XV. The same fortune seems to have attended the second temple also. The

first, as we have related, was built by Tarquin, and dedicated by

Horatius. This was destroyed by fire in the civil wars. The second was

built by Sulla, but the name of Catulus appears as its dedicator, for

Sulla died before it was completed. This again was burned during the

civil tumults in the time of Vitellius, and Vespasian built a third,

which had nearly the same fortune as the others, except that he saw it

completed, and did not see it shortly afterwards destroyed, being thus

more fortunate than Tarquin in seeing the completion, and than Sulla in

seeing the dedication of his work. When Vespasian died the Capitol was

burned. The fourth and present temple was built and dedicated by

Domitian. It is said that Tarquin spent forty thousand pounds of silver

in building the foundations; but there is no private citizen in Rome at

the present day who could bear the expense of gilding the existing

temple, which cost more than twelve thousand talents. Its columns are of

Pentelic marble, exquisitely proportioned, which I myself saw at Athens;

but at Rome they were again cut and polished, by which process they did

not gain so much in gloss as they lost in symmetry, for they now appear

too slender. However, if any one who wonders at the expense of the

temple in the Capitol were to see the splendour of any one portico,

hall, or chamber in the house of Domitian, he would certainly be led to

parody that line of Epicharmus upon an extravagant fellow,

"Not good-natured, but possessed with the disease of giving,"

and would say that Domitian was not pious or admirable, but possessed

with the disease of building, and turned everything into bricks and

mortar, just as it is said Midas turned things into gold. So much for

this.

XVI. Tarquin, after the great battle in which his son was slain by

Brutus, took refuge at Clusium and begged Lars Porsena, the most

powerful king in Italy, to assist him. He was thought to be an

honourable and ambitious man, and promised his aid. First he sent an

embassy to Rome, ordering them to receive Tarquin; and when the Romans

refused to obey, he declared war against them, and telling them at what

place and time he would attack them, marched against them with a great

army. At Rome, Poplicola, though absent, was chosen consul for the

second time, and with him, Titus Lucretius. He returned to Rome, and by

way of putting a slight upon Porsena, went and founded the city of

Sigliuria, while his army was close at hand. He built the walls of this

place at a vast expense, and sent away seven hundred colonists to it, as

if the war with which he was menaced was a very unimportant matter. But,

nevertheless, Porsena made a sharp assault upon the walls of Rome, drove

away the garrison, and very nearly entered the town. Poplicola

forestalled him by sallying from one of the gates, and fought by the

banks of the Tiber against overwhelming numbers until he was severely

wounded and had to be carried out of the battle. As the same fate befell

his colleague Lucretius, the Romans lost heart and endeavoured to save

themselves by flight into the town. As the enemy also began to push

across the wooden bridge, Rome was in danger of being taken. But

Horatius, surnamed Cocles, and with him two of the noblest citizens,

named Herminius and Lartius, held the wooden bridge against them. This

Horatius was surnamed Cocles because he had lost an eye in the wars, or

as some say because of the flatness of his nose, which made his eyes and

eyebrows seem to meet, having nothing to separate them, and therefore

the people meaning to call him Cyclops, by a mistake of pronunciation,

named him Cocles. This man stood at the end of the bridge and kept off

the enemy until his friends behind had cut down the bridge. Then he

plunged into the river in his armour and swam to the other bank, though

wounded by an Etruscan spear in the thigh. Poplicola, in admiration of

his valour, at once proposed and passed a decree that every Roman should

give him the price of one day's provisions. Moreover, he gave him as

much land as he could plough in one day. And a brazen statue of him was

placed in the temple of Vulcan, by which honourable allusion was made to

the lameness caused by his wound.

