselves from apathy on this momentous

subject. It is due to their country and to posterity, to strive to

remove an evil, which, like the Upas, extends its pestiferous influence

in every direction. Let them reflect that the object of punishing

criminals is to protect society. This object may be promoted by the

reformation of the transgressor; but if he is placed in a situation

where contagion is inevitable, the punishment, however severe, is not

conducive to that result. A severe punishment may, indeed, be

influential in deterring others from pursuing similar courses; but if

he, on obtaining his release, instead of being disposed to conform to

regularity of conduct, is only determined to practise more skilfully the

very crime that was the cause of his commitment; or if, from his moral

sense being deadened, in consequence of having heard others boast of

their villainous exploits, he is ready to engage in new and more

desperate attempts, the influence which his punishment may have had on

others, is in danger of being overbalanced. What, in such a case, does

society gain by the severity of the law? Is it not clear, that all the

expense, trouble, and loss of time attendant on the prosecution, are

almost fruitlessly bestowed? And here, it is impossible not to lament

the accumulated evils arising from the slow operation of law. A man is

charged, perhaps innocently, with petty larceny. The tribunal before

which he is to be arraigned is not in session; accordingly, unable to

procure bail, he is committed to jail, there to lie for three, or

perhaps six months, and all the time uncertain whether he is to be

acquitted or condemned. In the mean time, his character has deteriorated

while his enjoyment has been abridged. Can such a method be consistent

with civilization? Would it not be preferable, at the hazard of some

injustice, to revert to the summary process of barbarism? Can it be

right, that a magistrate shall be empowered to incarcerate a man for

months, while he is debarred from pronouncing definitively on his guilt

or innocence? There is an incongruity in all this, of which savages

might be ashamed. We trust that the time is approaching when a better

system will be established. Consolatory is it to consider, that in

various countries of Europe, as well as in America, the subject of

prison discipline, and of criminal jurisprudence, occupies the attention

of philanthropists and statesmen to a degree never before witnessed, as

from their simultaneous exertions much good may be anticipated. One of

the causes assigned by Dr. Robertson and other historians, for the

resuscitation of Europe from the intellectual degradation of the middle

ages, is the discovery at Amalfi, in the twelfth century, of the

Pandects of Justinian. Would it not then be irrational to conclude, that

the improvements now taking place in law, will not be followed by a

correspondent amelioration in society, since it is obvious that a much

higher degree of civilization is attainable by man, than any country has

yet exhibited?

To those who wish for information on the subject of prison discipline,

we recommend a perusal of the correspondence between Mr. R. Vaux of

Philadelphia, and Mr. Roscoe of Liverpool; also of the account of the

Auburn prison contained in Captain Hall's travels in the United States.

In reference to the latter work, it gives us satisfaction to say, that

the chapter referred to is unexceptionable. We wish we could say as much

for the rest.

We now proceed to furnish some specimens of the modes of life which

thieves and swindlers fall into, that our _honest_ readers may have an

opportunity of contrasting them with their own. In so doing, they will

doubtless congratulate themselves on the possession of moral principle,

satisfied that predatory propensities would have disturbed that calm

which belongs only to virtue. The following is Ward's account of his

first act of dishonesty.--

"Finding it impossible, as I thought, to withstand the

impetuosity of my inclinations and desires for freedom and

pleasure, I resolved, even against my better judgment, to leave

Mr. Pusey and seek my fortune. My hopes were raised to the

highest and most pleasing prospects of independence, ease, and

affluence; and having in my earliest life cultivated the

principle, that in all cases which require secrecy, we should

never divulge to a friend what we wish to conceal from an

enemy, I concealed my intentions from every body, determining

to embrace the first opportunity favourable for prosecuting my

first, long-cogitated, and, as I thought, exceedingly cunning

plan. Accordingly, during the autumn of 1806, on a Sabbath

afternoon, I determined to execute my scheme. Near home, there

was a store kept by Mr. Kinsey, in copartnership with Mr.

Pusey. I was on terms of the greatest harmony and friendship

with Mr. Kinsey; and, taking advantage of this confidence, I

had ascertained where his cash was kept. I entered the store,

and found no difficulty in obtaining every cent. All the family

being from home, I concluded to let the house take care of

itself, as, having done thus much, I must inevitably make my

departure. Having saddled Mr. Pusey's best horse, I mounted,

and, with saddle-bags and clothing, started from the house.

Being certain I should be pursued as soon as the robbery was

discovered, I thought it would be proper to take a course, on

which I could most advantageously travel by night as well as by

day. I accordingly took my way towards Lancaster; but about

four miles from home, I was seen by some person who knew me.

Now I was likely to be defeated in all my calculations. At

dark, I arrived at Witmer's Bridge, within two miles of

Lancaster, having ridden sixteen miles in two hours. I stopt

there only a few minutes to water and feed my horse, and,

remounting, I rode to near daylight next morning, when I

arrived at Anderson's Ferry on the Susquehanna. There I was

detained some time by the negligence of the boatmen; and I had

not proceeded more than half way across the river, when I heard

the horn blow as a signal for them to hurry back. Although I

trembled at the dread sound and alarm of the approach of my

pursuers, I vainly hoped it was impossible for them to be so

close after me. However, I determined now that I would give

them every trouble, let them take me or not. I did not stop for

breakfast, and as I had ridden the whole night, my horse became

fatigued and slow, so that about noon I was overtaken by

another horseman, whom I found to be my own cousin. He desired

me to stop immediately and return, he himself having been

suspected of the very act I had committed. As my horse was

tired down, I sprang with all my might, to secure myself by

taking to the woods. Here again my hopes were frustrated; for

my foot caught in the stirrup, and I was forced to yield to

superior strength. On our way back, he explained the cause of

his overtaking me. Having ridden his horse down, he had hired

fresh ones at regular distances. This mode of pursuit I had not

thought of; but, alas! I was told of it now, when it was too

late! Every measure that I had thought most fitly adapted for

my clearance, seemed now only to aggravate my folly. Shame for

my guilt filled my mind with the keenest remorse.