XVII. As Porsena pressed the siege, the Romans suffered from famine, and

another separate army of Etruscans invaded their territory. But

Poplicola, who was now consul for the third time, though he thought it

his chief duty to remain stedfast and hold out the city against Porsena,

did nevertheless sally out and attack these men, routing them with a

loss of five thousand. Now as to the legend of Mucius, it is told in

many different ways, but I will relate it as it seems most probable that

it happened. He was a man of great courage, and very daring in war, who,

meaning to assassinate Porsena, stole into the camp in an Etruscan dress

and speaking the Etruscan language. When he arrived at the raised

platform on which the king was sitting, he did not exactly know which

was he, and being afraid to ask, he drew his sword and killed the man

who of all the party looked most as if he were the king. Hereupon, he

was seized and questioned. A fire was burning close by in a brazier

which had been brought for Porsena to offer sacrifice. Mucius held his

right hand over this, and while the flesh was being consumed looked at

Porsena cheerfully and calmly, until he in astonishment acquitted him

and restored him his sword, which Mucius took with his left hand. On

account of this he is said to have been named _Scaevola_, which means

left-handed. He then said that though he did not fear Porsena, he was

conquered by his generosity, and out of kindness would tell him what

torture would have failed to extort: "Three hundred young Romans

like-minded with myself are at present concealed in your camp. I was

chosen by lot to make the first attempt, and am not grieved that I

failed to kill a man of honour, who ought to be a friend rather than an

enemy to the Romans." Porsena, hearing this, believed it to be true, and

became much more inclined to make peace, not, I imagine, so much for

fear of the three hundred, as out of admiration for the spirit and

valour of the Romans. This Mucius is called Scaevola by all writers, but

Athenodorus, the son of Sandon, in his book which is dedicated to

Octavia, the sister of Caesar Augustus, says that he was also named

Posthumus.

XVIII. Poplicola, who did not think Porsena so terrible as an enemy as

he would be valuable as a friend and ally, was willing that he should

decide the quarrel between the Romans and Tarquin, and often proposed

that he should do so, feeling sure that he would discover him to be a

wretch who had been most deservedly dethroned. But Tarquin roughly

answered that he would submit his claims to no judge, and least of all

to Porsena, who had been his ally and now seemed inclined to desert him.

Porsena was angered at this, and, as his son Aruns also pleaded hard for

the Romans, put an end to the war upon condition that they should give

up the portion of Etruscan territory which they had seized, restore

their prisoners, and receive back their deserters. Upon this, ten youths

of the noblest families were given as hostages, and as many maidens,

among whom was Valeria, the daughter of Poplicola.

XIX. While these negotiations were going on, and Porsena, through his

confidence in the good faith of the Romans, had relaxed the discipline

of his camp, these Roman maidens came down to bathe in the river at a

place where a bank, in the form of a crescent, makes the water smooth

and undisturbed. As they saw no guards, nor any one passing except in

boats, they determined to swim across, although the stream was strong

and deep. Some say that one of them, by name Cloelia, rode on a horse

across the river, encouraging the others as they swam. When they had got

safe across they went to Poplicola, but he was displeased with them

because it made him seem more faithless than Porsena, and he feared lest

this daring feat of the maidens might be suspected of being a

preconcerted plot of the Romans. For these reasons he sent them back to

Porsena. Now Tarquin and his party, foreseeing that this would be done,

laid an ambush on the further bank and attacked those who were

escorting the girls with superior numbers. Still they made a stout

defence, and meanwhile Valeria, the daughter of Poplicola, made her way

through the combatants and escaped, and three slaves who also got away

took care of her. The others were mixed up with the fight, and were in

considerable danger, when Aruns, Porsena's son, came to the rescue, put

the enemy to the rout, and saved the Romans. When the girls were brought

before Porsena, he asked which it was that had conceived the attempt to

escape and encouraged the others. Being told that it was Cloelia, he

smiled kindly upon her, and presented her with one of his own horses,

splendidly caparisoned. This is relied upon by those who say that it was

Cloelia alone who rode on horseback over the river, as proving their

case. Others say that it was not because she used a horse, but to honour

her manly spirit that the Etruscan king made her this present. A statue

of her, on horseback, stands in the Sacred Way as you go up to the

Palatine Hill, which by some is said not to be a statue of Cloelia, but

of Valeria.

Porsena, after making peace with the Romans, among many other instances

of generosity, ordered his army to carry back nothing but their arms

when they retired, leaving the entrenched camp full of food and property

of every kind for the Romans. For this reason, at the present day,

whenever there is a sale of any public property, especially that which

is taken in war, proclamation is always made, "Porsena's goods for

sale," so that the Romans have never forgotten the kindness which they

received from him. A brazen statue of him used to stand near the senate

house, of plain and oldfashioned workmanship.