Mr. Pusey sent for a constable, and informed me I must go to

jail. Attended by the constable, and another as an assistant, I

started with a heavy heart. We travelled on foot, and very

slowly, so that when night came on, we had eight or nine miles

yet to go. The constable being negligent, permitted me at times

to be twenty or thirty yards from him; and of these

opportunities I designed to avail myself. Accordingly, on

reaching a place where the road made a short turn, I dashed

from them into the bushes, where I hid myself. After they had

passed me unnoticed, I cut a large club, and travelled my own

way a short distance, when I met a man who eyed me in a

scrutinizing manner. I immediately asked him, whether he had

seen a fellow running that way from the constables who were

taking him to jail? He answered that he had, and that he

believed I was the very fellow! 'Well,' said I, 'if you think

so, you are welcome to take me.' But fearing my large club, he

left me to pursue my journey. Travelling a little distance, I

came to a tavern, and looking through the window, saw the

constable and his assistant eating their supper. Their horses

resting under a shed, I was about to take one; but seeing a

barn at a short distance from me, I abandoned my intention. I

went into it, and retired to rest for the night. I arose next

morning after a refreshing sleep, and pursued my journey to my

father's, and arrived at Strasburgh about breakfast time. On

entering the tavern, I saw an elderly lady who had lived with

Mr. Pusey. She asked me how I was, and where I was going? I

told her to visit my parents. She answered, that she really

believed I was running away! Apprehensive of danger, I resumed

my journey towards my father's, and on the road I met him. From

my relation of the affair, he gave it as his opinion that it

would be imprudent in me to return again; for he had not the

least doubt that I should be arrested, and dealt with according

to my offence; so, after remaining at his house a short time, I

bent my course to Reading. I confidently believe, to this very

day, that if I had not escaped punishment for this crime, I

never should have committed another in my whole life."

Another of his escapes we shall here insert, premising that he had been

apprehended for stealing a horse.

"He brought with him a blacksmith, who had a load of chains

upon his shoulder. The smith put a collar round my neck, and

shackles on my ankles. Between these was a small chain for the

purpose of making me fast to any thing by a padlock. Mounted on

horseback, this chain was passed to the one attached to my

collar, and there locked; besides this I was hand-cuffed. Thus

equipped, we repaired towards Georgia, through a country mostly

inhabited by Indians. On arriving within two days' journey of

home, we took lodging at a public house, the first we had seen.

Dismounting, my chain was in part wrapped round one of my legs,

and the others around my neck. In this situation we took supper

with the family, and sat a considerable time after the table

was removed. As it was determined we should remain here for the

night, which was dark and rainy, I had hopes that I could some

way or other make my escape. Having called to a servant to

bring me a basin of water to wash my feet, I took care to wind

the chain closely around my leg. I then asked her to open the

front door for me, as though I intended only to throw out the

dirty water; this I did, and finding there were no fears of my

going out, I walked a few times across the floor. This gave me

a chance to put on my hat unnoticed, when, taking the advantage

of a minute, I dashed out and jumped the yard fence; but in so

doing, I lost my hat. Having no time to lose, I made a straight

course from the house. I soon heard them all in confusion, and

saw some of them out of doors with a light. The landlord having

a large dog, they brought him in pursuit of me. He took my

track, and had nigh taken me when I just reached a creek, into

the waters of which I waded some distance, turning with the

stream from the place I entered at. Here I stood, leg deep, for

some time, hearing all their conclusions respecting me.

Thinking I had crossed there, they gave me up, and returned to

the house again. I immediately made my retreat from a place

surrounding and threatening me with so many dangers. After

running and walking about four miles, fatigued and lost, I lay

down and slept till morning. I then steered my course across

the country, avoiding houses and settlements, hoping to see

some slaves in the fields to help me to take off my irons, but

could see none. Near noon, I came in sight of an old house

which I discovered was inhabited. I approached it at the side

where there was no window. I went to a wagon, and taking from

it an iron bolt and a linchpin, I made to the woods, where,

with much difficulty, I succeeded in extricating myself from my

collar and chains. I placed them in a pile at the root of a

large tree, near which I lay down and slept till evening, being

afraid to travel in the day-time. At dark I arose, and made my

way towards South Carolina, walking the whole night, and by

morning was thirty miles from where I started. My greatest

difficulty was having no hat. Coming, however, to a river, I

saw a bridge that crossed it a little below me. I went on it,

and stood leaning over its wall, till I saw a traveller coming

the other way. As soon as he approached me, I told him, with

much concern, that I had met with bad luck; for I had just been

looking over the wall when my hat fell off, and went rapidly

down the stream, the sides of which were so dangerous I could

not possibly get it again:--would he be so kind as to tell me

where I could buy another? He told me he would conduct me to a

store; I went with him and purchased one."

The life of a thief is one of perpetual anxiety, yet with many it

becomes a sort of passion. The earnings of honest industry, even when

sufficient to keep them in comfort, are not sufficient to keep them

satisfied. The recollection of dangers escaped, the chance of similar

fortune again, the prurience of activity,--all urge to a renewal of

their lawless pursuits; and as a thoroughbred sportsman despises the

practice of catching game by snares, deeming it unworthy of a skilful

marksman, so, we suspect, do thieves regard the reward of industry, when

compared with the booty of a dangerous encounter. In Vaux's Memoirs we

find much to lead us to this conclusion. Several times was he well

settled in the way of obtaining, not only an honest livelihood, but of

participating in elegancies, luxuries, and agreeable society. Still, as

if impelled by destiny, he continually risked the loss of all, to

gratify his bad propensity. Ward, on the contrary, had been perpetually

unfortunate in realizing his visionary hopes; he was entreated by his

wife to forsake his evil courses; but it was all in vain. "Resorting

occasionally," he says, "to the company of some adepts in crime, _it

seemed to afford me pleasure_." And in the narratives of the other two,

we find evident delight manifested at the success of a hazardous,

fraudulent undertaking, while the guilt of the action, and the pain and

misery it may have occasioned, are overlooked or lightly regarded, just

as a military hero, exulting in a victory, laments the loss of neither

friends nor foes. Human happiness, in truth, is connected in the minds

of different persons with the most opposite deeds and qualities.

Diogenes in his tub, and Alexander at the head of an army, was each

pursuing his gratification; and who shall decide which was the more

successful? Hume, in one of his Essays, remarks, that there is no

question that a boarding-school miss has often experienced as exquisite

delight on finding herself the idol of a ball-room, as an orator when

receiving the rapturous applauses of a delighted audience; and Colley

Gibber says, that on hearing an old actor express admiration at one of

his early performances on the stage, he felt so proud of the

commendation, that he doubted whether "Alexander himself, or Charles

XII., when at the head of their first victorious armies, could feel a

greater transport in their bosoms." After reading this, some may perhaps

think that Pope's epigram on Cibber[14] was not unmerited; but when they

consider that thieves feel a similar exultation, they may rather be

inclined to pity poor human nature. In exemplification of what we have

advanced, we request attention to the following extract from Vaux. Some

of his acquaintances in Newgate had informed him that Mr. Bilger, a

jeweller and goldsmith, was a _good flat_.

"About 5 o'clock in the evening, I entered his shop, dressed in

the most elegant style, having a valuable gold watch and

appendages, a gold eye-glass, &c. I had posted my old friend

and aid-de-camp, Bromley, at the door, in order to be in

readiness to act as circumstances might require, and

particularly to watch the motions of Mr. Bilger and his

assistants on my quitting the premises. On my entrance, Mrs.

Bilger issued from a back parlour behind the shop, and politely

inquiring my business, I told her I wished to see Mr. Bilger;

she immediately rang a bell, which brought down her husband

from the upper apartments. He saluted me with a low bow, and

handed me a seat. I was glad to find no other person in the

shop, Mrs. Bilger having again retired. I now assumed the air

of a Bond-street lounger, and informed Mr. Bilger, that I had

been recommended by a gentleman of my acquaintance to deal with

him, having occasion for a very elegant diamond ring, and

requested to see his assortment. Mr. Bilger expressed his

concern that he happened not to have a single article of that

description by him, but if I could without inconvenience call

again, he would undertake in one hour to procure me a selection

from his working-jeweller, to whom he would immediately

despatch a messenger. I affected to feel somewhat disappointed;

but, looking at my watch, after a moment's reflection, I said,

'Well, Mr. Bilger, I have an appointment at the Cannon

coffee-house, which requires my attendance, and if you will,

without fail, have the articles ready, I may probably look in a

little after six.' This he promised faithfully to do, declaring

how much he felt obliged by my condescension; and I sauntered

out of the shop, Mr. Bilger attending me in the most obsequious

manner to the outer door. After walking a short distance,

Bromley tapped me on the shoulder, and inquired what conduct I

meant next to pursue; for he had viewed my proceedings through

a glass-door in the shop, and saw that I had not executed my

grand design. I related to Bromley the result of my

conversation with Mr. Bilger, and added that I meant to retire

to the nearest public-house, where we could enjoy a pipe and a

glass of negus, until the expiration of the hour to which I had

limited myself. We accordingly regaled ourselves at a very snug

house, nearly opposite Bilger's, until about half after six,

when I again repaired to the scene of action, leaving Bromley,

as at first, posted at the door. Mr. Bilger received me with

increased respect, and producing a small card box, expressed

his sorrow that his workman had only been enabled to send three

rings for my inspection, but that if they were not to my taste,

he should feel honoured and obliged in taking my directions for

having one made, and flattered himself he should execute the

order to my satisfaction. I proceeded to examine the rings he

produced, one of which was marked sixteen guineas, another nine

guineas, and the third six guineas. They were all extremely

beautiful; but I affected to consider them as too paltry,

telling Mr. Bilger that I wanted one to present to a lady, and

that I wished to have a ring of greater value than the whole

three put together, as a few guineas would not be an object in

the price. Mr. Bilger's son, who was also his partner, now

joined us, and was desired by his father to sketch a draught in

pencil of some fancy rings, agreeable to the directions I

should give him. The three rings I had viewed, were now removed

to the end of the counter next the window, and I informed the

young man that I wished to have something of a cluster, a large

brilliant in the centre, surrounded with smaller ones; but

repeated my desire that no expense might be spared to render

the article strictly elegant, and worthy a lady's acceptance.