XX. After this the Sabines invaded the country. Marcus Valerius,

Poplicola's brother, and Posthumius Tubertus were then consuls, and

Marcus, acting by the advice of Poplicola, who was present, won two

great battles, in the second of which he slew thirteen thousand of the

enemy without the Romans losing a man. He was rewarded for this, in

addition to his triumph, by having a house built for him upon the

Palatine Hill at the public expense. And whereas all other street doors

open inwards, the doors of that house were made to open outwards, as a

perpetual memorial of the honour paid him by the people, who thus made

way for him. It is said that all the doors in Greece used once to open

this way, arguing from the comedies, in which those who are coming out

of a house always knock at the door, to warn those who are passing or

standing near not to be struck by the leaves of the door, as they open.

XXI. Next year Poplicola was consul for the fourth time. There was an

expectation of a war against the Latins and Sabines combined.

Moreover the city seemed to have displeased the gods; for all the

pregnant women were delivered prematurely, and of imperfectly formed

children. Poplicola, after appeasing the gods below according to the

injunctions of the Sibylline books, re-established certain games in

accordance with an oracle, brought the city into a more hopeful state of

mind, and began to consider what he had to fear from earthly foes, for

the enemy's army was large and formidable. There was one Appius Clausus,

a Sabine, of great wealth and remarkable personal strength, and a

virtuous and eloquent man, who, like all great men, was the object of

envy and ill-will to many. He was accused by his enemies of having put

an end to the war, because he wished to increase the power of Rome, in

order to enable him the more easily to triumph over the liberties of his

own country, and make himself king of it. Perceiving that the populace

eagerly listened to these tales, and that he was an object of dislike to

the war party and the army, he began to fear impeachment: so, having

numerous followers, besides his personal friends and relatives, he was

able to divide the state into two parties. This caused great delay in

the Sabines' preparations for attacking the Romans, and Poplicola,

feeling it to be his duty not merely to watch but to assist Clausus,

sent envoys, who spoke to him as follows: "Poplicola feels that you are

a man of honour, who would be unwilling to take vengeance upon your

countrymen, although you have been shamefully treated by them. But if

you choose to put yourself in safety by leaving your country and a

people that hates you, he will receive you, both in his public and his

private capacity, in a manner worthy of your own high character and of

the dignity of Rome." After much deliberation, Clausus decided that he

could not do better than accept this offer, and assembled all his

friends. They in their turn influenced many others, so that he was able

to transplant to Rome five thousand of the most peaceful and respectable

families of the Sabine nation. Poplicola, who had notice of their

arrival, welcomed them kindly and graciously. He made them all citizens

of Rome, and gave each of them two acres of land along the river Anio.

He gave Clausus twenty-five acres, and enrolled him among the Senators.

Clausus afterwards became one of the first men in Rome for wisdom and

power, and his descendants, the Claudian family, was one of the most

illustrious in history.