The son having sketched a design of several rings on a card, I

examined them with attention, and appeared in doubt which to

prefer, but desired to see some loose diamonds, in order to

form a better idea of the size, &c. of each ring described in

the drawing. Mr. Bilger, however, declared he had not any by

him. It is probable he spoke truth, or he might have lost such

numbers by showing them, as to deter him from exhibiting them

in future. Without having made up my mind on the subject, I now

requested to see some of his most fashionable brooches, or

shirt-pins. Mr. Bilger produced a show-glass, containing a

great variety of articles in pearl, but he had nothing of the

kind in diamonds. I took up two or three of the brooches, and

immediately _sunk_ a very handsome one, marked three guineas,

in my coat sleeve. I next purloined a beautiful clasp for a

lady's waist, consisting of stones set in gold, which had the

appearance and brilliancy of real diamonds, but marked only

four guineas. I should probably have gone still deeper, but at

this moment a lady coming in, desired to look at some

ear-rings, and the younger Mr. Bilger immediately quitted his

father to attend upon her at the other end of the shop. It

struck me that now was my time for a decisive stroke. The card

containing the diamond rings, procured from the maker, lying

very near the show-glass I was viewing, and many small articles

irregularly placed round about them, the candles not throwing

much light on that particular spot, and Mr. Bilger's attention

being divided between myself and the lady, to whom he

frequently addressed himself, I suddenly took the three rings

from the card, and committed them to my sleeve, to join the

brooch and lady's clasp; but had them so situated, that I

could, in a moment, have released and replaced them on the

counter, had an inquiry been made for them. I then looked at my

watch, and observing that I was going to the theatre, told Mr.

Bilger that I would not trouble him any further, as the

articles before me were too tawdry and common to please me, but

that I would put the card of draughts in my pocket-book, and if

I did not meet with a ring of the kind I wanted, before Monday

or Tuesday, I would certainly call again, and give him final

directions. I was then drawing on my gloves, being anxious to

quit the shop while I was well; but Mr. Bilger, who seemed

delighted with the prospect of my custom, begged so earnestly

that I would allow him to show me his brilliant assortment of

gold watches, that I could not refuse to gratify him, though I

certainly incurred a great risk by my compliance. I therefore

answered,--'Really, Mr. Bilger, I am loath to give you that

unnecessary trouble, as I have, you may perceive, a very good

watch already, in point of performance; though it cost me a

mere trifle, only twenty guineas; but it answers my purpose as

well as a more valuable one. However, as I may probably, before

long, want an elegant watch for a lady, I dont care if I just

run my eye over them.' Mr. Bilger replied, that the greater

part of his stock were fancy watches, adapted for ladies, and

he defied all London united, to exhibit a finer collection. He

then took from his window a show-glass, containing about thirty

most beautiful watches, some ornamented with pearls or

diamonds, others elegantly enamelled, or chased in the most

delicate style. They were of various prices, from thirty to one

hundred guineas, and the old gentleman, rubbing his hands with

an air of rapture, exclaimed,--'There they are, sir,--a most

fashionable assortment of goods; allow me to recommend them;

they're all a-going, sir--all a-going.' I smiled inwardly at

the latter part of this speech, and thought to myself,--'I wish

they were going, with all my heart, along with the diamond

rings.' I answered, they were certainly very handsome, but I

would defer a minute inspection of them till my next visit,

when I should have more time to spare. These watches were

ranged in exact order, in five parallel lines, and between each

watch was placed a gold seal or other trinket appertaining to a

lady's watch. It was no easy matter, therefore, to take away a

single article without its being instantly missed, unless the

economy of the whole had been previously deranged. I contrived,

however, to displace a few of the trinkets, on pretence of

admiring them, and ventured to secrete one very rich gold seal,

marked six guineas. I then declared I could stay no longer, as

I had appointed to meet a party at the theatre; but that I

would certainly call again in a few days, and lay out some

money in return for the trouble I had given. Mr. Bilger

expressed his thanks in the most respectful terms, and waited

upon me to the door, where he took leave of me with a low

_conge, a la mode de France_, of which country he was a native.

I now put the best foot foremost, and having gained a remote

street, turned my head, and perceived Bromley at my heels, who

seized my hand, congratulating me on my success, and

complimenting me on the address I had shown in this exploit;

for he had witnessed all that passed, and knew that I had

succeeded in my object, by the manner in which I quitted the

shop. He informed me that Mr. Bilger had returned to his

counter, and without attending to the arrangement of the

articles thereon, had joined his son, who was still waiting

upon the lady, and that he, Bromley, had finally left them both

engaged with her."

Who can fail to perceive, in the above narrative, the satisfaction of

the author in displaying his adroitness? His vanity seems to be as much

gratified, as if he had been relating some performance meriting

approbation. The feeling of shame is altogether alien to him. And thus,

by Vidocq's account, it always is with thieves, they glorying as much in

detailing their successful exploits, as if no ignominy could attach to

them. Amongst his confederates too, and all of the same class, his

reputation is proportionate to his daring and skill. Of this, take the

following instance related by Vidocq.--

"The incredible effrontery of Beaumont, almost surpasses

belief. Escaped from the Bagne at Rochefort, where he was

sentenced to pass twelve years of his life, he came to Paris,

and scarcely had he arrived there, where he had already

practised, when, by way of getting his hand in, he committed

several trifling robberies, and when, by these preliminary

steps, he had proceeded to exploits more worthy of his ancient

renown, he conceived the project of stealing a treasure. No

one will imagine that this was in the Central Office, now the

Prefecture of Police!! It was already pretty difficult to

procure impressions of the keys, but he achieved the first

difficulty, and soon had in his possession all the means of

effecting an opening; but to open was nothing; it was necessary

to open without being perceived, to introduce himself without

fear of being disturbed, to work without witnesses, and go out

again freely. Beaumont, who had calculated all the difficulties

that opposed him, was not dismayed. He had remarked that the

private room of the chief officer, M. Henry, was nigh to the

spot where he proposed to effect his entrance; he espied the

propitious moment, and wished sincerely that some circumstance

would call away so dangerous a neighbour for some time, and

chance was subservient to his wishes. One morning, M. Henry was

obliged to go out. Beaumont, sure that he would not return that

day, ran to his house, put on a black coat, and in that

costume, which, in those days, always announced a magistrate,

or public functionary, presents himself at the entrance of the

Central Office. The officer to whom he addressed himself,

supposed of course that he was at least a commissary. On the

invitation of Beaumont, he gave him a soldier, whom he placed

as sentinel at the entrance to the narrow passage which leads

to the depot, and commanded not to allow any person to pass. No

better expedient could be found for preventing surprise. Thus

Beaumont, in the midst of a crowd of valuable objects, could,

at his leisure, and in perfect security, choose what best

pleased him; watches, jewels, diamonds, precious stones, &c. He

chose those which he deemed most valuable, most portable, and

as soon as he had made his selection, he dismissed the sentinel

and disappeared.

"This robbery could not be long concealed, and the following

day was discovered. Had thunder fallen on the police, they

would have been less astonished than at this event. To

penetrate to the very sanctuary! The holy of holies! The fact

appeared so very extraordinary, that it was doubted. Yet it was

evident that a robbery had taken place, and to whom was it to

be attributed? All the suspicions fell on the clerks, sometimes

on one, sometimes on another, when Beaumont, betrayed by a

friend, was apprehended, and sentenced a second time. The

robbery he had committed might be estimated at some hundred

thousand francs, the greater part of which were found on him.

"Beaumont enjoyed amongst his confraternity a colossal

reputation; and even now, when a rogue boasts of his lofty

exploits,--'Hold your tongue,' they say, 'you are not worthy to

untie the shoe-strings of Beaumont!' In effect, to have robbed

the police was the height of address."

We now proceed to make the reader acquainted with the habits and

exertions of police-officers, who perform exploits equal in craft and

danger to those of thieves. In order to detect the latter, they often

resort to the vilest places, and associate with the vilest of mankind;

assume various characters and occupations; and sometimes,

perhaps,--stimulated by the hope of reward,--lead others to commit

crimes in order to entrap them. Vidocq, however, professes in every case

to have acted without any desire to entice. He says that he himself

never proposed any scheme of robbery; but took care to concur in such as

were proposed by others. This declaration must, we suppose, be received

with some qualification, as without an occasional suggestion, he would

probably have been suspected in his designs. Be that as it may, he was

eminently successful in securing villains; for having practised villainy

himself, he knew their ways and devices, thus verifying the propriety of

the maxim,--"Set a thief to catch a thief." Some of the convicts at

Botany Bay make the best police-officers. Of this we have an instance

in Barrington, the famous London pick-pocket, who rendered such

essential services to the colony, that in his old age he was pensioned

by the government. By what means Vidocq, after all his devotion, came to

lose his office, he has not mentioned; an omission rather singular,

which lays his character open to suspicion, especially as he has given

the circumstances that first led him to offer himself to the police.

These circumstances it may be proper to glance at, as they exhibit a

view of the dangers attendant on a lawless course of life.

"At this period, it seemed as if the whole world was leagued

against me; I was compelled to draw my purse-strings at every

moment, and for whom? For creatures who, looking on my

liberality as compulsory, were prepared to betray me as soon as

I ceased to be a certain source of reliance. When I went home

from my wife's, I had still another proof of the wretchedness

affixed to the state of a fugitive galley-slave. Annette and my

mother were in tears. During my absence, two drunken men had

asked for me, and on being told that I was from home, they had

broke forth in oaths and threats, which left me no longer in

doubt of the perfidy of their intentions. By the description

which Annette gave me of these two individuals, I easily

recognised Blondy, and his comrade, Deluc. I had no trouble in

guessing their names; and besides, they had left an address,

with a formal injunction to send them forty francs, which was

more than enough to disclose to me who they were, as there were

not in Paris any other persons who could send me such an

intimation. I was obedient, very obedient; only in paying my

contribution to these two scoundrels, I could not help letting

them know how inconsiderately they had behaved. 'Consider what

a step you have taken,' said I to them; 'they know nothing at

my house, and you have told them all. My wife, who carries on

the concern in her name, will perhaps turn me out, and then I

must be reduced to the lowest ebb of misery.'--'Oh! you can

come and rob with us,' answered the two rascals. I endeavoured

to convince them, how much better it was to owe an existence to

honest toil, than to be in incessant fears from the police,

which, sooner or later, catches all malefactors in its nets. I

added, that one crime generally leads to another; that he would

risk his neck who ran straight towards the guillotine; and the

termination of my discourse was, that they would do well to

renounce the dangerous career on which they had entered. 'Not

so bad!' cried Blondy, when I had finished my lecture, 'not so

bad.' 'But can you, in the mean time, point out to us any

apartment that we can ransack? We are, you see, like Harlequin,

and have more need of cash than advice;' and they left me,

laughing deridingly at me. I called them back, to profess my

attachment to them, and begged them not to call again at my

house. 'If that is all,' said Deluc, 'we will keep from

that.'--'Oh yes, we'll keep away,' added Blondy, 'since that is

unpleasant to your mistress.' But the latter did not stay away

long: the very next day, at night-fall, he presented himself at

my ware-house, and asked to speak to me privately. I took him

into my own room. 'We are alone?' said he to me, looking round

at the room in which we were; and when he was assured that he

had no witnesses, he drew from his pocket eleven silver forks,

and two gold watches, which he placed on a stand. 'Four hundred

francs for this would not be too much--the silver plate and the

gold watches.--Come, tip us the needful.'--'Four hundred

francs!' said I, alarmed at so abrupt a total,--'I have not so

much money.'--'Never mind; go and sell the goods.'--'But if it

should be known!'--'That's your affair; I want the ready; or if

you like it better, I'll send you customers from the

police-office;--you know what a word would do;--come,

come,--the cash, the chink, and no gammon.' I understood the

scoundrel but too well: I saw myself denounced, dragged from

the state in which I had installed myself, and led back to the

Bagne. I counted out the four hundred francs."