XXII. Though the disputes of the Sabines were settled by this migration,

yet their popular orators would not let them rest, but vehemently urged

that they ought not to let Appius, a deserter and an enemy, prevail upon

them to let the Romans go unpunished--a thing which he could not

persuade them to do when he was present among them. They proceeded to

Fidenae with a great army and encamped there, and laid two thousand men

in ambush before Rome, in wooded and broken ground, meaning in the

morning to send out a few horsemen to plunder ostentatiously. These men

were ordered to ride up close to Rome, and then to retire till their

pursuers were drawn into the snare. Poplicola heard of this plan the

same day from deserters, and quickly made all necessary arrangements. At

evening he sent Postumius Balbus, his son-in-law, with three thousand

men to occupy the tops of the hills under which the Sabine ambush was

placed. His colleague, Lucretius, was ordered to take the

swiftest-footed and noblest youth of the city, and pursue the plundering

horsemen, while he himself with the rest of the forces made a circuitous

march and outflanked the enemy. It chanced that a thick mist came on

about dawn, in the midst of which Postumius charged down from the hills

upon the men in ambush with a loud shout, while Lucretius sent his men

to attack the cavalry, and Poplicola fell upon the enemy's camp. The

Sabines were routed in every quarter, and even when fighting no longer

were cut down by the Romans, their rash confidence proving ruinous to

them. Each party thought that the others must be safe, and did not care

to stay and fight where they were, but those who were in the camp ran to

those in the ambush, and those in the ambush towards the camp, each of

them meeting those with whom they hoped to take refuge, and finding that

those who they had hoped would help them needed help themselves. The

Sabines would have been all put to the sword, had not the neighbouring

city of Fidenae afforded them a refuge, especially for the men from the

camp. Such as could not reach Fidenae were either put to death or taken

prisoners.

XXIII. The Romans, accustomed as they are to refer all great success to

the intervention of Heaven, thought that the whole glory of this

achievement was due to the general. The first thing heard was the

victorious soldiers declaring that Poplicola had delivered up the enemy

to them blind and lame, and all but in chains, for them to slaughter at

their ease. The people were enriched by the plunder and the sale of the

prisoners for slaves. Poplicola enjoyed a triumph, and previously

delivering over the administration of the city to the two succeeding

consuls, died shortly afterwards, having attained to the highest pitch

of glory that man can reach. The people, as if they had done nothing

during his life to honour him as he deserved, and were now for the first

time to show their gratitude, decreed him a public funeral, and moreover

that every person should contribute the coin called _quadrans_, to show

him respect. The women also made a common agreement to wear mourning for

him for a whole year. He was buried by a decree of the people within the

city near the place called Velia, and all his family were given the

privilege of burial there. At the present day not one of the family is

actually buried there, but the corpse is carried thither, and laid down,

while some one places a lighted torch under it for a moment, after which

it is carried away. By this ceremony they claim the right, although they

forego it, and bury the corpse outside the city.

COMPARISON OF SOLON AND POPLICOLA.

I. It is a point peculiar to this comparison, and which does not occur

in any of the other Lives which I have written, that in turn one

imitates and the other bears witness to his fellow's deeds. Observe, for

instance, Solon's definition of happiness before Croesus, how much

better it suits Poplicola than Tellus. He says that Tellus was fortunate

because of his good luck, his virtue, and his noble children; but yet he

makes no mention of him or of his children in his poetry, and he never

was a man of any renown, or held any high office.

Now Poplicola's virtues made him the most powerful and glorious of the

Romans during his life, and six hundred years after his death the very

noblest families of Rome, those named Publicola and Messala and

Valerius, are proud to trace their descent from him, even at the present

day. Tellus, it is true, died like a brave man fighting in the ranks,

but Poplicola slew his enemies, which is much better than being killed

oneself, and made his country victorious by skill as a general and a

statesman, and, after triumphing and enjoying honours of every kind,

died the death which Solon thought so enviable. Besides, Solon, in his

answer to Mimnermus about the time of life, has written the verses:

"To me may favouring Heaven send,

That all my friends may mourn my end,"

in which he bears witness to the good fortune of Poplicola; for he, when

he died, was mourned not only by all his friends and relations but by

the whole city, in which thousands wept for him, while all the women

wore mourning for him as if he were a son or father of them all that

they had lost.

Solon says in his poems,

"I long for wealth, but not procured

By means unholy."

Now Poplicola not only possessed wealth honourably acquired, but also

was able to spend it, much to his credit, in relieving the needy. Thus

if Solon was the wisest, Poplicola was certainly the most fortunate of

men; for what Solon prayed for as the greatest blessing, Poplicola

possessed and enjoyed to the end of his days.

II. Thus has Solon done honour to Poplicola; and he again honoured Solon

by regarding him as the best model a man could follow in establishing a

free constitution: for he took away the excessive power and dignity of

the consuls and made them inoffensive to the people, and indeed made use

of many of Solon's own laws; as he empowered the people to elect their

own consuls, and gave defendants a right of appeal to the people from

other courts, just as Solon had done. He did not, like Solon, make two

senates, but he increased the existing one to nearly double its number.