Considering the danger in which Vidocq was placed, his offer to serve

the police was judicious. What could be more trying than to lie at the

mercy of rascals? Obliged to be continually supplying them with

hush-money, and yet always afraid of being betrayed by them, he was in

perpetual torment; but, his services once accepted by the police, all

this was at an end. He must have felt himself like a man escaped from a

wreck, and from the horrors of contending elements; like Ulysses, to

whom we have before compared him, when, having accepted the mantle

offered him by Leucothea, he reached the friendly shore of Pheacia. Like

him, too, his toils were to be renewed. He had enemies to cope with and

subdue, and who required to be encountered with as much subtlety and

resolution as Penelope's suitors. The following is his account of his

first capture.--

"One morning I was hastily summoned to attend the chief of the

division. The matter in hand was to discover a man named

Watrin, accused of having fabricated and put in circulation

false money and bank-notes. The inspectors of the police had

already arrested Watrin, but, according to custom, had allowed

him to escape. M. Henry gave me every direction which he deemed

likely to assist me in the search after him; but,

unfortunately, he had only gleaned a few simple particulars of

his usual habits and customary haunts. Every place he was known

to frequent was freely pointed out to me; but it was not very

likely he would be found in those resorts, which prudence would

call upon him carefully to avoid: there remained, therefore,

only a chance of reaching him by some bye-path. When I learnt

that he had left his effects in a furnished house, where he

once lodged, on the boulevard of Mont Parnasse, I took it for

granted, that, sooner or later, he would go there in search of

his property; or, at least, that he would send some person to

fetch it from thence; consequently I directed all my vigilance

to this spot; and after having reconnoitred the house, I lay in

ambush in its vicinity, night and day, in order to keep a

watchful eye upon all comers and goers. This went on for nearly

a week, when, weary of not observing any thing, I determined

upon engaging the master of the house in my interest, and to

hire an apartment of him, where I accordingly established

myself with Annette, certain that my presence could give rise

to no suspicion. I had occupied this post for about fifteen

days, when, one evening, at eleven o'clock, I was informed that

Watrin had just come, accompanied by another person. Owing to a

slight indisposition, I had retired to bed earlier than usual;

however, at this news I rose hastily, and descended the

staircase by four stairs at a time; but whatever diligence I

might use, I was only just in time to catch Watrin's companion;

him I had no right to detain, but I made myself sure that I

might, by intimidation, obtain further particulars from him. I

therefore seized him, threatened him, and soon drew from him a

confession, that he was a shoemaker, and that Watrin lived with

him, No. 4, _Rue des Mauvais Garcons_. This was all I wanted to

know: I had only time to slip an old great coat over my shirt,

and, without stopping to put on more garments, I hurried on to

the place thus pointed out to me. I reached the house the very

instant that some person was quitting it: persuaded that it was

Watrin, I attempted to seize him; he escaped from me, and I

darted after him up a staircase; but at the moment of grasping

him, a violent blow, which struck my chest, drove me down

twenty stairs. I sprung forward again, and that so quickly,

that, to escape from my pursuit, he was compelled to return

into the house through a sash-window. I then knocked loudly at

the door, summoning him to open it without delay. This he

refused to do. I then desired Annette, who had followed me, to

go in search of the guard; and, whilst she was preparing to

obey me, I counterfeited the noise of a man descending the

stairs. Watrin, deceived by this feint, was anxious to satisfy

himself whether I had actually gone, and softly put his head

out of the window, to observe if all was safe. This was exactly

what I wanted. I made a vigorous dart forwards, and seized him

by the hair of his head: he grasped me in the same manner, and

a desperate struggle took place: jammed against the

partition-wall which separated us, he opposed me with a

determined resistance. Nevertheless, I felt that he was growing

weaker; I collected all my strength for a last effort; I

strained every nerve, and drew him nearly out of the window

through which we were struggling; one more trial, and the

victory was mine; but in the earnestness of my grasp, we both

rolled on the passage floor, on to which I had pulled him. To

rise, snatch from his hands the shoemaker's cutting knife with

which he had armed himself, to bind him and lead him out of the

house, was the work of an instant. Accompanied only by Annette,

I conducted him to the prefecture, where I received the

congratulations, first of M. Henry, and afterwards those of the

prefect of police, who bestowed on me a pecuniary recompense."

The next account we shall transcribe, is one of his freeing the

community of a receiver of stolen goods. This man had been long watched

by the police; but all attempts to convict him had failed. Accordingly

M. Henry was desirous that Vidocq should use his endeavours, which he

readily did as follows.

"Posted near the house of the suspected dealer in stolen

property, I watched for his going out; and, following him when

he had gone a few steps down the street, addressed him by a

different name to his own. He assured me I was mistaken; I

protested to the contrary; he insisted upon it I was deceived;

and I affected to be equally satisfied of his identity,

declaring my perfect recognition of his person, as that of a

man who, for some time, had been sought after by the police

throughout Paris and its environs. 'You are grossly mistaken,'

replied he warmly; 'my name is so and so, and I live in such a

street.' 'Come, come, friend,' said I, 'excuses are useless; I

know you too well to part with you so easily.' 'This is too

much,' cried he, 'but, at the next police station, I shall

probably be able to meet with those who can convince you, that

I know my own name better than you seem to do.' This was

exactly the point at which I wished to arrive. 'Agreed,' said

I, and we bent our steps to the neighbouring guard-house. We

entered, and I requested him to show me his papers; he had none

about him. I then insisted upon his being searched, and, on his

person, were found three watches, and twenty-five double

Napoleons, which I caused to be laid aside till he should be

examined before a magistrate. These things had been wrapped in

a handkerchief, which I contrived to secure, and, after having

disguised myself as a messenger, I hastened to the house of

this receiver of stolen goods, and demanded to speak with his

wife. She, of course, had no idea of my business, or knowledge

of my person, and seeing several persons besides herself

present, I signified to her, that my business being of a

private nature, it was important that I should speak to her

alone; and in token of my claims to her confidence, produced

the handkerchief, and inquired whether she recognised it?

Although still ignorant of the cause of my visit, her

countenance became troubled, and her whole person was much

agitated, as she begged me to let her hear my business. 'I am

concerned,' replied I, 'to be the bearer of unpleasant news;

but the fact is, your husband has just been arrested, every

thing found on his person has been seized, and, from some words

which he happened to overhear, he suspects he has been

betrayed; he therefore wishes you to remove out of the house

certain things, you are aware would be dangerous to his safety

if found on the premises. If you please, I will lend you a

helping hand, but I must forewarn you that you have not one

moment to lose.' The information was of the first importance.

The sight of the handkerchief, and the description of the

objects it had served to envelope, removed from her mind every

doubt as to the truth of the message I had brought her; and she

easily fell into the snare I had laid to entrap her. She

thanked me for the trouble I had taken, and begged I would go

and engage three hackney coaches, and return to her with as

little delay as possible. I left the house to execute my

commission, but on the road, I stopped to give one of my people

instructions to keep the coaches in sight, and to seize them,

with their contents, directly I should give the signal. The

vehicles drew up to the door, and, upon re-entering the house,

I found things in a high state of preparation for removing. The

floor was strewed with articles of every description;

time-pieces, candelabra, Etruscan vases, cloths, cachemires,

linen, muslin, &c. All these things had been taken from a

closet, the entrance to which was cleverly concealed by a large

press, so skilfully contrived, that the most practised eye

could not have discovered the deception. I assisted in the

removal, and, when it was completed, the press having been

carefully replaced, the woman begged of me to accompany her,

which I did; and no sooner was she in one of the coaches, ready

to start, than I suddenly pulled up the window, and, at this

previously concerted signal, we were immediately surrounded by

the police. The husband and wife were tried at the assizes,

and, as may be easily conceived, were overwhelmed beneath the

weight of an accusation, in support of which there existed a

formidable mass of convicting testimony."

We must extract one more account from Vidocq, to show the desperate

hazards which police-officers sometimes run, in capturing criminals;

hazards which, when surmounted, they naturally exult in. Information had

been received at the police-office, that one Fossard, who had several

times effected escapes from jail, was living with his mistress in a

certain district of Paris; that the windows of his apartment had yellow

curtains; and that a hump-backed seamstress lived in the same house.

This was very indefinite; for neither the street, nor the number of the

house was known, and curtains might be changed. However, Vidocq was not

deterred from undertaking a search; accordingly, disguised as an

old-fashioned gentleman, he began the enterprise. He went from street to

street; ascended staircase after staircase till his limbs ached; called

at the doors of scores of seamstresses, but no hump-backed damsel

appeared;--all were as straight as arrows! Not more ardently, he says,

did Don Quixote pant for Dulcinea, than he for Humpina. Days rolled on

unsuccessfully: he began to despair. At length he resolved to change his

measures, and, instead of clambering up flights of steps, to station

himself near the stand of a gossiping milk-woman, and watch her

customers. Numbers of women came to buy their milk in the morning, but

not one adorned with the delectable hump. At length, in the evening, he

caught sight of one whose back had the desired ornament. He followed her

from the milk-woman's to the grocer's, from the grocer's to the

tripe-shop, and, finally, to her home; but when he got there, no yellow

curtains were to be seen. What was to be done? He resolved to speak to

her at all events; so, feigning himself to be a deserted husband, he

inquired of her whether Fossard and his mistress were occupants of any

part of the house? Her reply was disheartening:--they had quitted their

lodgings, and were gone, she knew not where. Still, the case did not

appear hopeless. He had employed a porter to carry his goods, and might

not that porter be found? A new search was requisite, and it terminated

successfully, by his tracing Fossard to a vintner's. Considering, then,

that it was advisable to have the vintner on his side, he called on him

in his usual dress, and informed him, from the police, that his lodgers

meditated robbing him. He and his wife were in consternation at the

intelligence; but Vidocq having pacified them, arranged his plans. The

grand difficulty to be overcome, arose from Fossard's always carrying a

loaded pistol in his hand, and which, they knew from his character, he

would assuredly discharge at the first man that laid hands on him. Here

Vidocq must tell his own tale, we premising, that Fossard's mistress

styled herself Madame Hazard.--

"At an early hour, on the 29th of December, I betook myself to

my station. It was desperately cold; the watch was a protracted

one, and the more painful as we had no fire. Motionless,

however, and my eyes fixed against a small hole in the shutter,

I kept my post. At last, about three o'clock, he went out. I

followed gladly, and recognised him; for, up to that period, I

had my doubts. Certain now of his identity, I wished, at that

moment, to put into execution the order for his apprehension;

but the officer who was with me, said he saw the terrible

pistol. That I might authenticate the fact, I walked quickly

and passed Fossard, and then returning, saw clearly that the

agent was right. To attempt to arrest him would have been

useless, and I resolved to defer it. On the 31st of December,

at eleven o'clock, when all my batteries were charged and my

plans perfect, Fossard returned, and, without distrust,

ascended the staircase shaking with cold; and, twenty minutes

after, the disappearance of the light indicated that he was in

bed. The moment had now arrived. The commissary and gend'armes,

summoned by me, were waiting at the nearest guard-house until I

should call them, and then enter quietly. We deliberated on the

most effectual mode of seizing Fossard, without running the

risk of being killed or wounded; for they were persuaded, that,

unless surprised, this robber would defend himself desperately.