His grounds for the appointment of quaestors was to give the consul

leisure for more important matters, if he was an honest man; and if he

was a bad man, to remove the opportunity of fraud which he would have

had if he were supreme over the state and the treasury at once. In

hatred of tyrants Poplicola exceeded Solon, for he fixed the penalty for

a man who might be proved to be attempting to make himself king, whereas

the Roman allowed any one to kill him without trial. And while Solon

justly prided himself upon his having been offered the opportunity to

make himself despot, with the full consent of his fellow-countrymen, and

yet having refused it, Poplicola deserves even greater credit for having

been placed in an office of almost despotic power, and having made it

more popular, not using the privileges with which he was entrusted.

Indeed Solon seems to have been the first to perceive that a people

"Obeys its rulers best,

When not too free, yet not too much opprest."

III. The relief of debtors was a device peculiar to Solon, which, more

than anything else confirmed the liberty of the citizens. For laws to

establish equality are of no use if poor men are prevented from enjoying

it because of their debts; and in the states which appear to be the most

free, men become mere slaves to the rich, and conduct the whole business

of the state at their dictation. It should be especially noted that

although an abolition of debt would naturally produce a civil war, yet

this measure of Solon's, like an unusual but powerful dose of medicine,

actually put an end to the existing condition of internal strife; for

the well-known probity of Solon's character outweighed the discredit of

the means to which he resorted. In fact Solon began his public life with

greater glory than Poplicola, for he was the leading spirit, and

followed no man, but entirely single handed effected the most important

reforms; while Poplicola was more enviable and fortunate at the close of

his career.

Solon himself saw his own constitution overthrown, while that of

Poplicola preserved order in the city down to the time of the civil

wars; and the reason was that Solon, as soon as he had enacted his laws,

went on his travels, leaving them written on wooden tablets, defenceless

against all assailants; whereas Poplicola remained at home, acted as

consul, and by his statesmanship ensured the success and permanence of

the new constitution. Moreover, Solon could not stop Peisistratus,

although he perceived his designs, but was forced to see a despotism

established; while Poplicola destroyed a monarchy which had existed for

many years, showing equal virtue with Solon, but greater good fortune

and power to enable him to carry out his intentions.

IV. With regard to warlike achievements, Daimachus of Plataea will not

even admit that Solon made the campaign against the Megarians, which we

have related; but Poplicola both by strategy and personal valour won

many great battles. As a statesman, Solon seems to have acted somewhat

childishly in pretending that he was mad, in order to make his speech

about Salamis, while Poplicola ran the very greatest risks in driving

out the tyrant and crushing the conspiracy. He was especially

responsible for the chief criminals being put to death, and thus not

only drove the Tarquins out of the city, but cut off and destroyed

their hopes of return. And while he showed such vigour in enterprises

that required spirit and courage, he was equally admirable in peaceful

negotiations and the arts of persuasion; for he skilfully won over the

formidable Porsena to be the friend instead of the enemy of Rome.

Still we may be reminded that Solon stirred up the Athenians to capture

Salamis, which they had given up to the Megarians, while Poplicola

withdrew the Romans from a country which they had conquered. We must,

however, consider the circumstances under which these events took place.

A subtle politician deals with every thing so as to turn it to the

greatest advantage, and will often lose a part in order to save the

whole, and by sacrificing some small advantage gain another more

important one, as did Poplicola on that occasion; for he, by withdrawing

from a foreign country, preserved his own, gained the enemy's camp for

the Romans, who before were only too glad to save their city from ruin,

and at last, by converting his enemy into an arbitrator and winning his

cause, obtained all the fruits of victory: for Porsena put an end to the

war, and left behind him all his war material to show his respect for

the noble character of the consul.

LIFE OF THEMISTOKLES.

I. Themistokles came of a family too obscure to entitle him to

distinction. His father, Neokles, was a middle-class Athenian citizen,

of the township of Phrearri and the tribe Leontis. He was base born on

his mother's side, as the epigram tells us:

"My name's Abrotonon from Thrace,

I boast not old Athenian race;

Yet, humble though my lineage be,

Themistokles was born of me."

Plutarch's Lives, Volume 1 (of 4) · 第 17 / 42 段