My first thought was, to do nothing till daybreak, as I had

been told that Fossard's companion went down very early to get

the milk; we should then seize her, and, after having taken the

key from her, we should enter the room of her lover; but might

it not happen that, contrary to his usual custom, he might go

out first? This reflection led me to adopt another expedient.

The vintner's wife, in whose favour, as I was told, M. Hazard

was much prepossessed, had one of her nephews at her house, a

lad about ten years of age, intelligent beyond his years, and

the more desirous of getting money, as he was a Norman. I

promised him a reward, on condition that, under pretence of his

aunt's being taken suddenly ill, he should go and beg Madame

Hazard to give him some Eau de Cologne. I desired the little

chap to assume the most piteous tone he could; and was so well

satisfied with the specimen he gave me, that I began to

distribute the parts to my performers. The denouement was near

at hand. I made all my party take off their shoes, doing the

same myself, that we might not be heard whilst going up stairs.

The little snivelling pilot was in his shirt; he rang the

bell;--no one answered: again he rang;--'Who's there,' was

heard.--'It is I Madame Hazard; it is Louis: my poor aunt is

very bad, and begs you will be so very obliging as to give her

a little Eau de Cologne.--Oh! she is dying!--I have got a

light.' The door was opened; and scarcely had Madame Hazard

presented herself, when two powerful gend'armes seized on her,

and fastened a napkin over her mouth to prevent her crying out.

At the same instant, with more rapidity than the lion when

darting on his prey, I threw myself upon Fossard; who,

stupified by what was doing, and already fast bound and

confined in his bed, was my prisoner before he could make a

single movement, or utter a single word. So great was his

amazement, that it was nearly an hour before he could

articulate even a few words. When a light was brought, and he

saw my black face and garb of a coalman, he experienced such an

increase of terror, that I really believe he imagined himself

in the devil's clutches. On coming to himself, he thought of

his arms,--his pistols and dagger,--which were upon the table;

and, turning his eyes towards them, he made a struggle, but

that was all; for, reduced to the impossibility of doing any

mischief, he was passive."

From the above extracts, a tolerably correct idea may be formed of

thieves and police-officers;--men who co-exist in every civilized

community, but who lead lives requiring the cunning and personal bravery

of savages. The thief exults in the success of a daring exploit, and

prides himself on his skill in avoiding the meshes of magistrates and

lawyers: the police-officer is no less vain of his skill, in detecting

and dragging to justice the man who boasts of his superiority in

artifice, while he almost defies the arm of vengeance. In order that the

number of such characters may be reduced, all reasonable attempts should

be made to reclaim juvenile delinquents; prisons should be not only

places of terror, but places where the spread of corruption is

effectually prevented, by the prohibition of intercourse amongst the

inmates; and, above all, education, founded on a moral and religious

basis, should be extended throughout society. Facts bear us out in

asserting, that crimes of the greatest magnitude, such as murder,

burglary, and arson, considerably diminish with the spread of

civilization, which operates, like the circle formed by the pebble

thrown into water, in extending its influence in proportion to its

circumference. As philanthropists in many different countries are

labouring simultaneously to promote this great end, we are justified in

considering the present age as the harbinger of a better; and we may

rejoice in the anticipation. The progressive improvement of the human

family is a delightful subject for meditation, giving us, perhaps, a

prelibation of the joys of futurity, and animating us to contribute our

aid, trifling as it may be, to the melioration of the condition of our

country.

Before closing this article, we can scarcely forbear remarking, that the

translator of Vidocq has used various words which have been considered

by English writers as Americanisms; such as _to progress_, _to

approbate_, and _lengthy_; also _chicken-fighting_ for cock-fighting.

Whether he is an American or an Englishman we know not; but certain we

are, that nearly every one of the alleged peculiarities in language,

adopted by Americans, may be found either in old English authors, or are

known to have been used in one or other of the provincial brogues of

England. Captain Basil Hall notices the substitution of _fall_ for

Autumn; but he might have known, that though nearly obsolete in England,

it is still current in the west of England amongst the vulgar.[15] Even

the much laughed at _I guess_, is in vogue in Lancashire; so that with

the exception of _to tote_ for to carry, which, as Dr. Webster remarks,

was introduced by the negroes into the southern states, we do not know

whether a single word or expression supposed to be peculiar to the

United States, may be found, which cannot be traced to Great Britain or

Ireland. In the volume on Insect Architecture, issued by the Society for

the Diffusion of Useful Knowledge, we notice the word _sparse,_ which,

till then, we had supposed to be of American formation; and a late

writer in Blackwood's Magazine says, that the New-England word

_tarnation_, is current in the county of Suffolk in old England. The

probability of its being introduced into Massachusetts from that part of

England, is confirmed by the great number of towns in Massachusetts

bearing the same names as towns in the counties of Suffolk and Essex,

and by the correspondence remarked by travellers between the dialects of

the two districts. Every one may have observed, that the

New-Englanders,--many even of the educated amongst them,--pronounce the

participle _been_, as if written _ben_; and this peculiarity, we are

assured, is prevalent in the part of England just mentioned.

The American Quarterly Review, No. 17, March 1831 · 第 9 / 18 题